"Maybe women don't know that they want someone like Andrew Tate". How is that logical? How would you not know whether or not you want something? How is it that Andrew Tate has the capacity to know everything about himself in addition to knowing what other people don't know? This is insanity.
Because he is Neo and he has escaped the matrix 😂 it’s just that for some reason he is having difficulties with women at the moment. 😂 but once he has freed his mind whew! He will just wave his hand and women will worship him!
Andrew never said that, that was the therapist building rapport using the existence of emotional women that aren't as logical as men, it's done by professionals all the time, one day they believe this, the other day they believe that, it depends on the person they're getting information from, because that's the goal in order to help them... so nothing insane about it, unless you were just being emotional
One reason that Tate might see crying and emotions in others as pure manipulation is that he is a very manipulative person and if he were to cry or show weakness of any kind it would only be in the situation of trying to manipulate someone - therefore that’s what other people are trying to do. When actually a child cries, a grown up wells up with emotion and cries they are just feeling their feelings and his reaction is not a consideration. He has choice in that moment to attune to the person who is upset or to berate/neglect /ignore them but their crying is not a conscious decision, it is involuntary and instinctual like a sneeze. Nobody sneezes to get a “bless you” but people say it anyway. Honestly I just think this guy has grown up in absence of love and connection and rather than covering it up he makes it obvious by everything he says. I actually have pity for him despite the fact his level of inability to empathise I believe is dangerous and has caused harm to women in some form or another and it inspires dangerous behaviours and belief in others … but if I take away his propensity to hurt others, I feel bad for this dude. His 40 super cars won’t fill that void … has anyone told him? The fact he has 40, I think he must be thinking the next one is gonna do the trick 😅
That makes so much sense and I agree! He might be projecting the manipulative behavior onto other people because maybe he’s worried that he will be seen as manipulative if he shows vulnerability.
Wrong, first of all, he said he has 40 cars because he couldn't care less to sell his old ones... Obviously... Second, he said there's nothing wrong with showing emotion, as long as you still do what you're supposed to do as a man, instead of losing your emotional control, because that's when it becomes dangerous, because violent outbursts and brutal murder are actions influenced by emotions. Emotional control means controlling the ((influence emotions have over our actions)), we obviously can't control emotions themselves, which is why Andrew also says "Heartbreak? Good, now you have an unlimited source of energy you can channel in the right direction". And who told you he's manipulative?? Not a Single Allegation was Ever Proven Once... To this day... (while he's literally being targeted by governments, which spent BILLIONS in an attempt to combat his Massive influence over the young military age males, the future of our world, that he's telling to do their absolute all, give their fitness their absolute all, give their diet their absolute all, every single day, regardless of how they feel, to be a brand new man in the mirror in the next hundred days, for the benefit of themselves and most importantly everyone around them, because they'll look back and say that it was the greatest decision they've ever made.
I am often reminded of how The Matrix - a film created by 2 transwomen and in part, an allegory for trans-identity, was co-opted by the manosphere to promote their completely opposite belief system. And then that reminds me how the "involuntary celibate" community was originally created by a young woman intending it as a support network for awkward college students, but it was also eventually co-opted by the same toxic bros who radialise young men and terrorize the public today
And I'm often reminded of how lgnorant people are after reading comments like yours, those woman are irrelevant... Andrew Literally explained it in his most famous interview, showing how lgnorant you really are... He said he uses that term from the movie Matrix, to help people understand a faIse version of reality/matrix-agen,da that's mindlessly being pushed by agents, while they go against anyone who doesn't do the same, because that movie shows it perfectly, and you have to be a child to not understand that there are people who mindIessly push an agenda and go against anyone who doesn't.
It always irks me to hear a guy say that a woman cannot be logical, and believe it, or not there are a lot more of them than people think. I even remember some guys telling me at the university that I shouldn’t major in philosophy, because I am a woman and that there are no good female philosophers and that they are not capable of higher reasoning. It was so demoralizing.
Us men are obviously saying it from personal experience, why else would we?? I've spent many years talking with my mother, and even she herself begged me, my brother and my father, to not treat her like a man, because women are emotional, not logical like men. That's exactly what she said..
@@test1122lol Very interesting! I know that when I was in high school and even during my first few years in university I had received a lot of flack for thinking a lot more like a man than a woman being very logical, philosophically oriented and not showing emotions, but I would remind people to stop putting ALL the women in boxes, and that I am who I am. It used to bother me only in the beginning when people would tell be that I should be “more lady-like”, but I have learned to cope with it.
