Radiation 101: What It Is, Why It's Dangerous

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 104

  • @spookybruv421
    @spookybruv421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    She explained it to us like we are all dumb assess.... which we are.

    • @justtellingthetruth8686
      @justtellingthetruth8686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      That's why we're here

    • @iamwarranted4502
      @iamwarranted4502 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@justtellingthetruth8686 same

    • @adelfavillarin3825
      @adelfavillarin3825 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What about radiation thru internet like playing games the whole day please explane well how it effect to our body

    • @restfulcube-notyet
      @restfulcube-notyet ปีที่แล้ว

      stop trying to learn something new fellow dumbash

    • @dagothodros641
      @dagothodros641 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Definitely all trump voters

  • @factorvracing
    @factorvracing 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    I built special weapons from 1971-1974 in the Army and have radiation burns and sores from radiation exposure. My DNA was changed. The military does not recognize effects from radiation when I served so I am trying to become the first to change their rules.

  • @royrice8597
    @royrice8597 5 ปีที่แล้ว +163

    Alpha= “A”ll right. Beta = “B”e careful. Gamma and X-ray= “G”et away and “X”it immediately.!! A good rule of thumb!

    • @bjornegan6421
      @bjornegan6421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Neutron=NOPE

    • @estimatingonediscoveringthree
      @estimatingonediscoveringthree 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What’s the acronym from neutron beam? Fukushima

    • @kha0s616
      @kha0s616 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is so good 😂😂😂

    • @sternd22
      @sternd22 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is this a joke?

  • @John14-6...
    @John14-6... 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Finally! Very well explained. It only took about an hour of watching different TH-cam videos to get an overall simplified explanation for me to put it all together. Most videos give a good explanation on one area but leave something out

    • @ceezb5629
      @ceezb5629 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly. I think most people try to overdramatize to get views.
      Radiation is already scary enough of a subject, no need to dramatize.
      This doctor or scientist did a phenomenal job.

  • @jasondewitt9660
    @jasondewitt9660 8 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    The first electricity detective....Sherlock Ohms

  • @rockforlight
    @rockforlight 5 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Thank you for this. It was difficult to find a video on this subject which features someone who is educated in the subject. So many clickbait "armchair" science videos on TH-cam.

    • @ceezb5629
      @ceezb5629 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly. I think most people try to overdramatize to get views.
      Radiation is already scary enough of a subject, no need to dramatize.
      This doctor or scientist did a phenomenal job.

    • @grzesiek1x
      @grzesiek1x ปีที่แล้ว +1

      exactly!

  • @jonnybravo4322
    @jonnybravo4322 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Here because of the HBO show “chernoble”

    • @mdb1010
      @mdb1010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ghostlylover99123 It's you're*, don't give up either. You're almost there! Until then I'd hold off on trying to correct others spelling lol.

  • @VegetaUnv7
    @VegetaUnv7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Haha im glad im not the only one. Every video of trying to find out what radiation is would turn into a physics lesson .

    • @tommytwotone81
      @tommytwotone81 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I imagine that there are people who are scientists in other fields of science, who would still need someone to explain it like this for them to understand it. It doesn't make anybody dumb.

  • @kellyrish5092
    @kellyrish5092 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    THANK YOU! This actually makes so much sense and helps me understand. Very very helpful

  • @parabellum4622
    @parabellum4622 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow... I'm learning radiation and a physics from a Doctor. I'm loving this. My brain is open.

  • @royrice8597
    @royrice8597 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Radioactive cigarettes, Now I know smoking is hazardous to your health and why I don’t smoke!!

    • @nothing2see315
      @nothing2see315 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's not there naturally

    • @samuele8361
      @samuele8361 ปีที่แล้ว

      believe it or not the polonium 210 that's inside a cigarette is likely not what is going to cause cancer. There's plenty of more effective carcinogens inside tobacco.

  • @zoecanizares1007
    @zoecanizares1007 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How come positive energy does damage to your cells?

  • @brettd2318
    @brettd2318 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Really nicely explained, cheers.

  • @rajinikanthrajini3247
    @rajinikanthrajini3247 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Clear madam. Thanks. Straight to the point.

  • @paulanderson79
    @paulanderson79 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *1:44 for molecule read atom.

