"Your Name" & "DOB" or Date of Birth are separate events, which are in error written on your citation. This is the first part of BEA (Bills exchange Act). Process to treat 'Ticket" as Bill "Acceptance of Value".
Corey, thank you. If the people who are watching this video actually PAY CLOSE ATTENTION to what you have laid out, they will BENEFIT GREATLY. Thank you so much for taking the time to put this together. Much gratitude.
corey this is mind expanding!!! i just discovered all of this and it's absolutely amazing!! my wife and i are absorbing your every word. Thank you for your hard work brother, what you're doing is priceless. I think this is the answer as to what can be done to fix things. I wish to learn all of these things and help others around me, and together we CAN bring about a change for the better!!!
Welcome, if you enjoy this video then you will enjoy the podcast. listen to full shows for free at www.Agenda31.org, complimentary subscription required to download the 'how to make a common law ID' podcast.
The legal system is not at all what you think. Financial extortion sums it up. Study Admiralty law first. Study and learn as much as you can on your own. Dont rely on a lawyer. Read study and learn from the point of view that wright vs wrong does not apply here. Research corrupt courts and you will start to understand.
I just did almost the exact same thing here in Colorado. The Judge took my file so the clerk could not set a date for final hearing. This is something i learned through my studies. They convert the civil complaint into a criminal charge when you sign their court documents. If you don't sign they can't do anything. In my papers, I stated clearly that I did not consent to anyone entering a plea on my behalf. I also attached a fee schedule just to add teeth to my complaints. They said they would call me. My papers explicitly state that everything must be Certified mail and time limits on everything. This way I don't have to wait a year. I only have to wait three days.
The court clerk called and I explained that I was not consenting. I have filed a notice and 2 affidavits of truth, 1 delivered to the DA and the second one to the Referee, sometimes referred to as a magistrate, or judge acting a magistrate. I clearly stated my beliefs about what I believe to be a deceitful practice and named exactly what I thought was happening implicating all of them making sure to clearly state that this is an opinion and that it not yet a legal claim and reserve the right to file claims against them based on these understandings. I also cited a few of my Supreme Court rulings, CO cases and rules and some of the CO Revised Statutes. They have ignored everything and so I made that clear as well, that silence is considered dishonorable and disrespectful as servants of the people to ignore legitimate and timely complaints. Not the same way when you get something from them. Your better act or they will. Simple bias and prejudice. We just have to start pointing it out every time it happens.
Capital letters do matter, very much my friend. Consider the "U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual" which outlines that capital letters are used to identify trusts and corporations and such (fictitious entities).
William Vaughn, you nailed the purpose of this exactly. It is to call attention to the distinction between the FIRST MIDDLE LAST name construction required for all Notice to Appear forms, and the GIVEN SURNAME construction shown on a passport or Common Law ID in my video. The reason the court can get away with criminal activity over traffic matters, the state OWNS the person in the FIRST MIDDLE LAST construction, you are only able to get a certified copy of that person. Property has no rights.
Here in New Brunswick, Canada, the trick with foreclosure is that both the Mortgagee Deed and the tangible property (house) are vaguely called property, what is really going up for auction is the Mortgagee Deed, the real owner is duped into thinking they no longer have a claim on the house, so a bidder pays money for a piece of paper called a Mortgagee Deed, which is essentially worthless, because no payments are being made, and the bidder claims the house as salvage, as if abandoned at sea!
I feel frustrated because it seems like there is a lot of criticism from our fellow people about the freedom movement. I wish they understood it's not about winning or losing its about standing up for your God given rights, and fighting the slavery we're all under. They're are free people who do win their court cases. Unfortunately they are the minority because the system is so corrupt and the majority of the people just lay down and allow their freedom and hard earned money to just be taken. The constitution was put in place to protect us the people. It's not some sort of law synopsis to be skimmed over and bypassed. The government is supposed to be in place for the people, not the other way around. But no one will get their noses out of Facebook long enough to actually look around and see what's happening and be pissed off about it and do. Something. So let's all just be spoon fed their shit, while the rob and fuck us in the ass with our iPhones. Because that's just easier than actually giving a fuck about ourselves and each other.
Shannon Shannon its not your "god given right" to drive in any manor you see fit on public roads.... if you want to stand up for the rights of unlicensed un insured and reckless drivers, go ahead its a free country.
@Grezski - No I wasn't required to speak with the sheriff regarding this case. The complaint I filed was based on procedure of the deputies involved in the citation, and the conversation was related only to the complaint. In fact by the time I met with the sheriff, the appearance date had already passed.
hello good afternoon Thank s foremost for share great sources of Valuable informations As you are Skilled in law I d like bring a personal injury lawsuit troubles to you help me during 3 Years I am fighting in Japan Court to get my work accident settled But My Lawyer is not Knowledgeable in works accidents etc... I am helping him with all the most Papers to bring to labor standard Office;governament Offices etc...90% of all is my Job I acting as a Paralegal. I d like ask you about if a Strawman can suing a employer for work injury and general damages indemnity ? the law siad if you re injured becouse of your employer intentional or egregious conduct you might be anle to bring a personal injury lawsuit Against your Employer if your Employer does not carry workers compensation on insurance you might be Able to sue your employer in civel court or collect money. So, I already Win the company in Court,But I need change Court and judge To get paid . This case will start Sooner . My questions is > If I am a strawman and The has a control of me and I am in situation to get rewards about the damages i suffered How to use the Power of Corporation to make it more fast/Quicly.get Paid ? wich kind Legal Remedy words/law/power of attorney/power of arguments/ Demand of Oath of Office Letter to get Paid for any Loss or Damage incurred in This Matter..?? Thanks in Advance Sorry for My poor English I am doing my best to improve> Hope hearing from you best regards Andre Costa Tokyo Japan
Thanks for the comment, your observations are not incorrect, however in this case I was specifically referring to your relationship with gov-co when you sign a personal check. Because you are not considered to be the person holding the account when you sign a check, you are human and not gov-co property (as evidenced by 'authorized signature' in micro print forming the signature line). My reference was not to debt, but the political relationship recognized when signing a check.
Who gives a fuck if the judge is pissed off? Who gives two fucks? I could give three fucks less about what the fuck any Article I court judge says. They're ACTUALLY an Executive Trust Administrator. Better follow us on Facebook. The powerful language that we use in our Affidavits, the court can't do shit with it. Do your research. ESPECIALLY study the Statutes at Large, the United States Constitution, and the Federalist Papers.
The court has joined the cases with a charge of driving without a license. That is the reason for the appearances that are showing on the record. The no driver license charge has many defects in it, primarily the original citation was rejected by the court due to the lack of the accused signature, so the officer did an amendment and a direct file. This is something new, while my strategy has worked for several years, I now realize I should have used the time opportunity to dismiss, I didn't.
