The smooth transition from the filmgrain & 4:5 ratio to clear widescreen is also very well done. Easy to miss if you weren't watching for it, quality editing.
Fantastic job creating that vintage film projector vibe. in the 60s my dad was stationed at Norton AFB in SoCal when it was the Audio/Visual lab for the Air Force. One time he brought home some film reels and a projector that he checked out from the A/V lab and showed us kids clips from the Mercury and Gemini missions (Apollo had not yet flown any crewed missions). Anyway, Hazegrayart replicates the visuals of that era quite well. The only thing missing is a simulated break in the film where the screen goes solid white while the projectionist curses a blue streak in the background audio. 😀
I was the class A/V geek in first grade, (16mm & film strips with cassette audio) and don’t remember any blue streaks in any of our material. Were blue streaks a USAF-only defect?😮
What could have been before SpaceX. It wasn't that long ago that the Angry Astronaut did a video comparing the Nova concept rocket, using videos like this one, to that of SpaceX's Starship.
Gorgeous as expected - the vintage effects are cute. But I did not like the gate guard feverishly saluting with his left hand - looked like he was convulsing. But the sound effects were spot on.
Absolutely love seeing each new video you release, especially the Orion videos. And I was wondering if you could potentially do a video for the Orion Nuclear Space Battleship.
@@ArjunaKunti Same problem (see SpaceX Crew Dragon and all the problems they had trying to use NASA's simulations of three-parachute systems when Dragon needed four)
In this alternate timeline: - John F. Kennedy survived the attempt on his life in Dallas, Texas and proceeded to campaign for the ‘64 election. - In order to make his lunar promise come true, John F. Kennedy approved the test of Nova rocket, set on October 5, 1964, a month before the election. - In the end, Kennedy’s space vision defeats Goldwater’s nuclear proliferation.
Er, Kennedy was heavily re-thinking the lunar goal before he was assassinated and it seems mostly likely he would have cut NASA back rather than poured more money into it. Gemini had already beaten most of the Soviet work in space and they were only falling more and more behind so that they likely would have accepted his offer of a "joint" mission rather than Apollo
First engineer: "Okay, Von Braun wants us to come up with some sorta stabilization system for this thing, I was thinking extendable hydraulic flaps, like big airbrakes." Second engineer: (takes a massive bong hit) "How bout....... inflatable tuuuubes?" First engineer: ".... alright, I can see how that might work, but, how are we going to land something that big? The shock absorption on the legs is gonna cost us hundreds of tons and is gonna really cut into payload capacity..." Second engineer: (eyes completely red as he giggles) "........big goofy clown shoes on the tubes."
I wish they would build the Nova of the 1960’s. Eight F-1s and twelve million pounds of thrust. It would make the Saturn 5 and SLS sound like a whimper.
Excellent! Thanks for sharing this vision of what might-have-been-but-wasn't-quite with us! For a future project, please consider a video showing the flight profile of the "Willy Ley Orbital Rocket" model kit. This was originally a Monogram offering in the late 1950's that was just recently reissued by Atlantis Models this year. I'm sure this would make an impressive video! 731st Like.
Reduce the degree of seawater exposure of the engines. Though the dunk tests of the H-1 engine came out fine, there was still concern about the metallurgical effects of seawater exposure so the desire was to minimize it and hose it off as soon as possible post-recovery. The hope was that keeping it upright would help drain any water that gets in behind the injector plate.
Ok, THIS 'Could have happened' video is an excellent example of why so many older people like me, who watched the moon landings, are PISSED at any government interference of SpaceX. NASA and the US Congress. You Had Your Chance! Now, Stand Down and get the heck out of the way! You have put this entire nation At Risk! Stand Down!
Er, who do you think is paying SpaceX to do all this stuff? And as they are paying,(with our money) for what SpaceX is doing, or actually NOT doing which is the main point, we're allowed oversight and explanations when things don't go right. I'm of the same generation (or near enough) as you and I understand the reason the PUBLIC fully supported cutting NASA after the moon landings. There was never enough public interest until very recently in doing more in space so there was no money for it. Much like there is literally no actual market for Starship and really no interest in using it commercially which is pretty much WHY NASA is paying for it and as such, again, we've a right to keep SpaceX under scrutiny on the way it's spending OUR money. The government isn't "interfering" with SpaceX but holding SpaceX to existing environment, federal and state regulation violations. Keep very much in mind that Musk CHOSE to do what he's doing where it's being done despite the problems and issues this would raise above and beyond simply testing his rockets. He's essentially used NASA's need for the HLS as a cudgel against oversight and regulation from other agencies and it's telling that this no longer works so well and actions of SpaceX are coming to light.
