Comparing Palworld Wont Help Game Freak
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- Palworld has taking the gaming world by storm and the first thing some people did was compare it to Pokémon and use it to channel their frustrations with Game Freak not making the Pokémon Game that they want. Outside of issues of A.I art, allegations of stealing designs and past games and more, a lot of conversations are being had between Palworld being the Pokemon Game that everyone asked for. There are also other Games that Do the pokemon formula right like Dragon Quest Monster, Cassette Beast and more
- เกม
If Nintendo ever uses its ninja lawyers on them. I will be for Palworld.
Lets face it, the main thing that people want gamefreak to implement is an actually GOOD open world with graphics according to this gen, Palworld has some breath taking map design and textures that make scarlet violet and legends arceus look like a ps2 game. Palworld proves that people want to catch creatures with an actually functional open world setting. Gamefreak as been SLACKING when we compare the way other switch games look in comparison and the palworld devs are an indie studio. I think thats why people compare them so much, gamefreak is complacent since X and Y and we all know it
That’s why i said outside of performance and graphics, that’s all that’s you can compare. But i see people saying they want base building and surviving i lm pokemon, something ive never seen a pokemon fan ask for. Now the open world yes. But they complacent cause people keep buying it. The formula is old, but sales and events suggest people still like it. They do need to do better and I’m not arguing that at all. But palworld ain’t showing me nothing outside of how the world looks. Cause the pals look out of place if we are being honest. The animations are also basic. It may look like it’s this gen but the animation and gameplay looks like it’s A ps2 game too. Which is why i dont think this lights a fire to gamefreak
while i agree for the most part it is important to note that this is early access, the fact that they have been able to accomplish this much in early access at an entry level which is already graphically superior to AAA franchise games is what people are comparing, and the base building aspect is not something I would personally ask for but it does leave you wonder about re implementing pokemon emerald and ORAS bases with similar systems, i believe there is a lot of potential and new ideas brought forth by the game and i think that pokemon battling is already rgeat as it is it needs no overhaul, what needs to change instead is the world and gameplay aspects in which we as players can enjoy the game. The reason why this is all a point of discussion is cuz literally everyone is unhappy with the directions gamefreak as taken is all @@BluSatire
It’s a loud minority that’s. Upset. Because there is no reason for a game to keep selling just because of loyalty. I agree game freak can work on enhancing and doing things better but the core gameplay loop is still something people enjoy . There are all of these games out here that do the monster capture mechanics but they get no shine. Again I’m not disagreeing with you fully . But this is a game in pc and Xbox being compared to games on a system everyone class old and week. O excuse to gamefreak cause their are plenty of great looking games on switch but it’s still funny
I dont think it is a loud minority when the game is in the top 5 peak players of all time in the steam charts, and thats steam alone not counting game pass and the consoles. It is easy to wash one hands and excuse the switch for its limitations, but take for example a game like breath of the wild which for a console release game looks stunning in comparison to any other current gen pokemon game. Palworld has sold over 3 million copies in the first week, i think that speaks VOLUMES as to what people look for in the genre, and yes you are correct, core combat mechanics need no tuning, but if they are going to continue pushing games out it is only fair that people will compare them to other games of the same genre and demand a higher standard from the biggest seller. As someone who used to love pokemon until gen 5 (gen 6 being the beggining of this downhill path), I really hope that gamefreak sees a game like Palworld and I hope they see the numbers and that it resonates with them instead of getting half assed remake like BDSP or an unfinished unpolished new gen like scarlet and violet is all, pokemon has such potential even in their current hardware and its sad to see my favorite franchise on the bones@@BluSatire
@@Krishausen "Already graphically surperior to most AAA games". My man... this was made in an engine that focuses on that specifically, with free assets... I don't think that was that hard to achieve when you consider that, also it has no visual integrity whatsoever. The world looks off next to the characters and Pals, it's the equivalent of Sonic in Gmod, that's not impressive. Most graphics go beyond just "wooo, pretty~", it also focuses on the entire aesthetic of the game. Stuff like "how would apples look in this world" (you'd be surprised at how important small things like this can be).
Not trying to bootlick triple A games, they have fallen... terribly. This game just isn't anything innovative or impressive. The only thing it does is make something that no game company ever wanted to make, survival pokemon with guns. That's. It.