@@sylviaowega3839 Yea, obviously not every woman is the same, Andrew said that as well, so just keep in mind that what guys mean is in general based on what they've experienced.. 👍🏻
@@test1122lolI think what's important here is to not stereotype everyone based off of your social or cultural expectations. Predetermining and judging someone's personality from simply having a penis/no penis is as dumb and irrational as thinking people of a certain race are the same. At least you can admit the fact that not every woman is the same. Keep that in mind.
Literally watch any video of him and his daughter, she begging to run up to him while happily yelling daddy! You people are all so lgnorant... His kids obviously adore him
@@Mama_Bear524 While trying to talk down to someone, that troll accidentally agreed with them that AT has a faulty belief system that needs to be questioned. I lol'd.
"When men cry to their wives, a lot of is to inspire sympathy (...)". Huh. So Andrew Tate believes that showing emotion is only done to control one's environment and is unable to view a world where people express their emotions simply because they have emotions and show them. People do not simply have emotions and feel them because they just happen to be there, in his worldview. Everything has an agenda behind it. However, in an earlier portion of this interview, he states that, while in prison, "tears ran down his face" but he "wasn't crying". However, he was in prison and (probably) alone when tears ran down his face. In that instance, he wasn't trying to elicit anything from anyone or control his environment. He was just experiencing his own emotions. An action that completely contradicts his prior statement. It's certainly a statement of his cognitive dissonance there. He can't see that he, himself, has and shows emotion without necessarily seeking to manipulate- but just because he has emotions. I wonder what happened to make him that way. It must have been something when he was extremely young- maybe even a baby or toddler.
Wrong, he said there's nothing wrong with showing emotion, as long as you still do what you're supposed to do as a man, instead of losing your emotional control, because that's when it becomes dangerous, because violent outbursts and brutal murder are actions influenced by emotions. Emotional control means controlling the ((influence emotions have over our actions)), we obviously can't control emotions themselves, which is why Andrew also says "Heartbreak? Good, now you have an unlimited source of energy you can channel in the right direction".
@@test1122lol Got it. Thanks for the clarification! :) However, he also stated- in this very video, might I add, that, "when men cry to their wives, a lot of is to inspire sympathy," no? It's literally in this exact video. So, in my understanding, there is a contradiction there, in a sense- even with his statement about heartbreak and using heartbreak as a source of motivation. His actions, words, and beliefs don't all match up somewhere. I'm not saying this to attack him as an individual- I'm sure we all have this to some extent. On the other hand, he has allegedly trafficked people and raped numerous individuals, so... if that is all true, then he is certainly a very, very broken individual.
@@test1122lol Actually, you're not exactly right either. He said specifically "a man should do what he's supposed to do *regardless of* how he feels". He didn't say anything about being *ok to show* emotions. This little word 'regardless' is so much more revealing than it seems, and it only goes to confirm, yet again, that Tate espouses emotional *avoidance*, not emotional control. It looks to me like you may be conflating those two concepts because y may not be all that familiar with what emotional control really entails, seeing as you oversimplify it by jumping to the *very last step* of the emotional contol process - which is "controlling (I prefer the word "managing", but alright) the influence emotions have over our actions." There are a few more steps before this last one which if you skip, and go straight for the last one, you end up engaging in emotional suppression and avoidance, rather than emotional control. So going back to the word *regardless*. It means - without regard for, without paying attention to. Essentially ignoring, avoiding. Then Tate goes on to mention examples of murder and violence as outbursts of emotion. That's right! Again, one word is key here - outburst. A burst out. A burst of emotions from within a person. And why do such emotional outbursts happen? Exactly because of emotional avoidance, where emotions are pent up and *burst out* in one go, like a bomb, because they haven't been processed correctly (because they haven't gone through the entirety of the emotional control *process*). Yes, the devil really is in such minute details like a word or two here and there. And apart from knowing that to be true personally, I can also speak to that professionally as a linguist.
Got curious about this Sutcliffe guy, so I decided to look at his twitter and holy CRAP. Pinned tweet is a multi-paragraph statement about how the matrix WILL find you and the only way to escape is to embrace the world's inequality without attempting to change it. Lots of talk about how you can just make yourself happy by letting go and embracing the circumstances, very reminiscent of Tate's work and the overall manosphere "grindset" philosophy. There was one tweet about how (paraphrasing) "your feelings are depressed but you are not." Misogyny isn't a driving force of his page like it is on Tate's, but there are a few retweets of videos of women doing bad things with captions like "we're quick to recognize evil in men but it's in women too." Weirdly, because his page isn't as openly hateful as Tate's, it's a lot easier to keep dumbfoundedly scrolling. I had to force myself to stop after like 30 tweets or else I knew I was gonna be there all day
It's just like in the movie Matrix, it consists of agents, who mindlessIy push a faIse version of reality/matrix-agen,da while going against anyone who doesn't do the same...
