Vos émotions vous jouent des tours? Emotions et prise de décisions surtout en temps de COVID.

Vous voulez participer à des groupes d'éducation thérapeutique ? Vous voulez en savoir plus sur le TDAH et/ou les Troubles Anxieux, contactez nous par mail à l'adresse suivante pour obtenir des infos sur nos services de psychoéducation :
[e-mail]
SOUTENEZ NOUS SUR TIPEEE ! et accéder a des contenus exclusifs dont des lives questions réponses. fr.tipeee.com/... Vous voulez participer à des groupes d'éducation thérapeutique ? Vous voulez en savoir plus sur le TDAH et/ou les Troubles Anxieux, contactez nous par mail à l'adresse suivante pour obtenir des infos sur nos services de psychoéducation :
[e-mail] Mon OnlyFans : Les articles en questions :
Family medicine practitioners’ stress during
the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional
survey
:
www.ncbi.nlm.n...
Emotion and Decision Making :
scholar.harvar...
The influence of fear on risk taking: a meta-analysis :
pubmed.ncbi.nl...
From today’s Telegraph newspaper (UK) (excerpts only - link below). This is equally applicable to many Western former liberal democracies. Shame on them all.
Members of Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour express regret about ‘unethical’ methods
ByGordon Rayner, ASSOCIATE EDITOR14 May 2021 • 9:00pm
Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people’s behaviour during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was “unethical” and “totalitarian”. Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B) expressed regret about the tactics in a new book about the role of psychology in the Government’s Covid-19 response.
SPI-B warned in March last year that ministers needed to increase “the perceived level of personal threat” from Covid-19 because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”.
Gavin Morgan, a psychologist on the team, said: “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government.”
Mr Morgan spoke to author Laura Dodsworth, who has spent a year investigating the Government’s tactics for her book A State of Fear, published on Monday.
SPI-B is one of the sub-committees that advises the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), led by Sir Patrick Vallance, the chief scientific adviser.
One SPI-B scientist told Ms Dodsworth: “In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we have used fear is dystopian. The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”
Another SPI-B member said: “You could call psychology ‘mind control’. That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past.”
One warned that “people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn’t happen otherwise… We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in”.
Another said: “Without a vaccine, psychology is your main weapon… Psychology has had a really good epidemic, actually.”
Another member of SPI-B said they were “stunned by the weaponisation of behavioural psychology” during the pandemic, and that “psychologists didn’t seem to notice when it stopped being altruistic and became manipulative. They have too much power and it intoxicates them”.
www.telegraph....
La page Facebook de l'association Fou de Normandie : / foudenormandie
Twitter : / jeanalexanian
La base transparence santé : www.transparen...
·
📷 Illustration réalisée par Arthur de L'éveil du TDAH :
eveildutdah.fr...