Where the math in 1:24 went wrong is that some of the numbers only appear after an infinite number of iterations, so there are numbers that can’t really be expressed as a true fraction.
Cartesian model, by definition, is fractal and mostly holes. We can zoom in or out (using base ten divisions - bad idea) but still discontinuous everywhere.
Close but no cigar. If the side and diagonal were exact proportions of one another then the ratio between them could be expressed via rational numbers, but they are not. The diagonal of a square is approximately 1.4142 to 4 decimal places but as it is not exactly 1.4142 then to increase the accuracy of the approximation we have to keep adding decimal places, but if we stopped adding these places this would be expressing a finite or rational number or an exact proportion. Hence irrational numbers are figment of your imagination. Another way of proving this is to try and use a never ending number in a calculation, any calculation and you will find you cannot because a number needs to have an end for the function to be applied, and if you cannot use an irrational number in a calculation, it cannot be squared or therefore be a square root. So not only are irrational numbers figments of your imagination, so too is the square root of two. The only thing real here is the approximation between the two variables but that could be called anything. The fact the sqrt2 does not even meet the definition of a square root is further evidence. There is no number when multiplied by itself can produce a prime number ergo prime numbers cannot have square roots...and two is a prime number. 😂😂😂😂😂
If the square root of 2 is irrational. Then it is true then it is irrational. If something is irrational, then it does not matter. If it is true that it is irrational, then it is true that it does not matter. The square root of 2 is irrational. Therefore the square root of 2 does not matter.
Where the math in 1:24 went wrong is that some of the numbers only appear after an infinite number of iterations, so there are numbers that can’t really be expressed as a true fraction.
Indeed our ideas about infinity are changing in the age of the computer and the practical implications of computation with very large data sets.
I'm starting to believe that someone lied to make the numbers work in their favor literally
Please expand on what you mean
Terrance Howard too
Looking forwards to the next installment! :)
Talvieno Thank you! :) I'm about halfway done with the next one, I'm hoping to release it by May 15th. It should be fun!
The next episode is irrational, so it doesn’t exist.
The numbers which can't be expressed in the form p/q are called irrational numbers so the statement 1:22 is wrong here .
The statement doesn't contradict that, so why did you call it wrong?
Cartesian model, by definition, is fractal and mostly holes. We can zoom in or out (using base ten divisions - bad idea) but still discontinuous everywhere.
Cool salvia Droid user pic
Why dont u make videos any more? It was amazing.
Thank you. Great job, keep it up :)
Close but no cigar. If the side and diagonal were exact proportions of one another then the ratio between them could be expressed via rational numbers, but they are not. The diagonal of a square is approximately 1.4142 to 4 decimal places but as it is not exactly 1.4142 then to increase the accuracy of the approximation we have to keep adding decimal places, but if we stopped adding these places this would be expressing a finite or rational number or an exact proportion. Hence irrational numbers are figment of your imagination. Another way of proving this is to try and use a never ending number in a calculation, any calculation and you will find you cannot because a number needs to have an end for the function to be applied, and if you cannot use an irrational number in a calculation, it cannot be squared or therefore be a square root. So not only are irrational numbers figments of your imagination, so too is the square root of two. The only thing real here is the approximation between the two variables but that could be called anything. The fact the sqrt2 does not even meet the definition of a square root is further evidence. There is no number when multiplied by itself can produce a prime number ergo prime numbers cannot have square roots...and two is a prime number. 😂😂😂😂😂
Looks like the pyramids in Egypt from above
The sibilance is too painful to listen to.
If the square root of 2 is irrational. Then it is true then it is irrational. If something is irrational, then it does not matter. If it is true that it is irrational, then it is true that it does not matter. The square root of 2 is irrational. Therefore the square root of 2 does not matter.
Very good :)
Greece didn’t originate anything they stole it from Africa …nice though
Indians are way more advanced in Maths.....
No
@@dancewithgoli7817 u are not indian....i think so......
Hope
You know “indians” are black people
Super b
:)