Jerko Majetić That’s not true at all, because alpha sees positions completely different. What may be objectively losing may actually be winning for alpha because it is so much stronger than stock fish, so even though stock fish may think it’s winning like it does in many games, it slowly realizes it’s actually losing because alpha makes moves far above the level of stock fish.
@@iwfusion2154 engines analyse positions and play the best possible move, and while i agree that alpha could come back from maybe a piece or few pawn odds, there is no coming back from a rook or queen odds, stock would force trades and in an endgame with a few pawns advantage, all computing power in the world cant win a losing endgame position to a system that doesnt make mistakes
Jerko Majetić You are assuming that stock fish makes no mistakes, which is not true. It’s run itself into zugzwangs, had multiple pieces not able to develop, and many other things that we don’t see as mistakes but actually are. Stock fish plays the best move it can make, but alphas skill is so much higher that moves that may be perfect to stock fish may actually be blunders or even not seeing a win that alpha has been calculating for many moves. So while it won’t technically many any mistakes to a human, alpha may see such moves as mistakes.
Yeah but how do we know a position is losing? By analyzing it with an engine? We've seen many examples now where A0 does things no one expected that we would have thought were mistakes, like sacking multiple pawns, moving the queen multiple times in the opening etc. What I would like to see is what would happen if we flipped SF and A0 at maybe move 10 in a few games. Then if SF is able to win in that position, we'd be able to conclude that A0 had an objective advantage early on. If SF is unable still to beat A0, then we'll know that A0 is ludicrously more powerful than SF.
Is amazing that humans tries to sacrifice a piece for a attack on the king, but Alpha sacrifice a piece to immobilize opponent's major pieces. I saw stockfish, many times with a useless rook or bishop(knight) or both.
I agree, alpha doesn't play the game to win pieces, he plays to control the board until no moves remain and the opponent is forced into making repeated mistakes
Yes, and I've noticed a pattern to many of its games. It tends to make a checkers-like pattern. In a way it's more beautiful to watch these games than to watch the old games of the romantic era. Alpha slowly but surely secures and dominates the board. It really is magnificent to witness.
@@jccusell When it doesn't slowly squeeze and dominate, it gives up material for activity, which is more in the style of the Romantic era than the former style.
I would like to ask if you could do Karpov first. I would really like to understand how chess evolved after Fischer left. The beginning of the Karpov story is really part of the end of the Fischer story.
@@07aniketdeysarkar26 im a md and i see no computer programs doing my job better than i do. chess gms are as useless as truck drivers. machines do their job better than they do and if this fact hurts your pride and makes you say rude things about people you dont know, that shows your quality mate. carry on, ill not stoop to your level.
such a simple and learnable concept from A0. 1) stick a fawn (thorn) Pawn. 2) preserve the Bishop of the color of the square of the blockading Pawn. 3) exchange the other pieces to keep the fawn Pawn safe. 4) attack the blockading Pawn with the Bishop to keep the enemy King tied down to the defense. 5) unleash your King on the other side of the board. 6) PROFIT!
@Jay Paul yeah for sure. i mean, i'm used to seeing forced late game zugzwangs, but to achieve this level of pressure in the midgame is mind-boggling. black had lots of pieces and no options.
@Jay Paul That's why I would like to see the last of the A0-A0 training games. What it looks like to me, is that A0 has a fantastic understanding of development and initiative, that stockfish clearly lacks, Which is why every decisive game I've seen thus far involved stockfish getting tied up into knots. I would suspect thats also why A0 fares so much better with white than appears to be usual.
The only thing @agadmator did not mention is at 7:37 if black plays Qxd6. The queen seems undefended, but then white simply checkmates with Bf6, making this not possible. It confused me for a bit why Stockfish did not simply play this, but then I figured that out.
for me, the most important issue was, to doubling the D-pawn in the opening. No human mind will be able to create such a strange idea ... and winning the game later on. Great and scary at the same moment. And again, well done, Antonio, your style is great too.
th-cam.com/video/7JgR4iPeyxQ/w-d-xo.html Video by Suren (Hello chess lovers!) Stockfish 8 vs. AlphaZero French Defense (Classical Variation) Result: AlphaZero resigned after Move 22.
