Yau5 Method Overview for 5x5

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • Planning to make more Yau 5 videos! Let me know what you want to see.
    Cube: Cubicle WuShuang M
    My color scheme: bit.ly/1G7NiWW
    My cuber ProFile: bit.ly/1Oi65BY
    My website with 2x2 algs and more: bit.ly/18dgBbB
    Facebook: www.facebook.c...

ความคิดเห็น • 196

  • @JPerm
    @JPerm 6 ปีที่แล้ว +296

    Yay a tutorial! Missed these

  • @SomeRandomFellow
    @SomeRandomFellow 6 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    woah. i tried yau5 a while ago, and quickly abandoned it because i did it the same way as yau4. you just opened my eyes, and i am currently very seriously considering switching to this now. thank you, chris

  • @ejbock5b179
    @ejbock5b179 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Awesome tutorial/overview, I wasn't aware of how yau 5 actually worked, and after the heartland championships I will be making the change from redux to yau.

  • @bossatlife
    @bossatlife 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    You can solve the first 2 f2l pairs anywhere and if they are diag just do an L or R' (to put that pair into the back) then do last 4 edges
    Edit: nvm just watched the whole vid. My bad!

    • @gigglepencil5433
      @gigglepencil5433 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wait why can’t you that seems like it would make sense

  • @hellgate25000
    @hellgate25000 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Interesting. I actually didn’t know about the last cross edge technique.
    From what I see, it seems that yau5 and redux seem equally effective for 5x5 - as you showed that the pros and cons really do go against each other. I think if you prefer systematic methods and can nail, yau is a better option. Well as if you prefer a more freestyle but more efficient approach, then redux is better. Personally I use redux, averaging around 55-56, primarily because I’ve trained myself on efficiency and look ahead from bigger cubes (where I think redux is definitely better). I do think yau is likely a better option for 3 and 4 solvers.

    • @jamesquinn728
      @jamesquinn728 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jayden showed it off in his 4-7 wakthrough vid thats like half an hour, i find it best on 4x4

    • @rwu0812
      @rwu0812 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      3?

    • @nabranestwistypuzzler7019
      @nabranestwistypuzzler7019 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ryan Wu Like they do 3 & 4, so they use Yau. 3x3 obviously isn’t Yau.

    • @stevy2318
      @stevy2318 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jamesquinn728 can you give me the link for that video?

    • @jamesquinn728
      @jamesquinn728 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stevy2318 lol year old comment
      watch?v=zXz-Nugo3i8

  • @AndrewTyberg
    @AndrewTyberg 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting. I assumed it was just like Yau4 scaled up.

  • @jonathanbai9874
    @jonathanbai9874 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I personally think Reduction is still way better...
    btw, what method does feliks use for 5x5

  • @tobi.st3
    @tobi.st3 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amanzing video :) Can you do a video for the edgepairing because I dont really get it. I know 3-2-3 on 4x4 but on 5x5 i'm really a noob :) (like 3:50min average..)

  • @rocicubes
    @rocicubes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I got my first 5x5 today, I've learned beginners method and now I'm trying to learn this method

    • @Lucitik_
      @Lucitik_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ikr last edge sucks

  • @LevMaslov
    @LevMaslov 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You can actually solve all the edges before doing f2l. Ciaran Beahan have some walkthrough solves with this method and he is the fastest. Also you can insert 3rd cross edge incorrectly, then do your centers and after that solve your last cross edge and insert it in the correct spot without messing up the centers. There are too many options!

    • @Muffins3001
      @Muffins3001 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lev Maslov I've always solved my 3rd cross edge incorrectly. I find its way faster than solving it correctly. But I've been doing it for like 4-5 years. I definitely see why people do it correctly.

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah, people mention Ciaran a lot. From what I've heard, doing L4E his way is a lot more inefficient though. But right now it's just too early in the method to say which way is actually better.
      The incorrect cross edge is certainly another method, I just know that a lot of 4x4 solvers don't like that because of having more things to keep track of so I haven't tried it for 5x5. But who knows, maybe it's just because they aren't used to it. Lots of development still needs to happen. :)

  • @joshuabloch8814
    @joshuabloch8814 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yes! So glad you made this! Also, I finally managed to switch edge flip algs to yours, thanks!

