I love your tests man, You're the first one to compare the SD and Exynos in real time. Can you make a battery drain test between both versions as well? also if you can run the antutu back to back on both and compare heat and score drop of both that would be superb
Please do the same test as last year, comparing exynos vs SD galaxies battery life in normal daily tasks. Except gaming, exynos 2100 proved to be quite efficient in normal day to day tasks. Based on your tests last year I made the decision to go for local exynos S21 and I don't regret it.
Also to add to this, he can do one "Max Stress" Test. Compare the performance of running the highest graphical console, which has a well-optimised emulator, running the highest graphical game, which is well-optimised for the console, one that has a 60fps limit, can push its resolution, and choose a taxing part of the game and play for an extended period (over 30mins/throttling). After some researching, this is what I've found: Dolphin Emulator, Nintendo Wii, Mario Galaxy 2 (60fps), bump it to x4 resolution, and play on one of the larger levels. That way, if your Samsung S22 Ultra with the new QC 8g1 is only getting a median of 24fps, out of a total 60fps, then you know you are running at 40% total. And you can compare this to other devices, for instance, S21 Ultra (QSD 888) with 20fps/33%, Note20 Ultra (QSD 865) with 18fps/30%, Note 10+ (QSD 855) with 15fps/25%. Alternate: play any of these even more demanding games, but not as well optimised for the Wii, and they're all running at 30fps. The titles ranging from: Monster Hunter Tri, Xenoblade Chronicles, Zelda Skyward Sword, Metroid Corruption, and Star Wars Force Unleashed 2.
As a reminder, OPPO's picture quality is really not good, Samsung is relatively poor, because he uses Sony's old sensor, in order to save costs, but he has made some improvements in other aspects, such as Mariana chip, Chinese mobile phone photography quality vivox70pro➕ is the best, its sensor is Samsung gn1 sensor, in terms of picture quality has been better than most Sony mobile phone sensors, Google mobile phone sensor is also Samsung gn1, Sony's one-inch sensor mobile phone is castrated version, The pixel area is much lower than Samsung's sensor.
Mobile phones' performance has been rising exponentially every year, it was about time we hit a bottlebeck. Might not be bad, the developers can finally catch-up on what mobile phones are capable of and develop some good games instead of just MOBAS, sandbox or shitty Mmorpgs that look like they're from 2006 💀
I have an S20 5G Snapdragon 865 and pre ordered an S22 Ultra. Kinda disappointing to see how it currently performs, but maybe updates will help with stabilization, better battery life and better thermal management. But only time will tell. Either way, I'm excited to get my S22 Ultra.
Good, S20FE was a major downfall of samsung due to lots of problem with 5G network reception. During college many of our colleagues exchanged their FE with S21 only for 5G.
That wildlife stability for the exy 2200 is much higher than the Snap 8 Gen 1. Cool to see. Thanks for the video btw, can't wait for the first Samsung performance update that should be here any minute (next week).
@Unknown Meanwhile the Snap 870 scores 1210 highest and 1201 lowest in stress test extreme. Having after 20 Minutes reached the performance of the Snap 8 gen 1 XD At lower power usage of course, this is stability.
Great test man! But, is it possible that you could also test the S22 Ultra, both the SD and Exynos variant, compared to the iPhone 13 Pro Max and OnePlus 10 Pro in this same comparison?
I don't know why but I'm rooting for exynos platform and I think with next updates it will be more stable and I think negative reviews finally put enough pressure to Samsung to up their game
Please don't start an argument, as from the tests he did the Exynos was right up against the gen 1, and worse but not by a large amount. The highest end phones never lag in android games so it doesn't matter. if you want to start an argument, please resist the urge. I merely posted my opinion on the video and performance during the testing, and I was not asking for people to start an argument under my replies, please resist the urge to get mad at someone for an opinion they hold, and respectfully ignore it. Also if you are looking for a gaming phone, you should not get a note 22 ultra. Thank you
@@venator7889 th-cam.com/video/tVwbyqNsUSk/w-d-xo.html This shows that throughout the video they both stay within 5 fps of each other. You should research before you choose to just make a hate opinion. Its like you only wanted to make me reconsider this, only I am smarter then that and do my research, and its clear that they are about equal in fps, and slightly leaning to the gen 1 when in extreme scenarios. please consider being educated before making decisions. As they say, the more you know, the less you know that you don't know. The less you know, the more you think there is to learn. the more you know the more you know there is to learn. This is taken into effect in this scenario, when you make the opinion that the gen 1 is miles better then the exynos, but in reality its about on par with the gen 1. You should really consider educating yourself before you jump to conclusions. In the video I linked above it shows throughout that whole video there is minimal difference in the extreme scenarios, that most people don't even experience normally.
