Canon 24-70mm f/4 IS USM 'L' lens review with samples (Full-frame & APS-C)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ต.ค. 2024
- I've been holding off covering this particular lens, because before I even tested at it I thought it was overpriced, and I /hate/ overpriced equipment. But, I've had a lot of comments from people wanting me to cover it, so I caved in to the pressure and...well, you'll see what I thought of its quality.
Find it here (Amazon affiliate link):
geni.us/canone...
This video includes my new test chart, as I've moved to a new place far away from all my old shooting locations. I've tried to make it a colourful one.
Support me on Patreon! www.patreon.co...
My Canon 70D had to be sold as I was saving up for my wedding/ honeymoon, so I'm still using my old Canon 60D. It's kind of falling to pieces by now! All pictures and footage shot by me on Canon 6D and 60D cameras.
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonE...
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonE...
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma5...
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonR...
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/Marumi...
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020...
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSm...
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC...
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1...
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMin...
Music:
'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons....
I have this lens over year... My review:
Pros:
- very sharp even on f/4 with good contrast even when resisting sun (image quality is best thing on this lens for me)
- very effective IS (perfect for hand-shoot video)
- smooth zoom (mine is really smooth) and focusing
- build quality is superb
- macro is nice feature
- weather sealing
- universal focal length (best zoom lens for documentary, street and portrait photography - outdoor) with same aperture (good for video)
- USM with newer cameras is really quiet (not like in video with 60D)
Cons
- price (cashback was the reason why I bought it)
- heavy
- sharpness getting worse from f/8 (not very good for long exposures or landscape photography)
I was deciding between this and 24-105 but sharpness is really much better on 24-70 than 24-105. I would probably use more +45mm than macro feature but sharpness was crucial.
Jemi-To Shumafuk +35mm* ;)
Price is drop now it is a very affordable lens and the IQ is good for knows price.
Sharpness drop from f8 (f11 actually) is due to physics (diffraction), outside of anyone’s control. Happens to all wide angle lenses regardless of brand
That feel when Chris uploads a new video
Its a warm fuzzy feeling
+Pabla Digital ... Even the slight shoulder slump when you see it's not a review of the Sigma 50-150mm f1.8 can't totally spoil the pleasure. Next time, maybe next time. Hope springs eternal...
Good technical review. One thing though: on this and several other reviews comments were made about short focal range. The range actually is perfect for those who own either of the 70-200 mm L lenses. The macro mode also allows one to leave their 100 mm f2.8 L macro at home thus reducing the weight of one's kit. Cheers from Chicago!
I just received my 24-70mm F4L lens! Absolutely amazing!!!
Just curious, as I am seriously considering buying this lens this week....are you still enjoying it and does it still take over all great photos? Thanks..
ONE OF THE BEST -SADLY UNDERRATED- CHANNELS !!!!
The 2.8 II version is a wedding lens. For all other uses the f4 is much much better. On a 4k display the photos are about identical but the f4 has other advantages (size weight stability) that the 2.8 doesn’t. It’s my workhorse. Have had it for 8 years
In all cases the f4 is better. Bokeh f2.8 and f4 are the same at 70. For wedding use 85 1.2 and 35 1.4. Then you will see a difference in bokeh
I love the 24-70 range lenses. I used to own the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L (the original version). That lens was okay, I put it through hell and it never failed me. That said, it was SUPER bulky and heavy. I decided that I am less concerned about maximum aperture and more concerned about all day comfort and sharpness. I decided to sell my 24-70 2.8 and buy this lens...best decision I've made in a while. This lens is almost a pound lighter and much more compact than the original 2.8, and the sharpness is amazing on my copy. I would recommend the 24-70 f4.0 IS to anyone who wants a lightweight sharp lens from a proven company.
I agree... Sharpness on f/4 is really surprisingly good.
I have this lens and absolutely love it. I buyed this over the standard 24-105mm because of the macro mode.
i don't mean to correct anyone because I'm not a native english speaker as well. But Buyed really burned my eyes.
Sorry about your eyies
I had the 100mm f/2.8 L Macro and sold it to buy this lens. The 100mm is AMAZING, seriously amazing... I want one again still. But I could only afford one or the other. I like this lens because it has that zoom range but also gets you those macro shots when you want them. It's sharp and I don't have the same problem he mentioned in the video about the zoom ring being a little jerky.