It's so strange how AlphaZero also tries to trap Stockfish, e.g. at 5:50, whereas other engines would not try that as they assume that their opponent will play the strongest moves.
Although played by two machines, those games are in some way beautiful and charming, Iappreciate this very much, that Agadmator is showing us those brilliancies.
I have an idea about how alpha zero might "think". Maybe this is common for better chess players but I just realized because it is very different from how I view the chess pieces on the board. I found the white pawn on the h file very peculiar. It created a lot of pressure on the black king, because it covers the g7 spot, ready to be exploited by white. I think alpha zero doesn't look at the pieces themselves, but more on the fields they cover with their attacks. I feel that I personally look more at my own pieces and whether they are vulnerable instead. Imagine you'd blend out your pieces and instead only saw which fields they are covering at any given moment, maybe you would see what alpha zero "sees".
Niklas... Hello...Very good analysis... I am 60 now, but when I played chess in my twenties, I would look at the board and pieces in the exact same way you describe in your post. The calculations and analysis is intense for humans. However, for a machine (naturally) no emotion enters the calculations and moves!!! I always played fine chess, but, now at an advaced age one's concentration and stamina decreases immensely. Keep watching and, I do hope you ejoy all of the games presented on this channel.
The thing is when we play chess we cannot just focus on creating something beautiful. Like you mentioned, we have to check which of our pieces is vulnerable and whether we are blundering something. However, sometimes playing beautiful, creative, attacking chess is the way to go. You don't give a thought about weaknesses in the position, king safety, etc while you go straight for the enemy king. One example is Kasparov's legendary game vs Karpov in the world championship. Kasparov later explained that all he needed was 4 pieces in the game to checkmate his opponent's king. He used all his other pieces to break open the position and make his way in. He also played these sacrifices without thinking for long, based more on his "intuition", similar to the way Alpha Zero played. The only advantage AZ has is that it is a computer and it knows all its vulnerabilities along with seeing the plan and it plays without any emotions of fear.
It is interesting to note that A0 indirectly plays the English Opening but avoids the King's English lines. This is because Black has aggressive counter-play in the center with 1. c4 e5. A0 first prevents Black from pushing e5 with Nf3 then returns to the English with 2. c4. By pitting Stockfish 10 against itself, Stockfish 10 evaluates King's English lines as around 0.0 or -0.1 a few moves in. This means that with 1. c4 e5, Black can equalize in the English. A0 deftly sidesteps the issue by playing Nf3 first. If Black plays 1. Nf3 d5, A0 can simply reply with 2. d4. Then the game will often transpose into Queen's Gambit Declined, which A0 also favors.
In the analysis you provide after 27. Re4 and then 28. Bd7, you give 29.Re6 fxe6 30. Bxe6+ Kh8 31. Qxd6 looking for Qe5 mate if the Black Queen moves, but there is also the beautiful 31. ....Qxd6 32.Bf6 mate!!! if the Black Queen accepts the sacrifice of the White Queen. 31. ..Qf7 32. Bxf7 leads to mate as well. (I may have the move numbers wrong trying to follow your spoken analysis - sorry!)
holy smoke, hypnotized stockfish just dancing with rook a8-b8 and back... Alpha has some psychic powers (as many point out, probably a new era in chess started - the main goal will be to immobilize the opponent)
"we used Stockfish version 8 (official Linux release) as a baseline program. Stockfish was configured according to its 2016 TCEC world championship superfinal settings: 44 threads on 44 cores (two 2.2GHz Intel Xeon Broadwell CPUs with 22 cores), a hash size of 32GB, syzygy endgame tablebases, at 3 hour time controls with 15 additional seconds per move. We also evaluated against the most recent version, Stockfish 9 (just released at time of writing), using the same configuration." - This should put some DeepMind skeptics to rest.
