Sir, in case in which with the leave of the court can we cross the witness of prosecution ...for further time...like after entering into the defence witnesses..or after closing of defense witnesses
sir please guide in IPC section 498a , can a complainant can step back or withdraw her complaint in trial court as depostion chief, cross examination is completed of complainant . any provision or procedure ,please guide. ( in summan case we have 203 crpc and 257 CRPC)
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 only in trial court, please guide whether the Trial Court have power, if Complainant (wife) agree in court for compromise of matter, hence Trial court can use its discretion power OR crpc 320 to compound the 498A case dismissed or dispose or acquit the accused as wife has stepped back of Complaint
Sir , under trial before a court of session, the section 232 is acquittal - (hearing prosecution nd defence ), before entering upon defence and arguments .So only court of session have power to hear prosecution nd defence before entering upon defence and argument and not to magistrates
Thank you sir..pls do share cases of dis section specifically u/s 406 and 420 of ipc triable by magistrate..and how one can file discharge application as the case is not committed yet..as the accused is on anticipatory bail only charge sheet has been filed till now.
Sir in mains if question is asked to discuss sessions or warrant trial, then do we require to write each section from 225-237 or 238-250? What if we forget the content of section? I mean how to write such answer.
sir you said that defense council can request the court to cross examine pp witness at one go i.e. after chief of witnesses is over, but if a proceeding comes to close after chief of pp witnesses, how can we cross examine pp witnesses, because proviso puts a bar, do we have seek permission of court for this that let the chief be conducted first & after that we will cross examine? if yes, under which provision ? please explain
Proceedings can't be closed like u said, if suppose wittneses don't come for cross examination then his chief examination can't be read in evidence as its incomplete evidence
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 but sir then why proviso to sec. 243(2)was added? because suppose defense submits list of witnesses before trial, but learns that during trial, material witness is omitted out, then accused can't apply for summoning witness, because sec.243(2) bars it. Is it not violative of fair trial, in consonance with art.14 & 21 of constitution? please answer
once 239 crpc gets dismissed in lower court, hence instead of filling 397 CRPC , accused can also file quashing in high court U/s 482 Crpc if he have strong grounds by taking the advantage of dismissal order of 239 crpc. please guide am I correct..
was that a meaning of proviso, please tell because, it is written' when accused has cross examined or has the opportunity of cross examine, any witness, before entering his defense, does it imply any party or it is general practice? please answer
Sir, your lecture are too much helpful but you voice is too fast so please speak slow motion, because due to fast speaking we couldn't understand clearly.
Hello sir... you are great .. sir.. I have a problem that .. how to learn crpc section . Bcoz they are hard to learn as it is . Is there any trick to remeber or any mnemonic.. plz.. help me..
U re making a huge impact sir g! Lots of love and respect!
धन्यवाद, महोदय
Nice lecture sir, thanku so much aapne bahut hi accha samjhaya
My favorite teacher
Mind blowing sir
Love you sir ji don't take me wrong but i love the way you teach and that love you is like a student say to his teacher
Welcome g
Thank you sir and please keep making more videos like that on different topics of diffrent syllabus
Amazing sir 😍
i m waiting for this lecture,sir
super sirji.........
Great explanation sir🙏🙏
Thank you sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Guruuuuu ji awesome
Thanks Sir ji
sir, under trial of case other than on police report @3:45
Isn't the first step before framing charge is Preliminary inquiry u/s. 202 of Crpc?
thanks.
Thanks so so so much 🙏🏼🙏
All good
Thank you sir 🙏🏻
thnx alot sir 🙏🙏🙏
Thnx sir❤❤
Thank u 🙏
Grdaaaa sir(bihari)
THank u sir🙏
Thank you so much sir
Thank you sir
Thank you so much sir 🙏
Very good evening sir ji
Pa g....aik request Hy crpc me last p bond sy related chapter Hy unko achy sy explain kar Dy plz
G sure
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 how can I get ur notes or any further guidance
WhatsApp on 9478294750
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 okay
Thku so much sir 😊🙏🏻
Sir your lectures are amazing..I also bought notes that is also good.sir when will you provide the notes of other subjects?