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Joshua Bloch wooo! That's the next video.

  • @sethsolves5522
    @sethsolves5522 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm regretting that I haven't switched until now but oh well. I'm still not that good and it's tempting to go back to reduction to start getting sub 1:20 again. But I think that's why so many people were hesitant to switch to the new method because why try something new when you already know that WR's (Or in my case sub 1:00's) are possible. Great overview of the method.

  • @Blitzfrrb55
    @Blitzfrrb55 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This video is so freaking satisfying. The solves and turns are so smooth.
    I will try to learn this method, as you make it look super easy

  • @theohall8844
    @theohall8844 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am completely beginner on 5x5, and don't know what method to use, should I use Yau5 or Reduction?

    • @dakevinmg
      @dakevinmg 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Theo. Cube I’d say learn to solve with redux and then switch to Yau if you want to. Redux is easier to learn

  • @Marci2707
    @Marci2707 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think its to fast and unclear for beginners

  • @AutisticNotWeird
    @AutisticNotWeird 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know this is an old video, but you just converted me to Yau5. :) Thanks a lot for the crystal clear introduction!

  • @kumaravinash4172
    @kumaravinash4172 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can u explain thoda slowly slowly

  • @almach6279
    @almach6279 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about the following method: solve centers and cross like shown in the video. For l8e, solve the wing edges like 3-2-3 on a 4x4. Then, solve the middle edges with another "3-2-3", but using the middle slice rather than Uw.
    Has anybody ever tried this?

  • @JujuSeb444
    @JujuSeb444 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting video! I use Hoya5 but I learnt a couple of useful tricks/new ways of solving that I didn't know about for edge pairing. Hopefully I can get sub1:10 soon thanks to that!

  • @cubeultimate8061
    @cubeultimate8061 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video!!! Keep making great content.:)

  • @turbocuber2873
    @turbocuber2873 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I actually came up with a similar method for 4x4, after I learned Yau4 I didn't like 3-2-3 edge pairing because you have to look at the back, so I solved the back F2L pairs and did edge pairing with front slots

  • @darkinertia2
    @darkinertia2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    jesus your turning is so smooth lol you make me look like im on a vcube

  • @sulakshanas314
    @sulakshanas314 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    U r the best cuber

  • @wagon7052
    @wagon7052 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i watched the whole video its awesome but when i saw sub 1min solve at the end of the vid i was shocked because i cant solve a 4by4 in under 2 minutes

  • @ravensiIva
    @ravensiIva ปีที่แล้ว

    Used yau5 for a bit because i thought it was the same as yau4 so i abandoned it. Now using hoya on 5, it felt good and i practiced for a week and got pb. Looking at this, i wanna try switching back.

  • @rahulsahay7330
    @rahulsahay7330 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I too think that it is an underused method. Will help me too much, and JPERM too. Thanks

  • @freakverse5310
    @freakverse5310 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don’t do yau five exactly I do a combination of yau 5 and reduction whilst solving 3 x 3 stage at the same time

  • @swastikjoshi
    @swastikjoshi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lit af TPS

  • @laiscube
    @laiscube 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Form the start of my 5x5 speedcubing I have been using a different method which I call Yau 4, (2 centres, 3 edges, 4 centres, last cross edge, freeslice 4 edges, last 4 edges, 4 F2Ls, OLL PLL), and reduction on 6x6+, but after giving Yau 5 a try earlier this year, I found that last 4 edges was incredibly strong. It's easy to be efficient because you can almost always achieve 2 purposes with every slice-insert-slice back. Eventually I switched to Yau 5 from 5x5-9x9, and my averages dropped significantly. How I do Yau 5 is slightly different. (2 centres, 3 edges, 4 centres, last cross edge, freeslice 4 edges including 2 F2L edges, 2 F2Ls, last 4 edges, 2F2Ls, OLL PLL)

  • @phily2690
    @phily2690 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    10:15 Feliks has had at least one 5-second 3x3 stage with redux (on one of his wrs)

    • @harvomusic
      @harvomusic 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah but he's feliks

  • @mizaanali7284
    @mizaanali7284 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1k th liker

  • @rashyboy4706
    @rashyboy4706 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If u don't mind me asking, what cube did u use in the vid?