The common law ID I created is foreign to all government operations and they treat it as such. You can't open a bank account with it, you can't get government benefits with it, you can't drive with it. But as I said before, it is recognized by the gov-co as a valid ID from a foreign jurisdiction.
They also apply to you if you are subject to, or are in the United States. Are you a 'resident' of the the State of Michigan? Are you subject to the United States? Are you employed? All of these questions can be used to establish jurisdiction and therefore place you under the confines of the code that only applies to them.
Yes, the case is still open. Given the amount of time that has passed and no prosecution, there are now several opportunities to dismiss. I haven't pursued closing the case because of the educational opportunity.
PetetheTrainer: My opinion is the citation is evidence of an obligation, but is not an actual contract that can be rescinded. The system is much more subtle, they obtain your voluntary signature binding you to appear as the corporate fiction long before you are pulled over for a broken tail light.
Jon Stone, you're correct. They're just a mere Private Contractor. In fact, thanks to Rod Class, he got the 10th Circuit Court to about on the record Thai police are in fact Private Contractors.
I met my great grandfather, he always referred to his age as 'being in my 90th year" and used the month he was conceived as a starting point. I think this was for religious reasons (he was born at least nine months after his parents were married), but there is a legal point to the conception date. In common law, an unborn child has rights. Establishing your conception date is a simple way to demonstrate you are protecting all your rights, even the ones you had before birth, IMO.
Yes, however I would word it that I presented the defendant, identified by the birth certificate to the court. representing would change the meaning of the sentence enough that I would be concerned about the bar accusing me of practicing law. But essentially, without splitting hairs on the words in a non commercial environment, your observation is spot on. I think now would be a good time to conclude this case as the state has had plenty of time to bring a prosecution.
PED STOP = Pedestrian stop : This was a non moving violation. However the citation is the same as a traffic violation in CA, it just doesn't go on your insurance.
As long as you play by the rules and a judge agrees with your actions, you can do anything you want. Learning the rules takes dedication, humility, tremendous respect for their authority, and a much better understanding of American history than we get from the public fool system. Learn the rules and this is a really awesome place to live.
No, haven't done anything with this as far as the courts are concerned. As I said in the video, this file has no effect on me (and I don't worry that it says "open civil assessment" on court website - this case is dead. My concern was ensuring the court would not be able to issue an arrest warrant for FTA. I might revisit this after the appearance date anniversary, another few months out.
You are correct regarding the tangent - traffic violations are not criminal in nature. I have friend who has taken a different tactic, and I believe he has cracked the code on destroying every traffic citation without the extreme nature of my theory. His theory is this; traffic citations are not criminal, however the officer must arrest you in order to obtain your signature for release. An arrest for non criminal action is not valid.
I don't claim to be exempt from any jurisdiction or law, however if there is an administrative complaint that names me a responsible party then I will enforce my rights to have my adversary prove jurisdiction. This case was non-traffic, and all the charges were non-criminal (open container at the beach, etc.) I prefer not to elaborate on the charges, however the entire court case is a available via CA Public Records Act.
I doubt that this case is forgotten, if they did forget I have certainly reminded them many times, including an exchange with the CEO of the Superior Court who apologized in writing for the courts action regarding elements of this case. The point of this exercise and posting is to educate people on who they are in common law and that an appearance, as defined by the legal definition of the word appearance, does not mean a requirement to be physically in front of the judge.
as far as I know, the choice of using Authorized Signature or Agent is personal. Both have the same effect in displaying that you are acting on the behalf of someone in a legal capacity, but that you are not that person.
sounds like you nailed it. As of right now there is no controversy with the traffic dept. commissioner regarding the appearance which is the focus of this post.
No, getting the court stamp was not a simple affair and I was nearly tricked into giving them another appearance date (check the court record, you will see the last hearing was cancelled). I was however able to get it filed, and followed up with a complaint against the court staff involved. This is not a court friendly strategy, so don't expect tea and crumpets to be served by the clerk after filing. In other words, if you don't know how to stand your ground, you might need more study.
My theory is the appearance already happened as evidenced by the court stamped document (description box link) on the date listed on the citation. If the appearance happened without my personal presence there, my theory is that I have no obligation to visit with the commissioner.
I haven't seen that before, it is probably new in California. Each case would be different in NY. 1: Open container in public. 2: Driving without a licence. Especially since one is actual traffic legislation, and the other is more civil-local code.
Today was my scheduled court date. I went to the clerk's office to get the papers stamped, and I was immediately treated with skepticism by the clerk. He initially said he couldn't receive the papers, and kept asking questions such as, "Where is 'John Doe'?" and "He's supposed to be in court now". When I asked if he was refusing to stamp/receive them he immediately stamped them, but told me they must be delivered to the prosecutor, and again refused to physically receive them.
The document was created using Word. The template is called "Pleading Paper" I downloaded it from microsoft's office website for free. After I received a stamp from the clerk on my copy of the receipt and observed the other copy (court copy) receive a stamp as well, I left.
This is where I mess up. I went to the courtroom and asked the bailiff if I could present the papers to the prosecutor. He scanned over them and asked me similar questions, to see my ID (declined), if I was "one of those sovereign citizens" (BIG decline), etc. and became increasingly hostile. He essentially told me I could "go to court and deal with my business" or leave and he would have the judge issue a bench warrant, and would "personally drag me from my house".
I have no idea what happened when the commissioner called the defendant's name, as I never entered the courtroom (actually it isn't a courtroom, it is a department room). All I did was take the document to the window and got it filed. It wasn't like they were happy to accommodate me, this is not to their advantage so there was some 'conversation' that took place prior to getting the document stamped. In other words, don't expect smiling faces when you file this type of appearance.
Yes, this works for traffic cases. I filed my paperwork with the traffic court clerk, like you would do the same thing. The artist at the beginning of the video is Chris Geo from his album Global Resistance.
Cal Gov Code § 82048 (a) "Public official" means every member, officer, employee or consultant of a state or local government agency. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), "public official" does not include the following: (1) A judge or court commissioner in the judicial branch of government. (2) A member of the Board of Governors and designated employees of the State Bar of California. (3) A member of the Judicial Council. (4) A member of the Commission on Judicial Performance, provided that he or she is subject to the provisions of Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 6035) of Chapter 4 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code as provided in Section 6038 of that article. (5) A federal officer or employee serving in an official federal capacity on a state or local government agency. Cal Gov Code § 82049 "State agency" means every state office, department, division, bureau, board and commission, and the Legislature.
Ssn708, the UCC governs all commercial negotiations and the traffic summons is a contract to the proceedings of the court adminstrative process... the word "bench" means bank.