Being able to grab your Pokémon and use them as weapons and fighting Pokémon yourself is exactly what I want to see
That’s kind of wild i ain’t gon lie.
That’s … dumb lol. Totally ruins the whole “pokemon are your friends, not tools” concept. No, I don’t want to punch an eevee or use a Charizard as a flamethrower to burn a building down. That sounds ridiculous
@@voyager1568 that's your opinion. In my opinion your thoughts are dumb
@@cha0s.198 ok. in my opinion, your thoughts are dumb.
palworld is popular now, but is a flash in the pan that won't have the same staying power as pokemon. if pokemon did what you wanted from the beginning, pokemon would not be the massive franchise it is today.
slaughtering your pals and forcing them into slave labor is only a novelty and that wears off after a while. what you're left with after the initial buzz is the core guts of the game. will you remember the names of pals the way everyone remembers the names of pokemon? doubtful. so there's no staying power.
@@charlesf.7947 It's actually the other way around. Palword became so massively popular because Nintendo refused to listen to their fans. Had Nintendo made amazing Pokemon games in recent years, this Palworld game would be just another bootleg Pokemon game.
i think its just more of people wanting game freak to do better cuz palworld is a very fun game and they had a $10,000 budget and look at the game they made, imagine the things game freak could do if they actually cared and put effort into their games, like imagine a huge open world survival with all the pokemon and the 8 regions.
also got to take into account that pal world did nothing but put existing ideas together using unreal assets so its not that surprising they were able to make this , They essentially just made arc and threw in capturing so its not that impressive to me. Also all 8 regions in one game is not a good idea despite it being something that would be cool . Pokemon has never been about open survival and closest thing to that is Arceus, which just came out so there is a high chance that a follow up is coming
One thing I think Palworld has that Pokemon fans would like is how they have functionality beside battling. Pokemon cartoons and movies always show humans and Pokes living side by side and to some extent we get glimpses of that in the games - but Palworld actually has fun mechanics behind it.
Arceus KINDA did that when you would recruit some to the town but it's not a mechanic - just a quest where you convince some Pokemon to live in your town and they're just there in the background working.
Does Game Freak just lack imagination, are they too cowardly to innovate, or they purposely just putting in minimum resources because they know they can milk their fans for extra profit? I have no desire to play Palworld but man I really hope it gets Nintendo and zealot fans to finally get their head out their ass.
I want the interactions and animations etc. So yeah, Palworld might scare them a bit I hope
I don’t think it will to be honest. I also thing. The animations in palword are all that. Animation in scarlet and violet are actually good . And show how different pokemon act. But the performance isn’t great. But pal world at its core ain’t even the same game so idk if it will scare them cause people still gonna buy pokemon
@@BluSatire Another thing which shouldn't be underestimated is the hype they enjoy. After the hype dies down will palworld still be relevant in 2 years?
@@jointser1008if they keep updating it and adding stuff like the rest of the survival games do then absolutely. Even 10 years from now people will be talking about it and playing it just like they are ARK.
The thing that palworld innovates on is in that the Pals do work for you.
They enable and automate crafting lines and farming. And most importantly, Pals not on your team are the ones that do so, so it is kinda of like a Pokémon box, where you can SEE your creatures do stuff. This is also an improvement on Ark and Rust, games Palworld shares genre with.
That said, I'm not dumb nor too young, I could say Pokémon already did that in the Pokepelago. But it feels different due to the scale and involvement. The Pokepelago was barely more than a menu, a supply line in Palworld must be built by the player, this is a lot more personal imo.
Hey! in pokemon .... you can make soup and sandwich that have no purpose with themmm ! isnt it as amazing as all you can do with them in palworld ! .................. :D
The thing I've always wanted from Pokemon is an MMORPG, but we're never ever getting that, Palworld and TemTem are the closest we will have, hell... Pixelmon/Cobblemon mods for minecraft show how much potential there is for that.
So I don't know about guns and selling body parts to the black market, but an open sandbox (survival optional) mmorpg for the pokeverse would be my dream come true, this is why I loved Pokemon GO pre-quarantine, because we could play with tons of people and start up groups and whatever, it was an amazing experience, mainline games are cool and all but I want something that's more social but still be pokemon, Palworld being Ark-like means we can open up a server and take on challenges as a group, that's already a plus.