@@venator7889 Even at the end of the video the snapdragon chip, is the one that has higher temperature, as well as slightly better performance. I find it hard to believe that you would be using a note 22 ultra, and using it in genshin impact, and finding that the exynos was "nowhere close to the performance of the snapdragon. Please continue to not lead uneducated guesses. If you even watched the whole video above, you could have understood that the benchmarks SIMULATE GAMES, with general task benchmarks and gpu and cpu benchmarks. This would simulate extreme game scenarios to the point where it is accurate enough emulate an extreme game experience. Nevertheless it is enough power to have seamless gaming performance where it is indistinguishable from perfect. Can you just be grateful that there are powerful phones that can run games of this demanding recourses. The fact that phones can run games faster then a lot of PC's can't now, should be incredible, but it seems your extreme mindset just wants better and better performance, even if it makes it indistinguishable form perfect performance. Even in the video its clear that if the phone can reach impeccable scores that are right on par with the snapdragon, which runs games infinitely seamlessly there should be no reason to be dismissing the exynos, which can run everything just fine, and even so, the exynos, makes the phones cheaper! When Samsung makes the chip they save money and don't need to sell the phones for higher price, which is a plus, can we not just be grateful that phones can be cheaper, and are able to create a machine that can do everything that we want and more, can we just take a second to step back and admire the accomplishments that are in place, that the phones we so easily get mad at for making a minor mistake, are something we cannot live without for a day? This feels like direct anger just at Samsung for making a phone with an inferior chip, but in reality there is nothing wrong with the phone, so why are we being mad? there is no reason for the anger, there is no reason for you to be mad, they are just using their recourses to make a cheaper phone, which helps us all, they make a phone which can do everything, even with great build quality, but no, its because in the past Samsung has created a chip that was worse, for only 2 models! why fry from the truth? why be like this when it is a great phone and in reality there is nothing wrong with it, and it is on par with the snapdragon version. Thank you.
Excellent work bro! Hopefully both S22 Ultra variants will improve n perform better with couple of updates. It will b interesting to see how they perform after few months. U gt a new sub today. Thnx.
Glad Samsung finally got their Exynos right. Was always a bit disappointed that the European version lacked the snapdragon but now it's almost the same, also battery life seems fine compared to my old Note 10+ exynos that kills the battery even on battery savings mode within 24h
@@crazymalak100 since the s21 exynos 2100 it's been better than the snapdragon 888 and till now that still is the case due to some updates and optimizations for the exynos. Don't pay attention to videos about the exynos being worst than the exynos when the phones are literally just released. It's annoying but just wait for the updates to come and the exynos will somewhat perform similar or higher than the snapdragon
Try to do a battery test without the S pan attached. It seems like AMD assisted Samsung in providing better sustained performance. I hope the GPU gets better with time like their PC graphics cards.
@@damara2268 comparative in same conditions (mid bright and 60 hz) and also obviously dark mode on. A friend have both s22 and mini and told me that, snapdragon versión
Both the SD 8 gen 1 and E2200 seem to be fairly disappointing. Especially since they are more power hungry, for just a little bit of extra performance compared to their predecessors...
It's because they're on the same manufacturing process. Samsung 4nm is actually just renamed 5nm with some slight changes that don't really change it's effectivity So technically both these generations are on the same manufacturing quality
@@damara2268 No, they're both on the new 4nm process. They were both reported to have similarly low yield, but Snapdragon yielded slightly higher at 35% because Qualcomm sent their engineers to Samsung facilities to make sure they got the yields up. Samsung 5nm yields were at 50% for last gen chips like SD888 and Exynos 2100 in 1H 2021. The problem is that 4nm missed yield targets at the intended performance completely, so they lowered performance targets to achieve an acceptable levels of yield. It was reported that Exynos 2200's GPU frequency target was adjusted down from 1.8Ghz to 1.3Ghz at same power, for example. So 4nm is new, but it's really bad right now. It might have been better to stay on 5nm
@@paranoidpanzerpenguin5262 that's not how it works, that nm its just a name, tsmc's 7nm has more transistors than samsung's 4nm node which would imply that tsmc's is actually smaller but its called 7nm...
Amazing video, i have been waiting for this thanks for taking the effort and time to make this comparison... Can you please do the S22 Ultra vs S22 Plus benchmark with both on FullHD+ and WQHD+ resolution as this will show what how they perform... many reviewers they do benchmarck with WQHD+ resolution only and they compare it with FullHD+ from the S22 plus so am sure there will be a difference. Thank you
About the bonus battery drain test towards the end of the video, you should have mentioned if the two S21 Ultras are bought brand new when you made this test, or do they have the disadvantage of being a year older than the S22 Ultras. Could have made this test a bit more accurate.
