The Falcon is one of the all time greats...veteran driver Frank Gardner won the British touring car championships in the 1960s...After racing a GT 40 at Le Mans...
I'm An Australian, And LOVE Them all..Mini's Escorts, Galaxies,Falcons..Alfa's ALL available RHD.. The MUSTANGS as you know are available RHD now..FORD..
im an australian.. bathurst sucks.. after 88.. i own a dodge challenger, 340 r/t. #1.. & 4 u.s. ford 4x4rs, from 62 - 02.. s.a. moonta. you can polish sht as much as you want,, but its still a holden..[ with a 9'' diff ].. [ as run at bathurst.. ]
I am very disappointed there are no Hillman IMP's on the grid when they won both class and overall in the 60's! Hartwell, Fraser & Bevan Imps were all a joy to behold back in the day!
I'd like to compliment the two commentators on their coverage of this classic race. (No advertising on the cars, just the numbers - so nostalgic!) The commentary never diverges from the actual race itself. No superfluous statistics or other extraneous remarks. No showing-off about how much they know. (Many racing commentators are frustrated drivers). These two guys call the race from start to finish, lie horse racing. Just stick to the action. Thanks whoever you are, that's how to do it.
It would be interesting if the evolution of car technology, much like how Gundam returned to close-combat due to Minovsky particles, leads to the resurgence of drift driving in racing.
They should do as nascar does and throw a safety caution where everyone comes in at the same time 48 ninety second pitstop, and then proceeds in the order they came in.
Who decides what type of vehicle the drivers drive? Do they get to choose what car they drive? It seems an unfair advantage that the v8 cars have over the minis. I am just curious about it. It’s great racing no matter what they drive! I enjoy it. Thanks for sharing!
In the States, Falcons had nowhere to race that the public, at large, knew of. Grand National (Galaxie-sized) cars got all the headlines. In 1960, a race for compact cars was tried by NASCAR, the governing body of stock car racing, but it was a blowout for Chrysler Valiants, which had an enormous horsepower edge over the Falcons and Corvairs, as there were not yet V-8 engines in compacts, and the series was abandoned. Valiants came home 1st through 7th, I believe.
The Falcons stayed and raced as they were run in the Monte Carlo rally by Alan Mann racing. The Galaxies in the UK,63 and 64 were replaced by the 64 ex Tour de France Mustangs, the Falcons although older were replacing the Mustangs as the rules were more relaxed and allowed the Falcons better performance. Camaros came across the pond as well, 67/68 versions then the 1970 versions, always made for an interesting mix. Think in the early seventies there was even a 1970 hemi Cuda .
Such a shame about the Hart's Alfa Romeo. Did not see it again after Pit Window. Does anyone have any info about the car? At the beginning it really put on a show and was passed over , for a while, by the commentators as they were more interested in talking up the Cortinas.
Correct! The commentators are unaware that the Mustang used the identical platform, originally created for the Falcon. Perhaps there's a different weight bias. I owned a '67 Mustang with the 4.7 V-8, and it was quite tail happy.
Mustangs I think have a 1200kg homologated weight the falcons thanks to the work of Holman moody has lots of trick bits homologated and have a much lower weight they can run at. Although I seem to think Mustangs can run fatter tyres than the falcons. Both run 400hp plus engines some probably have. Questionable engines too
@@wilberthickmann That`s the official result but they only "won" because Holman-Moody`s Ford Falcon was given a "too big engine penalty" late saturday night after winning every stage.
You mean the guy who can't tell a Falcon from a Galaxie, in this race? I saw Goodwood , it was fine. Go back to welding, porky. Maybe you'll get better at it, than your race watching.
@@sludge8506 Google is your friend jr. There are plenty of V8s over 15 liters. Apparently they don’t have Street Outlaws in your neck of the woods. I tried to post links but YT deleted them.
Nothing left of the original cars apart from the shape and maybe the engine block LOL, everything has had massive money spent on it or been changed...just for those folk who think this is how they drove🤣
Thank you so much for sharing!
The Falcon is one of the all time greats...veteran driver Frank Gardner won the British touring car championships in the 1960s...After racing a GT 40 at Le Mans...
its slightly bigger than the mustang but its ligther
That weekend was such a blast ! ! ! 🏁🏁🏁
More passing in the first turn than in the last 50 years of F1.
If I could give you 100 thumbs up I would?
I'm An Australian, And LOVE Them all..Mini's Escorts, Galaxies,Falcons..Alfa's ALL available RHD.. The MUSTANGS as you know are available RHD now..FORD..
im an australian.. bathurst sucks.. after 88.. i own a dodge challenger, 340 r/t. #1.. & 4 u.s. ford 4x4rs, from 62 - 02.. s.a. moonta. you can polish sht as much as you want,, but its still a holden..[ with a 9'' diff ].. [ as run at bathurst.. ]
FALCONS not Galaxies (though a single Galaxie is in race) … and yes, the Falcons were homologated with fiberglass fenders by Holman Moody in 1964.
Fantastic racing 🐎 ! 👌😊👍
Neil Buxton Howard from south Africa Port Elizabeth says old school 60s racing still the best keep it up
The Cortinas have always been my favorite, but that Falcon was a ripper 😮
I am very disappointed there are no Hillman IMP's on the grid when they won both class and overall in the 60's! Hartwell, Fraser & Bevan Imps were all a joy to behold back in the day!
45:16 I was on the exit of copse, one of the best saves I've ever seen. He was about 10cm from the barrier but still kept so much speed
Your right the mustang was created from the V8 falcon platform and didn't change until 67.
The Cortina’s are awesome.
