What is radiation?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 556

  • @richardjarquin9498
    @richardjarquin9498 4 ปีที่แล้ว +404

    She says everything with a smile like I know wtf she’s talking about

  • @notoriousjm95
    @notoriousjm95 9 ปีที่แล้ว +244

    0:21
    I can't be the only one who thought she was going to say "but many of us just weren't paying attention."

  • @sebastianmackay5657
    @sebastianmackay5657 9 ปีที่แล้ว +589

    2:23 Half-Life 3 confirmed

    • @alvaroach
      @alvaroach 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ey lmao

    • @oneminutefixed5003
      @oneminutefixed5003 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      She said 3 half life, OMG

    • @MrA16Music
      @MrA16Music 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ayyy

    • @michaelkochanowski2054
      @michaelkochanowski2054 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      tf2 at start

    • @GrantGryczan
      @GrantGryczan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How did I know that this would be the first comment I'd see if I scrolled down to the comment section?

  • @ducttapedress98
    @ducttapedress98 4 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    Honestly this was really well made. I'm watching it simply because I was curious what radiation really was. It was easy to follow and really simplified the explanation! Thanks

  • @rEsonansDx
    @rEsonansDx 10 ปีที่แล้ว +460

    When taught in school - It takes one quiz to fail before understanding the basics of the topic
    When taught in TH-cam - It only takes 5 mins to understand the basics of the topic
    #IHateSchool

    • @dunno4550
      @dunno4550 10 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Yeah... God damn it! I want a teacher like this one :c

    • @jackvantice7561
      @jackvantice7561 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dunno ya know she was probably reading off of a thing

    • @rcatstott
      @rcatstott 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i agree =D

    • @rcatstott
      @rcatstott 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      you should look up vsauce it has alot of science and alot of other fun stuff enjoy :)

    • @dunno4550
      @dunno4550 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Jack Vantice Well yeah but that doesent mean she cant make studying interesting. I mean, my teacher, when she forgets something like... a page we should check in our books, she reads it from a paper. Thats kinda the same thing...

  • @ateela15
    @ateela15 6 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I can just barely grasp this due to being away from this type of information for years, but hearing the terms again is reawakening my memory a bit.

    • @InAnotherLife90
      @InAnotherLife90 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao huh?

    • @yassinghareeb5761
      @yassinghareeb5761 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same, my department is the farthest from chemistry, which makes it fun to reacknowledge this.

  • @eviremmerswaal1154
    @eviremmerswaal1154 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    around 1:35 she says, sometimes isotopes have to many neutrons, which makes them unstable. Then don't use Oxygen-17 as an example. This is a stable isotope.

  • @pointerish
    @pointerish 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "...or high level like X-Rays or Cosmic Rays from outer space." That escalated quickly.

  • @cdv3401
    @cdv3401 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    So I'm still confused about why some substances are more hazardous than others when it comes to radiation. Surely right now all around us, there are some atoms in the air that are undergoing radioactive decay but are not harmful to us. Yet, if you had prolonged exposure plutonium you would become ill very fast. Is this due to the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma particles that were discussed in the video? Is it that some substances release massive amounts of gamma particles while others only less so (I recall gamma waves being very hazardous to your health)?

  • @buzaldrin8086
    @buzaldrin8086 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    That famous line from "The Day After": Daddy, what's radiation?"

  • @Torvaxx
    @Torvaxx 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    3 years of notes and homework for "practice" and I still couldn't grasp this concept. Then this easy, simple video taught it to me in 5 minutes. How can school mess up that bad, Jesus.

  • @fonzcorp
    @fonzcorp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    Watching this i realized why I almost immediately vomited when I was injected with that stuff that MRI scans see in your system! Wow! HBO's Chernobyl sent me here btw.

    • @Summz24
      @Summz24 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ditto

    • @raisins7976
      @raisins7976 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chernobyl is love

    • @amirfmaster2515
      @amirfmaster2515 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me came from HBO too

    • @KokoLoko-km9ep
      @KokoLoko-km9ep 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same. Got me thinking about all the forms of radiation and energy we expose ourselves to.

    • @erikkurasukin9907
      @erikkurasukin9907 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      No way I'm here from that show too! xDD

  • @Lilliaace
    @Lilliaace 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This sums up my grad school textbook chapter in the best way possible.

  • @jordon_9333
    @jordon_9333 8 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Half-life? Half-life 3? Half-life 3 confirmed!? Knew it.

  • @laraahmed970
    @laraahmed970 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Teacher: *explains something for 2 hours*
    Students "I sTiLl DoNt GeT iT"

  • @VandanaSharma-ud8gd
    @VandanaSharma-ud8gd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm amazed at how simplified this was.

