I absolutely love how you commentate these games. As someone who's chess experience is a bunch of games played in homeroom in high school you describe the games in a way that is simultaneously interesting, informative, and easy to follow. Please keep up the great work!
Let's have a look: 1 - AlphaZero and the Mastery of Chess 2 - AlphaZero and the French Defense Lesson 3 - AlphaZero and the Synergy Demonstration 4 - AlphaZero and the Deadly Bishop Pair 5 - AlphaZero and the Protected Passed Pawn This makes me super eager for books 6-10
Humans are taught that the goal of chess is to checkmate the enemy king. AlphaZero has taught itself that the goal should really be to checkmate the light-square bishop.
It's fascinating to me that Stockfish was still rating itself favorable when the light square bishop was trapped and not contributing. I think the people who program it are going to have to seriously reevaluate their algorithms after this series, to appreciate certain positional deficits for what they are.
Well, you have to understand, chess is so complex that to brute force solve it would require more information than the universe is capable of holding. (10^120 positions, 10^80 observable particles.) So you have to use heuristics. And sometimes that leads to valuing material even though it doesn't do anything.
@@AndrewBlechinger no since most of those permutaions are illegal, a larger proportion are nonsensical, and large databases underline openings and endgames so its more likely tactics in the middle game whih is closer to 10^9
Christian Lund Overall, I'd say chess is the most toxic and cruel community I've ever experienced. But there are some pleasant niches, like the comment sections on Jerry's videos for instance.
"Soon, all of the white pieces will be attacking the black king. And guess who's not around? This guy; he's garbage!" *Throws black's light-square bishop off the board* This part had me laughing so hard. Such a wonderful analysis of this game and the importance of controlling space.
@@ATMOSK1234 we can still train neural network to evaluate their position, even if we don't know how they do so. I am pretty sure AZ has a numerical evaluation since its freely availible concurent, leela chess zero, has one.
I love these Alphazero videos Jerry! Your commentary on them really helps me to understand the thought processes behind each move. Keep up the great work!
I think this game out of the 10 demonstrates the most how differently alpha zero plays from a normal engine. Its saying to itself that my position in the future will be good even though its not at the time it sacs the pawn, like a human player it thinks this "must" be good I just dont see it yet.Very much like Go where the player is trying to set up favourable conditions on board.
_"I've no idea if it even has an evaluation function or how it works"_ While Stockfish do brute force search, AlphaZero skips irrelevant moves and focus on those moves which looks promising, like a human would do.
That just means that humans are not playing correctly. If you read the Encyclopedia of Chess Middlegames (ECM), temporary imbalances in material due to a trapped piece occur all the time. It's like a power-play in hockey. Most humans just lack the technique to pull it off on the level of an AlphaZero, but that will one day not be the case. A human can recognize the smothered mate instantly. What we're seeing is that the computers understand calculus while the humans have barely solved algebra. That too will change. A human should be able to draw every game and one day will, in part thanks to what the computers are teaching us. I've already resumed my old style of "Tal" like sacrifices that I had assumed Stockfish proved were unsound, but which actually are sound, just above the level of even a 3300-rated machine.
Watching the structure slowly shift to favor A0 is crazy. Such a subtle progression, but by move 18 the effects of the pawn structure are brutal. I see that happen to me when I play better players, but usually it's not as radical as this, where black's bishop is completely cut off from play.
Thank you Jerry I like how you analyze every detail and answer all of my "what if..." questions. I like that you let the engine run to move 40 to explain the pawn move. Thanks.
Done with school for the year. Now it's time to finally binge watch the Alpha Zero vs Stockfish games. I'm just going to press the like button before watching.
Love your videos Jerry... Clear, understandable and Informative... I watched some Alpha0 videos from other chess channels and they just lose me on the alternative moves... Pieces flying all over the place in quick succession and no lines like you do (my head spins)... I feel like playing Chess after watching your videos. They are the best on TH-cam and Twitch... Please do more Alpha0 so I don't get head spin 😁👍
in fact deepmind Alpha Zero lost some games to stockfish. there were 1000 games between them, you can find it on the paper they disponibilized and in some youtube videos covering that subject. :}
Yea they published 100 games but they had many more played. I am assuming they do not want to publish them all because they want to analyze how the AI in each program is learning and adjusting to each other so they can sell that information. It is worth MILLIONS to programmers involved with advanced AI industries.