  • @KnuxMaster368
    @KnuxMaster368 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hoya5 > Yau5
    Do learn both

  • @ParisDorn159
    @ParisDorn159 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yesss you finally released this. I'm averaging like 1:10 with both yau5 and redux, hopefully I can improve a lot faster with yau

  • @j.r.chen30
    @j.r.chen30 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ya wee whee

  • @awkwardfoxxo8050
    @awkwardfoxxo8050 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude i need practice but yau5 is awesome

  • @isabellacorona9883
    @isabellacorona9883 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you mean when you say solve the last 4 edges by using cycles? I don’t completely understand what you mean by using cycles.

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      When you slice to pair an edge, the edge you put into replace the solved one needs to be correct for the other edge.
      I can't think of a great way to explain it in text. You're basically always solving 2 pieces instead of 1 at a time.

  • @bryanheaton8896
    @bryanheaton8896 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Actually revolutionary.

  • @burntout4
    @burntout4 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do u use to set up your 5*5?
    Weight-5?

  • @tacocubes6108
    @tacocubes6108 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video Chris! It's also very timely! Today I decided to get into 5x5 and try to get down to sub1:20. I've been 1:30-1:40 for a long time now and I just don't seem to be going anywhere fast with redux soon (pun somewhat intended). I'll be giving yau5 a try!

  • @aaronstettner5665
    @aaronstettner5665 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hoya5 gang anyone? Anyone else like me?

  • @eseilawimpershlaak
    @eseilawimpershlaak 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh! Didnt know that Yau5 is so different. I tried to adapt Yau4 to 5 a while back which didnt really work out. Ill give it another try!

  • @appleanzivino987
    @appleanzivino987 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    He looks like the bee in the bee movie

  • @bubba_supreme1128
    @bubba_supreme1128 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you keep all four cross edges intact while making the four centers? I can keep three of them intact, but I always break the 4th one.

  • @athulartstudio
    @athulartstudio 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome tutorial!! I usually use Redux, but I am considering switching!! Legitemenly the best/only good Yau5 tutorial.

  • @rikishikato5001
    @rikishikato5001 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is kinda... complicated
    I'll try Yau 6 using this method

  • @samuel6736
    @samuel6736 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the brand of that 5x5?

  • @matthewellis7121
    @matthewellis7121 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whats up guyyyyyyyyyyyyyyys!!!!!😁

  • @hardcuber7443
    @hardcuber7443 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there possible to do half Centers on 5x5 it is so hard for me to do Centers on normal way ( I avarage 42 on 4x4 with yau but I only use half centers)

    • @DRKongo-vi8ok
      @DRKongo-vi8ok 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      HardProo Cuber there isnt

    • @DRKongo-vi8ok
      @DRKongo-vi8ok 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      nema

    • @DRKongo-vi8ok
      @DRKongo-vi8ok 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      you can but I think its easier normal way (cao)

  • @regen-Q
    @regen-Q 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still using Redux

  • @TeboeCubes
    @TeboeCubes 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So... why can't you just use regular Yau on a 5x5? What advantage does this have over it?

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can, but it's generally considered to be more efficient to do it this way. Many people just use normal Yau, but I'm not a fan.

  • @LOQUENDOABSTRACT7773
    @LOQUENDOABSTRACT7773 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm very bad in 5x5 hmm i will practice more

  • @willwalter1384
    @willwalter1384 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Free slice is sueprior

  • @cubesmart3622
    @cubesmart3622 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a thing? Lol

  • @ddimmee9211
    @ddimmee9211 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is great vid

  • @kvisotmz8118
    @kvisotmz8118 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow very nice 👌

  • @SaneTheBro
    @SaneTheBro 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    My favorite event is 17x17 OH

    • @DRKongo-vi8ok
      @DRKongo-vi8ok 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      inSane no 17 of + bld (one foot)

  • @rocketleaves9651
    @rocketleaves9651 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about roux

  • @felix-lk7ic
    @felix-lk7ic 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been using yau5 for the past few weeks and I can tell it's going to beat out reduction by a lot.