Yes, there were two different filings. On the 1st of Sep I filed a copy of the complaint filed against the arresting officers, a copy of the commissioners Oath and a copy of my non political ID. On the 8th, the appearance document was filed. I will work on a video to create and use a non political ID and get that posted soon. Thanks for the comments, think freedom.
I walked up to the traffic court clerk window with two copies. One for the court, and one for my records. The clerk stamped both of them, kept the court copy and I retained my copy (the one you find in the video). As far as what happens after that, I don't care. If they say there wasn't an appearance, I would enter a copy of my stamped document to show the appearance requirement was met. Fear is the ultimate tool. I was mentally prepared for a few days in the pokie if I made a mistake.
@altops It is vitally important to start with the premise that you have done something wrong if you don't get remedy. For example, whenever you receive any type of benefit from the government, you usually sign for that benefit. Your signature then is used on some sort of adhesion contract where you waive certain rights. I have dealt with every signature I can recall ever giving the government, either modifying it or rescinding it. My goal is to have no direct contracts with the government.
Although I was polite with the bailiff the entire time, he would not let me speak, and I got the sense if I didn't walk out or sit down he was going to arrest me right there. I walked back down to the clerk's office again, handed the paper to a different clerk, told them I was leaving them their copy (both were stamped), and walked out. I have an idea the entry never made it to court, either way, I was found guilty (just a slightly bigger fine). Sorry for triple posting.
If you were in front of the judge, and identified yourself as the person on the citation then the judge is correct. Very important you pay close attention to all the words used, why they are used and figure out exactly why this didn't work. You only have control over what you did wrong and what you need to learn.
@DAWATCHMEN **NOTICE** This is a posting on the internet. A defense in court of "I saw this on the internet" will not be effective. There is no legal advice on this posting, there is however a discussion of legal concepts, if you are unable to determine the difference you should seek competent legal counsel before applying any of the information on this posting. - There you go DAWATCHMEN, your own personal disclaimer just for you, I hope you feel special now.
In CA Commercial Code Section 9307(h) defines the physical location of the United States. Also CA Vehicle Code Section 21052 defines who is subject to the vehicle code. Finding statutes similar for the State of Michigan will go a long way in helping you find the remedy
I took mine in personally, however if I find myself in a similar situation again, I will mail it in certified mail, return receipt with a third party affidavit of mailing giving enough time to get a conformed copy from the court before the appearance date.
Hey I am in Texas also! Tell your son to appear and DEMAND a verified criminal complaint. He cannot be prosecuted without one unless he has already entered a plea. When you enter a plea you agree to be prosecuted.
Even more infuriating is that there is a crown corporation, in Canada which insures every Home loan to a Mortgagees. Every mom and pop Mortgagor (the one who actually owns the House) gives a Mortgage to a financial institution, they pay an extra 5%, to cover the one time insurance payment to CHMC, Canadian Housing Mortgage Corporation. If the Mortgagor defaults on payment, the Bank or private lender gets payed in full including all interests they expected to earn(300% interest), in one lump sum.
Skilo, I had the same problem as you were getting. Took a while, but I DID find the case and it is filed with the Orange County courts. What you need to do is go to the home page of OC Courts. Then, click on the link for Online Case Access with the red folder design near the bottom of the page. Then Criminal and Traffic Case Access, Accept Terms, and then use that search box to find it. Comes right up. Corey, it's confusing because the page has multiple search engines and not all find the case
Well done, your research and comment is appreciated. My goal is to learn from this exercise and your efforts are appreciated. The names in the context of the court record are a product of their errors, and not intentional on my part. I established the validity of my identity (self created non political common law ID) which claimed and was acted upon to aquire domicile long before this contact. My focus on this case is the original State of California (1849) exists and is recognized.
hey dude thanks a lot for taking the time to do this. I have a question, I went to your website and checked out the documents and the actual citation where you sign your signature, there was just a little bit that I couldn't make out, I believe we have "without prejudice UCC 1-308 By: Corey Eib rush signature" I might be mistaken on something in there, mainly the last part, Rush signature? ehhh PS I dont live far from Laguna Beach if you give consultations (:
Hi Ian, the word is not Rush, it is 'Auth' short for Authorized Signature. The same term used as the signature line on your personal checks - get a magnifying glass, or scan a check at high resolution and magnify the line you will see the same term. Here is the relevant CA code on a signature by an agent that is 'authorized' to sign on behalf of a principle: | www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=com&group=03001-04000&file=3401-3420 Send a private message regarding meetings, there are several public events I attend in the OC area.
Great observation Dane. The special appearance description is slightly off however. A special appearance, from my understanding, is related to determine jurisdiction only. So after further study, the term "appearing specially" on the plea document is actually null, because the defendant entered a plea of 'defendant does not plead.' From what I have learned since, there was no need for the special appearance wording and it would have been more proper to just write 'defendant appears' instead.
The only person I care that agrees with me is a judge. So far I find no evidence that a judge disagrees with me. If you think what you have found would cause a judge to disagree with elements presented here, i suggest you not consider the use of the strategy presented.
@seaneire The only government issued ID I ever use is a passport, this reasoning is based on the legal difference between a passport (federal ID) and State ID. The federal ID does not give an address, and uses the title 'given name' and 'surname' where a state ID uses the title 'first' and 'last' name. Your first name, is the name on the birth certificate, and the birth (berth) cert is government property, as I said in the video I will never identify myself voluntarily as government property.
You don't need a template. When you understand from research what the document is, it will be clear what you will need on it to make it valid. I know this might be a frustrating answer, however I promise if you figure it out you will be grateful the answer wasn't provided. It is the research that gives you the depth of knowledge needed to play this game of traveling free
I don't think there is such a law regarding signature being rescinded in 3 days, but I am certain that the signature on the citation is not the problem, it is the signature on your driver license application that may be a better target of your research.
I don't know about New York, but here in Cali I just walked up to the window and filed the documents. I said I didn't have to see the judge because it wasn't me that was summonsed on the citation (the reason for my qualified signature on the citation).
Answer: When those who enter into contracts with the government and don't want to honor those contracts or recognize that our founding fathers earned the unlimited right to contract. The unlimited right to contract is a serious weapon, but if you have the dangerous end pointed the wrong way, things don't work out so good. A desire for liberty is the foundation of my studies, if you want to be left alone, as I do, then clear up your contracts and properly protect your inalienable rights.
Clue: Check Blacks Law Dictionary for the Legalese meaning of "certificate" also "License", as in "Marriage License" (the adhesion contract with the government, your parents signed, probably 9 months before you were born).