What a lot of us want from Pokemon is not what they're already doing, that's exactly the point, we want them to break free from the formula a bit, like they did with Arceus which was super fun, even S/V with all the jankiness was a step in the right direction, but I truly doubt we'll ever see an mmorpg-like game from them.
Another thing that I find interesting is that besides the shiny charm, there's no incentive to "catch em all" even tho that's the slogan, in Palworld ever pal was it's passives and work talents, as well as RNG based passives, you get bonus exp for catching at least 10 of each and you want to know what everything has so you need at last 1 of each to see what works on your base, all those are already better concepts for the whole "catch em all" idea than Pokemon has ever done.
Got you ! Appreciate you for the detail
I was hoping monster rancher had this energy
THANK YOU!!! Someone else said what I've been saying forever! Palworld is not a pokemon clone.
Arceus Catching mechanics and some similar pals designs, the rest is not pokemon exclusive or copied from them
Oh and i forgot the "gyms" objective too is similar to pokemon
Most of the pal designs either take inspiration from several other sources, like Grizbolt and Jormuntide. One is an electrically charged grizzly bear and the other is Jormangandr but cuter. Some of them draw very heavily from Pokémon, like Anubis (which resembles Lucario) and Nox (which resembles Eevee) but they all have something to make them unique in their designs. The hard part with monster designs is that real life animals tend to get used as reference for those models. Anubis and Lucario both have the head of a jackal but the former is far more Egyptian themed. Nox has different coloring and body proportions than Eevee, as well as different behavior and abilities. If art styles could be copyright protected then Pokémon wouldn’t exist because their generation one designs were inspired by Dragon Quest’s art style.
And as for gyms…what gyms? There are various towers throughout the map that are home to a villain that you have to defeat to progress through the story. They aren’t gyms at all but I can see the similarities.
I think Legends Arceus is definitely a better comparison. Basically just feel PLA should head more in this direction. Having a greater variety of Pokemon acting and working wothin the world in similar ways would be cool. But basically its PLA meets Ark. Love both of those games, and this is a fun mix of both.
Social Media and a lack of gaming experience and knowledge are the only reason this conversation is happening. The TRUE Pokémon clone is TemTem. But they don’t even know what that is.
This is Ark with capturing elements. This is Rust with animal-esque companions. This is a SURVIVAL GAME. In Pokémon your character is also 10-12 years old at MOST. AND we are literally eating these things. Of COURSE the edgy groups want to make smoked Charmander tails but that’s not Pokémon and I don’t want or need it to be. Why would a 10 year old looking to be the greatest trainer be building a house and carrying an assault rifle?
Great video. If you want survival elements in Pokemon then you don’t want Pokemon….this is not a threat to the series or franchise.
Truth!
I would definetly not put Palworld battles in the same scope as quick battles. It just feels to different from quick battles
The pals function the same as autobattle , but with the incorporation of your player it is different . You don’t really have any control of what they do they auto battle but the difference is you can fight too . Thats the only real difference
@@BluSatire you can command your Pals. There are options to do that. Plus auto battles in pokemon are turn based
@@Sweaty_Okuthe autobattle isn’t turn based in talking about the battles when you walk in the world and send your pokemon out and they fight the monster without you having to go into a turn based battle. And i agree palworld battles have more , but it’s mostly them
Fighting on their own unless you decide to pick them up use as a weapon or use it’s ability
Bonding with the Pals and having them actually interact with the open world and truly live inside it is what lots of us wanted from Pokémon. I remember as a kid, kind of hoping each next gen would be closer to the world of the anime, which we haven't received, with the last gen in particular being a new low. Hell, I didn't even buy it, someone else bought it for me as a surprise gift, personally I wasn't too sold on how lazy it seemed and if they continue selling games like that, I won't be buying. But Palworld's success might lead to Pokémon putting in more effort as long term, if they keep doing bad games, it'll be bad for them. Obviously nobody's asking for the type of violence or themes Palworld has to be involved
What pokemon can have from Palworld:
-Usefullnes of Pokemons, when you capture a pokemon, MAYBE (if isn't a nuzlock) you are going to let that pokemon on the box FOR THE REST OF THE FUCKING GAME, why do that? you could do so much more with that, on max you gona use 20 pokemons the hole game, and have captured more than 80 sometimes even more, and this 60 will just go to PC and never see again, why don't you make a mechanic where they are usefull, we already see on anime or series, that pokemons are use for labor, why don't try to put this on pokemon (to make potions or itens from things that drop from them, or items to equip on other pokemons)
-A good open world, you can make a good history and a good open world in one game, Palworld don't have a history yet, only a few letter scattered around the map making some history(they will probably improve that with updates), pokemon could make a good history with a open world but they diceded to not do it
this are 2 things that i didn't even think that much to talk about, and would help pokemon become better
sword and shield already did the first thing
I'm a massive Pokémon and Lucario fan, but hot damn, Palworld is incredible even in early access. I will be playing Palworld for a *very* long time, I look forward to its updates!