  • @veggietale7207
    @veggietale7207 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Plagueis the Wise?
    I thought not. It's not a story the Jedi would tell you. It's a Sith legend. Darth Plagueis was a Dark Lord of the Sith, so powerful and so wise he could use the Force to influence the midichlorians to create life... He had such a knowledge of the dark side that he could even keep the ones he cared about from dying. The dark side of the Force is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural. He became so powerful... the only thing he was afraid of was losing his power, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. It's ironic he could save others from death, but not himself.

  • @khanderaojogdandclasses406
    @khanderaojogdandclasses406 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I was confused about the radiation but you have cleared my concept Didi thanks for the genuine guidance

  • @nbydummy9157
    @nbydummy9157 10 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    you really thought the dropping a deuce sound effect was needed here eh?

    • @thewandering525
      @thewandering525 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn't get it, tbh. They could have provided a visual.

    • @selfademus
      @selfademus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      uuh, wasn't that just a toilet flushing?

  • @rustyhoops
    @rustyhoops 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    If my teacher looked like that I would have listened all day long 😍😍😍😍😂😂😂

  • @hanif2285
    @hanif2285 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This video was more lucrative than Stanford lectures. Thanks! 😍

  • @genepreston6025
    @genepreston6025 10 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    What's missing is a discussion on what levels are safe and what levels are hazardous. For example some naturally occurring locations of radioactive decay have much higher levels of radiation than the levels normally thought of as being hazardous, yet there is no evidence the local residents in those locations are being harmed. This is the real message that is needed, not a lesson in physics. Also it would have been much better to show the units of measurement such as uSv/hour and typical background levels. All of us are bathed in radiation all the time. Experiments show that the body is not harmed by low levels of radiation. There is a cutoff point though. What is that level? Well we don't know because the insistence of government agencies to rely on the linear model, that radiation is harmful all the way down to 0 levels, but this is not factual and is not backed up by experiments. See Pandora's Promise to get an idea of typical background levels. But don't spend much time in Rio because its more radioactive than some parts of Chernobyl that is off limits, well except for locals who have crept back in.

    • @Harizl
      @Harizl 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well, most studies have shown that due to it's semi-unpredictable outcomes, radiation is treated linearly due to exposure outcomes vary greatly from person to person. It may be outdated, but it's not as if there are non-trivial reasons to overcompensate versus possibly under-compensating.

    • @lennyfloss
      @lennyfloss 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The National Academy of Sciences released the BEIR VII report, which proved that the LNT model is accurate at low levels: 0-100 mSv. There is no safe dose. And the Petkau effect? Hm...

    • @genepreston6025
      @genepreston6025 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      lennyfloss
      What about this report? www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/05/04/cancer-and-death-by-radiation-not-from-fukushima/ U.N. report confirms Fukushima radiation will not cause cancer, scientist says
      A report from the U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation acknowledges that "no one will get cancer or die from radiation released from Fukushima, but the fear and overreaction is harming people," writes scientist James Conca. He argues that the Japanese people can now begin "eating their own food again, and moving back into areas contaminated with radiation levels similar to many areas of the world like Colorado and Brazil." He cites several facts related to Japan's Fukushima Daiichi accident, including the low level of radiation present in all foods produced in Fukushima prefecture and Japan's efforts to restart its nuclear fleet. Forbes (5/4)

    • @lennyfloss
      @lennyfloss 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea I heard about that report. You should read this analysis of it: www.ianfairlie.org/news/new-unscear-report-on-fukushima-collective-doses/

    • @genepreston6025
      @genepreston6025 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lennyfloss
      Whats lacking in those low dosage assumptions for long periods is the ability of the body to repair itself. There are monks living at high altitudes who do not suffer the cancer rates but are exposed to continuous high radiation for long periods.

  • @paulmshepherd
    @paulmshepherd 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Excellent presentation. Thank you!

  • @laqueeshous1813
    @laqueeshous1813 9 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    The Glowing Sea has a lot of this stuff.

    • @Dillibong3
      @Dillibong3 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Freeze Cryo fallout refernce

    • @Dillibong3
      @Dillibong3 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i throw some nuke grenades and kill those radscorpians and deathclaws

    • @perchperkins7497
      @perchperkins7497 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      ^^^

    • @P.bateman
      @P.bateman 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Moctopus lol ikr

    • @urban81-61
      @urban81-61 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +ProG Cryo Another settlement needs your help

  • @shekhfirdauszubair3951
    @shekhfirdauszubair3951 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At school l can't understand anything but when you teach me I got it in 5 minute
    Thank you🙋

  • @abhishekdhakar007
    @abhishekdhakar007 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this girl ,in the way she taught

  • @virsuryaircas
    @virsuryaircas 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I been using Internet from my 12th grade no video has given me a clear cut explanation...i mean not only this topic so far all types....thanks sister!!