@@randycampbell6307 I just want to add that SpaceX doesn't only get its money from the Government (the government is still a large portion nonetheless), there is a market for Falcon 9, Crew Dragon, and Starship. There are often commercial Crew Dragon missions, and SpaceX often does rideshares and other private launches, furthermore Star link makes some money too. Plus, Starship will open the doors for much cheaper and larger payload, like that of commercial space stations, large earth satellites and more. This doesn't make your point irrelevant or anything, just want to point out that what you said about there "being no market for Starship" is wrong and that SpaceX doesn't just get it's money from NASA alone.
5:06 my true question is how are they going to raise this booster off the water, like this thing to just huge, so how are they going to raise it up out of the water after being tow to the nasa harbor?
People had way more imagination back in the Sixties. If you're looking for something a little different, how about a video about Gerald Bull's space gun?
Von Braun's plan had always been to make the first stage recoverable. Our plan was to begin recovery tests using the second build of Saturn V rockets thanks to the extra thrust and mass margins of the F-1A engines. Both Johnson and Nixon nixed the second build.
@@saundby Congress actually, they had the power of the purse. NASA post Apollo had little need for more than a few Saturn V's and since they weren't going to be any cheaper if you bought 4 or 20 Congress nixed the second order. Johnson proposed an expanded budget, (much less than NASA liked but it gave them some of the projects they wanted for Apollo Applications Program) but Congress vetoed it and kept cutting NASA funding. Keep in mind the public was all for the cuts, especially once Apollo 11 "beat' the Russians.
I was already in my early 30s when this period of time occured and it was obvious that the Saturn 5 could be converted to a fully reusable rocket, but the Nixon administration put a limit on the possible budget to do it and NASAwas forced to go to the Airforce andbeg for money andforced to develope the Space Shuttle whicheveryoneknew that it would be incredibly expensive and nothinglike NASA wanted, which was a simple easily reuseable launch vehicle that could fly weekly at a drasically lowered cost, but were given a choice of either accept what the AirForce wanted or forget about the whole thing.
The worker is the one in the hard hat. The guard is the one who's been hitting the bottle. And yeah, it happened. :D Folks drank like fish back in those days. Pretty sure the worker (not uniformed) is mocking the guard with that salute. :D :D :D
![Unbelievable SATURN V Launch with Sound [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fmPHgUD-I6I/mqdefault.jpg)
Oh man, I absolutely love this aesthetic. The music, vintage filter and cgi are just brilliant
Or Hazegrey has a working alternate reality camera that samples film from nearby 'what might have been' Earths.
The smooth transition from the filmgrain & 4:5 ratio to clear widescreen is also very well done. Easy to miss if you weren't watching for it, quality editing.
You outdo yourself with each video! The historical footage filter/sequences are incredible.
Fantastic job creating that vintage film projector vibe. in the 60s my dad was stationed at Norton AFB in SoCal when it was the Audio/Visual lab for the Air Force. One time he brought home some film reels and a projector that he checked out from the A/V lab and showed us kids clips from the Mercury and Gemini missions (Apollo had not yet flown any crewed missions). Anyway, Hazegrayart replicates the visuals of that era quite well. The only thing missing is a simulated break in the film where the screen goes solid white while the projectionist curses a blue streak in the background audio. 😀
I was the class A/V geek in first grade, (16mm & film strips with cassette audio) and don’t remember any blue streaks in any of our material. Were blue streaks a USAF-only defect?😮
Another outstanding video....Brilliant. Loved hearing the voice of Cliff Charlesworth on the ascent....
Another incredible masterpiece! Fantastic job!
What could have been before SpaceX.
It wasn't that long ago that the Angry Astronaut did a video comparing the Nova concept rocket, using videos like this one, to that of SpaceX's Starship.
the pontoon floater things are extra sussy tho.
@@Muonium1 At least it wouldn't need a barge, though a real version would have landed on its side.
You make it sound like a bad thing lol. Propulsive landing for the win.
Dude, Your production quality keeps getting better and better. Fantastic Work man, please keep it up
Another crazy and beautiful project by Hazegrayart ❤️
The Super Saturn V!!!
Or a giant Polaris missile!
There is a Super Saturn that uses 4 or 6 first stage Apollo v rockets
Gorgeous as expected - the vintage effects are cute. But I did not like the gate guard feverishly saluting with his left hand - looked like he was convulsing. But the sound effects were spot on.
The stage sep scene here is so much better than previous videos, you’ve definitely improved
Wow! that flight and landing was awesome.
Spectacular composition.
Very cool retro work. It seems like it couldn't float like that stably though.