I purchased this lens mainly for hikes and general shooting. I like doing landscapes and macro work, and this lens allows me to do both pretty nicely in one package.
Man this is a bad ass lens..I just purchased it
.after purchasing 10 other lens from
Sigma,tamron etc.that canon 24-105 is clean asf❤
Picked this one up recently for under £400.00 n excellent condition. Sharpest lense I have used. Sharper than the 35 mm 1.8 RF .. Sharper than the 16-35 F4 [EF]. I am not into Bokeh's, I normally use my 1.8 RF 35mm for night but generally my style is more about detail but with haze and light tones. I must say, the images of this lens till this very day remain in the top bracket. I never liked RF lense due to their crap build quality. Thye feel like a toy. EFS for me are heavy duty and in term of image quality it is just small margins really. Barring the AF on RFS interacts with the Cmera faster but hey, I am not a sports journalist.
Cashback on this lens is always big: 200 € in Germany. So it's like a 25% discount, which gives it a good price to performance ratio.
The macro mode is a feature I've always liked about this lens. But I have to say, that I more and more tend to use primes because I find the f/4 very limiting regarding party shots indoors and general low light photography. With a flash it's all right and let's be honest... you won't get a hell lot of out of focus background with a 35 f/2 either, when you can still zoom in to 70 mm with this zoom lens for a tighter headshot.
A nice lens.
My concern with both of these is the external zoom. Should I be worried about dust getting into this thing when it's zoomed out? Also it looks 'goofy' with that front barrel sticking out. I just like the way the 70 - 200 zooms internally, and also the image quality.
They're quite well weather-sealed so dust doesn't really get in on Canon's 'L' lenses (in my experience, anyway)
Hi Chris, I took your advice some time ago and picked up a nice black copy of the 24-85 for a meager £26 off ebay. It works well on my 5D Mk2, and I have no remorse at all. Similarly, the Tamron SP 70-300 Di VC USD you recommended, came to me for £165, also from ebay, and what an excellent job Tamron did there .
I also own a Vivitar series 1, 19-35 f3.5-4.5 for full frame, cost me £70. This lens can also be found badged under Tokina, Cosina and others, and has become my favourite landscape lens. It's a very cheep feeling, plastic thing, with a front element that spins, and no full time manual focus, but I couldn't care less hehe.
I also have a 20D and a 60D and have been using the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS HSM and the Canon 55-250 STM on them, and they are very impressive lenses too.
So I'd just like to say thanks for everything you do, your honesty and integrity when it comes to reviewing lenses is second to none.
Thanks! Really glad the information has helped you. Sounds like you have a great kit there :-)
I have this lens and prefer it over the twice as expensive 24-70 2.8 ii as that has no IS and the IS is great on this for handheld video! nice to not need the hassle of a steadycam or tripod or shoulder rig (juddery zoom sucks tho as u mentioned). I used it recently with my 1dx2 as it also makes a very short list of compatible lenses that can do a slow focus pull transition from the touch screen while shooting, most lenses with the 1dx2 are a set speed only and quite quick but this can be smooth n slow if u want. Interesting and strange it's soft up close in the middle but sharper if focused at a distance, hadn't noticed. The macro is nice except u often get so close with the lens that it shadows ur subject and leaves it with back lighting only hehe
Oh not only super slow focus transitions but extra fast ability over most lenses, which is best for continuous auto focus tracking during video
Agreed. I too passed up on the 2.8 II. In real life shooting the f4 is every bit as sharp at the 2.8, and I love the lightweight, compact size and IS.
Hi Chris.. Thanks for this review... I did appear to miss the limits of this lens concerning the effects of diffraction.. That information I find very handy as a landscape photographer.. Thanks Again!!
I am always excited to see your videos when you upload a new one. Would you give a comment or educated opinion on the Tokina 24-70 f2.8 ? I know you haven't reviewed it but perhaps you might have a comment on whether or not is a good option s a fast normal zoom lens now that DXO mark favored the sharpness ? thank you for all the information you share
Someone's made a review of it - I think that Lenstip have made a review of the new one
Excellent review as always. Keep up the good work. On the cost front, I suppose r&d costs do rise over time, but I can't understand why prices appear to rise QUITE so much.
best reviews on TH-cam. your videos get to the point . keep up the good work
Very well made review. I find the macro mode a bit...odd, but useful at the same time.
