I wish that things were rightand all these things ,one could trust and fall in step with.We believe all of it. But some do not.What then to do,If error Has power and has infiltrated everywhere?
I listen to a lot of Father ripperger stalks and they are very good but in one of his statements where he says that if a bishop consecrates Bishops without the approval of the Pope they are in schism when in fact they are not and if he is referring to the sspx Bishop's that were consecrated by Archbishop Marcel LeFebvre which Pope Benedict XVI lifted the unjust excommunications of these Bishops where would be the traditional Latin Mass be if it wasn't for Archbishop Marcel LeFebvre
Fr. Ripperger might be referring to bishops consecrated by Bp. Williamson. In the case of Abp. Lefebvre it is obvious that he consecrated auxiliary bishops, and did not have the intention of creating a parallel hierarchy, but rather acted because he felt threatened and had already requested permission to consecrate the bishops. Abp. Lefebvre consecrated priests decades younger than him to become bishops, and it was a similar situation with Bp. Rangel, after Bp. Castro Mayer died without an legitimate episcopal successor, Bp. Rangel's excommunication was lifted also like the SSPX bishops. Those situations are unlike Bp. Williamson and other "Independent" Bishops or any other episcopacy not in communion with the Holy See. This is the type of clear schismatic act that Fr. is referring to, the consecration of bishops without papal mandate without a grave reason.
Thank you for videos that inform and teach.
Thank you. So help to help teach our children these parts of the catechism.
Amem! Thank you father. 3 Hail Marys for the priest.
I wish that things were rightand all these things ,one could trust and fall in step with.We believe all of it. But some do not.What then to do,If error Has power and has infiltrated everywhere?
Amen
I listen to a lot of Father ripperger stalks and they are very good but in one of his statements where he says that if a bishop consecrates Bishops without the approval of the Pope they are in schism when in fact they are not and if he is referring to the sspx Bishop's that were consecrated by Archbishop Marcel LeFebvre which Pope Benedict XVI lifted the unjust excommunications of these Bishops where would be the traditional Latin Mass be if it wasn't for Archbishop Marcel LeFebvre
Fr. Ripperger might be referring to bishops consecrated by Bp. Williamson. In the case of Abp. Lefebvre it is obvious that he consecrated auxiliary bishops, and did not have the intention of creating a parallel hierarchy, but rather acted because he felt threatened and had already requested permission to consecrate the bishops.
Abp. Lefebvre consecrated priests decades younger than him to become bishops, and it was a similar situation with Bp. Rangel, after Bp. Castro Mayer died without an legitimate episcopal successor, Bp. Rangel's excommunication was lifted also like the SSPX bishops.
Those situations are unlike Bp. Williamson and other "Independent" Bishops or any other episcopacy not in communion with the Holy See. This is the type of clear schismatic act that Fr. is referring to, the consecration of bishops without papal mandate without a grave reason.