Man smartphone benchmarking is so different compared to PC benchmarking, where you can predict the performance based on the detailed factors available publicly. With Smartphone SoCs there is a lack of information available publicly on power draw(PL1/PL2 etc), that it's difficult to find the 'baseline'. Anyways good test, India gets the 8gen1, so all good! 😌
The price of having a powerful chipset is the battery performance. Well i have also watch some youtuve videos where s21 ultra battery test beats s22 ultra and this video also the same.. Thats why i am happy with my s21 ultra
At least the exynos 2200 is actually not too much behind the Snapdragon 8 gen 1 which is pretty good which means that the exynos 2200 isn't as disappointing as it first seemed. Although the battery life between the 2 are gonna intresting to see.
@@Dylan-pp5fg or maybe the exynos just isn't as bad as it's portrayed to be... Either way the performance isn't what I'm interested in it's the battery life. If it's worse then last year's then that's gonna be pretty horrible.
@@Dylan-pp5fg if you think they're throttling to match the performance of exynos 2200 then you don't know how hot this shit gets on phones which are not optimised to handle the heat on phones with full clocked performance
@@Dylan-pp5fg go watch a test of sd gen 1on other phones and see how it becomes a literal sun and if u see some trailers about Samsung then tell if they are throttling the performance or underclocking it with a new cooling system so it doesn't become a heater.
Off the video path I didn't think you were an Asian person but that's cool I love Asians very much and trust them 🥰 Great and fair video. We appreciate your work and interest, but I think that all devices in the video are very powerful and can do anything, and this is great. I think that the main causes of some problems are software and game developers, not processors.
@@relax.b13 He is from China, but stay in Singapore. His accent definitely not like singaporean. He also posted his video in chinese language on Bilibili site where the way he speak chinese much formal than regular singaporean.
Would you consider running all the gfxbench tests one at a time allowing cool down between them for all devices to see effects of thermal throttling on later tests?
I think situation can be improved with rumours new snapdragon gen 1 plus coming on tsmc node it help snapdragon with efficiency thus further improving performance hope it launch soon
Should of done the benchmarks after running a CPU and GPU intensive benchmark and then see how they perform after 20 mins of use. I bet they would all be similar.
Just as I thought, the SD Gen 1 seems to provide the superior performance if you are into gaming/GPU intensive tasks, but it can also be hotter and more power-hungry than the Exynos.
@@Randomdude21-e nah bro it was the leaked number by amd that created the hype, no one had faith in exynos. But the exynos 2200 do have much better frame stability than the 8gen 1 in longer gaming session , so I don’t think it is “years behind”, especially when snapdragon seems to be stuck as well, they aren't really doing anything other than increasing the watts
Very interesting comparison, Please add also the Work 3.0 battery life test results, it can provide a reliable system to estimate also the battery life of these devices
Genshin isn't optimised good for 120 fps, the iPhone can run it at 120 fps and has the horsepower to run it at stable 120 fps but it's get hot so that's why he should test it with the razer chroma cooler.
I did the same Wild Life Extreme Stress Test on my S22 Ultra SD8G1, my stats: Best Loop Score: 2568 Lowest Loop Score: 1525 Stability: 59.4% Battery: 69% to 56% Temperature: 27C to 41C Frame rate: 7FPS to 19FPS Seems like either something improved or I hit silicon lottery :)
@@GoldenReviewer Could be, though it's totally normal winter climate here, I just put the phone next to my nightstand and let it do its thing lol However, that lowest score difference seems quite huge, I can't really say why it is this way, but who knows
So basically all the media is spreading some enthusiast 5s benchmark propaganda about exynos? Nice. Thank you for your test! For a 1st try by AMD this is a good result. :-)
I ran the geekbench 5 test on my s22 ultra snapdragon variant. Results were very unstable. I did it 3 times. 1st: 416 & 1416 2nd: 973 & 3271 3rd: 1068 & 2332 Can you please explain why these numbers are so different and low?
⚠️There are terrible issue with benchmark in Korea.⚠️ because samsung uses 'Game Optimizing Service' to limit⛔️ actual working only except for benchmark apps.
Thank you for the test...i want to buy an s21 ultra with exynos 2100.....i m pubg pro player....i played with phone snpdrgn 865....no problem...some times it bugs....and heat....i want to change the phone...to s21 ultra..but in my contry there is only s21 ultra with exynos....any advice ? Should i buy it ? Any lag..heat ..for pubg...? I play over 4h in day
Hi, I'm curious kindly add snapdragon and exynos note 20 ultra. I'm planning to upgrade from my Snapdragon N10+5G but I'm focused more on sustained gaming performance, I want to see how stable it is compared to s22 series
I thought this year samsung will finally beat snapdragon but it didn't happen. Samsung Exynos chip is trying to beat the snapdragon chip but the snapdragon chip is always making sure to stay on top. The competition is getting tight.
Have to admit.. I subbed mainly for the golden retriever profile. But great objective reviews too! Really useful to provide benchmarks with context and thermals. Keep up the good work!