I am willing to answer any questions you have. All evidence suggests that Stockfish 10 (Which is +112 Elo to SF8) is stronger than AlphaZero as AZ's performance against SF8 was only +52 Elo. That makes SF10 +60 Elo stronger than AlphaZero.
Hi i just want to know if they tested alphazero to chess puzzles like thebone made by philidor some 400.yrs ago..my stockfish on my phone cant solve it..i wonder if it can solve such puzzle..
#agadmator Can you please explain why at 9:14 black is losing? If white pushes pawn g4 cant the black go for example rook b8 and if white pushes pawn g5 go with the knight at h5 and if white tries to attack the knight with the bishop go queen f8? I mean is a bad potision for black but cant he hold out? Or am i just seeing things? (new to chess)
7:33 I don’t get it. The pawn could take the Q or Q takes Q. I’ve played maybe 5-10 games in my life so I could be missing something... I’m a total beginner and don’t have the capacity to look ahead and then backtrack and keep the commentary fluid in my mind. 🍻
#suggestion Anthony Saidy vs Robert James Fisher US championship 1964 "the 11th hour" - English opening. Fisher wins with knight against a bishop in the endgame
Stockfish 10 just came out. Free download. I playes around 50 games vs stockfish 9 at 1 min and SF10 was getting around 95elo extra. But over many games in testing I think it is meant to be around 55 elo stronger.
Hi Agad .....I dig out the meaning of Zero in alphazero......it means Zero human knowledge and learns from experience and has no specific rules encoded .
![โอ้เธอช่าง... - บี้เดอะสกา ft. ต๋อง เทวัญ (Prod. by ป๋าเพชร) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zbWhiLFmVL0/mqdefault.jpg)
the developers should make alpha play from losing positions so he can make crazy combacks
Stockfish cant lose a winning position
Jerko Majetić That’s not true at all, because alpha sees positions completely different. What may be objectively losing may actually be winning for alpha because it is so much stronger than stock fish, so even though stock fish may think it’s winning like it does in many games, it slowly realizes it’s actually losing because alpha makes moves far above the level of stock fish.
@@iwfusion2154 engines analyse positions and play the best possible move, and while i agree that alpha could come back from maybe a piece or few pawn odds, there is no coming back from a rook or queen odds, stock would force trades and in an endgame with a few pawns advantage, all computing power in the world cant win a losing endgame position to a system that doesnt make mistakes
Jerko Majetić You are assuming that stock fish makes no mistakes, which is not true. It’s run itself into zugzwangs, had multiple pieces not able to develop, and many other things that we don’t see as mistakes but actually are. Stock fish plays the best move it can make, but alphas skill is so much higher that moves that may be perfect to stock fish may actually be blunders or even not seeing a win that alpha has been calculating for many moves. So while it won’t technically many any mistakes to a human, alpha may see such moves as mistakes.
Yeah but how do we know a position is losing? By analyzing it with an engine? We've seen many examples now where A0 does things no one expected that we would have thought were mistakes, like sacking multiple pawns, moving the queen multiple times in the opening etc. What I would like to see is what would happen if we flipped SF and A0 at maybe move 10 in a few games. Then if SF is able to win in that position, we'd be able to conclude that A0 had an objective advantage early on. If SF is unable still to beat A0, then we'll know that A0 is ludicrously more powerful than SF.
mr. stockfish, i don't feel so good
Computers are stupid. The black rook hops back and forth, back and forth....sheesh.
@@emsnewssupkis6453 I would assume that you're making a joke here :)
Is that from avengers....
th-cam.com/video/uXOUX4A5G5o/w-d-xo.html
@@emsnewssupkis6453haha play stockfish, see how stupid it is…
Man i can't wait to move my h pawn 3 times in a row now.
"Har-ry! Har-ry!! Har-ry!!!" -- GingerGM
@@davidanderson_surrey_bc wasn't Harry the Bishop? What's this a reference to?
