I remember once I was Drunk, returning from my friends home. it was Dusk, I was Driving 2008 Wagon R LXI. Traffic was moderate, I was chilling around 60 kmph. A red Suzuki swift was taking U-Turn, from my right to left side. Driver with two kids and Driver's Wife was in the Swift. When The lady in the red car saw Wagon R coming to almost about to hit their car on the left rear. She freaked out and almost Died, Our cars was so close to be in fatal accident. so close, so much close that I can see her facial expression of " Oh God, we are coming to you, please bless us" . I don't know How I turn the steering so quick and so precise, but that accident was avoided some How. If both cars collided that day. that was very bad situation for me. Worst for a family in that car. After that Day I never ever Drunk and Drive. Either party at my Home or at my friends Home. But no drink and drive. Stay where You are after consuming alcohol. Edit : So I wrote about this incident about why moose test is necessary and why cars should perform well in this test. Because this incident was like a exam of moose test, Non of you guys ask about moose test performance of Wagon R LXI 2008. But start discussing Alcohol Brand, few of you suggest alcohol causes fluent reaction timing. But forgot may be if I was not drunk , This compromising situation wouldn't be there at all . So about moose test drive, cars performance is heavily influenced by driver inputs ( braking, Steering ), Input sensitivity, Tyre and Air Pressure in tyres and on Physical Dynamics of car. So That 2008 wagon R passed the moose test situation very well.
So this is why Tata cars end up with more accudents. Better handling/confident is more important than the star rating. Almost all auto journalists agree with this point.
There are more tincans maruti suzuki cars accidents than tata cars. The ratio of accidents of tincans maruti to tata is 3:1. Out of every 9 minutes in India, one is maruti suzuki car. That's because of no stability, no handling, no confidence in maruti suzuki cars. And fyi, the moose test is included in new GNCAP norms when nexon, harrier, safari were tested and they did well, that's why they achieved 5 stars easily, you can check in GNCAP of safri or harrier or nexon. You fail to give a valid argument and you've been caught spreading false explanation.
@@Heisenberg8307 school boy. even as per your stats( must be learned from whatsapp/facebook) mauti cars are more than 3 times when compared with tata cars. This means that definitely tata cars are not confident/better handling cars.
@@subramanip8434child, as per your lies, maruti sells 2 times more than of tata. I knew you would give me that sales comparison. Yet, the ratio is 3:1 against tata cars in accidents. That implies the unstability of tincans due to featherweight nature with horrible steering response which you avoid to count in plus the tincan build quality with pathetic structural rigidity. You just spread nonsense because you hate tata cars and you're sponsored by marutin or hyundie.
@@subramanip8434 th-cam.com/video/75-PjV7NAfU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=FR2wBlOCvG8uFhD3 i have shared you a link on how tata nexon was included in Moose test by GNCAP and it came out good and passed the test, watch near the end of the video, this is a concrete proof, unlike your unbaked story of lies and negativity.
@@TheGreatMarathaArmyyou're so called real SUV like the safari and harrier can't even go offroad and everyone who's actually educated knows that jimny is a better offroader compared to thar and that's why europeans use jimmy for rock crawling in case if you don't know
@@Realntrutheell that applies to the indian versions only, the global one's are safer. And actually the jimny is global spec so it gets 3 star euro NCAP so it's like 5 star GNCAP cause euro NCAP is the bestwhen it's about safety standards
@@Manas_4real There's a simple logic behind it, Jimmy is lightweight and it's engine has sufficient power. That's why it can do it easily. But trust me it's not an SUV, Jimmy is the most failed product of Maruti Suzuki in decade. Zero safety, cheap price and Tin metal body put on a chasis, nothing else. Safari, Harrier don't comes under same category of Jimmy, Thar does. Everyone know how capable Thar is, indeed it's a true suv.
Once I was driving on NE3 in my Verna at around 95 almost no traffic. Suddenly a bike turned straight from left shoulder towards right lane. And I actually steered similar to this. Somehow nothing bad happened. That day I thought I’ll keep my car long enough. What stability Verna 🔥🔥🔥
@@DhSK.22 That’s your view. Maybe you never drove Verna. I drove City , it has better comfort but lacks high speed stability in comparison to Verna. About VW, I have heard a lot but never driven one so can’t comment.
