Making sense of irrational numbers - Ganesh Pai

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 มิ.ย. 2024
  • View full lesson: ed.ted.com/lessons/making-sens...
    Like many heroes of Greek myths, the philosopher Hippasus was rumored to have been mortally punished by the gods. But what was his crime? Did he murder guests or disrupt a sacred ritual? No, Hippasus's transgression was mathematically proving the hitherto unprovable. Ganesh Pai describes the history and math behind irrational numbers.
    Lesson by Ganesh Pai, animation by Anton Trofimov.

ความคิดเห็น • 1.3K

  • @milyon8910
    @milyon8910 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4078

    oh my goodness i just realized that "rational" means it can be expressed in ratios. I thought mathematicians just didn't think the numbers made sense.

    • @sheena_.
      @sheena_. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      😭😂

    • @santripta
      @santripta 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      Same

    • @Boog1137
      @Boog1137 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Took me a while to make this connection too

    • @IMVeer0072
      @IMVeer0072 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Peter Griffin moment

    • @Its_Pritam_
      @Its_Pritam_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      WTF! Same

  • @XxUginxX
    @XxUginxX 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1056

    Hippasus' colleagues punished him for discovering irrational numbers? Wow, that's truly irrational!

    • @commmander64
      @commmander64 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Honestly if i where during that time i would think of the gods and their believers a bit LESS in value since they can't handle the truth of Hippasus's work. Ironically that would make me have the same impiety i guess.

    • @noammosek1319
      @noammosek1319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Peek comedy

    • @quantumbracket6995
      @quantumbracket6995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      314 likes nice

    • @buzyparticals3753
      @buzyparticals3753 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      SUS HIPPO

    • @randompoop1565
      @randompoop1565 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, he deserves it!!!

  • @xmaxwell7987
    @xmaxwell7987 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2707

    This should've been titled "Rationalizing Irrational Numbers".

    • @dragosdragos3961
      @dragosdragos3961 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      lol

    • @flamingpi2245
      @flamingpi2245 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Omg what a missed opportunity

    • @trevorallen3212
      @trevorallen3212 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      2/sqrt(2)=sqrt(2)

    • @theobserver314
      @theobserver314 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@trevorallen3212 0_o

    • @trevorallen3212
      @trevorallen3212 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theobserver314 2/(cubicroot(4))=cubicroot(2)
      2/(4throot(8))=4throot(2)...
      I can go on but, it be pain to type so here is formula for equivalent irrational numbers of nthroots.
      Base/(nthroot(Base^(n-1)))=
      nthroot(base)

  • @Stray0
    @Stray0 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3901

    > "Are you the square root of 2?"
    > "Because I feel irrational around you."
    How to flirt. :D

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      Meow

    • @ThomasNimmesgern
      @ThomasNimmesgern 8 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      +Cat Are you hungry?

    • @cortster12
      @cortster12 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      +Stray Pay Or, they will think you are calling them fat.

    • @rishovmondal1524
      @rishovmondal1524 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      howard wallowitz,

    • @stellalpina
      @stellalpina 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +cortster12 Definitely. I guess it would only work with mathematicians. :P

  • @-.._.-_...-_.._-..__..._.-.-.-
    @-.._.-_...-_.._-..__..._.-.-.- 8 ปีที่แล้ว +529

    _"I'm sure that I will always be_
    _A lonely number like root three_
    _The three is all that's good and right,_
    _Why must my three keep out of sight_
    _Beneath the vicious square root sign,_
    _I wish instead I were a nine-_
    _For nine could thwart this evil trick,_
    _with just some quick arithmetic_
    _I know I'll never see the sun, as 1.7321_
    _Such is my reality, a sad irrationality_
    _When hark! What is this I see,_
    _Another square root of a three_
    _As quietly co-waltzing by,_
    _Together now we multiply_
    _To form a number we prefer,_
    _Rejoicing as an integer_
    _We break free from our mortal bonds_
    _With the wave of magic wands_
    _Our square root signs become unglued_
    _Your love for me has been renewed"_
    -Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay (2008)

    • @sophiejones7727
      @sophiejones7727 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      best part of that movie :D

    • @rahulshah9993
      @rahulshah9993 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Sorry to disappoint you but square root of 3 isn't lonely at all , infact there are infinitely many numbers as close to it as you want 😊

    • @somebodyonce6063
      @somebodyonce6063 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      (clapping )