@@juannarvaez5476 Harry the H pawn. Gary the G pawn. 'Arry the A pawn
Is amazing that humans tries to sacrifice a piece for a attack on the king, but Alpha sacrifice a piece to immobilize opponent's major pieces. I saw stockfish, many times with a useless rook or bishop(knight) or both.
Humans do that too.
aseris sok not well
I agree, alpha doesn't play the game to win pieces, he plays to control the board until no moves remain and the opponent is forced into making repeated mistakes
❤Precisely. Well said and well OBSERVED.
A large theme running through Alpha's games is how it continuously prevents it's opponents from making any meaningful moves. amazing to watch
Yes, and I've noticed a pattern to many of its games. It tends to make a checkers-like pattern. In a way it's more beautiful to watch these games than to watch the old games of the romantic era. Alpha slowly but surely secures and dominates the board. It really is magnificent to witness.
@@mikeisapro Agreed
@@jccusell When it doesn't slowly squeeze and dominate, it gives up material for activity, which is more in the style of the Romantic era than the former style.
yes its aggression is amazing. no room for error or more aggression and no better alternative for the opponent
Absolutely.
As expected! Agadmator survived The Snap...
Deepmind looked at 14 000 605 possible combinations. he wins in all of them
*14000605
How did you even know
@@electricman8545 it's a reference
@@surv5k I c
@@electricman8545 its from Dr Strange
I would like to ask if you could do Karpov first. I would really like to understand how chess evolved after Fischer left. The beginning of the Karpov story is really part of the end of the Fischer story.
karpov is a noob compared to alpha
@@stopstalkingyouspookybastard you are noob compared to masters
@@stopstalkingyouspookybastard true...but how do you compare humans to 21st century AI in chess strength?
@@stopstalkingyouspookybastard
Your intelligence is noob as compared to even the average human intelligence.
Shame on you.
@@07aniketdeysarkar26 im a md and i see no computer programs doing my job better than i do. chess gms are as useless as truck drivers. machines do their job better than they do and if this fact hurts your pride and makes you say rude things about people you dont know, that shows your quality mate. carry on, ill not stoop to your level.
I know this is over a year old but have been binging on Alphazero content and really appreciate how you analyze these games
such a simple and learnable concept from A0.
1) stick a fawn (thorn) Pawn.
2) preserve the Bishop of the color of the square of the blockading Pawn.
3) exchange the other pieces to keep the fawn Pawn safe.
4) attack the blockading Pawn with the Bishop to keep the enemy King tied down to the defense.
5) unleash your King on the other side of the board.
6) PROFIT!
I find it painfully ironic that Antonio is using Stockfish to analyse its own crushing defeat xD
There is actually stockfish 10 out now.
Antonio is a sadist lmao
alpha is insane. it just completely debilitates black mid-game in every game it wins
@Jay Paul yeah for sure. i mean, i'm used to seeing forced late game zugzwangs, but to achieve this level of pressure in the midgame is mind-boggling. black had lots of pieces and no options.
@Jay Paul That's why I would like to see the last of the A0-A0 training games. What it looks like to me, is that A0 has a fantastic understanding of development and initiative, that stockfish clearly lacks, Which is why every decisive game I've seen thus far involved stockfish getting tied up into knots. I would suspect thats also why A0 fares so much better with white than appears to be usual.
How to win against stockfish:
1. Let Harry zoom up the board
2. Profit
Every time Agad says, 'this position has never been reached before'.. I am like.. you kidding me, I reached this position yesterday and lost.
It plays with such a simplicity and fluidity. Makes everything look so easy!
The FAWN PAWN has been installed once more.
Actually.
The only thing @agadmator did not mention is at 7:37 if black plays Qxd6. The queen seems undefended, but then white simply checkmates with Bf6, making this not possible. It confused me for a bit why Stockfish did not simply play this, but then I figured that out.