It will take some time
Sir ji namaskar please request tell me best book for practice book for mcq
Sir, in case in which with the leave of the court can we cross the witness of prosecution ...for further time...like after entering into the defence witnesses..or after closing of defense witnesses
sir please guide in IPC section 498a , can a complainant can step back or withdraw her complaint in trial court as depostion chief, cross examination is completed of complainant
. any provision or procedure ,please guide. ( in summan case we have 203 crpc and 257 CRPC)
U can't withdraw but u can take the help of section 482 of crpc for quashing FIR, or complainant can resile from her statement in examination in chief
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 only in trial court, please guide whether the Trial Court have power, if Complainant (wife) agree in court for compromise of matter, hence Trial court can use its discretion power OR crpc 320 to compound the 498A case dismissed or dispose or acquit the accused as wife has stepped back of Complaint
Sir , under trial before a court of session, the section 232 is acquittal - (hearing prosecution nd defence ), before entering upon defence and arguments .So only court of session have power to hear prosecution nd defence before entering upon defence and argument and not to magistrates
Thank you sir..pls do share cases of dis section specifically u/s 406 and 420 of ipc triable by magistrate..and how one can file discharge application as the case is not committed yet..as the accused is on anticipatory bail only charge sheet has been filed till now.
Will do everything
Sir in mains if question is asked to discuss sessions or warrant trial, then do we require to write each section from 225-237 or 238-250? What if we forget the content of section? I mean how to write such answer.
sir you said that defense council can request the court to cross examine pp witness at one go i.e. after chief of witnesses is over, but if a proceeding comes to close after chief of pp witnesses, how can we cross examine pp witnesses, because proviso puts a bar, do we have seek permission of court for this that let the chief be conducted first & after that we will cross examine? if yes, under which provision ? please explain
Proceedings can't be closed like u said, if suppose wittneses don't come for cross examination then his chief examination can't be read in evidence as its incomplete evidence
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 but sir then why proviso to sec. 243(2)was added? because suppose defense submits list of witnesses before trial, but learns that during trial, material witness is omitted out, then accused can't apply for summoning witness, because sec.243(2) bars it. Is it not violative of fair trial, in consonance with art.14 & 21 of constitution? please answer
Before the argument stage any party make the request to call any witness for examination as a chief or for cross, plz read proviso
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thank you
SIR YOU ARE NOT CLEAR HERE, THE SAME QUESTION IS MY ALSO, PLEASE CLEAR IT🙏@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827
once 239 crpc gets dismissed in lower court, hence instead of filling 397 CRPC , accused can also file quashing in high court U/s 482 Crpc if he have strong grounds by taking the advantage of dismissal order of 239 crpc. please guide am I correct..
sir, sec 91 crpc, sec 311 crpc & 313 crpc, 319 crpc when applicable during trial ? please answer
Thqqq sir
was that a meaning of proviso, please tell because, it is written' when accused has cross examined or has the opportunity of cross examine, any witness, before entering his defense, does it imply any party or it is general practice? please answer
It's Genral practice
Sir, your lecture are too much helpful but you voice is too fast so please speak slow motion, because due to fast speaking we couldn't understand clearly.
Hello sir... you are great .. sir.. I have a problem that .. how to learn crpc section . Bcoz they are hard to learn as it is . Is there any trick to remeber or any mnemonic.. plz.. help me..
Sir ji namaskar I humbly request Sir ji 2018 ADA exam ka paper 1&2 analysis kar do Sir
Will try
Sir ji test series start kardo sir ji
How are you sir 😊
Good Evening Sir ji . Sir ji what is the key difference between Mandatory, obligatory and discretionary ?
Thanks sir ji 🙂
Sir ji namaskar please request tell me best book for practice book for mcq
Universal, lexis Nexis or singhal
Thanks sir 🙏🙏🙏