0:04 basic definition of the concept of human rights 0:39 history of HR 1:18 international human rights law (UDHR) 2:32 why is it hard to maintain HR 3:56 european convention on HR 4:13 questions about HR
@@gaussminigun this argument of yours is very nuanced. Roads are built from the taxpayers and the infrastructure budget, yet indigenous peoples can still use the said roads. Why make it different for food? A physiological need? The government can subsidise this. Give tax breaks and incentives to companies and businesses to manufacture foods for the government to distribute.
How can you ensure that someone living in Sahara desert has ample water? Unless you can ensure that for everyone everytime and everywhere, it is not a human right.
@@selfishcapitalist3523 You cant ensure the freedom of everyones speech. How can you ensure it in North Korea, this applies to the right to live, own guns etc. This argument is bad.
The biggest barrier to human rights is not dictatorships and the groups that persecute others; but those who blindly make excuses for human rights abuses whether through nationalism or ignorance.
others,* I think the biggest barrier to human rights is dictatorships and groups that persecute others because, without dictatorships and groups that persecute others, there would be no excuses for human rights abuses because there would be no abuses in the first place.
Miggs_SK- Science lover Migration is a human right, it's described under the Right of Movement. Of course it's up to the individual country, and one country can't take them all, but it's good in principle to work for a reality where everyone has an escape route.
In the era of digitalization, law needs to be adapted to protect and safeguard fundamental rights. One can see that digital rights can be closely linked to freedom of expression and privacy. Therefore in my opinion an individual should have the right to access the internet to avoid digital divide. Additionally, an individual should have control over who stores their personal data etc,; the right to privacy.
@i'm the king I believe Religion is not the basis or source from which morals stem from, but rather, the other way around. I believe that morals are the basis from which religion stems from. Without morals, religion will be worthless and meaningless, and there will be no longer any need to follow them. But in spite of popular belief, morals exist beyond the scope and boundaries of religion. After all, morals are inherent to human relationships, and without morals, there will be no meaningful relationships between people. Morals form the basis for social interaction and bonding between humans. And the inverse is true. Without human relationships, there will be no need for morals, and any morals that we implement will be futile and meaningless. Therefore, I believe the source of morals is the human desire to form relationships with other humans and bring meaning to those interactions.
The problem is too many people are shameless liars that pretend humans all agree on what a human right should be. The term "human rights" is being manipulated around the world for nationalist, political and ethnic causes.. The first thing we need to do is narrow down the definition of human rights to something that is agreed upon in practice not just virtue signalling
Hi Universal rights is a treaty established by the ONU after the Second World War, it is a declaration where it addresses violations and other aspects that welcome vulnerable people and govern all their needs
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed in Paris on December 10, 1948, establishes, for the first time, fundamental human rights, enshrined in 30 articles, where they acquire the importance of universal by promoting social progress, equality, justice and the freedom of friendly relations between nations.
People stop being so negative. Human rights seems more like a objective to strive for. Are world is not perfect but we can try to help people get some rights.
@@benkaufman4159 genocide is ok from the perspective of the perpetrators and those who stand to benefit from it. It is obviously not ok from the perspective of the victims. For example, Americans glorify Columbus, Washington and Jackson, who played huge roles in killing or dispossessing Native Americans of their lands. These figures are glorified because their genocidal actions helped make America and its white settlers prosperous. Therefore, from the perspective of Americans, the genocide of Native Americans is a blessing
Then we have to figure out just how "universal" all our universal rights are. Do they apply to children? Babies? Animals? Criminals? The mentally incompetent? Sentient robots? And if you have a "right" to not be denied something like education, does this mean that the education system doesn't have the right to charge for their services? Which right outweighs the other?
***** In Disctric 9 all aliens were kept in getto like Jews were. Germany political stand said Jews were not human and they were not treated as such by the law. Right now are still split into countries as humans as we have not transcended to the stage of thinking about ourself as such big groups.
+asdfers A criminal doesn't have the right to freedom of movement. And yet a criminal is 100% human. Should we set all criminals free? Is the right to freedom of movement a "phony" right? Or is it merely not universal and inalienable like people want to pretend?
+asdfers Interesting, so let's take your right to keep intruders off your property. Is it universal and inalienable? If cops show up at your house and claim they have a report that you stockpile drugs, dangerous animals and weapons of mass destruction on your property, and they have a warrant to search the house, do you have a universal and inalienable right to keep these intruders off your property? Is their right to enter your house and search it to keep others safe a "phony" right? Or is your "keep intruders off" right not universal and inalienable like you want to pretend?
