What Planets' Insides Look Like
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ต.ค. 2024
- How much do you know about the planets of our solar system? By combining information about a planet's seismic activity, density, magnetic field and so on, we can make assumptions about a planet's interior. Let's find out, what's inside them.
Animation is created by Bright Side.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music by Epidemic Sound www.epidemicso...
Check our Bright Side podcast on Spotify and leave a positive review! open.spotify.c...
Subscribe to Bright Side: goo.gl/rQTJZz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Social Media:
Facebook: / brightside
Instagram: / brightside.official
TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
Stock materials (photos, footages and other):
www.depositpho...
www.shuttersto...
www.eastnews.ru
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more videos and articles visit:
www.brightside.me
Scientists recently found out that Mars is a lot more seismically active than previously thought.
science scammers said
do you really believe this?
Indeed i would like too know if the notions behind the video are contemplating even the latest updates from inSight probe
Yes, there's a huge bulge/upwelling of magma, a chamber under the Tharsis region to this day.
Yet it doesn't have a molten core cause if it had it would have a magnetic field what it clearly doesn't have
@@melle1996meijer Again, you're wrong, the latest findings are that the core is indeed molten. Venus most definitely is volcanically active and has no magnetic field. This, should tell you how flawed your logic is.
I’m honestly confused about the non-inclusion / randomness of these celestial bodies:
1. Venus?
2. Uranus?
3. Ee-oh is pronounced “eye-oh” I think…
4. Titan? I mean, if you’re looking at Europa and Io…
5. Enceladus?
6. Pluto? Might as well. I meant as far as digging into the core…
The name Io comes from Latin and means "I".
It's actually pronounced like that in modern Italian so I think "eh-oh" is also correct.
Eye-oh is the american pronounciation. E-oh is the original form.
Exactly! I wondered if I had missed Venus, it makes no sense not to include it, we even have PICTURES of Venus' surface from landers! Also, Jupiter was revisited multiple times, which was weird and confusing.
Seriously the editing on this is spastic.
Fr like how did yall do two moons but no the other planets
Mars is not geologically inactive. InSight (Who recently shut down forever) has shown us a lot of Mars and how it's still very much active in some capacity. The largest marsquake recorded by InSight clocked in at a 4.2. It's also much more porous than previously assumed, which might mean there's more radioactive elements present there than here on earth.
Also the reason it doesn’t have a magnetic field is because there was as much liquid separation between denser and lighter materials. They sort of just mixed together without much difference in the mantle or so I read.
Also, there have been some VERY tantalizing discoveries made at Gale Crater in the recent years. We wont be absolutely sure until a sample return mission in 2030, but some of the photos being sent back from Gale go WAY beyond fossilized microbes on a rock. I urge anyone reading this to do some googling :)
@lotus *there are more radioactive elements there is? C'mon man!
This video is full of amateurish errors.
The asymmetry of the lunar crust may indicate that the crust formed, still molten, while already tidally-locked to the Earth. It would act as a sort of centerfuge, pushing more mass toward the outer edge of the orbit. REALLY cool.
Hmm. The centrifuge answer is one I hadn't considered. I assumed that as the bodies became tidally locked the center of mass of the system, would be near the systems gravitational center. Is the orbit of the moon sufficient to generate this centrifugal force?
@@equious8413 I would tend to think there's not enough centrifugal force but much earlier in the history of the earth-moon system the moon's orbit was much closer and therefore much faster so I suppose it's possible.
The thickness of Luna's crust does not depend on whether the Sun shines upon it. It depends on location.
Specifically, the crust on the side near Earth appears to be thinner than the crust far from Earth.
This is surprising to me. Any theories as to why? You'd think gravity on the side facing may cause some kind of.. bulge. You'd think the centers of mass would be nearest the systems gravitational center 🤔
@@equious8413 there is a theory that we had two moons, and when they collided the near side is what remains of it
I think you're a little confused. It's called the "dark side" not because the Sun never shines on it, but because it always faces away from us on Earth. Hence humans on Earth have never seen it, hence "dark side". Also when rockets or satellites orbit over that side, they can't communicate via radio with Earth, hence their radio "goes dark". Still, it _is_ rather confusingly labelled.
@@DavidStruveDesigns While calling the far side dark is still inaccurate, it is not what I am complaining about this time.
What I am complaining about is that he called the near side sunny.
