The most complex part of the whole Sea Dragon concept. It didn't evev use complicated fuel pumps - the fuel and oxidizer were pushed into the engines by expanding nitrogen gas, thus eliminating a major cause of failure in rockets even today. Quite brilliant design.
I JUST NOTICED that the second set of boosters on the Orion Ark get COMPLETELY vaporized when that first nuke goes off!!! Amazing detail and acknowledgement of the forces involved!
Project orion investigated the potential use of nuclear weapons as a means for propulsion. To survive the forces the hypothetical ship would require some means of absorbing the shock. The gigantic piston at the back is a massive shield to absorb the heat and force with a small hole in the center that the nuke gets shot through.
I just found out that raptor has enough thrust per square meter to lift super Orion! If you don't believe me, here is the data for most known engines, raptor is 3.5 times better than the F1 from the saturn 5: 2,261kN/m² Raptor-FT 1,582kN/m² Raptor 1,394kN/m² Shuttle SRB 1,358kN/m² Merlin 1DFT+ 1,164kN/m² RD-191 1,162kN/m² RD-193 1,159kN/m² RD-180 1,104kN/m² RD-181 1,099kN/m² RD-170 1,051kN/m² Merlin 1D 1,013kN/m² RS-27 959kN/m² BE-4 946kN/m² RD-275M 930kN/m² H-1 923kN/m² NK-33 900kN/m² RD-275 880kN/m² Viking 5 862kN/m² Viking 2 764kN/m² Rutherford 752kN/m² RS-56 OBA 673kN/m² RS-68A 647kN/m² F-1 636kN/m² RS-68 487kN/m² RD-107 411kN/m² RS-25 SSME 363kN/m² Vulcain 311kN/m² Vulcain 2
@@rocketcello5354 Current raptor (210 tons) has 1,582kN/m² of thrust so it's still 16.5% higher than Merlin. You are probably talking about thrust to weight ratio then, but it's something else.
love it if he would speculate on 2001 - Orion taking off and docking at Space Station V? Aries 1B leaving Space Station V and landing at Clavius? Moonbus leaving Clavius moonbase? Discovery 1?
Holy crap. That Tupolev OOS/Antanov AKS concept was a thing at one point? Most likely never left the drawing board, but that would've been one hell of a thing to see taking off.
It kinda was a lash- together idea, let down badly by how poorly the SRBs turned out to be in the end. If those had worked as advertised, we might be look at one of those being tested this year instead of the SLS for the Athena program.
The neat thing about the MUSTARD flight, is how the two other crafts, could've layed adjacent to each other, with the third one center top, saving tremendous slower burning fuel or jet-to-ramjet, at the first two atmospheres in a 3SSRTO 🛫✈.. 🛩 (R as Runway). Even dive verticle like a SpaceX Mell-Falcon almost halting at top of the stratosphere layer, avoiding sonic boom, switching to subsonic glide after wing form flipping, for quicker at target land waypoint.
Very neat, especially some of the older ones that never flew and all I saw about them before was black & white drawings and descriptions (e.g. Nova). Many in there I never heard of before either.
You don't just animate the best animated rockets in the world but you make everything else (trees, atmosphere, clouds, Plumes/rocket exhaust) really great. Me when I saw your first animation: I thought they never built this?! I thought it was real footage
*A moument epic story from CGI to offical concept crafts, you got in presintation* here, bravo!!👏. Very historical with most of these designs, kept remaining in the first launch sequal syndrome, never embarking *out-the-box* of this *verticle idiocracy bureacrocy* rerun attempts. The flight path, up to the stratosphere, when you compare what the cost of a wing craft lift off with just jets & ramjet engines cost, versus a rocket, for just that *first stage* route, its nearly 10, 20 or 50x less than a rocket, depending on the rocket craft size, everything under the stratosphere ( & *kaman* line), is friendly to wings lift jets, ramjet, blade purpulsion and chem mix fuel afterburns, everything above it, friendly to rocket boosters, simple-form mass... There is hundreds of ways to get into orbit! e.g. One can also take MASSIVE infastructure crafts or vessels parked in orbit, like using *vHigh air ballons* using the same air fill as fuel. At its highest orbit known, as *merly the first stage act* ( guided by drones), than compress the air back and use some of it to continue evaluating, leterally rising the 'launch-pad' staging of the entire exo rocket, even closer, to blast off & easly catch parking in orbit velocity, The SSRToL ( *R* as runway) *or* SSVToL is actually a *Phase* sequel, versus Stage classic. e.g. ground to space rondavue *phase* is like - simple bulk air/blade purpulsion & wing lift (to Stratosphere), converting to jet after burner added task, than ramjet vhigh air attune, eventually fuel released (techinc to suggest) at *back of the ramjet cone* ( as simulated atmosphere) reaching the highest micro ion layer atmosphere while mix with afterburn static/ekectric ignition to function like a low atmosphere jet, in vhigh near exo ratio path, finally exirting pure rocket burned fuel which saved tremenously for the classic-like rocket boosters at exo orbits. Without breaking the body into stages. NO minus wasted future weather scrub. Phase convertions cruise path, NOT that intense compressed MONEY as fuel burn zenith path stage.