    • @allenaegarcia3635
      @allenaegarcia3635 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      David S. Cats eyes nebula.. nice

    • @TurnipBoy666
      @TurnipBoy666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      whoa

  • @adamn7409
    @adamn7409 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1339

    Hippasus: *discovers irrational numbers*
    God: wait that’s illegal

    • @iceenderman-fm4kb
      @iceenderman-fm4kb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Let √4=p/q(here,p and q don't have common factor)
      q√4=p
      4(q^2)=p^2
      So,as q^2 times 4 is p^2 we can say that p=4a
      4(q^2)=(4a)^2
      4(q^2)=16a^2
      q^2=4a^s
      Does, this means√4 is irrational number

    • @thesushi1947
      @thesushi1947 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @Agrim Verma
      Assume √4 = p/q where p and q are coprime and are both integers
      q√4 = p
      4q² = p²
      Already we can find two coprime integers, with q = 1 and p = 2 (or any pair where p =2q for that matter), to prove it so we can conclude that √4 can be written as 2/1 as those numbers satisfy our modified equation and so confirm the original assumption. Another variable wouldn't be needed to solve the equation like you had, but one was used in the video to illustrate that p was even rather than specifically a multiple of the radicand.
      This same reasoning can't work with √2 because no coprime integers can satisfy 2q² = p², and the same method can be applied to √n by finding (or proving that there aren't) any coprime integers to satisfy nq² = p².

    • @mohammadazad8350
      @mohammadazad8350 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@iceenderman-fm4kb what you have done wrong is: 4(q^2)=p^2 means (p) is even but what you have done is assuming that p=4a since (a) is an integer 4a CANNOT be equal to 2 which means that you eliminated the only possible answer (2) what you must do instead is: let p=2a(a is an integer) then 4(q^2)=(2a)^2 => 4(q^2)=4(a^2) => q^2=a^2 => q=a => √4=p/q=2a/a=2 notice that you can't prove that q is odd or even since it's equal to an integer (a) which can be either even or odd and it turns out that it's odd(1)

    • @NewCalculus
      @NewCalculus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He couldn't have because "irrational numbers" don't exist in mathematics. Chuckle.

    • @MrTeen-ul7yc
      @MrTeen-ul7yc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@iceenderman-fm4kb Absolutely not! The implication from Step 3 to Step 4 is incorrect. 4(q^2)=p^2 does not imply p=4a. Consider values p = 6 and q = 3. Then q^2 = 9 and 4(q^2) = 36 = p^2. But p is 6, which is not divisible by 4. Notice how q itself became a factor of p which already contradicts the initial assumption. In general if the square of a number is divisible by 4 then that does not necessarily imply that the number is also a multiple of 4. Any number that is congruent to 2 or 0 mod 4 will become congruent to 0 mod 4.
      What you've proved is not that √4 is irrational. Interestingly, the contradiction you've arrived at proves that the first assumption is false. That is p and q must have common factors specifically in this case that either p | q or q | p. which can then be reduced to the trivial form where the denominator is 1, at which point you're just saying n = n/1.

  • @adityakhanna113
    @adityakhanna113 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1519

    the lesson by "Ganesh Pi"

    • @salehsalem9638
      @salehsalem9638 8 ปีที่แล้ว +148

      +Wizard Johnson I don't think that was the reference or joke there. The original commenter spelled the last name wrong deliberately to show the irrational... I don't even know why I'm explaining this

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Meow

    • @InfinityLearn_NEET
      @InfinityLearn_NEET 8 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      Good one Aditya! I will make sure our founder reads this comment :)

    • @kronk5866
      @kronk5866 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Illuminati confirmed

    • @RoyalDog214
      @RoyalDog214 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Ganesh 3.141592653589

  • @FlyAVersatran
    @FlyAVersatran 4 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    Great explanation.
    I have a degree in applied mathematics and have never heard this pontificated so well.
    Thank you.

    • @tarunkumarcs2374
      @tarunkumarcs2374 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@harshitabhagat8467 ig cbse has it in 9th also

    • @NOOBCRASTINATOR69
      @NOOBCRASTINATOR69 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tarunkumarcs2374 ICSE in 7th grade.. I was like wait I've proved that!!!