I absolutely LOVE these videos! I know they're not real but it seriously feels like I'm watching something from back in that period. Well done!
Lovely work.
How does that landing work? Looked like it was floating with the legs on top of the water. Some sort of inflatable system?
Yup, inflatable legs. Strange concept, to be honest ^^
This is real artwork here. All the details must have taken forever to include.
That was great! It looked like old film footage! Your graphics are phenomenal!
Wieder einmal ein Video für Raumfahrtfans 👍
Such a good video. You have really have got this down to a fine art. Well done!
as always.. like the operator!
Love the music!
Absolutely love seeing each new video you release, especially the Orion videos.
And I was wondering if you could potentially do a video for the Orion Nuclear Space Battleship.
I wanted this video for a long time!
Man I love this channel…..
My overall most favorite rocket
Perfect as usually.
Wow, now this is phenomenal
A triumph. Fantastic video.
This was von Braun's first idea of reusability of first stages. Why haven't we these rockets since 60 years?
We had the space shuttle instead
Big parachutes are easy to imagine and very very difficult to make work.
@@ohppig1 what about more smaller parachute?
@@ArjunaKunti Same problem (see SpaceX Crew Dragon and all the problems they had trying to use NASA's simulations of three-parachute systems when Dragon needed four)
Wow! Iwo got bigger! (Actually was a helicopter landing ship, not an aircraft carrier :) ) Great work as always! Thanks
Sounds and feels like an episode of thunderbirds 🎉🎉😂 amazing!
I’ve always wondered if Thunderbirds was the future of a universe where these rockets actually came to be.
One of your best. Thanks
Merci! 👍💪✌
In this alternate timeline:
- John F. Kennedy survived the attempt on his life in Dallas, Texas and proceeded to campaign for the ‘64 election.
- In order to make his lunar promise come true, John F. Kennedy approved the test of Nova rocket, set on October 5, 1964, a month before the election.
- In the end, Kennedy’s space vision defeats Goldwater’s nuclear proliferation.
PEACE!
Er, Kennedy was heavily re-thinking the lunar goal before he was assassinated and it seems mostly likely he would have cut NASA back rather than poured more money into it. Gemini had already beaten most of the Soviet work in space and they were only falling more and more behind so that they likely would have accepted his offer of a "joint" mission rather than Apollo
A pretty cool concept
First engineer: "Okay, Von Braun wants us to come up with some sorta stabilization system for this thing, I was thinking extendable hydraulic flaps, like big airbrakes."
Second engineer: (takes a massive bong hit) "How bout....... inflatable tuuuubes?"
First engineer: ".... alright, I can see how that might work, but, how are we going to land something that big? The shock absorption on the legs is gonna cost us hundreds of tons and is gonna really cut into payload capacity..."
Second engineer: (eyes completely red as he giggles) "........big goofy clown shoes on the tubes."
I wish they would build the Nova of the 1960’s. Eight F-1s and twelve million pounds of thrust. It would make the Saturn 5 and SLS sound like a whimper.
Excellent! Thanks for sharing this vision of what might-have-been-but-wasn't-quite with us!
For a future project, please consider a video showing the flight profile of the "Willy Ley Orbital Rocket" model kit. This was originally a Monogram offering in the late 1950's that was just recently reissued by Atlantis Models this year. I'm sure this would make an impressive video!
731st Like.
This is incredible! Would you ever consider doing a tutorial on the engine plumes?
For a second I thought it was real ❤
This is wonderful! I keep learning about interesting rockets from you. Can you show a Starship v3 full stack next to this for a size comparison?
This is the third Nova animation you've done. Also, before it goes widescreen it almost looks like a model from a Gerry Anderson show.
You could be watching a Retro Space HD film!
Love it!
Awesome!!!
Just part of what could have been.
Good landing by parachute .
You should do a size comparison of rockets
I'd LOVE to see SpaceX eventually build a Sea Dragon rocket - that would be awesome!
Come on, Elon - you *know* you want to.......... ;)
better and better!
beautiful work. are those inflatable legs ? such super cool ceonpts back then. where did all that adventerous spirit go .
Imagine the g force that thing has to hold up against with that turn 4:15
My RP-1 launch vehicle designs be like
At first I thought the first stage was a giant SRB.
why did the booster have landing legs if it just splashed down in the ocean?
Reduce the degree of seawater exposure of the engines. Though the dunk tests of the H-1 engine came out fine, there was still concern about the metallurgical effects of seawater exposure so the desire was to minimize it and hose it off as soon as possible post-recovery. The hope was that keeping it upright would help drain any water that gets in behind the injector plate.