  • @cardologist
    @cardologist 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    note that ciaran and xuming don't do the 2 F2L pairs bit. Xuming is mid 50s and ciaran is low 50s. Just something to think about!

    • @BrandonNunez
      @BrandonNunez 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      cardologist most people already know of this, but there is a lot of people saying it is less efficient, although I do the same at ciaran and I feel that it is both ergonomically better and more fluid, there might eventually be a point where this will be better. As of now the method is way to underdeveloped to know which is better

  • @hehcuber2743
    @hehcuber2743 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are a king

  • @kadthecuber
    @kadthecuber 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! This was very helpful!

  • @prouan1
    @prouan1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    yau5 vs hoya5?

  • @oldaccount5357
    @oldaccount5357 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kewl

  • @ParisDorn159
    @ParisDorn159 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:38 why didnt you solve the red/blue pair???
    nothing wrong with diagonal pairs, it's literally a one move setup lol

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I purposely didn't do that to keep it simple. I'm saving stuff like that for future videos. There's a lot of stuff in here that I would have done differently if not for the sake of example. :)

  • @Treeguygarrett
    @Treeguygarrett 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    When solving a 5x5 can you use 3_2_3 edge pairing like in a 4x4

  • @liampower2658
    @liampower2658 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which cube?

  • @cookiequeen5430
    @cookiequeen5430 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool video! I use ZZ on 5x5 with a similar concept :)

  • @MichiSport
    @MichiSport 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Video

  • @notgreen11
    @notgreen11 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool vid Chris, might try it out when I go for plat

  • @DailyCuber
    @DailyCuber 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been using yau 5 for a very long time now.

  • @cuber4047
    @cuber4047 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good

  • @papiachatterjee3772
    @papiachatterjee3772 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    good

  • @dabbermanxd883
    @dabbermanxd883 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    When I got my first 4x4 I went straight to yau, no behinners. When I got my first 5x5 I didn't even look it up I just solved it like a 4x4, and I still haven't looked up a 5x5 tutorial. I just do opposite centers, then the 4 remaining centers (doing cross edges beforehand doesn't seem beneficial). After that I just solve the edges and then 3x3 stage. Is the way in the video more efficient than this?

  • @achyutanm2351
    @achyutanm2351 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dang I taught yau 5 was same as yau4!!!BTW awesome tps 👍

  • @BrandonNunez
    @BrandonNunez 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ew no Chris yau on 5x5 which means AVG edges or freeslice

  • @shihabsahel1325
    @shihabsahel1325 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    what cube r using in this video??

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shihab Sahel cubicle wushuang M. I always try to put it in the description. :)

  • @hehcuber2743
    @hehcuber2743 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This also saved me from using redux

  • @BrandonNunez
    @BrandonNunez 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You don't need to always make the cross edge it is just one way of doing last cross edge

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That's true, and something I thought about after creating this. But I personally think it is worse to do the cross edge after your centers.

    • @tfreshcuber6307
      @tfreshcuber6307 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Brandon Nunez i think im going to do the cross edge after just because its less i have to keep track of during my last 4 centers

  • @rubiksdude8953
    @rubiksdude8953 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Noice. Finally have a good understanding of this

  • @archanamali6771
    @archanamali6771 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still redux is faster(at least for me)

    • @goalsoncubes3802
      @goalsoncubes3802 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      feliks is using yau5 now. not sure about yau6 or yau7 tho

  • @ParisDorn159
    @ParisDorn159 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait hold on, I thought only Jay uses that last cross edge technique and that it isn't common to do at all

    • @jamesquinn728
      @jamesquinn728 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      its gud

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting. I feel like this is how I see most people approach it. Rob Yau does this as well.

    • @ParisDorn159
      @ParisDorn159 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't like doing it simply because I already usually see really good centres after the first three and solving the last one before last centre would break them up. If you don't know how to solve it after centres efficiently, then you probably aren't doing it right. If you didn't know already, you have to do inserts such as U R2 U' R2 and U' F' R' F R to insert the last cross edge if you do it after centres to preserve them (since you freeslice the last cross edge)

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I know how it works. I just haven't found I prefer it.

