If placebo had an effect on sypmtoms but not on the underlying cause, I wonder what exactly patients assumed the placebo would do. the first thing that comes to mind is that they assumed precisely that: that it would be the symptoms that wouuld disappear.
Placebo is the term of self imun in different "material" which not explainable yet but in right dose can change the situation in the real way but unexplainable yet by sains.
I disagree with you that positivity and happiness are going to give a placebo effect. I think it is that if the person BELIEVES that whatever they take or do is going to address the underlying problem is going to have an effect. As for placebo for cancer you are right and in fact the medical profession proved this 100% even thought they won't admit it today. In the first 60 years of chemotherapy drugs they were using drugs that targeted rapidly dividing cells. And then by 2005 or so they admitted / found that there are no rapidly dividing cells in cancer. Now they are claiming that cancer cells grow slower than normal cells. So they have kept the story of abnormal cells dividing out of control. Certainly they knocked over about 44%, probably as many died of the treatment as died in the second world war, but the 56%, those who were able to tolerate the deadly poison, had tumors shrink and in some cases go away. That is a placebo effect because there was NO pharmacological effects of the drugs on the cancer cells. The only pharmacological effects were the side effects..
@@Kyrani99 "Now they are claiming that cancer cells grow slower than normal cells" Perhaps you are mistaking them talking about different kinds of cancers? There are fast growing ones, and ones that grow very slowly.
@@C4rnee Cancer cells, like other cells, can grow faster if there is a need. For normal cells this may happen during tissue repair or tissue regeneration. For cancer cells it is always how the person is reacting. The SMT has no credible evidence. They are using genetically engineered mice and cell cultures to get the results that they want. In a solid cancer, which is the 97% of cancers, they see the characteristics of an organ It has a micro environment with other connective tissue cells and immune system cells resident. It also has cancer stem cells. Basically a novel organ is being generated. I found that there is underhanded foul game play behind disease and cancer is one of the most striking examples. If the person is reacting a lot, especially if they have been angered over time and fighting more aggressively, then the cancer will be fast growing. It is not a matter of type.
@@C4rnee The story about abnormal cells dividing out of control, whether fast or slow has NO scientific evidence to back it up. They have generated genetically engineered mice and cell culture to create the evidence that they want for the Somatic Mutation Theory. They saw cancers regress and even go away with placebo back in the first 50 years of chemotherapy. Why? Because the chemo was nothing other than a placebo, but rather than a sugar pill, it was very nasty medicine. Worked the same.
Actually not! These same team did a research about placebo effect in people that knew they were receiving a sham treatment. They had better outcomes than the control group.
If placebo had an effect on sypmtoms but not on the underlying cause, I wonder what exactly patients assumed the placebo would do. the first thing that comes to mind is that they assumed precisely that: that it would be the symptoms that wouuld disappear.
Placebo is the term of self imun in different "material" which not explainable yet but in right dose can change the situation in the real way but unexplainable yet by sains.
Ive heard many people shrink tumor though from placebo induicing mindset i.e positivity happiness etc
I disagree with you that positivity and happiness are going to give a placebo effect. I think it is that if the person BELIEVES that whatever they take or do is going to address the underlying problem is going to have an effect.
As for placebo for cancer you are right and in fact the medical profession proved this 100% even thought they won't admit it today. In the first 60 years of chemotherapy drugs they were using drugs that targeted rapidly dividing cells. And then by 2005 or so they admitted / found that there are no rapidly dividing cells in cancer.
Now they are claiming that cancer cells grow slower than normal cells. So they have kept the story of abnormal cells dividing out of control.
Certainly they knocked over about 44%, probably as many died of the treatment as died in the second world war, but the 56%, those who were able to tolerate the deadly poison, had tumors shrink and in some cases go away. That is a placebo effect because there was NO pharmacological effects of the drugs on the cancer cells. The only pharmacological effects were the side effects..
@@Kyrani99
"Now they are claiming that cancer cells grow slower than normal cells"
Perhaps you are mistaking them talking about different kinds of cancers? There are fast growing ones, and ones that grow very slowly.
@@C4rnee Cancer cells, like other cells, can grow faster if there is a need. For normal cells this may happen during tissue repair or tissue regeneration. For cancer cells it is always how the person is reacting. The SMT has no credible evidence. They are using genetically engineered mice and cell cultures to get the results that they want. In a solid cancer, which is the 97% of cancers, they see the characteristics of an organ It has a micro environment with other connective tissue cells and immune system cells resident. It also has cancer stem cells. Basically a novel organ is being generated.
I found that there is underhanded foul game play behind disease and cancer is one of the most striking examples. If the person is reacting a lot, especially if they have been angered over time and fighting more aggressively, then the cancer will be fast growing. It is not a matter of type.
@@C4rnee The story about abnormal cells dividing out of control, whether fast or slow has NO scientific evidence to back it up. They have generated genetically engineered mice and cell culture to create the evidence that they want for the Somatic Mutation Theory.
They saw cancers regress and even go away with placebo back in the first 50 years of chemotherapy. Why? Because the chemo was nothing other than a placebo, but rather than a sugar pill, it was very nasty medicine. Worked the same.
In a room full of academics, 'The needle went up the shaft' still got a laugh.
So what was his point? He asked if placebos were worth it, but I didn’t hear an answer.
Beautiful❤. Thanks🌹
not to be rude but does he have some kind of phobia he looked pretty panicked up there
Uhh, no. He just seems like any other passionate teacher who has more information to give than he has time.
Faith?
Need to know this info; very, very important. But you gotta cut down on the coffee
😂😂
Are u talking about homeopathy
Hopefully, this video will not be watched by a lot of people, or else the purpose of these findings will be defeated.
Actually not! These same team did a research about placebo effect in people that knew they were receiving a sham treatment. They had better outcomes than the control group.
Everyone has pieces of the puzzle, one day we will realize, we are the creators of our lives
only works when its a belief.
GO Kapt'!! ;)
Leave mythological jesus out this fool.
The jury's still out on that actually.
Blasmpehy