➡ GET MY CHESS COURSES HERE: www.kaspachess.com/ ➡JOIN MEMEBERSHIP HERE: www.patreon.com/kaspachess/ ➡ Support This Channel via Donations: kaspachess.company.site/Channel-Support-p493714129
Hello chess lovers and friends, kindly take note that this is an entirely new and complete video on the Pirc. The last one was unjustified, short, and not particularly instructive. I tested the Pirc against actual players in the last video, but in this one, I've presented all the traps that my subscribers might find interesting. Next time, I might release another Pirc Defense video with a few minor modifications. Thank you 💟
Sir, I just destroyed an opponent in exactly the manner you recommended! The funny thing is, I have played the Pirc for years. I am always alert to not fall into this bad position in the Byrne variation. It had not occurred to me that my opponents might not be as careful. Immediately after watching this video, my opponent played the Pirc! 😀You have earned my subscription!
KaspaChess: After 1. E4 D6 2. D4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. Bg5 Bg7 5. E5 Nfd7 6. Nd5 Nc6 7 Exd6 cxd6 8. Nf4 is refuted, because of ..8 Ndxe5!! For example 9. Dxe5 leads to a loss, and 9. Bh4 leads to a worse position for White.
Thank you Kaspa for this tutorial. I played the Czech variation of the Pirc defence in the past with C6 followed by Qa5 with a pin on the Knight rather than G6. It would be interesting to see a refutation of the Czech Pirc , too.
Don't you think it would be a good idea to mention that at 2:29 Black should NOT play Qxd1, but play Ng4 and allow White to play Qxd8? The Black K needs to get to d8, to prevent all of White's nasty Nd5 / Nxc7 attacks! I know it's not at all obvious, and Black will frequently screw it up, but it's still a good idea to at least Mention your opponent's best moves...
Yes, you can simply subscribe to my channel here (th-cam.com/channels/MpKOskHES_XYapiA_LUUXA.html) and make sure to turn on the bell notification icon. That way, you will be able to watch all my new videos. Thank you for your support 💟
Idk if its me but it sounded like you said f--king instead of forking. Anyway I had a good chucklr at that Kaspa you don't have to say things like you are not making it up that's unnecessary i think its safe to sat we trust you. Besides the more better and knowledgeable players would be on to you right away if you tried being shifty
What I like to play after the immediate Nfd7 is f4, protecting the center. If black plays h6 or f6 it's a normal game where white is better. If black castles white can go h4, self-trapping the bishop, but going for an extremely dangerous attack. This line scores very well for white (on lichess) and unlike the one in the video it's not dubious at all.
Thanks for this, particularly the coverage of the rather rare variation after 6.Nd5. Dubious but dangerous. At 14:55 the right move is of course h6 after which Black is fine but it is easy to be trapped!
Yes, if black plays very accurately they can eventually reach a passive position where they have 2 pieces for a rook and 2 pawns, that's why the eval is only +1.5 for white. But in an actual game black will most likely make a mistake somewhere and white will get a winning position, which is why this line scores ~75% for white in the lichess database.
Hello, kindly take note that this is an entirely new and complete video on the Pirc. The last one was unjustified, short, and not particularly instructive. I tested the Pirc against actual players in the last video, but in this one, I've provided all the details that my subscribers might find interesting. Even the commentary are quite different, as you shall see. Last but not least, chess is a school unto itself, and improvement demands ongoing learning. Next time, I might release another Pirc Defense video with a few minor modifications. I appreciate your sincere concern.
➡ GET MY CHESS COURSES HERE: www.kaspachess.com/
➡JOIN MEMEBERSHIP HERE: www.patreon.com/kaspachess/
➡ Support This Channel via Donations: kaspachess.company.site/Channel-Support-p493714129
Hello chess lovers and friends, kindly take note that this is an entirely new and complete video on the Pirc. The last one was unjustified, short, and not particularly instructive. I tested the Pirc against actual players in the last video, but in this one, I've presented all the traps that my subscribers might find interesting. Next time, I might release another Pirc Defense video with a few minor modifications. Thank you 💟
Sir, I just destroyed an opponent in exactly the manner you recommended! The funny thing is, I have played the Pirc for years. I am always alert to not fall into this bad position in the Byrne variation. It had not occurred to me that my opponents might not be as careful. Immediately after watching this video, my opponent played the Pirc! 😀You have earned my subscription!
Thank you so much, and good to hear that. Keep it up and never stop 💟
COACH, CAN U SHOW ME HOW TO DEFEND E5 WHEN I PLAY BLACK THANK U VERY MUCH!!!!!..... APPRECIATE UR VIDEOS!!!!!
Plss share your memorable games coach 😊
Very informative. I hope to purchase soon
Yea this was fun, and helps me understand the strategies that my opponents are using against me. Good work showing us so many lines and variations.
Hi Boss...beautifully expressed your ideas 👍 thankyou 👍
KaspaChess: After 1. E4 D6 2. D4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. Bg5 Bg7 5. E5 Nfd7 6. Nd5 Nc6 7 Exd6 cxd6 8. Nf4 is refuted, because of ..8 Ndxe5!! For example 9. Dxe5 leads to a loss, and 9. Bh4 leads to a worse position for White.
Didn't he recommend 7. Bb5 not 7. exd6
Also why would white play 8. Nf4??
Offence is the best defence- they also say "YOU FUCK ME UP I FUCK YOU UP HA HA"
"THIS WORLD IS NIIIICE!!!"- KASPA CHESS
“FORKING” the King !!