![ILLSLICK - THE KING'S LANDING [Freestyle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/feIJJnNkTfk/mqdefault.jpg)
Sea Dragon 2nd stage is still unbelivable, the rocket bell is not fixed liked the other but rather its bloom like a flower, it is so beautifull.
It is less like second stage and more like engine change because same tanks
7:19 rip the separator , F fot respet
@@A..T..M.. they're literally blowing up nukes in the atmospehere... the '60s man...
MUSTARD PLANE?
The most complex part of the whole Sea Dragon concept. It didn't evev use complicated fuel pumps - the fuel and oxidizer were pushed into the engines by expanding nitrogen gas, thus eliminating a major cause of failure in rockets even today. Quite brilliant design.
I JUST NOTICED that the second set of boosters on the Orion Ark get COMPLETELY vaporized when that first nuke goes off!!! Amazing detail and acknowledgement of the forces involved!
@@campbellmays9900 that whole concept (not even a real concept) is so stupid
wait it's a nuke?!
Project orion investigated the potential use of nuclear weapons as a means for propulsion. To survive the forces the hypothetical ship would require some means of absorbing the shock. The gigantic piston at the back is a massive shield to absorb the heat and force with a small hole in the center that the nuke gets shot through.
@@gazda4535 yeah. it shoots nuclear weapons out the back of the vehicle
@@gazda4535 No. It is not *a* nuke. It´s a *lot* of nukes. Project Orion would have used a ratio of one nuke per second 🤦♂️
Thanks for this reminder that every space program is a little bit Kerbal.
Well, the designs that don't get built...
@@antonhengst8667 At one point, even the ones that do were just crazy designs on paper.
I am not sure why Hollywood has not hired you yet...I love your animations.
most underrated channel on YT
yeah, it's a pity that good videos get so few views and likes; I myself am from Russia, I love this channel very much.
YT channel with the most subs: PewDiePie (Let's Player)
*I don't know if I'm up to date
Edit: Ok it's T-series I don't know what that is
@@raphaelantonrainer it's a indian music label i think
Yep I googled
We gotta change that😏
Hazegray, I thought you'd be pleased to know that your render of MAKS is used as the main image on the wikipedia page! Love the videos, keep it up!
I thought that was an aedwardbaker image
I just found out that raptor has enough thrust per square meter to lift super Orion!
If you don't believe me, here is the data for most known engines, raptor is 3.5 times better than the F1 from the saturn 5:
2,261kN/m² Raptor-FT
1,582kN/m² Raptor
1,394kN/m² Shuttle SRB
1,358kN/m² Merlin 1DFT+
1,164kN/m² RD-191
1,162kN/m² RD-193
1,159kN/m² RD-180
1,104kN/m² RD-181
1,099kN/m² RD-170
1,051kN/m² Merlin 1D
1,013kN/m² RS-27
959kN/m² BE-4
946kN/m² RD-275M
930kN/m² H-1
923kN/m² NK-33
900kN/m² RD-275
880kN/m² Viking 5
862kN/m² Viking 2
764kN/m² Rutherford
752kN/m² RS-56 OBA
673kN/m² RS-68A
647kN/m² F-1
636kN/m² RS-68
487kN/m² RD-107
411kN/m² RS-25 SSME
363kN/m² Vulcain
311kN/m² Vulcain 2
Yep, but it's small for it's thrust, so that number will be high. The current highest, not the conceptualized highest, is the Merlin 1D.
@@rocketcello5354 Current raptor (210 tons) has 1,582kN/m² of thrust so it's still 16.5% higher than Merlin.
You are probably talking about thrust to weight ratio then, but it's something else.