It’s amazing that women are even capable of doing evil with our inferior, weak, illogical brains and soft, squishy bodies. (Sarcasm) What I’m legit curious about with people like Tate and Sutcliffe is: how do they justify their dependence on women for sex and relationships (at least one of those is true, if he has ‘double-digit children’) without the woman hatred splashing onto them? Is there any cognitive dissonance there? Or are they all just “hit it and quit it”?
Are they incapble to see that buying fancy cars and being popular or even making a lot of money isn't logical but emotional as well. I think they setup their reality in such a way that they are incapable to interact with the intelligence of woman and surround themselves with superficial relationships. Not because that's how the world works but that's all they can actually handle emotionally themselves, because any form of real vulnerability will break the fourth wall of a top-G
You should be failed for not knowing what building rapport is, professionals do it literally all the time, one day they believe this, the other day they believe that, it depends on the person they're getting information from, because that's the goal.....
Diversity/cultural competency training is a requirement in medical training, and a prerequisite for being credentialed to practice medicine in the U.S. in many states. I would hope that similar is true for therapists and psychologists, but I don't know. I'm sure plenty of misogynistic therapists exist, and that they could really harm someone who's in a vulnerable frame of mind.
Good stuff. I am let down by the fact that the therapist is supporting Andrew's faulty belief system specifically about women and the so-called matrix. I looked on his Instagram and it seems a lot of people are not pleased he's even doing the "therapy". I plan on getting my master's and doctorate in clinical psychology and I'm fascinated by different techniques. There has to be a balance between not taking a side, but also letting the person know when they're out of line.
It's called building rapport, interrogators do it literally all the time, one day they believe this, the other day they believe that, it depends on the person they're getting information from, because that's the goal.....
I thought daddy Honda watched this first before he reacted. Well I would like it if Dr. H kept with it. I just graduated from college and I saw a lot of men in my classes who were entitled, apathetic, lacked empathy, and unwilling to think critically. A lot of these kids grew up in high school during the pandemic. These kids are just different! How can we help them?!
I do know that some women are attracted to Andrew Tate, but that is only because like most narcissists, he has this display manly confidence, and his are attracted to celebrity status. That’s it.
He doesn't display manly confidence at all. He quite transparently displays all his insecurities. Women who are still attracted to him after he starts talking probably think the same way he does, or they see themselves the same way he sees them: not worth much.
Gilmore Girls is my favourite show and, even though Christopher is actually not that good a person, it sort of breaks my heart to see David Sutcliff saying these things. Edit : WTF, when Andrew Tate is the logical human..... You would have to be low
Is it possible to be the father to like 12 kids for example and actually be able to create and environment in which they grow up with a good father figure and good parenting? like will the time u have with them and stuff be enough or is it just by default kind of a bad situation? [i say this thinking about certain famous men who have multiple kids with multiple different women]
Few generations ago many families would aim to have 8 children. Because of diseases most would die. In some families none would die and they are stuck with all 8 lol Also they help at the farm. The reason was different before. Now it seems odd having more than 4 kids. It seems detrimental actually because life is more expensive now than generations ago.
I mean, maybe not if you only have a 2 caregivers, but there are plenty of cultures w radically different caregiving structures where many more people would be involved. If you’re trying for a nuclear family kind of thing, it’s probably significantly difficult, and often dysfunctional, but it’s irresponsible to make absolute statements
No i was with a girl that was #6 of #13 kids the oldest was 28 the youngest was 1yr old and what happens is tge oldest pare up with the second youngest and the next oldest so on and so forth and they take care of each other like that while mom takes care of the new born And so what happens is they end up with "3 or 4 different moms" because the oldest girls are basically the mom for there younger siblings its kinda phucked up
@@SheikhN-bible-syndromeI think this is the majority of huge families or all of them. And certainly the dads (especially ones like Tate who are just in it to collect kids to be “manly”) aren’t being dads.
If women are angry at men like Andrew Tate, it's only because they are actively encouraging harmful mindsets in young men and even, at this point, children. There's nothing that riles people up as much as 'harming children'. Frankly if he wasn't spouting off such terrible life advice, most people would write him off as a harmless nutjob who doesn't need to be interfered with. I genuinely feel that the vitriol people have towards him is in some ways justified. My own dad fell into this trap and I've seen how arrogant it's made him and how mean he is towards my mom now. Going down the manosphere rabbit hole doesn't just hurt the man, it hurts everyone around him.