+Shawn Ravenfire looks like we need aliens to judge whether we even have the appropriate basic human rights and compare ours to them and see how we could improve ours or mutually
That is merely what is called psychological algebra actually was why it was X, where both X and Y are undefined and have no value whatsoever. In short: meaningless waffle which you cannot even begin to define; No more than religion which is any set of related unquestioned beliefs assumption presumptions and norms (that complete nonsense that men call morals or ethics)
Lot's of human rights contradict each other. The right to education and the right to choose your profession runs into a problem when not enough people choose to be teachers
*The universal human right is to give everybody the chance to learn how life really works in every facet and to learn what you ultimate purpose in life really is. True equality, peace and justice will never be established by mankind, because mankind means mindkind*. It is our overbearing mind that seeks power and pleasure that causes all the suffering and this needs to change. Learning how life works will teach you everything about life including how the nature of the mind works and how to change it permantly. It is the universal purpose of the human race. Google *TruthContest read the Present*
I need a little help, I appreciate who can contribute with a very small and small donation to buy food here in my Country Venezuela, currently the super inflation we live does not allow our salaries to cover our demands for food, in that sense I only require a small contribution to Which will give good use among my relatives My Wallet: 3EWUpwmvQncwyyVaazc8JMVodvV1YJFnTv
((...we do know what makes life worth living. The people ...loved and they were loved. They were mothers and fathers; they were husbands and wives; sisters and brothers; sons and daughters; friends and neighbors. They had hopes for the future and they had dreams that were not yet fulfilled. And if there’s anything to take away from this …it’s the reminder life is very fragile. Our time here is limited and it is precious. And what matters at the end of the day is not the small things, it’s not the trivial things, which so often consume us and our daily lives. Ultimately, it’s how we choose to treat one another and how we love one another. It’s what we do on a daily basis to give our lives meaning and to give our lives purpose. That’s what matters. At the end of the day, what we’ll remember will be those we loved and what we did for others. That’s why we’re here.)) - President Obama 🔥 🔥
I believe in universal human rights and I loved this video. Hopefully, in the future, more countries will accept this idea, and that more people will live peacefully irrespective of personal differences.
You need to read more and not just take what you hear for granted. Universal human rights are an outdated idea, held up by literal globalists. Human rights are imaginary, not part of your genes. Just like you don't have a soul, you don't have any rights, either. There is no magical forcefield of "rights" protecting you and your rights from being violated. Not by nature, not by people. You have to do that yourself, or enter into a collective nation with other people, who can protect you and the things you value to be a "right". And when you do one day sit down and try coming up with original ideas, what you think the rights should be in your nation, you will find they are not universal. You will even find that some rights conflict with each other, and that you have to prioritize between them. Good luck on your journey. Hope I dispelled some myths.
@@Google_Censored_Commenter There's an ideologist, and there's a realist. Human rights are an ideal. An ideal of a better world, one that we respect each other. Although your point might be more realistic, it's the ideal we're talking about here.
@@Google_Censored_Commenter Then it's what you decided. You're not an idealist. It's OK. Not everyone is supposed to be an idealist, and I respect that.
@@aiosquadron Kinda puts wrench in the 'universal' part of universal human rights if a group of people can choose not believe in them and therefore aren't willing to enforce them.
"Human Rights" only exist so long as there are people to acknowledge those rights. It is a mutually beneficial agreement. If no one acknowledges your "human rights", it will be as if you never had any to start with.
human rights have been created for everyone no matter where we are from, there are organizations that support and control human rights but they are not a law so it is difficult to control that in all countries so that these rights are fulfilled
complete bulshit that " right as in rights" is a blaub and simply *Impossible* to focus or define. How can anyone speak of or claim what they cannot define- which -*No-one*?
Culture and education is more important than most people would think. In most Western nations, human rights seem obvious and "objective". But that's only because the concept of human rights mostly developed in the West. So in most other nations, even if they seem "developed" (like in Asia), they have little to no concept of human rights, due to lack of education about human rights, as well as lack of historical cultural context of having human rights.
Majin Brock Blanco 0,000001 por ciento what is the non western definition of human rights? Oh yeah that’s right, there isn’t one because they don’t have a concept of human rights.
Good talks. Wordwide "...an equal standard of human rights must be recognized and adopted. In the estimation of God all men are equal; there is no distinction or preferment for any soul in the dominion of His justice and equity." ~ Baha'i Faith
Digital Personality is a very important Human right. However the existing Carta was not efficent, but it has done a great job. The past was full of discussions about this carta. This by his own made the difference. Not many will remember their thoughts about this carta, but they do not even have to. It was a gohst hidden among us. Make it 31 know there is one, too.
The only individual rights a person has are any rights they themselves can enforce. If an individual can't enforce a given right by themselves and needs someone else, or some group, to enforce that right, it is no longer a right and is a privilege bestowed by that enforcement group. The pitch of universal human rights, is a pitch for a universal one world government. A government that can give you everything you want is a government that can take everything from you. If you want to truly give people rights, you must give them individually the power to enforce those rights themselves. This is why the 2nd amendment of the constitution in the United States of America is so debated and such a hot topic. On one hand people need arms to enforce their rights from criminal individuals and criminal governments, but on the other hand everyone having arms now has the power to end some one else right to life. Honestly, I personally think the idea of rights is just that, an idea, and in practice, in the real world, is nothing but legal fiction.
