The story in west was told by left over soldiers after long journey that too through a story by mouth. The terrain was not easy to conquer! Why wud he came all the way to India fought and left??? Doesn’t add up. I never agree on this story but as usual west is west!
This might be true. When I visited Nalanda University ruins, I came to know that their library was so huge that it was burning for 6 months. You'll never know what literary treasure was lost. Foreign invaders just attempted to destroy our history.
@@ArchanaSingh-gj2sy being the nerd I am. I want to kill the muslim men and the king who put such great knowledge to ashes, *in the MOST. PAINFUL. WAY. POSSIBLE.*
You are wrong this time miss. Alaxander's invasion was the key incident that forced Chanakya to visit Magadha. He told Dhana-Nanda that a foreign force named "Alakshyendra" (one with no goal) is invading the Indian subcontinent and Magadha needs to send an army. Dhana-nanda then humiliated him infront of everyone after which he swore he would dethrone Dhana-nanda. Chanakya then trained Chandragupta Maurya and while in his training he sent him to Alaxander's army as a spy/convoy. He told the Greeks about the river Ganga that is twice as wide and thrice as deep as Hydespas (Jhelum) and and an army 20 times as large as that of Porus's army with over 4000 elephants. This frightened the Greeks so much that they mutined against Alaxander and forced him to go back. This is recorded in both Mudrarakshasa, a sanskrit play about Chanakya's strategic dethronement of DhanaNanda and in Greek records where young Chandragupta is mentioned as Sandrosottus. He is also mentioned to have married princess Helena, the daughter of Selucus Nicator I. He gifted them 600 elephants during the wedding, thus proving his claims to be true. In reality, Magadha army was not going to fight because Dhana Nanda spent his time in leisure. But the rumour spread by Chanakya sure managed to shoo them away. P.S. the real name of Porus is Maharaja Parmananda Katoch of the Katoch dynasty. Please read history before spreading misinformation.
Someone please report this lady spreading false information on history.. sowing seeds of hatred for things that happened in the past by distorting history creating hatred amongst communities..this should be a punishable offence
Yes, the great alexander was shooed away by rumours. Apparently the World conqueror alexander didn't have spies to send and verify the rumours. Yes your bull**it really makes a lot of sense😅😅😅
I am not a historian but a play is not historical record as those are often places of art and fiction. Greek records also contained plays. She is saying it id unlikely that a University so close to a warzone would have generated objective records about the events in case they were raized, so the history is questionable.
Raja Purushottam (or whom u call king porus) was a border chief, under the reign of Chandragupta Maurya, and the battle was so easily won against alexander (big thanks to trained Indian War Elephants) that it wasn't worthy enough to be even written...
@@rudra.baldaniya After defeating the army that had just conquered the world's largest land empire, Porushottama did a Jay-Z/Obama/Luke Skywalker dirt-off-your-shoulder and said "Meh, nbd. So easy we dont even need to tell anyone about this."
@@shreyasthorat4117 .....but it was destroyed. She's basing this claim on the lack of evidence from a institution that was destroyed. You do know that burnt books/scrolls cant be read, right?
As a European we don't even know about porus or Alexander invading his kingdom. Alexander vs porus is a legend made by Indian themselves. We were taught that Alexander came back to Macedon for replenishing manpower and died. He never invaded India.
His “invasion” wasn’t even a minor disturbance to India. He was either defeated by a small king Porus or won in a narrow margin against Porus but was afraid of the stronger forces in India. So he left. This might be the real story…
@@jayalakshmijayachandran8370 it was not a hidden fact that Greeks often used to hide information in order to remain a mighty force in front of their public as well as enemy... Many say the ancient Greeks were the creator of Propaganda
She is using nationalism to get a lot of views and support i am a indian but i agree the fact that there are a lot of great people who created history she is portraying our selves as we were the best in everything which is false we have to learn about accepting the truth
Yes I totally agree she is just arguing with historians,who actually went there and researched everything and gave their life for the research while she is being an pain in the butt by sitting in her house and searching online things and shouting like she achieved something,society really sucks some times man...
Saaaarrr..!!!!!! we doing ha1a1a, bmb b|asting and mutual inbπeeding so should we write ✍️ Muhammad as a certified p€d0phi|e? No no abdul write him as a pr0phet.
Saaaaarrr...!!!!! We have doing been ha1a1a, mutual inbπeed1ng, and bmb b1ast|ng according our ho1y scripture so should we write ✍️ Muh@°mm@d as a p€d0ph1l€ "No" "no" abdul are you 1nsane? Make him pr0ph€t.
@RajnasyaWhy is it that every podcaster and keyboard warrior disagrees with actual historians who have been studying for years? Just because there are no records in Indian history doesn’t mean this never occurred.
Ikr. Alexander was the greatest conqueror ever and the only reason he didn't conquer further of Asia was because his armies were done with the battles. They had been travelling for years and wanted to return home. Ain't no way he lost to Porus.
@@shinzouwosasageyo2785 yep, he didn't. There are written records of battles Alexander fought after having subdued Porus at Hydaspes (Jhelum). He fought his way to Hyphasis(Beas) after vassalising Porus, but the threat of the mighty Nanda Empire is what discouraged him & his troops from crossing Beas.
@@shinzouwosasageyo2785 the war elephants did a number on his tightly packed phalanxes, & Porus only had a handful, compared to what the Gangetic Plains-spanning Nanda Empire had at their disposal.
You watch one short and assume history is a lie he beat one western king and gave up when he saw a 300,000 man army on the other side of the river it’s not the Greeks saying the Indians were weak
It's not about defeat, if a war happens one has to be defeated at the end, and how many times you western guy invaded and killed innocent Indians for luxuries, food and land. The Mughals, the Mongols, the British, the Dutch, the Portuguese, and many others attacked us and how many times we defeated you guy?,😂 numerous times. You guys have a very good history of burning the records and manipulating them. We all know britishers alone killed more Indians than the Hitler killed in his entire lifetime.
@@iamdarkphantom you are one of the brain washed librandus who calls themselves hindu but actually knows nothing abt our culture, history and much more, it's not your mistake your stupid as& wouldn't be able to analyse and memorize even an percent of our religion
@@atharvnandal9035 i know things more than you do deadass. i know all of history and what was right and what was fake and wrong. you also better go touch grass and get a job so you dont waste your parents's money all the money they earned must be going waste on a no brainer like you
1. Alexander did defeat porus and most Indians who are actually aware know how his bravery was appreciated by Alexander. And Alexander deserves his title due to his conquest. 2. It's natural for ancient kingdom rulers to not record their defeat so its not unusual to not find evidence on that aspect..no need to state that Indians condemn Porus or his abilities for that.
@@vavakunju17, kiddo this really shows the your propoganda western propoganda, if a king wins it's not compulsory to note down, 🤣🤣, kiddo you don't have any proofs debating about the topic which is not a truly topic which proves your 🤡🤡, kiddo for Indians, Raja porus, was normal king like city level, and he was not that much powerful according to india, because India had won and participated many wars which might be more powerful than Alaxander , so the Alexander's battle would not be that much for Indians, but Alexander would have used his full soul to give competetion to Raja porus, it would be common for Porrus, 🤡🤡
@@vavakunju17 that's not how it works, that your western terminology, we indians not does it, indian had written the battle which were important for our mind, our culture, and our future only, the Alexander battle might not be that much good according to Indians, it might be a small scale fight for Indians, because Indians would have participated in battle which would be more massive,
@@vavakunju17 if western books say that Alexander's battle was amazing no one could stop him, but he met indian king porus, Alexander loved porus technique so Alexander didn't invade India, it doesn't make sence, truly west is hiding about the battle, if west needed to say all this, and appreciate raja porus, then Alexander might be losed to porus, and westes are tyna hide it, bro it truly shows the propoganda, If Alexander won the battle with porus, why would he give back land to porus, why would he return, his conquest was to conquer the world, there will be millions of kings, like this much good tactics, it really shows that Alexander might not winned from Raja porus, there's no of proof this battle so the west can write it blindly by adding some spices to the story 🤡
Alexander was never defeated. Dude literally defeated armies way larger than his, routinely. He was a military genius, personally tutored by Aristotle. There is a reason why Generals to this day, still study his battles.
According to who should I believe that alexander won? he died after this battle, his flesh rotted and he got poisoned, his military was dessimated, yet after winning he gave back what he won 🤣 West is built on lie and its becoming evident now. That Guy was thrashed away from India. And thats the story. and that will be the story the world will know because that's the truth not the lies the west fabricated.
@@VictorZeinSlash He and his army was mandhandled like a B I TC H, thats why he ran away and died in agonising pain because of all the injuries he got. No amount of fabrication is going to change logic. And Fuck the west, your entire civilization will be wiped off in the coming few years, its already falling apart. Thats what happens when things are built on lie. Bharat has always been there throughout time, it is going strong and it will still be standing when every lie of the plundering thieves of the west is wiped of from the face of this planet.
Britishers came and tried to destroy this country, took away everything from us, looted us, murdered, raped plundered this nation and yet We are still standing and going strong. Thieves are going to talk about history. Go and talk to someone else who gives a fuck what a white B I T C H has to say about history. We are here to reclaim that glory, we rise and you go back to the same stone age crack where you came from and keep planning to fabricate new lies.
That's literally not what happened though. Records state that Alexander defeated Porus but his soldiers forced him to return back because they wanted to return to their families after years of service, and when they heard of a new campaign against some new king they just couldn't be asked. Indian scholars are known to have deep biases and the Greek scholars didn't work for the state and were obsessed with the truth. They would write in detail about everything, every battle they won or every battle they lost
it's horrible that she panders to ignorant Indians instead of encouraging ignorant uneducated Indians to get an education, she just spews lies and hatred
She and many others are attempting to rewrite history because of Indian nationalism. Indians are so petty they need to rewrite over 2000year old historical events in order to make themselves feel good.