@@frantisekvrana3902 Yeah I re-watched it cos I didn't quite catch it the first time, and you're correct - he did. And yeah, that's incorrect as you pointed out. So my bad, I misheard him not you. Apologies :)
The reason Mercury has such a large core might be because it once was a much larger planet according to some theories. Things were chaotic early on especially with Jupiter and with Mercurys funky orbit it seems likely something major happened to it after formation. Might have been a Earth like planet or even a super Earth at one point which we are finding to be pretty common out there. Maybe in the future we will have some super algorithm that can perfectly rewind the solar systems history and tell us what happened.
Isn't Sun burning Merkury's surface?
@@WikiNieWikiYes but if I remember correctly, while the sun liquidities some of the surface of Mercury, the side facing away is cold enough to consolidate the rock back on the surface, meaning no mass is ever loss.
@@Kidgermodsout Yeah I do remember hearing something to that effect. I don't think Mercury is being burned off into space if that's what Wiki is saying never heard anyone make that claim.
@@WikiNieWiki u spelled mercury incorrectly
So much for the "We're now going to drill Uranus" jokes.
🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Were going to drill through the toilet goofy ahh smell aka “ uranus “
This change subjects real quickly XD
First we're talking about insides of a planet, the next thing you know that he's explaining what would happen if earth is the same size a Jupiter XD
Cool vid tho! It's interesting :)
*PKXD
Skipped Uranus.
@@Aheumanitor bro what
Its all over the place😂😂😂
I'd be very interested to know how we learned all this.
Was about to comment the same
There’s plenty of scientific papers published on the topics out there to read.
A lot of it is still theoretical, we don’t actually know exactly what Jupiter’s core is made of. But there’s some theories that it is made of metallic hydrogen. I’m wondering how they’re so confident that half of these objects have iron cores. I would’ve liked for the people making this video to specify how we know these things and talk more about this topic generally before confidently describing the contents of each object
@@grimreefer213 ahaha all of it still theories, they havent even got to our own core yet
@@thearianmandalorian 💯
Why did you skip drilling into Uranus? 👀
I don’t think Uranus do not even have a Core!
@@learn4funnowgood buddy
Papg
Funny part is No one knows what they look like inside, people can't even agree what the moon looks like inside and it's the closest body we have to he earth
bruh
BrUh
bRuH
Can someone explain how people can know this.
these infographic channels tend to gloss over a lot of the details, I won't try to explain it myself coz I'm no scientist but channels like PBS Spacetime, Astrum, and Anton Petrov have a few videos that go into more detail about atomic emmission spectra and mathmatical simulations of these planets that predict what these planets are really like (along with data from probes that we've sent to these planets to study them).
they speculate
They pull it out of Uranus. This video is rediculous.
An actual scientists would give you all the real information there is but would you still agree to an information you have no grasp about?!
@@changsangma1915 if they are going there and measuring it with machines and stuff. Yeah very believable.
What happened to Venus & Uranus?
I know I was like…?
@@erikm8372 the video was long & fairly inaccurate. I never finished watching it.
How do they even know all these? It's not like they can see through planets all have drilled through any of them. That's what fascinates me.
I drilled them myself with my handy drill from the garage.
Just have a look at Juno probe's instruments (wikipedia).
Bright side: I think I forgot about something
person: If you forgot about it then it wasn't important.
Bright side: your right
Venus:
I learned what the inside of Jupiter looked like from the One Punch Man manga.
I love how he goes into the wall thingy on earth and he turns into a full spaceship
@@astonaston1270 ye ikr
badass
Fun fact: Mars is a lot more seismically active than previously thought
Venus and Uranus: 🧍🧍
Europa has an icy crust and likely a volcanic sea floor somewhat similar to the surface of Io. Europa and other moons of Jupiter that orbit close enough will likely never cool down. They are stirred by the gravity of Jupiter and that keeps their mantle molten.
Mars: Geologically active
Jupiter: liquid metallic hydrogen core
Io: eye oh
Uranus: yes?
I like learning about these types of stuff its kinda cool ngl.
Always interesting to see Jupiter's composition get discussed. I wonder when we'll advance beyond the notion that the planet is 90% hydrogen (the lightest element in the universe) and 10% helium (the next lightest) and yet it self accreted these elements into a planet that is 2.5 times the mass of all the other planets combined. It's a lazy answer.
In a gravity well, matter is stratified by its density which is why you have light atmospheric gasses on top (radially speaking) and dense metals at the bottom (core.)
On earth, hydrogen readily escapes off into outer space. In fact all the 4 inner 'terrestrial' planets have weak atmospheres, slow rotations and low mass compared to the outer 4 'gas giants'
They're gas giants because they have a very large core that is able to grab and hang onto and even compress gasses. Hydrogen does not escape from jupiter. Its well is very deep.
Lazy?