Great video again Jerry. Love to hear you analyzing games, you're the best. They must renamed AlphaZero the "Bishops Killer", once again he was so good at neutralizing those :-)
Damn I learned something new in chess, so not only did the AI not kill the useless bishop but as if the ai knew it's technically dead and not really there as long as he block those pawns, the bishop just sat there waiting for his appointment all day till it was too late, Gg.
pls make more videos on super computer matches.... Its really instructive.... The way of looking at chess is changed after seeing the games of alpha zero.... Thank u so much for the videos.... Really improve my game
AZ has been brutally targeting blacks light square bishop in these games. Typical weakness of alpha beta based engines (SF etc.) is being able to spot pieces that are trapped long term. It's the same type of weakness that makes them bad at properly evaluating fortress positions.
I would be curious to hear you thoughts on the stockfish suggestions shown on the right. Sometimes they differ from what stockfish in the game does but also the moves are not discussed by you as bad moves. E.G. at 11:30 it suggest Ra3, with a depth of 27.
At 8:25 (black to move) what's wrong with pawn f5 forking the knight and queen? White could capture on f6 with either the pawn (en passant) or the knight (checking the king). Either way after the exchanges the queen and the rook (black) would form a nice battery on an uncontested half-open f file.
I wonder if self-learning AI could turn into a problem for chess, in that it'd be more difficult to catch cheaters; if new, better AI make more human-like moves and decisions, it may be more difficult to catch what would previously be obvious engine moves.
You make a good point. It will be more difficult for human players to detect the kind of style indicative of cheating at first glance; however, cheaters on chess websites such as lichess are caught using statistical analysis. Admins look at how often the computer agrees with their moves and simply applies t-tests to reveal cheaters. The kind of machinery used by google's deep mind is too specialized and powerful to be commercially available in the foreseeable future, so it is unlikely that we'll see cheaters using alphazero specifically. But I am excited to see the improvements the stockfish community makes to their engine, even if they continue to use search algorithms and opening books instead of deep neural nets. Exciting times in the world of chess engines.
Indeed, I hope a standard Chess engine prevails over this A0 soon. Even though my guess is that A0-style of AI is superior to the standard Stockfish one in the long run. I hope that a a standard stockfish can beat A0 soon.
Me being me Aren't you just punishing people for good chess, in that case? It basically would become impossible for a real upset to occur in chess, because they must have cheated- and that would take a lot of the fun out of things.
The "bad bishop" is a well known concept that doesn't require a computer to exploit. Many human players have played sacrifices like the one AZ played but not with this level of technique.
11:30 what if instead of Qd8 we have Ra3 (not a2, a3) threatening to take that bishop. If the bishop moves to say b2 Rb3 or even c3. If bishop to e4 the rook can take that bishop (on c3) and if the queen is taken the rook falls with check and the bishop is picked up afterwards with a dangerous past pawn. (winning a net piece) If after Re3 something like Be1 (now Be4 is a legitimate threat) Qb3 seems like a good idea with a future of moves like Qb2 and c3. It's a lot more active play from black to be sure.
Quick question at 11:02 Why wouldn't white just push Bishop to h7? Bishop h7, Black King takes, White Queen takes f7, if the rook comes out to defend the black-tile bishop, then either queen could take the pawn or the rook could push to the a-file and work from there... I assume there's a reason but can someone point it out?
At 8:41 the commentator suggests Qc7 as an option for black, but it seems to me that white will punish that with Nxe6! After fxe6 Qxe6+ follows, and then the white queen takes the bishop on e7, thus winning a pawn
My plan as black at move 14 (7:23) would have been Qc7, Nd7, at some point long castles, and maybe actually c5. No danger on the kingside anymore, all targets are gone
At 8:50 is it possible to completely ignore the attack on the bishop and play Nb6. You'll be giving away the bishop for free, but it's already a dead piece. Obviously this isn't good, but as a practical try it doesn't seem bad.
I dunno why, but i was first scared at how good Alpha0 is at chess and at go, something like this with its ways of playing, to me is very intimidating just thinking of playing against, how can you best something that is already 12 moves ahead of your current move variation. But now i realize that this is an opportunity to learn from something as smart as it! Analysing, discussing and dissecting its movements, has enabled viewers to be able to learn to improve their games.