It has nothing to do with Suzuki or Mahindra but ground clearance. Swift is a hatchback with less ground clearance and less length so the body roll will be less. Jimny has more body roll than the Swift. A Tata Tiago will perform similar to the swift. Only difference, replace the VLC players with concrete wall and if the swift hits it during the test , it's squashed watermelon.
In the end, the Jeep wrangler, man although it was so big it is just amazing to see how amazingly it performed compared to smaller ones like Thar & Jimny!
What's wrong with the thumbnail? Where's the click bait? Did they say Indian cars passed the moose test? Everyone & anyone thinks they are an expert in all things cars.
No doubt the kind of punishment given to the vehicles would rarely be encountered in normal driving conditions.But it would be a great comfort to be in a vehicle which is capable of rising to the occasion when the need arises.This test is therefore a welcome eye opener which every vehicle owner must be aware about.
These situations happen more than you can imagine. Just because you’re a city driver who doesn’t drive more than 60 kmph doesn’t mean rest of the Indians drive same like you. And these tests are even more important than crash tests.
I don't restrict my speed to 60 km at all times.when an open stretch is seen it is pedal to metal.the point is car tests should include moose or slalom test also as part of testing.
We buy road vehicles and not go carting vehicles nor dash cars like in essel world. Driver's greatest help while driving a vehicle is how well controllable it is and how it responds to various road conditions and still provide controllability. No driver thinks of having commiting accident and then chances of survival while driving a car.
Claiming Maruti cars as tincans etc...is just a marketing jibe from all other car manufacturers to lower Maruti's sale..this only happen in india. Elsewhere in world , suzuki vehicles are still among best
Skeletal architecture is not exactly same, indian variants have lesser body weight. So stability might not be the same. My Baleno shakes slightly in the highways at 100kph+ with wind
@@vinay-chaudhary_07 both have failed but the rear passengers in jimny will survive when the car rolls over but not in Thar because there is no safety for rear passengers in thar.
@@KuldK-m9k # Yahan safety wala point kahan se aa gaya ab.. Baat to moose test ki ho rahi hai. Aur jab rollover ho jaayegi to fir kya fayda test ka stability check karne ka. Aur ab ye mat bolna ki sedan nahi hai suv hai Pehle jaa kar jeep compass ka test check kar le TH-cam par. Suv with stability kya hota hai pata chal jayega
For the uninitiated, this is a mandatory test outside because of animal crash related deaths and that is why those cars are specially built accordingly. Testing Indian spec for this test is a surprise for the car because it wasn't built for that
What do you mean Indian cars are not built for that? In Europe they do moose test coz of moose suddenly appearing on the road and suddenly crossing the road. Here in India, we may not have moose but we have people suddenly crossing the roads. Then there's cow, dogs, goats.
I was interested Mahindra Thar ... eeeks ! ... Jeep Rubicon ... wow ! ... but again to be fair both were tested on two different tracks/tests ... would've been nice to see both were compared on the same test/track.
Mahindra SUVs love to topple over. Scorpio classic is tall and narrow, tends to topple over when suddenly changing lanes at high speed. Then there's Thar. Thar 3-door is sub-4 meter SUV with very tall height. That's why it performs poorly in this test. A tall SUV needs proper width between wheel track and proper length to maintain stability. That's why ScorpioN, Safari Storme, Fortuner, Endeavour are all stable SUVs. Scorpio classic and Thar 3-door are death on wheels. Even the Wrangler 3-door is 4.3 meters in length.
Swift performed exceptionally well , Thar's performance was worst, now you can understand why thar has so many accidents. It is very unstable at high speed. It was designed as offroad vehicle but people use it as city car.
In my opinion , They have high ground clearance and are prone to rollovers. They drive as fast as those sedans and hatchback in the highway, so it is more necessary to test them than those low centre of gravity cars. Even if they fail the moose test, it's still a good test to know if it's prone to rollover.