I’ve watched all the alpha zero games you’ve uploaded, some several times! The h pawn here was my favorite so far. That was so cool
I can watch these alpha zero videos over and over
*The only thig I question here*
is why stockfish let the H pawn march like that to the Black King's face
for me, the most important issue was, to doubling the D-pawn in the opening. No human mind will be able to create such a strange idea ... and winning the game later on. Great and scary at the same moment. And again, well done, Antonio, your style is great too.
What are you always fixing under the table in the beginning of every video?)))
I believe it's adjusting volume from speakers or something. Don't really hear much difference though...
Maybe he's under house arrest and is simply adjusting his ankle monitor?
And what was his crime you ask? Being too good for TH-cam of course!
Probably a subwoofer. If it's anything like mine, it sounds like the gestapo marching through the house when I move chess pieces.
I always thought he was just scratching his leg. 😂
His lipstick tube, with a chess supercomputer, falls out from time to time.
Stockfish: I used to be a contender.
Alpha Zero: I'll get your jacket.
Alpha Zero's main skill is moving Stockfish's pieces to useless places.
I would love to see the vast knowledge aquired from AlphaZero playing Dwarf Fortress.
it is terrifying.
I love AlphaZero's playing style. Just smothering it's opponents with virtual pillows.
"There is a clear path here"
Stockfish: WHEN DID YOU MAKE THAT PATH?
Could you show next time a game stockfish actually won
th-cam.com/video/7JgR4iPeyxQ/w-d-xo.html
Video by Suren (Hello chess lovers!)
Stockfish 8 vs. AlphaZero
French Defense (Classical Variation)
Result: AlphaZero resigned after Move 22.
It's so strange how AlphaZero also tries to trap Stockfish, e.g. at 5:50, whereas other engines would not try that as they assume that their opponent will play the strongest moves.
Although played by two machines, those games are in some way beautiful and charming, Iappreciate this very much, that Agadmator is showing us those brilliancies.
#suggestion what about engines photo challenges, to improve our vast knowledge, even about non human players ?
"And here we have a nice photo challenge from the AlphaZero-Stockfish8 Match of 2018. See if you can identify the printed circuit on the left."
@@davidanderson_surrey_bc yep, that would be quite hard but he could also show us some logo of engines
Definitely!
Antonio is the reason....Magnus will be dethroned in year 2027...
How??
@@mtemikibasa1072 I will dethrone him
@@himanshusharma-lt3zg all the best mate
@@mtemikibasa1072 thank you bro....
Unless you're 4 years old you can forget about it
It's too late
I have an idea about how alpha zero might "think".
Maybe this is common for better chess players but I just realized because it is very different from how I view the chess pieces on the board.
I found the white pawn on the h file very peculiar. It created a lot of pressure on the black king, because it covers the g7 spot, ready to be exploited by white.
I think alpha zero doesn't look at the pieces themselves, but more on the fields they cover with their attacks.
I feel that I personally look more at my own pieces and whether they are vulnerable instead. Imagine you'd blend out your pieces and instead only saw which fields they are covering at any given moment, maybe you would see what alpha zero "sees".
Niklas...
Hello...Very good analysis...
I am 60 now, but when I played chess in my twenties, I would look at the board and pieces in the exact same way you describe in your post. The calculations and analysis is intense for humans. However, for a machine (naturally) no emotion enters the calculations and moves!!!
I always played fine chess, but, now at an advaced age one's concentration and stamina decreases immensely. Keep watching and, I do hope you ejoy all of the games presented on this channel.
The thing is when we play chess we cannot just focus on creating something beautiful. Like you mentioned, we have to check which of our pieces is vulnerable and whether we are blundering something. However, sometimes playing beautiful, creative, attacking chess is the way to go. You don't give a thought about weaknesses in the position, king safety, etc while you go straight for the enemy king. One example is Kasparov's legendary game vs Karpov in the world championship. Kasparov later explained that all he needed was 4 pieces in the game to checkmate his opponent's king. He used all his other pieces to break open the position and make his way in. He also played these sacrifices without thinking for long, based more on his "intuition", similar to the way Alpha Zero played. The only advantage AZ has is that it is a computer and it knows all its vulnerabilities along with seeing the plan and it plays without any emotions of fear.