Yes there is a lot you can do. I fought a lot of tickets before finally rescinding my drivers license, and one of the best resources I found was a book from Nolo Press called "Fight Your Ticket and Win." Lots of great info, and the best $20 I have ever spent on a book. Find a copy that is specific to your state. RE the rude FHP officer, you can get a copy of the audio they recorded during the stop, if there is enough to it after you hear the audio, you can file a complaint.
Corey - good job! Small (or big) steps like this help put a stop to the corruption and oppressiveness of the courts and the nonsense behind infractions. What is the current status of your efforts? Thanks!
@altops Article 1 Section 10 of the constitution, the State may not impair the obligation of contracts. I have rescinded or modified all known contracts with the government. Most people who have problems are 1. incompetent before law 2. don't realize their contractual obligations. My suggestion is to first look at what you have signed before placing blame on police for them doing their job. My experience with the sheriff, local police and customs has been very positive.
@dcg1901, Thanks for taking the time to post those codes. 12500 has no geographical limitation on it. In theory that code section would apply to the entire world, which we know it doesn't. CVC Section 21052 enumerates to whom the code applies (and it's application isn't in a geographical sense, the code only applies in a political sense). I am neither an employee of the state, nor am I a political subdivision of the state as I do not identify myself as the person on the birth certificate.
In the days when common law prevailed, freemen would identify their age based on date of conception. If anyone went to check the family bible, it would be easy to see if the parents were married prior to conception. This was a very important part of someone's life in the early days.
he was fined $2300 for whatever tickets he got and for not showing up. he didn't get away with anything, and there's no piece of paper that's going to allow you to not show up for court.
The reason the court could not enter a plea in this case is the defendant was presented competently, met the appearance requirement and did not enter a plea. This did not give the commissioner jurisdiction to enter a plea. What Country is your domicile?
I rescinded my signature with the DMV in writing, sent via USPS certified mail return receipt. You can get an idea of the format of the letter I wrote by reading the pdf "Errant Sovereigns Handbook." I would suggest however that before you take this course of action you determine if there is any other application that may bind you to the jurisdiction of the state.
Exactly. If I provided start and end points using this strategy (very dangerous if you don't know what you are doing), someone would no doubt try to duplicate my efforts without knowing what to do if the judge changed the game (and believe me they will change the game). You have to think on your feet to do this. You have to know how to stay in the battle, and stay out of jail. That only comes from serious study and confidence that your knowledge base will protect you, not some video on TH-cam.
The only criticism I have with this, is that the appearance is not mandatory. If your appearance is mandatory, then the court may issue a bench warrant. However, if it was mandatory; John Doe did appear through paperwork. How could the court prove that he didnt appear?
Yes, however it is reasonable to say that conception happened circa 9 months prior to birth. My common law identification has the date of conception listed as month and year only, picking an exact date would likely not be accurate so it is not on the ID
Corey, Why do they still have an active case open since Jan 23, 2014 when this incident was back in 2011? It still says arraignment but the items are for infractions a total of (23) hearing since the first. I thought after one year, you can move to dismiss them. Is this right? Also do you have a website with you filings on it the OCCourts does not display the images of the filings you submitted to the court. Can you direct me to the site?
Rich A - according to my interpretation of law, yes I thought at the time of filming this I could move to dismiss after one year. The Superior court has responded, by changing the game midstream. The filings I submitted were summarily dismissed by the superior court, taking this to another level. I discuss these issues regularly on a podcast I cohost with Todd McGreevy. Check out show archives at Agenda31.org #huntingcommunists
Thanks for this video corey. I have two questions, 1) How do I make a new I.D. like the one you show? do you have a sample form i could imitate? 2) How did you rescinded your signature on the form DL-44? although I live in New York i am sure there is not that much of a difference. I am NOT asking these questions as legal advice, it is just for entertainment purposes.
The supreme court ruled that at the moment Cornwallis left the battlefield during the revolutionary war, all the men of the land became sovereign, however without subjects. In my video I am not referring to those 'sovereigns' - rather I am referring to the dangerous radical sovereigns such as "Jerry Kane." I have met many Sheriffs and Police chiefs in the past year, and I am thankful for what they do, they protect us from "sovereigns" such as Jerry Kane.
I have read the same thing. I determined that to be a rabbit hole (personal opinion) because the case is brought in the name of the People, and the commissioner works for the State. Doesn't mean you aren't correct, I just didn't pursue that course of action. Have you tried that approach?
thanks for the props arviagant13. The word appear as used in court does not mean physically show up, it means to submit to (at least that is the level of my knowledge currently). However the issue of competence is at play, and that is why the citation in this video was signed the way it was. Take care not to drive faster than your headlights with this legal stuff, before using this strategy, read a book by Nolo Press = Fight Your Ticket and Win. There you will find strategies to extend.
I took it to the clerk's window. However I would caution you at this point - just getting the paperwork in is only part of the game... make sure you don't exceed your knowledge base and create more trouble than necessary, or be prepared to learn from your mistakes. If I found myself unable to file in person, I would mail it as described above.
Just a question, there have been some resent case Hearings on this case, 2013 Hearings: 07/31/2013 08:30 AM Arraignment - H8 Heard 08/01/2013 02:30 PM Arraignment - H7 Heard 08/08/2013 08:30 AM Arraignment - H7 Heard have you been appearing still?
This case is open and verifiable in court. Perhaps you should contact the court and inquire as to why they have not issued a warrant for failure to appear. The code violations are clear in this case, if there is a failure to appear, a warrant shall be issued according to the code. No warrant, because the law was followed and the appearance requirement was met. Dont' know how to make this more transparent, just contact the court and verify.
"Your Name" & "DOB" or Date of Birth are separate events, which are in error written on your citation. This is the first part of BEA (Bills exchange Act). Process to treat 'Ticket" as Bill "Acceptance of Value".
Corey, thank you. If the people who are watching this video actually PAY CLOSE ATTENTION to what you have laid out, they will BENEFIT GREATLY. Thank you so much for taking the time to put this together. Much gratitude.
corey this is mind expanding!!!
i just discovered all of this and it's absolutely amazing!! my wife and i are absorbing your every word.
Thank you for your hard work brother, what you're doing is priceless. I think this is the answer as to what can be done to fix things.
I wish to learn all of these things and help others around me, and together we CAN bring about a change for the better!!!
Welcome, if you enjoy this video then you will enjoy the podcast. listen to full shows for free at www.Agenda31.org, complimentary subscription required to download the 'how to make a common law ID' podcast.
The legal system is not at all what you think. Financial extortion sums it up. Study Admiralty law first. Study and learn as much as you can on your own. Dont rely on a lawyer. Read study and learn from the point of view that wright vs wrong does not apply here. Research corrupt courts and you will start to understand.
thank you for standing up for our rights and educating!