@@justynpryce Yes lazy
it's an antiquated thought being regurgitated without giving the information being swallowed any rigorous contemplation.
Alarms during the voice over, that's special.
Drilling video he says Jupiter’s core reaches 50,000c in temp but second video with the Great Red Spot says the core is upto 28,000c? I like these type of videos and the animations really make things look great but fact checking and consistency is very important.
Yes and also Europa in order for there to be life there the core should be hot from the gravitational effects of Jupiter
This is what confused me. Said 90,000 F, 4:41, then said 43,000 F, 9:28. How's there so much deviation in the same video?
And later on said we could fall from side to side due to how low dense it was.
Okay they did all the planets a couple moons of Jupiter but what happened to Venus why didn't they do this for Venus
Venus gets no love.
@@ki5aok Neither does mercury, It's the smallest planet and it has NO moons.
outer planets has a core called dense solid rock
Nobody:
The teacher: *Talks about stuff only some scientists know*
"Sunny side" and "dark side" of the moon? And that affects the thickness of the crust? You aren't aware that both the nearside and the farside get pretty much the same amount of sunlight over the course of an orbit? We're done here.
Wow, great intelligent 🧠🤓✊ cool vid
Loving the Rick portals and light saber reference. ..
There is no "dark side" of the moon. Every side of the moon gets sunlight. It's tidally locked to Earth, the same side always faces Earth, so there's a near side and a far side, but no dark side.
you dropped it PERFECTLY VERTICAL
You built this drill out of Delroy Lindo's unobtainium, huh?
I just want to know how do you know this stuff without ever being there to even sample the land or anything else on the planet
You dropped a lightsaber perfectly verticle on EVERY planet?
About mars they do think mars recently they think its still has a living core of molten metal like our own as mars has earth quakes or just quakes they think are lava plumes under the surface scishow did a episode on it.
Just because we never see the dark side of the Moon doesn't mean it's always dark. Why is the crust so much thicker? Edit: I think I get it now. It's the gravity of Earth pulling the dense center of the Moon with more force then the lighter outer crust. May have settled this way while the moon was still molten
There is no "dark side" of the Moon. The far side gets as much sunlight as the near side.
It's the dark side meaning dark to us since we can never see it from the Earth.
higher gravity won’t fundamentally impede flying, as athmosphere will indeed become denser, which in some sense will make it even easier to fly. we’ll just have to evolve not just physically, but also technologically and develop different sorts of planes that will rely on these changed conditions.
also, birds will much more rely on floating and will have to grow much bigger and stronger, with huge wide wings which will allow them to float on in the air, like huge living kites, using ascending and descending currents.
shouldnt Eroupa be a marine life then?
You know, I think Martian tunnels will be very deep... Like, deeper than anything we know or understand. We are talking ultra deep. Imagine 100 mile deep shafts with a hive of people. humans living literally like ants.
That won't happen till the 41st millenia
the drill looks like a lightsaber💀
Definitely glad I came to comments first🖐. Thanks.
Where do you get the information to give this type of data?
Wikipedia
Wiki, where anyone can edit the information.
Scientists theorize that the core of gas giants is made out of Metallic Hydrogen, aka. Hydrogen that is compressed so much that the space between atoms is nil and it starts having a pattern of a metallic substance in structure.
We still don't know if it would be liquid or solid, but most say it'll be solid metallic hydrogen.
This guy is the reason why people is living happily
"👏🏽 Fairly interesting!" (-James)
When u are in the middle of an object, mass is outside = No gravity only pressure.
Super Atom ?
Mars has confirmed seismic activity from data sent back from InSight.
Wow!
I feel like I need to clarify something. The moon does not have a "sunny side" and "dark side" but instead has a near and far side both of which are subject to lunar day and night.
If jupiters core is completely molten due to the intense gravimetric pressures then why would earths molten core solidify when it's the size of jupiter.... makes no sense to me.
sorry but your info about mars is incorrect it does in fact have a molten mantel and magma as well as quakes a magnitude 5 was recorded by one of the landers on its surface not that long ago
What happened to Venus, and the rest of the planets and large moons?
The Moon doesn't HAVE a dark side - it just a long day (28 Earth days). When we have no moonlight ("a new Moon") it's because the Sun is shining on its far side. If you got this basic fact wrong, what else did you get wrong? The Moon DOES have a "near side" and a "far side" - which is a totally different thing.
2:50 Skips from Mercury to Mars? Venus not in the way?
nasa doesn't even know what our coe looks lik what makes you think that they know what other planets
Waittt can we eat the dirt in other planet which has no life.means no bacteria?
How do they know what is like under 250 miles of the surface of Mercury?