  • @VikasVJois
    @VikasVJois 8 ปีที่แล้ว +693

    Nice proof and illustration/animation

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Meow

    • @InfinityLearn_NEET
      @InfinityLearn_NEET 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Thank you Vikas, our founder collaborated with TED-Ed to create this lesson :)

    • @YathishDhavala
      @YathishDhavala 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Why is Hippasus's time shown as 8 BC? He belonged to 5th Century BC.

    • @sauceaddict9569
      @sauceaddict9569 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't Memorise wierd flex but ok😂😂

    • @elee2968
      @elee2968 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not their proof.

  • @FrancisACNH
    @FrancisACNH 4 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    “The gods did not appreciate being contradicted”
    They’re just like parents and r/dankmemes members: They destroy whoever disagrees with them, even when losing an argument

    • @sriramradhakrishna878
      @sriramradhakrishna878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It's pretty much all of Reddit at this point tbh

    • @FrancisACNH
      @FrancisACNH 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sriram Radhakrishna Yeah, mostly dankmemes tho

    • @Blurrybob
      @Blurrybob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Can't help but agree

  • @AnantMall
    @AnantMall 8 ปีที่แล้ว +304

    "instead of adhering to norms decided to prove it was something new" In that world at that time doing this would take immense courage!

    • @polaroidstyles9348
      @polaroidstyles9348 8 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      even in our world now tbh(:

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Meow

    • @sohamacharya171
      @sohamacharya171 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      In any world at any time actually

    • @chaotickreg7024
      @chaotickreg7024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For all humans always actually

  • @Puggalug
    @Puggalug 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2456

    Good, now cover negative numbers, imaginary/complex numbers, hyperreals, surreals, and split octonians!

    • @rnyjizzle
      @rnyjizzle 8 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Well square root of a negative number should be quite obvious to realise

    • @ptyamin6976
      @ptyamin6976 8 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      What is a split octonian?

    • @GoldenKingStudio
      @GoldenKingStudio 8 ปีที่แล้ว +132

      Something he most likely read on Wikipedia. You don't need to worry about it, I doubt he could explain it to you. (If the guy actually knows it, I don't mean to offend him, I was just making a joke because he rattled off a list of semi-related math terms that all happen to be linked together in Wikipedia. I wouldn't have known about many of those concepts without Wikipedia, so I am not trying to sound better.)
      An octonion (he spelled it incorrectly) is an extension of complex numbers into an 8 dimensional number line, like how real numbers are on one number line, and complex numbers have two number lines, octonions have 8 that represent them. They have lots of special properties that make them interesting to mathematicians, and split octonions are similar to octonions in that they are 8 dimensional, but they are made by different rules, to put it simply. Like how complex numbers have a + bi, where i is the square root of 1, split octonions have 8 parts to them. I don't really know that much about them or why these particular definitions are useful, but there is a basic rundown. There is a method of construction that allows for the generation of lots of arbitrary algebras, but this particular one must have some special properties.

    • @Puggalug
      @Puggalug 8 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      +GoldenKingStudio Yes, you're partially right. I did spell octonion wrong, and I wouldn't have been able to explain them. But I didn't get those concepts from Wikipedia - I got them from an awesome TH-camr that combines drawing and math named Vihart, in a video explaining why 0.9(repeating) is equal to 1.

    • @GoldenKingStudio
      @GoldenKingStudio 8 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Puggalug That was a very good video, yes. Glad to see another fan.

  • @igb5551
    @igb5551 8 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Please, never stop doing this videos, they are too good

  • @margaretbonassar709
    @margaretbonassar709 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    “The gods cursed a human for a proof of contradiction” was not the geometry hot take I was expecting today but it is welcome nonetheless

  • @TheGamerzXChannel
    @TheGamerzXChannel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great abstract video 🙂 please make more of them, they are the juice for my brains!

  • @RK-ep8qy
    @RK-ep8qy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +682

    I'm feeling a little…irrational now

    • @jehovaservant_591
      @jehovaservant_591 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Ropsana Khanom
      HA HA HA HA HA HA.
      Punny.

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meow

    • @terryendicott2939
      @terryendicott2939 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Have some Pi and you can be transcendental.

    • @et496
      @et496 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'll give you a 3.1415926535897932.

    • @primacahyadi4354
      @primacahyadi4354 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here

  • @minhaslpu
    @minhaslpu 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am a tutor and was teaching number systems to my students. They couldn't understand much and then TED made this Video(so GLAD) and i showed this video to them and believe me, they understood everything :)
    Thanks TED for making our life easier :)

    • @InfinityLearn_NEET
      @InfinityLearn_NEET 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great to hear that Rajat. Our founder was the educator for this lesson. Thank you :)

  • @JoseAngelC
    @JoseAngelC 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Great! finally another narrator!