I want Jerry to become a tough-love guidance counselor who lectures young bishops about what they plan on doing with their futures.
lol
I absolutely love how you commentate these games. As someone who's chess experience is a bunch of games played in homeroom in high school you describe the games in a way that is simultaneously interesting, informative, and easy to follow. Please keep up the great work!
Jerry, your videos have not only reignited my interest in chess, they have opened my eyes to the sheer beauty of this game. Thank you bro.
+James Buck Great to read James 👍🏼
The title sounds like some Harry Potter book
Let's have a look:
1 - AlphaZero and the Mastery of Chess
2 - AlphaZero and the French Defense Lesson
3 - AlphaZero and the Synergy Demonstration
4 - AlphaZero and the Deadly Bishop Pair
5 - AlphaZero and the Protected Passed Pawn
This makes me super eager for books 6-10
Raiderhorn I hope they don't split the seventh one up into two parts
let’s hope AlphaZero never gets the Elder Wand or we’re all doomed
Raiderhorn
6 - AlphaZero and the Golden Queen Knight.
7 - AlphaZero and the Dark Square Domination
Alpha Zero HATES that light square bishop
It must have a dark side....
To be honest, it's Stockfish, who never properly uses the LSB just to block him right after, let's say a one-move attack.
+Qaser7 Yes but it's amazing that Stockfish doesn't realize how it plays the opening, (in spite of 70,000 knps), that it dooms it's LSB.
That's racist cuz of double standards
Humans are taught that the goal of chess is to checkmate the enemy king. AlphaZero has taught itself that the goal should really be to checkmate the light-square bishop.
We should also remember that this stockfish guy that gets demolished by A0 is the same Stockfish guy that demolish the top human players in the world.
A0 treats Stockfish like a patzer, and Stockfish treats the best humans who ever played chess like patzers.
This is stockfish 8. I want to see alpha take on number 10.
Alpha "I hate light-squared bishops" Zero
Alpha "I capture away from the centre" Zero =b
Bobby Fischer’s favourite chess piece was a light square Bishop. There’s something going on here...
Alpha "I don't castle" Zero
the "Zero" stands for the opponent's light square bishop, because that piece will have "zero" influence in the game
I'm obsessed with AlphaZero. Great video as always Jerry.
I'm at an absolute loss for words. This is purely amazing! Jerry, thank you so much for your incredible work!
It's fascinating to me that Stockfish was still rating itself favorable when the light square bishop was trapped and not contributing. I think the people who program it are going to have to seriously reevaluate their algorithms after this series, to appreciate certain positional deficits for what they are.
Well, you have to understand, chess is so complex that to brute force solve it would require more information than the universe is capable of holding. (10^120 positions, 10^80 observable particles.) So you have to use heuristics. And sometimes that leads to valuing material even though it doesn't do anything.
@@AndrewBlechinger no since most of those permutaions are illegal, a larger proportion are nonsensical, and large databases underline openings and endgames so its more likely tactics in the middle game whih is closer to 10^9
TH-cam comments are just different in Jerry's videos. Never seen so much people happy
I think it's a chess thing.
Christian Lund
...even though chess is a game about ruthlessly trying to slay the enemy?
Chess isn't about death. It's about life.
Jay Starr
And yet pieces only die.
Christian Lund Overall, I'd say chess is the most toxic and cruel community I've ever experienced. But there are some pleasant niches, like the comment sections on Jerry's videos for instance.
"Soon, all of the white pieces will be attacking the black king. And guess who's not around? This guy; he's garbage!" *Throws black's light-square bishop off the board*
This part had me laughing so hard. Such a wonderful analysis of this game and the importance of controlling space.
You are a very good story teller Jerry....😄
You make every move feel like the move of the game....👍🏻😄
Jerry you are amazing at explaining the AlphaZero logic in these videos!
I love how Stockfish believes he is still winning on move 27, while AlphaZero already knew he was winning from move 13.
Surely that is one of the most amazing aspects of these games... It's really mind blowing.
Absit Reverentia Vero
Where did you get the info of alpha's evaluation?
Does Alpha even have a numeric evaluation? I thought neural networks were black boxes.
@@ATMOSK1234 we can still train neural network to evaluate their position, even if we don't know how they do so. I am pretty sure AZ has a numerical evaluation since its freely availible concurent, leela chess zero, has one.
ooh, what a burn at the very end by alpha zero
I love these Alphazero videos Jerry! Your commentary on them really helps me to understand the thought processes behind each move. Keep up the great work!