Well this has take a turn down a dark alley. SEE?!!! This is what I mean about Andrew Tate! He starts out tolerable... and then BAM! The switch is flipped. ☺
If the children were conceived as part of treating women like cattle, I doubt AT is a "loving father". In fact, if the mothers are actually part of the case against him, I don't believe they'd allow their children around him? The whole thing is very suspect. Are the kids also in captivity?
i tried to give this psychologist the benefit of the doubt, telling myself that he might be different from the other tiktok therapist but in the hand he is not that different. had some pretty good points but this rigid way of thinking and this outward bias against the person he is analysing make it hard to take any of this seriously. At least he is eloquent
So, you got sidetracked by the misogyny, and skipped a part, cuz I watched the whole thing. I think David may have been kind of joking with A.T. possibly, don't know if I would believe he really believes women are illogical. Anyway, David brought up some good points of what the women had to say, when they complained about A.T. and then said, "How can I answer them? What do I say to that?" As if they brought up some valuable points.
If you weren't so lgnorant with such a destroyed attention span, and listened to just a few more seconds of Kirk explaining who he is, you would've instantly heard kirk say that he quit being an actor and decided to pursue therapy to help people.. therefore, he is an actual therapist, Not some actor...
@@test1122lol The nice way to reply would have been something like, "As Kirk said earlier, he quit being an actor and became a therapist". But hey, you went back and watched videos before commenting this time, that's great personal growth :) .
@@ExtraordinaryMachine333 Of course, but is sounding nice always the best option? In this case it wouldn't be as memorable as being abrasive, therefore the chance they'll do the same thing again would be higher..
The ads on your videos are getting out of control! Ad just to watch the video, 3 mins in another ad! Three minutes in!!!!! The other day I clocked a total of 6 ads that you can skip AND the ads you have yourself within the video. This is crazy!
They are right if a woman hates you there is a part in her which loves you or at least sexul arousal, the oposite of love is not hate. And Yes scientficaly woman are not stupid but at the avarage they are higher on anxiety scores and mental instability…thus on the avarge they make less racional decissions.
If the children were conceived as part of treating women like cattle, I doubt AT is a "loving father". In fact, if the mothers are actually part of the case against him, I don't believe they'd allow their children around him? The whole thing is very suspect. Are the kids also in captivity?
They are right if a woman hates you there is a part in her which loves you or at least sexul arousal, the oposite of love is not hate. And Yes scientficaly woman are not stupid but at the avarage they are higher on anxiety scores and mental instability…thus on the avarge they make less racional decissions.
It really helps my negative subconscious beliefs, knowing that men like Dr Honda exist. Thanks Kirk, your reactions and opinions are appreciated.
What about knowing that there's someone else out there, just like you, but the best version of you there could possibly be?
Word.
What a terrible day to have ears.
"Maybe women don't know that they want someone like Andrew Tate". How is that logical? How would you not know whether or not you want something? How is it that Andrew Tate has the capacity to know everything about himself in addition to knowing what other people don't know? This is insanity.
Because he is Neo and he has escaped the matrix 😂 it’s just that for some reason he is having difficulties with women at the moment. 😂 but once he has freed his mind whew! He will just wave his hand and women will worship him!
Andrew never said that, that was the therapist building rapport using the existence of emotional women that aren't as logical as men, it's done by professionals all the time, one day they believe this, the other day they believe that, it depends on the person they're getting information from, because that's the goal in order to help them... so nothing insane about it, unless you were just being emotional
@@test1122lolthose were certainly…words
@@test1122lol God I love being emotional, it's my favorite thing to do as a woman. I just love it.
@@test1122lol what the AF are you talking about?
One reason that Tate might see crying and emotions in others as pure manipulation is that he is a very manipulative person and if he were to cry or show weakness of any kind it would only be in the situation of trying to manipulate someone - therefore that’s what other people are trying to do. When actually a child cries, a grown up wells up with emotion and cries they are just feeling their feelings and his reaction is not a consideration. He has choice in that moment to attune to the person who is upset or to berate/neglect /ignore them but their crying is not a conscious decision, it is involuntary and instinctual like a sneeze. Nobody sneezes to get a “bless you” but people say it anyway. Honestly I just think this guy has grown up in absence of love and connection and rather than covering it up he makes it obvious by everything he says. I actually have pity for him despite the fact his level of inability to empathise I believe is dangerous and has caused harm to women in some form or another and it inspires dangerous behaviours and belief in others … but if I take away his propensity to hurt others, I feel bad for this dude. His 40 super cars won’t fill that void … has anyone told him? The fact he has 40, I think he must be thinking the next one is gonna do the trick 😅
Good comment. 💔
I agree! I was thinking the same things
That makes so much sense and I agree! He might be projecting the manipulative behavior onto other people because maybe he’s worried that he will be seen as manipulative if he shows vulnerability.
