I understood that there’s will always have a contradiction around eco tourism once since the transport we take generates impact to the global warming but it’s much better than travel all around luxury services and including that we know that business overseas impact much more and those are the ones we should debate the efficiency to tackle the global warming.
If you see any beautiful quiet places, foolishly don't share on social media or even with friends, which brings in more tourists and spoils the place. Social media is spoiling beautiful quiet places by bringing in more tourists.
Those tourists would go somewhere else and spend money there, contributing to the climate change in that process. So if the money they would spend anyway is spent on eco tourism, at least it will have some positive impact as local govenments and communities would try to protect habitats instead of destorying them in the name of developmet or by neglecting.
I don’t think tourism's footprint should include food because the tourists would be eating food at home if they weren't on tour, and probably similarly impactful food considering their economic profile.
I'm from Costa Rica, basically since we are born we are told to take care of the environment and animals, of course there is always bad people who don't follow the rules, but the majority of ticos will do their best to take care of our small country's environment
I wish you had undertaken an investigation of efficacy or otherwise of the various carbon offsetting programmes - if that was even mentioned, it was so short that I missed it.
Yeah, it could be, but it should have a Good management, sometimes the bussinessman are only think about how to get earn money without thinking about environment and the status of animal is endangered or not.. So many thinks when we want to focus on eco-tourism in our country.
If there is one international law that bans all the private jets either for presidents or celebrities, the carbon dioxide emissions will significantly reduced. Perhaps we can reach our climate change goals in a very short term.
If we put an end to ecotourism there would be no incentive for people to preserve the environments that tourists come to see. Which is worse bringing in the tourists or giving the locals no opportunities except illegal logging and mining? We all have to make a living in the places where we live. There is a cost for every choice we make. We just have to make the better choices.
I think the problem is not to crowd a place with a plane of tourists or so,is the trashy stuff they all are backpacking on , because u need the tourist system in for the local communities to do livehooding possible,u as an underdevelopping countrh like costa rica or any other latin america the ttourist is require just think about the hawaii too 😅.
Very superficial approach. Among all the different reason for climate change, tourism is definitely not the first one. But- ecotourism is in many cases the MAIN reason for nature conservation in many developing countries. Without ecotourism you can forget from the African big animals and the rainforest reserves, as simply as that. Keep travel, enjoy the world, contribute to conservation and local communities and ignore this video.
I understood that there’s will always have a contradiction around eco tourism once since the transport we take generates impact to the global warming but it’s much better than travel all around luxury services and including that we know that business overseas impact much more and those are the ones we should debate the efficiency to tackle the global warming.
If you see any beautiful quiet places, foolishly don't share on social media or even with friends, which brings in more tourists and spoils the place. Social media is spoiling beautiful quiet places by bringing in more tourists.
Those tourists would go somewhere else and spend money there, contributing to the climate change in that process.
So if the money they would spend anyway is spent on eco tourism, at least it will have some positive impact as local govenments and communities would try to protect habitats instead of destorying them in the name of developmet or by neglecting.
Qqqq😊q😊q
Really staggering documentary regarding ambient.
Your dedication to your craft is inspiring.
Very thought provoking details of tourism,,,,,
I don’t think tourism's footprint should include food because the tourists would be eating food at home if they weren't on tour, and probably similarly impactful food considering their economic profile.
That is a very good point
I'm from Costa Rica, basically since we are born we are told to take care of the environment and animals, of course there is always bad people who don't follow the rules, but the majority of ticos will do their best to take care of our small country's environment
I wish you had undertaken an investigation of efficacy or otherwise of the various carbon offsetting programmes - if that was even mentioned, it was so short that I missed it.
Saludob dese collombia grandes impactos del turismo .En una región llamada salento!
Click here to subscribe to our channel 👉🏽 bbc.in/3VyyriM
Is the very good thing that people do and leading them to the better Chang in their life..
Thanks for giving details about natural park in Africa parks sight is amazing hunters also should protect wild animals like pumba 😅
I like this type of episode because i like to nature🌿🍃 when do i see the trees🌲🌳🌴 and animals🐵🐔🐶🐷 really good feels me
Yeah, it could be, but it should have a Good management, sometimes the bussinessman are only think about how to get earn money without thinking about environment and the status of animal is endangered or not.. So many thinks when we want to focus on eco-tourism in our country.
YES!!!! i went to Antarctica to see the penguins i gave them grass seeds .. they did not eat them but the place is alive with weeds now
If there is one international law that bans all the private jets either for presidents or celebrities, the carbon dioxide emissions will significantly reduced. Perhaps we can reach our climate change goals in a very short term.
Eco-tourism is one of the reasons why wildlife dynamics is disturbed.
Пора понемногу привыкать к тому,что привычного туризма больше не будет,придется accommodate to a new form of that
Somewhat meanwhile taking risking
If we put an end to ecotourism there would be no incentive for people to preserve the environments that tourists come to see. Which is worse bringing in the tourists or giving the locals no opportunities except illegal logging and mining? We all have to make a living in the places where we live. There is a cost for every choice we make. We just have to make the better choices.
I think the problem is not to crowd a place with a plane of tourists or so,is the trashy stuff they all are backpacking on , because u need the tourist system in for the local communities to do livehooding possible,u as an underdevelopping countrh like costa rica or any other latin america the ttourist is require just think about the hawaii too 😅.
A victim of its own success? YES!! Sadly we're seeing how a national park is destroyed... Las Baulas National Marine Park has its own history to tell.
Eco tourism is like a zigaretfilter...its a tiny bit better but still killng you.
The moment you enter a plane your carbon footprint explodes.
i can see anything
Victim of its own success...
There is no such thing as eco tourism, unless you go for a pilgrimage and sleep under open sky
Very superficial approach.
Among all the different reason for climate change, tourism is definitely not the first one. But- ecotourism is in many cases the MAIN reason for nature conservation in many developing countries.
Without ecotourism you can forget from the African big animals and the rainforest reserves, as simply as that.
Keep travel, enjoy the world, contribute to conservation and local communities and ignore this video.
No!!!
😣 *promosm*
🫡❤️📚📚💪💪