Avengers Endgame 😱😱😱😱
Haha I was looking for this one
1:07 you mean sorry about that
Whoah! I would've never thought of that very clear path in the opp color bishop ending
That h-pawn walk was a bit creepy. As if AlphaZero was determined to get it over there with little regard it's opponent's subsequent moves
Correct me if im wrong, cant you just at 9:12 take the Knight that is blocking and put it on E8? It would defend G7 or am i wrong?
It is interesting to note that A0 indirectly plays the English Opening but avoids the King's English lines. This is because Black has aggressive counter-play in the center with 1. c4 e5. A0 first prevents Black from pushing e5 with Nf3 then returns to the English with 2. c4.
By pitting Stockfish 10 against itself, Stockfish 10 evaluates King's English lines as around 0.0 or -0.1 a few moves in. This means that with 1. c4 e5, Black can equalize in the English. A0 deftly sidesteps the issue by playing Nf3 first.
If Black plays 1. Nf3 d5, A0 can simply reply with 2. d4. Then the game will often transpose into Queen's Gambit Declined, which A0 also favors.
Alfazero making possibilities more more interesting in the chess give us new lessons
Beautiful lesson, just beautiful.
In the analysis you provide after 27. Re4 and then 28. Bd7, you give 29.Re6 fxe6 30. Bxe6+ Kh8 31. Qxd6 looking for Qe5 mate if the Black Queen moves, but there is also the beautiful 31. ....Qxd6 32.Bf6 mate!!! if the Black Queen accepts the sacrifice of the White Queen. 31. ..Qf7 32. Bxf7 leads to mate as well. (I may have the move numbers wrong trying to follow your spoken analysis - sorry!)
If you check some of king crusherd videos, Leela sticks in that thorn pawn. Alpha uses the same idea.. Just magnificent.
“Alpha Zero, I don’t feel so good.” -Stockfish 8
"We're in the endgame now" - Dr Strange
Best strategy: send your queen into the range of an enemy pawn.
Love your channel! Great videos
At 8:04 losing the bishop was the least of Stockfish's problems, there was back rank cm available
I miss in the first part of the some nice pictures of the players.
7:32 Why could the black queen not have simply captured the white queen? I am confused.
Bf6#
holy smoke, hypnotized stockfish just dancing with rook a8-b8 and back... Alpha has some psychic powers
(as many point out, probably a new era in chess started - the main goal will be to immobilize the opponent)
At 4:02, checkmate could be stopped by black queen sacrifice right? I mean, after taking bishop on e5.
Those sneaky idea is very Karpovian move.
Everytime an alphazero game is shown I am forced to just enjoy the show.
Get well soon!
*It was in this position that stockfish resigned the game*
Damn so satisfying.
Hello, I would be very interested in seeing an alpha zero vs alpha zero game. Love your commentary and channel, keep it up!
"we used Stockfish version 8 (official Linux release) as a
baseline program. Stockfish was configured according to its 2016 TCEC world championship
superfinal settings: 44 threads on 44 cores (two 2.2GHz Intel Xeon Broadwell CPUs with 22
cores), a hash size of 32GB, syzygy endgame tablebases, at 3 hour time controls with 15 additional
seconds per move. We also evaluated against the most recent version, Stockfish 9 (just
released at time of writing), using the same configuration." - This should put some DeepMind skeptics to rest.
I am willing to answer any questions you have.
All evidence suggests that Stockfish 10 (Which is +112 Elo to SF8) is stronger than AlphaZero as AZ's performance against SF8 was only +52 Elo. That makes SF10 +60 Elo stronger than AlphaZero.
Stockfish was left surprised how all this happened.