@@propersod2390 It's fast enough? Who are you to judge that? Even if it is. Is basically zero CPU improvements in 1 year of development acceptable? They didnt even improve efficiency, from some tests it looks like it's even worse. People are hoping Android will make ground on Apple performance and efficiency lead, but instead Apple seems to be pulling away improving performance and efficiency every year while Android is just stuck with minimal improvements but yet charge the same prices.
Can someone enlighten me. S22 ultra be it SD8gen or exypnos. These processor havent yet been optimised yet right? Thats explain why the battery drain kinda bad.
SD865 It is enough for anyone and the consumption is much lower. For me, the 865 is still the best. I hope my terminal will last a long time. I don't want to lose the 3.5 jack or microSD. lg v60
Best comparison video 👍 as we see Samsung exynos 2200 really bad situation with reality.İ think Samsung should change CPU /Exynos departments who has decided this CPU,
I love your tests man, You're the first one to compare the SD and Exynos in real time.
Can you make a battery drain test between both versions as well? also if you can run the antutu back to back on both and compare heat and score drop of both that would be superb
See the stress test 7:00
Please do the same test as last year, comparing exynos vs SD galaxies battery life in normal daily tasks. Except gaming, exynos 2100 proved to be quite efficient in normal day to day tasks. Based on your tests last year I made the decision to go for local exynos S21 and I don't regret it.
I'll be waiting fot it too
which video? could you please send the link? there are various tests
@@ensarguler7684 I think it's this one th-cam.com/video/eSL7PXYPk40/w-d-xo.html
Also to add to this, he can do one "Max Stress" Test.
Compare the performance of running the highest graphical console, which has a well-optimised emulator, running the highest graphical game, which is well-optimised for the console, one that has a 60fps limit, can push its resolution, and choose a taxing part of the game and play for an extended period (over 30mins/throttling).
After some researching, this is what I've found:
Dolphin Emulator, Nintendo Wii, Mario Galaxy 2 (60fps), bump it to x4 resolution, and play on one of the larger levels.
That way, if your Samsung S22 Ultra with the new QC 8g1 is only getting a median of 24fps, out of a total 60fps, then you know you are running at 40% total. And you can compare this to other devices, for instance, S21 Ultra (QSD 888) with 20fps/33%, Note20 Ultra (QSD 865) with 18fps/30%, Note 10+ (QSD 855) with 15fps/25%.
Alternate: play any of these even more demanding games, but not as well optimised for the Wii, and they're all running at 30fps. The titles ranging from: Monster Hunter Tri, Xenoblade Chronicles, Zelda Skyward Sword, Metroid Corruption, and Star Wars Force Unleashed 2.
As a reminder, OPPO's picture quality is really not good, Samsung is relatively poor, because he uses Sony's old sensor, in order to save costs, but he has made some improvements in other aspects, such as Mariana chip, Chinese mobile phone photography quality vivox70pro➕ is the best, its sensor is Samsung gn1 sensor, in terms of picture quality has been better than most Sony mobile phone sensors, Google mobile phone sensor is also Samsung gn1, Sony's one-inch sensor mobile phone is castrated version, The pixel area is much lower than Samsung's sensor.
You are the only youtuber that does tests that actually are useful for us Exynos people. Thank you.
Really great testing! Hope to see a battery test between the s22u exynos and sd.
Yeah, No one did it so far. Please do it soon since so many are waiting to see it first 👍
@@Muthuragavan he did it already :D
@@RealLagu Cool.. Just noticed 😊
It's a rough year for SOC's when the Snapdragon 888 has the best thermals lol
And it's funny because the s22 has that heatpipe and graphene, while the s21 just has graphene.
Mobile phones' performance has been rising exponentially every year, it was about time we hit a bottlebeck.
Might not be bad, the developers can finally catch-up on what mobile phones are capable of and develop some good games instead of just MOBAS, sandbox or shitty Mmorpgs that look like they're from 2006 💀
@@steadfastgamer apple is still making good gains every year. QUALCOMM has failed with the 888 and 8 Gen 1.
@@ippothedestroyer1 despite its overheating issues, SD 888 was still a big performance boost compared to 865.
8Gen1, not so much.
@@steadfastgamer I thought the 8Gen1 improved in neural network computing?
Best benchmarking on TH-cam. The only one who let's the devices cool down!
I have an S20 5G Snapdragon 865 and pre ordered an S22 Ultra. Kinda disappointing to see how it currently performs, but maybe updates will help with stabilization, better battery life and better thermal management. But only time will tell. Either way, I'm excited to get my S22 Ultra.
Good, S20FE was a major downfall of samsung due to lots of problem with 5G network reception. During college many of our colleagues exchanged their FE with S21 only for 5G.
Haha lucky you. I be holding on my s20 ultra 865 a little longer. Hehe.
How is your phone currently?