Heres my story of real world moose test: vehical: honda amaze 2020 model. Im from india, ap. I am driving and my dad is sitting next to me. Its on a 40 feet bypass road, we are traveling at near about 70-80 km. Suddenly a paseenger bus coming head-on and i swiftly took left and steered it back to right, to my shock down is a slide dragged me below road level if our grip is poor we would have ended in a water cannal. Luckly i have controlled the car and got the car back on road. The next movement we both were shocked and to my dads surprise i said to him that this vehical is not producing enough pickup. Though its a coverup i made. My dad litterly felt frustrated and said to drive slow in a commanding tone. From then onwards i started to drive safe and maintain safe distance between vehicles.. thank god that was so immature and at the same time so much exciting that i had the best save.
These kinds of test basically emulate the kind of scenarios you would face even in city roads when you weave in & out of the traffic in a brazen attempt to overtake. This effect is obviously more pronounced at higher speeds where you would lose control & topple over..... Thar is most likely to topple over due it's high CG. Stay away from such vehicles trying to do these kinds of tricks on the road. They would cause lot more collateral damage.
First half of video is unclear...camera positions are not apt..second half seems stitched from a European video with more pro track and camera positions
Suzuki failed the test since skid cannot be considered. I guess the contact patch is too small and it would need more tyre width for moose test. All the vehicles have a lower tyre width except the Nexon.
These tests should mandatory in India because it’s unfair for Tata cars to score 5 star rating according to their cars because they still feel unsafe while driving on highway.
That’s more about drivers than cars. If the cars behave well when we drive them and act like a moose under yr steering control, then it’s yr driving issue.
Don't look at the moose test of Euro spec vehicles and consider them equivalent to Indian spec cars. If you try that with Indian spec Swift for example, things will end badly for the car.
So why only American Jeep considered. This video agenda is to show. Jeep is better than Thar which looks the same. Yeah Scorpio handled better from all
but bro front wheel drive is bad in this situations cuz their rear wheel skits while turning your wheel on high speed and ya i am shocked swift did well 🤯
I clicked on the video and first read the comments and thought its some serious issue then i watched the whole video and got to know that this video has dumbest people commenting on dumbest things.😂
Fun Fact: All these tests are performed at 60-70kmph (just as crash test) While still performing poor, beyond 60-70kmph, TATA/Mahindra are certainly "Cruising Coffins". Save your loved ones from buying Tata/Mahindra.🙏
Thar's performance is very dangerous. Toyota Hilux also faced the same issue but they fixed it . Mahindra should start working on it and learn a thing or two from TOYOTA.
We are paying so much Road tax and what not to get substandard unsafe cars.. And manufacturers are forced to sell unequipped cars cuz of high taxes levied.. Gadkari u ***
Bhai Tata Mahindra tho tum India mein sel hone wala model select kar liya jab duniya ki Sabse badi froad company ki Bari hai to tumne unke Europe ke model utha liye use kar liya tumne Maruti Suzuki is duniya ki Sabse halki gadi banati hai kahin Aisa Na Ho ki thoda time bad isko cycle se bhi halki kar de 😂
![ILLSLICK - THE KING'S LANDING [Freestyle]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/feIJJnNkTfk/mqdefault.jpg)
I remember once I was Drunk, returning from my friends home. it was Dusk, I was Driving 2008 Wagon R LXI.
Traffic was moderate, I was chilling around 60 kmph.
A red Suzuki swift was taking U-Turn, from my right to left side. Driver with two kids and Driver's Wife was in the Swift.
When The lady in the red car saw Wagon R coming to almost about to hit their car on the left rear. She freaked out and almost Died,
Our cars was so close to be in fatal accident. so close, so much close that I can see her facial expression of " Oh God, we are coming to you, please bless us" . I don't know How I turn the steering so quick and so precise, but that accident was avoided some How.
If both cars collided that day. that was very bad situation for me. Worst for a family in that car.
After that Day I never ever Drunk and Drive. Either party at my Home or at my friends Home. But no drink and drive. Stay where You are after consuming alcohol.
Edit : So I wrote about this incident about why moose test is necessary and why cars should perform well in this test. Because this incident was like a exam of moose test, Non of you guys ask about moose test performance of Wagon R LXI 2008.
But start discussing Alcohol Brand, few of you suggest alcohol causes fluent reaction timing. But forgot may be if I was not drunk , This compromising situation wouldn't be there at all .
So about moose test drive, cars performance is heavily influenced by driver inputs ( braking, Steering ), Input sensitivity, Tyre and Air Pressure in tyres and on Physical Dynamics of car.