  • @Rav3r916
    @Rav3r916 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    wow. the animation is amazing. really great for visual learners.

  • @KeqingMain278
    @KeqingMain278 8 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    Well played, Hippasus.

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Meow

    • @XenophonSoulis
      @XenophonSoulis 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hippasus was NOT punished by any god, but by his fellow Pyrhagoreans.

    • @syncradar
      @syncradar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SUS

    • @kfarbarata
      @kfarbarata 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@XenophonSoulis when u lidering a cult, ppl see u as god, lol, ask donnald duck 'bout his trip in mathmagic land

  • @lazybacon5282
    @lazybacon5282 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    0:27 The man has blonde hair is doing the floss

  • @W.M.-
    @W.M.- 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    really well made video, was hoping for a geometrical proof though seeing as algebra wasn't discovered in 5 BC

  • @alfonsogarcia608
    @alfonsogarcia608 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lovely video, clear, concise and with subtle humour.
    Thank you!

  • @chronic295
    @chronic295 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    These lessons never dissapoint!

  • @VEROTIKAA
    @VEROTIKAA 8 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    wow omg really so beautifully put and explained in such simplistic mode that never once had i even thought to put it like that but now that i see it it makes sense wow gteat video thank you from the bottom of my heart even my 7 yearr old understood thank you

  • @dsc4178
    @dsc4178 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It's an interesting paradox: the length of the hypotenuse is always a set, specific length, and the diameter and circumference of a circle are too; yet irrational numbers are not in any real way a specific length.

  • @birawaich
    @birawaich 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a really great TED-Ed, loved the animation on this one :) (and the topic)

  • @prof.einsteindarcy3951
    @prof.einsteindarcy3951 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great job guys! I have a much clearer understanding of irrational numbers now! Wish all my classes were like this:)

  • @djr5995
    @djr5995 8 ปีที่แล้ว +148

    Making *sense* of *irrational* numbers
    . . . . . I see what you did there

    • @iceenderman-fm4kb
      @iceenderman-fm4kb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let √4=p/q(here,p and q don't have common factor)
      q√4=p
      4(q^2)=p^2
      So,as q^2 times 4 is p^2 we can say that p=4a
      4(q^2)=(4a)^2
      4(q^2)=16a^2
      q^2=4a^s
      Does, this means√4 is irrational number because here ,
      2q=p
      And
      q=2a
      And this means both p and q are even and have as common factor which cannot be true since contradicts the fact that p and q cannot have a common factor

  • @jonbenge2383
    @jonbenge2383 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This made so much more sense than when I was in high school. I wish my teacher had explained concepts like this much more clearly instead of saying "Because they are not rational"; probably would have gotten a better grade...
    Thanks Ted!

  • @min11benja
    @min11benja 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW! I never really understood irational numbers this well! Animation is a powerfull thing

  • @D0GBOOT
    @D0GBOOT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for making this so easy to understand, it was very helpful!

  • @Piyushks02
    @Piyushks02 6 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    The Animation was so Dope!

  • @Supremebubble
    @Supremebubble 8 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Even more interesting is that it is impossible to plot the number pi on the real number line with only using ruler and compass. Same goes for the number e. These are called transcendental numbers however the proof is rather complicated.

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meow

    • @hawkecrail5186
      @hawkecrail5186 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well... You could technically plot it it would just be not exactly perfect

    • @hyrekandragon2665
      @hyrekandragon2665 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It has to be exact though. If you can't do it with absolute and exact precision using a straight edge and a compass, then it is transcedental.

    • @Arkalius80
      @Arkalius80 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's not hard to prove pi is transcendental after you prove e is (which is quite hard). It is known that a transcendental number raised to an algebraic power other than 0 will produce a transcendental number. We know that e ^ (i * pi) = -1, and we know e is transcendental and -1 is algebraic. So, that means i * pi must not be algebraic. Since i is algebraic, pi must be transcendental.

    • @martind2520
      @martind2520 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Alex Chuoy
      That is incorrect. the cube root of 2 is not transcendental but cannot be constructed using compass and straight-edge either.
      All transcendental numbers cannot be constructed but that does not mean that all numbers that cannot be constructed are transcendental.