It is really disappointing to find out how so many people find themselves in positions of influence and use their power in an unfair and abusive way. Personally I don't think anyone should be in any position where they can get away with ignoring or blocking someone else's basic rights- whether it be a parent, a teacher, a local politician, a top-ranking government employee, etc. There are plenty of dysfunctions that are propagated by such forms of undue discrimination.
this is one of the best videos so far, i really enjoy TED-Ed it informs me and gives me small slises of life that i do enjoy so much. over all this is a grate chanel.
the importance of the standardization of democracy in the relation of the freedoms and the equities of the people, so as not to commit the mistakes of the past. It is the need of the UN, but of the freedom of nations.
Any career advice for someone who is a college senior in an unrelated major who didn't realize she was into international studies until her junior year? It is now my minor and I currently work at a small NGO, albeit as a graphic designer. I love what I do but interested in any thoughts on non-traditional entryways into working with or towards human rights.
When it comes to "Human Rights" I think of them as something that can be applied to the earliest humans. You have the right to speak and live in freedom, to defend yourself, practice your religious beliefs. You don't have the right to harm or restrict other's freedoms; you relinquish your rights when you trample another's. When people like to say housing or healthcare is a human right, that's where I start having issues. Yes, you have the right to build or buy housing for yourself, but you don't have the right to enforce someone to provide goods or services to you. Digital rights get a little murky with my ideal outlines of human rights, but I believe everyone has the right to privacy. However privacy is interpreted is up to the law makers but we should all agree that doxing of any kind should be illegal.
Eleanor Roosevelt, first US delegate to the United Nations.. she was pretty amazing all around. I don't think FDR could have served 4 successful terms of presidency without her.
Rather than ask what universal human rights should cover, it should first be questioned whether or not such things as rights actually exist, or whether we merely hold licences. For a right to be a right, it must be intrinsic and inalienable, yet when we talk about existing 'rights', all can, in certain circumstances, be alienated; for example, the right to life: certain States can end your life if you commit a certain offence, or your life may legitimately be taken from you by another private individual if acting in self-defence. As such, is it truly possible to argue that we all have a set of universal human rights, or do we instead only have a set of licences to life, free-speech, movement etc, that can be revoked in certain situations?
Clint Not sure I agree or fully understand what you're trying to say but a tyrant is a bad man in the eyes of the oppressed and any decent human being with a moral compass. I don't think you needed to blather on with nonsense.
You speak of morality, but how can one prove there are any moral truths at all? Demonstrate one. Let me see it with my eyes. Of course you think this is but "blathering nonsense." Morals are not to be seen or touched, but intuited through the "mind," or to put it less euphemistically, through the spirit! Morals are themselves spirits. And like all spiritual things they are figments of the imagination - lies, falsehoods, spooks. All morals were invented by particular people and groups to procure their own power. One who's power is secure need not be a "decent human being." Why should he? For fear of going to hell? There's no such thing. For fear of karma? Again, another lie. For fear of conscience? Only if he's possessed by one. Many "freethinkers" renounce a moral or two, but with great difficulty the conception “morality.” Morality is the “idea” of morals, their intellectual power, their power over the conscience; on the other hand, specific morals are too material to rule the mind, and do not fetter an “intellectual” man, a so-called “freethinker.” How easily they overcome "the sins of the flesh" and "the duty to one's nation." But morality in general rules many of these so-called "atheists"; for it, much like the Nation and the Truth, has been set upon the throne of the dead god. He who has power has "right." If you've followed me this far you might now say, "Wait! The morality I espoused, the rights I stood for, they were my means of acquiring power. Even more, they WERE my power! Yet you seek to take these from me." I do, if your empowerment is incompatible with my own, which is the case with those who's interests are secured through humanism and nationalism alike. Further, there exist no moralities which may procure power for myself and those close to me. The left wing manicheisms of today are at best under-powered weapons against the most virulent threats to my interest.
Clint morality is where we leave our caves, become neighbours and farm the land. Is where a community, rather than a tribe, is built. It changes as our communities change. It serves us, we do not serve morality, but we can make excuses adressing morality. Morality was before the Law, and it is possibly stronger. You can look up the play "Antigone" by Sophocles. The right correctly is a different thing; it is power. The interest is not a right, but the will behind the acquisition and exercise of a right. Practically, there are many different ways of getting your right exercised, depending on your status in your community. Thanks for just putting up with me. Just my thoughts.
Is an international document that states basic rights and fundamental freedoms to which all human beings are entitledand fundamental freedoms to which all human beings are entitled.