Alexander the Great encountered resistance and faced significant challenges during his campaign in India, leading to some setbacks and losses.Battle of the Hydaspes (326 BCE):Encounter with Porus: One of Alexander's major encounters in India was with King Porus, the ruler of the region along the Hydaspes River (modern-day Jhelum River in Pakistan). Porus had a sizable army and a force of war elephants, which presented a formidable challenge to Alexander's forces.Strategic Brilliance: Despite being outnumbered and facing a well-defended position, Alexander employed strategic maneuvers to defeat Porus. He surprised Porus by crossing the river upstream during a stormy night, circumventing Porus's defenses and catching him off guard.Tough Resistance: The Battle of the Hydaspes was fierce, and Porus and his troops fought valiantly against Alexander's forces. However, despite their resistance, Alexander's superior tactics and the morale of his soldiers eventually led to Porus's defeat.Beyond the Hydaspes:Further Conquests: After defeating Porus, Alexander continued his campaign eastward, crossing the Beas River and reaching the edge of the Indian subcontinent. He wanted to continue his conquests into the Ganges River valley, but his troops, weary from years of campaigning, refused to go further.Mutiny and Return: Alexander's soldiers mutinied, expressing their desire to return westward. Reluctantly, Alexander agreed to turn back, and he began the journey back to Mesopotamia. His return journey was marked by hardships and battles with local tribes, but he eventually reached Babylon, where he died in 323 BCE.Legacy:Impact of Alexander's Campaign: While Alexander's campaign in India did not result in the complete conquest of the region, it had lasting effects on the cultural and political landscape of South Asia. Greek influences, such as Hellenistic art and architectural styles, spread to regions that Alexander had conquered, including parts of northwestern India.
Ok look at alexander religion gone 😂😂😂 but indian religion exit. We are oldest religion . We are not looter and attacker. Indian old king never attack other countries our religion this teach . Your alexander country accept Christianity. 😂😂😂😂. Christnity kill pagan religion. Green historian trust my source 😂😂😂
@@Publisher-wy6pb Technically he didn’t lose a battle but his army did not wanna fight the nanda empires 400,000 soldiers so they didn’t move further into India
Why would the Greeks just stop and go home and let them keep their kingdom. She makes sense.. imagine your troops go thru all that fighting and u was the leader say hey let's just give it bCk to them after our friends died in battle.. makes no sense.. she is right
@@maapauu4282 except Indians have records of Alexander , chanky wrote about Alexander and later chandergupta would marry daughter of Seleucid’s Alexander general
@@TheFatboyT he never gave back anything . Porus became a puppet king as Alexander moved further into India till he was face by nanda empires 400,000 soldiers while he had around 11,000 so his army refused to fight and advance further into India
@@rajesh1234530 Alexander was a genius, he employed king Porus. He became the satrap of the Punjab region, Alexander admired Porus bravery and saw the oportunity to make him a vassal, Porus in turn provided Alexander with gold and troops. Also if european kings were weak, Persia and the muslims would have conquered europe long ago.
@@joseloures7701 if only Alexander would have reached India after 2 years things would have been different , Vikram Aditya would have defeated him 😣 I think European were week tho , just see how many Muslim countries are there 😅 probably due to invasion. India was invaded too but still it thrives as a 🕉️ majority 🇮🇳 Secondly: porus was not a king , I mean he was a king but he didn't have an empire also the reason why i say he wasn't a big king is we don't have any record of such person. If Alexander would have helped him conquer other regions his records might have been maintained like Nanda Empire of that time.
@@rajesh1234530😂 If europeans are weak like you said, then India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Myanmar would not have been conquered by the british. 😂 excuse me mate, but your argument falls right here. Also I'm not talking about religion, i'm talking about conquest.
@@joseloures7701 Not all the empire were weak secondly India was not weak le me tell you India when Mughals conqueror wasn't a segregated country but was divided into small fractions ( let's not talk about this ) India was united under Martha empire ( 10th empire) which overthrow Mughals. Secondly it's time u realise British captured India not by strength but by a golden apportunity : " Battle of Panipat 3" also Known as darkest day of Indian history where almost 90,000 Marathas died . This battle made maratha weak & it was the time Britishers start their conquest Also u see Marathas were not only fighting Mughals at that time but Afghanis , Portugese & British too Also i agree we got captured for some 300+ years but ironically we Never changed our 🕉️ unlike Europeans who changed theirs after the few decades of conquest 🤣 Also Alexander was impressed by king porus ( who was basically a tribal king ) after conquering Europe & beheading their kings NGL says a lot about European kings inself 😂 " No sar we Europeans r very strong 🤡 first we believed on a man died on ✝️ but later we peed our pants due to Muslim fear & accepted islam lol 😆 " Alexander general after Alexander's death came to conquer 🇮🇳 we all know the results 🥱 , but that general captured a lot of Europe for next 40 years 😳
@@Keerthihistory also does one newspaper not reporting on an incident but rest does make it less believable? U also look for other archeological and logical evidences
Hoho, Criticizing her for this video is good but targeting her as a woman is not a bravery my son. If it is, then u should start this by asking ur mom🎉
@@Happy_919 Shut your biitch ass up motherfucker and don't ever disrespect your father again son. I would beat(ifykyk) the shite out of your mother for spoiling you my son.
The first time I came across this channel I was amused to hear her. But now that I've heard a few, I have started to feel annoyed. What she is trying to do is pouring fuel on fire. An already polarized society finding one more place to fight each other - her TH-cam comments. The creator obviously sees the huge influx of hate comments against religions and yet does nothing from her part to stop it. Trying to sell controversy? What should I do to stop seeing this poison in my feed.
No , there is no any records in which this thing mentioned that takshshila universities was closed , but time is cleared although , battle happened in 326 bc and takshshila universities abandoned by White huns in 5th century . Dates aren't not even close for Jokes . I am completely disagree with the fact that Alexandre broke his dream to be world winner due to that war with porus .
Raj Porus gave his life at the final round of this war, let Alexander alive by serious wound. So Alexander withdrawed his troops from India ,His mother also agreed.
@@MgKyi-eg1it in fact, it was mentioned in india history, at least in some point. The tactician Kautilya of Maurya Empire took the Battle of the Hydaspes as a lesson and highlighted the need for military training before battle. The first Mauryan emperor, Chandragupta, maintained a standing army. The chariot corps played a marginal role in Mauryan military infrastructure.
@@alkapremlokre2988bc selcious was defeated by chundergupt but porus was enemy of chundergupt didn't let them expand maurya empire into Punjab in his life some say was poisoned by them so didnt wanna glorify their ex enemy
@@srivenkateswaraswamy3403 Haha really!? Which fake historians are you talking about? She is just doing Hindu content and making India overrated in her content that's all!
lol, so even telling the real history or correcting the fake history is making things overrated what a mindset!!@@AaravGamezOffical why dont u make a channel by doing detailed study, and show no bias
Learned that from the Europeans. So how and when or even IF you ever found out about the Euro-Fake Mage**an NOT circumnavigating the planet and was killed by the Great Philippine Chieftain LapuLapu and his men on Mactan (Cebu) in April of 1521? It was the first recorded REPULSION 🫷of European aggressions on record in World history🤘 !!
Alex was just a king of Macedonia...Greek had many city states..in the league of Corianth....if Alex lost a battle they would revolt and make kings themselves....which is pretty much what happened once he died
@@amitbehl6099 अरे मेरे भाई मैंने पंजाब का नाम इसलिए लिया कि तुम्हें पता चल जाएगा की जो अलैगज़ैंडर का पोरस के साथ युद्ध हुआ था व पंजाब की सरज़मीन पर हुआ था मुझे पता है तब पंजाब का नाम पंजाब नहीं था लेकिन ज़मीन तो यही थी न तो हमें इसका इतिहास पता है। और दूसरी बात अगर अंग्रेज़ों ने कोई इतिहास लिखा है, तो ये कहाँ लिखा है कि उन्होंने जो कुछ भी लेखा वो सब झूठ है? और अगर जो कुछ मैंने पढ़ा है अगर वो अंग्रेजों का लेखा है तो उसमें उन्होंने अलेक्ज़ेंडर के नाम को सिकंदर क्यों लिखा? The world’s first civilisation took place in the area of Punjab. And she is talking about the University of Takshila that is also in Punjab. And she says that it is not written by the university of Takshila that Alexander came here for her kind information Alexander came 700 years after the establishment of the university, the university may have ceased to exist by the time he came.
@@jikkkjvghj No India ?!?!?!?!?!? JNU se ho ya AMU se ? "Bharatavarsha" has existed as a very huge empire even before the west started as hunters and gathereres. Sanatan myths ? yeah. Archealogical evidences like non-coastal rocks used in Ramasetu (your adam's bridge), discovery of Dwaraka the submerged city are all "myths" 'cuz the british master who $leep w!th y0ur m0m says so.
@@sumankarmakar3847 see, it doesn't work like that there are a lot of people and to be loved or be a hero for everyone its impossible. It cannot be applicable to everything, For example : if a "hero" Saves 100 people and kills 1 "villain", the hero is still gonna be villain for the close ones of the " Villain ". This may offend you so warning : For india, there were a lot of freedom fighters example : Mahatma gandhi He wanted peace, and his actions only intended peace but he was still a villain for the people who thought That non-violence can't kick all the britishers away. So for a Man who wanted to end the british rule he was a villain because Mahatma Gandhi did not use violence to kick britishers even when he had the power to do. But he was a hero for most of the india Because he tried to bring peace. So, the point being it depends on the person telling a story because there are a lot of different pov to see 1 thing.
So, Alexander wins the supposed battle and *let's Porus live* and *gives back the land?!* This behavior goes against Alexander's own past behavior...I call bullshit.
Same applies to Brahmins and Sanskrit based puranas. You wrote it, so you are the hero. In reality, the native tribes of India are the true men of this soil
@@AS235DIcorrect, the native tribes are the real owners of this soil but for a fact there is nothing to support your so-called Invasion theory of aryans. Chor aadmi... God had made varn not cast system. There is a lot of difference between them
Yeah.. it's really annoying and so common now. It's always black or brown people celebrating their history but completely unable to do so without it being at the expense of European/white history.
that's racism, but well most of history written by Europeans and History is not always written by victors, you have problem debating historical interpretations and perspectives@@EstbXCIII ?