@@johntheux9238 oh yep, I was talking about twr, not that. thanks for bringing that up
I really love the Korolev cross on the Soyuz
7:38
"How many engines does your plane need?"
"Yes"
"Sir! We've lost an engine!" - "How can you tell?"
“Да”
it's just two an-225's strapped together, that's the most russian thing i've ever seen lmaooo 🤣
This thing makes those clickbait pkane thumbnails look realistic
@@spillcoleman "With enough thrust, you can make a brick go supersonic" - David Lewis, designer of the McDonnell Douglas F4 Phantom II.
Another great video. You're on a roll right now!
love it if he would speculate on 2001 - Orion taking off and docking at Space Station V? Aries 1B leaving Space Station V and landing at Clavius? Moonbus leaving Clavius moonbase? Discovery 1?
Maybe a fusion of Eagle Transporter from Space Station V to Clavius? Would love to see Discovery 1, yes...
I've never heard of half of those and they all sound awesome I would totally watch a video by him on all of those
This is just way too much crazy for one video!
5:51 My favorite rocket design, great video!
"Untitled Spacecraft is headed on a trans-münar trajectory"
Holy crap. That Tupolev OOS/Antanov AKS concept was a thing at one point? Most likely never left the drawing board, but that would've been one hell of a thing to see taking off.
Not only the VFX, but the sound design is always superb. Chefs kiss!
Rule #98526 in Kerbal Space Program: Check your staging! 😁
the Jupiter III looks like something I would make in KSP
It kinda was a lash- together idea, let down badly by how poorly the SRBs turned out to be in the end. If those had worked as advertised, we might be look at one of those being tested this year instead of the SLS for the Athena program.
Woooow impressionnant ! C'est vraiment magnifique 🤩
I love unconventional rocket designs, Hazegrayart, you make my day over and over again!
The only channel worth having notifications on for.
This guy deserves more subs!
Mi faborite is the 7:04 and 11:04
Incredible display outstanding concepts thank you sir or madam I enjoyed this footage immensely
I saw the Starship launch (and not land) today, 2021-03-30.
Your on-body camera work is incredible!
7:35 I see bare wing, needs more engines.
So that's how missiles are destroyed
Найкраща підбірка з усіх, які які я бачив до цього часу!
Those are some damn good animations.
Awesome animation as usual, but lots of stagings are neither strange, nor unique, nor unconventional. Still love every single bit of them.
boosters go speeeeen
The whole idea of the Orion project is somehow insane but still possible. Easily one of my favorite concepts.
Oh this looks amazing I love your videos
It's like watching all the best parts of a space movie.
USSR: how many engines?
OOS: yes
This chanel deserves millions of subscribers
The neat thing about the MUSTARD flight, is how the two other crafts, could've layed adjacent to each other, with the third one center top, saving tremendous slower burning fuel or jet-to-ramjet, at the first two atmospheres in a 3SSRTO 🛫✈.. 🛩 (R as Runway). Even dive verticle like a SpaceX Mell-Falcon almost halting at top of the stratosphere layer, avoiding sonic boom, switching to subsonic glide after wing form flipping, for quicker at target land waypoint.
Love your Stuff
Awesome compilation! Can you do the space shuttle booster variant designed to carry large mirrors to space? It looks like something from Star Trek!
After all first Shuttle was named Enterpise
Or some of the original two-stage fully-reusable flyback Shuttle designs!
Truly a great compilation. Thank you.
Fascinating!!!...🤙😎🤘
Very neat, especially some of the older ones that never flew and all I saw about them before was black & white drawings and descriptions (e.g. Nova). Many in there I never heard of before either.
I love your animations dude.They don't look like animations.
Thanks!
You don't just animate the best animated rockets in the world but you make everything else (trees, atmosphere, clouds, Plumes/rocket exhaust) really great. Me when I saw your first animation: I thought they never built this?! I thought it was real footage
MAKS/AN225 and project Orion are still my favs.
9:14 how many srb's do you want
boeing: yes
i expected the Hermes with the custom arian luncher to apper , but gess not
everybody gangsta till all the rockets going to space
*A moument epic story from CGI to offical concept crafts, you got in presintation* here, bravo!!👏. Very historical with most of these designs, kept remaining in the first launch sequal syndrome, never embarking *out-the-box* of this *verticle idiocracy bureacrocy* rerun attempts.