I'd like to compliment the two commentators on their coverage of this classic race. (No advertising on the cars, just the numbers - so nostalgic!) The commentary never diverges from the actual race itself. No superfluous statistics or other extraneous remarks. No showing-off about how much they know. (Many racing commentators are frustrated drivers). These two guys call the race from start to finish, lie horse racing. Just stick to the action. Thanks whoever you are, that's how to do it.
Marvlous, thanks 😀
The Mustang is a re-bodied Falcon.
Gracias gran carrera 👌👏
It would be interesting if the evolution of car technology, much like how Gundam returned to close-combat due to Minovsky particles, leads to the resurgence of drift driving in racing.
They should do as nascar does and throw a safety caution where everyone comes in at the same time 48 ninety second pitstop, and then proceeds in the order they came in.
Who was the mad lad that went flying thru the runoff in the 1st 3 corners? the black ford 😂
I thought the early Mustangs were built on the Falcon frame.
PROPER CARS, PROPER RACING.....!!
Who decides what type of vehicle the drivers drive? Do they get to choose what car they drive? It seems an unfair advantage that the v8 cars have over the minis. I am just curious about it. It’s great racing no matter what they drive! I enjoy it. Thanks for sharing!
In the States, Falcons had nowhere to race that the public, at large, knew of. Grand National (Galaxie-sized) cars got all the headlines. In 1960, a race for compact cars was tried by NASCAR, the governing body of stock car racing, but it was a blowout for Chrysler Valiants, which had an enormous horsepower edge over the Falcons and Corvairs, as there were not yet V-8 engines in compacts, and the series was abandoned. Valiants came home 1st through 7th, I believe.
The Falcons stayed and raced as they were run in the Monte Carlo rally by Alan Mann racing.
The Galaxies in the UK,63 and 64 were replaced by the 64 ex Tour de France Mustangs, the Falcons although older were replacing the Mustangs as the rules were more relaxed and allowed the Falcons better performance.
Camaros came across the pond as well, 67/68 versions then the 1970 versions, always made for an interesting mix.
Think in the early seventies there was even a 1970 hemi Cuda .
Such a shame about the Hart's Alfa Romeo. Did not see it again after Pit Window. Does anyone have any info about the car? At the beginning it really put on a show and was passed over , for a while, by the commentators as they were more interested in talking up the Cortinas.
IH WOW VERY COOL
Yeah, the Falcon won! And what is a mustang? Just a re-skinned Falcon!
Correct! The commentators are unaware that the Mustang used the identical platform, originally created for the Falcon. Perhaps there's a different weight bias. I owned a '67 Mustang with the 4.7 V-8, and it was quite tail happy.
@@barrykochverts4149 I owned a 67 Mustang fastback GTA with a 390ci 335 hp engine. There was not a 4.7 V-8 in that year.
I had a 67 coupe with a 302. Was not stock I don't think
Mustangs I think have a 1200kg homologated weight the falcons thanks to the work of Holman moody has lots of trick bits homologated and have a much lower weight they can run at. Although I seem to think Mustangs can run fatter tyres than the falcons. Both run 400hp plus engines some probably have. Questionable engines too
Love this type of racing beats the pants off F1.
Ford Falcon, the car that actually won Rally Monte Carlo in 1964
Paddy Hopkirk & Henry Liddon won the '64 Monte Carlo Rally in a Mini Cooper S
@@wilberthickmann That`s the official result but they only "won" because Holman-Moody`s Ford Falcon was given a "too big engine penalty" late saturday night after winning every stage.
The mighty Eco Hero Minis out to save the world vs the Monsters the mean V8 guzzlers
Why do the cortina’s run the exhaust out the back of the car and not out the side
It’s a shame the small engine battle is ignored.
who are the commentators ? Both are brilliant but one sounds like Jeremy Vine ? he does Goodwood too
Thinking about going this year, was it any good?
Always! But then we're biased 😆
A Mustang is a Falcon with bucket seats
Falcons were better balanced cars and could outhandle mustangs, ford hated that.
MARCEDRIC KIRBY FOUNDER CEO.
MARCEDRIC KIRBY INC.
Far out. We only get to see the mustangs.
Estafa empleo estable
thank you for having male announcers, Goodwood was barely watchable this year
You must have been watching a different Goodwood. One from the 1950s perhaps.
Rubbish.
You mean the guy who can't tell a Falcon from a Galaxie, in this race? I saw Goodwood , it was fine. Go back to welding, porky. Maybe you'll get better at it, than your race watching.
😮
I rather enjoyed the weaker sex
Big 5 liter V8? 5 liters is small for a V8. Some race cars in America are over 15 liters.
15 liters equals 915 cubic inches.
I don’t think so, champ.
@@sludge8506
Google is your friend jr. There are plenty of V8s over 15 liters. Apparently they don’t have Street Outlaws in your neck of the woods. I tried to post links but YT deleted them.
@@sludge8506
Google is you friend Jr. there are plenty of V8s larger than 15 liters.
@@fredflintstone505 🤪🤪🤪🤪 I bet your mom is proud of you, champ. 🤦🏻♂️
@@sludge8506
You bet she is. How many 15 liters V8s did you find when you googled them? I tried to post links, but TH-cam kept deleting them.
Real cars. Real racing. This current breed of cars suck. Computer controlled
Silverstone was such a great track. Its a Mickey-Mouse ring now. Disappointing.
Nothing left of the original cars apart from the shape and maybe the engine block LOL, everything has had massive money spent on it or been changed...just for those folk who think this is how they drove🤣
We're so glad you know so much about each of the 60 cars. Thank you.
@@samuelgarrod8327 You're welcome...Ive owned them 40 years LOL The "big, heavy" cars are not at all, they are empty red bull tis,...drama hype
@@markholroyde9412 You must be new to touring cars.
@@leftpastsaturn67 .....and you must be new to "life" snowflake🤣 born after 1990? cant grasp reality versus fake news.🤣