@@venkatesh114 Alexanders invasion is recorded not battle of king porus and no king will write down their defeat by saying alexander humbled king porus and Alexander gave back kingdom 😂😂😂
Indians be like due to how biased they are: Alexander conquered India FALSE Britain conquered all of India FALSE Vikramaditya empire conquered all of Asia TRUE Vikramaditya isn't even real lmao
It’s important to remember that Alexander had largely used only Greek troops he started with in his invasions of Persia and had obviously lost soldiers along the way after countless battles, by the time of his battle against king Porus he’d already been campaigning for 8 years and his soldiers wanted to come back home to Greece, he had further conquests in mind but died before he could continue, had he mobilised Persia’s large population into his military and got a few more thousand from Greece; he would’ve been more than a formidable match up against the fragmented Indian Kingdoms. Came from Greece all the way to the edge of India and he was only 32 years old by the time of his death.
Bro what do u think alexander did? He connected india upto Europe. This gave urbanization. Mahajanpad period. Money economy. History is not about kings. It's about chain of events that led to people we are.
@@gyatak200 what Mahajanpadas? They are Indian Origin Kingdoms not of Europeans and Go and Research about Rakhigarhi. And don't say anything about Indian architecture ~ Thousands year old Temples are still standing.
@@gauravsharma_7 u r indian origin. But you may trade globally. Why? Because u follow economic system of currency exchange. Right. Alexander united central Asia. Now chandragupta defeated selucus nikator sitting in afgan. Married his daughter. Think why? Smoothe running of trade on silk route. Indian cotton and muslin was worn by Greeks. This pump of money made mauryan unite mahajanpad and become an empire.
@@gyatak200 Bharat had trade relations with Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia too. At that time when China was just rising and alot of Indian books they took to Europe at that time. And I know Trade is important too sustain a country/civilization but this is a fact that India was connected with Cental Asia, Middle East and Far east before arrival of Greeks. And Ancient Greek Religion shows similarity with Bhartiya culture.
Alexander was seriously wounded in the war and Porus was nothing compared to the mighty magadha empire next to him. the greeks were terrified by Magadha and returned to where they came from
Yes porus defeated Alexander and won the whole world and became vikramadiya and established the Hindu rashtra in makka madina 🚩🚩 Other records which mention Alexander victory are all false.
@Navdeep majority of rajpoots gave their daughters in marriage to mughals to save their kingdoms or to get a position in mughal courts , rajpoots joined mughal army to attack other Hindu kings.
Yet, Alexander's legacy remains. "Iskander" in Persian and "Sikandar" in Punjabi are variants of Alexander's name.There would not be such a legacy if Alexander was like yet another the hundreds of foreign conquerers on Indian soil. i.e,just because our history doesn't explicitly mentioned Alexander doesn't mean his history is wrong.
Alexander and sikander is different . Bhosdike gulaam...sikandar was a king existed in Assyrian Empire...while Alexander came very late and from Macedonia nearby Greece..😂😂😂
well actually Indians weren't Interested in history writing many historical facts we see are majority from foreign writers Greek, Roman, Chiniese scholars.
@@arishemthejudge6780lol like you have recorded the number of losses you faced in your history. It's fascinating that you only put the wins and don't talk about the losses how's that possible
Bro this argument would be a valid if the battle of hydapses was the only thing that was not mentioned in indian records and if porus and Alexander were mentioned,but in this case porus and Alexander both are not mentioned at all in indian history .if porus Alexander were so important they would atleast have a mention in the indian records,but selucus nicator is mentioned several times in indian records, but there is no mention of Alexander, as if he was not existent,if indians were "EMBARRESED OF THEIR DEFEAT" and this battle was so important they would atleast mentioned porus and Alexander or even write their own pov over the war .iam not a native English speaker so please make do with my english.
Even after so much revelations in past 5-6 years and pro-Hindu system, the fact that we still refer to him as porus tells us that we have miles to go...
Purushottam of paurav chandravansh kshtriya clan.. paurav clan was the last of puru clan in which famous kuru clan taken most of the bharatvarsh history. Maharaja purushottam was the last chandravansh kshtriya in the beginning of 28th kaliyug.
You do realise Alexander and the army didn't leave straight after the battle with Porus, right? His army travelled south and won more battles and founded new cities, including Bucephalia, in honour of his horse. They followed the Indus River, all the way to the Arabian Sea, built over 1000 ships to transport riches back to Babylon, and lost many men in the Gedrosian desert.
@@rakeshram7435 well it's not a source of any sought knowledge to be preserved in any of the ancient universities then the burnt of evidences doesn't make any sense. ...the writings are preserved if it contains any knowledge (in ithihasa)...
Porus wasn't a small king, Alexander won a narrow victory. His beloved horse was killed and he too was severely injured in the battle. He turned back because of some reasons 1 The climate of India specifically The Monsoon, it was the worst nightmare for the Greeks. 2 Mutiny in his army. His soldiers were too tired to carry on. 3 Chandragupta Maurya, his army was far greater than Alexander and he was a good general as compared to those who faced Alexander. These are some possible reasons in my mind if there are more please tell me.
1. Well an army who could stand in deserts of iran/persia can't stand in the fields of plains? Cuz ? Of rain? 2. Soldiers don't just fight one after another... They stay.. get stable n then get in another fight... So the kingdom that Alexander's army just won doesn't have enough food n shelter to repair the army? 3. Well Magadh kingdom was well known in west.. regardless of this Alexander made through all wars n reach there and chose to not to fight? How could even be the case... Feel free to add your points
@@captainvenom7252 1. Tropical climate brings more diseases, most of which would be totally unknown to the Greeks and they wouldn't even have the necessary immunities. In desert you just need water and food supply. And Persia isn't exactly a large desert like Arabia and had masses of civilised settlements where the army could resupply. 2. The mutinies happened in the back ranks, in present day Afghanistan and Western Pakistan. Not in the army he was commanding. He had to turn back so that his supply line doesn't get fucked. Any half competent general would prioritise that. 3. Alexander just barely survived his first encounter with elephants. And Nanda (Chandragupta wasn't yet there) had way more of them than Porus, who indeed ruled a much smaller kingdom. Proper intel on things like that was possible only in close proximity.
@@ADthehawk Well i know i might sound harsh but regions where the army stayed known as Alexandria, were mostly arid, semi arid regions bro.... There were and there are no tropical wet regions n not even sub tropical regions... And there's no new thing to die from a disease... Perhaps last statement is exactly what i said, Alexander got back cuz his army wasn't as strong as Nanda... Why to add such base less points that his soldiers were tired or afraid to die by diseases... Why can't just stay with actual facts...
@@captainvenom7252 bro I think you don't know the atrocities of Monsoon. If you read the military history of India, Monsoon played very important role in military campaigns. Yes his soldiers were tired but not physically but mentally, they were in war for years. Don't you know what was the condition of those soldiers who take part in World Wars.
Was there a Maurya empire already when Alexander came to India?? It was Magadh ruled by the Nandas. Chandragupta came into the scene only after: a) overthrowing the Nandas. b) Alexander's death and his empire divided between his generals, with Seleucus Nikator getting the eastern stretches i.e, present day northwest India, Pakistan and possibly present day eastern Afghanistan. Please feel free to correct me. So that I could correct myself where I am wrong. I'd be happy to learn and gain from you guys. 👍🏻
He left because he was unaware of India's vast land area.. He was assuming Ganges to be the end of Indian territory and was just shocked to know there is so much more to be conquered here. Plus he did not have enough supplies and soldiers to continue any further. Read history properly. Little knowledge is always dangerous 😔 Smash the like button if y'all people agree with me. I read this while I was preparing for UPSC.
I am sorry but, what you have read may not be correct. UPSC history syllabus is not from another world, it's similar to Ncert written by crooked pseudo historians.
@@SerCrispinCole they didn't. They praised Porus for his bravery. And they were sore losers not to do that had they lost (look at their depictions of Persia).
Yes we agree I have also read the same...people like her today think themselves great historians and then mislead people on social media...thankfully people are stupid and get misleaded meanwhile she would be earning money by misleading people.....these are the people who don't accept their fault but only try to glorify themselves.....this is the reason why we were slaved for such a long period...
@@sawe6051 U r an idiot nd brainless too. Takshila doesn't have the records abt Alexander is just a point in support of the evidences. Intelligence is a far away from ur head, just use ur common sense nd ask any momin abt what I said. 🤣
I have been told that he only returned cause his men threatened to commit mutiny, and Alexander obliged, because it's a little hard to fight wars without an army
Uhhh... I'm a historian, and I studied that Alexander never made it no further than Bactria... He touched the Indus, but due to his armies fatigue, he turned back... He never invaded India 🇮🇳 or Bharat!!!!
If you are speaking about the borders of modern-day India, then yes. Alexander the Great never entered India. But if you talk about the borders of the Indian Subcontinent, which, apart from India, contains Sri Lanka, the Maldive islands, Nepal, Bengladesh, Bhutan and Pakistan, then no. Alexander the Great conquered a part of India...
You Indian Nationalists are all over the place. One day you claim Bharata is the entire world. Then next day it includes Afghanistan and Uzbekistan. The next day it is only Gujarat and eastward. It all depends on what serves the ego.
May be Porus didnt want anyone to mention about his loss to Alexandra. Just because it is in the past, dont forget that dishonesty was born with mankind.
It was commonplace to not record your own defeats. In history, you can often tell if a nation is losing a war if their “absolute victories” are drawing closer and closer to their capital. It was also common to just not record losses also. Probably also likely to make records of victories which never happened also.
India isnt one nation. Youd think an encounter with a foreigner would make historical texts. Not that I have am opinion either way. Just as possible that shit got lost
Lately ì happened to visit Nalanda at Bihar. What a design planning and aesthetics. The reminiscence itself is so beautiful. Felt like staying back there and studying. Goosebumps when you said Thakshasila… Bharat ❤
Meanwhile look at the garbage buildings we construct these days by trying to shamelessly copy western "postmodernist" architecture. Look at how bland and uninspiring the new parliament building looks. Not a single trace of Indian architecture in it. Just one dumb box of concrete with stone tiles slapped onto it.