  • @finalislytan8342
    @finalislytan8342 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Narration is done in a very good and clear way

  • @thompson5085
    @thompson5085 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is really cool! We're learning about Pi in class and I'm going to show this to my teacher!

  • @niory
    @niory 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I have such a bad relationship with math and feel sorry for it

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Meow

    • @XenophonSoulis
      @XenophonSoulis 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Cat Woof
      +sara meachel At least you know what you lose (unlike others who don't know that).

    • @joshua50101
      @joshua50101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      does it remind you about your "x" since you don't know "y" she left you?

  • @legofan431
    @legofan431 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    very awesome animations, I really learned somehting today that 13 years of school didn't teach me

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meow

    • @XenophonSoulis
      @XenophonSoulis 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Woof

    • @iceenderman-fm4kb
      @iceenderman-fm4kb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let √4=p/q(here,p and q don't have common factor)
      q√4=p
      4(q^2)=p^2
      So,as q^2 times 4 is p^2 we can say that p=4a
      4(q^2)=(4a)^2
      4(q^2)=16a^2
      q^2=4a^s
      Does, this means√4 is irrational number because here ,
      2q=p
      And
      q=2a
      And this means both p and q are even and have as common factor which cannot be true since contradicts the fact that p and q cannot have a common factor

    • @eladidu3
      @eladidu3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@iceenderman-fm4kb "as q^2 times 4 is p^2 we can say that p=4a" no, that is false

  • @orangepaint
    @orangepaint 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was so beautiful to watch. Thank you!

  • @infundere
    @infundere 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, incredible animations! I'd love to learn to animate mathematics like this someday.

  • @V3nky_
    @V3nky_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    3:26 Ohhh!! That Activity did in School 👍🏼

  • @basicnpcc
    @basicnpcc 8 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    Discrete mathematics at its finest.

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Meow

    • @ptyamin6976
      @ptyamin6976 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What is discrete math?

    • @basicnpcc
      @basicnpcc 8 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      PT Yamin A sub-set of mathematics like trigonometry or algebra. Discrete math is where the proofs come from for our mathematical equations. In math, we need to prove everything that we do. Through methods like induction proofs, we can do this. For example, you can prove that the square root of two is irrational like in the video. If you want to be a Computer Science major in college or maybe a Math major, this class will probably be required.

    • @willnewman9783
      @willnewman9783 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      This whole video has nothing to do with discrete mathematics.

    • @hewhomustnotbenamed5912
      @hewhomustnotbenamed5912 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lord Gaben is that you if so please answer my prairs release left 4 dead 3 half life 3 and the pyro update for tf2

  • @safaesafae6041
    @safaesafae6041 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you another great video from TED ED It's amazing and irrational how much you make maths easy

  • @lexinaut
    @lexinaut 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quite nicely presented and relevant. As an educator, I still find that irrational numbers make people . . . nervous! However, from my reading, no one apparently knows precisely which irrational number Hippasus either proved was irrational, or revealed was irrational (if someone else proved it). Root 2, of course, is a very likely candidate, since it is present in a simple unit square. For this reason, I commonly call Root 2 "the Monster in the Unit Square (with comical yet serious intent). I agree! We should appreciate the adventure of irrational numbers rather than excessively fearing them! Mathematics is a great adventure indeed! Have a great day!

  • @nabila7628
    @nabila7628 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    So I have finally found one of the inventors of math
    *discreetly adds him to hit list *

    • @Morningstar_37
      @Morningstar_37 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @QuantumRat2005 Legends say they already have a time machine. And I believe these legends because they come from extinct cultures all around the world, with millenials old stones spelling the name "Nabila" in English

    • @verdessence
      @verdessence 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @MthYsdAsd throw him with statue of numbers

  • @experienceeverything4841
    @experienceeverything4841 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Only Indian students will know that we have the proof of this in our class 10 syllabus.

  • @mirdochegal4598
    @mirdochegal4598 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this video!! The style it is made of and the narrator are very nice :) Plus the explanation also made it very clear how this all happened ^^

  • @Spamster3212
    @Spamster3212 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a great channel, I'm very glad I found it.

  • @LeHoangBac
    @LeHoangBac 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    3:44 Ooh, the golden ratio.

    • @crweewrc1388
      @crweewrc1388 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it's called The Spiral Of Theodorus.