*P.S. Inubis > Lucario*
what i want from a pokemon game ?
graphics, animations, framerate, innovations...
say what you want, an indie studio made something bigger, better looking and more refreshing than a billion $ company.
scarlet violet is a freaking buggy mess with garbage framerates, memory leaks, flickering polygons, there is no house to get into, 3 fps characters when you're 5 meters from them.. the world is plain boring, Arceus looked bad, but at least it was new and was playing great as a whole. Nintendo/pokemoncompany have enough money and resources to give game freak a bit of help but they dont. Need one game per year, whatever it looks like.. and i'm done with that. How am I supposed to want to play a new pokemon game that will look like scarlet violet.. again.. when I just experienced something just way more refreshing that runs at more than 10 fps.. i'm done with pokemon..
I feel that.
You're probably right but I don't think so for the same reason. The games aren't really similar but most pokemon fans today aren't really there for the games anymore, they're there for the animal collecting. You can see that in legends, with online battles gone and the game still being succeesful. It's for that reason I think this game could provide gamefreak some good competition if it weren't for the fact that they could out-compete gamefreak's games by a landslide and still not even affect them in the slightest because gamefreak makes over 3 times what it makes on the games in merchandise(~30bil on games ~100bil on merch), and the rushed release shedule exists as a method to pump out new pokemon designs to fuel said merchandise. People were onto something but it ain't enough to phase the largest MEDIA (not videogame) franchise.
I'd love to play this, if only it was available on the switch
The thing I want Gamefreak to take note of is how integrated the creatures are into the gameplay. Nearly all of the larger creatures are mounts and you can use the moves they know while you're riding them. Pals are more than just tools for combat so you actually have a reason to care about more than just your party of 5-6. In pokemon, you really don't have a reason to care about the majority of the pokedex. If you run into a pokemon you like but doesn't really fit in the party, its just going to sit in the PC and you're never going to see it again, but in palworld that pal would still be usable in your base where theyll be a benefit to you. Pokémon tried making the pokemon in your box useful with the poke pelago but it was so shallow and non-interactive than nobody gave a shit that it was included.
I am a poke mon fan too but i absolutely love palworld and what you said was pretty much spot on. But if i may add my two cents, I believe what really has the pokemon fans up in arms is the fact that despite how nice scarlet and violet are mechanically,(terastilize i absolutely love) the games themselves run like dog water on the switch. Especiall considering TOTK runs pretty solid 30fps and only drops when the players makes a crazy build that drops the fps. Palworld, in early access, despite server crashes and bugs, the game runs flawlessly with little to no performance issues on the client side. Also Palworld seems to be what I like to call "lore accurate pokemon." If people read the manga or even half the dex entries, everyone will know the world of pokemon is actually very messed up if not worse than palworld. However the games being targetted for kids is why they have them watered down. True pokemon has guns, enslavement, animal abuse, death and tragedy. The games since theyre being targetted towards kids, I believe its holding the games back because the one who really are playing pokemon anymore are the ones who grew up with it aka us adults and some teens whove been introduced to it by their parents. kids these days are playing Fortnite, GTA, COD, and honestly the more adult like games, are the ones kids are playing. Now i dont speak for everyone but that seems to be the path of the majority. I feel if game freak wants to make a banger of a game they need to actually stand by their lore, and make sure the game doesnt run like dog water.
I agreee with most of what you said , but lets remember it’s in early access but it’s a pc game using unreal 5 assets for its world . It’s going to run better than most switch games . And Pokemon will continue to sell. Nobody really read the manga but you right it’s different Pokédex entires are wild. But their main target is children. The main problem is the fanbase that grew up with it want the game to grow with it but the company wants to keep the new players coming .