So That 2008 wagon R passed the moose test situation very well.
If there is a collision then you won't have access to internet to share your thoughts. I too party at home only.
Which brand my bro?
Brand matters 😊@@jayeshmonlbs
Good that you learned your lesson.
You should be jailed.
So this is why Tata cars end up with more accudents. Better handling/confident is more important than the star rating. Almost all auto journalists agree with this point.
There are more tincans maruti suzuki cars accidents than tata cars. The ratio of accidents of tincans maruti to tata is 3:1. Out of every 9 minutes in India, one is maruti suzuki car. That's because of no stability, no handling, no confidence in maruti suzuki cars. And fyi, the moose test is included in new GNCAP norms when nexon, harrier, safari were tested and they did well, that's why they achieved 5 stars easily, you can check in GNCAP of safri or harrier or nexon. You fail to give a valid argument and you've been caught spreading false explanation.
@@Heisenberg8307 school boy. even as per your stats( must be learned from whatsapp/facebook) mauti cars are more than 3 times when compared with tata cars. This means that definitely tata cars are not confident/better handling cars.
@@subramanip8434child, as per your lies, maruti sells 2 times more than of tata. I knew you would give me that sales comparison. Yet, the ratio is 3:1 against tata cars in accidents. That implies the unstability of tincans due to featherweight nature with horrible steering response which you avoid to count in plus the tincan build quality with pathetic structural rigidity. You just spread nonsense because you hate tata cars and you're sponsored by marutin or hyundie.
@@subramanip8434 th-cam.com/video/75-PjV7NAfU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=FR2wBlOCvG8uFhD3
i have shared you a link on how tata nexon was included in Moose test by GNCAP and it came out good and passed the test, watch near the end of the video, this is a concrete proof, unlike your unbaked story of lies and negativity.
@@subramanip8434yup, no. of maruticar which are on the road is higher than tata so ofc they will be in an accident more
New Scorpio-N felt very stable for a big SUV. And Kudos for Nexon for awesome performance for a compact SUV. It felt better than Ecosports finally.
Why only maruti cars doing the real moose test? Thar did very poor, bounce like a ball and almost roll over😧
Halka kabad was not meant to leave ground...... other suv are heavy,it's supposed to happen.
Moose test me pass and crash test me fail😂😂😂
@@TheGreatMarathaArmyyou're so called real SUV like the safari and harrier can't even go offroad and everyone who's actually educated knows that jimny is a better offroader compared to thar and that's why europeans use jimmy for rock crawling in case if you don't know
@@Realntrutheell that applies to the indian versions only, the global one's are safer. And actually the jimny is global spec so it gets 3 star euro NCAP so it's like 5 star GNCAP cause euro NCAP is the bestwhen it's about safety standards
@@Manas_4real There's a simple logic behind it, Jimmy is lightweight and it's engine has sufficient power. That's why it can do it easily. But trust me it's not an SUV, Jimmy is the most failed product of Maruti Suzuki in decade.
Zero safety, cheap price and Tin metal body put on a chasis, nothing else.
Safari, Harrier don't comes under same category of Jimmy, Thar does. Everyone know how capable Thar is, indeed it's a true suv.
Once I was driving on NE3 in my Verna at around 95 almost no traffic. Suddenly a bike turned straight from left shoulder towards right lane. And I actually steered similar to this. Somehow nothing bad happened. That day I thought I’ll keep my car long enough. What stability Verna 🔥🔥🔥
@@DhSK.22 That’s your view. Maybe you never drove Verna. I drove City , it has better comfort but lacks high speed stability in comparison to Verna. About VW, I have heard a lot but never driven one so can’t comment.
@@DhSK.22 Verna has better stability than City
Swift has initial d skills
I was amazed by swift performance ❤
Now you realise that the Thar is a Jeep gone wrong. Also, for all Suzuki safety lovers, they stayed in the road better than the Tata's or Mahindras.
Hahaha suzuki breaks just before.
yet it will kill you at the end of the day
It has nothing to do with Suzuki or Mahindra but ground clearance. Swift is a hatchback with less ground clearance and less length so the body roll will be less. Jimny has more body roll than the Swift.
A Tata Tiago will perform similar to the swift.
