Shame on you, Textron, for not being able to making any visible contribution to an existing successful aircraft! Just copying the PC-12 except for a new engine and some minor details.
@@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 Clean-sheet just as the Aviat Husky. Which accidentally has the same length - to the inch - as the Super Cub - with tail, body and undercarriage indistinguishible from the latter. Differences in wingspan and wing area in the decimals. Pardon my skeptiscism regarding the Denali.
When you design an aircraft for a specific mission or flight envelope around a specific engine or power plant, PHYSICS, not the engineers, determines the look. I'm a physicist and aerospace engineer with a specialty in aerodynamics and computational fluid dynamics. An aircraft has to be a certain size and shape to carry a given payload within a certain speed envelope while achieving a specified efficiency with the powerplant the airframe is designed around. Very specific airfoil shapes will deliver the required performance. You start with the "mission" or target payload and then the speed and attitude desired. Choose an engine that can deliver that altitude and speed given its performance envelope and then design the aircraft around the engine with wings and control surfaces that are optimized for altitude and speed desired while offering the best stability at the slow portions of flight. So, it's physics, not an artist who is in control. The only design choice they could have made to look different is to have pursued a high-wing design.
YES, what a Beautiful Airplane this is and 2 me looking a lot Better than the TBM and the Pilatus 12 NG !! ❤❤😅😅
Nice catch
Thank you!
I want to see the truck take off
Tiene algo parecido al PC-12 Pilatus , la diferencia que este 220 no es Turbo HELICE .
Beechcraft の・・・PC12・・・だよね😁？
right!
Yes, it is.
*FADEC Controlled*
*Then Copied by Pilatus*
Pilatus PC 12 & TBM are better
Shame on you, Textron, for not being able to making any visible contribution to an existing successful aircraft! Just copying the PC-12 except for a new engine and some minor details.
Gamin autoland??
*Denali is a Clean-Sheet Design*
- Genius
@@Ford_Raptor_R_720hp_V8 Clean-sheet just as the Aviat Husky. Which accidentally has the same length - to the inch - as the Super Cub - with tail, body and undercarriage indistinguishible from the latter. Differences in wingspan and wing area in the decimals. Pardon my skeptiscism regarding the Denali.
When you design an aircraft for a specific mission or flight envelope around a specific engine or power plant, PHYSICS, not the engineers, determines the look. I'm a physicist and aerospace engineer with a specialty in aerodynamics and computational fluid dynamics. An aircraft has to be a certain size and shape to carry a given payload within a certain speed envelope while achieving a specified efficiency with the powerplant the airframe is designed around. Very specific airfoil shapes will deliver the required performance. You start with the "mission" or target payload and then the speed and attitude desired. Choose an engine that can deliver that altitude and speed given its performance envelope and then design the aircraft around the engine with wings and control surfaces that are optimized for altitude and speed desired while offering the best stability at the slow portions of flight. So, it's physics, not an artist who is in control. The only design choice they could have made to look different is to have pursued a high-wing design.