@@BluSatire Yeah absolutely. maybe with the new switch console running Nvidias DLSS, the games will run better when new pokemon titles release but yeah i do agree palworld probably runs better because of unreal engine 5 and most peoples PCs probably have the specs to run it at 60fps at least. So as for pokemon, GameFreak might be at an impasse. They want to innovate the games but trying to get a new generation into their franchise is IMO keeping them from doing that. I just wish Game freak could see who their Audience really is VS what theyre trying to target. Kids these days seem to have the hyper active attention span. from my personal experience. id bring my switch over to a friends house and their kids would watch me play pokemon and id show them what it is and how its played. They mustve watched me for at least 5 minutes before they moved on to playing cod in their room again. Leading me to believe this new generation is more into real time combat than turn based. Not that theres anything wrong with that. I love both, but times are changing and kids into different things now than we were.
You want to know what I want from Palworld that I would like to see in Pokémon that it currently isn't doing?
Make an actual high quality game that has had a great deal of time spent developing it.
Pal World aint as high quality as folks making it, but you right.
The Pals look like Pokemon, Spheres are Pokeballs to include the different levels (Pokeball, Greatball, Ultraball, Masterball), Battling Gym leader styled bosses. I like Palworld but it baffles me that people pretend its not Pokemon driven. Palworld is definitely the example of what game Pokemon should have made but they were too slow.
Totally agree it's not just a legends Arceus clone. They definitely incorporated a lot of concepts from games like ARK that are no where in the pokemon franchise
But the ideas they took from legends Arceus are implementing so much better in palworld IMO. Catching pals feels way more fun and fluid. Boss battles are way more challenging and interesting. The world is way more interesting and prettier. The graphics actually look like they came from this century. The mounts are way cooler. And I've only played like 15 hours of the game lol
Is Legends Arceus 3 years old already!?
idk if i said wrong date, but it and scarlet and violet came out in 2022
Pal world has great story, you have to read the journal entry
"Do you want more survival and building in your Pokemon games?" I'll be totally honest: yes. My dream Pokemon game is an actual Pokemon game, with all the elements of the usual formula, thoughtfully designed creatures, the collectibility aspect, the turn-based RPG system, a handcrafted world rich with NPCs and trainer battles, good story and worldbuilding -- ideally as good as in Scarlet/Violet, not Pokemon's usual high-end-of-mediocre standard of storytelling and worldbuilding -- but _also_ a focus on open exploration and environmental puzzle-solving, a crafting system, and, absolute best case scenario, perhaps an environmental building system in an infinite procedurally generated world, such as in Minecraft, lining the outskirts of the handcrafted world. So basically Pixelmon or Cobblemon but if they could iron out all the rough edges and had a handcrafted world with story and worldbuilding. Equivalently, basically Legends Arceus if it had environmental puzzle-solving and an environmental building system in an infinite procedurally generated world. That being said, Palworld doesn't look like it delivers _well_ on _any_ of these points, and even if it did, I really have no interest in a literal "haha funny animal abuse" game made by NFT-peddling art thieves.
My exact thoughts. I feel like the people who like this game are the people who have only played pokemon and nothing else, seeing that the game is declining in quality and then seeing this (which is definitely better, but not... quality).
I think the people that like this game haven’t really played many Pokemon games cause this plays nothing. Like one. It’s alot of pc and Xbox only folks too . But i get what you saying some pokemon fans probably never played a survival game. But that’s just not the Pokémon formula
I don't see it as a question of what was done first. Yes, Arceus had throwing pokeballs outside of battle, but guess what, Scarlet removed it. What good is it to say what Arceus did first when the game after removed the feature entirely? The world is also more alive in Palworld. I can't tell you how many times I've casually stumbled across a territorial battle between two creatures, or the Syndicate(the main antagonist of the games story) actively attacking the creatures and finding a captured one in a cage. And that's within the overworld, not relegated to a cutscene then glossed over/forgotten about for a couple hours. It would be nice if both Palworld and Pokemon expand upon this further. Not just stumbling upon battles, but seeing the creatures do other things as you pass by.