That wildlife stability for the exy 2200 is much higher than the Snap 8 Gen 1. Cool to see. Thanks for the video btw, can't wait for the first Samsung performance update that should be here any minute (next week).
@Unknown Meanwhile the Snap 870 scores 1210 highest and 1201 lowest in stress test extreme. Having after 20 Minutes reached the performance of the Snap 8 gen 1 XD
At lower power usage of course, this is stability.
@@fa14bi-78 haha long live TSMC made snapdragon...888 suck due with samsung kernel
How is your phone currently?
Please do the battery test for s22 ultra exynos vs snapdragon
Yes please 👏🏻👏🏻
After the firmware update
Current its having pre release software
Thanks a lot for the test. Amazing. Seeing these tests, I am satisfied with Exynos preorder.
Great test man! But, is it possible that you could also test the S22 Ultra, both the SD and Exynos variant, compared to the iPhone 13 Pro Max and OnePlus 10 Pro in this same comparison?
I don't know why but I'm rooting for exynos platform and I think with next updates it will be more stable and I think negative reviews finally put enough pressure to Samsung to up their game
I am really surprised on how well the exynos did! This really improved my expectations thank you for the informative video!
These are just benchmarks.
The Exynos comes nowhere close to the Snapdragon 8Gen1 in heavy gaming performance
@@venator7889 stfu bro. nOwHeRe cLoSe lol.
Please don't start an argument, as from the tests he did the Exynos was right up against the gen 1, and worse but not by a large amount. The highest end phones never lag in android games so it doesn't matter. if you want to start an argument, please resist the urge. I merely posted my opinion on the video and performance during the testing, and I was not asking for people to start an argument under my replies, please resist the urge to get mad at someone for an opinion they hold, and respectfully ignore it. Also if you are looking for a gaming phone, you should not get a note 22 ultra. Thank you
@@venator7889 th-cam.com/video/tVwbyqNsUSk/w-d-xo.html This shows that throughout the video they both stay within 5 fps of each other. You should research before you choose to just make a hate opinion. Its like you only wanted to make me reconsider this, only I am smarter then that and do my research, and its clear that they are about equal in fps, and slightly leaning to the gen 1 when in extreme scenarios. please consider being educated before making decisions. As they say, the more you know, the less you know that you don't know. The less you know, the more you think there is to learn. the more you know the more you know there is to learn. This is taken into effect in this scenario, when you make the opinion that the gen 1 is miles better then the exynos, but in reality its about on par with the gen 1. You should really consider educating yourself before you jump to conclusions. In the video I linked above it shows throughout that whole video there is minimal difference in the extreme scenarios, that most people don't even experience normally.
@@venator7889 Even at the end of the video the snapdragon chip, is the one that has higher temperature, as well as slightly better performance. I find it hard to believe that you would be using a note 22 ultra, and using it in genshin impact, and finding that the exynos was "nowhere close to the performance of the snapdragon. Please continue to not lead uneducated guesses. If you even watched the whole video above, you could have understood that the benchmarks SIMULATE GAMES, with general task benchmarks and gpu and cpu benchmarks. This would simulate extreme game scenarios to the point where it is accurate enough emulate an extreme game experience. Nevertheless it is enough power to have seamless gaming performance where it is indistinguishable from perfect. Can you just be grateful that there are powerful phones that can run games of this demanding recourses. The fact that phones can run games faster then a lot of PC's can't now, should be incredible, but it seems your extreme mindset just wants better and better performance, even if it makes it indistinguishable form perfect performance. Even in the video its clear that if the phone can reach impeccable scores that are right on par with the snapdragon, which runs games infinitely seamlessly there should be no reason to be dismissing the exynos, which can run everything just fine, and even so, the exynos, makes the phones cheaper! When Samsung makes the chip they save money and don't need to sell the phones for higher price, which is a plus, can we not just be grateful that phones can be cheaper, and are able to create a machine that can do everything that we want and more, can we just take a second to step back and admire the accomplishments that are in place, that the phones we so easily get mad at for making a minor mistake, are something we cannot live without for a day? This feels like direct anger just at Samsung for making a phone with an inferior chip, but in reality there is nothing wrong with the phone, so why are we being mad? there is no reason for the anger, there is no reason for you to be mad, they are just using their recourses to make a cheaper phone, which helps us all, they make a phone which can do everything, even with great build quality, but no, its because in the past Samsung has created a chip that was worse, for only 2 models! why fry from the truth? why be like this when it is a great phone and in reality there is nothing wrong with it, and it is on par with the snapdragon version. Thank you.
Amazing reviews as always! keep the great work 💯
Much appreciated!
Well put up, very informative and practically oriented! Good stuff.
Excellent work bro! Hopefully both S22 Ultra variants will improve n perform better with couple of updates. It will b interesting to see how they perform after few months. U gt a new sub today. Thnx.