Only difference, replace the VLC players with concrete wall and if the swift hits it during the test , it's squashed watermelon.
Thar is copy pasted by a woman designer. Probably concentrated more on cosmetics than weight distribution
Thar is not jeep gone wrong. Thar is jeep gone affordable. Take 10 min and think.
Nexon was like "sorry bro, i slept through . Did something happen?"
I tell you what, we had a similar situation and did a full 360°
This not real moose test
Real moose test multiple cone to go thru in a zig zag pattern
Nexon 😂😂😂
Look at the Lovely Swift. It does it so swiftly ❤
In the end, the Jeep wrangler, man although it was so big it is just amazing to see how amazingly it performed compared to smaller ones like Thar & Jimny!
Despite click bait title I still agree most new Indian cars are really bad for moose test... Too much gc and really bad cornering ability.
What's wrong with the thumbnail? Where's the click bait? Did they say Indian cars passed the moose test? Everyone & anyone thinks they are an expert in all things cars.
Buddy you must be drivng a hyper car like a bugattu to say that all cars performed bad in moose test.
Just try benz m class
Thank heavens we don't have moose in India? I suppose
@@Rohitgavai46 They must be going to Canada to find Mooses for testing no.
Km77 moose test is worth considering, because its done by Human not a machine
For altroz, they don't need to test as it's just a walk in the park.
No doubt the kind of punishment given to the vehicles would rarely be encountered in normal driving conditions.But it would be a great comfort to be in a vehicle which is capable of rising to the occasion when the need arises.This test is therefore a welcome eye opener which every vehicle owner must be aware about.
These situations happen more than you can imagine. Just because you’re a city driver who doesn’t drive more than 60 kmph doesn’t mean rest of the Indians drive same like you.
And these tests are even more important than crash tests.
I don't restrict my speed to 60 km at all times.when an open stretch is seen it is pedal to metal.the point is car tests should include moose or slalom test also as part of testing.
Jimny and Wrangler did it surprisingly really well despite having solid axles front and rear and body on frame construction
Moose test can be workout for saloons like virtus, verna, rapid, city, slavia like that
We buy road vehicles and not go carting vehicles nor dash cars like in essel world. Driver's greatest help while driving a vehicle is how well controllable it is and how it responds to various road conditions and still provide controllability. No driver thinks of having commiting accident and then chances of survival while driving a car.
Claiming Maruti cars as tincans etc...is just a marketing jibe from all other car manufacturers to lower Maruti's sale..this only happen in india. Elsewhere in world , suzuki vehicles are still among best
all suzuki models shown in this video are not of indian market.
Correct
Skeletal architecture is still the same so they handle the same
Skeletal architecture is not exactly same, indian variants have lesser body weight. So stability might not be the same. My Baleno shakes slightly in the highways at 100kph+ with wind
@@vigneshht2917 their lighter weight makes them easier to manoeuvre
I think, Lightweight and hatchback cars performed well......big bulky SUV find it hard to control the roll.
Wrangler did way better than any Indian suvs
The jimny performed waay better than the chapri thar
It's a 3 door jimny
@@thejimnydreamz yes it is
Kyu faltu baat kar raha hai
Dono hi fail hai test main
@@vinay-chaudhary_07 both have failed but the rear passengers in jimny will survive when the car rolls over but not in Thar because there is no safety for rear passengers in thar.
@@KuldK-m9k # Yahan safety wala point kahan se aa gaya ab..
Baat to moose test ki ho rahi hai.
Aur jab rollover ho jaayegi to fir kya fayda test ka stability check karne ka.
Aur ab ye mat bolna ki sedan nahi hai suv hai
Pehle jaa kar jeep compass ka test check kar le TH-cam par.
Suv with stability kya hota hai pata chal jayega
Broad and Low clearance car is always a good choice for high g forcing corners...
Ignis is not bad although.
Nearly as good as the American brand at mid 60s
Thar is jumping like a spring.. seems unsafe. Swift is great. Safety is always not heavier built, it lies is with design also
For the uninitiated, this is a mandatory test outside because of animal crash related deaths and that is why those cars are specially built accordingly. Testing Indian spec for this test is a surprise for the car because it wasn't built for that
What do you mean Indian cars are not built for that? In Europe they do moose test coz of moose suddenly appearing on the road and suddenly crossing the road. Here in India, we may not have moose but we have people suddenly crossing the roads. Then there's cow, dogs, goats.