  • @shin1300
    @shin1300 10 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    0:52 this is why people think science is lame

    • @xGalasko
      @xGalasko 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      shin1300 lmao that was so cringe

    • @louf7178
      @louf7178 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ?

  • @CarloRedl
    @CarloRedl 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Best vid ever. Saved me from failing test. THanks!

  • @sabawonkarimi1495
    @sabawonkarimi1495 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have studied this about 3 months in school but I understand it better in 4 minutes video.

  • @doyourbst
    @doyourbst 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A wonderful way of explaining the process of radiation.

  • @none377
    @none377 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay, but what does the type of the radioactive decay particles depend on? when will the atom release Bata when will it release Gamma and Alpha?

  • @joshuarobert14
    @joshuarobert14 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So if deionized is "safe" forms of radiation vs ionized radiation gamma rays having plus 1 or minus 1 proton could you theoretically neutralize or deionized harmful radiation such as Fukushima by applying a negative charge across the plane of affected area?

  • @princeprem6820
    @princeprem6820 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *#Radiation** is the mode of transfer of heat from source to receiver without heating the medium between them*

  • @luffyy8194
    @luffyy8194 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the clear explaination😀🙌

  • @Legacy_Ikor
    @Legacy_Ikor 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    She really broke it down
    Now I understand what radiation is all about

  • @XavierMathewsEntertainment
    @XavierMathewsEntertainment 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    FINALLY someone who explains it and I get it. Thank you.

  • @kaushalsingh2398
    @kaushalsingh2398 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you ma'm for giving me the information about the topic I was having confusion about...☺☺☺☺

  • @usicmixrt6038
    @usicmixrt6038 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does heat transfer in vacuum or not?

  • @OriJ123
    @OriJ123 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I never thought that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission would help me with my science exam.

    • @RedJonathon719
      @RedJonathon719 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well you shouldn't be playing too much MineCraft and start REVISING!

  • @viruchamp
    @viruchamp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perfect!! Thanks.

  • @mic_liv_0911
    @mic_liv_0911 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish I had youtube when I was in school. (so much easier to learn) Thanks!

  • @flik221
    @flik221 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    radiation is the transfer of energy by electromagnetic waves. it is a type of energy transfer like conduction (transfer of energy through molecular motion) or convection (transfer of energy through movement of mass). :D

    • @teaP23445
      @teaP23445 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      That sounds a lot like kinetic energy.

    • @anuchandnani6114
      @anuchandnani6114 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Expalain in hidhi

  • @syol9654
    @syol9654 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi, I from colombia, I have a question about of radioactive decay; it is: what happens with the energy released by the atom when it decays in the human body? and the body absorb this energy?

  • @vaisakh911
    @vaisakh911 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    A small doubt...................correct me if im wrong.......will all the radioactivity go.............like......wont there be a half remaining??? (In the gamma radiation injection scene).

  • @amitksaini5482
    @amitksaini5482 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Since i saw no comment of IT, I would do the honors "HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED!"

  • @jayeshgurav1419
    @jayeshgurav1419 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will you provide some study material of radiation.

  • @RadiCho
    @RadiCho 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When you have not been in high-school yet ; )

  • @TodoArcilla
    @TodoArcilla 8 ปีที่แล้ว +199

    Lol I did not understand anything xD

    • @kingmike2693
      @kingmike2693 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Same

    • @gamerdude1246
      @gamerdude1246 8 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      It doesn't become simpler than this..

    • @like-icecream
      @like-icecream 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      No it does, radiation is atoms falling apart and the reason radiation is dangerous is because it destroys the DNA and cells.

    • @AlexisRestless281
      @AlexisRestless281 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dem but why tho?

    • @like-icecream
      @like-icecream 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      because they're small enough to cause damage to dna

  • @sourpad1932
    @sourpad1932 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've learned more aboat radiation from this fine canadian than my high school teacher

  • @geraldmoore5703
    @geraldmoore5703 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a way to reject space? And use that rejection as propulsion?