  • @polaroidstyles9348
    @polaroidstyles9348 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love this

  • @garydunken7934
    @garydunken7934 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally finally finally.... a good explanation if irrational numbers. Well done.

  • @jonahcarter196
    @jonahcarter196 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    2 points response to Making sense of irrational numbers-Ganesh Pai The things I learned from this video is the history of irrational numbers and better ways to solve irrational numbers. the message the narrator was trying to send out was decimals and ratios are only ways to express numbers. What I was thinking about while watching this video are ways to solve irrational numbers and how I can understand it. I likes that at the very beginning she mentioned the philosopher Hippasus and his discovery towards mathematics.

  • @hithere-nk1ee
    @hithere-nk1ee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I watch all these ted-ed videos but never really understand them

    • @channel-wf1ev
      @channel-wf1ev 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      try to "split" every explication to understand the video

  • @CsVipar4
    @CsVipar4 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great animation

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Meow

  • @seshasayeesudharsan7938
    @seshasayeesudharsan7938 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is such an awesome way to teach irrational numbers

  • @BangMaster96
    @BangMaster96 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish school taught us math this way, it's so much more fun to learn this way, and now i actually want to learn about square roots and irrational numbers.

  • @TrueInvisible
    @TrueInvisible 8 ปีที่แล้ว +309

    conclusion doing math = you go to hell , to hell with math "literally"

  • @memine226
    @memine226 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    irrational number like square root 2 is fine. but the real problem is Transcendental number. it is NOT a root of a non-zero polynomial equation with rational coefficients. We can't use a nice simple formula to express it. Except using a symbol like pi or e, not really much we can do... Yet they are so useful and powerful!

    • @mmae8266
      @mmae8266 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Me Mine im first befor that *CAT*

  • @naveedahsan7315
    @naveedahsan7315 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the knowledge beyond textbooks.

  • @muffinszss
    @muffinszss 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such amazing animation

  • @cletuslopes159
    @cletuslopes159 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The irony That the person who made this videos is ganesh Pai(pie)

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Meow

    • @ankurama42
      @ankurama42 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      how is that irony?

    • @hijack69
      @hijack69 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      His surname seems a bit irrational

    • @InfinityLearn_NEET
      @InfinityLearn_NEET 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, and Ganesh Pai/Pie/Pi loves math :)

  • @abhijeettalukdar5004
    @abhijeettalukdar5004 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We also proved this
    I am a 10th standard student from India

  • @hrag03
    @hrag03 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, really so beautifully, clearly put and explained in such simplistic way. My teachers used to tell me that I should always "remember" that sqrt(2) is irrational and cannot be shown in a rational way. But after watching the proof, now everything started to make sense. I wonder if every problem has a solution, then why can't this irrational numbers have solutions too? Also there may be other numbers in the infinite set that are in a similar condition to sqrt(2) that cannot be proven.

    • @Grizzly01-vr4pn
      @Grizzly01-vr4pn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There certainly are.
      At present, it is not known (and therefore unproven) if π + e, πe, π/e, π^e, π^√2 or ln π are irrational or not.

  • @yutikasingh5443
    @yutikasingh5443 ปีที่แล้ว

    Everything is making sense. Great explanation.

  • @diba4707
    @diba4707 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Came here for a Math’s video ,
    Got a history lecture instead

  • @davidribosome4326
    @davidribosome4326 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    video: anything times 2 is even
    me: 2.5 x 2
    video; wait thats illegal

  • @deday6525
    @deday6525 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome animation! !! thank you ted ed !!!

  • @canilogin1730
    @canilogin1730 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The number "e", aka Euler's Number: "A M I A J O K E T O Y O U?"

  • @jeromeorji1057
    @jeromeorji1057 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When does Life of Ganesh Pai come out?

  • @bronzejourney5784
    @bronzejourney5784 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How simple and smart is that? Great video, as always.

  • @paerpo9577
    @paerpo9577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally a comprehensible class🙄 Thnx 😁

  • @sumaiyaiqbal4345
    @sumaiyaiqbal4345 8 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    can we appreciate the fact that the lesson is by ganesh 'Pi' :P

    • @nadiaxantho
      @nadiaxantho 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I didn't notice that! :0

  • @Cloiss_
    @Cloiss_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is a cool version of the proof, but it's not how Hippasus concluded this... there was no algebra in his time

  • @samardev3725
    @samardev3725 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The video was informative :D
    Please make a video on the idea behind complex numbers

  • @KulvinderSingh-pm7cr
    @KulvinderSingh-pm7cr 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautifully explained!!