I would love to have an image quality comparison tool with your resolution chart photos.
Holding such a cool lens in your hands, but never catching up ... Master - fu
My only regret so far with this lens is that I didn't buy it before my last holiday. It's that good compared to all the old second hand gear I've been using. It also works remarkably well with an original EOS650. It is *big* however. Bigger than the 28-80mm USM it replaces, or the 50mm F1.4 that normally lives in my bag. Balances well on the old beast, mind. Tested it on a 100D for sheds and giggles and it was out-resolving the sensor
It could read the text on a license plate from 100 metres away in 50mm, which the kit lens with the 100D just rendered as a white.
Chris if you were going to buy a lens today which would you buy, the 24/70 f4 or the 24/105 f4 ???
Hi Chris Thanks for the review. Which one do you recommend this one or the24-105 mk2? Which do you think is sharper.
The 24-70 is just a touch sharper with less distortion. Take a look at my reviews for more info
Christopher Frost Photography I already watched your review for 24-105 version one. But I want to know about version two 24-105... Thanks.
I haven't tested that yet
Christopher Frost Photography OK Thanks await your review with comparison to 24-70 f2.8 2...
Great video but can I ask what camera you were using?
Just sold my old 24-105 f/4 L, the one that came out in 10/2005 and now I'm looking for a replacement and I'm considering the 24-70 f/4L IS and the new 24-105 f/4L IS II, hope this video makes that decision easier!
So what lens did you buy ?
Is it good ?
A major difference between this lens and the 24-105 L is their t-stop values. The 24-70 lets in nearly a full stop more light at the same aperture!
That's if you trust DXO Mark hehe. I wish I'd done my own tests, to look into it.
Oh, I wasn't just trusting them ;-) I ran my own comparison. Using full manual exposure, I metered a subject properly with my 24-70 and took a shot. Then, without changing any settings, put my 24-105 on the camera
and it metered 1 stop underexposed. Photos definitely show the difference, as the ones with 24-105 are considerably darker than the ones with 24-70. I also reversed that by metering properly with the 24-105. When I put the 24-70 on, it metered 1 stop overexposed.
That's very interesting - I'm surprised to hear it! Like I said, I wish I'd looked at it myself at the time.
@daniel Thank you for your comment, that's very interesting. If you had to choose again between the 24-70 f4 IS Macro and the new 24-105 f4 IS version II, which one would you pick?
Laurent L I thought about that very seriously! I do not have first hand experience with the mark II version of the 24-105, but according to DXOMARK, it has lost peak sharpness and still doesn't let in as much light as the 24-70 (approx. 1/2 stop less). In the end, I sold my 24-105, and don't plan on getting the mark II.
This is my future lens for my sigma fp
I'd recommend the EF-S 15-85mm for APS-C. It is roughly equivalent to the 28-105mm in zoom range but was built specifically to suit an APS-C sensor and it's optically equal to an L lens but Canon don't give the L label to EF-S or EF-M lenses. It's not cheap but worth it.
The 15-85 is actually even better than that - it's the equivalent of 24-136mm
Very good review as always. The macro feature is a bit odd, especially as it isn't that sharp until f/8. I know wider apertures on macro isn't always that useful, but I would have been good to be sharper though at the wider apertures. These are popular macro lenses, so could you possibly review the older Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro and or the newer version, the Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM? Maybe how they compare to the Canon 100mm L Macro lens.
Very nice review!
Personally I think that someone looking at this lens should just buy a Tamron 24-70 2.8. Sharper, lower maximum aperture, same price!
What another exceptionally well put video from you Chris.
I see absolutely nothing negative towards your review of this lens.
You explained your review from an utmost professional point of use, as per usual. I, like many others continue to learn constructive information always when watching your videos.
I might add, without blowing your trumpet even further, that I have purchased two lens thanks to your videos. ( canon 24-105mm L and the canon nifty fifty 1.8 ).
I have been happy with my images becuase I learned to listen and learn.
My next dillema is to trade in my old sigma 70-200mm f2.8 non imagw stabilised lens for something lighter and with an IS !