I lived in Patna for 5 years but couldn't visit Nalanda (bcz I was a student and my mom wouldn't have allowed to go far from town with friends) . I'll go later on
So....Alexander the Great comes to India, beats Porus in battle but is so impressed and respects him so much that he let him keep his kingdom even after defeat and she sees this as a terrible lie told by the Greeks.....honestly i think that is so wholesome. Out of all his Opponents Alexander found a King who fought with all his soul, courage and decided that such a man was worthy enough to continue ruling his kingdom. That in my opinion is incredible and the story i choose to believe ❤
Mam, i think much of your information comes from WhatsApp University. Alexander did not give back the Kingdom to porus. Alexander made him a satrap or viceroy. Alexander faced mutiny from his soldiers and so he appointed Selucus as his representative in India and turned back, eventually dying in Egypt.
@@Keerthihistorymam what is the fees at WhatsApp university, I also want to learn different kind of fake news there like you, and want to say india conquered the world
![[ไฮไลต์] แบดมินตันหญิง "เมย์ รัชนก" ไทย vs เบลเยี่ยม รอบแบ่งกลุ่ม | โอลิมปิก 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qfMROCoiKMY/mqdefault.jpg)
"History will always glorify the hunter until the lion learns to write"
Writing was burned my dear
Nice
Seriously? You think Indians doesn’t know how to write??
The story in west was told by left over soldiers after long journey that too through a story by mouth. The terrain was not easy to conquer! Why wud he came all the way to India fought and left??? Doesn’t add up. I never agree on this story but as usual west is west!
@@RC-Cleverqueen jj*j****j***j*jj*j*****j**j*jj
95% of Indian literature/text have been lost or burned. So you never know it might have an reference of Alexandar’s visit.
That'incident have a different timeline
May be at that time bakhtiyar khilji arrived
Hydespas war was happened when India divided in 16 mahajanpada
This might be true. When I visited Nalanda University ruins, I came to know that their library was so huge that it was burning for 6 months. You'll never know what literary treasure was lost. Foreign invaders just attempted to destroy our history.
Alexander won....u Indians suck .... always wanted to change history.... actually is Indians always lost for foreign invasion
yes that incident really destroyed a lot of history record s
@@ArchanaSingh-gj2sy being the nerd I am. I want to kill the muslim men and the king who put such great knowledge to ashes, *in the MOST. PAINFUL. WAY. POSSIBLE.*
Source - trust me bro
Its ambiguity in history, not information, silly person
@@hitheshlkstop believing her
She is telling lies
Greeko bacterian Empire existed after Alexander death in that region
@@hitheshlkso disprove Alexandros' triumph, silly person.
@@Dontbestupidlittleboy why should i, silly person
@@hitheshlk Well for one you could convince some one on the fence like me.
You are wrong this time miss. Alaxander's invasion was the key incident that forced Chanakya to visit Magadha. He told Dhana-Nanda that a foreign force named "Alakshyendra" (one with no goal) is invading the Indian subcontinent and Magadha needs to send an army. Dhana-nanda then humiliated him infront of everyone after which he swore he would dethrone Dhana-nanda. Chanakya then trained Chandragupta Maurya and while in his training he sent him to Alaxander's army as a spy/convoy. He told the Greeks about the river Ganga that is twice as wide and thrice as deep as Hydespas (Jhelum) and and an army 20 times as large as that of Porus's army with over 4000 elephants. This frightened the Greeks so much that they mutined against Alaxander and forced him to go back. This is recorded in both Mudrarakshasa, a sanskrit play about Chanakya's strategic dethronement of DhanaNanda and in Greek records where young Chandragupta is mentioned as Sandrosottus. He is also mentioned to have married princess Helena, the daughter of Selucus Nicator I. He gifted them 600 elephants during the wedding, thus proving his claims to be true. In reality, Magadha army was not going to fight because Dhana Nanda spent his time in leisure. But the rumour spread by Chanakya sure managed to shoo them away.
P.S. the real name of Porus is Maharaja Parmananda Katoch of the Katoch dynasty.
Please read history before spreading misinformation.
Someone please report this lady spreading false information on history.. sowing seeds of hatred for things that happened in the past by distorting history creating hatred amongst communities..this should be a punishable offence
@@deepz513literally and this not the first time she's done this, seems like people like her will twist history just for a few thousands likes
@@deepz513 which one?...the content creator or the one who commented
Yes, the great alexander was shooed away by rumours.
Apparently the World conqueror alexander didn't have spies to send and verify the rumours.
Yes your bull**it really makes a lot of sense😅😅😅
I am not a historian but a play is not historical record as those are often places of art and fiction. Greek records also contained plays. She is saying it id unlikely that a University so close to a warzone would have generated objective records about the events in case they were raized, so the history is questionable.
To be fair, if King Porus had won, he would have recorded it. If he didn't record the battle, it means he lost and slunk away in shame.
good point
Raja Purushottam (or whom u call king porus) was a border chief, under the reign of Chandragupta Maurya, and the battle was so easily won against alexander (big thanks to trained Indian War Elephants) that it wasn't worthy enough to be even written...
@@rudra.baldaniya After defeating the army that had just conquered the world's largest land empire, Porushottama did a Jay-Z/Obama/Luke Skywalker dirt-off-your-shoulder and said "Meh, nbd. So easy we dont even need to tell anyone about this."
@@cariboubearmalachy1174 exactly, that was his power, it just that Indian rulers weren't expansionists... And btw amazing use of words😂
Maybee it's not worth it to record a tiny and easy battle between porus and Alexandre 😂😂
The University closed 250 year before the battle and the distance was around 190 km from the University.
The Gypsy is not here to answer, because it took its caravan and left
Chad alexander beat virgin india easily
I thought we lost the gypsy hate in the Beginning half of the Last Century…
Or as we say in german „sprich deutsch du hurensohn“
Takshashila
Established in 800 BCE
Destroyed in 470 CE
Battle in 326 BCE
Moral of story it was there .
@@shreyasthorat4117 .....but it was destroyed. She's basing this claim on the lack of evidence from a institution that was destroyed. You do know that burnt books/scrolls cant be read, right?
Why can't they just accept the facts?
Alexander was the finest in history he had never lost a major battle it's just simple as that.
As a European we don't even know about porus or Alexander invading his kingdom. Alexander vs porus is a legend made by Indian themselves. We were taught that Alexander came back to Macedon for replenishing manpower and died. He never invaded India.
@@danielncs3750lol Alexander historians wrote about porus / pururava in their books bro
@@sachinnayaka32 i said in indian texts. Blud don't even get it
@@danielncs3750 Have you never heard of the battle of Hydaspes?
Because some people are brain dead and morons think porous defeated Alexander the Great😂. Porous was at the mercy of the great conqueror
Alexander defeated Porus. Get over it.
No
@@AnantsinghRajput literally yes.
@@AmericanTough no because Nalanda University burn by mugal attacker's that's why not
@AnantsinghRajput "no because I can't handle that a European general beat an Indian one." There I fixed your sentence for you.
@@AmericanTough ok
I love how every third podcaster knows history more than the historian themselves.
It's simple to know history research yourself! Don't believe anyone blindly and think with your mind
Yeah, because leftists Historians never lie or conceal facts.
@@militarymatterssits simple if you have a bias.... Its complicated if you want the neutral truth 😐👍🏼
@@Hatkar0 what is truth? Please tell me sir?
guys ... the truth is ... there actually was no king Porus, he was actually in Macedonia and it is only mentioned in greek docs
His “invasion” wasn’t even a minor disturbance to India.
He was either defeated by a small king Porus or won in a narrow margin against Porus but was afraid of the stronger forces in India.
So he left.
This might be the real story…
Possible
So the Greeks built a story on a baseless foundation to make them look good????
@@jayalakshmijayachandran8370 it was not a hidden fact that Greeks often used to hide information in order to remain a mighty force in front of their public as well as enemy... Many say the ancient Greeks were the creator of Propaganda
@@jayalakshmijayachandran8370 well very western thing
@@sumitadhikari5126 I'm not a History student, but this doubt was there for some years
She is using nationalism to get a lot of views and support i am a indian but i agree the fact that there are a lot of great people who created history she is portraying our selves as we were the best in everything which is false we have to learn about accepting the truth
I totally agree! I mean nationalism till some level is good but then there are some people....
Yeah shes a total sanghi
Yes I totally agree she is just arguing with historians,who actually went there and researched everything and gave their life for the research while she is being an pain in the butt by sitting in her house and searching online things and shouting like she achieved something,society really sucks some times man...
@@HazardFutBol Agreed. People have dedicated their lives towards history and then she just spreads false information
She's talking about loopholes dumb
"Saar, we are defeated in battle. Should we write it down?"
"No, Kumar, are you nuts?"
Then why Alexander can't concur the whole india... And his generals were terribly defeated by chandragupta maurya😂😂😂
Saaaarrr..!!!!!! we doing ha1a1a, bmb b|asting and mutual inbπeeding so should we write ✍️ Muhammad as a certified p€d0phi|e?
No no abdul write him as a pr0phet.
Saaaaarrr...!!!!! We have doing been ha1a1a, mutual inbπeed1ng, and bmb b1ast|ng according our ho1y scripture so should we write ✍️ Muh@°mm@d as a p€d0ph1l€
"No" "no" abdul are you 1nsane? Make him pr0ph€t.
I don't think so 😂😂@@mculover5196
Ok then fight the next King
As an Indian,I can confirm that Alexander won the battle
Western slave
@@user-uz7jg2cm7r F*** off idiot.. Don't just study from WhatsApp University
@@user-uz7jg2cm7r First of all I am Hindu
@@techiesheeky3136 so what slave lick ur western master's dick
@@techiesheeky3136 hindu by faith and western by mentality
He didn't "give the kingdom back". He vassalised Porus, as he did many others throughout his conquest. This historical revisionism is disgusting.
@Rajnasyarevisionist swine
@RajnasyaWhy is it that every podcaster and keyboard warrior disagrees with actual historians who have been studying for years? Just because there are no records in Indian history doesn’t mean this never occurred.
Ikr. Alexander was the greatest conqueror ever and the only reason he didn't conquer further of Asia was because his armies were done with the battles. They had been travelling for years and wanted to return home. Ain't no way he lost to Porus.
@@shinzouwosasageyo2785 yep, he didn't. There are written records of battles Alexander fought after having subdued Porus at Hydaspes (Jhelum). He fought his way to Hyphasis(Beas) after vassalising Porus, but the threat of the mighty Nanda Empire is what discouraged him & his troops from crossing Beas.