  • @kanatapaw
    @kanatapaw 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned more here than in school

  • @MCKGanga9419
    @MCKGanga9419 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which software do you use

  • @JaehoonMe
    @JaehoonMe 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the explanation

  • @tausiftausif5460
    @tausiftausif5460 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    we could able to understand everything from this video

  • @Unifyhandmade
    @Unifyhandmade 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I want a jelly bean

  • @renugadevi9081
    @renugadevi9081 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice explanation

  • @Perplexer1
    @Perplexer1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What I really wanted to find out is the difference between particle and wave radiation.

  • @lazyfart5425
    @lazyfart5425 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I want to become radioactive!

    • @kirza94
      @kirza94 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      go for a stroll in chernobyl :D

    • @wil8994
      @wil8994 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah right

    • @muhammadzainulabydeen52
      @muhammadzainulabydeen52 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bas chawal mari hai

    • @TatvaToday
      @TatvaToday 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@muhammadzainulabydeen52 accha

  • @johnblake4523
    @johnblake4523 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video -- thanks Canada, thanks CNSC!

  • @Mecks089
    @Mecks089 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    They didn't mention anything about how Radiation can possibly flow throw most Solid Objects, nor how or why Lead is a reasonably decent shielding material and cuts the effectiveness of radioactive decay.

  • @Jons_broken_toe
    @Jons_broken_toe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Who here after watching Chernobyl series?

  • @Avenger4343
    @Avenger4343 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    i dont understand the decaying process. i mean why is it going half and half and half? arent all the atoms existing at the same time? shouldnt they decay all at the same time?

  • @ANIMALCRACKERS85
    @ANIMALCRACKERS85 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks to movies and video games, many of you have heard about radiation... but because of your public school education many of you may not know exactly what it is.

  • @Glen67z
    @Glen67z 9 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    fallout 4 brought me here

  • @safidif648
    @safidif648 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    can we use Gama ray as disinfectant for drink water ?

  • @kevinbundy9154
    @kevinbundy9154 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    WELL DONE!

    • @petermarch2357
      @petermarch2357 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amazing that such bad science passes muster in Canada. The atom as a planetary system has been debunked for half a century at least, the idea that all the universe is made of atoms is ridiculous, equally ridiculous is the idea that scientists themselves think they understand radiation. Getting a smug actor to talk such outdated rubbish is further proof of how disgracefully misinformed we are.
      The fact is that quantum theory is in a death struggle with relativity and radiation is the very heart of the problem. Would we be tolerant is someone told us that communism evolved as a response to the Christian desire to share? or if the cheery little girl told us that money is just paper (it isn't even) so it's silly to think we don't understand it! " It's just paper" grin, grin. It's hopeless. How sad. And our teachers are paid to mouth off all this drivel.

    • @kevinbundy9154
      @kevinbundy9154 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Peter March
      They obviously made some simplifications and generalizations to appeal to the general public which I thought they did very well. If they produced it to the level that you are suggesting, no one would watch it.

    • @barnard8139
      @barnard8139 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Peter March I would be very interested to see your video if or when you decide to produce one. You sound very knowledgeable and it would be a shame to keep it all to yourself.

    • @muhammadzainulabydeen52
      @muhammadzainulabydeen52 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      na tay kis shay da ????????? tenu smjh a gai

  • @demonitonttu9872
    @demonitonttu9872 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "I'm a wanderer, Yeah I'm a wanderer."

  • @DevLev
    @DevLev 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *I love videos like these! Thanks!*

  • @Kingtographer
    @Kingtographer 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does radiation travel through the vacuum of space? doing research! thanks

    • @Kingtographer
      @Kingtographer 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      cnscccsn okay please let me know

  • @TrangMai-pi6rv
    @TrangMai-pi6rv 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much. I had great understanding about Radiation and Radioisotope.

  • @BiggyNest
    @BiggyNest 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I know how half life got it’s name, thanks

  • @Senee628
    @Senee628 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wish i would learn harder in school and could be clever today, being a doctor or a scientist. I always mess up every of my first characters in every game.. too bad i cant start a new life.

  • @DamienSawyer
    @DamienSawyer 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    My three and five year olds love this.... Their favourite bit is the flush :-)

  • @kristinatorosyan7967
    @kristinatorosyan7967 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much, now i understand what is radiation 🙏🏻!

  • @davidlozano9974
    @davidlozano9974 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m curious as to how radio active material is dangerous to humans? If we take the Fukushima disaster in Japan as an example - where in the “air” is the radiation?

    • @davidlozano9974
      @davidlozano9974 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      cnscccsn thanks so much for the excellent reply!:)

  • @suri123ful
    @suri123ful 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you slow down your speed of talking then it will help a lot. I am a beginner and i am facing much problem to understand this.

