The Predictive Brain: Rethinking Perception, Emotion, and Dreams with Anil Seth

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • Anil Seth explains "controlled hallucinations" and how the predictive brain approach can reframe our understanding of perception, emotion, and dreams.
    Dr. Anil Seth is Professor of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience at the University of Sussex and the Editor in Chief of the Oxford Academic journal Neuroscience of Consciousness.
    More clips: More clips: • Anil Seth Interview: T...
    Full interview: / ihmcurious
    You can get Anil's books and audiobooks through these Amazon Affiliate links (I will get a small commission at no cost to you to support the channel)
    Being You: A New Science of Consciousness amzn.to/3wPcVya
    30-Second Brain: amzn.to/3wPcVya
    Chapters
    0:00: The Predictive Brain
    2:21: Reframing Perception: Controlled Hallucination
    3:53: Reframing Emotion
    6:34: The Free Energy Principle
    10:17: Wobbly Footbridge Study
    13:36: Dreams

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @theWinterWalker
    @theWinterWalker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    As an autistic, I'm enthralled by the predictive brain model, bc as anyone with autism can tell you, SURPRISED is an understatement when interacting with NTs.😂
    Eta I LOVE ANIL SETH, him VS Ramachandra, and Robert Sapolsky are my superhero's.
    Side note I'm becoming increasingly intrigued by Michael Levin's research at Tufts.

  • @grivza
    @grivza 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That last point about dreams fits so well. It's really interesting how we can give interpretations of a process at different levels of abstraction and they can all make sense without sharing any obvious common ground or mapping to each other.

  • @josephc8440
    @josephc8440 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Such a great TH-cam channel!

  • @gdavis9296
    @gdavis9296 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This channel is already so good. Thank you for the epic content

  • @Sunneyred
    @Sunneyred 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great videos, with a better thumbnail and title im positive they would reach more people and you deserve to grow with how good these videos are!

  • @GeoffryGifari
    @GeoffryGifari 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dr Seth is just easy to listen to...

  • @peterlin5145
    @peterlin5145 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    awesome!

  • @360.Tapestry
    @360.Tapestry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    not that i am encouraging unethical studies, but ethics is one of the main reasons we don't understand human behavior and cognition to the same degree that we understand many other things

    • @morplagro1545
      @morplagro1545 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ll agree haha, there have been some pretty interesting nature Vs nurtures done, trying to teach dolphins to speak 😂, raising a chip in a human environment, when reading up on them you always learn a lot

  • @user-if1ly5sn5f
    @user-if1ly5sn5f 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The body meets everything or a portion of it and the dimensions share the understanding of what it takes to be and it’s more than the outlines. That’s why we don’t judge a book by the cover or believe in only the outlines. People aren’t just one thing, we travel through and as things sharing. The body meets the universe and the differences share to reveal between or expand it too and that’s why nothingness shares everything, only nothing could be everything. Math is a reflection of this because 0 is the infinite and absence. 0x anything doesn’t take away and make 0, what is something when multiplied by everything? It’s not something but it is everything. That’s why 1 reflects as a beginning, no insides but the blank like a baby but when it starts expanding then differences reveal. The insides of 1 or what make it are also the outsides just shaped a little different. Like perspective in a non Euclidean dimension. The distance from the beginning to the end is no distance but through difference we see distance.

  • @kaorudragneel8498
    @kaorudragneel8498 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Social psychology mentioned 😋

  • @terrydactyl2077
    @terrydactyl2077 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do I start to understand what prediction error means? Looking online and still stumped.

    • @ihmcurious
      @ihmcurious  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is a good start: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_coding

    • @terrydactyl2077
      @terrydactyl2077 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ihmcurious thank you so much!

  • @user-if1ly5sn5f
    @user-if1ly5sn5f 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve got a lot of comments because I’ve come to understand a lot on what you’re speaking of. Self reflection with humility and honesty reveals what’s behind the outlines. Like our senses outline but people started believing in that stuff like good and evil and a single entity of god when in reality, the pressures share to reveal so all things are but time is the difference. When we expand we align with our current, think habitat to survive and eat and live. Then we expand into more dimensions and cross them using math and science to reveal technology which is just a farther relative of reality we had to find. Like deeper within the dimensions. Like Rubik’s cubes expanding and revealing things between. That’s why we can expand faster and faster with the more we understand and entangle with/share dimensions. People don’t reflect honestly so our third eye is closed. Nobody can even be honest with themselves because the self isn’t ours alone, it was shared by the differences.

    • @patrickl5290
      @patrickl5290 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It sounds like your trying to say something interesting. Would you mind rewording it so I can understand better?

    • @user-if1ly5sn5f
      @user-if1ly5sn5f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@patrickl5290 sorry it’s hard to arrange all the thoughts because without context they sound crazy. Our sensory tools such as eyes and ears take in measurements and cross them, like entanglement but through the relative. So our body as a baby comes out with the relatives from the mother and father but no experience which is why babies move and look and stuff, they are entangling and gaining the measurements. The problem is that when we grow we get told these measurements are real and the things not present are unreal but when you look at time you see that it’s not a force but an outline of changes. It’s not a thing but revealed by many. Same thing that happened to us happened to the universe, as it changes, the outlines box it in or the entanglement creates a habitat that restricts because the measurements but it’s not fully restricted. The human body and mind does change but people are confused about evolution and such changes. It’s not hard to understand that we are not just the body but the outlines we see and form ourselves but that’s also a problem because we think that is what’s real so we think backwards. All things are real just divided but sharing which reveals the measurement of time or measurements.
      I may have lost the point. The human body is 1 and the infinite shares by relativity. Maybe we are just shifting in what was already, like all points are connected but as we box ourselves in, it gets harder to see what’s between these outlines. Just like the human identity between what we are and all the other stuff. It’s a lot to share but it’s like we all share the lies instead of infinite and then we think the lies are true. We lie to ourselves like when we think the drugs bring happiness or someone we thought loved us was tricking us and we kinda just didn’t listen to the red flags our conscious shares. We hide from reality because it’s all real and people don’t know how and that’s like saying idk and then people don’t listen after that. It’s more like there is no single everything. The brain crosses dimensions and reveals potential, we search out the paths and we see how missing measurements leads to different lives and the media and influencers are false idols sharing lies that don’t change things. That’s hell, when things don’t change and it just rots. The human takes now instead of sharing the consciousness with the infinite. We search in the words we listen to instead of accepting differences. It’s like we say oh we’re inclusive but then when we share it’s the opposite because it’s all lies, nobody is embodying the things they say they are, everyone is lost. They don’t see what’s between the lines. Like Jesus shared good right and taught wisdom but people didn’t really see outside of it, they never listened so when he shared his passing so they could see what wasn’t there anymore. To see what was missing between when he was and when he wasn’t and so we could be the change that he shared. Jesus didn’t only believe in a god, he believed in the word god, everything. Everything cannot be in the same place at once so all our different perspectives matter.

    • @user-if1ly5sn5f
      @user-if1ly5sn5f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@patrickl5290 honestly i use the ai to translate what i say because it’s hard to keep up with what i see and think.

    • @patrickl5290
      @patrickl5290 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@user-if1ly5sn5fyou may want to calm down and look these comments over. They do not make much sense, as they reference phrases you clearly have your own definition for e.g. “through the relative.” Can you try again?

    • @user-if1ly5sn5f
      @user-if1ly5sn5f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@patrickl5290 don’t let your ego talk for you big dog. You just don’t know how to listen without searching. Good luck 👍