Glad Samsung finally got their Exynos right. Was always a bit disappointed that the European version lacked the snapdragon but now it's almost the same, also battery life seems fine compared to my old Note 10+ exynos that kills the battery even on battery savings mode within 24h
How did they fix it?
@@crazymalak100 since the s21 exynos 2100 it's been better than the snapdragon 888 and till now that still is the case due to some updates and optimizations for the exynos. Don't pay attention to videos about the exynos being worst than the exynos when the phones are literally just released. It's annoying but just wait for the updates to come and the exynos will somewhat perform similar or higher than the snapdragon
Try to do a battery test without the S pan attached.
It seems like AMD assisted Samsung in providing better sustained performance. I hope the GPU gets better with time like their PC graphics cards.
Could you test the s22 battery drain test ? I wanna see how long the 3700mah battery lasts
Like an iphone 13 mini
@@albertcaytuiro3770 nope, S22 ultra only last the same as iphone SE so no way this with lower battery will last longer than iphone 13 mini
@@damara2268 any source?
@@damara2268 comparative in same conditions (mid bright and 60 hz) and also obviously dark mode on. A friend have both s22 and mini and told me that, snapdragon versión
@@damara2268 big cap
Both the SD 8 gen 1 and E2200 seem to be fairly disappointing. Especially since they are more power hungry, for just a little bit of extra performance compared to their predecessors...
It's because they're on the same manufacturing process. Samsung 4nm is actually just renamed 5nm with some slight changes that don't really change it's effectivity
So technically both these generations are on the same manufacturing quality
@@damara2268 no the 8gen1 is on the renamed node not the E2200
@@damara2268 Samsung 4nn is even worse than Intel 10nm and is a lot....
@@damara2268 No, they're both on the new 4nm process. They were both reported to have similarly low yield, but Snapdragon yielded slightly higher at 35% because Qualcomm sent their engineers to Samsung facilities to make sure they got the yields up. Samsung 5nm yields were at 50% for last gen chips like SD888 and Exynos 2100 in 1H 2021. The problem is that 4nm missed yield targets at the intended performance completely, so they lowered performance targets to achieve an acceptable levels of yield. It was reported that Exynos 2200's GPU frequency target was adjusted down from 1.8Ghz to 1.3Ghz at same power, for example.
So 4nm is new, but it's really bad right now. It might have been better to stay on 5nm
@@paranoidpanzerpenguin5262 that's not how it works, that nm its just a name, tsmc's 7nm has more transistors than samsung's 4nm node which would imply that tsmc's is actually smaller but its called 7nm...
Bro we are waiting Dimensity 9000
(Oppo with Dmn 9000 ✅)
Same
Amazing video, i have been waiting for this thanks for taking the effort and time to make this comparison... Can you please do the S22 Ultra vs S22 Plus benchmark with both on FullHD+ and WQHD+ resolution as this will show what how they perform... many reviewers they do benchmarck with WQHD+ resolution only and they compare it with FullHD+ from the S22 plus so am sure there will be a difference. Thank you
You are the probably the best phone tester on youtube. Very detailed and testing all the phones in all the ways we want.
Geekerwan does a better job imo, but most of his videos are in chinese.
About the bonus battery drain test towards the end of the video, you should have mentioned if the two S21 Ultras are bought brand new when you made this test, or do they have the disadvantage of being a year older than the S22 Ultras. Could have made this test a bit more accurate.
Great comparison across both variants for current and last gen devices. Really appreciate the effort on this.
That is far the best comparison test of those chips. Thank you!
This is the most important test on the internet right now. Very good work!
Man smartphone benchmarking is so different compared to PC benchmarking, where you can predict the performance based on the detailed factors available publicly. With Smartphone SoCs there is a lack of information available publicly on power draw(PL1/PL2 etc), that it's difficult to find the 'baseline'.
Anyways good test, India gets the 8gen1, so all good! 😌
Awesome tests man just what I was looking for! Thank you very much :)
Was waiting for this comparison anxiously.. Thanks.. 👍
Hope you like it!
This just shows how 3D marks results are heavily impacted by driver update. The test should be done after 3rd of march.
Whats happening on the 3rd?
Its about time you started including the burnout benchmark.
Thanks for letting us know about the room temp. Very important!
The only thing which this amazing channel needs is social apps comparisons especially between iphone 13 pm and S22u in low light videos
Great and interesting tests in controlled conditions! Performance is quite comparable... Still the SD devices seem sometimes more optimized.
Best video of ultra series. Cleared all the doubts. Thank you 👍👍👍👍🙂🙂🙂🙂
The price of having a powerful chipset is the battery performance. Well i have also watch some youtuve videos where s21 ultra battery test beats s22 ultra and this video also the same.. Thats why i am happy with my s21 ultra
At least the exynos 2200 is actually not too much behind the Snapdragon 8 gen 1 which is pretty good which means that the exynos 2200 isn't as disappointing as it first seemed. Although the battery life between the 2 are gonna intresting to see.