@@shinzouwosasageyo2785 the war elephants did a number on his tightly packed phalanxes, & Porus only had a handful, compared to what the Gangetic Plains-spanning Nanda Empire had at their disposal.
This is what happens when you graduate from WhatsApp university for the brain dead😂
Why?
where did you graduate to oppose this ambiguity
Haa bsdk, you graduated from Harvard.
People who use the word "WhatsApp University" are the real brain dead people
You graduate Instagram 😂😂😂. Looter, invader are great 😂😂😂😂.
Well a lot of times people don't like to record their defeats
In the West, we know for sure...
History is written by the victors.
You watch one short and assume history is a lie he beat one western king and gave up when he saw a 300,000 man army on the other side of the river it’s not the Greeks saying the Indians were weak
Yes bro
It's not about defeat, if a war happens one has to be defeated at the end, and how many times you western guy invaded and killed innocent Indians for luxuries, food and land. The Mughals, the Mongols, the British, the Dutch, the Portuguese, and many others attacked us and how many times we defeated you guy?,😂 numerous times.
You guys have a very good history of burning the records and manipulating them.
We all know britishers alone killed more Indians than the Hitler killed in his entire lifetime.
"it wasn't recorded in Indian books"
"It didn't happen"
Genius
@@rayalaraghukishore I'm a hindu and i say it didn't happen, it's just a fantasy story
@@iamdarkphantom you are one of the brain washed librandus who calls themselves hindu but actually knows nothing abt our culture, history and much more, it's not your mistake your stupid as& wouldn't be able to analyse and memorize even an percent of our religion
@Raunak so go touch grass and get a job dipshit
@@atharvnandal9035 i know things more than you do deadass. i know all of history and what was right and what was fake and wrong. you also better go touch grass and get a job so you dont waste your parents's money all the money they earned must be going waste on a no brainer like you
@@iamdarkphantom get a life bro🤣🤣
1. Alexander did defeat porus and most Indians who are actually aware know how his bravery was appreciated by Alexander. And Alexander deserves his title due to his conquest.
2. It's natural for ancient kingdom rulers to not record their defeat so its not unusual to not find evidence on that aspect..no need to state that Indians condemn Porus or his abilities for that.
Bro what if Alexander lose, plz dont be one sided 🤡
@@rnfury4579 then porus would have written down that in his edicts dude. That's how it works and alexander would not have mentioned his defeat
@@vavakunju17, kiddo this really shows the your propoganda western propoganda, if a king wins it's not compulsory to note down, 🤣🤣, kiddo you don't have any proofs debating about the topic which is not a truly topic which proves your 🤡🤡, kiddo for Indians, Raja porus, was normal king like city level, and he was not that much powerful according to india, because India had won and participated many wars which might be more powerful than Alaxander , so the Alexander's battle would not be that much for Indians, but Alexander would have used his full soul to give competetion to Raja porus, it would be common for Porrus, 🤡🤡
@@vavakunju17 that's not how it works, that your western terminology, we indians not does it, indian had written the battle which were important for our mind, our culture, and our future only, the Alexander battle might not be that much good according to Indians, it might be a small scale fight for Indians, because Indians would have participated in battle which would be more massive,
@@vavakunju17 if western books say that Alexander's battle was amazing no one could stop him, but he met indian king porus, Alexander loved porus technique so Alexander didn't invade India, it doesn't make sence, truly west is hiding about the battle, if west needed to say all this, and appreciate raja porus, then Alexander might be losed to porus, and westes are tyna hide it, bro it truly shows the propoganda, If Alexander won the battle with porus, why would he give back land to porus, why would he return, his conquest was to conquer the world, there will be millions of kings, like this much good tactics, it really shows that Alexander might not winned from Raja porus, there's no of proof this battle so the west can write it blindly by adding some spices to the story 🤡
Alexander was never defeated. Dude literally defeated armies way larger than his, routinely. He was a military genius, personally tutored by Aristotle. There is a reason why Generals to this day, still study his battles.
Alenxander was badly defeated like a b itch thats why he died at the end of it.
@@whatthefuckallhandlesaretaken According to who? Pajee t from Mumbai?
According to who should I believe that alexander won? he died after this battle, his flesh rotted and he got poisoned, his military was dessimated, yet after winning he gave back what he won 🤣 West is built on lie and its becoming evident now. That Guy was thrashed away from India. And thats the story. and that will be the story the world will know because that's the truth not the lies the west fabricated.
@@VictorZeinSlash He and his army was mandhandled like a B I TC H, thats why he ran away and died in agonising pain because of all the injuries he got. No amount of fabrication is going to change logic. And Fuck the west, your entire civilization will be wiped off in the coming few years, its already falling apart. Thats what happens when things are built on lie. Bharat has always been there throughout time, it is going strong and it will still be standing when every lie of the plundering thieves of the west is wiped of from the face of this planet.
Britishers came and tried to destroy this country, took away everything from us, looted us, murdered, raped plundered this nation and yet We are still standing and going strong. Thieves are going to talk about history. Go and talk to someone else who gives a fuck what a white B I T C H has to say about history. We are here to reclaim that glory, we rise and you go back to the same stone age crack where you came from and keep planning to fabricate new lies.
This falls in the same category as " Alexander was black" ...... 🤦🏻♂️
That's literally not what happened though. Records state that Alexander defeated Porus but his soldiers forced him to return back because they wanted to return to their families after years of service, and when they heard of a new campaign against some new king they just couldn't be asked. Indian scholars are known to have deep biases and the Greek scholars didn't work for the state and were obsessed with the truth. They would write in detail about everything, every battle they won or every battle they lost
Not to mention Menander just came and took north India 200 years later with barely a fight. And Alexander couldn't do it?
@@Peterblack12 also new Kingdoms had been made or the existing ones were weaker than before you genius
there's a Greek Coin where Porus sitting on an elephant is impaling alex on a horse. It's ON A GREEK COIN. What more proof do you need?
You said everything right but totally opposite
@@Peterblack12 200 years is a long time and in that time nations can fracture, get weak and be in the midst of civil wars
She is committing the fallacy "appeal to ignorance".
Alright genius what do u mean😂😂
You must be new here, 'appeal to ignorance' and 'appeal to prejudice' is her whole business model.
it's horrible that she panders to ignorant Indians instead of encouraging ignorant uneducated Indians to get an education, she just spews lies and hatred
She and many others are attempting to rewrite history because of Indian nationalism. Indians are so petty they need to rewrite over 2000year old historical events in order to make themselves feel good.
She trying to fool people
He actually defeated Porus .
She is saying no porus in history😂
He didn't. That is why he stopped in lndia. He gave up his dream to conquer world
Mangol who Alexander 😂😂😂
Alexander the Great encountered resistance and faced significant challenges during his campaign in India, leading to some setbacks and losses.Battle of the Hydaspes (326 BCE):Encounter with Porus: One of Alexander's major encounters in India was with King Porus, the ruler of the region along the Hydaspes River (modern-day Jhelum River in Pakistan). Porus had a sizable army and a force of war elephants, which presented a formidable challenge to Alexander's forces.Strategic Brilliance: Despite being outnumbered and facing a well-defended position, Alexander employed strategic maneuvers to defeat Porus. He surprised Porus by crossing the river upstream during a stormy night, circumventing Porus's defenses and catching him off guard.Tough Resistance: The Battle of the Hydaspes was fierce, and Porus and his troops fought valiantly against Alexander's forces. However, despite their resistance, Alexander's superior tactics and the morale of his soldiers eventually led to Porus's defeat.Beyond the Hydaspes:Further Conquests: After defeating Porus, Alexander continued his campaign eastward, crossing the Beas River and reaching the edge of the Indian subcontinent. He wanted to continue his conquests into the Ganges River valley, but his troops, weary from years of campaigning, refused to go further.Mutiny and Return: Alexander's soldiers mutinied, expressing their desire to return westward. Reluctantly, Alexander agreed to turn back, and he began the journey back to Mesopotamia. His return journey was marked by hardships and battles with local tribes, but he eventually reached Babylon, where he died in 323 BCE.Legacy:Impact of Alexander's Campaign: While Alexander's campaign in India did not result in the complete conquest of the region, it had lasting effects on the cultural and political landscape of South Asia. Greek influences, such as Hellenistic art and architectural styles, spread to regions that Alexander had conquered, including parts of northwestern India.
Reject Indian historians embrace Alexander the Great
Ok look at alexander religion gone 😂😂😂 but indian religion exit. We are oldest religion . We are not looter and attacker. Indian old king never attack other countries our religion this teach . Your alexander country accept Christianity. 😂😂😂😂. Christnity kill pagan religion. Green historian trust my source 😂😂😂
"Damn... we got our butts whooped..."
"Should I write that down, too?"
"NO, ARE YOU NUTS?!"
😂😂😂
Where is proof alexander lost?
@@Publisher-wy6pbhe is saying about the indians not alexander 🤦🏻♂️
@@kostasangels3128 why is it in the other videos of her's it actually sounds like she is saying Alexander lost a battle and left India?
@@Publisher-wy6pb Technically he didn’t lose a battle but his army did not wanna fight the nanda empires 400,000 soldiers so they didn’t move further into India
So basically her argument is that it never happened because the losing side didn't record the events... Great logic there.
No it's not. As a Greek person, the records have multiple contradictions
Why would the Greeks just stop and go home and let them keep their kingdom. She makes sense.. imagine your troops go thru all that fighting and u was the leader say hey let's just give it bCk to them after our friends died in battle.. makes no sense.. she is right
@@maapauu4282 except Indians have records of Alexander , chanky wrote about Alexander and later chandergupta would marry daughter of Seleucid’s Alexander general
@@TheFatboyT he never gave back anything . Porus became a puppet king as Alexander moved further into India till he was face by nanda empires 400,000 soldiers while he had around 11,000 so his army refused to fight and advance further into India
@@Rafael-xx1id That still does not mean the Greek version is accurate
Indian scribe: " My king, we just got our butts kicked, should we record this?"
King Porus: " Do it and I will personality behead you!"
