Nordstream did not explode by itself. Ships do not explode by themselves and certainly not four ships in a period of a few weeks. This is clearly sabotage.
@@svendahlsten3132 Could just as well be lack of maintenance/space parts, or even smoking near fuel. Not everything is an attack. The link to Fico is laughable and not even explained in any way.
There's no obvious signs of damage on the outside so I guess it's just a mixture of Russian incompetence and poor maintenance like the other 3 Russian ships that sank earlier this week.
@@svendahlsten3132 You'd see marks on the outside from a boat drone attack or a missile. It's reported that there was an explosion in the engine room so maybe fuel vapours? I suppose if you're not going to blame either Russian incompetence or poor maintenance then there's a long list of folks willing to sink it: Syrian rebels, those in Africa unkeen on more Russian interference, Israel removing more Russian assets from the area or even Ukrainian sea drones. Considering you've lost 3 other ships this week, I'd just go with the easy answer of incompetence and poor maintenance.
@@mikebikekite1One ship sinking due to maintenance neglect might be written off as an unfortunate incident, but three in the same week defies plausibility. it reeks of sabotage. Now, with a plane departing Azerbaijan for Russia also crashing, the pattern is impossible to ignore. To claim Azerbaijan is also failing at basic maintenances is pure ignorance. This is no accident. something far more intentional is at play.
@@umbrellaCorp-r3q The 3 tankers that sank with designed purely for river work where their are no waves and each broke it's back when taken out into high seas. The ship that sank in the Med normally carries munitions between Russia and Tartarus. It was also being escorted by a Russian warship. Perhaps there was a failure there? I don't see any possible reason to down a civilian plane from Azerbaijan. There was also no indication of missiles or explosions on the video of the crash. It seems far more likely to be a maintenance issue. My heartfelt feelings go out to all those that died.
NATO Warmongers
It is something else.
Har roz russia ka ya koi nuksan hota hai ya beizzati. 😅
Its uncommon for only russian ships to face accidents
this is Russian technology.expiration date expired, ship sunk
Ice breaker parts being shipped from Syria - doesn't seem likely.
Think they were station and naval port in Syria that Russia has
Musik nervt 😮
Ukraine’s actions bring new strength to the fight for justice
"Actions" ..😅😅😅all these nazis knows is terrorism...just like the corrupt U.S A and our childish NATO...try again
NATO sub?
Drivel and utter rubbish. It would have sunk in seconds. Try being more mature in your approach to commenting.
Hopefully Ukraine brought a few Sea Babies to help the Russians remove stuff out of Syria
Russian incompetence.
Their own ships sink in the Kerch strait, quit blaming NATO for your own failures.
Russia shipping have NATO CIA EU USA dezies.
he ship had an explosion in the engine rooms, it has nothing to do with NATO or the EU.... what a shit channel
.. what do you expect from the Russianstan Times!
It means something came up from underneath in to the enginroom 🤔
Nordstream did not explode by itself. Ships do not explode by themselves and certainly not four ships in a period of a few weeks. This is clearly sabotage.
@@svendahlsten3132 Could just as well be lack of maintenance/space parts, or even smoking near fuel. Not everything is an attack. The link to Fico is laughable and not even explained in any way.
@ smoking dont put fire to diesel you shud know that 🤷♂️
Their ship sunk itself and then blame other people.
There's no obvious signs of damage on the outside so I guess it's just a mixture of Russian incompetence and poor maintenance like the other 3 Russian ships that sank earlier this week.
Hei mike can you see under the ship you must bee superman cos its taking in water benith the sealine
@@svendahlsten3132 You'd see marks on the outside from a boat drone attack or a missile. It's reported that there was an explosion in the engine room so maybe fuel vapours? I suppose if you're not going to blame either Russian incompetence or poor maintenance then there's a long list of folks willing to sink it: Syrian rebels, those in Africa unkeen on more Russian interference, Israel removing more Russian assets from the area or even Ukrainian sea drones. Considering you've lost 3 other ships this week, I'd just go with the easy answer of incompetence and poor maintenance.
@@mikebikekite1One ship sinking due to maintenance neglect might be written off as an unfortunate incident, but three in the same week defies plausibility. it reeks of sabotage. Now, with a plane departing Azerbaijan for Russia also crashing, the pattern is impossible to ignore. To claim Azerbaijan is also failing at basic maintenances is pure ignorance. This is no accident. something far more intentional is at play.
@@umbrellaCorp-r3q The 3 tankers that sank with designed purely for river work where their are no waves and each broke it's back when taken out into high seas. The ship that sank in the Med normally carries munitions between Russia and Tartarus. It was also being escorted by a Russian warship. Perhaps there was a failure there? I don't see any possible reason to down a civilian plane from Azerbaijan. There was also no indication of missiles or explosions on the video of the crash. It seems far more likely to be a maintenance issue. My heartfelt feelings go out to all those that died.
You mean like your recent f18 incident in the red sea? And the two f35 submarine incident some momths ago?
Haha That's 3 for three ships now Putie baby!
long range debris
It's a common thing with Russian ships, they won't sail for long.
and what about the BANDERITE NAZI CIRCUS ?
Houthis record unmatched
@@Ultra_Ego_Putin of doing nothing?
@@SnakePliskin762 Houthis destroyed over 100 NATO ships so far, butthurt NAFO
Шмуль, ты чо гонишь, йеблан?