  • @zypheralexander837
    @zypheralexander837 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about fire alarm systems in close proximity.people are getting sick all around us

  • @זאביגורוב
    @זאביגורוב 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great and simple explanation

  • @skipsassy1
    @skipsassy1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    tell that to the Chernobyl graphite radiation that kills in minutes a slow agonizing death.....

    • @Bohnenesser
      @Bohnenesser 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dyatlov: "ur delusional"

    • @samuele8361
      @samuele8361 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's such a thing known as "dose". Drinking half a litre of water is perfectly fine, drinking 40 litres of water at the same time is probably going to kill. The same principle applies to radiations, below 100mSv per year there's evidence on negative impacts on human health. Ofc chernobyl workers and firemen received a dose much greater than that.

  • @kingrixt
    @kingrixt ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good video

  • @mrpsd590
    @mrpsd590 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    6👎🏼 are from smokers

  • @Kereyuli
    @Kereyuli 11 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    thanks very knowledable

  • @PlanetImo
    @PlanetImo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great! Thanks.

  • @sunfishdana
    @sunfishdana 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Then why is it used to cure cancer???

    • @shamsnelson9004
      @shamsnelson9004 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I think they use radiation to kill the deformed/cancer cells -- the idea being it's better for a damaged cell to die than to reproduce.

    • @jimsuniverse4954
      @jimsuniverse4954 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It doesn't cure cancer. It spreads it.

    • @paulanderson79
      @paulanderson79 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jimsuniverse4954 That's the interesting dichotomy. It can be both malevolent and benevolent. Radio therapy is routinely used to cure cancers.

  • @monsteroreo1962
    @monsteroreo1962 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I just wanna know if I can listen to my AirPods

    • @sebastianalleyne1073
      @sebastianalleyne1073 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, yes you can

    • @jsvanilla
      @jsvanilla 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It releases so much radiation.

    • @sebastianalleyne1073
      @sebastianalleyne1073 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jsvanilla harmless radiation that is. (Non-ionozing)

    • @selaxlife7621
      @selaxlife7621 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ur ears are gonna grow weiners.....

    • @KevinBreidenbach-id3fj
      @KevinBreidenbach-id3fj 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They can see what you see. Hear what you hear. Program what you see and what you hear. Nanotechnology powered by the radiation. Both incorporated into the food.
      In short . yes they can if your hooked up with the interface program.

  • @chetanpadia4421
    @chetanpadia4421 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aren't you Scopus to use the word energy then radiation

  • @filteredview9302
    @filteredview9302 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Her explanation in the end is a bit scuffed, and it probably isn't easy for anyone new to radiation to understand what she said correctly.
    The title would be better if it were named "Radiation 101: What It Is, Why It isn't Dangerous"
    Because radiation is only dangerous when in very high amounts... yes radiation is dangerous but so is water. if you drink 10 liters of water you die, if your exposed to 0.1mSv with x-rays in 2 seconds. (Ct scan) you're fine. which are a ton of particles btw! 0.5mSV/s is the equivalent of holding a source that is "180 mSv/h" expect it isn't because it isn't even a full body dose.
    my point is to draw you away from the idea that "one single radiation particle" from a radioactive element can cause any harm, or genetic defects because it can't. 1 particle only effect one atom, and that's it. radiation happens at a very tiny level, I have radioactive sources that are considered safe, but reads upwards to 600uSv/h. which range from 350000bq (atoms decaying every seconds) which is no problem to have around, because the activity is simply not enough to do any harm., Billions of atoms every second or
    3 000 000 000 bq, then it's dangerous! people who die are exposed to billions of atoms in total,
    So if we compary radiation to other things that are more dangerous such as poison, then it's totally safe within itself, until a certain point if that makes sense, water is also safe until you drink too much, but isn't dangerous if you drink small amounts. same with radiation
    thanks for reading, hope this can make an interesting conversation.

    • @waylen_elora
      @waylen_elora 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So, I probably am going to use some parts of ur explanation for my upcoming speech on the topic Radiation 😂 thank you so much.

  • @pihuparuworld
    @pihuparuworld ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Legends in 2023😮😮😮😂😅

    • @MartyrOf
      @MartyrOf 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How about 2024 covid was wild right?

  • @leomartin5965
    @leomartin5965 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So radiation on certain levels can out run light.