YOUR THE BEST I LOVE SPACS
❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉😊😊
Actually Mars is currently being seismicly active
I didn't realise the moon had a molting core pretty cool
Towards the end speaking about if we were the size of Jupiter, you forgot to add how time would essentially be slower, based on Einsteins Theory of Relativity
Actually, the difference would be very very tiny. A few seconds at most.
there is not a dark and sunny side of the Moon. there is a side that faces the Earth and a side that faces away, but both sides get roughly 14 days of sun light and 14 days of darkness. the crust of the Moon is thinner on the Earth facing side
Amazing
5:35 “challenger deep”
The Mariana Trench: am I a JOKE to you?
i like how the video is replaced around 10 minutes in
Jupiter's slower orbital period is due to its distance from the sun, not its mass. An object's mass has no effect on its orbital period. Earth would only orbit the sun slower if you also moved it to the same distance from the sun as Jupiter.
Yes bright side is right if you drill the core of a planet then it would be unnecessary as a planet would pretty much explode.
The thickness of the moons crust is because of the way it formed, and there's no way of knowing how thick it is on either side, it's all just conjecture.
The moons molten core would be very small, if it exists at all.
A large meteor strike will cause the moon to ring like a bell, giving the impression that it is either a solid ball of iron ( actually an alloy), or that it is hollow (there's the belief by some that it's not even a natural object, but a very large ship...maybe like the Deathstar?).
I guess anything is possible, no matter how unlikely!
We need a Shuttle fleet like this one
There is no sunny or dark side of the moon...
There is
@@Gabriel_playsmm2officialas day and night go by evey 28 days, sure :)
There was two NASA missions that crash probes in to the moon, making it ring like a bell for hours. Proving that the moon is hollow.
I'm sorry... why does the moon's crust double in thickness after sunrise?
Though then the video contrasts "the dark side" which refers to the side that focus' away from Earth. So did the video (which showed the sun in the graphic) actually intend to refer to the face of the moon that faces Earth?
Just to be clear this is all just theory right? Or did we cut a planet in half and I didn't hear the news?
🤡
NASA released evidence of vast stores of water under the crust. And when a used craft was sent crashing into the surface, the moon rang for hours.
of course a perfectly vertical Lightsabre.
Why no talk about Venus or Uranus cores? Additionally I thought this video was about planet cores, how come it went on talking about Jupiter storm and other stuff?
Can’t help but notice you didn’t say what the core was on Jupiter. Likely because we actually don’t know. Could be a massive iron core with liquid rock for all we know. Too dense to make literally anything that could survive to find out.
Someone said this is their planet
Temperature: -217'F
Life: dont exist
If we went on the planet: die from freeze and toxic air that is poisonous
Rings: have 8 rings
Moons: 53 moons
Size: between Saturn and Jupiter
Color: grey, orange, red, white and grey
Core temperature: 45,000'F
Outer core temperature: 9,500'F
Mantle temperature: 800'F
Outer layers: 133'F
The inner part of the inner core temperature: 45,257'F
I'd love to see "What if, when the sun is nearing the end of its life, we were to dump Jupiter into it? How long would it extend the Sun's life or would it have more negative effects upon it?"
So how do we know what's inside the moon if we've never drilled that deep?
If it's a Science Doku, please use metric system first. Thanks.
But hey iys just a theory A SPACE THEORY
Also the great red spot isn’t a storm, it is actually a high-pressure/fair weather system
with the heat it produces, my money would be on a jovian vent belching hot gasses.
Oh, look... Another of those 'accent test' channels for training intelligence agents to work in the US.
Mars isn't "silent and docile". Insight measured a 4.2 marsquake on Sept 18, 2022...
Anybody else notice that some of the sound effects are from a game. The ones I recognize came from Mindustry, unless they are free to use sound effects.
Did you just show part of the cassini mission at 9:40 ?
Starts off well, then quickly veers off in all directions.
So the mars one is wrong. We have recorded mar quakes
W camera man
All these solid metal cores could be harvested in the future
Oh so that’s what the cores look like right we’ll take me because no one has ever been there to tell or take pictures of the cores 😅
Stopped at Mars. You may want to check your notes.
The bit with Earth suddenly becoming a Jupiter size might be a problem, but what if it always was like that?
it's all about science,and geologically it formed.
There is no "dark side" of the moon - while the Moon is tidally locked to Earth, both hemispheres receive the same amount of sunlight over time.
i saw ibella text in steaks livestream and SPOTTIE was like that’s it for your robux for your robux
Hilarious to think that we can be so absolutely certain of things we've never actually discovered. 🤣