I think this game out of the 10 demonstrates the most how differently alpha zero plays from a normal engine. Its saying to itself that my position in the future will be good even though its not at the time it sacs the pawn, like a human player it thinks this "must" be good I just dont see it yet.Very much like Go where the player is trying to set up favourable conditions on board.
Max Pheby This is fascinating
I've no idea if it even has an evaluation function or how it works
Main reason Alpha Zero is so strong is its evaluation function which is a trained neural network
_"I've no idea if it even has an evaluation function or how it works"_
While Stockfish do brute force search, AlphaZero skips irrelevant moves and focus on those moves which looks promising, like a human would do.
Max, I agree.
That just means that humans are not playing correctly. If you read the Encyclopedia of Chess Middlegames (ECM), temporary imbalances in material due to a trapped piece occur all the time. It's like a power-play in hockey. Most humans just lack the technique to pull it off on the level of an AlphaZero, but that will one day not be the case. A human can recognize the smothered mate instantly. What we're seeing is that the computers understand calculus while the humans have barely solved algebra. That too will change. A human should be able to draw every game and one day will, in part thanks to what the computers are teaching us. I've already resumed my old style of "Tal" like sacrifices that I had assumed Stockfish proved were unsound, but which actually are sound, just above the level of even a 3300-rated machine.
It's strange to see you review matches between two programs, but you are analyzing and explaining so well! Keep it up please!
You're spoiling us, Jerry!
Is this a meme? I see this on many of Jerry's videos recently XD
Hm, it might be. I haven't seen it though...
This is the best analysis of game 8 that I found on the net. Thanks !
you read my mind
Probably the best in-depth analysis of this game by anyone I saw online... Keep up the good work...
You explain chess calmly and thoroughly!! Great teacher...Thank you!
Thanks😎
clown on a6 XD
Died when he said that
Jerry you are so cruel. Poor Stockfish you are going to give it a complex.
That's exactly when I lost it
When you want to contribute in the game, but you're just a clown on a6
lmao was gonna post that
I've watched other Alpha Zero analyses... nobody else comes close. More please!
I find your analyses to be not only very instructive but also eminently enjoyable. Great work!
I absolutely love AZ commentary at the end of each of these videos. It's so awesome
Watching the structure slowly shift to favor A0 is crazy. Such a subtle progression, but by move 18 the effects of the pawn structure are brutal. I see that happen to me when I play better players, but usually it's not as radical as this, where black's bishop is completely cut off from play.
One day I would like to hear what stockfish has to say..
=D
4:33 "One more move before I'd like to pause for a moment" I like how this was also a relevant and true statement, outside its intended meaning
AlphaZero really likes to make Stockfish's light square bishop look like a clown/tall pawn/spectator (pick your favourite).
free food
I like tall pawn
@@silverzero9524 Bro you played miscrits? :(
@@user-kl8vj2qy9w yes :(
@@user-kl8vj2qy9w i thought Pokemon Go would be somewhat like miscrits probably better but was disappointed :(
As chess commentary goes it simply doesn't get any better. Thanks Jerry.
Thank you for all your very clear analyses. Every move makes sense and is educational by how you present these videos. Subbed!
I am a simple man, I see a Jerry's video, I upvote
You're so funny!
9gag influences all
Repeating old memes in the youtube comments; you certainly are a simple man.
Thank you Jerry I like how you analyze every detail and answer all of my "what if..." questions. I like that you let the engine run to move 40 to explain the pawn move. Thanks.
Jerry, its not cool to leave us waiting for so long! Your analysis is the best!
Done with school for the year. Now it's time to finally binge watch the Alpha Zero vs Stockfish games. I'm just going to press the like button before watching.
Another fantastic analysis, thanks Jerry! I wish you a merry Christmas as well!
I wasn't expecting the bot voice and I immediately thought, "We are the Borg. Resistance is futile."
The only thing better than Alpha Zero's comments are Jerry's commentaries.
Your commentary is excellent and illuminating. Thank you.
I heard stockfish 9 will not get his bishop & queen trapped in the corner.
Love your videos Jerry... Clear, understandable and Informative... I watched some Alpha0 videos from other chess channels and they just lose me on the alternative moves... Pieces flying all over the place in quick succession and no lines like you do (my head spins)... I feel like playing Chess after watching your videos. They are the best on TH-cam and Twitch... Please do more Alpha0 so I don't get head spin 😁👍
Paused the video to mention "This clown on a6" lol!!