I just did almost the exact same thing here in Colorado. The Judge took my file so the clerk could not set a date for final hearing. This is something i learned through my studies. They convert the civil complaint into a criminal charge when you sign their court documents. If you don't sign they can't do anything. In my papers, I stated clearly that I did not consent to anyone entering a plea on my behalf. I also attached a fee schedule just to add teeth to my complaints. They said they would call me. My papers explicitly state that everything must be Certified mail and time limits on everything. This way I don't have to wait a year. I only have to wait three days.
The court clerk called and I explained that I was not consenting. I have filed a notice and 2 affidavits of truth, 1 delivered to the DA and the second one to the Referee, sometimes referred to as a magistrate, or judge acting a magistrate. I clearly stated my beliefs about what I believe to be a deceitful practice and named exactly what I thought was happening implicating all of them making sure to clearly state that this is an opinion and that it not yet a legal claim and reserve the right to file claims against them based on these understandings. I also cited a few of my Supreme Court rulings, CO cases and rules and some of the CO Revised Statutes. They have ignored everything and so I made that clear as well, that silence is considered dishonorable and disrespectful as servants of the people to ignore legitimate and timely complaints. Not the same way when you get something from them. Your better act or they will. Simple bias and prejudice. We just have to start pointing it out every time it happens.
aquapontif Let us know how prison was when you get out.
aquapontif Update on this case?
looneyburgmusic
coreyeib So I noticed the website you have in the info is no longer working. I am guessing it was taken down when you went to jail.
i wish i knew how you guys come up with this stuff where can i study this??
your idea to "identify" yourself using a notary and two witnesses is indeed superb :) thumbs up from British Columbia (Canada)
Capital letters do matter, very much my friend. Consider the "U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual" which outlines that capital letters are used to identify trusts and corporations and such (fictitious entities).
William Vaughn, you nailed the purpose of this exactly. It is to call attention to the distinction between the FIRST MIDDLE LAST name construction required for all Notice to Appear forms, and the GIVEN SURNAME construction shown on a passport or Common Law ID in my video. The reason the court can get away with criminal activity over traffic matters, the state OWNS the person in the FIRST MIDDLE LAST construction, you are only able to get a certified copy of that person. Property has no rights.
Hey Corey!! Is this case still open???
Here in New Brunswick, Canada, the trick with foreclosure is that both the Mortgagee Deed and the tangible property (house) are vaguely called property, what is really going up for auction is the Mortgagee Deed, the real owner is duped into thinking they no longer have a claim on the house, so a bidder pays money for a piece of paper called a Mortgagee Deed, which is essentially worthless, because no payments are being made, and the bidder claims the house as salvage, as if abandoned at sea!
You might want to try putting brackets around your signature on tickets. 4 corners, rule!
where can one learn more about the 4 corners rule?
Thanks for checking it out, yes this is very much a real case.
I'm so confused!
Is that really your first and last name?
It does get better but only if you're willing to do the research. The topic of the straw man is an illusive concept to the many unfortunately.
I feel frustrated because it seems like there is a lot of criticism from our fellow people about the freedom movement.
I wish they understood it's not about winning or losing its about standing up for your God given rights, and fighting the slavery we're all under.
They're are free people who do win their court cases.
Unfortunately they are the minority because the system is so corrupt and the majority of the people just lay down and allow their freedom and hard earned money to just be taken.
The constitution was put in place to protect us the people. It's not some sort of law synopsis to be skimmed over and bypassed.
The government is supposed to be in place for the people, not the other way around.
But no one will get their noses out of Facebook long enough to actually look around and see what's happening and be pissed off about it and do. Something.
So let's all just be spoon fed their shit, while the rob and fuck us in the ass with our iPhones.
Because that's just easier than actually giving a fuck about ourselves and each other.
Shannon Shannon its not your "god given right" to drive in any manor you see fit on public roads.... if you want to stand up for the rights of unlicensed un insured and reckless drivers, go ahead its a free country.
That is not the meaning of my statement. God Bless.
@Grezski - No I wasn't required to speak with the sheriff regarding this case. The complaint I filed was based on procedure of the deputies involved in the citation, and the conversation was related only to the complaint. In fact by the time I met with the sheriff, the appearance date had already passed.
hello good afternoon
Thank s foremost for share great sources of Valuable informations
As you are Skilled in law I d like bring a personal injury lawsuit
troubles to you help me during 3 Years I am fighting in Japan
Court to get my work accident settled
But My Lawyer is not Knowledgeable in works accidents etc... I am
helping him with all the most Papers to bring to labor standard
Office;governament Offices etc...90% of all is my Job I acting as a
Paralegal.
I d like ask you about if a Strawman can suing a employer for work
injury and general damages indemnity ?
the law siad if you re injured becouse of your employer intentional or
egregious conduct you might be anle to bring a personal injury lawsuit
Against your Employer if your Employer does not carry workers
compensation on insurance you might be Able to sue your employer in
civel court or collect money.
So, I already Win the company in Court,But I need change Court and
judge To get paid .
This case will start Sooner .
My questions is > If I am a strawman and The has a control of me and I am in situation to get rewards about
the damages i suffered How to use the Power of Corporation to
make it more fast/Quicly.get Paid ?
wich kind Legal Remedy words/law/power of attorney/power of arguments/ Demand of
Oath of Office Letter to get Paid for any Loss or Damage incurred
in This Matter..??
Thanks in Advance
Sorry for My poor English I am doing my best to improve>
Hope hearing from you
best regards
Andre Costa
Tokyo
Japan
Thanks for the comment, your observations are not incorrect, however in this case I was specifically referring to your relationship with gov-co when you sign a personal check. Because you are not considered to be the person holding the account when you sign a check, you are human and not gov-co property (as evidenced by 'authorized signature' in micro print forming the signature line). My reference was not to debt, but the political relationship recognized when signing a check.
Who gives a fuck if the judge is pissed off? Who gives two fucks? I could give three fucks less about what the fuck any Article I court judge says. They're ACTUALLY an Executive Trust Administrator. Better follow us on Facebook. The powerful language that we use in our Affidavits, the court can't do shit with it. Do your research. ESPECIALLY study the Statutes at Large, the United States Constitution, and the Federalist Papers.
Brian... you wrote "better follow us"... but didn't tell us where or provide a link!!!!!
please share an address or link...
The court has joined the cases with a charge of driving without a license. That is the reason for the appearances that are showing on the record. The no driver license charge has many defects in it, primarily the original citation was rejected by the court due to the lack of the accused signature, so the officer did an amendment and a direct file.
This is something new, while my strategy has worked for several years, I now realize I should have used the time opportunity to dismiss, I didn't.
the new black.. wow. nice info..