Wrong, first of all, he said he has 40 cars because he couldn't care less to sell his old ones... Obviously... Second, he said there's nothing wrong with showing emotion, as long as you still do what you're supposed to do as a man, instead of losing your emotional control, because that's when it becomes dangerous, because violent outbursts and brutal murder are actions influenced by emotions. Emotional control means controlling the ((influence emotions have over our actions)), we obviously can't control emotions themselves, which is why Andrew also says "Heartbreak? Good, now you have an unlimited source of energy you can channel in the right direction". And who told you he's manipulative?? Not a Single Allegation was Ever Proven Once... To this day... (while he's literally being targeted by governments, which spent BILLIONS in an attempt to combat his Massive influence over the young military age males, the future of our world, that he's telling to do their absolute all, give their fitness their absolute all, give their diet their absolute all, every single day, regardless of how they feel, to be a brand new man in the mirror in the next hundred days, for the benefit of themselves and most importantly everyone around them, because they'll look back and say that it was the greatest decision they've ever made.
Your comment seems to have found the tate fan base. I hope they take care of themselves 💖
We appreciate your sacrifice
I am often reminded of how The Matrix - a film created by 2 transwomen and in part, an allegory for trans-identity, was co-opted by the manosphere to promote their completely opposite belief system. And then that reminds me how the "involuntary celibate" community was originally created by a young woman intending it as a support network for awkward college students, but it was also eventually co-opted by the same toxic bros who radialise young men and terrorize the public today
And I'm often reminded of how lgnorant people are after reading comments like yours, those woman are irrelevant... Andrew Literally explained it in his most famous interview, showing how lgnorant you really are... He said he uses that term from the movie Matrix, to help people understand a faIse version of reality/matrix-agen,da that's mindlessly being pushed by agents, while they go against anyone who doesn't do the same, because that movie shows it perfectly, and you have to be a child to not understand that there are people who mindIessly push an agenda and go against anyone who doesn't.
@@test1122lol Well those are certainly...thoughts
@Chromebiscuit if even that... Word salad. 🫠
So glad you are as disturbed by these 2 as many of us watching. Cheers to you!
It always irks me to hear a guy say that a woman cannot be logical, and believe it, or not there are a lot more of them than people think. I even remember some guys telling me at the university that I shouldn’t major in philosophy, because I am a woman and that there are no good female philosophers and that they are not capable of higher reasoning. It was so demoralizing.
Us men are obviously saying it from personal experience, why else would we?? I've spent many years talking with my mother, and even she herself begged me, my brother and my father, to not treat her like a man, because women are emotional, not logical like men. That's exactly what she said..
@@test1122lol Very interesting! I know that when I was in high school and even during my first few years in university I had received a lot of flack for thinking a lot more like a man than a woman being very logical, philosophically oriented and not showing emotions, but I would remind people to stop putting ALL the women in boxes, and that I am who I am. It used to bother me only in the beginning when people would tell be that I should be “more lady-like”, but I have learned to cope with it.
@@sylviaowega3839 Yea, obviously not every woman is the same, Andrew said that as well, so just keep in mind that what guys mean is in general based on what they've experienced.. 👍🏻
@@test1122lolI think what's important here is to not stereotype everyone based off of your social or cultural expectations. Predetermining and judging someone's personality from simply having a penis/no penis is as dumb and irrational as thinking people of a certain race are the same. At least you can admit the fact that not every woman is the same. Keep that in mind.
@@test1122lolMany people also misinterpret Andrew Tate, as well. Thinking outside the box is a rare thing indeed! Lol
If all crying is manipulation, then why do people often cry when they are alone??!
Exactly. Tate is a moron
What about when people cry when no one is around?
They're manipulating themselves lol
Ha!
“Well maybe he is a loving father” 😂😂
He even laughed when he said it 😂
From the leaked videos of him with his daughter, he seems like a loving father.
@@adirondackmama7724 I’m sure 😂😂😂😂
Literally watch any video of him and his daughter, she begging to run up to him while happily yelling daddy! You people are all so lgnorant... His kids obviously adore him
Someone sent me a video of him (seemingly) being a loving father to his daughter. But who knows.
Dr honda's double take during the plot twist was priceless 😂 3:30
I love the guy in here who is obsessively defending and excusing Tate.
Who
test1122lol
Someone’s got the hots for daddy Tate.
@@Mama_Bear524 While trying to talk down to someone, that troll accidentally agreed with them that AT has a faulty belief system that needs to be questioned. I lol'd.
"When men cry to their wives, a lot of is to inspire sympathy (...)". Huh. So Andrew Tate believes that showing emotion is only done to control one's environment and is unable to view a world where people express their emotions simply because they have emotions and show them. People do not simply have emotions and feel them because they just happen to be there, in his worldview. Everything has an agenda behind it.