I saw how you tried to throw away the 'garbage' Bishop. Lol.
8:18 This is also how I draw my circles.
i wait for deepminds first lose. What will beat it, how long will it take and what will the game look like :D
Alpha zero played 1200 games against stockfish and lost a few of them, the games aren't published yet
in fact deepmind Alpha Zero lost some games to stockfish. there were 1000 games between them, you can find it on the paper they disponibilized and in some youtube videos covering that subject. :}
I tought there was only 100 games (28wins 72 draws). And 10 of them are published. Am i wrong?
Ádám Füsti they also did an opening analysis of 12 popular openings, 100 games each, 50 as black and 50 as white. A0 lost something like 4% of them.
Yea they published 100 games but they had many more played. I am assuming they do not want to publish them all because they want to analyze how the AI in each program is learning and adjusting to each other so they can sell that information. It is worth MILLIONS to programmers involved with advanced AI industries.
AlphaZero, stop bullying Stockfish it's not nice!
The outro is priceless
Thanks Jerry! Especially sassy commentary today, it was fun to listen to!
i look forward to these alphazero vids than anything else on youtube.
Eye-opening explanation of chess strategy. Many cordial thanks and Season's greetings from Cyberspace!
Great job, Jerry! Merry Christmas 🌲
I'm really enjoying this series - keep 'em coming - thanks :-)
Rip blacks light square bishop again!
He deserves a vacation after this. He's not needed anyways.
RIP lol
every single game, A0 traps stockfish's pieces, mostly the light sq bishop. such positional chess, much wow
Great video again Jerry. Love to hear you analyzing games, you're the best. They must renamed AlphaZero the "Bishops Killer", once again he was so good at neutralizing those :-)
Damn I learned something new in chess, so not only did the AI not kill the useless bishop but as if the ai knew it's technically dead and not really there as long as he block those pawns, the bishop just sat there waiting for his appointment all day till it was too late, Gg.
I'm madly in love this series please keep it up
Looking forward to the rest of the AlphaZero vs Stockfish 8 games!
Jerry keep analyzing the 10 games u are the best
Been enjoying these reviews of AlphaZero games.
+BoonceTV And I’ve been enjoying reviewing them. A win-win ! 😎
pls make more videos on super computer matches.... Its really instructive.... The way of looking at chess is changed after seeing the games of alpha zero.... Thank u so much for the videos.... Really improve my game
Τhank you very much ....your analysis makes chess. easy to understand ...greetings from GREECE...
AZ has been brutally targeting blacks light square bishop in these games. Typical weakness of alpha beta based engines (SF etc.) is being able to spot pieces that are trapped long term. It's the same type of weakness that makes them bad at properly evaluating fortress positions.
Ah the old 7 rooks on the rocks a classic.
Thanks Jerry! Great explanation.
6:36 "This clown on a6." Best formulation.
A continuing pattern with these games is eliminating the bishop from playing essentially going up a full piece and executing accurately.
I look forward to your analysis of AlphaZero games. love the cyborg commentary.
Fascinating commentary, very educating, thanks a lot. New sub!
+Musettelover 👍🏼
I would be curious to hear you thoughts on the stockfish suggestions shown on the right. Sometimes they differ from what stockfish in the game does but also the moves are not discussed by you as bad moves. E.G. at 11:30 it suggest Ra3, with a depth of 27.
It seems every time Stockfish plays e6 against AlphaZero, that light square bishop is garbage the rest of the game.
Stockfish always get stuck pieces it seems. For some reason. I guess it has to do with how Stockfish evaluates positions.
At 8:25 (black to move) what's wrong with pawn f5 forking the knight and queen? White could capture on f6 with either the pawn (en passant) or the knight (checking the king). Either way after the exchanges the queen and the rook (black) would form a nice battery on an uncontested half-open f file.
I wonder if self-learning AI could turn into a problem for chess, in that it'd be more difficult to catch cheaters; if new, better AI make more human-like moves and decisions, it may be more difficult to catch what would previously be obvious engine moves.
You make a good point. It will be more difficult for human players to detect the kind of style indicative of cheating at first glance; however, cheaters on chess websites such as lichess are caught using statistical analysis. Admins look at how often the computer agrees with their moves and simply applies t-tests to reveal cheaters.