I was interested Mahindra Thar ... eeeks ! ... Jeep Rubicon ... wow ! ...
but again to be fair both were tested on two different tracks/tests ... would've been nice to see both were compared on the same test/track.
Mahindra SUVs love to topple over. Scorpio classic is tall and narrow, tends to topple over when suddenly changing lanes at high speed. Then there's Thar. Thar 3-door is sub-4 meter SUV with very tall height. That's why it performs poorly in this test.
A tall SUV needs proper width between wheel track and proper length to maintain stability. That's why ScorpioN, Safari Storme, Fortuner, Endeavour are all stable SUVs. Scorpio classic and Thar 3-door are death on wheels.
Even the Wrangler 3-door is 4.3 meters in length.
Swift performed exceptionally well ,
Thar's performance was worst, now you can understand why thar has so many accidents. It is very unstable at high speed. It was designed as offroad vehicle but people use it as city car.
That swift in the test 🔥
India is a big market
Indian companies make lot of money they should also provide good products
Please make one on sedans
Where is the Jazz acing the moose test like a true blue pro😊
First of don't understand why all SUV and MUV are selected for a moose test? Are they really for moose test? Even Ford SUV are failed
R u stupid?
Because of high ground clearance in stock and how stable they are given that setting.
Yes even Prado will fail
Defender will fail too
Yes these suv will go on expressway too thats why they are tested
In my opinion , They have high ground clearance and are prone to rollovers. They drive as fast as those sedans and hatchback in the highway, so it is more necessary to test them than those low centre of gravity cars. Even if they fail the moose test, it's still a good test to know if it's prone to rollover.
Heres my story of real world moose test: vehical: honda amaze 2020 model. Im from india, ap. I am driving and my dad is sitting next to me. Its on a 40 feet bypass road, we are traveling at near about 70-80 km. Suddenly a paseenger bus coming head-on and i swiftly took left and steered it back to right, to my shock down is a slide dragged me below road level if our grip is poor we would have ended in a water cannal. Luckly i have controlled the car and got the car back on road. The next movement we both were shocked and to my dads surprise i said to him that this vehical is not producing enough pickup. Though its a coverup i made. My dad litterly felt frustrated and said to drive slow in a commanding tone. From then onwards i started to drive safe and maintain safe distance between vehicles.. thank god that was so immature and at the same time so much exciting that i had the best save.
Good to hear that your driving reflexes and God saved you and Papa. When it comes to safety, sedans always score more points than SUVs. 😊
@@throttlething thank you for replying ji. i sub to your channel. all the best to produce good content.
Xuv 700 was not moose test but stability test by ncap, where it scored 5 stars
Indian specs vs international specs??????
Nexon jas perfomed better even with highr GC
3:05 what is the vehicle company ?
It’s EU spec Jimny from Suzuki.
Did the safari do good ?
It failed.....SUVs are not that stable like a sedan or a hatchback
In moose test showing SUZUKI swift which is a global product not maruti swift
Well we don't have moose in India...BTW what's a moose test??
Since "Moosewala" died in his car this test was introduced......
These kinds of test basically emulate the kind of scenarios you would face even in city roads when you weave in & out of the traffic in a brazen attempt to overtake. This effect is obviously more pronounced at higher speeds where you would lose control & topple over.....
Thar is most likely to topple over due it's high CG. Stay away from such vehicles trying to do these kinds of tricks on the road. They would cause lot more collateral damage.
So proved mahindra is giving us cheap copy of an American jeep
Swift surprised me ❤
First half of video is unclear...camera positions are not apt..second half seems stitched from a European video with more pro track and camera positions
Suzuki failed the test since skid cannot be considered. I guess the contact patch is too small and it would need more tyre width for moose test.
All the vehicles have a lower tyre width except the Nexon.
Light weight plastic cans dont have much weight to pullover…..only real metal has weight pulling outwards
No point in only making the car wobble by abrupt steering movement if it does not change direction to avoid anything!!
The background music is the best
These tests should mandatory in India because it’s unfair for Tata cars to score 5 star rating according to their cars because they still feel unsafe while driving on highway.