Well Alexander recognised king's porus qualities, i wonder how week were European kings 😂 they might 💩 in their pants seeing him
@@rajesh1234530 Alexander was a genius, he employed king Porus. He became the satrap of the Punjab region, Alexander admired Porus bravery and saw the oportunity to make him a vassal, Porus in turn provided Alexander with gold and troops.
Also if european kings were weak, Persia and the muslims would have conquered europe long ago.
@@joseloures7701 if only Alexander would have reached India after 2 years things would have been different , Vikram Aditya would have defeated him 😣
I think European were week tho , just see how many Muslim countries are there 😅 probably due to invasion. India was invaded too but still it thrives as a 🕉️ majority 🇮🇳
Secondly: porus was not a king , I mean he was a king but he didn't have an empire also the reason why i
say he wasn't a big king is we don't have any record of such person. If Alexander would have helped him conquer other regions his records might have been maintained like Nanda Empire of that time.
@@rajesh1234530😂 If europeans are weak like you said, then India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Myanmar would not have been conquered by the british. 😂 excuse me mate,
but your argument falls right here. Also I'm not talking about religion, i'm talking about conquest.
@@joseloures7701 Not all the empire were weak secondly India was not weak le me tell you
India when Mughals conqueror wasn't a segregated country but was divided into small fractions ( let's not talk about this )
India was united under Martha empire ( 10th empire) which overthrow Mughals.
Secondly it's time u realise British captured India not by strength but by a golden apportunity :
" Battle of Panipat 3" also Known as darkest day of Indian history where almost 90,000 Marathas died . This battle made maratha weak & it was the time Britishers start their conquest
Also u see Marathas were not only fighting Mughals at that time but Afghanis , Portugese & British too
Also i agree we got captured for some 300+ years but ironically we Never changed our 🕉️ unlike Europeans who changed theirs after the few decades of conquest 🤣
Also Alexander was impressed by king porus ( who was basically a tribal king ) after conquering Europe & beheading their kings NGL says a lot about European kings inself 😂
" No sar we Europeans r very strong 🤡 first we believed on a man died on ✝️ but later we peed our pants due to Muslim fear & accepted islam lol 😆 "
Alexander general after Alexander's death came to conquer 🇮🇳 we all know the results 🥱 , but that general captured a lot of Europe for next 40 years 😳
We Indian's will never expect the truth. 💀
“In India history is not written by the historians it is written by the politicians".
So true
@@Keerthihistory also does one newspaper not reporting on an incident but rest does make it less believable? U also look for other archeological and logical evidences
Also has been changing by the political or so called religious people's
So which party supports Alexander 🙂🙂
I see uve never read a real historians point. Also how can u expect anyone to have a right answer to something that has no evidence
i like her confidence ..she too studied from somewhere ..but she is saying like she watched with her own eyes
Abhijit sir see suna hee
💀💀
What she's saying is factually correct.
@@Vishakha_B897 L comment
@@Vishakha_B897 I know but exactly same thing was said by Abhijit sir way too before
She speaks like she was there and she knows. She knows nothing. What a little brat.
Ancient Indian women don't cover the chest, so kindly follow the footsteps of your ancestors. I will really appreciate this. Much love.
I don't think I heard her saying that *all* Indian traditions are good.
Hoho, Criticizing her for this video is good but targeting her as a woman is not a bravery my son. If it is, then u should start this by asking ur mom🎉
@@Happy_919 Shut your biitch ass up motherfucker and don't ever disrespect your father again son. I would beat(ifykyk) the shite out of your mother for spoiling you my son.
Many modern Indian women in rural areas do not either. They have a sari but no choli, they let them swing.
@@Happy_919agree w yo first sentence, but u shouldn't have wrote the second one... u fell in the same category as him🥴🥴
Alexander was looking for the call centre scammers
shut up nigg*er who won mauryan selucid war ?
Underrated comment😂
rather got scammed by surprise elephants
bro it's a real problem! India needs and Alexander today.
@@rudra.baldaniya ?
The university closed 250 years before the battle and the distance was around 200 kms from the uninversity.
How will she make a video and get famous if you start pointing out such stuff😂
The first time I came across this channel I was amused to hear her. But now that I've heard a few, I have started to feel annoyed. What she is trying to do is pouring fuel on fire. An already polarized society finding one more place to fight each other - her TH-cam comments. The creator obviously sees the huge influx of hate comments against religions and yet does nothing from her part to stop it. Trying to sell controversy? What should I do to stop seeing this poison in my feed.
@@SandraVee click the three dots and then select don’t recommend this channel
Taxila University was thriving at that time you id!ot. You are another cl0wn like her.
No , there is no any records in which this thing mentioned that takshshila universities was closed , but time is cleared although , battle happened in 326 bc and takshshila universities abandoned by White huns in 5th century . Dates aren't not even close for Jokes . I am completely disagree with the fact that Alexandre broke his dream to be world winner due to that war with porus .
The reason the story isn't written down is because the battle wasn't of much significance
Channel Wali 🤡
Dhande Wali 🗿
If Porus won why did not he record this great feat
There is no mention of porus and Alexander at all in indian records ,but selicus nicator is repeatedly mentioned.
Because Marxists forced his teachings in Bharat.abd your Father congress glorified it.
Raj Porus gave his life at the final round of this war, let Alexander alive by serious wound. So Alexander withdrawed his troops from India ,His mother also agreed.
@@MgKyi-eg1it in fact, it was mentioned in india history, at least in some point.
The tactician Kautilya of Maurya Empire took the Battle of the Hydaspes as a lesson and highlighted the need for military training before battle. The first Mauryan emperor, Chandragupta, maintained a standing army. The chariot corps played a marginal role in Mauryan military infrastructure.
@@alkapremlokre2988bc selcious was defeated by chundergupt but porus was enemy of chundergupt didn't let them expand maurya empire into Punjab in his life some say was poisoned by them so didnt wanna glorify their ex enemy
her only job is to disagree with historians
Yes! And make a true history overrated!
Because learning history is about being debatable. History can’t be too true or too false so their always be debate about it.
She corrects fake historians better appreciate her
@@srivenkateswaraswamy3403 Haha really!? Which fake historians are you talking about? She is just doing Hindu content and making India overrated in her content that's all!
lol, so even telling the real history or correcting the fake history is making things overrated what a mindset!!@@AaravGamezOffical why dont u make a channel by doing detailed study, and show no bias
The Turks also Deny that they commited genocide against the Armenians, Greeks and Assyrians. But 20 million people don't just disappear.
Greek mythology is one of the best and oldest in the world,and people doubting it are fools
This is from an indian btw
This lady is just out of: WhatsApp University of Andhbhakts 😂🤣
Yes she is 😉
Well it's your degree actually. Librandu
@@analleyboy bangali naki??
@@SAMRAT1989 ha re bhai
Oh yes. RSS U. Their women give birth to babies thru the Anus. That is they have such big buttholes.
Ancient nations are notorious for only recording victories and “forgetting” their losses.
Like Greece
@@Yeagerman9Not like Greece, you know 300? Yeah they lost that shit. We know they lost. They said they lost.
Roman left the chat
Carthage left the chat
Egypt left the chat
Assyrian left the chat
Persian left the chat
Greek left the chat
Learned that from the Europeans.
So how and when or even IF you ever found out about the Euro-Fake Mage**an NOT circumnavigating the planet and was killed by the Great Philippine Chieftain LapuLapu and his men on Mactan (Cebu) in April of 1521?
It was the first recorded REPULSION 🫷of European aggressions on record in World history🤘 !!
Alex was just a king of Macedonia...Greek had many city states..in the league of Corianth....if Alex lost a battle they would revolt and make kings themselves....which is pretty much what happened once he died
Just because you don't like history. Write your own one.
Alexander is literally one of the most studied humans ever and this line of thinking has been dispelled many times before.
Well in Punjab’s history, we were told about “Alexander the great” and that he is named “Sikandar” in the History of Punjab.
Tab Punjab nam ka state tha hi nhi...jo history tumne padhi h wo Angrezo ki likhi hai
@@amitbehl6099 there was no India either. Stop reading sanatan myths and believing them as facts.
@@jikkkjvghj chutiya insan Alexander India hi aya tha...India to bolte hi wo log h...hum to Bharat bolte aaye Hain apne Desh ko.
@@amitbehl6099 अरे मेरे भाई मैंने पंजाब का नाम इसलिए लिया कि तुम्हें पता चल जाएगा की जो अलैगज़ैंडर का पोरस के साथ युद्ध हुआ था व पंजाब की सरज़मीन पर हुआ था मुझे पता है तब पंजाब का नाम पंजाब नहीं था लेकिन ज़मीन तो यही थी न तो हमें इसका इतिहास पता है। और दूसरी बात अगर अंग्रेज़ों ने कोई इतिहास लिखा है, तो ये कहाँ लिखा है कि उन्होंने जो कुछ भी लेखा वो सब झूठ है? और अगर जो कुछ मैंने पढ़ा है अगर वो अंग्रेजों का लेखा है तो उसमें उन्होंने अलेक्ज़ेंडर के नाम को सिकंदर क्यों लिखा? The world’s first civilisation took place in the area of Punjab. And she is talking about the University of Takshila that is also in Punjab. And she says that it is not written by the university of Takshila that Alexander came here for her kind information Alexander came 700 years after the establishment of the university, the university may have ceased to exist by the time he came.
@@jikkkjvghj No India ?!?!?!?!?!? JNU se ho ya AMU se ? "Bharatavarsha" has existed as a very huge empire even before the west started as hunters and gathereres.
Sanatan myths ? yeah. Archealogical evidences like non-coastal rocks used in Ramasetu (your adam's bridge), discovery of Dwaraka the submerged city are all "myths" 'cuz the british master who $leep w!th y0ur m0m says so.
Villian will always be villian
If the hero tells the story
nah..
So you want to say that genghis khan's men told his story so genghis khan is a hero?
@@sumankarmakar3847for his men, yes
@@HECKTOOOOOR no he said if the hero tells the story then villain is always a villain. So it should be applicable in all cases. No exceptions.