The kind of machinery used by google's deep mind is too specialized and powerful to be commercially available in the foreseeable future, so it is unlikely that we'll see cheaters using alphazero specifically. But I am excited to see the improvements the stockfish community makes to their engine, even if they continue to use search algorithms and opening books instead of deep neural nets.
Exciting times in the world of chess engines.
that crossed my mind too
Indeed, I hope a standard Chess engine prevails over this A0 soon. Even though my guess is that A0-style of AI is superior to the standard Stockfish one in the long run. I hope that a a standard stockfish can beat A0 soon.
Me being me Aren't you just punishing people for good chess, in that case? It basically would become impossible for a real upset to occur in chess, because they must have cheated- and that would take a lot of the fun out of things.
I never liked chess engines to be honest, ugly chess , I do however like A0's chess there is artistry apparent there
The "bad bishop" is a well known concept that doesn't require a computer to exploit. Many human players have played sacrifices like the one AZ played but not with this level of technique.
What a cage that was that black was forced into making for his own bishop ! Dude got locked down *tight* !
11:30 what if instead of Qd8 we have Ra3 (not a2, a3) threatening to take that bishop. If the bishop moves to say b2 Rb3 or even c3. If bishop to e4 the rook can take that bishop (on c3) and if the queen is taken the rook falls with check and the bishop is picked up afterwards with a dangerous past pawn. (winning a net piece) If after Re3 something like Be1 (now Be4 is a legitimate threat) Qb3 seems like a good idea with a future of moves like Qb2 and c3. It's a lot more active play from black to be sure.
I have a question related to 8:10 of the video why black didn't play the pawn on F7 to F5
Quick question at 11:02
Why wouldn't white just push Bishop to h7?
Bishop h7, Black King takes, White Queen takes f7, if the rook comes out to defend the black-tile bishop, then either queen could take the pawn or the rook could push to the a-file and work from there... I assume there's a reason but can someone point it out?
Love these AlphaZero vids!!
Could you make a video showing the differences between the moves predicted for deepmind by stockfish and the actual move played by deepmind?
At 8:20, why isn't pawn on f7 moved to f5?
I don't deserve so many great analises, thanks Jerry.
Why can't black play F5 forking the bishop and the queen at 13:09 or even better at 13:45? 🤔
At 14:05 would anyone else consider the exchange sacrifice on Rd5? Just curious...
I love ur vids jerryyyyy!!!!!!!! Love them all! XD btw Alpha is gonna destroy us xD
Move 53 (22:08 in the video), why isn't Pawn to f5 the better move?
At 8:41 the commentator suggests Qc7 as an option for black, but it seems to me that white will punish that with Nxe6! After fxe6 Qxe6+ follows, and then the white queen takes the bishop on e7, thus winning a pawn
Cant to see alpha vs alpha would be an insane game
My plan as black at move 14 (7:23) would have been Qc7, Nd7, at some point long castles, and maybe actually c5. No danger on the kingside anymore, all targets are gone
At 8:30, Why doesn't black play f5, winning the knight and opening up the rook file? Is there a defence against this I am not seeing?
Excellent video. It seems that Stockfish undervalues space on the board in its evaluation.
This is my favorite series, love the endings
wow, alpha-zero is a pro at freezing bishops behind their own pawns. what an interesting way to gain an advantage
One of the Best games i have seen. An well Explained..
Brilliance comes in pairs, Jerry. Which means Alpha Zero must be your brother from another mother!
Ps. Any puzzle videos in the works?
At 8:50 is it possible to completely ignore the attack on the bishop and play Nb6. You'll be giving away the bishop for free, but it's already a dead piece. Obviously this isn't good, but as a practical try it doesn't seem bad.
I dunno why, but i was first scared at how good Alpha0 is at chess and at go, something like this with its ways of playing, to me is very intimidating just thinking of playing against, how can you best something that is already 12 moves ahead of your current move variation. But now i realize that this is an opportunity to learn from something as smart as it! Analysing, discussing and dissecting its movements, has enabled viewers to be able to learn to improve their games.
Great one Jerry, although black should have immediately given the c pawn back to give his lightsquare bishop some view
at 15:46 why doesn't white sack rook on the h7 pawn how is that not the best move
i mean 15:20
Why do you cut out stockfish's response out of all these videos? I don't understand...