  • @anveshasingh8672
    @anveshasingh8672 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love pretending that I understand these videos!

  • @jordantan2543
    @jordantan2543 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    now i know where the word rational comes from

    • @religionbuster7180
      @religionbuster7180 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seriously dude? You should go back prep

    • @eugenekudlanov3128
      @eugenekudlanov3128 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Jordan Tan
      It comes from ur mum because she was telling me to talk mathematical to her

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meow

    • @BionicKing
      @BionicKing 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Rational comes from the Latin, "ratio," meaning reason. How the heck did you figure that out just by watching this video?

    • @soggytoasty
      @soggytoasty 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL SAME. i always thought rational came with the word ration and ration means a portion of food so i thought its just a unique word of its own

  • @malinimurali7398
    @malinimurali7398 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is exactly what I learnt in school !!!!! Thanks Ted!

  • @chris_tzikas
    @chris_tzikas 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I feel clever now cause I knew the answer lol

    • @NewCalculus
      @NewCalculus 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I bet you didn't!
      www.linkedin.com/pulse/%25CF%2580-%25CE%25B4%25CE%25B5%25CE%25BD-%25CF%2583%25CE%25B7%25CE%25BC%25CE%25B1%25CE%25AF%25CE%25BD%25CE%25B5%25CE%25B9-%25CE%25B1%25CF%2581%25CE%25B9%25CE%25B8%25CE%25BC%25CF%258C%25CF%2582-john-gabriel/

    • @brainded653
      @brainded653 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NewCalculus shut up

  • @spencerpoore5805
    @spencerpoore5805 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Where is Anthony Anderson? I can't watch without his voice!!!

  • @strugglingmuslimah2570
    @strugglingmuslimah2570 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome animation and expalined very well

  • @bluebyrd1300
    @bluebyrd1300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so fascinating 🤯

  • @leonardohelveciodeoliveira5233
    @leonardohelveciodeoliveira5233 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Two times any number = an even number" what about 0.3 for an example

    • @samueltong8061
      @samueltong8061 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Whole number

    • @maryroserivera7946
      @maryroserivera7946 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      can we get 1000 subscribers without content
      All decimals are even
      Because
      0.3/2 = 0.15

  • @BagaJr
    @BagaJr 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    3:42 When all of those triangles are drawn showing all the roots of integers, it kind of reminds me of something, but I can't quite remember what... is that from some other important math concept or am I just crazy?

    • @ArmandoMachado92
      @ArmandoMachado92 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Baga Jr I saw it too. You are talking about the Fibonacci Sequence :)

    • @BagaJr
      @BagaJr 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Armando Machado I know each hypotenuse is the square root of a whole number and the outside edges are all 1, but I don't see where the fibonacci numbers come into play. What am I missing here?

    • @morethejamesx39
      @morethejamesx39 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Baga Jr you're not thinking of complex numbers and how you can multiply them and find the product graphically using triangles are you?

    • @InfinityLearn_NEET
      @InfinityLearn_NEET 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's the Spiral of Theodorus :)

    • @ArmandoMachado92
      @ArmandoMachado92 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Baga Jr I made a mistake. I totally forgot of what Don't Memorise said! The Spiral of Theodorus.

  • @kietpham4635
    @kietpham4635 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'll have to watch it over and over again

  • @hijazisci
    @hijazisci 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work 👏👏👏👏💐

  • @kaylinealsen2651
    @kaylinealsen2651 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Narrator: "Don't be afraid to explore the impossible."
    Me: *fails Math test*

    • @d.akiehs
      @d.akiehs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Kayline Alsen same 😭

    • @ucbinhcam3871
      @ucbinhcam3871 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Me too. Oh! I hate Maths...

  • @shrutigupta250
    @shrutigupta250 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    - Ganesh PAI
    Why has nobody commented about it?

    • @terrariaman8454
      @terrariaman8454 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dude loads of people have commented about it.

  • @awkweird_panda
    @awkweird_panda 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was informative. Loved it.

  • @Saj1037_
    @Saj1037_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s insane how smart one would have to be so long ago to figure this out. Creating/discovering math is one of the most fascinating things mankind is capable of.

