How do you defend using 1 Enoch? I do appreciate it myself, but I am very surprised to see the AF channel quoting that book, even to title a series "Lord of Spirits". I always hold myself to refrain as much as possible from quoting it.
To use an unofficial apocryphal text the church has said is outside the canon but permissible on the periphery to gain better understanding of the canon, ancient context of phrases and words in the Bible, patterns in it, and refutation of heresies that go further over the line than Apocryphal texts, and to understand/undermine arguments used against us?
![Lord of Spirits - Loosed in Heaven [Ep. 58]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IaySvQJodXg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Lord of Spirits - Loosed in Heaven [Ep. 58]](/img/tr.png)
![Lord of Spirits - Thunder Gods and the God Who Thundered [Ep. 49]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gheuQ5uWpwQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Lord of Spirits - The Book of Jubilees [Ep. 92]](/img/n.gif)
Oh my! At the explanation of the “bells”, I too rolled my eyes.
3:28:50 the timestamp that convinces me to become a monk (along other things, of course)
How do you defend using 1 Enoch?
I do appreciate it myself, but I am very surprised to see the AF channel quoting that book, even to title a series "Lord of Spirits". I always hold myself to refrain as much as possible from quoting it.
Read chapter 3 of Tertullian’s “on the apparel of women”
To use an unofficial apocryphal text the church has said is outside the canon but permissible on the periphery to gain better understanding of the canon, ancient context of phrases and words in the Bible, patterns in it, and refutation of heresies that go further over the line than Apocryphal texts, and to understand/undermine arguments used against us?