However, in an earlier portion of this interview, he states that, while in prison, "tears ran down his face" but he "wasn't crying". However, he was in prison and (probably) alone when tears ran down his face. In that instance, he wasn't trying to elicit anything from anyone or control his environment. He was just experiencing his own emotions. An action that completely contradicts his prior statement.
It's certainly a statement of his cognitive dissonance there. He can't see that he, himself, has and shows emotion without necessarily seeking to manipulate- but just because he has emotions.
I wonder what happened to make him that way. It must have been something when he was extremely young- maybe even a baby or toddler.
Wrong, he said there's nothing wrong with showing emotion, as long as you still do what you're supposed to do as a man, instead of losing your emotional control, because that's when it becomes dangerous, because violent outbursts and brutal murder are actions influenced by emotions. Emotional control means controlling the ((influence emotions have over our actions)), we obviously can't control emotions themselves, which is why Andrew also says "Heartbreak? Good, now you have an unlimited source of energy you can channel in the right direction".
@@test1122loldamn. Kid you’re literally replying to every comment here 😂 are you ok lol breath man
@@test1122lol Got it. Thanks for the clarification! :)
However, he also stated- in this very video, might I add, that, "when men cry to their wives, a lot of is to inspire sympathy," no? It's literally in this exact video. So, in my understanding, there is a contradiction there, in a sense- even with his statement about heartbreak and using heartbreak as a source of motivation. His actions, words, and beliefs don't all match up somewhere.
I'm not saying this to attack him as an individual- I'm sure we all have this to some extent.
On the other hand, he has allegedly trafficked people and raped numerous individuals, so... if that is all true, then he is certainly a very, very broken individual.
@@test1122lol Actually, you're not exactly right either. He said specifically "a man should do what he's supposed to do *regardless of* how he feels". He didn't say anything about being *ok to show* emotions.
This little word 'regardless' is so much more revealing than it seems, and it only goes to confirm, yet again, that Tate espouses emotional *avoidance*, not emotional control.
It looks to me like you may be conflating those two concepts because y may not be all that familiar with what emotional control really entails, seeing as you oversimplify it by jumping to the *very last step* of the emotional contol process - which is "controlling (I prefer the word "managing", but alright) the influence emotions have over our actions."
There are a few more steps before this last one which if you skip, and go straight for the last one, you end up engaging in emotional suppression and avoidance, rather than emotional control.
So going back to the word *regardless*. It means - without regard for, without paying attention to. Essentially ignoring, avoiding.
Then Tate goes on to mention examples of murder and violence as outbursts of emotion.
That's right! Again, one word is key here - outburst. A burst out. A burst of emotions from within a person.
And why do such emotional outbursts happen? Exactly because of emotional avoidance, where emotions are pent up and *burst out* in one go, like a bomb, because they haven't been processed correctly (because they haven't gone through the entirety of the emotional control *process*).
Yes, the devil really is in such minute details like a word or two here and there. And apart from knowing that to be true personally, I can also speak to that professionally as a linguist.
@@donato286 I enjoyed your analysis there, thank you :)
Got curious about this Sutcliffe guy, so I decided to look at his twitter and holy CRAP. Pinned tweet is a multi-paragraph statement about how the matrix WILL find you and the only way to escape is to embrace the world's inequality without attempting to change it. Lots of talk about how you can just make yourself happy by letting go and embracing the circumstances, very reminiscent of Tate's work and the overall manosphere "grindset" philosophy. There was one tweet about how (paraphrasing) "your feelings are depressed but you are not." Misogyny isn't a driving force of his page like it is on Tate's, but there are a few retweets of videos of women doing bad things with captions like "we're quick to recognize evil in men but it's in women too."
Weirdly, because his page isn't as openly hateful as Tate's, it's a lot easier to keep dumbfoundedly scrolling. I had to force myself to stop after like 30 tweets or else I knew I was gonna be there all day
It's just like in the movie Matrix, it consists of agents, who mindlessIy push a faIse version of reality/matrix-agen,da while going against anyone who doesn't do the same...
@@test1122lollike Tate and Sutcliffe? Ya. We know.
It’s amazing that women are even capable of doing evil with our inferior, weak, illogical brains and soft, squishy bodies. (Sarcasm) What I’m legit curious about with people like Tate and Sutcliffe is: how do they justify their dependence on women for sex and relationships (at least one of those is true, if he has ‘double-digit children’) without the woman hatred splashing onto them? Is there any cognitive dissonance there? Or are they all just “hit it and quit it”?