    • @samuele8361
      @samuele8361 ปีที่แล้ว

      light that's not in a space vacuum

  • @nrajoli1
    @nrajoli1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank to you Dr. Williams.

  • @FahadRadi8
    @FahadRadi8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I came here because of the HBO show Chernobyl

  • @MrDometheo79
    @MrDometheo79 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    SUPERB!!!! 🤗 If i may, though?
    Broadly speaking....:
    1889, Power line harmonic radiation. Supression of Earths natural magnetic field.
    1918, radio era began. Powerfull LF and VLF frequencies pumped out to magnetosphere. 1918, Spanish influenza.
    1957, the radar era. Hundres of powerful military early warning stations littered high altitude latitudes of northen hemisphere. Milions of microwave energy surged skyward. Asian flue of 1957.
    1968, satellite era began. Hundreds launched. Although, they had weak broadcast power, but compounded the already existing radio wave pollution in the magnetosphere. Hong Kong flue of 1968.
    Next, Haarp activation and the beguining of the wireless era, cell phones included (4g and 5g etc)
    Result?
    Porphyrins and the Basis of Life...
    Marconi, the idiot savant, learned his lesson quickly (or did he🤔😔) about the dire effects of eletromagnetic radiation and its interaction/disturbance within Human Self Organising Biology(and other animals/insects. Bees specialy!)...because dear reader, for the great luck ( or curse)of the indewling Life aspect, incarnating within the Biologicaly Self Organising presets of Inception, these Bioverses are, after all, responsible for automating Trillllllllions of processes...Self Organisation fractals no less!! Let that, sink in!
    Pregnancies being THE best example.
    Or does the reader think thats it the mother (of ANY species) that assembles their pristine, profound, Highly Complex, offsprings....??? 🤔🤔🤔 indeed...
    Such hubris does our species have, that incarnating life awhereness in symbiosis with these Self Organising Bioverses, that it goes on destroying it all!!! 😔😔😔
    I mean the military not ""Global Warming"" (it should not take an advanced human being to perceive that it is the SUN, that does it all. RA)
    That military fiat currency is best used for the emancipation of the Human race..but no.......100000s of years of stupidity culminate in some curious choices🤔 and genetic predispositions🤔 Free Will indeed...
    How very advanced this present reiteration of incarnating humanity upon this Yuga is🤔. Greatly advanced🤔😂😂😂
    I do believe i have seen more inteligent potential sentience in Cats( despite their neural interfaces not allowing them to aproach human biology IQ levels) then in our "species"🤔...Very much so..🤔

  • @lovinglife5643
    @lovinglife5643 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Curious... has anyone read the textbook magnetobiology? Might be worthwhile if curious about 5g dangers

  • @parabellum4622
    @parabellum4622 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine I got here because I didn't know what energy color to color Qorvex from Warframe, a radiation Warframe. So, apparently now I'm learning about radiation more because of that. And I don't trust Fallout.

  • @japanuke960
    @japanuke960 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @TheaDragonSpirit oh shush that's not the point

  • @paulnewcombe3373
    @paulnewcombe3373 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What a great talk from a HOT doctor

    • @joebidenissus1975
      @joebidenissus1975 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're that "I'm gonna mary her so I get her money when she dies" kinda dude huh

  • @jrno93
    @jrno93 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thumbnail look like 80s and 90s james spader

  • @Abf_-oq8ps
    @Abf_-oq8ps 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    She’s in shock, take her to the infirmary.

    • @tylerspivey9639
      @tylerspivey9639 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Adam Flack why do you people keep saying that about the doctors explain radiation? Really wanna know...

  • @globofgreen
    @globofgreen 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why does she close her eyes for an unusually long time?

  • @felicitydeikos5250
    @felicitydeikos5250 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nuclear medicine?

  • @MrLougarou1000
    @MrLougarou1000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need her to teach me. She made it sound so simple.