Any suggestions..?
Keep up the the excellent work, you are blessed.
Thanks! Glad I could help. Tamron are rumored to be working on an image stabilized 70-200 f/4 lens at the moment, so it might be worth holding on for that. Otherwise it's the Canon 70-200 f/4 IS USM - which is a little expensive.
Christopher Frost Photography thanks as always for your swift response!
Another f/4 tele may be not as bright for concert shoots, so perhaps that Tamron might just be up my street!
I already have the 24-105L f/4 thanks to your review !
Have a blessed day.
Thank you so much! This was abundantly helpful!!!
Just bought this lens for my Canon 6D mkii, i got the lens for €375!
Hi, does this lens have IS ?
Chris, so you would better prefer EF-S 18-155 for wide angle on crop than this one?
Was considering going with this lens over the Tamron 24-70 VC, but I caved and bought the Tamron last night. I feel I made the right choice for my needs, but man I could have used this video yesterday! :P
You didn’t mention the focus shift. Would have been nice to watch a good explanation of this problem not only reading stuff elsewhere I don’t quite understand....
Chris, you should try out some Voigtlanders whenever you have the chance.
I wouldn't mind actually. Perhaps sometime soon
That would be lovely. Looking forward to it!
Does the 24-85mm lens you mention compare to the 24-70mm?
It compares surprisingly well
It would be nice to see a comprehensive comparison with the 24-105. I was going to buy this lens, but my only concerns are the not super smooth zoom ring and the autofocus noise in video mode. Are those two better or worse on the 24-105?
I can't remember off the top of my head but I cover all those questions in my reviews - take a look
Excellent review Chris. God Bless..
Lol, £550 for an L lens isn’t expensive. The 2.8 II version costs almost £2k, which doesn’t have a macro zoom or IS.
Hi Chris, I'm looking for a general walk around lens but keeping the price tag reasonably low. I'm shooting on a Canon 80D. What lens would you buy between this, the 24-105 f/4, or the old 24-70 f/2.8 mk1?
I'm oriented on the one in this video because of sharpness and minor vignetting and distortion compared to the 24-105 f/4, and because of the IS compared to the old 24-70 f/2.8.
Plus, the price is not to high on this, and has a pretty good macro function.
Just wanted to hear your opinion.
Thank you in advance.
Alessandro Magnani which lens did u buy
don't forget to record and upload your beautiful wedding/honeymoon footage to us! :D
I plan buy 90d, its handle hires 32pxl ?
Thanks for the review Chris. I just bought this lens for the 5dIV and paid only 400 pounds for a new one on gray import. I think that is not a bad price for the lens like this. The lens is though not the sharpest but the Light Transmission is better than 24-105 F4 II and I which helps it keep a bit faster shutter speed at the same focal length upto 70mm
The nonsense gets repeated. “Not the sharpest” compared to what ? The 300 f2.8 IS II ?
Hi Christopher. I bought tamron 24-70 f2.8 . But I gave back. Because of some af issue. And I decided to buy a canon lens. And my budget is not enough for canon 24-70 f2.8. I m thinking about these two lens, 24-70 f4 and 24-105 version 2. The most important thing is sharpness at f4 for me. I watched your 24-105 review and it was really bad about sharpness. even version 2. So what can you say to me about these?I will use it for wedding photography and also "image stabilization" is important for me. Thanks.
Tamron 28-75 😊
please review Tamron 24 70mm f2.8 G2 lens chris
I might buy this lens to replace my 100 mm 2.8 macro L-series. I will not get rid of it, since it's better for serious macro (product) photography, but this macro feature seems perfect for "quick on location work" with it's 0.7x magnification (definately with todays resolutions). Especially nice for weddings. Right now I carry a dedicated macro lens for the rings. But this will be better I think, since it's also a nice backup to my 24-70 2.8, in case something happens. Same goes for all my commercial work: usually I shoot mostly on my 24-70 2.8 @ 4.0-8.0. So this would make a great backup, besides being a macro as well. Also, it's not too heavy or large, which is always nice for a backup lens.
But, now both costs same. And this lens costs less when bundled with any Canon DSLR.
Hello Christopher Frost, which lens do you find sharper: the Canon 24-70mm f4, or the Sigma 24-105 f4? Cheers, and God bless!