@@sumankarmakar3847 see, it doesn't work like that there are a lot of people and to be loved or be a hero for everyone its impossible. It cannot be applicable to everything, For example : if a "hero" Saves 100 people and kills 1 "villain", the hero is still gonna be villain for the close ones of the " Villain ".
This may offend you so warning :
For india, there were a lot of freedom fighters example : Mahatma gandhi
He wanted peace, and his actions only intended peace but he was still a villain for the people who thought That non-violence can't kick all the britishers away. So for a Man who wanted to end the british rule he was a villain because Mahatma Gandhi did not use violence to kick britishers even when he had the power to do. But he was a hero for most of the india Because he tried to bring peace. So, the point being it depends on the person telling a story because there are a lot of different pov to see 1 thing.
So, Alexander wins the supposed battle and *let's Porus live* and *gives back the land?!* This behavior goes against Alexander's own past behavior...I call bullshit.
Why Should I believe A girl Over Every Other Historian In Whole World????
She really knows to argue with fallacies 🤣
Ever heard of Mauryan selucid war ?
Anything to get views
@@vikram_aditya9472 just need some brain to understand
Which you completely lack
there's a Greek Coin where Porus sitting on an elephant is impaling alex on a horse. It's ON A GREEK COIN. What more proof do you need?
@@vishalautade509Argument from ignorance, bias and personal incredulity.
"History is written by the victor"
AKA Alaxander the Great
If brits wouldnt bother to teach you how to write and read, still you would pick coconuts and pull rickshaws.
Do u know? mourya, Chola, Who were existed insanely good at education. Typical European 🤡🤡🤡
The Brits definitely came to India out of the kindness of their hearts to teach India how to read and write.
Yeah that's why India did not have the advanced veda's and stuff that the British had
Vedas are Russian not lndian...
@@albanveda6448 hahahah, dream on kid
When you write your history, you are the hero in it
Same applies to Brahmins and Sanskrit based puranas. You wrote it, so you are the hero. In reality, the native tribes of India are the true men of this soil
@@AS235DI yes absolutely they are the real heroes🗿🌚
@@AS235DI true.. most ppl don't understand this
@@AS235DIcorrect, the native tribes are the real owners of this soil but for a fact there is nothing to support your so-called Invasion theory of aryans. Chor aadmi...
God had made varn not cast system. There is a lot of difference between them
@@AS235DIyes it's applicable to all but It's may be true sometimes
Rewriting history through social media 😊
Yeah.. it's really annoying and so common now.
It's always black or brown people celebrating their history but completely unable to do so without it being at the expense of European/white history.
that's racism, but well most of history written by Europeans and History is not always written by victors, you have problem debating historical interpretations and perspectives@@EstbXCIII ?
🤡@@EstbXCIII
Except Greek no one said about this alexander and porus war😂😂
@@venkatesh114 Alexanders invasion is recorded not battle of king porus and no king will write down their defeat by saying alexander humbled king porus and Alexander gave back kingdom 😂😂😂
ALEXANDER THE BEST IN HISTORY
she needs to read a history book
Indians be like due to how biased they are:
Alexander conquered India
FALSE
Britain conquered all of India
FALSE
Vikramaditya empire conquered all of Asia
TRUE
Vikramaditya isn't even real lmao
People are gonna trigger from this 😁
I think it's just her confidence which makes us believe most of her videos. I really don't think she tells these things from verified sources😅😅😅
why do you 'think' so?
Verified sources means what ??
# madershachaap knowledge 😅
there's a Greek Coin where Porus sitting on an elephant is impaling alex on a horse. It's ON A GREEK COIN. What more proof do you need?
Thank you so much brother whatever you said it's true..
@@vashishthkumarsingh4890autism is a real thing...get help
It’s important to remember that Alexander had largely used only Greek troops he started with in his invasions of Persia and had obviously lost soldiers along the way after countless battles, by the time of his battle against king Porus he’d already been campaigning for 8 years and his soldiers wanted to come back home to Greece, he had further conquests in mind but died before he could continue, had he mobilised Persia’s large population into his military and got a few more thousand from Greece; he would’ve been more than a formidable match up against the fragmented Indian Kingdoms. Came from Greece all the way to the edge of India and he was only 32 years old by the time of his death.
She is a home schooled whatsapp history doctorate.
Alexander deserves the title The Great but the writers after his death exaggerated his exploits
Bro what do u think alexander did?
He connected india upto Europe. This gave urbanization. Mahajanpad period. Money economy. History is not about kings. It's about chain of events that led to people we are.
@@gyatak200 what Mahajanpadas?
They are Indian Origin Kingdoms not of Europeans and Go and Research about Rakhigarhi.
And don't say anything about Indian architecture ~ Thousands year old Temples are still standing.
@@gauravsharma_7 u r indian origin. But you may trade globally. Why? Because u follow economic system of currency exchange. Right. Alexander united central Asia. Now chandragupta defeated selucus nikator sitting in afgan. Married his daughter. Think why? Smoothe running of trade on silk route. Indian cotton and muslin was worn by Greeks. This pump of money made mauryan unite mahajanpad and become an empire.
@No One maybe. Alexander is right man at right place. A lot of circumstances evolved.
@@gyatak200 Bharat had trade relations with Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia too.
At that time when China was just rising and alot of Indian books they took to Europe at that time.
And I know Trade is important too sustain a country/civilization but this is a fact that India was connected with Cental Asia, Middle East and Far east before arrival of Greeks.
And Ancient Greek Religion shows similarity with Bhartiya culture.
Alexander defeated Porus.
The end
Alexander was seriously wounded in the war and Porus was nothing compared to the mighty magadha empire next to him. the greeks were terrified by Magadha and returned to where they came from
@@RadiomattoliDwaraka Correct.
@@RadiomattoliDwaraka they didn't return because they were "terrified", they returned because they were goddamn tired, simple as
Porus was he’s hardest challenge but Alexander still won
Keerthi History❌️❌️
Keerthi Stories✅️✅️
Yes porus defeated Alexander and won the whole world and became vikramadiya and established the Hindu rashtra in makka madina 🚩🚩
Other records which mention Alexander victory are all false.
In 2050 , rewriting history according to individual needs and requirements
😂😂
it will be so hard .so many pronouns
@Navdeep majority of rajpoots gave their daughters in marriage to mughals to save their kingdoms or to get a position in mughal courts , rajpoots joined mughal army to attack other Hindu kings.
@No One Lol
That's what indian nationalists are doing. Their entire history is fabricated. There'd be no india today if British hadn't come.
Yet, Alexander's legacy remains. "Iskander" in Persian and "Sikandar" in Punjabi are variants of Alexander's name.There would not be such a legacy if Alexander was like yet another the hundreds of foreign conquerers on Indian soil. i.e,just because our history doesn't explicitly mentioned Alexander doesn't mean his history is wrong.
Alexander and sikander is different . Bhosdike gulaam...sikandar was a king existed in Assyrian Empire...while Alexander came very late and from Macedonia nearby Greece..😂😂😂
SO TRUE BRO, JUST BECAUSE WE ARE INDIANS DOESN'T MEAN WE CAN TELL LIES, WE HAVE TO BE PROUD OF WHAT WE HAVE, NOT WHAT WE DIDN'T HAVE
May be the university students were preparing for exams while this war was happening. That’s why….
I really hate it when people mix nationalism with religion
Nowadays everyone is an expert at everything 😂😂😂
clearly . ..king porus defeated Alexander
but our communist historians r not interested in it🤗
i think u r expert at "Nothing"
yes
These people belive mythology is true and history is a lie. 🤢
Just like you na? Expert at being irritating
We Indian are very good at forgetting the history.
🥲💔
That hurts
well actually Indians weren't Interested in history writing many historical facts we see are majority from foreign writers Greek, Roman, Chiniese scholars.
@@preetiraut7700 🥲👍 so true, the smrirti and histroy written are considered fake. Like ramayan and mahabharat
@@shivkumar0810 bro Ramayan and Mahabharat are way old Itihas.
Mysteriously the losing side has no record of ever losing that battle so therefore it could not have happened!
there's a Greek Coin where Porus sitting on an elephant is impaling alex on a horse. It's ON A GREEK COIN. What more proof do you need?
Indians just have a huge tendency to live on past glory and are excessively patriotic.
@@arishemthejudge6780lol like you have recorded the number of losses you faced in your history. It's fascinating that you only put the wins and don't talk about the losses how's that possible
Bro this argument would be a valid if the battle of hydapses was the only thing that was not mentioned in indian records and if porus and Alexander were mentioned,but in this case porus and Alexander both are not mentioned at all in indian history .if porus Alexander were so important they would atleast have a mention in the indian records,but selucus nicator is mentioned several times in indian records, but there is no mention of Alexander, as if he was not existent,if indians were "EMBARRESED OF THEIR DEFEAT" and this battle was so important they would atleast mentioned porus and Alexander or even write their own pov over the war .iam not a native English speaker so please make do with my english.
@@alkapremlokre2988 they didn't mention because the indians didn't know how to read and write a history until Ashoka became a ruler.
Interesting Fact: King Porus' original name is Purushottama.
And he was descendant of King Puru, who was the brother of King Kuru.
The Kuru dynasty had the Pandavas and Kauravas.
@@utsavdhyani8839 🤣🤣🤣
Even after so much revelations in past 5-6 years and pro-Hindu system, the fact that we still refer to him as porus tells us that we have miles to go...
Purushottam of paurav chandravansh kshtriya clan.. paurav clan was the last of puru clan in which famous kuru clan taken most of the bharatvarsh history.
Maharaja purushottam was the last chandravansh kshtriya in the beginning of 28th kaliyug.
🤣😂🤣🤣
You do realise Alexander and the army didn't leave straight after the battle with Porus, right? His army travelled south and won more battles and founded new cities, including Bucephalia, in honour of his horse. They followed the Indus River, all the way to the Arabian Sea, built over 1000 ships to transport riches back to Babylon, and lost many men in the Gedrosian desert.
Only Pakistanis know the truth.
May be the Indian historians didn't felt it as a worthy battle to be written..
Probably
What if the records were burned?
@@rakeshram7435 well it's not a source of any sought knowledge to be preserved in any of the ancient universities then the burnt of evidences doesn't make any sense. ...the writings are preserved if it contains any knowledge (in ithihasa)...