Are they incapble to see that buying fancy cars and being popular or even making a lot of money isn't logical but emotional as well. I think they setup their reality in such a way that they are incapable to interact with the intelligence of woman and surround themselves with superficial relationships. Not because that's how the world works but that's all they can actually handle emotionally themselves, because any form of real vulnerability will break the fourth wall of a top-G
Annnd finally this charade is revealed as an exercise solely in gaining narcissistic supply
"Yeah, gross" i agree
Out of curiosity, can you fail a student or revoke their certification if they are openly misogynistic during their education?
You should be failed for not knowing what building rapport is, professionals do it literally all the time, one day they believe this, the other day they believe that, it depends on the person they're getting information from, because that's the goal.....
Diversity/cultural competency training is a requirement in medical training, and a prerequisite for being credentialed to practice medicine in the U.S. in many states. I would hope that similar is true for therapists and psychologists, but I don't know. I'm sure plenty of misogynistic therapists exist, and that they could really harm someone who's in a vulnerable frame of mind.
I feel crying is mostly a release like with a pressure cooker in it's need to release steam as do we.
Good stuff. I am let down by the fact that the therapist is supporting Andrew's faulty belief system specifically about women and the so-called matrix. I looked on his Instagram and it seems a lot of people are not pleased he's even doing the "therapy".
I plan on getting my master's and doctorate in clinical psychology and I'm fascinated by different techniques. There has to be a balance between not taking a side, but also letting the person know when they're out of line.
It's called building rapport, interrogators do it literally all the time, one day they believe this, the other day they believe that, it depends on the person they're getting information from, because that's the goal.....
There are people who don't need therapy like me...therapy is for weak people.
The irony of the AT-loving troll test1122lol accidentally agreeing that AT has a faulty belief system, just makes me smile.
didn't watch the original video so on 3:31 I had the exact same reaction as Kirk
I thought daddy Honda watched this first before he reacted. Well I would like it if Dr. H kept with it. I just graduated from college and I saw a lot of men in my classes who were entitled, apathetic, lacked empathy, and unwilling to think critically. A lot of these kids grew up in high school during the pandemic. These kids are just different! How can we help them?!
For Andrew Tate to tell someone else not to be a misogynist, that means he thinks he's not a misogynist?! That part was crazy.
Omggg ‘downward arrow technique’ gives me LIFE! Would you say that’s what’s starting to happen here / what you’re describing (around 16:00)?
I do know that some women are attracted to Andrew Tate, but that is only because like most narcissists, he has this display manly confidence, and his are attracted to celebrity status. That’s it.
He doesn't display manly confidence at all. He quite transparently displays all his insecurities. Women who are still attracted to him after he starts talking probably think the same way he does, or they see themselves the same way he sees them: not worth much.
I hated David Sutcliffe in Gilmore Girls and I hate him now
Gilmore Girls is my favourite show and, even though Christopher is actually not that good a person, it sort of breaks my heart to see David Sutcliff saying these things.
Edit : WTF, when Andrew Tate is the logical human..... You would have to be low
Is it possible to be the father to like 12 kids for example and actually be able to create and environment in which they grow up with a good father figure and good parenting? like will the time u have with them and stuff be enough or is it just by default kind of a bad situation? [i say this thinking about certain famous men who have multiple kids with multiple different women]
Few generations ago many families would aim to have 8 children. Because of diseases most would die. In some families none would die and they are stuck with all 8 lol
Also they help at the farm. The reason was different before. Now it seems odd having more than 4 kids. It seems detrimental actually because life is more expensive now than generations ago.
I mean, maybe not if you only have a 2 caregivers, but there are plenty of cultures w radically different caregiving structures where many more people would be involved. If you’re trying for a nuclear family kind of thing, it’s probably significantly difficult, and often dysfunctional, but it’s irresponsible to make absolute statements
No i was with a girl that was #6 of #13 kids the oldest was 28 the youngest was 1yr old and what happens is tge oldest pare up with the second youngest and the next oldest so on and so forth and they take care of each other like that while mom takes care of the new born
And so what happens is they end up with "3 or 4 different moms" because the oldest girls are basically the mom for there younger siblings its kinda phucked up
Idk, my grandparents had 12 siblings each, but their parents never told them “I love you.” So idk
@@SheikhN-bible-syndromeI think this is the majority of huge families or all of them.
And certainly the dads (especially ones like Tate who are just in it to collect kids to be “manly”) aren’t being dads.