I think they are throttling the power of the SD 8 gen 1 to make exynos 2200 look less bad.
@@Dylan-pp5fg or maybe the exynos just isn't as bad as it's portrayed to be... Either way the performance isn't what I'm interested in it's the battery life. If it's worse then last year's then that's gonna be pretty horrible.
@@Dylan-pp5fg if you think they're throttling to match the performance of exynos 2200 then you don't know how hot this shit gets on phones which are not optimised to handle the heat on phones with full clocked performance
@@Dylan-pp5fg go watch a test of sd gen 1on other phones and see how it becomes a literal sun and if u see some trailers about Samsung then tell if they are throttling the performance or underclocking it with a new cooling system so it doesn't become a heater.
Off the video path
I didn't think you were an Asian person but that's cool I love Asians very much and trust them 🥰
Great and fair video. We appreciate your work and interest, but I think that all devices in the video are very powerful and can do anything, and this is great. I think that the main causes of some problems are software and game developers, not processors.
I'm from Singapore which is in Asia :)
@@GoldenReviewer
Awesome, I'm from Palestine and it's also in Asia ❤
@@relax.b13 He is from China, but stay in Singapore. His accent definitely not like singaporean. He also posted his video in chinese language on Bilibili site where the way he speak chinese much formal than regular singaporean.
@@lancelot_sin6351
I don't know what the Singaporeans look like, but I know what the Chinese look like, but it doesn't matter, we are all brothers 🥰
Fantastic video mate !
The best real technology test reviews on TH-cam thank you.please make battery test .thank you.
Thank you so much for making such a fantastic review. great job!
Awesome review bro
I know you because of Twitter
Some know my TH-cam because of Twitter;
Some know my Twitter because of TH-cam.
I like it both ways.
@@GoldenReviewer 😅😅
Would you consider running all the gfxbench tests one at a time allowing cool down between them for all devices to see effects of thermal throttling on later tests?
Try different battery mode (optimized/high/max)
Great video! Thanx. Did you make the video after the first day patch for the s22s, or right out of the box?
S22 Ultra had a big Launch day Update today (over 800MB). Too bad you didn't test it with the new Update.
I've tried, benchmark scores mostly the same. I think it's a big fix update only
Ok thanks!
You have to test CPU Throttling Test with 100 threads and 30 minutes! Take a look Options. SD888, SD8G1 have a biggest throttling after 20 minutes.
You should do another test with Moto X30 or other 8 Gen1 phones to see how the phone performance compared to the competition
Especially GFXBENCH
I think situation can be improved with rumours new snapdragon gen 1 plus coming on tsmc node it help snapdragon with efficiency thus further improving performance hope it launch soon
it will launch but samsung wont use it this year since they have already released the s22 series
@@freaksz3352 they might use it for fold and flip
@@wexorfrost2315 i doubt that.Afterall we are talking about samsung🤣
We all gonna be surprised if this happens
@@freaksz3352 I guess we'll have to wait and see
This was really helpful. Thank you
Should of done the benchmarks after running a CPU and GPU intensive benchmark and then see how they perform after 20 mins of use. I bet they would all be similar.
I am happy that my 1 year old iphone 12, beats all of them in single core & multi-core scores in Geekbench.
Just as I thought, the SD Gen 1 seems to provide the superior performance if you are into gaming/GPU intensive tasks, but it can also be hotter and more power-hungry than the Exynos.
I really thought AMD is gonna propel exynos forward, but I guess not, here’s hoping that this is just first gen product quirks
I hope they make a way to fully optimize the graphics though.
I remember all samsung fanboys saying bionic chips would be crused this year with amd🤣 wish i could fine them comments. Years behind still
@@Randomdude21-e nah bro it was the leaked number by amd that created the hype, no one had faith in exynos. But the exynos 2200 do have much better frame stability than the 8gen 1 in longer gaming session , so I don’t think it is “years behind”, especially when snapdragon seems to be stuck as well, they aren't really doing anything other than increasing the watts
@@dustcake2576 years behind bionic chips
Exynos is exynos and it's crap, it's that simple :P
Very interesting comparison,
Please add also the Work 3.0 battery life test results, it can provide a reliable system to estimate also the battery life of these devices
Can you test the iPhone 13 pro max in genshin impact with 120 fps with the razer chroma cooler please for long term like an hour or more.
Genshin cant reach 120 fps
@@albertcaytuiro3770 in iOS it can
@@apostle9209 Theretically yes, the iPhone cant nearly run at 120fps though
@@apostle9209 can’t, you don’t see the latest comparation? 13 pro Max can barely get 90 fps in 120Fps option mode
Genshin isn't optimised good for 120 fps, the iPhone can run it at 120 fps and has the horsepower to run it at stable 120 fps but it's get hot so that's why he should test it with the razer chroma cooler.