They're both as great as each other. The 24-70 might have a slight edge.
Christopher Frost Photography Thanks so much!
@@christopherfrost Good morning sir, Between Canon 24-105mm f/4L Is usm and Canon 24-70mm f/4L usm dis lens, which one is day best for studio use ?
Thanks once again for a very thoughtful & thorough review Christopher. I think if this was priced at $300-$400 I'd be after it, but not for $800.....NO THANK YOU CANON.
I’m looking to invest in a good lens - a multipurpose one. Would you recommend this or something like the 24-105 f4, or perhaps a good one that isn’t an L lens?
24-85 as mentioned here or the tamron 28-75
i really recommend you trying out the sigma 150-600. And the sigma 50-100.
This Video is very good, I am new to photography, I just have a question about the f/4 mark. Does f/4 mean this lens has a fixed aperture of f4? (in your video, you compare the images with not only f4 but f5.6 and so on, if the aperture is fixed how did you change the aperture?) Thank you so much!
Yunbo Wang No, it is Not fixed at f/4. It goes all the way up to around f/22. The f/4 in the name is basically just saying what the widest, or biggest aperture is f/4.
I see, thank you for your kind response!
hey Chris, I know this lense has caused some heated discussions :) basically I am in full frame land now and I am used to my beloved 18-552.8 efs but it doesnt work on a full frame :( I like to do studio work.. which lense would cover a similar range and sharpness? is the one in this review as sharp? or would you recommend another? I also need IS
For a good idea of sharpness, take a look at my review videos. This 24-70 will give you a wider angle but won't zoom in as tightly. I really like the 24-105 - I think that's a better choice overall
+Christopher Frost Photography on one question, regardless of zoom range.. do you think the 24-70 f4 is sharper?
+kdx films I already have rokinon primes for the latter zoom ranges. I miss my 18-55 2.8 but I'm in full frame now so I want something comparable
The 24-70 is a little sharper. Watch the video - I talk about it
+Christopher Frost Photography ok sorry sometimes u just need someone to confirm it
If you have to choose between Sigma Art 18-35 f1.8 DC HSM and Canon EF 24-70mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens for Canon 80D, what would you choose and why?
mainly for portrait, landscape, buildings and just everyday-stuffs.
Well the differences are obvious. If you want a nicer zoom range and IS, then the 24-70. If you want a far brighter aperture and wider angles, the 18-35. Take a look at my review of the 18-35 to see what I thought of it
I have a slight problem... At the moment I'm using a Sigma 18-38 and a Canon 100-400 on my 7D mark ii. I find those 2 lenses work quite nicely but the gap from 38-160 (multiplying the 100 with the crop factor of the small sensor) is quite big. So I wanted to get the 24-70 f4 because it's weather sealed and sort of closes the gap. I'd really like to have a "weather proof" lens but I'm not sure anymore what to go for. Do you have any other suggestions on what could help me out (and that is in a similar price rang).
note: I'd need it for video work as well as normal photography
There's no obvious solution so it's up to you, really. Another option for you is to look at the Canon 24-105 (although, a new version is supposed to be coming out soon)
+Christopher Frost Photography I'm not in a hurry... I have almost a year till I really need it. So you think waiting for a refreshed 24-105 might be an option? (could be a bit pricey maybe :/)
One option of many, yes
Hi, When are you going to test Sigma 50-100 1.8. Waiting eagerly for your confirmation before I invest...
It's taking me a while for various reasons. Should be coming in a month's time (I know I keep saying that to people)
I have a Canon 550D, a 50mm 1.8 (nifty fifty), and 70-200 f4 non is. I want your expert suggestion on what you think i must buy or upgrade in order to get better outdoor pre wedding pictures. Kindly reply. Thanks
You'll probably want a nice Canon 17-55 f/2.8 - a nice fast standard zoom lens. If you want to do wedding photography seriously then you should probably upgrade to full-frame
Hi, I have a 60D with 18-135mm kit lens. Now I want to upgrade to a sharper L series lens. I'm confused between 24-70 and 24-105 f/4. What would you suggest!
Take a look at my reviews and see what would be good for you :-)
What about the RSA? Is it as bad as people talk about it?