In recent events I've had my Human Rights violated in multiple ways including unfair pay, unreasonable actions taken against my freedom, including wrongful imprisonment. Obstruction of peace by "peace officers" aka APD and RPD. Almost as more of a bargaining/extortion strategy to achieve cooperation in personal conduct, that was in no way affecting them directly in accordance with the law. They would follow me home and this got to the point of APD moving across the street from me and taunting me using my schedule and natural movement (my tendency to leave home or go outside) to taunt me. Then progressed to the places (Home Depot, Frontier restaurant) I was visiting as having security profile me and make unfair judgement on my character. This to be summed up by enforcement waiting outside of my workplace and down my street with a red light on and stalking me. Thanks Michelle Lujan. P.S. I was doing nothing in-just.
What I most agree with in this presentation is that "human rights" is (just) an idea. Just because many of us value it doesn't mean it's objectively or universally true. From a survey of history and nations' government systems, it should be obvious human rights ARE privileges and they CAN be revoked. Governments do it all the time--both to their own citizens and to foreign citizens. The reason "it" gets incredibly complicated as soon as anyone tries to put the idea into practice is because, as with many human concepts, the idea is incompatible with the physical nature. Nature is not "just" or "fair" and has no obligation to mold the universe to satisfy human wants. All human beings are NOT born equal in dignity and rights because "dignity" is merely a perspective and rights, if they were naturally occurring and universal, like gravity, wouldn't need laws to enforce them. Videos, like this one, that argue some abstract human conception is true outside of some people's desires are the main reason I've stopped watching/listening to TED Talks. Please just stick to what the best hard, international evidence shows to be true--not just what feels good or sounds good.
@@OleStephens Hi I just noticed your reply.. yes the strong-arm... But the universal rights are nice because they remind us that we still have the rights,, it's just that they are sometimes *violated*
Rights are what make people's lives so essential as freedom, life, justice among many others and that around the world has become vulnerable because of selfishness and power.
The universal declaration of human rights should be within the constitution of all states and should be the enforceable basis for all international law. That’s just what I think I also think some of the rights as stated in the current declaration should be edited to remove vague and persisting ambiguities and establish a more focused and concise consensus on what is acceptable and justified under human rights law and human rights protections.
@@ou6775 Funny. 5 years after this comment, I will have just finished a 5 page assignment after slaughtering 5 pigs in 5 different slaughterhouses on 5 different days. Insane.
Five gives me 50 million billion gazillion that at no point in that essay do you set out a clear definition of either rights or a right, because you cannot possibly even begin to define a right without reference to cognates or synonyms or descriptions, can you? No shame in that, no more can anyone else even begin to define a right
note how at 3:28 the red line shows a border between Canada and the US but not between the ~12 European countries. This is how America views the world :)
I wish I could leave my country, Yemen, to a country that makes me feel safe and I can sleep in it without being afraid of the sound of planes and missiles I wish someone would feel my pain and fear How afraid I am that all my ambitions will end in ruins
You are thrown in prison when you have commited a felony, thereby making you a felon. Felons have some rights, but not all of them. I don't agree with that, but hey, it's the answer to your question
@@redchan2571 rights can be denied to people if there's a valid reason. One of those reasons is when someone can be a danger to the community and needs rehabilitation. There are exceptions for everything in the world
@@firebow2810 that is quite a dangerous stand to take if someone believes that such values are important though, governments in many countries has use the threat to their national security to deny some people human rights whether justified or not. More importantly is the fact that there are no international standards on what is "a threat" and should be locked up, thus theoretically this line of reasoning can apply to almost any action.
The universal human rights are fundamental for people, the las and norms are set for coexistence in a meeting of countries where the fundamental thing is justice and respecto for the differences of customs and religions.
@@Gadget-Walkmen appointing Saudi Arabia as head of the comitte for international protection of women's rights, allowing countries like China to dictate policy, allowing former Nazis like Kurt Waldheim to pass condemnations against Israel, scheduling dictators like Ghadaffi to win human rights awards, etc.
@@snakey934Snakeybakey to be fair China is it’s own country and unless the UN want war, China wouldn’t just obey any rule from an outside force so of course it’s own policy.
Which are no more than meaningless generalisations or vague woolly dreams which you cannot even begin to define because they were never in focus in the first place
I wish everyone in the world could watch this video - it’s so important and sometimes we forget that everyone has these rights.. which is so dangerous ⛔️
"The idea of human rights..." That is all that it is. It is an idea. It is something that remains inside the mind and when practiced can be apart of a REAL experience. Like a human shooting another human because they didn't have the "right" to do something. There are no differences between believing in human rights and santa claus. You can and will never actually see either of them. The children of course will believe in him when they see presents under the tree, just like we will believe in "rights", when someone threatens our life if we don't properly practice our non existent, imaginary friends we call rights. Please people wake up. We are fighting and killing over things that do not even exist.