The common law ID I created is foreign to all government operations and they treat it as such. You can't open a bank account with it, you can't get government benefits with it, you can't drive with it. But as I said before, it is recognized by the gov-co as a valid ID from a foreign jurisdiction.
They also apply to you if you are subject to, or are in the United States. Are you a 'resident' of the the State of Michigan? Are you subject to the United States? Are you employed? All of these questions can be used to establish jurisdiction and therefore place you under the confines of the code that only applies to them.
Yes, the case is still open. Given the amount of time that has passed and no prosecution, there are now several opportunities to dismiss. I haven't pursued closing the case because of the educational opportunity.
PetetheTrainer: My opinion is the citation is evidence of an obligation, but is not an actual contract that can be rescinded. The system is much more subtle, they obtain your voluntary signature binding you to appear as the corporate fiction long before you are pulled over for a broken tail light.
Jon Stone, you're correct. They're just a mere Private Contractor. In fact, thanks to Rod Class, he got the 10th Circuit Court to about on the record Thai police are in fact Private Contractors.
I met my great grandfather, he always referred to his age as 'being in my 90th year" and used the month he was conceived as a starting point. I think this was for religious reasons (he was born at least nine months after his parents were married), but there is a legal point to the conception date. In common law, an unborn child has rights. Establishing your conception date is a simple way to demonstrate you are protecting all your rights, even the ones you had before birth, IMO.
Yes, however I would word it that I presented the defendant, identified by the birth certificate to the court. representing would change the meaning of the sentence enough that I would be concerned about the bar accusing me of practicing law.
But essentially, without splitting hairs on the words in a non commercial environment, your observation is spot on. I think now would be a good time to conclude this case as the state has had plenty of time to bring a prosecution.
PED STOP = Pedestrian stop : This was a non moving violation. However the citation is the same as a traffic violation in CA, it just doesn't go on your insurance.
As long as you play by the rules and a judge agrees with your actions, you can do anything you want. Learning the rules takes dedication, humility, tremendous respect for their authority, and a much better understanding of American history than we get from the public fool system. Learn the rules and this is a really awesome place to live.
No, haven't done anything with this as far as the courts are concerned. As I said in the video, this file has no effect on me (and I don't worry that it says "open civil assessment" on court website - this case is dead. My concern was ensuring the court would not be able to issue an arrest warrant for FTA. I might revisit this after the appearance date anniversary, another few months out.
You are correct regarding the tangent - traffic violations are not criminal in nature. I have friend who has taken a different tactic, and I believe he has cracked the code on destroying every traffic citation without the extreme nature of my theory. His theory is this; traffic citations are not criminal, however the officer must arrest you in order to obtain your signature for release. An arrest for non criminal action is not valid.
I imagine with your superior knowledge of this subject, you should be present in court on the day of the appearance of your next citation.
I don't claim to be exempt from any jurisdiction or law, however if there is an administrative complaint that names me a responsible party then I will enforce my rights to have my adversary prove jurisdiction. This case was non-traffic, and all the charges were non-criminal (open container at the beach, etc.) I prefer not to elaborate on the charges, however the entire court case is a available via CA Public Records Act.
I doubt that this case is forgotten, if they did forget I have certainly reminded them many times, including an exchange with the CEO of the Superior Court who apologized in writing for the courts action regarding elements of this case. The point of this exercise and posting is to educate people on who they are in common law and that an appearance, as defined by the legal definition of the word appearance, does not mean a requirement to be physically in front of the judge.
as far as I know, the choice of using Authorized Signature or Agent is personal. Both have the same effect in displaying that you are acting on the behalf of someone in a legal capacity, but that you are not that person.
sounds like you nailed it. As of right now there is no controversy with the traffic dept. commissioner regarding the appearance which is the focus of this post.
No, getting the court stamp was not a simple affair and I was nearly tricked into giving them another appearance date (check the court record, you will see the last hearing was cancelled). I was however able to get it filed, and followed up with a complaint against the court staff involved. This is not a court friendly strategy, so don't expect tea and crumpets to be served by the clerk after filing.
In other words, if you don't know how to stand your ground, you might need more study.
My theory is the appearance already happened as evidenced by the court stamped document (description box link) on the date listed on the citation. If the appearance happened without my personal presence there, my theory is that I have no obligation to visit with the commissioner.
I haven't seen that before, it is probably new in California. Each case would be different in NY.
1: Open container in public.
2: Driving without a licence.
Especially since one is actual traffic legislation, and the other is more civil-local code.
Thanks Nerdmeister for the better explanation than I gave, I appreciate the help.
Today was my scheduled court date. I went to the clerk's office to get the papers stamped, and I was immediately treated with skepticism by the clerk. He initially said he couldn't receive the papers, and kept asking questions such as, "Where is 'John Doe'?" and "He's supposed to be in court now". When I asked if he was refusing to stamp/receive them he immediately stamped them, but told me they must be delivered to the prosecutor, and again refused to physically receive them.
The document was created using Word. The template is called "Pleading Paper" I downloaded it from microsoft's office website for free. After I received a stamp from the clerk on my copy of the receipt and observed the other copy (court copy) receive a stamp as well, I left.
Thank you for your post and especially the calm and personable presentation. Cheers Adan
Looked up the case informationt... and this case is STILL Open with NO PLEA entered. Awesome!
This is where I mess up. I went to the courtroom and asked the bailiff if I could present the papers to the prosecutor. He scanned over them and asked me similar questions, to see my ID (declined), if I was "one of those sovereign citizens" (BIG decline), etc. and became increasingly hostile. He essentially told me I could "go to court and deal with my business" or leave and he would have the judge issue a bench warrant, and would "personally drag me from my house".
I have no idea what happened when the commissioner called the defendant's name, as I never entered the courtroom (actually it isn't a courtroom, it is a department room).
All I did was take the document to the window and got it filed. It wasn't like they were happy to accommodate me, this is not to their advantage so there was some 'conversation' that took place prior to getting the document stamped.
In other words, don't expect smiling faces when you file this type of appearance.
Yes, this works for traffic cases. I filed my paperwork with the traffic court clerk, like you would do the same thing. The artist at the beginning of the video is Chris Geo from his album Global Resistance.
Cal Gov Code § 82048
(a) "Public official" means every member, officer, employee or consultant of a state or local government agency.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), "public official" does not include the following:
(1) A judge or court commissioner in the judicial branch of government.
(2) A member of the Board of Governors and designated employees of the State Bar of California.
(3) A member of the Judicial Council.
(4) A member of the Commission on Judicial Performance, provided that he or she is subject to the provisions of Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 6035) of Chapter 4 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code as provided in Section 6038 of that article.