If women are angry at men like Andrew Tate, it's only because they are actively encouraging harmful mindsets in young men and even, at this point, children. There's nothing that riles people up as much as 'harming children'. Frankly if he wasn't spouting off such terrible life advice, most people would write him off as a harmless nutjob who doesn't need to be interfered with. I genuinely feel that the vitriol people have towards him is in some ways justified. My own dad fell into this trap and I've seen how arrogant it's made him and how mean he is towards my mom now. Going down the manosphere rabbit hole doesn't just hurt the man, it hurts everyone around him.
Well this has take a turn down a dark alley. SEE?!!! This is what I mean about Andrew Tate! He starts out tolerable... and then BAM! The switch is flipped. ☺
If the children were conceived as part of treating women like cattle, I doubt AT is a "loving father". In fact, if the mothers are actually part of the case against him, I don't believe they'd allow their children around him? The whole thing is very suspect. Are the kids also in captivity?
i tried to give this psychologist the benefit of the doubt, telling myself that he might be different from the other tiktok therapist but in the hand he is not that different. had some pretty good points but this rigid way of thinking and this outward bias against the person he is analysing make it hard to take any of this seriously. At least he is eloquent
So, you got sidetracked by the misogyny, and skipped a part, cuz I watched the whole thing. I think David may have been kind of joking with A.T. possibly, don't know if I would believe he really believes women are illogical. Anyway, David brought up some good points of what the women had to say, when they complained about A.T. and then said, "How can I answer them? What do I say to that?" As if they brought up some valuable points.
Apparently on his insta and other social
Media pages there are a lot of things about the matrix and all that so I think the writing is on the walls.
So this guy is an actor and not a Therapist? Why are they even doing this??
If you weren't so lgnorant with such a destroyed attention span, and listened to just a few more seconds of Kirk explaining who he is, you would've instantly heard kirk say that he quit being an actor and decided to pursue therapy to help people.. therefore, he is an actual therapist, Not some actor...
@@test1122lol The nice way to reply would have been something like, "As Kirk said earlier, he quit being an actor and became a therapist". But hey, you went back and watched videos before commenting this time, that's great personal growth :) .
@@ExtraordinaryMachine333 Of course, but is sounding nice always the best option? In this case it wouldn't be as memorable as being abrasive, therefore the chance they'll do the same thing again would be higher..
@@test1122lolare you the expert on predicting how people feel? Seems like bad predictions on your end
@@VG-ul5sqthis guy is in the comment section excusing and defending Tate. It’s screwed up.
He has 4 girls and 1 boy on the way but all his baby mommas hate him lol
According to who??
@@test1122lol acording to my recarch
@@SheikhN-bible-syndrome I said according to who... Name the person you got that information from...
Will Dr. KIrk Honda every address the r@pe accusations against him?
Source?
The ads on your videos are getting out of control! Ad just to watch the video, 3 mins in another ad! Three minutes in!!!!! The other day I clocked a total of 6 ads that you can skip AND the ads you have yourself within the video. This is crazy!
Those ads are from TH-cam. It’s not his fault. Only the ads he does he has control over.
TH-cam inserts more ads in highly sought after/content on popular topics such as the Tate stuff
I didn't get an advert at 3 mins.
They are right if a woman hates you there is a part in her which loves you or at least sexul arousal, the oposite of love is not hate. And Yes scientficaly woman are not stupid but at the avarage they are higher on anxiety scores and mental instability…thus on the avarge they make less racional decissions.
Tate converted to Islam last year.
Yeah we get it, they bad you good, get over yourself lol
Research Andrew tate well then talk about him...
you and your followers are the ones "spouting"
let me say this
Found the angry tater tot
@@epileptictrees5213 proud to be but more like disgusted than angry
@@archonofvoid"proud to be" pathetic
Y'all talking like u aren't trying to be carbon copies of tate
We aren't followers, we can think for ourselves and we do.. let me say that. lol.
Mate...you listen for 2 seconds clup and talk for 20 minutes 😂wtf kind of therapist you are???
The kind that knows what his viewers are here for 😊
It’s pronounced critical thinking
He isn’t doing therapy in these videos. He’s doing this to explain the psychological perspective.
Also, I love his yammering. It’s my favourite part
@@Mama_Bear524 And his facial expressions. The ones in this video were hilarious
Mate he's not conducting a therapy session, he's conducting a commentary video.
I knew I hated lori’s dad for more reasons other than that he wasn’t Luke
If the children were conceived as part of treating women like cattle, I doubt AT is a "loving father". In fact, if the mothers are actually part of the case against him, I don't believe they'd allow their children around him? The whole thing is very suspect. Are the kids also in captivity?
They are right if a woman hates you there is a part in her which loves you or at least sexul arousal, the oposite of love is not hate. And Yes scientficaly woman are not stupid but at the avarage they are higher on anxiety scores and mental instability…thus on the avarge they make less racional decissions.