  • @yusufragab1674
    @yusufragab1674 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got in an argument with my friend about freeslice vs. yau5, he said he’ll try one solve with yau and he’s embarrassed about how he said freeslice was better lmao
    Ofc freeslice is good too, but he now thinks yau is better

  • @kindasomthing2508
    @kindasomthing2508 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yau 17x17

  • @fortlynne10
    @fortlynne10 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:22

  • @stephenm.791
    @stephenm.791 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First

  • @kileharvey
    @kileharvey 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    More videos from the legendary Chris Olsen

  • @asdf14051
    @asdf14051 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    are you going to great lakes championship? is anyone else going?

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Arjun Anand I hope I can!

    • @asdf14051
      @asdf14051 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      cyotheking you replied!! I hope you come!

  • @DanaYi13
    @DanaYi13 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    After nats :)

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You said after heartland!

    • @DanaYi13
      @DanaYi13 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Whoops wrong comp. After heartland!

  • @DJ-tx3ux
    @DJ-tx3ux 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    For me it's just better to solve it normal like Yau on 4x4 as I am used to it. Does any 5x5 Yau solvers do the same?

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      People have different variations of yau5, but I would say that this is probably one of the more popular methods of doing it.

  • @awesomefactor319
    @awesomefactor319 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Once I used yau5 then I switched to roux

  • @aayammathur2484
    @aayammathur2484 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which 2x2 would you recommend? (i am a beginner). Maybe wuxia or 249 v2, plz tell

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aayam Mathur Neither. Chuwen M or Chuwen.

    • @aayammathur2484
      @aayammathur2484 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      cyotheking any particular reason for that?

    • @AndrewTyberg
      @AndrewTyberg 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cyotheking is a 3-time world record holder in 2x2. He's a great person to ask.

    • @aayammathur2484
      @aayammathur2484 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Andrew Tyberg ikr. That is why I asked him

    • @aayammathur2484
      @aayammathur2484 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      cyotheking fine then i will take the chuwen

  • @ALEXANDRESpeedcubing
    @ALEXANDRESpeedcubing 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use Hoya 5!

  • @sunilmishraifs
    @sunilmishraifs 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just brilliant bro

  • @leemingchak940
    @leemingchak940 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chris I love the logo on your 5x5 where did you get it? Great video!

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      From my girlfriend!

  • @teunkemmerling9552
    @teunkemmerling9552 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, nice tutorial! I've been enjoying trying this new method but I have a question, how do you handle the last edge parity? Because doing the algoritm to fix that kinda ruins they f2l you had already done, so do you or anyone else in the comments have a tip for this or maybe an alternative algoritm?

    • @cyotheking
      @cyotheking  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just try to force it so that it's a yellow edge that had parity. Then you can do it after OLL. If it ends up being an F2L edge, you can do F or F' to put it in the U layer, do parity then undo the setup move.

    • @teunkemmerling9552
      @teunkemmerling9552 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      cyotheking Thanks for the quick reply, really appreciate it! And yes, this doesn't ruin it, thanks!

  • @isaachewitt863
    @isaachewitt863 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is such a great tutorial!!

  • @burntout4
    @burntout4 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    TPS is lit in the solves!

  • @vishantsatpalsolanki3600
    @vishantsatpalsolanki3600 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice tutorial chris

  • @twistiicuber1055
    @twistiicuber1055 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Can you apply 4x4 algs on a 5x5?

    • @alexpaschal8154
      @alexpaschal8154 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      TonyTheAsian no

    • @867star
      @867star 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Depends. Which algs are you concerned about.

    • @Paints
      @Paints 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, but the same logic applies, like for pairing up edges or making centers.

    • @goalsoncubes3802
      @goalsoncubes3802 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep

    • @micahgilbertcubing5911
      @micahgilbertcubing5911 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The specific algs are different, but the idea of combining centers and pairing edges remains. It's called the reduction method because you 'reduce' the cube to a 3x3, and the method applies infinitely for NxNxN cubes