  • @catalonyking
    @catalonyking 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    please don't upload any video without subtitles ! please please please :(

    • @catalonyking
      @catalonyking 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      LagiNaLangAko23 but i don't understand all show .I am a novice in learning english

    • @babyfingers9874
      @babyfingers9874 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      you can check the subtitles by clicking the 'CC' button. It is found where you see three dots on top of each other

    • @catalonyking
      @catalonyking 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mikel Arenas but "CC" not available

    • @sophiejones7727
      @sophiejones7727 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's not available on this video.

    • @babyfingers9874
      @babyfingers9874 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh, then that should put it on

  • @rachanabaditha9618
    @rachanabaditha9618 6 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    We learned this in school, and so I proved *Root 4* is irrational using the same method...
    ...my teacher was not pleased

    • @joijoi8782
      @joijoi8782 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Substitute p to 4 and q to 1 through the video

    • @devanshkamra5652
      @devanshkamra5652 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I know what you did......but there is one mistake.... You may have came across a result where you got 4q^2=p^2, from here you may have deduced that p must have 4 as its factor. But this law only applies to prime numbers. If p^2 has x as factor then p also has x as factor ONLY IF x is a prime number (try it out yourself)

    • @RahulMaru3507
      @RahulMaru3507 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      root 4 is 2

  • @gopal.
    @gopal. 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved the last line 👌

  • @nuetralkitty58
    @nuetralkitty58 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3:43 That's a square root spiral right? I had an art integration activity in maths for that. It's seriously amazing how numbers can be connected to concepts like art, music, cosmology etc. I wonder if we will ever find a way to define irrational numbers? There IS a lot of freedom in maths after all.

  • @midnightshaddow7612
    @midnightshaddow7612 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Hey guess you can say a lot in this world is made by numbers, specifially 1 and 0

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Meow

    • @jeromeeuler168
      @jeromeeuler168 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually everything is.

    • @XenophonSoulis
      @XenophonSoulis 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Woof

    • @alisonlaett9625
      @alisonlaett9625 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@XenophonSoulis +Ξενοφώντας Σούλης
      +Cat
      Why are you guys writing the same meow woof thing on every comment? Are you bots?

    • @XenophonSoulis
      @XenophonSoulis 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alisonlaett9625 I'm trying to scare him/her, 'cause cats are afraid of dogs.

  • @OmnipotentO
    @OmnipotentO 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Until you try to divide by 0.

    • @ASOUE
      @ASOUE 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meow

    • @khorps4756
      @khorps4756 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      already did, the answer i got was...

    • @blabbityblah
      @blabbityblah 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can't tell if joking or serious. Please confirm.

    • @ESL1984
      @ESL1984 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      blabbityblah You can't divide by 0. Because if you could then let's assume it gives us a value like 3/0=a ok, then lets say 4/0=b so we move zero to the other side of each equation and we get that 4=0xb and 3=0xa we know that 0x(any number)=0 so 4=0 and 3=0 both don't make sense and also it implies that 4=3. All of this is nonsense, don't try to divide by 0 unless you are dealing with limits, that's completely another story.

    • @Multibe150
      @Multibe150 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      JoSe74248 However, there is a number that you can safely divide by 0: 0. If you divide 0/0, your ecuation becomes 0x=0, and any number can fill this requirement.

  • @karsangtamang9337
    @karsangtamang9337 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    😊😊😊😊..thank you very much ted...i finally got this rational and irrational number idea 😊

  • @oferzilberman5049
    @oferzilberman5049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was in a group of 3 more friends and we called ourselves "3 guys and the square root of negative 2" (me being referred to as the square root of negative 2) and we all just loved this name, It was awesome.

  • @MoneyXJatt
    @MoneyXJatt 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's simple 2÷root 2 = root 2 lol 😁

    • @DekuStickGamer
      @DekuStickGamer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      My God...he's done it...

    • @Heropadopa
      @Heropadopa 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Money Jatt I'm even more confused now.

    • @omkarchavan5940
      @omkarchavan5940 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      then what about that root 2 in denominator....???

    • @mouradqqch1767
      @mouradqqch1767 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      false. 2/sqrt (2) =/= sqrt (2)

    • @dirfgiS
      @dirfgiS 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Mourad Qqch Of course it is, it can also be written as 2^1/2^(1/2) = 2^(1-1/2) = 2^(1/2) = sqrt(2)

  • @bekir8504
    @bekir8504 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Realy good explanation...thanks