Human rights are simple when viewed in the classically liberal context in which they were first recognized. It's only governments who secretly oppose them and try to subvert them that it gets complicated. Rights become applied to groups, even though by definition they must apply only to individuals (and any other way is tyrannical and oppressive). In the 1930s the progressive/fascist movement via FDR championed freedoms "from" things, which were just excuses for immoral and tyrannical control over individuals. Freedom cannot ever be "from" something; freedom can only be "to do" something. Freedom to speak. Freedom to think. Freedom to defend oneself. It's sick and perverse to create false freedoms from hunger, war, etc merely as a flimsy pretext to enslave people in big government tyranny. This is probably the single most hateful thing one human being can ever do to another, in fact.
I need to ask you a question. Do you have the right to have your rights enforced? Do you have the 'freedom from' having your 'freedoms to' violated? If someone is able to stop you from practicing your 'freedom to', do you have the right to be protected from them?
Internet access is not a human right. It costs money to lay cable, make computers, and provide service. No one can claim the right to force other people to pay for those things just b/c they want to watch cat videos on TH-cam.
+Naveen I think you missed the point slightly. Having internet as a right doesn't necesarrily mean that Governments will have to provide free access to it, but at least not block it, like it happens in some countries. Obviously it depends on how it will be written.
five years later and we still use this video for homework.
Truuth 😂😂💔
Ughh
Soooo true🤣🤣
lol yes
So it is not only me
7 years later and we still use this video for school work and homework wow.
0:04 basic definition of the concept of human rights
0:39 history of HR
1:18 international human rights law (UDHR)
2:32 why is it hard to maintain HR
3:56 european convention on HR
4:13 questions about HR
thx
Thanks for the time codes, but people don't skip watch the whole video.
Ramadan mubarak ❤❤❤❤
Goat
Water is a human right
Nestle: Heavy breathing
"food" is a product, which represents the labor of others. You do not have a right on other people's labor.
@@gaussminigun this argument of yours is very nuanced. Roads are built from the taxpayers and the infrastructure budget, yet indigenous peoples can still use the said roads.
Why make it different for food? A physiological need? The government can subsidise this. Give tax breaks and incentives to companies and businesses to manufacture foods for the government to distribute.
Africa doesn't have any water.
How can you ensure that someone living in Sahara desert has ample water? Unless you can ensure that for everyone everytime and everywhere, it is not a human right.
@@selfishcapitalist3523 You cant ensure the freedom of everyones speech. How can you ensure it in North Korea, this applies to the right to live, own guns etc. This argument is bad.
who's there for homework of online class?
Me
Me
th-cam.com/video/Zzf_BDDw-C0/w-d-xo.html
Me
Me
am i the only one that has this for homwework
Steph H nope
I have to do Rights vs Responsibilities.
Nope.
Steph H nope 👎
I do. I'm trying to find the history of these rights and why they were created
The biggest barrier to human rights is not dictatorships and the groups that persecute others; but those who blindly make excuses for human rights abuses whether through nationalism or ignorance.
others,*
I think the biggest barrier to human rights is dictatorships and groups that persecute others because, without dictatorships and groups that persecute others, there would be no excuses for human rights abuses because there would be no abuses in the first place.
Planetarianism!
Well, I wish that schools actually decide to teach our human rights, which point would it be abusive, and such
Miggs_SK- Science lover Migration is a human right, it's described under the Right of Movement. Of course it's up to the individual country, and one country can't take them all, but it's good in principle to work for a reality where everyone has an escape route.
this the one ^^^
SaudiArabia are head of the human rights council. 100% true. Let that sink into your minds.
+riddlers91 This needs to be upvoted.
+riddlers91 Sorry, not very informed about this, but how is it important? What does it mean if SaudiArabia is head of the human rights council?
+Mnakekeli Ngcamphalala They don't respect human rights over there; women are the biggest sufferers.
+Mnakekeli Ngcamphalala Saudi Arabia has one of the worst records on human rights.
+riddlers91 ... I honestly didn't believe you until I looked it up myself. I'm at a loss for words at how horrible that is.
Fun fact: everyone is here for online class
No, I'm just interested
🤔😮
Facts
Nah
yes
In the era of digitalization, law needs to be adapted to protect and safeguard fundamental rights. One can see that digital rights can be closely linked to freedom of expression and privacy. Therefore in my opinion an individual should have the right to access the internet to avoid digital divide. Additionally, an individual should have control over who stores their personal data etc,; the right to privacy.
@i'm the king I believe Religion is not the basis or source from which morals stem from, but rather, the other way around. I believe that morals are the basis from which religion stems from. Without morals, religion will be worthless and meaningless, and there will be no longer any need to follow them. But in spite of popular belief, morals exist beyond the scope and boundaries of religion. After all, morals are inherent to human relationships, and without morals, there will be no meaningful relationships between people. Morals form the basis for social interaction and bonding between humans. And the inverse is true. Without human relationships, there will be no need for morals, and any morals that we implement will be futile and meaningless. Therefore, I believe the source of morals is the human desire to form relationships with other humans and bring meaning to those interactions.
there is no "right" to privacy of data once you give your data into the care of others. You are delusional.