@@RaviShankar-pq8ec How many battles did we came to know about from any records of Taxashila?
Ofcourse. It was like a kid blowing murga chhaap cracker at your door.
And u just shouted and he ran away
Porus wasn't a small king, Alexander won a narrow victory. His beloved horse was killed and he too was severely injured in the battle. He turned back because of some reasons
1 The climate of India specifically The Monsoon, it was the worst nightmare for the Greeks.
2 Mutiny in his army. His soldiers were too tired to carry on.
3 Chandragupta Maurya, his army was far greater than Alexander and he was a good general as compared to those who faced Alexander.
These are some possible reasons in my mind if there are more please tell me.
1. Well an army who could stand in deserts of iran/persia can't stand in the fields of plains? Cuz ? Of rain?
2. Soldiers don't just fight one after another... They stay.. get stable n then get in another fight... So the kingdom that Alexander's army just won doesn't have enough food n shelter to repair the army?
3. Well Magadh kingdom was well known in west.. regardless of this Alexander made through all wars n reach there and chose to not to fight? How could even be the case...
Feel free to add your points
@@captainvenom7252 1. Tropical climate brings more diseases, most of which would be totally unknown to the Greeks and they wouldn't even have the necessary immunities. In desert you just need water and food supply. And Persia isn't exactly a large desert like Arabia and had masses of civilised settlements where the army could resupply.
2. The mutinies happened in the back ranks, in present day Afghanistan and Western Pakistan. Not in the army he was commanding. He had to turn back so that his supply line doesn't get fucked. Any half competent general would prioritise that.
3. Alexander just barely survived his first encounter with elephants. And Nanda (Chandragupta wasn't yet there) had way more of them than Porus, who indeed ruled a much smaller kingdom. Proper intel on things like that was possible only in close proximity.
@@ADthehawk
Well i know i might sound harsh but regions where the army stayed known as Alexandria, were mostly arid, semi arid regions bro.... There were and there are no tropical wet regions n not even sub tropical regions...
And there's no new thing to die from a disease...
Perhaps last statement is exactly what i said,
Alexander got back cuz his army wasn't as strong as Nanda... Why to add such base less points that his soldiers were tired or afraid to die by diseases...
Why can't just stay with actual facts...
@@captainvenom7252 bro I think you don't know the atrocities of Monsoon. If you read the military history of India, Monsoon played very important role in military campaigns.
Yes his soldiers were tired but not physically but mentally, they were in war for years. Don't you know what was the condition of those soldiers who take part in World Wars.
Was there a Maurya empire already when Alexander came to India??
It was Magadh ruled by the Nandas.
Chandragupta came into the scene only after:
a) overthrowing the Nandas.
b) Alexander's death and his empire divided between his generals, with Seleucus Nikator getting the eastern stretches i.e, present day northwest India, Pakistan and possibly present day eastern Afghanistan.
Please feel free to correct me. So that I could correct myself where I am wrong. I'd be happy to learn and gain from you guys. 👍🏻
she created a new timeline lol
He left because he was unaware of India's vast land area..
He was assuming Ganges to be the end of Indian territory and was just shocked to know there is so much more to be conquered here.
Plus he did not have enough supplies and soldiers to continue any further.
Read history properly.
Little knowledge is always dangerous 😔
Smash the like button if y'all people agree with me.
I read this while I was preparing for UPSC.
I am sorry but, what you have read may not be correct. UPSC history syllabus is not from another world, it's similar to Ncert written by crooked pseudo historians.
Hmm finally someone who doesn't make up stories
That's the excuses Greeks make.
@@SerCrispinCole they didn't. They praised Porus for his bravery. And they were sore losers not to do that had they lost (look at their depictions of Persia).
Yes we agree I have also read the same...people like her today think themselves great historians and then mislead people on social media...thankfully people are stupid and get misleaded meanwhile she would be earning money by misleading people.....these are the people who don't accept their fault but only try to glorify themselves.....this is the reason why we were slaved for such a long period...
Chandragupta Maurya defeating Nandas was truly a big achievement
History is neither written by victors nor by losers, actually it is written by podcasters
"Asoka was "the greatest of kings" surpassing Alexander the great and Julius caesar and the other renowned emperor of the world "- H.G.Wells
A LION would go on living his life along its habit of being as majestic as he was always irrespective of what is the rumor.
but the war did happen lol
Adel whom did you Ask,Alexander or Porus😅😅😅😅
@@pawandeeprishi2608 I asked them both they said it happened
My girl is writing her own history 💀💀
Lol how tf did your alechander gave up the kingdom he won and also went back without continuing? 😂
@@Shubham-l1n Did you even watch the video?
Google is you friend@@Shubham-l1n
@@Shubham-l1n He didn't give it up, nor did he immediately turn back.
Yes 😂 she is just making the history overrated
Im sure they just didnt want to talk about their losses.
"Indian books didn't record it, therefore it's a lie" 😂
I mean India's entire history is about being conquered, why would you scrutinize just one more instance of it happening?
demm that hit hard
Indian history before the Br*ts:
@@Anti_Racist696 Being uncivilized barbarians who wipe their asses with their hands:
@@ravercorum20 early europeans trying not to catch 1000 STDs/diseases (impossible) :
@@Anti_Racist696 Show bobs and vegene:
If takshila doesn't have a record it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. A nice logical fallacy right here
🤣🤣🤣look whoes talking abt logical fallacy, one who thinks Alexander was a mmomin. 🤣🤣
@@aaryan_B055 he was an idol worshipper. Smh. Very dumb of you. Educate yourself.
@@aaryan_B055 He makes complete sense and his words are true. You speak nonsense, and do not show signs of intelligence.
@@sawe6051
U r an idiot nd brainless too. Takshila doesn't have the records abt Alexander is just a point in support of the evidences.
Intelligence is a far away from ur head, just use ur common sense nd ask any momin abt what I said. 🤣
@@aaryan_B055 tera kuch nhi ho skta research krni nhi hoti aise hi jhaadte rehte hain
I have been told that he only returned cause his men threatened to commit mutiny, and Alexander obliged, because it's a little hard to fight wars without an army
Uhhh... I'm a historian, and I studied that Alexander never made it no further than Bactria... He touched the Indus, but due to his armies fatigue, he turned back... He never invaded India 🇮🇳 or Bharat!!!!
If you are speaking about the borders of modern-day India, then yes. Alexander the Great never entered India. But if you talk about the borders of the Indian Subcontinent, which, apart from India, contains Sri Lanka, the Maldive islands, Nepal, Bengladesh, Bhutan and Pakistan, then no. Alexander the Great conquered a part of India...
You Indian Nationalists are all over the place. One day you claim Bharata is the entire world. Then next day it includes Afghanistan and Uzbekistan. The next day it is only Gujarat and eastward. It all depends on what serves the ego.
@@nerthus4685Indians are notoriously known for making up fake history
May be Porus didnt want anyone to mention about his loss to Alexandra. Just because it is in the past, dont forget that dishonesty was born with mankind.
👍👍
And you're confident about the Greeks being right and Indians being dishonest😂 This slave mentality
It was commonplace to not record your own defeats. In history, you can often tell if a nation is losing a war if their “absolute victories” are drawing closer and closer to their capital. It was also common to just not record losses also. Probably also likely to make records of victories which never happened also.
😂😂 do you even know a little bit of Indian history ?
India isnt one nation. Youd think an encounter with a foreigner would make historical texts. Not that I have am opinion either way. Just as possible that shit got lost
"History is a set of lies agreed upon"
-Napolean Bonaparte
No girl.....
No body told that story....
Lately ì happened to visit Nalanda at Bihar. What a design planning and aesthetics. The reminiscence itself is so beautiful. Felt like staying back there and studying. Goosebumps when you said Thakshasila… Bharat ❤
🥺♥️🙏🏼
Replying from Nalanda right now ✌️
Meanwhile look at the garbage buildings we construct these days by trying to shamelessly copy western "postmodernist" architecture. Look at how bland and uninspiring the new parliament building looks. Not a single trace of Indian architecture in it. Just one dumb box of concrete with stone tiles slapped onto it.
I lived in Patna for 5 years but couldn't visit Nalanda (bcz I was a student and my mom wouldn't have allowed to go far from town with friends) . I'll go later on
You definitely should
Alexander never "gave the kingdom back"to Porus. He allowed him to be essentially a local governor.
he had fear of indian empire called mauryan empire,his army start retaliation against alexander
@@GyanTvAmitIt was the Nanda empire,maurya conquered nanda empire later
Porus won the battle
@@krishbanerjee518 cope
@@alexdunphy3716 porus 💪💪💪
So....Alexander the Great comes to India, beats Porus in battle but is so impressed and respects him so much that he let him keep his kingdom even after defeat and she sees this as a terrible lie told by the Greeks.....honestly i think that is so wholesome. Out of all his Opponents Alexander found a King who fought with all his soul, courage and decided that such a man was worthy enough to continue ruling his kingdom. That in my opinion is incredible and the story i choose to believe ❤
Alexander also owes India 45 trillion dollars btw 😂
No your talking about the British I mean it’s a skill issue
At this point she can even deny the existence of Alexander 😂😂
Jealous of the fact she is telling? You should be. 😏
@@aayush135 facts😂 kid, facts are backed by proofs, only proof she has is her assumptions
@@roseangel1553 Everything mentioned in the books is also a fact without any proof. 😂
@@aayush135 whole scientific society is gonna disagree with you. Ex: gravity, you can see its proof everywhere
@@roseangel1553 Be sensible. 😒 I am talking about history books.
Mam, i think much of your information comes from WhatsApp University. Alexander did not give back the Kingdom to porus. Alexander made him a satrap or viceroy. Alexander faced mutiny from his soldiers and so he appointed Selucus as his representative in India and turned back, eventually dying in Egypt.
By your theory, why was Ambi’s kingdom also given to Porus?
@@Keerthihistorymam what is the fees at WhatsApp university, I also want to learn different kind of fake news there like you, and want to say india conquered the world
Alexander III of Macedon defeated Porus at the Battle of the Hydaspes and that's a historical fact...
Hindus were not even defeated at panipat in 1526 they just wanted to give their lands to be ruled by Turks 😂😂😂😂