Great info. I have found some success doing a slightly different method. I use a similar point system, but I do 2-4-5 instead of 2-3-4. With the same caveats for low pairs and the 4 to a straight or flush. I'll also play a 3 point hand if it is 3 to a straight if they are connected, 6 7 8 or 8 9 10, for example. I know I give up a few % by playing 1 point tighter. But I do it to try to make my bankroll last a bit longer by folding the marginal hands.
Played your game online. Purposely folded hands; sequentially hands showed were winning in desending order from four of a kind. Is it designed to stop you from folding good hands?
Wouldn't counting the remaining cards left in the deck (number of "outs" left to improve your hand to push or win) give you a % to win? Example: At the 9:48 minute mark of the video, you have 8 cards (aka outs) that will give you a win, two 5's, 3 kings, and three 4's. There are 4 cards showing with 48 cards left in the deck. 8 "outs" divided by 48 is a 16.7% chance of not losing. This is a terrible game. Losing in the long run, guaranteed .
These videos are fantastic, your best format for a tutorial so far. Keep them coming!
Best format? Mostly agree, save for the Pretty Girl of course. :)
The info you offer is fine, but I've never seen Mississippi Stud that does not include the bonus chip
Great info. I have found some success doing a slightly different method. I use a similar point system, but I do 2-4-5 instead of 2-3-4. With the same caveats for low pairs and the 4 to a straight or flush. I'll also play a 3 point hand if it is 3 to a straight if they are connected, 6 7 8 or 8 9 10, for example.
I know I give up a few % by playing 1 point tighter. But I do it to try to make my bankroll last a bit longer by folding the marginal hands.
😊
super helpful tutorial
Love the point system -- VERY helpful -- thanks
Would anyone care to explain the unsuited 4-6-7, 5-7-8 inside straight exception to me? Does A-3-4 or 2, 4, 5 unsuited apply to this as well?
Fantastic.
What happens if the player have two small pairs? Win or not like two pairs
Played your game online. Purposely folded hands; sequentially hands showed were winning in desending order from four of a kind. Is it designed to stop you from folding good hands?
Does this point counting system still work with the automatic shufflers some casinos use for poker games?
thanks Mike
Hello, just curious. How much do you recommend I have to have for a $10 minimum table?
Is there a list of what games you have these trainers available for?
Full list: wizardofodds.com/play/
ace-low 4 to an inside straight is a raise 1x
Wouldn't counting the remaining cards left in the deck (number of "outs" left to improve your hand to push or win) give you a % to win? Example: At the 9:48 minute mark of the video, you have 8 cards (aka outs) that will give you a win, two 5's, 3 kings, and three 4's. There are 4 cards showing with 48 cards left in the deck. 8 "outs" divided by 48 is a 16.7% chance of not losing. This is a terrible game. Losing in the long run, guaranteed .