💯
The problem is too many people are shameless liars that pretend humans all agree on what a human right should be. The term "human rights" is being manipulated around the world for nationalist, political and ethnic causes.. The first thing we need to do is narrow down the definition of human rights to something that is agreed upon in practice not just virtue signalling
Peace is the best symbol you would present in times of diseases,death and great discussions!
Imagine only getting views because people are forced to watch the video for online class
I SWEAR HE FORCED US PFFFT
Facts
what? why?
Literally lmao I’m only here for school
Lol I'm watching this to see how many human rights were violated during this coof virus scam era 👍
Hi
Universal rights is a treaty established by the ONU after the Second World War, it is a declaration where it addresses violations and other aspects that welcome vulnerable people and govern all their needs
ya they literally just told us that 🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂
Humans rights mean everything to me.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed in Paris on December 10, 1948, establishes, for the first time, fundamental human rights, enshrined in 30 articles, where they acquire the importance of universal by promoting social progress, equality, justice and the freedom of friendly relations between nations.
what is a human right?
How was it the first time??
People stop being so negative. Human rights seems more like a objective to strive for. Are world is not perfect but we can try to help people get some rights.
Rex I agree
People don't deserve rights.. People should be illegal 🤮
@@artsyjempla5034 Wow! You're so self aware! Totally not a human being like everyone else!
@@mostafazahid1710 no, it's true, people don't deserve any rights, most of humans are terrible monsters
@@mostafazahid1710 and us monsters shouldn't have anything
Human rights is the greatest lie people tell. You have as much human rights as a government lets you have.
So a county can commit genocide on their citizens and it would be okay?
your idea is not new, it's called positive law or legal positivism.
@@benkaufman4159 that's not what he is saying
@@eshansalimi7246 its unfair, but why do I necessarily have a right to being treated fairly?
@@benkaufman4159 genocide is ok from the perspective of the perpetrators and those who stand to benefit from it. It is obviously not ok from the perspective of the victims. For example, Americans glorify Columbus, Washington and Jackson, who played huge roles in killing or dispossessing Native Americans of their lands. These figures are glorified because their genocidal actions helped make America and its white settlers prosperous. Therefore, from the perspective of Americans, the genocide of Native Americans is a blessing
Then we have to figure out just how "universal" all our universal rights are. Do they apply to children? Babies? Animals? Criminals? The mentally incompetent? Sentient robots? And if you have a "right" to not be denied something like education, does this mean that the education system doesn't have the right to charge for their services? Which right outweighs the other?
***** In Disctric 9 all aliens were kept in getto like Jews were.
Germany political stand said Jews were not human and they were not treated as such by the law.
Right now are still split into countries as humans as we have not transcended to the stage of thinking about ourself as such big groups.
+Shawn Ravenfire or is it also apply to the most closed human civilization like in wild tribe?
+asdfers A criminal doesn't have the right to freedom of movement. And yet a criminal is 100% human. Should we set all criminals free? Is the right to freedom of movement a "phony" right?
Or is it merely not universal and inalienable like people want to pretend?
+asdfers Interesting, so let's take your right to keep intruders off your property. Is it universal and inalienable?
If cops show up at your house and claim they have a report that you stockpile drugs, dangerous animals and weapons of mass destruction on your property, and they have a warrant to search the house, do you have a universal and inalienable right to keep these intruders off your property?
Is their right to enter your house and search it to keep others safe a "phony" right?
Or is your "keep intruders off" right not universal and inalienable like you want to pretend?
+Shawn Ravenfire looks like we need aliens to judge whether we even have the appropriate basic human rights and compare ours to them and see how we could improve ours or mutually
It have been 8 year but I still use this video to do my home work it helps me a lot thank you 💕
In Colombia, in spite of the war, the human rights they are a yearning for peace, freedom and social progress. We are all called to it's construction.
please share: Egyptian army kills innocent people in Sinai
1st video:
facebook.com/Hussam.Refai/videos/10159869539804202/?t=1
2nd video:
facebook.com/Hussam.Refai/videos/10159842243734202/?t=2
3rd video:
facebook.com/Hussam.Refai/videos/10159842247119202/?t=29
That is merely what is called psychological algebra actually was why it was X, where both X and Y are undefined and have no value whatsoever. In short: meaningless waffle which you cannot even begin to define; No more than religion which is any set of related unquestioned beliefs assumption presumptions and norms (that complete nonsense that men call morals or ethics)
@@vhawk1951kl what are you on about, i almost had a stroke reading that
@@gigabit6226 Pity it was only almost; why might I give a sh1t about a mouse(nothing and nobody) like you?
I learned that the human rights are one of the most important things in Human history .