Please do a camera photo test of both s22 ultra devices.
I did the same Wild Life Extreme Stress Test on my S22 Ultra SD8G1, my stats:
Best Loop Score: 2568
Lowest Loop Score: 1525
Stability: 59.4%
Battery: 69% to 56%
Temperature: 27C to 41C
Frame rate: 7FPS to 19FPS
Seems like either something improved or I hit silicon lottery :)
My guess: You ambient temperature’s lower than mine
@@GoldenReviewer Could be, though it's totally normal winter climate here, I just put the phone next to my nightstand and let it do its thing lol
However, that lowest score difference seems quite huge, I can't really say why it is this way, but who knows
Great comparison as always
1:19 face revealed....
Great video!
Moving the detector too fast to get the reading right , Slow it down a little.
Otherwise great video
Can you do emulation test like AetherSX2?
Tysm for the review!
Snapdragon doing a great job on their end, exynos still lagging behind.
All these tests were continous or were they done after giving breaks?
Love this video! Thanks
Exceptional work done here 🙏
Sd is getting high temperature, very good performance at the moment for exynos 2200.
So basically all the media is spreading some enthusiast 5s benchmark propaganda about exynos? Nice. Thank you for your test! For a 1st try by AMD this is a good result. :-)
I ran the geekbench 5 test on my s22 ultra snapdragon variant. Results were very unstable. I did it 3 times.
1st: 416 & 1416
2nd: 973 & 3271
3rd: 1068 & 2332
Can you please explain why these numbers are so different and low?
How is your phone currently?
Is this after the update and are both the phones on VBH firmware?
I've been waiting for this
The king returns. Awesome video
⚠️There are terrible issue with benchmark in Korea.⚠️
because samsung uses 'Game Optimizing Service' to limit⛔️ actual working only except for benchmark apps.
CPU performance lip so low that non gamer user can just skip more than 3-4 generation
Thank you for the test...i want to buy an s21 ultra with exynos 2100.....i m pubg pro player....i played with phone snpdrgn 865....no problem...some times it bugs....and heat....i want to change the phone...to s21 ultra..but in my contry there is only s21 ultra with exynos....any advice ? Should i buy it ? Any lag..heat ..for pubg...? I play over 4h in day
First like the video and then watch. Best youtuber 👍👍👍👍👍
This is a great video, thanks a lot
Hey Golden Reviewer,
When possible can you review the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra?
Amazing vids as always
Good tests! New processors seem quite disappointing compared to last gen.
thank you for leaving the label above them
Hi, I'm curious kindly add snapdragon and exynos note 20 ultra. I'm planning to upgrade from my Snapdragon N10+5G but I'm focused more on sustained gaming performance, I want to see how stable it is compared to s22 series
Ignore the note 20 ultra exynos, alot of fps dips , bad battery. If you can get then sd one, go for it
Samsung manipulated benchmark. They are banned from Geekbench. Performance of s22 is worse than s20.
Which is the best s21 ultra or s22 ultra? (snapdragon)
We want see this phones doing battery life test
4:08 even Exynos 2100 Deathroned SD8 gen 1
I thought this year samsung will finally beat snapdragon but it didn't happen. Samsung Exynos chip is trying to beat the snapdragon chip but the snapdragon chip is always making sure to stay on top. The competition is getting tight.
Can't wait for you to review red magic 7
Are these all brand new phones? (the 21 series)
Have to admit.. I subbed mainly for the golden retriever profile. But great objective reviews too! Really useful to provide benchmarks with context and thermals.
Keep up the good work!
This years CPU upgrade is so disappointing for everything except GPU. There is basically no improvements at all in CPU performance or efficiency.
They never said there is a big jump in cpu. Samsung literally says 5% faster on their website. The cpu is more than fast enough anyway
@@propersod2390 It's fast enough? Who are you to judge that? Even if it is. Is basically zero CPU improvements in 1 year of development acceptable? They didnt even improve efficiency, from some tests it looks like it's even worse. People are hoping Android will make ground on Apple performance and efficiency lead, but instead Apple seems to be pulling away improving performance and efficiency every year while Android is just stuck with minimal improvements but yet charge the same prices.
Can someone enlighten me. S22 ultra be it SD8gen or exypnos. These processor havent yet been optimised yet right?
Thats explain why the battery drain kinda bad.
9:55 что-то жарко стало
Please make videos S22 ultra vs S22 plus battery drain, test gaming test etc..
SD865 It is enough for anyone and the consumption is much lower. For me, the 865 is still the best. I hope my terminal will last a long time. I don't want to lose the 3.5 jack or microSD. lg v60
Best comparison video 👍 as we see Samsung exynos 2200 really bad situation with reality.İ think Samsung should change CPU /Exynos departments who has decided this CPU,
It’s wonderful how exynos has caught up. A15 would destroy all