I think they need to add a “don’t allow your opponent’s pawn to h6” clause to Stockfish’s programming.
What I observed from these Alpha games is that Alpha loves his bishop pairs
Hi i just want to know if they tested alphazero to chess puzzles like thebone made by philidor some 400.yrs ago..my stockfish on my phone cant solve it..i wonder if it can solve such puzzle..
4:06 what the hell man?? Bishop e5?! What happens then? Looks like white must retreat.
Get better, Agad! We need you to make our Saturday even better :-)
#agadmator Can you please explain why at 9:14 black is losing? If white pushes pawn g4 cant the black go for example rook b8 and if white pushes pawn g5 go with the knight at h5 and if white tries to attack the knight with the bishop go queen f8? I mean is a bad potision for black but cant he hold out? Or am i just seeing things? (new to chess)
Your videos have best titles on TH-cam 😂
You had the flu exactly one year ago, same date.... showing the Immortal Zugzwang by Alpha. :(
Congratulations.... you are a great finder of sneaky ideas......
At 7:25, what about Nb4? I didn't play it out, but it "defends" by attacking the White queen.
Dag, that was a wonderful game!
"Part of the journey is the End"
At 11:30, couldn't promption be stopped with Kd5? After c8=Q it allows Ke7+ with a fork.
Wait, just realized that's prevented with c8=K
7:33 I don’t get it. The pawn could take the Q or Q takes Q. I’ve played maybe 5-10 games in my life so I could be missing something... I’m a total beginner and don’t have the capacity to look ahead and then backtrack and keep the commentary fluid in my mind. 🍻
The pawn couldn't and if the Queen takes Queen then the bishops will checkmate blacks king
Nicolai Groves totally right... I’m learning slowly🍻🍻
Sick video!
Stock fish resigned the game.. Wow rare heard and so soothing to my ears..
10:41 instead of Rxe4 just move rook to e5 and this will allow black king to enter the game
#suggestion Anthony Saidy vs Robert James Fisher US championship 1964 "the 11th hour" - English opening. Fisher wins with knight against a bishop in the endgame
13:27 why can't the knight go to f6 square and fork the bishop and king?
Beautiful game... Alpha totally Owns Stockfish!
#suggestion John Nunn: white pieces
Andrei Sokolov: black pieces
1986 Dubai, Round 1
When the e pawn was doubled did Alpha Zero calculate queening that pawn to win the game?
Great Video btw. But why didn't Black just capture the unprotected queen with the queen at 7:37?
If stockfish captures the queen then alpha checkmates with blacksquare bishop
Ah the avengers trailer and a nice agadmator video
Is the stockfish 8 strongest stockfish?
Stockfish 10 just came out. Free download. I playes around 50 games vs stockfish 9 at 1 min and SF10 was getting around 95elo extra.
But over many games in testing I think it is meant to be around 55 elo stronger.
But outta all this, what all are the best moves that were recommended by the Engine ?
And the King reigns supreme....
Thank you!
How about some photos from this encounter? Let's have someone design a personification of both engines playing across a table.
i like theese A0 games a lot idk why. may bec i wanna see the genius+ moves?
Can someone explain to me this whole stockfish vs google deepmind game? Is it just 2 AIs going at eachother? Is the game still ongoing?
It is like watching Alpha Zero shoot fish in a barrel.
We love Alpha Zero's games
Pushing that H pawn early in the game seemed human-like
What I observe from Alpha is deactivate opponent queen first.
lol so many vids today love it!
13:22 Couldn't you let the bishop take the pawn and then play Knight f6 and fork the king and bishop?
Ok I take the pawn you take the bishop. Now how do you stop the pawn from promoting?
8:07 rook e8 with a forced mate.
No queen will protect on b3
Alpha zeros wins are crazy
I wonder whether you limited deep mind to just pawns whether a human could win
Hi Agad .....I dig out the meaning of Zero in alphazero......it means Zero human knowledge and learns from experience and has no specific rules encoded .
STAY HEALTHY!