Lot's of human rights contradict each other. The right to education and the right to choose your profession runs into a problem when not enough people choose to be teachers
*The universal human right is to give everybody the chance to learn how life really works in every facet and to learn what you ultimate purpose in life really is. True equality, peace and justice will never be established by mankind, because mankind means mindkind*. It is our overbearing mind that seeks power and pleasure that causes all the suffering and this needs to change. Learning how life works will teach you everything about life including how the nature of the mind works and how to change it permantly. It is the universal purpose of the human race. Google *TruthContest read the Present*
Just what i needed now.
well, I guess it's free to read then..
I need a little help, I appreciate who can contribute with a very small and small donation to buy food here in my Country Venezuela, currently the super inflation we live does not allow our salaries to cover our demands for food, in that sense I only require a small contribution to Which will give good use among my relatives
My Wallet: 3EWUpwmvQncwyyVaazc8JMVodvV1YJFnTv
the new parol of the world is:
shish
((...we do know what makes life worth living. The people ...loved and they were loved. They were mothers and fathers; they were husbands and wives; sisters and brothers; sons and daughters; friends and neighbors. They had hopes for the future and they had dreams that were not yet fulfilled.
And if there’s anything to take away from this …it’s the reminder life is very fragile. Our time here is limited and it is precious. And what matters at the end of the day is not the small things, it’s not the trivial things, which so often consume us and our daily lives. Ultimately, it’s how we choose to treat one another and how we love one another.
It’s what we do on a daily basis to give our lives meaning and to give our lives purpose. That’s what matters. At the end of the day, what we’ll remember will be those we loved and what we did for others. That’s why we’re here.)) - President Obama 🔥 🔥
Amen & Amen ❤
I believe in universal human rights and I loved this video. Hopefully, in the future, more countries will accept this idea, and that more people will live peacefully irrespective of personal differences.
You need to read more and not just take what you hear for granted. Universal human rights are an outdated idea, held up by literal globalists.
Human rights are imaginary, not part of your genes. Just like you don't have a soul, you don't have any rights, either. There is no magical forcefield of "rights" protecting you and your rights from being violated. Not by nature, not by people. You have to do that yourself, or enter into a collective nation with other people, who can protect you and the things you value to be a "right". And when you do one day sit down and try coming up with original ideas, what you think the rights should be in your nation, you will find they are not universal. You will even find that some rights conflict with each other, and that you have to prioritize between them. Good luck on your journey. Hope I dispelled some myths.
@@Google_Censored_Commenter There's an ideologist, and there's a realist. Human rights are an ideal. An ideal of a better world, one that we respect each other. Although your point might be more realistic, it's the ideal we're talking about here.
@@aiosquadron k, it's an ideal I disagree with then. I'm not an idealist. Now what?
@@Google_Censored_Commenter Then it's what you decided. You're not an idealist. It's OK. Not everyone is supposed to be an idealist, and I respect that.
@@aiosquadron Kinda puts wrench in the 'universal' part of universal human rights if a group of people can choose not believe in them and therefore aren't willing to enforce them.
I’m only watching this for homework
I am an English teacher and I gave it as a class assignment
same
Sammmeee
@@romanzemar5166 that is pretty cool. I must watch it but it is pretty good for understanding human rights.
@@lucaambrogio8646 sad boy
The world lacks compassion and altruism.
+Sebanoe altruism in overdose can cause exctintion of a species. Symbiosis is the only solution.
Plus give the man a rod, not fish.
***** If you disagree then send me all your money from now on. I can provide reasons altruistic.
I agree. And infant circumcision is proof of this.
Lies it’s just we arnt convinced to use it
Meanwhile we have these declarations and should impose laws to minimize abuse...
"Human Rights" only exist so long as there are people to acknowledge those rights.
It is a mutually beneficial agreement.
If no one acknowledges your "human rights", it will be as if you never had any to start with.
so are human rights intrinsic to our nature as human? or a social construction?
@@cobyleebrooks Yes
Illuminati maintains those laws nothing stops it
@@cobyleebrooks
A social construction that states that our rights are intrinsic
Human rights are intrinsic to each individual. People can only violate them, not abrogate them.
7 years yet the most relevant video on Human rights
human rights have been created for everyone no matter where we are from, there are organizations that support and control human rights but they are not a law so it is difficult to control that in all countries so that these rights are fulfilled
What is a basic rights is envolving. Well said.
complete bulshit that " right as in rights" is a blaub and simply *Impossible* to focus or define. How can anyone speak of or claim what they cannot define- which -*No-one*?
Man that TED theme song makes me want to cry for some reason. It plays with my emotions
Soy boy
@@emmet2410 did you just unironically call someone a soyboy
Manipulation?
I got here from watching "don't stay in school" the song
Same
Same i think that video is a trigger for this video
Ironic
oml same
same
This is so true I love this video and how it defines human rights so easily
I love Ted talks so much. I like the animation that Ted talks use for better explanation.
Thank you Ted talks. 👍
it’s actually a ted-ed not a ted talk, ted talks are done on stage to an audience.