Well Arceus and scarlet and violet were being made at the same time. sV was a made traditional with mechanics just in case people didn’t like Arceus. I wasn’t really trying to say “Arceus did it first” i was saying if you are trying to compare that is own thing you can compare to. But these are two different kinds of games is my point and what pal world does more than likely won’t change what gamefreak does with “Mainline” games.
Palworld take Pokemon parodistically, but naming it "Pokemon with guns" was incorrect, because is more "Ark with Pokemon in the breath of the Elder wild".
Using different known ascpects of different famous games and meshing them together with a lot of nice animations in a colorfull and lifefull environment, for me, it's not lack of fantasy, but genius!
Palworld will never be competition. You cannot make an apple into an orange. The problem is the reality of being on top. Who can compete with you to when everyone else stopped trying. Remember Yokai Watch? Yeah, it tried, not many of us bought into it within the states, and they heavily advertised that here, no success. How about Tem-Tem? We didn't buy it, it has problems.
Its something about reality that people need to realize. If you want pokemon to improve, sure you can throw your feedback at GF and hope something gets through, but some company stepping up and doing one better will be much more effective than anything else.
Yes, the gameplay is completely different but the design is so like Pokemon...but it is what it is. If the game is fun to play..Idgaf!
Perfect title 10/10
Honestly, scared or not it won't stop Nintendo from trying to find a way to sue for copyright or IP infringement even though they have no leg to stand on
Nintendo isn’t the one trying to sue. It would be the Pokémon company. And once you put mods behind a paywall you can get that cease and desist.
@@BluSatire What's this about mods?
@@JohnnyYeTaecanUktenathey tried to make a mod that substituted the Pal for actual Pokémon and it got taken down
@@Sir_Sensei Ok well that is different from the game itself being taken down from copyright infringement. And honestly a Modder would have gotten away with the mod if they did not try to paywall it, as something like that happened for a different game as well and the modder's mod got taken down due to it being paywalled as in a breach of copyright
Like you can have donation links and all for those that like your stuff sure but you can not just pay wall the mod for a copy protected thing. As then it crosses from grey to illegal as violating copyright or IP laws
A few things were incorrect...in palworld you throw out your pal and the entire battle is done by the pal, unless you mount the pal and then choose its moves. This gives you the fluidity of using weapons or other strategies to defeat said enemy...something pokemon has never and will never do. In pokemon, every battle is done by you picking the move your pokemon will use. Feel free to correct me if im wrong though. Also the idea of mounting your pals and flying or running to absolutely wherever you want on the map instead of having to "use fly", then a black screen shows up and you're suddenly at the location, was another thing for me. legend of arceus and games before/after that were practically open world and you still had to "use fly" if you wanted to travel to a different "city". I could go on with the things pokemon didnt do, that palworld did. those are the references and differences people talk about.
There is an option in scarlet and violet where you don’t have to battle , you throw your pokemon out and they do it for you and they drop material. Pal world is the same but with more options and more visuals. that’s what i meant about quick battling. It’s called auto battle Scarlet and Violet fly is an option . You don’t have to fly to get to every city and in the dlc they added the actual option to fly. I do get what you saying but that is also why i said they aren’t the same game.
@@BluSatire I suppose i didn't play when those added features were put there
Fair enough 🤌🏽
The people upset about this are giving real gamers a bad look. Get a life, guys.
There are some things that are questionable. Me personally I’m not upset , i was just pointing out some opinions
@@BluSatire muckraking then
Graphics from the last decade
Your insight and grand view of other "Pokemon clones" or pokemon-likes really put into perspective to me that I shouldn't bother with Palworld, cause ultimately it will be a fad.
Couple that in with the whole ... Company integrity thing that they got going on with their company... Big yikes, y'know?
Thanks for the video Blu! Fingers crossed that people playing palworld can identify an answer for your question. Cause it's low-key a packed one
Right the more i look at it the more im like i can’t even play this anymore. And it shows how much people hate a company they they are willing to overlook any shady stuff because fun
3:18
Pokémon as a slave and run factory for me.
I wouldn’t say I ever really wanted base building or guns from Pokemon (but I do like Palworld a lot) BUT an open 3D world with live combat instead of turn based where the creatures actually visually use their moves instead of “shake and do a particle effect”, is what I always wanted from a pokemon game.