  • @DanielGennaro
    @DanielGennaro ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if I’m being a hypochondriac but I seriously am so mad at myself for being so stupid. I broke my pinky finger, the base of my proximal phalanx about a year and a half ago, and unfortunately it healed with a malunion, I should’ve just let it go, but I’m a guitar player and I was considering doing osteotomy for it. It still affects me everyday because it healed with a hyperextension and rotation at the base of the proximal phalanx. Which is the worst place to break your finger cause it’s right by the joint. I wish I would’ve had surgery but for whatever reason the one I went told me to just buddy tape it conservatively. I didn’t get a cast or splint. Not even advice on best position to keep it in. I went to several different surgeons since then and got probably maybe 7 to 8 different x-rays over the course of the year, I also got a CT scan recently on my hand as well, I have been reading a lot about how I can damage the DNA, I can’t really explain it, but before my hand felt stupid and now it feels retarded. I feel like my hand is so weak, I just tried playing the guitar and maybe it’s partly muscle memory but I feel like I basically nuked my hand and destroyed it. My hand CT was a high 4.18 mGy and 101 DLP. That’s over a year and half of background radiation blasted into my hand. I also got a MRI to even though they said that’s non ionizing. But I’m sure there is still risk. Which is according to research about a year and a half background radiation. The problem is they don’t tell crap about that as you’re going into appointment. Wish they did. Cause I read it can damage your dna and it’s not like after a year and a half it’s back to good. It stays with you forever. This is the most covered up conspiracy of our generation. Withholding the risks of radiation ☢️ in our lives. lol this lady proves why this system is corrupt “ we don’t know!” That should be evidence enough. Wet always know I wonder if I’m being a hypochondriac but I seriously am so mad at myself for being so stupid. I broke my pinky finger, the base of my proximal phalanx about a year and a half ago, and unfortunately it healed with a malunion, I should’ve just let it go, but I’m a guitar player and I was considering doing osteotomy for it. It still affects me everyday because it healed with a hyperextension and rotation at the base of the proximal phalanx. Which is the worst place to break your finger cause it’s right by the joint. I wish I would’ve had surgery but for whatever reason the one I went told me to just buddy tape it conservatively. I didn’t get a cast or splint. Not even advice on best position to keep it in. I went to several different surgeons since then and got probably maybe 7 to 8 different x-rays over the course of the year, I also got a CT scan recently on my hand as well, I have been reading a lot about how I can damage the DNA, I can’t really explain it, but before my hand felt stupid and now it feels retarded. I feel like my hand is so weak, I just tried playing the guitar and maybe it’s partly muscle memory but I feel like I basically nuked my hand and destroyed it. My hand CT was a high 4.18 mGy and 101 DLP. That’s over a year and half of background radiation blasted into my hand. I also got a MRI to even though they said that’s non ionizing. But I’m sure there is still risk. Which is according to research about a year and a half background radiation. The problem is they don’t tell crap about that as you’re going into appointment. Wish they did. Cause I read it can damage your dna and it’s not like after a year and a half it’s back to good. It stays with you forever. This is the most covered up conspiracy of our generation. Withholding the risks of radiation ☢️ in our lives.

  • @paandrews537
    @paandrews537 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    She was lying about radiation, there's a difference between man-made that it is poisonous, and the type that is a part of nature... That we have always lived around and does not affect us, like man-made radiation.

    • @paulanderson79
      @paulanderson79 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      This video is absolutely accurate. How do you, personally, define man made radiation?

    • @micah7685
      @micah7685 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ct scan messed me up. Man made is the worst and making people sick.

    • @dagothodros641
      @dagothodros641 ปีที่แล้ว

      Put your tin foil hat on and take your meds. Let me guess you think the election was stolen too?

    • @samuele8361
      @samuele8361 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      man made (whatever that means) and natural radiations are the same: they behave the same, they have the same property and they have the same biological effect.

    • @baronsaturday1
      @baronsaturday1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She's lying. I know. I took radiation science in high school. Low doses caused the highest amount of mutations in the fruit flies we tested, while high doses killed off the grass. NOTHING GREW IN THE PLANTER!!!!!!

  • @faridbachir8511
    @faridbachir8511 ปีที่แล้ว

    And radiation comes from the satellites 🛰

  • @yoel9001
    @yoel9001 ปีที่แล้ว

    radiations is unhealthy in our healthy,

  • @DontWorryBouttaThing
    @DontWorryBouttaThing 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watches video... im a radiation specialist now 😬👌

  • @globy4104
    @globy4104 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Her eyes annoyed me. Otherwise pretty gud.

    • @ramonmartinez2477
      @ramonmartinez2477 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was "pretty good" regardless. Her eyes annoying you has nothing to do with the matter in which she is discussing. Her eyes annoying you is your very own problem you judgemental fuck.