Thanks for pointing out some of the safety considerations, great no-nonsense presentation. I like the emphasis on keeping the work area free of obstructions, and on the risk of energizing the lower tool circuit hose for the tamp. A couple of things I would add, mostly around what happened with the aerial device (bucket truck). Remember, it's very possible the aerial device could become energized, not just the digger derrick, thus energizing both units (for instance through a shared ground or close proximity). The guy in the bucket truck is misusing the line coverup equipment (hose). Chance/Hubbell specifically prohibits that type of deliberate mechanical contact with their line hose. It is only for "incidental brush contact". What is depicted is a common field practice, but it could actually put the platform occupant at more risk as they have a false sense of security as they misuse the insulating protective equipment. Most aerial device manufacturers will not allow platform lips to be used to lift conductors. The unknown span weight could exceed the platform capacity of the unit. There are known incidents where this was the case. Wrapping the winch rope around the line hose is also a no-no. Again, violates the mfgr prohibitions for the line hose. Also, the winch rope is not an insulator. Neither is the jib mast itself (unless it is rated and tested for the voltage involved). ANSI A92.2 directs the use of an insulating device to prevent energizing the jib and boom tip when handling energized conductors with the material handling jib. For an added layer of protection, use a tool hose whip made of non-conductive hydraulic hose, leading to the pole tamp. One additional way to protect the ground guy, should the truck become energized.
Here's the reason: At some point in the future, that pole will need to be pulled out of the ground to be replaced. How badly would you want to remove a 40' pole that's been embedded in concrete 6' below ground? Fencing is a much different situation.
Wood shrinks over time. This creates a gap between the wood and concrete that collects water and rots wood. Concrete is only good fill around concrete or steel poles.
![[ TEASER ] เงาะป่า - วงL.กฮ. | TMG RECORD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M4ObdFfcPww/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for pointing out some of the safety considerations, great no-nonsense presentation. I like the emphasis on keeping the work area free of obstructions, and on the risk of energizing the lower tool circuit hose for the tamp. A couple of things I would add, mostly around what happened with the aerial device (bucket truck). Remember, it's very possible the aerial device could become energized, not just the digger derrick, thus energizing both units (for instance through a shared ground or close proximity). The guy in the bucket truck is misusing the line coverup equipment (hose). Chance/Hubbell specifically prohibits that type of deliberate mechanical contact with their line hose. It is only for "incidental brush contact". What is depicted is a common field practice, but it could actually put the platform occupant at more risk as they have a false sense of security as they misuse the insulating protective equipment. Most aerial device manufacturers will not allow platform lips to be used to lift conductors. The unknown span weight could exceed the platform capacity of the unit. There are known incidents where this was the case. Wrapping the winch rope around the line hose is also a no-no. Again, violates the mfgr prohibitions for the line hose. Also, the winch rope is not an insulator. Neither is the jib mast itself (unless it is rated and tested for the voltage involved). ANSI A92.2 directs the use of an insulating device to prevent energizing the jib and boom tip when handling energized conductors with the material handling jib. For an added layer of protection, use a tool hose whip made of non-conductive hydraulic hose, leading to the pole tamp. One additional way to protect the ground guy, should the truck become energized.
What's the inverval distance between each pole?
Why do a lot of people put concrete in the hole when setting posts, but not when setting telephone poles?
They making a below ground anchor.
You don't need much anchor to a residential service line.
They need adjustment & replacement easy
Here's the reason: At some point in the future, that pole will need to be pulled out of the ground to be replaced. How badly would you want to remove a 40' pole that's been embedded in concrete 6' below ground? Fencing is a much different situation.
Wood shrinks over time. This creates a gap between the wood and concrete that collects water and rots wood. Concrete is only good fill around concrete or steel poles.
These guys demand utmost respect.
Do you guys ever have to barricade the trucks?
We do when we're barehanding transmission and pulling conductor.
As he preaches safety, he stands under a suspended pole! Genius...
Being there, he wasn't under the pole, but at that angle it sure looks like he is. Good point though, thanks for watching!
Never use 2nd stage of truck while setting pole until 3rd is completely ran out.
Why
@@MonsieurDeeThe 3rd stage is fibre glass and the boom lifts more with the 3rd out and 2nd in compared to the reverse.