(5) A federal officer or employee serving in an official federal capacity on a state or local government agency.
Cal Gov Code § 82049
"State agency" means every state office, department, division, bureau, board and commission, and the Legislature.
Ssn708, the UCC governs all commercial negotiations and the traffic summons is a contract to the proceedings of the court adminstrative process... the word "bench" means bank.
Yes, there were two different filings. On the 1st of Sep I filed a copy of the complaint filed against the arresting officers, a copy of the commissioners Oath and a copy of my non political ID. On the 8th, the appearance document was filed.
I will work on a video to create and use a non political ID and get that posted soon. Thanks for the comments, think freedom.
I walked up to the traffic court clerk window with two copies. One for the court, and one for my records. The clerk stamped both of them, kept the court copy and I retained my copy (the one you find in the video). As far as what happens after that, I don't care. If they say there wasn't an appearance, I would enter a copy of my stamped document to show the appearance requirement was met.
Fear is the ultimate tool. I was mentally prepared for a few days in the pokie if I made a mistake.
@altops It is vitally important to start with the premise that you have done something wrong if you don't get remedy. For example, whenever you receive any type of benefit from the government, you usually sign for that benefit. Your signature then is used on some sort of adhesion contract where you waive certain rights. I have dealt with every signature I can recall ever giving the government, either modifying it or rescinding it. My goal is to have no direct contracts with the government.
Although I was polite with the bailiff the entire time, he would not let me speak, and I got the sense if I didn't walk out or sit down he was going to arrest me right there. I walked back down to the clerk's office again, handed the paper to a different clerk, told them I was leaving them their copy (both were stamped), and walked out. I have an idea the entry never made it to court, either way, I was found guilty (just a slightly bigger fine). Sorry for triple posting.
If you were in front of the judge, and identified yourself as the person on the citation then the judge is correct. Very important you pay close attention to all the words used, why they are used and figure out exactly why this didn't work. You only have control over what you did wrong and what you need to learn.
@DAWATCHMEN **NOTICE** This is a posting on the internet. A defense in court of "I saw this on the internet" will not be effective. There is no legal advice on this posting, there is however a discussion of legal concepts, if you are unable to determine the difference you should seek competent legal counsel before applying any of the information on this posting. - There you go DAWATCHMEN, your own personal disclaimer just for you, I hope you feel special now.
In CA Commercial Code Section 9307(h) defines the physical location of the United States. Also CA Vehicle Code Section 21052 defines who is subject to the vehicle code. Finding statutes similar for the State of Michigan will go a long way in helping you find the remedy
Now in Michigan, you don't sign traffic ticket from the cop. you have signature when U pay.
I took mine in personally, however if I find myself in a similar situation again, I will mail it in certified mail, return receipt with a third party affidavit of mailing giving enough time to get a conformed copy from the court before the appearance date.
Hey I am in Texas also! Tell your son to appear and DEMAND a verified criminal complaint. He cannot be prosecuted without one unless he has already entered a plea. When you enter a plea you agree to be prosecuted.
Even more infuriating is that there is a crown corporation, in Canada which insures every Home loan to a Mortgagees. Every mom and pop Mortgagor (the one who actually owns the House) gives a Mortgage to a financial institution, they pay an extra 5%, to cover the one time insurance payment to CHMC, Canadian Housing Mortgage Corporation. If the Mortgagor defaults on payment, the Bank or private lender gets payed in full including all interests they expected to earn(300% interest), in one lump sum.
Skilo, I had the same problem as you were getting. Took a while, but I DID find the case and it is filed with the Orange County courts. What you need to do is go to the home page of OC Courts. Then, click on the link for Online Case Access with the red folder design near the bottom of the page. Then Criminal and Traffic Case Access, Accept Terms, and then use that search box to find it. Comes right up.
Corey, it's confusing because the page has multiple search engines and not all find the case
Well done, your research and comment is appreciated. My goal is to learn from this exercise and your efforts are appreciated. The names in the context of the court record are a product of their errors, and not intentional on my part. I established the validity of my identity (self created non political common law ID) which claimed and was acted upon to aquire domicile long before this contact. My focus on this case is the original State of California (1849) exists and is recognized.
hey dude thanks a lot for taking the time to do this. I have a question, I went to your website and checked out the documents and the actual citation where you sign your signature, there was just a little bit that I couldn't make out, I believe we have "without prejudice UCC 1-308 By: Corey Eib rush signature"
I might be mistaken on something in there, mainly the last part, Rush signature? ehhh
PS I dont live far from Laguna Beach if you give consultations (:
Hi Ian, the word is not Rush, it is 'Auth' short for Authorized Signature. The same term used as the signature line on your personal checks - get a magnifying glass, or scan a check at high resolution and magnify the line you will see the same term. Here is the relevant CA code on a signature by an agent that is 'authorized' to sign on behalf of a principle: | www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=com&group=03001-04000&file=3401-3420
Send a private message regarding meetings, there are several public events I attend in the OC area.
Waving a hand from Southern California - Thanks for stopping by.
Great observation Dane. The special appearance description is slightly off however. A special appearance, from my understanding, is related to determine jurisdiction only. So after further study, the term "appearing specially" on the plea document is actually null, because the defendant entered a plea of 'defendant does not plead.' From what I have learned since, there was no need for the special appearance wording and it would have been more proper to just write 'defendant appears' instead.
The only person I care that agrees with me is a judge. So far I find no evidence that a judge disagrees with me. If you think what you have found would cause a judge to disagree with elements presented here, i suggest you not consider the use of the strategy presented.
@seaneire The only government issued ID I ever use is a passport, this reasoning is based on the legal difference between a passport (federal ID) and State ID. The federal ID does not give an address, and uses the title 'given name' and 'surname' where a state ID uses the title 'first' and 'last' name. Your first name, is the name on the birth certificate, and the birth (berth) cert is government property, as I said in the video I will never identify myself voluntarily as government property.
Love the song you have at the beginning. I have that CD downloaded from Chris Geo's website. DO you have experience in fighting red light tickets?
You don't need a template. When you understand from research what the document is, it will be clear what you will need on it to make it valid. I know this might be a frustrating answer, however I promise if you figure it out you will be grateful the answer wasn't provided. It is the research that gives you the depth of knowledge needed to play this game of traveling free
I don't think there is such a law regarding signature being rescinded in 3 days, but I am certain that the signature on the citation is not the problem, it is the signature on your driver license application that may be a better target of your research.
Great work! Glad to hear of your success. Congratulations on disposing of your citation via appearance.
I don't know about New York, but here in Cali I just walked up to the window and filed the documents. I said I didn't have to see the judge because it wasn't me that was summonsed on the citation (the reason for my qualified signature on the citation).