The flight path, up to the stratosphere, when you compare what the cost of a wing craft lift off with just jets & ramjet engines cost, versus a rocket, for just that *first stage* route, its nearly 10, 20 or 50x less than a rocket, depending on the rocket craft size, everything under the stratosphere ( & *kaman* line), is friendly to wings lift jets, ramjet, blade purpulsion and chem mix fuel afterburns, everything above it, friendly to rocket boosters, simple-form mass...
There is hundreds of ways to get into orbit!
e.g. One can also take MASSIVE infastructure crafts or vessels parked in orbit, like using *vHigh air ballons* using the same air fill as fuel. At its highest orbit known, as *merly the first stage act* ( guided by drones), than compress the air back and use some of it to continue evaluating, leterally rising the 'launch-pad' staging of the entire exo rocket, even closer, to blast off & easly catch parking in orbit velocity,
The SSRToL ( *R* as runway) *or* SSVToL is actually a *Phase* sequel, versus Stage classic.
e.g. ground to space rondavue *phase* is like - simple bulk air/blade purpulsion & wing lift (to Stratosphere), converting to jet after burner added task, than ramjet vhigh air attune, eventually fuel released (techinc to suggest) at *back of the ramjet cone* ( as simulated atmosphere) reaching the highest micro ion layer atmosphere while mix with afterburn static/ekectric ignition to function like a low atmosphere jet, in vhigh near exo ratio path, finally exirting pure rocket burned fuel which saved tremenously for the classic-like rocket boosters at exo orbits.
Without breaking the body into stages. NO minus wasted future weather scrub.
Phase convertions cruise path, NOT that intense compressed MONEY as fuel burn zenith path stage.
Remember kids don't play with nuke or you Will vaporized like the srb on the Orion ark
I think my favourites are still MAKS and ARES 1
So realistic, I’ve seen enough launches, and I confidently, think; yes this is just what it would look like.
Great animation bro 👍👍👍
Make more videos on rocket concepts
Video symbolizing all the thoughts of mankind directed into space!
Engineers: how many jet engines do you want for OOS Launching platform?
Antonov & Tupolev: YES!
This is a national treasure.
Orion: "This could be us, but you playin' with chemical rockets."
5:24 to 5:48, such a good shot
As this video progresses, things look more and more Kerbal...
Excellent animation and perspective thanks.
Normal viewer: Meh...I just browsing...
Kerbal Space Program player: Challenge accepted...
Truly loved this display, it was wonderful!
Kerbalissimo
Beauty and excellence!
Legend has it, the second stage on the last rocket never lit....
Good stuff. Dyna Soar/Titan III would've been so cool in the 60s..
do you use blender?
I love these videos! Keep it up!
Greetings from Dar es Salaam,Tanzania 🇹🇿
I have so much insporation for KSP now.
That our rocket designers are taking cues for Kerbal Space Program is somewhat unnerving.
Falcon 9’s are precisely what Boeing needs for the LMLV, apparently.
I call this the star separation.
How many engines do you want?
Antonov AKS: yes.
AMAZINGNES!!!
using the stage 1 tank as nozzle for stage 2 is so crazy
The mustard is the most British rocket I've ever seen
Great ✔️
Sad to think the MAKS minispaceplane is now very much less likely to ever launch with the loss of the An- 225.
Si, unos dibujitos muy chulos...
Best channel on YT
KSP players: write that down writ that down
Love it. Also great finish, love a bit of nexus
Everyone’s talking about Super Orion vaporising its boosters but no one’s talking about the poor Saturn V first stage getting obliterated at 07:01
Lots diff rocket types * Remembering Von Braun *
without him be no nasa ever - usa be in dark ages still .
Is there a list of the music used? It sounds awesome and fits the great animations very well.
Biggest rocket/ sea dragon.
YEASSSSSSS I LOVE THIS, your so good at these.
Hello! Can u make animation of vr-190 pobeda (in Russian “вр-190 победа»)?? It’s one of the first soviet space projects.
Love the music for SLS
One question - how do you do your plumes? I've been trying to replicate them in Blender and I just can't figure it out.
Im going to recreate all of these in ksp lol
Did you do it 👀
Ngl that pretty damn cool
Cool
oh wow, I loved the UR700!
awesome stuff dude. keep it up.
Dont you intend to make Starship launch from Mars animation?
masterpiece
Wow, that was a super good Animationsfilm from you.😀😀☺
Waiter I would like a shuttle sandwich with extra MUSTARD
7:33 uh that's a lot of engines not gonna lie TBH
7:33: *engines*
Pls make a starship animation
Great Video, beautiful, Congratulations.