Great video as usual , I personally would never purchase this lens. I just don't see what use this lens would be when there are better 2.8 aperture options ?
Hi Chris. I also shoot a 6D and bought this lens when it came out for €1250. I was so disappointed with it! I had never owned an f/4 lens before and it was just too slow for me. I brought it back to the shop and swapped it for a Sigma Art 50 and a Canon 35 f/2 IS. Best decision I ever made!
That definitely is a good decision if you ask me :-)
hai christopher. I have another question. Some people keep telling me that video mode take lots of shutter count. is that true?
Nope
You did not mention that the zoom ring is ultra close to the body making it uncomfortable to use in practice.
Also this lens performance falls off in its mid-range, something you completely failed to demonstrate.
The placement of focus and zoom rings is a question of personal preference. And there is no evidence whatsoever that "this lens performance falls off in its mid-range" as you state.
Hi Christopher, great review - what would you say for price tag of 500 euros.. still bad option for APS-c. or ?
Take a look at the results from this review :-)
I have this lens, i love it, but I'm looking for something lighter to replace it. which lens is a good candidate?
I'm a secret admirer of Canon's old 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 lens but it does have its limitations
tamron 28-75
Do you think it is better then the 18-135? The zoom range and price doesn't bother me. ( I can't try both so I need someone's opinion)
If you need the range, then no.
I"m late I know but my 16-35 mm f2.8 is no longer giving me sharp images so I need a new wide angle lens. I really liked this lense because I had the 16, 24 and 35mm at my disposal. I was sure I wanted to get a prime 35mm f2 but I just found about this lens. I think it has a great assortment of focal lengths (and it has a macro feature!?) so now I"m not so sure about the 35mmg f2. I'm pretty sure I won't be using this lens (if I got it) in low light situations and If I do it'll be for group shots a wedding receptions or wide angle shots of a room on a tripod (for dark areas). In your opinion, is the Canon 35mm f2 a better lens or does this lens have more to offer?
This is better. Colors, range…
It has shorter zoom than 24-105mm, but can make macro shots. But, oh wait, its macro capacities are weak! I don't see any value for this lens. If I'm going to replace the kit 24-105, I think Tamron 24-70mm VC is a better choice.
Hi Christopher, thank you for taking the time to post such terrific reviews. What are your current thoughts on this lens (about $500 used) vs Canon 24-70 2.8 L mark ii (around $1,400 used). For use on a Canon 5D Mark II. Cheers -Matt
Hello Chris, i have a aps c canon760d with sigma comtemporary 17-70mm.
Wath zoom can i have to get more sharp ?
Maybe canon 17-40 f4 L ?
Maybe canon 24-70 L ?
Or maybe canon 24-105 L ?
You mean, you want to replace your 17-70 lens? The 24-105 will be sharpest
Christopher Frost Photography and wath about the 24-70 L ?
Look at my reviews, and you'll see
I was told that the Canon EOS 6D + 24-70mm f4 L IS USM is not available for a full frame camera, is your advice correct in suggesting this lens?, thanks.
Are you asking me if this is a full frame camera lens that will work on a Canon 6D? Watch this review or read the description and you'll find out!
Hi, thanks for your prompt reply, I have been informed the lens you suggest over the 24-70mm f4 L about half way through your video which was a zoom lens does not fit on the Canon EOS 6D, was just wondering of you knew about this?, (Thanks from Australia!).
You mean the 18-135mm lens? As I said in the video, that's an option if you're using an APS-C camera.
Thank you for helping people from all around the world, I am in Australia and I have a basic knowledge of cameras (about 2 hours of basic educations in this field), thanks again for your help and your quick reply.
Another fair-minded and useful review. Thank you. Did you get those 2 emails I sent you Christopher? Love to know what you thought! Trevor
Hi Trevor, yes, I'll try to reply soon :-)
Hi chris, cheers from Argentina, could you review the Tamron 70-200 vc, I heard good things about it, I will have to choose betwen this and the canon 70 200 f4 is. Thanks
Apparently the Tamron lens is very sharp so the ultimate difference is whether you want a smaller and lighter f/4 lens, or a bigger and heavier f/2.8 one.
