Ablakwa rejects “bizarre” CHRAJ ruling on Rev. Kusi Boateng case. All you need to Know! | EWN

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 5

  • @emikinc
    @emikinc 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The fact that some of these media houses still trust Ablakwa even shows that most of our journalists are not serious.
    You choose to trust the word of an MP who up till now cannot produce the other passport of Rev Kusi Boateng which he claims he has as evidence. When asked by CHRAJ to produce it he says he is still searching for it. Meanwhile you told the whole Ghana that you have copies of the two passports that proves that Rev Kusi has double identity.
    And people are still praising him and believing him.
    Lord have mercy on this nation.

  • @andyzutah5684
    @andyzutah5684 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So why did CHRAJ talk about only Passport?
    Are we being Serious as a country

    • @ObengDacosta
      @ObengDacosta 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Listening to only one side.go read the report urself bro.

  • @nicesongbothcway1913
    @nicesongbothcway1913 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Please Umara, chraj did not recommend the prosecution of the board. The conclusion of chraj was that it does not find any corruption but is apprehensive that same was done. Chraj therefore recommended that there should be further investigations and possible prosecution if found culpable. That is all. Chraj never said they are guilty of anything

  • @derickjd5274
    @derickjd5274 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The name he's using on the board of the national cathedral is Victor Kusi Boateng. This even more proves his double identity.