The generic turn based combat in pokemon I get is a staple of the game but it’s so fucking dull. Fighting WITH my creature and that’s what I’d want in pokemon or, at least, be able to control the pokemon the way to can in Palworld when mounted on them. So I’d disagree Palworld doesn’t do things we want in games there are aspects there that pokemon doesn’t give and no I won’t buy pokemon anyways. I haven’t bought a pokemon game for the last several games just because they’re always so lackluster.
gamefreak just jealous they cant put guns in their E for everyone pokemon games
Gamefreak does not care about this game lol
My take on it, is I haven't owned a console since the PS1, never been interested personally.
I've always used PC and I found that throughout the years, Nintendo just haven't catered to me who find themselves on a different platform.
So yeah, even though I find myself at 30 years old, this is genuinely my first experience into the game.
I would suggest that Nintendo reach out to different platforms, there's a perfectly good audience out there.
Nintendo has survived this long because its in its own lane. Nintendo going multiplatform wouldn’t be good for them as a company.
I will say that letting you use your pals to do busy work feels like cool idea.... Not sure how well you could do that with Pokemon.
It reminds me of the Arceus movie where in the past Pokemon were used as slave labor and called magical creatures
Dude, when you started showing clips of the Craftopia game, I won't lie. That was a jaw dropper with how much stiff they ripped off. They really just recolored some of the enemy designs from botw/totk and called it a day. My God. They even ripoff elements from Fortnite.
This is a combination of ripoff after ripoff.
They're so shameless with this too.
It’s so shameless ! Appreciate you for watching and giving insight
The issue with Palworld is not that it's ripping off pokemon, rather that than ripping off small creatives. The issue is the method: its blatant and unapologetic use of generative AI to rip off pokemon designs is exactly what we have talked about when we have criticized generative AI, because it can't generate out of nothing. As for "there's no evidence"-argument, the lead designer of the game is heavily into AI and Crypto cultures, not to mention other third party attempts to recreate palworld creatures by using AI to rip off Pokemon have been very successful. It shouldn't need to be pointed out for how obvious it is, but there. If we stand up against generative AI when it's used to rip off creatives without support networks, we must stand up against it when it's used to rip off the pokemon company. Allowing it here would be giving content thieves a free pass and that must not happen.
Fuck generative AI, fuck art thieves and fuck Palworld.
Steam has said there is no AI in the game and the pal designs were created before AI was available,
well on top of it being more like ark or conan exiles, The monsters only have 2 battle stats. Attack, and defense. Meaning the Pals found in the end game are by default, the strongest. The battle system definitely isnt as good as pokemon. This battle system isnt gonna challenge pokemon in any way.
oh also, even palworld has some breath of the wild influences lol
I love palworld and i also like pokemon but i want better for pokemon and palworld will not change them. There is a little bit of story in palworld some talks of gen spliceing pals to make new ones but thats about it, i do hope palworld builds on there story and world building.
I’m sure Palworld is fun but I feel like people expect too much from Game Freak nowadays. It is true that they have done better in the past and need more development time but I feel Palworld fans are blowing out of proportion just because of over expectations.
I agree
Ark with Pokémon
Yep what i said in video
Thankyou
Cant wait for Palworld GO lmao
I feel like these kinds of arguments miss the point a bit. I personally encourage the comparison because Pokemon is very complacent right now, and that’s undeniable. Palworld might be a mostly different game, but at the end of the day it’s a game that looks like Pokemon and is clearly taking advantage of that Pokemon itch we’ve all developed, and that’s not a good look for a franchise that has thus far coasted off of being the only ones you could go to for that itch. *That’s* the part I think people are hoping will put the battery in TPC’s back.
Sure, they’ll sell whether or not they up the quality, but they’re not immune from nonetheless becoming irrelevant if they continue phoning in project after project - that’s the thing that makes Palworld an embarrassing moment for them. Just Dance sells well every time but no critic is raving over Just Dance, and no programmer is dying to work on Just Dance. And Scarlet & Violet did well because “Pokemon’s open world for the first time” was a phrase that a monkey could sell, even being as only-somewhat-true as it was. But now that there’s already been an open-world Pokemon, the next one is by no means guaranteed to sell better or even close to as well.
Palworld isn’t a blueprint they need to follow, but it does show they need to go back to the drawing board some type of way. Pokemon isn’t guaranteed to stay untouchable & one-of-one. As much money as it already makes, the franchise is leaving a LOT of money on the table twiddling its thumbs that other companies are finally ready to step up and gladly take, and they do have to avoid shareholders & investors peeping that and latching onto that narrative.
