I think it would be great for scanning larger medium format film, like 6x7 as well as 4x5 and 8x10 large format film. I am currently using a 50mp canon 5dsr for scanning 6x7 medium format film.
Just a thought. As a Pro I bought the Nikon D1x in 2001 - it was our first digital camera and it was a revelation. The Fuji can actually to 407MP; you forgot the7, which is a whole 1 million pixels better than the Nikon could do in less than 20 years (the First Fuji GFX100 had this feature released in 2019).
Love the information and explanation of what pixelshift even is. 400mp is a lot more crisp but only a very specific type of shooting and type of camera user would need it. Imo not worth haha
Medium format is the future and the way to go! We just need a company to make a cheap medium format camera like that for the mainstream consumers! Also if that company made a new sensor more than double the medium format size, and that also had pixel shift and a ton of mpx that can make even better photos but priced it at 6 to 10k it would be a must have camera!!! I want to see Large Format! I want to see 3gb standard photos and 12 or 20gb pixel shift photos on that large sensor!!! I want to print super clear and detailed landscape and city photography where you can look at the photo like you are looking through your window!!!!!! I want panoramas cut from 9x6 of those photos that can cover a small wall but with details there so you need a magnifying glass to look at trees or little people inside buildings!!! Imagine that on a wall sized panorama! Large photo paper or printed on a large aluminum frame! I also want a UV printer that can print in even more details! A micro UV printer!!!
I think this feature is insane. I usually check the quality of the picture by over focusing it and check how pixelated in can get. I check my xt3 but I can’t find the feature. Will update the firmware and see if I ‘I’ll get it. Thanks for another expert video
I would really like to try my Rodenstock APO-Rodagon-D 2X 1:4.5 f=75mm (for 6X7cm, optimized for 1.2X-2.5X reproduction) lens with that camera. I use that lens with Nikon D610 to scan and archive old miniature photos and film. I believe that a larger sensor of Fuji would work better because the lens was made to work with a 6X7cm film format.
Can you suggest how big a 2x3inch impasto painting can be blown up to a giclee super quality print in inches? And is the GFX100 or 100S better for pixel shift or any other features? Many thanks for this review. x
Wow, 10k worth of camera + lens, 400MP for a photo of a battery. I always wanted to see the dust specs on my batteries larger than life. Thanks for that.
@@MarioSoMedia Oh - a Sony battery. That changes everything :-) Don't take this too personal, but in my experience technical specs are - in my opinion - just way better demonstrated with real world subjects of interest. In case of this camera - not sure when 100MP is not enough.
@@bernios3446 agreed! It was kinda the point I was trying to illustrate. Also with Pixel Shift I can't photograph people or scenery because you can't have any movement at all in camera or in frame. So quite limited with test subjects. And none taken! 😀
I do scanning and archiving of old and small photographs and old film. This camera and quality macro lens (at 1:1) or even micro lens would be perfect for that kind of work.
So is 400MP overkill? 😅
just a tad
No just right 😊
@@EoghanBell Yeah just a tiny bit 😅
@@StephEatsnTravels haha 😀😬
A little haha
I think it would be great for scanning larger medium format film, like 6x7 as well as 4x5 and 8x10 large format film. I am currently using a 50mp canon 5dsr for scanning 6x7 medium format film.
Watching the ads to support you! Thanks for this detailed information!
Thanks! I appreciate that!
Just a thought. As a Pro I bought the Nikon D1x in 2001 - it was our first digital camera and it was a revelation. The Fuji can actually to 407MP; you forgot the7, which is a whole 1 million pixels better than the Nikon could do in less than 20 years (the First Fuji GFX100 had this feature released in 2019).
Nice! That was a great camera. Never used it but heard great things. I actually used a Nikon D800 for a few years
Nice vid, helpful thank you.
Glad it helped!
Thanks for the info!
Thanks for watching
Love the information and explanation of what pixelshift even is. 400mp is a lot more crisp but only a very specific type of shooting and type of camera user would need it. Imo not worth haha
Haha yup! Very niche use.
Medium format is the future and the way to go!
We just need a company to make a cheap medium format camera like that for the mainstream consumers!
Also if that company made a new sensor more than double the medium format size, and that also had pixel shift and a ton of mpx that can make even better photos but priced it at 6 to 10k it would be a must have camera!!!
I want to see Large Format! I want to see 3gb standard photos and 12 or 20gb pixel shift photos on that large sensor!!! I want to print super clear and detailed landscape and city photography where you can look at the photo like you are looking through your window!!!!!!
I want panoramas cut from 9x6 of those photos that can cover a small wall but with details there so you need a magnifying glass to look at trees or little people inside buildings!!! Imagine that on a wall sized panorama! Large photo paper or printed on a large aluminum frame!
I also want a UV printer that can print in even more details! A micro UV printer!!!
I think this feature is insane. I usually check the quality of the picture by over focusing it and check how pixelated in can get. I check my xt3 but I can’t find the feature. Will update the firmware and see if I ‘I’ll get it. Thanks for another expert video
Yeah it's pretty insane. I don't think Pixel Shift is available on the xt3 unfortunately.
NICE! Imagine if they have pixel shift on all the Fujifilm flagship cameras!
That would be very nice!
I would really like to try my Rodenstock APO-Rodagon-D 2X 1:4.5 f=75mm (for 6X7cm, optimized for 1.2X-2.5X reproduction) lens with that camera.
I use that lens with Nikon D610 to scan and archive old miniature photos and film.
I believe that a larger sensor of Fuji would work better because the lens was made to work with a 6X7cm film format.
That sounds amazing! Would love to try that lens!
How to adapt that lens (and enlargement lenses) to GFX?
@@tiziocaio8657 I'm very busy right now. I will describe how I adapted my lens to my Nikon camera as soon as I get some time.
@@MrCROBosanceros thanks
@@MrCROBosanceros thanks, since I have an adapter Nikon F to gfx it would be ease for me to do the same as you
Can you suggest how big a 2x3inch impasto painting can be blown up to a giclee super quality print in inches? And is the GFX100 or 100S better for pixel shift or any other features? Many thanks for this review. x
Looks great for macro.
For sure!
Wow, 10k worth of camera + lens, 400MP for a photo of a battery. I always wanted to see the dust specs on my batteries larger than life. Thanks for that.
Thanks for commenting. Illustrating how Pixel Shift works. And not just any battery, a Sony battery, we'll and a camera and a lens.
@@MarioSoMedia Oh - a Sony battery. That changes everything :-)
Don't take this too personal, but in my experience technical specs are - in my opinion - just way better demonstrated with real world subjects of interest. In case of this camera - not sure when 100MP is not enough.
@@bernios3446 agreed! It was kinda the point I was trying to illustrate. Also with Pixel Shift I can't photograph people or scenery because you can't have any movement at all in camera or in frame. So quite limited with test subjects.
And none taken! 😀
I do scanning and archiving of old and small photographs and old film.
This camera and quality macro lens (at 1:1) or even micro lens would be perfect for that kind of work.
@@MrCROBosanceros what % do you think an image can be enlarged and printed at after using pixel shift?