ความคิดเห็น •

  • @doot9449
    @doot9449 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm only watching this for schoolwork 😗

  • @janellelincoln9530
    @janellelincoln9530 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    GOD bless you Mr Smith

  • @movieuser6336
    @movieuser6336 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So...someone explain to me how the 2nd Ammendment says shall not be infringed yet laws are continually being passed infringing upon the arms that the people can possess? Even the prevention of certain types of knives or automatic weapons by the Federal government. Does it all fall on how some judge wants to interpret the law?

    • @richardzellers
      @richardzellers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Partly because the BIG government advocate Alexander Hamilton's interpretation of the "necessary and proper" clause of Article I, sec 8 of the Const.

    • @marileedent8499
      @marileedent8499 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tyranny. Dictatorship Biden destroying our country

    • @MentallyLibtarded
      @MentallyLibtarded 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@richardzellersthank you for that

  • @janellekhlincoln4177
    @janellekhlincoln4177 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good Morning and thank you

  • @martylynchian8628
    @martylynchian8628 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So they can't they be more restrictive on immigration enforcement?

  • @DavidBerquist334
    @DavidBerquist334 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    at our land fill it is stealing to something let's say someone takes a lap top out of e waste bin it sold new for enough to be a felony and that person boards a airplane and reports it stolen from his checked luggage and it is found a tsa screenr stole it are both thefts the same or is federal more serious
    I'm not in a situation but just wondering how the law is and would view it thanks

  • @da-king3314
    @da-king3314 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn’t there just be a singular overarching law like federal laws instead of individual state laws ?

  • @theoetkers1798
    @theoetkers1798 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @DustinUhrig
    @DustinUhrig 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The monopolizing everything freedom of travel is in the Constitution you don't need a driver's license insurance or place to do your business traveling on our roads and highways

  • @BrianLopez-gz8ux
    @BrianLopez-gz8ux 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    James Patterson ?

  • @jackiekoski549
    @jackiekoski549 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How to get results from higher courts is the issue I am having.

    • @shoelessb4515
      @shoelessb4515 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jackie; you are basically out of luck. Even if you are a millionaire, and can hire excellent lawyers and create compelling argu ments for your position, the political views of members of the relevant court could mean that they simply refuse to hear the case. This is apparently ok for them to do. Fu*"in lawyers!!!

  • @Titanic19127
    @Titanic19127 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Exactly... when a state law such as mandatory quarantine or told to stay inside can clash with federal law and freedom.

    • @brandonzender5839
      @brandonzender5839 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Michigan's stay-at-home its order was ruled constitutional

    • @MentallyLibtarded
      @MentallyLibtarded 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@brandonzender5839yet it never was ....constitutional

  • @slongger
    @slongger 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What are the consequences for states directly violating the Constitution. Virginia

    • @avex4446
      @avex4446 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Slongger, There is no meaningful way to "punish" the United States or a State. Officers of the federal government who fail to perform their duties as required by the Constitution may be impeached and removed from office upon conviction

  • @altonlynch5464
    @altonlynch5464 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why are states passing laws that violate federal laws? like Roe vs wade?

    • @brianfisher5573
      @brianfisher5573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Row VS. Wade was a finding in the Supreme Court. In the judiciary, not the legislative branch that makes laws. The big mistake was leaving the right to abortion as an interpretation of law and not made an amendment to the constitution.

  • @henlohenlo689
    @henlohenlo689 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    you guys contradicted yourself. you said if state and federal contradict, then federal law wins, this means that federal minimum wage would WIN over state laws, which is not the case. those 2 things directly contradict each other and state law is supreme. or atleast that's how it is across the usa.
    article 6 is talking about how constitution is above all law makers and federal and state law. it's above everything including the president. all the law makers need to pass laws that are constitutional. state or federal laws can't contradict the constitution. federal law and constitutional law are NOT the same. the constitution is above federal law, this is article 6 talking about.

  • @kingjeremysircornwell7847
    @kingjeremysircornwell7847 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In America it is a crime to be a leaper, fun-gal disease is a crime.

  • @tommyrice647
    @tommyrice647 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool

  • @shoelessb4515
    @shoelessb4515 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In addition there are local county and city rules and regulations which have the force of law. So states, counties and cities can still create whatever they can get away with. This means you can be an honest law abiding citizen in your city, and be a felon in your county. You can also be an honest, law abiding citizen in your state and a felon in the state next door.
    Finally, a state resident cannot just invoke his Federal rights. You have to go to court, where various courts simply refuse to even hear your case!!! So, we are citizens of the U.S. and only pawns of the state government where you live. Minority opinions are totally disregarded and your only option is to move to a state where you like the state/ local laws better. You might have to give up your job, home or family to do so, but YOUR life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness are secondary to the tyranny of the majority.

  • @MESENJAH
    @MESENJAH 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This country's a mess...

  • @ieatapplepiewithchopsticks7355
    @ieatapplepiewithchopsticks7355 ปีที่แล้ว

    After watching this you realize you don't have to be an attorney to figure out you don't have to be attorney to know that Federal Laws do NOT trump state law if the original context of constitution did not delegate certain powers to the Federal Government and reserved to the states or the people . The US Constitution is the Law of the Land and the first 10 amendments are annumerated therefore in-alienable whether you burn the constitution or not. Only time when Federal Law trumps state law and when you're willing to roll over and take up the ass.

  • @RCYHS
    @RCYHS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So confusing 😂 logic dictate conflicts will arise when therea are two sovereign at the same time & place

  • @davidparsons6588
    @davidparsons6588 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It doesn't apply to the man and woman of God they are not our god giving Rights that's why I stay in the privete side and stay away from the public side of life

  • @Van-vc8dq
    @Van-vc8dq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    helpful video but these guys are NERDS

    • @foreverneverever7151
      @foreverneverever7151 ปีที่แล้ว

      If those guys weren’t “nerds”, then the video wouldn’t have been helpful.