Ok, THIS 'Could have happened' video is an excellent example of why so many older people like me, who watched the moon landings, are PISSED at any government interference of SpaceX. NASA and the US Congress. You Had Your Chance! Now, Stand Down and get the heck out of the way! You have put this entire nation At Risk! Stand Down!
Couldn't agree with you more. Politicians only interested in "what's in it for me".
Yeah, almost. Now forget your silly nationalities;• your national leaders put entire humanity at risk, just for their ridiculous power play.
🚀🏴☠️🎸
Er, who do you think is paying SpaceX to do all this stuff? And as they are paying,(with our money) for what SpaceX is doing, or actually NOT doing which is the main point, we're allowed oversight and explanations when things don't go right. I'm of the same generation (or near enough) as you and I understand the reason the PUBLIC fully supported cutting NASA after the moon landings. There was never enough public interest until very recently in doing more in space so there was no money for it. Much like there is literally no actual market for Starship and really no interest in using it commercially which is pretty much WHY NASA is paying for it and as such, again, we've a right to keep SpaceX under scrutiny on the way it's spending OUR money. The government isn't "interfering" with SpaceX but holding SpaceX to existing environment, federal and state regulation violations. Keep very much in mind that Musk CHOSE to do what he's doing where it's being done despite the problems and issues this would raise above and beyond simply testing his rockets. He's essentially used NASA's need for the HLS as a cudgel against oversight and regulation from other agencies and it's telling that this no longer works so well and actions of SpaceX are coming to light.
@@randycampbell6307 I just want to add that SpaceX doesn't only get its money from the Government (the government is still a large portion nonetheless), there is a market for Falcon 9, Crew Dragon, and Starship. There are often commercial Crew Dragon missions, and SpaceX often does rideshares and other private launches, furthermore Star link makes some money too. Plus, Starship will open the doors for much cheaper and larger payload, like that of commercial space stations, large earth satellites and more. This doesn't make your point irrelevant or anything, just want to point out that what you said about there "being no market for Starship" is wrong and that SpaceX doesn't just get it's money from NASA alone.
In the beginning looking at that pickup truck that's not 1964
Post Saturn means it can get to Uranus
LOL
Is the audio track from Apollo 4?
5:06 my true question is how are they going to raise this booster off the water, like this thing to just huge, so how are they going to raise it up out of the water after being tow to the nasa harbor?
People had way more imagination back in the Sixties. If you're looking for something a little different, how about a video about Gerald Bull's space gun?
That guy was interesting. I remember the HBO movie with Frank Langella playing Bull.
00:18 Alconauts on guard
Avionske nesreće?Zašto avioni nemaju ovakve padobrane? Znači da neko želi da ljudi poginulo u avionskoj katastrofi.
Now we know where SpaceX got the idea! 😱😝🤪🤣👍👍🇺🇸
Von Braun's plan had always been to make the first stage recoverable. Our plan was to begin recovery tests using the second build of Saturn V rockets thanks to the extra thrust and mass margins of the F-1A engines. Both Johnson and Nixon nixed the second build.
@@saundby Congress actually, they had the power of the purse. NASA post Apollo had little need for more than a few Saturn V's and since they weren't going to be any cheaper if you bought 4 or 20 Congress nixed the second order. Johnson proposed an expanded budget, (much less than NASA liked but it gave them some of the projects they wanted for Apollo Applications Program) but Congress vetoed it and kept cutting NASA funding. Keep in mind the public was all for the cuts, especially once Apollo 11 "beat' the Russians.
If rocket has to be this shape.. we prefer Starwar. 😂
1960’s starship be like
I was already in my early 30s when this period of time occured and it was obvious that the Saturn 5 could be converted to a fully reusable rocket, but the Nixon administration put a limit on the possible budget to do it and NASAwas forced to go to the Airforce andbeg for money andforced to develope the Space Shuttle whicheveryoneknew that it would be incredibly expensive and nothinglike NASA wanted, which was a simple easily reuseable launch vehicle that could fly weekly at a drasically lowered cost, but were given a choice of either accept what the AirForce wanted or forget about the whole thing.
Is look like Caseoh rocket
Glad you made a decent video again instead of those ugly shorts (mobile phone sh**), you are a great artist
Because angry astronaut?
Fake it to make it...
0:20 worker comes to work s-faced drunk and security guard tells him to get to work anyway??
The worker is the one in the hard hat. The guard is the one who's been hitting the bottle. And yeah, it happened. :D Folks drank like fish back in those days. Pretty sure the worker (not uniformed) is mocking the guard with that salute. :D :D :D
@Hazegrayart >>> Great video...👍