Ahhhh - I had to listen to that a few times because I initially thought you said “f&cking” the King !!
.
🤔
Brilliant! The best treatment I have found! Thank you! :D
PS Your humour! DYING! XD
Thank you Kaspa for this tutorial. I played the Czech variation of the Pirc defence in the past with C6 followed by Qa5 with a pin on the Knight rather than G6. It would be interesting to see a refutation of the Czech Pirc , too.
Awesome. I will cover that in my next Pirc Defense video.
@@kaspachessofficial I used to play Czech Pirc too! :D
Don't you think it would be a good idea to mention that at 2:29 Black should NOT play Qxd1, but play Ng4 and allow White to play Qxd8? The Black K needs to get to d8, to prevent all of White's nasty Nd5 / Nxc7 attacks! I know it's not at all obvious, and Black will frequently screw it up, but it's still a good idea to at least Mention your opponent's best moves...
I like the way you teach,and can i follow you on your new vidoes.
Yes, you can simply subscribe to my channel here (th-cam.com/channels/MpKOskHES_XYapiA_LUUXA.html) and make sure to turn on the bell notification icon. That way, you will be able to watch all my new videos. Thank you for your support 💟
Hahaahhaha...Enjoyed the comment about loosing the queen to the knight..... funny men
As a "Pirc" player I choose to play 2 e5, the Maroczy Defense. Welcome the queen trade and hide the king on c7 or transpose into the Philidor.
I love the way he says "Forking " the rook and Queen. At least i think that's what he says.
Nxc2 is a check and fork, so won’t have the time to capture the e5 Knight. What should you do if they take?
Idk if its me but it sounded like you said f--king instead of forking. Anyway I had a good chucklr at that
Kaspa you don't have to say things like you are not making it up that's unnecessary i think its safe to sat we trust you. Besides the more better and knowledgeable players would be on to you right away if you tried being shifty
It's great so plenty of variation tricky moves advances positionings..how to gain materials exchange..!
Excellent
Very artistic play narration and analysis per se compatible with the quality of game of alekhine
Sir how to play against unknown, unnatural and not classic opening, how to crush this kind of players.
Great video, well explained. Im going to give this a try. :-)
I have played this twice in a tournament and league game recently, winning both games, thank you 🙏🏻
Wow 😳, very nice to hear, please keep on training and keep it up 👏👏👏
I liked you to elaborate details and every moves....i always shares your you tube.
You're the Man Kaspa, I'm a member of your club sir.
THANKS KASPA!!!!!..... CARRY ON!!!!!
When are we going to see you live Kaspa?
Wow! This is incredible! Thanks!!
I have subscribed long ago and I only wish I could subscribe more than once haha. Please don't stop making videos. You have helped me so much.
I can't thank you enough for showing such love. 🙏 Your support is what keeps me going. I really appreciate 🙏
You are great sir ,as a beginner ive learned a lot.
Very interesting material... Thank you
Hello ...... can you make also a trap moves on 150 attack or saemish variation...
Thanks in advance 😁
Sure I will, in the nearest future.
I think u have to play with me with this line
Very good techniques. Thanks.
Do you have a video on the Alekhine Defence four pawns attack black side?
Not yet, but since you have raised the need, I will consider making a video on that line. Thank you 🙏
What I like to play after the immediate Nfd7 is f4, protecting the center. If black plays h6 or f6 it's a normal game where white is better. If black castles white can go h4, self-trapping the bishop, but going for an extremely dangerous attack. This line scores very well for white (on lichess) and unlike the one in the video it's not dubious at all.
11:38 Instead of 1N-f3, 1N-d5 B×P, 2N-f3 P-f6, 3B×P P×B 4N×B P×N, 5N×cP× wins the rook.
2:27 This whole refutation depends on the black move Q×Q, which is unforced error. At 13:45 in the video Kaspa gets beyond that.
3:36 while what??? 😳😳😳
Appreciate it vid 😜
Very thrilling
Thanks for this, particularly the coverage of the rather rare variation after 6.Nd5. Dubious but dangerous. At 14:55 the right move is of course h6 after which Black is fine but it is easy to be trapped!
This is EXCELLENT
Good work
Very helpful
Nice, clear
Excellent
What about against the Black Lion Defense??
Wow!
@13:10 is White not going to eventually lose 2 pieces to a rook?
No, unless black wants to sacrifice two more pawns of his. Plug that into Stockfish, and it will still find a way of rescuing our a8-Knight.
Yes, if black plays very accurately they can eventually reach a passive position where they have 2 pieces for a rook and 2 pawns, that's why the eval is only +1.5 for white. But in an actual game black will most likely make a mistake somewhere and white will get a winning position, which is why this line scores ~75% for white in the lichess database.
This Pirc defence study you have posted earlier. Why posting again?
Hello, kindly take note that this is an entirely new and complete video on the Pirc. The last one was unjustified, short, and not particularly instructive. I tested the Pirc against actual players in the last video, but in this one, I've provided all the details that my subscribers might find interesting. Even the commentary are quite different, as you shall see. Last but not least, chess is a school unto itself, and improvement demands ongoing learning. Next time, I might release another Pirc Defense video with a few minor modifications. I appreciate your sincere concern.
4:07 i love the way he says "2400"
12:20 "...out of the equation..."
15:21 1.---N-f8, instead of 1.---P×B.