I have the 70-200 Tamron (VC) and use it for sports photography, paired with a Canon 70d. As I often shoot under lights having the wider aperture was paramount for me, more light means I can get away with faster shutter speeds, which is important if your subject is moving. Sigma makes a very similar lens and Canon have a 2.8 that is similarly priced with no stabilization or a much more expensive and probably a little better stabilized one. For me it was a coin toss between the sigma and the tamron as the canon was out of my price range. I didn't really look at the F4 though as getting more light was key for me.
Sigma 24-105 f/4 Art is an amazing alternative...
This is recomended for videomakers? than 24-105mm f4? i'm videomaker using canon 5d mark ii..
It's good for video makers
Hi Christopher, did you do any testing at 50mm? I have read several times the lens has a weakness here!
My sample is just fine at 50mm. I think it could be a problem with misfocus or sample variation regardless of what Roger Cicala says.
So 24-105 + dedicated macro lens is a way to go?
I have this lens and I LOVE it. I don't find the close-up image quality issues that Chris encountered, and I can achieve extremely sharp Macro photos even at F/4. I would push you toward this lens. It's smaller and more convenient than using the 24-105 + dedicated macro.
or 24-105 and macro tube?
Macro tubes decrease the amount of light you get to your sensor, and since macro photography usually requires a lot of light, I'd still say go with the 24-70 f/4L
I love your accent and your reviews too!!
What is better to choose? 24-70 f4 or 24-105 f / 4?
Why don't you watch the video - I talk about that question.
I'm sorry, maybe I missed this point.
So torn between the 24-70 and the 17-55😬
If you have an APS-C camera, just get the 17-55
+Christopher Frost Photography I do. I think I will. Thanks, great video!
Agreed. The focal range of 24-70 doesn't make a whole lot of sense on APS-C, since 24mm isn't wide enough for general purpose.
I've owned both. Get the Canon 17-55 and never look back!
My Canon Cameras are .. EOS 60D .. EOS 6D and EOS 80D .. My Canon Lenses are .. EF 8 - 15 mm F4L Fisheye USM ... EF 11 - 24 mm F4L USM ... EF 24 - 70 mm F4L IS USM ... EF 70 - 200 mm F4L IS USM ... EF 100 mm F2.8L IS Macro USM ... EF 135 mm F2L USM ... EF 180 mm F3.5L Macro USM ... EF 300 mm F4L IS USM and Extender 2 x .. Waiting for Canon EOS 6D Mark II .. I'm a Travel, Nature, Landscape & Close Up Photographer ( Advanced Amateur ) ...
If I were to buy 1 macro lens, which one would you suggest 100mm or 180mm?
Hello, I'm just getting into videography, I have a Canon 70D and I need a good all around lens, does anyone have any suggestions ? Price is not an issue. I just need a good one for wedding video.
Canon 17-50 f/2.8 IS USM
what happen to your 70D?
+1 I wonder the same.
Read the Description
Read the description
"My Canon 70D had to be sold as I was saving up for my wedding/ honeymoon, so I'm still using my old Canon 60D. It's kind of falling to pieces by now! All pictures and footage shot by me on Canon 6D and 60D cameras."
:((((
question. why most lenses are at their sharpest at f8 or f5.6
There are multiple laws of physics behind general patterns of optical performance
I'll look it up... Great job by the way
I saw this on Amazon for £300 uses x display
can its macro zoom take very close up insect photos?
Watch the video, and you'll see how it performs as a macro lens.
i have this lens for my 6D ... & I am happy. ...... Got it for 650 $
Doesn’t this leans come with the 5d mark 4
It's probably one of the kit lens options, yes
please review Zeiss Milvus 1.4/50 chris!😁
I'm thinking about it
Why don't Canon just do a god damn 18-55 L series lens for aps-c like fuji. It's much more useable.
Watching these vids in 2021 when you say "a shocking £500" and they are now like £800 :'(
How does it compare to the 2.8?
Cheaper 😊
is this good for sports?
Outdoor, yes. Indoor might be pushing it.
Would this work wi5 my canon 200d
Yes. All Canon mount lenses made since 1987 will work on your Canon APS-C digital SLR camera, except EF-M lenses
is it good for regular picture taking?
?
One day I wanna do a drinking game with my friends... After covid and stuff... One for every "indeed"
Jk - I really enjoy your reviews and base a lot of decisions on them! Thank you :D