Answer: When those who enter into contracts with the government and don't want to honor those contracts or recognize that our founding fathers earned the unlimited right to contract. The unlimited right to contract is a serious weapon, but if you have the dangerous end pointed the wrong way, things don't work out so good.
A desire for liberty is the foundation of my studies, if you want to be left alone, as I do, then clear up your contracts and properly protect your inalienable rights.
Clue:
Check Blacks Law Dictionary for the Legalese meaning of "certificate" also "License", as in "Marriage License" (the adhesion contract with the government, your parents signed, probably 9 months before you were born).
Yes there is a lot you can do. I fought a lot of tickets before finally rescinding my drivers license, and one of the best resources I found was a book from Nolo Press called "Fight Your Ticket and Win." Lots of great info, and the best $20 I have ever spent on a book. Find a copy that is specific to your state. RE the rude FHP officer, you can get a copy of the audio they recorded during the stop, if there is enough to it after you hear the audio, you can file a complaint.
Thanks Pete!! i appreciate you taking the time to do that. Peeeeaaace!
Corey - good job! Small (or big) steps like this help put a stop to the corruption and oppressiveness of the courts and the nonsense behind infractions. What is the current status of your efforts? Thanks!
@altops Article 1 Section 10 of the constitution, the State may not impair the obligation of contracts. I have rescinded or modified all known contracts with the government. Most people who have problems are 1. incompetent before law 2. don't realize their contractual obligations. My suggestion is to first look at what you have signed before placing blame on police for them doing their job. My experience with the sheriff, local police and customs has been very positive.
@dcg1901, Thanks for taking the time to post those codes. 12500 has no geographical limitation on it. In theory that code section would apply to the entire world, which we know it doesn't. CVC Section 21052 enumerates to whom the code applies (and it's application isn't in a geographical sense, the code only applies in a political sense). I am neither an employee of the state, nor am I a political subdivision of the state as I do not identify myself as the person on the birth certificate.
Yes thank you for putting this together. I sure are spreading the word and ppl I know will be too. Please keep the videos coming. Please !!
In the days when common law prevailed, freemen would identify their age based on date of conception. If anyone went to check the family bible, it would be easy to see if the parents were married prior to conception. This was a very important part of someone's life in the early days.
he was fined $2300 for whatever tickets he got and for not showing up. he didn't get away with anything, and there's no piece of paper that's going to allow you to not show up for court.
The reason the court could not enter a plea in this case is the defendant was presented competently, met the appearance requirement and did not enter a plea. This did not give the commissioner jurisdiction to enter a plea. What Country is your domicile?
My apologies Corey I do agree with you sir united we stand and the beast is the real enemy not each other thanks for your professionalism!
I rescinded my signature with the DMV in writing, sent via USPS certified mail return receipt. You can get an idea of the format of the letter I wrote by reading the pdf "Errant Sovereigns Handbook." I would suggest however that before you take this course of action you determine if there is any other application that may bind you to the jurisdiction of the state.
Exactly. If I provided start and end points using this strategy (very dangerous if you don't know what you are doing), someone would no doubt try to duplicate my efforts without knowing what to do if the judge changed the game (and believe me they will change the game). You have to think on your feet to do this. You have to know how to stay in the battle, and stay out of jail. That only comes from serious study and confidence that your knowledge base will protect you, not some video on TH-cam.
The only criticism I have with this, is that the appearance is not mandatory. If your appearance is mandatory, then the court may issue a bench warrant.
However, if it was mandatory; John Doe did appear through paperwork. How could the court prove that he didnt appear?
Yes, however it is reasonable to say that conception happened circa 9 months prior to birth. My common law identification has the date of conception listed as month and year only, picking an exact date would likely not be accurate so it is not on the ID
THANK YOU FOR YOUR GOOD WORK.
Do you have a check list of ebook available?
Warm Regards
Pete
Corey, Why do they still have an active case open since Jan 23, 2014 when this incident was back in 2011? It still says arraignment but the items are for infractions a total of (23) hearing since the first. I thought after one year, you can move to dismiss them. Is this right? Also do you have a website with you filings on it the OCCourts does not display the images of the filings you submitted to the court. Can you direct me to the site?
Rich A - according to my interpretation of law, yes I thought at the time of filming this I could move to dismiss after one year. The Superior court has responded, by changing the game midstream. The filings I submitted were summarily dismissed by the superior court, taking this to another level. I discuss these issues regularly on a podcast I cohost with Todd McGreevy. Check out show archives at Agenda31.org #huntingcommunists
Thanks for this video corey. I have two questions, 1) How do I make a new I.D. like the one you show? do you have a sample form i could imitate? 2) How did you rescinded your signature on the form DL-44? although I live in New York i am sure there is not that much of a difference.
I am NOT asking these questions as legal advice, it is just for entertainment purposes.
The supreme court ruled that at the moment Cornwallis left the battlefield during the revolutionary war, all the men of the land became sovereign, however without subjects. In my video I am not referring to those 'sovereigns' - rather I am referring to the dangerous radical sovereigns such as "Jerry Kane."
I have met many Sheriffs and Police chiefs in the past year, and I am thankful for what they do, they protect us from "sovereigns" such as Jerry Kane.
And the truth is found via education, discernment and standing up for yourself.
I have read the same thing. I determined that to be a rabbit hole (personal opinion) because the case is brought in the name of the People, and the commissioner works for the State. Doesn't mean you aren't correct, I just didn't pursue that course of action. Have you tried that approach?
thanks for the props arviagant13. The word appear as used in court does not mean physically show up, it means to submit to (at least that is the level of my knowledge currently). However the issue of competence is at play, and that is why the citation in this video was signed the way it was.
Take care not to drive faster than your headlights with this legal stuff, before using this strategy, read a book by Nolo Press = Fight Your Ticket and Win. There you will find strategies to extend.
I took it to the clerk's window. However I would caution you at this point - just getting the paperwork in is only part of the game... make sure you don't exceed your knowledge base and create more trouble than necessary, or be prepared to learn from your mistakes.
If I found myself unable to file in person, I would mail it as described above.
Just a question, there have been some resent case Hearings on this case, 2013 Hearings:
07/31/2013 08:30 AM Arraignment - H8 Heard
08/01/2013 02:30 PM Arraignment - H7 Heard
08/08/2013 08:30 AM Arraignment - H7 Heard
have you been appearing still?
case still open as of Jan 1 2014 :-)
This case is open and verifiable in court. Perhaps you should contact the court and inquire as to why they have not issued a warrant for failure to appear. The code violations are clear in this case, if there is a failure to appear, a warrant shall be issued according to the code. No warrant, because the law was followed and the appearance requirement was met. Dont' know how to make this more transparent, just contact the court and verify.