Aa for the thar some of us do like the tilt with wheels in the air.
Please test Tata altroz diesel stability ....
Hatchbacks can actually perform well....do not worry......
Jeep Compass will perform veey good on Moose Test
Different cars made for different purposes, one test fits them all? City car, cruzer, off roader, sports, climber!
Jeep and thar might look alike but Damn the difference between thar and jeep
Yes big difference in price as well FYI.
The wrangler is king for a reason 😊
Kindly check indian built suzuki cars not other country built vehicles..
That’s more about drivers than cars. If the cars behave well when we drive them and act like a moose under yr steering control, then it’s yr driving issue.
Jeep suv in indian market can do this
Don't look at the moose test of Euro spec vehicles and consider them equivalent to Indian spec cars.
If you try that with Indian spec Swift for example, things will end badly for the car.
Swift performance 🔥🔥
most of them are suv and we alll know suv and off road vehicles are not gonna perform good on moose test because of there height
So why only American Jeep considered.
This video agenda is to show. Jeep is better than Thar which looks the same.
Yeah Scorpio handled better from all
when it comes to Indian vehicles , better keep them under 100 and be conservative in driving.
That 3-door Jimny is not sold in India.
This made me realise, does Mahindra only makes SUVs?
SUVs and fake SUVs (like 300 400 and 3xo)
@@drbaxisnayak703 and copy "offroader" (Thar)
Swift is mind blowing..
Yes because some of them are front wheel drive sad and the break disck are only on front
I agree 👍🏻
but bro front wheel drive is bad in this situations cuz their rear wheel skits while turning your wheel on high speed and ya i am shocked swift did well 🤯
I clicked on the video and first read the comments and thought its some serious issue then i watched the whole video and got to know that this video has dumbest people commenting on dumbest things.😂
Many fail to see the jeep hit 4 cones at 71 km/hr while swift glazes with 0 cones in 77km /hr.
Indian cars par excellent.
Let's call it a cow test. Now we know which cars are good to avoid cows suddenly on a highway
Even though Suzuki performance and chassis is way poor than the competition at handling it is boon for the customers🤔
Why MAHINDRA & TATA performed in empty roads n not in red barriers 😂
Force GURKHA missing
Why XUV 700 was shot at few KM away during the test 😅😅😅
Cause that was Indian car and performed well these guys want there Suzuki Toyota to sell more
Fun Fact: All these tests are performed at 60-70kmph (just as crash test)
While still performing poor, beyond 60-70kmph, TATA/Mahindra are certainly "Cruising Coffins".
Save your loved ones from buying Tata/Mahindra.🙏
Tatas and Thar: very poor handling. Jimny is okayish
Virtus ko bhi lao
Scorpion is jhula gadi 😂
Scorpio N ❤❤
Try doing that in a tractor..😂😂😂
Even great cars fail the Moose test.
XUV700 👌👌
Xuv 300 performed better than Nexon. Not surprised
Thar's performance is very dangerous.
Toyota Hilux also faced the same issue but they fixed it .
Mahindra should start working on it and learn a thing or two from TOYOTA.
Driver skill is also required, the one who drove swift was best.
Most of the SUVs doing badly in Moose test.
hyundai /Honda/skoda moose kings
nexon is beast
No use Showing this to Thar lovers because they won't understand what's going on here.
We are paying so much Road tax and what not to get substandard unsafe cars.. And manufacturers are forced to sell unequipped cars cuz of high taxes levied.. Gadkari u ***
Jimmy and Swift ain't Indian cars they Japanese now Suzuki owns more than 80%
thar is far
Unneeded snake background music ! LoL
XUV300 ate it like nothing
Xuv700
Scorpio n 🗿
Swift and Jimny and other Suzuki shown here are not India spec cars...they are completely rubbish in India
Tata cars best
Xuv3XO
Bhai Tata Mahindra tho tum India mein sel hone wala model select kar liya jab duniya ki Sabse badi froad company ki Bari hai to tumne unke Europe ke model utha liye use kar liya tumne Maruti Suzuki is duniya ki Sabse halki gadi banati hai kahin Aisa Na Ho ki thoda time bad isko cycle se bhi halki kar de 😂