  • @voodoo1506
    @voodoo1506 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the video, but didn’t explain what alpha, beta, and gamma are in greater depth (electron, helium nucleus, and EM wave I think), and didn’t even mention neutron radiation. Also, what is ionizing vs nonionizing beyond a vague “harmful/ non harmful”.

  • @jordanbrincat743
    @jordanbrincat743 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really cool dude that was epic

  • @ThaOriginalGangsta77
    @ThaOriginalGangsta77 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    How would you speed up radioactive decay to eliminate the radiation from nuclear waste? Is there a better way to dispose of nuclear waste rather than just burying it so we can protect the environment?

  • @devarajathinarapu7701
    @devarajathinarapu7701 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your teaching

  • @ThaOriginalGangsta77
    @ThaOriginalGangsta77 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happens if you ionize or electrify a neutron inside an atom tho

  • @liamx102
    @liamx102 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    been playing so much fallout 4 so now I'm here

    • @myocyte
      @myocyte 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +liamx102 i feel you man

    • @alexcornick6518
      @alexcornick6518 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      same here

  • @estherjung8545
    @estherjung8545 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So helpful for my project thank you!!

  • @ashutoshshukla5912
    @ashutoshshukla5912 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing ❤❤ great explained

  • @YOMALO.
    @YOMALO. 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    you're a cool teacher, I've understood everything like its my native language

  • @Funentertainment4574
    @Funentertainment4574 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for your explanation

  • @lukasvaiciulionis3736
    @lukasvaiciulionis3736 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i like this very much
    thanks canada

  • @beb0p858
    @beb0p858 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I need some help please. She said that a radioisotope is an ATOM(with an unequal amount of neutrons and protons) But later she goes on to say that "half-life is the amount of time it takes for half of the radioactive atoms in an isotope to disapear" But an isotope is an atom. So what she's really saying is that "Half-life is the amount of time it takes for half of the radioactive atoms in an atom to disapear. That doesn't make any sense. Does she mean particles? What's going on

    • @NightWolf40
      @NightWolf40 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      i belive that halflife is a proccess where atom tries to have the same protons and neutron level

    • @beb0p858
      @beb0p858 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      So she means "an equal amount of neutrons and protons" instead of atoms

    • @puroboludeo1
      @puroboludeo1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      She meant that half life is the time it takes for half the atoms of a determined amount of a determined substance to dissappear (in order to do so, those atoms need to be isotopes).

    • @beb0p858
      @beb0p858 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I see. Thank you :)

    • @larrytruelove7112
      @larrytruelove7112 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Henrik Jensen
      The radioactive substance isn’t disappearing, it’s emitting its neutrons, beta particles or gamma radiation. A half life is when half of the element emits their particles to the next stable level. Sometimes the next stable level is another isotope or sometimes another element.
      There is an ideal balance of neutrons and protons but not necessarily equal in number. The most stable form of hydrogen has one proton and no neutrons.

  • @gabrielgopez9976
    @gabrielgopez9976 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well explained! Thankyou

  • @battywingz
    @battywingz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imaging having this sent to you for remote learning😭

  • @davidnemewe9192
    @davidnemewe9192 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very amazing explanation.The story you teach is set in order 1 by 1.Thank you.

  • @harriskashif3589
    @harriskashif3589 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanku I got information in detail because of you tanku◀◀◀◀◀◀◀↑

  • @saliqueahmad4277
    @saliqueahmad4277 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well explained...

  • @SkSayed
    @SkSayed 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for your information it's very basic though

  • @jaredpatterson1701
    @jaredpatterson1701 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    aside from all the video editing and mindless comments, I want to see the part where we learn how this radiation affects the body

  • @carocuno06
    @carocuno06 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I seem to have ingested cold medicine which possibly built up a potential radio active particle. I ate a few jars of pickles eating the whole jar. I find it possible to have a radio wave attached to my body. It makes my stomach and other parts of my body twitch. How do I get this radio signal to detach. I seem to block it for awhile but it keeps coming back. It seems I’ve found ways to energize the signal. Please help me better manage and shield signals causing potential Parkinson’s.

    • @Gomlmon99
      @Gomlmon99 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      carocuno06 that’s not how radio waves work... or radioactivity. Try reading up on some basic physics.

  • @allsmiles3478
    @allsmiles3478 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation 👍

  • @alighasemi3417
    @alighasemi3417 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very well explained, Thanks :)

  • @LaserM1KE
    @LaserM1KE 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    if i go to the most radioactive places on earth, i will be radiated a lot, but will the radiation fall off in time or stay with me permanently