Left a like, solid discussion video my boy 🙏🏿
They haven’t been the only game you can go for for that itch, i named 5 other games just like pokemon in the video. I agree this game is def taking advantage of looking like pokemon , but when you actually play it it isn’t at all. It’s a completely different genre. Pokemon has evolved its games very slowly but people enjoy the core gameplay which is why they haven’t changed. Pokémon is also more than just a video game . Trading cards anime plush merchandise , it’s the number 1 franchise in the world . The games are just a part of their success which is why i think this does nothing to really hurt them. They may use it to try something new. But truth be told this game if you want to compare it , is just Arceus with base building so Pokemon has started to try already . But I’m not saying your wrong in anyway i just don’t see it hurting them! Appreciate you for the insight
@@BluSatireGood point about the other aspects of the franchise. I definitely think anyone calling this a “Pokemon killer” is dragging it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if we see them get it in gear for generation 10 following the response to Palworld. Or maybe that’s me on pure hopium lmao I don’t love Palworld but I would LOVE a better Pokemon experience!
You can say that, but nothing lasts forever & one of the worst things a successful company can do, is rest on it's laurels. It's the same type of mentality, that saw Netflix put Blockbuster out of business & facebook turning myspace into a relic of the past. Palworld has the chance to become the next generation, of monster taming games. @@BluSatire
Palworld does a better job of making the world and monsters feel more immersive. What game has gamefreak made where you can use pokemon to do more than battling, riding, or HMs? Can you have them help you build a house? How about light a fire with fire pokemon. Can you power a generator with electric attacks. Gamefreak can do so much more with the franchise but choose to play it safe because they can. That's why im glad a game like this exists because it gives a glimpse of how things can be but knowing gamefreak will never happen.
When had Pokémon been a game about building a house? Power generators. This has never been asked of Pokemon . These are two different games . PAL world is an Ark clone that threw monsters in it . I get what you saying but this is a whole different genre of game then Pokemon, it’s far fetched to think that this will make gamefreak move to this for “Mainline” games. I can see it in a spinoff.
thanks my boy
It's crazy I just downloaded this game 3 days ago and damn me and my wife are addicted to it haha😂😂 Gotta Catch Em All.....😮
People must not know about nexomon and temtem 😂
I don’t think they do lol. It’s so many games in this genre
Great video Blu!! ❤
I appreciate you fam !
Good video. Definitely would love to see more from you. ❤
Appreciate you! always down to know what topics you would like to see too
No way. Pal world design is uninspiring. I watched my brother play.
I wouldn't be surprised if this game is an ai created game I mean from what Ive seen and heard they have combined Pokemon with Day z , Rust, Ark, Fortnite, and other popular games. it way to similar to many games but just slightly different by using mechanics from said other games. it seems like an all around knock off of multiple games.
Base building
Nah sword and shield was trash
What made it trash ?
@@BluSatire the story was horrible, the fight animations and sprites where the same as in the 3ds, decades and no voice actors, graphics where cheap, I can go on.
@@z3r0foxgibben11the story was cheeks, but graphics wasn’t as bad as folks make it, folks complained about trees. Reuse assets don’t make a game trash but it does make them lazy . The no voice acting doesn’t make a game trash either. But again something i understand wanting . The games were decent . They weren’t great. And it’s hard to call something that’s is still enjoyable with flaws just utter trash. But that’s just me.
I don't like Palworld for many reasons but I do understand their success is a wake up call for Game Freak to innovate their game and stop making the same recipe in milking their player base. I "WAS" a fan of Pokemon up until Gen IV and quit, most people I knew also quit at the same time or at Gen III and most have a common reason: "It''s not fun anymore..". I did play again but it was a fan made Pokemon MMO where it was locked at Gen III ( because for a lot of people, Gen III was the last true Pokemon game ever made ), it got lots of player base and caught the attention of Game Freaks and got shut down for copyright. One thing both Pokemon clones did that Game Freaks failed to offer, "A game TO PLAY with your FRIENDS with NEW FUN THINGS to do." Let's be real, most people continued playing Pokemon because of their emotional attachment to the game when it was first released and not because it's fun.
1st