My ss teacher is the best honestly, I freaking love TedEd and he showed it in class
"ss teacher" really?
@@VeryProPlayerYesSir1122 lmao
And you still have not the faintest idea what a right is or what rights are, have you?
No shame in that, because no more does anyone else
Culture and education is more important than most people would think. In most Western nations, human rights seem obvious and "objective". But that's only because the concept of human rights mostly developed in the West. So in most other nations, even if they seem "developed" (like in Asia), they have little to no concept of human rights, due to lack of education about human rights, as well as lack of historical cultural context of having human rights.
Why is the definition of human rights from "western" nations the correct one?
Majin Brock Blanco 0,000001 por ciento what is the non western definition of human rights? Oh yeah that’s right, there isn’t one because they don’t have a concept of human rights.
Good talks. Wordwide "...an equal standard of human rights must be recognized and adopted. In the estimation of God all men are equal; there is no distinction or preferment for any soul in the dominion of His justice and equity." ~ Baha'i Faith
Digital Personality is a very important Human right. However the existing Carta was not efficent, but it has done a great job. The past was full of discussions about this carta. This by his own made the difference. Not many will remember their thoughts about this carta, but they do not even have to. It was a gohst hidden among us. Make it 31 know there is one, too.
I choose to do good to human beings. Sorry for past bad. Believe in equality of people.
Just awesome! I wonder if I can get the script of this video so that I can use it with my students here in Brazil. Thanks in advance.
Conseguiu usar o roteiro?
An important video. Many people should see this.
The only individual rights a person has are any rights they themselves can enforce. If an individual can't enforce a given right by themselves and needs someone else, or some group, to enforce that right, it is no longer a right and is a privilege bestowed by that enforcement group. The pitch of universal human rights, is a pitch for a universal one world government. A government that can give you everything you want is a government that can take everything from you. If you want to truly give people rights, you must give them individually the power to enforce those rights themselves. This is why the 2nd amendment of the constitution in the United States of America is so debated and such a hot topic. On one hand people need arms to enforce their rights from criminal individuals and criminal governments, but on the other hand everyone having arms now has the power to end some one else right to life. Honestly, I personally think the idea of rights is just that, an idea, and in practice, in the real world, is nothing but legal fiction.
Clint i'm a alien
And what made me watch the whole video was it's creative animation!!
And you still don't have the faintest idea what a right is, do you?
No shame in that, no more does anyone else?
It is really disappointing to find out how so many people find themselves in positions of influence and use their power in an unfair and abusive way. Personally I don't think anyone should be in any position where they can get away with ignoring or blocking someone else's basic rights- whether it be a parent, a teacher, a local politician, a top-ranking government employee, etc. There are plenty of dysfunctions that are propagated by such forms of undue discrimination.
Well said.
this is one of the best videos so far, i really enjoy TED-Ed it informs me and gives me small slises of life that i do enjoy so much.
over all this is a grate chanel.
the importance of the standardization of democracy in the relation of the freedoms and the equities of the people, so as not to commit the mistakes of the past. It is the need of the UN, but of the freedom of nations.
Any career advice for someone who is a college senior in an unrelated major who didn't realize she was into international studies until her junior year? It is now my minor and I currently work at a small NGO, albeit as a graphic designer. I love what I do but interested in any thoughts on non-traditional entryways into working with or towards human rights.
When it comes to "Human Rights" I think of them as something that can be applied to the earliest humans. You have the right to speak and live in freedom, to defend yourself, practice your religious beliefs. You don't have the right to harm or restrict other's freedoms; you relinquish your rights when you trample another's.
When people like to say housing or healthcare is a human right, that's where I start having issues. Yes, you have the right to build or buy housing for yourself, but you don't have the right to enforce someone to provide goods or services to you. Digital rights get a little murky with my ideal outlines of human rights, but I believe everyone has the right to privacy. However privacy is interpreted is up to the law makers but we should all agree that doxing of any kind should be illegal.
Eleanor Roosevelt, first US delegate to the United Nations.. she was pretty amazing all around. I don't think FDR could have served 4 successful terms of presidency without her.
8 years and I'm still doing my homework
Rather than ask what universal human rights should cover, it should first be questioned whether or not such things as rights actually exist, or whether we merely hold licences.
For a right to be a right, it must be intrinsic and inalienable, yet when we talk about existing 'rights', all can, in certain circumstances, be alienated; for example, the right to life: certain States can end your life if you commit a certain offence, or your life may legitimately be taken from you by another private individual if acting in self-defence.
As such, is it truly possible to argue that we all have a set of universal human rights, or do we instead only have a set of licences to life, free-speech, movement etc, that can be revoked in certain situations?
*****
I'm not sure what that means.
The point is that I don't understand you? What's the point in that?
Clint Not sure I agree or fully understand what you're trying to say but a tyrant is a bad man in the eyes of the oppressed and any decent human being with a moral compass. I don't think you needed to blather on with nonsense.
You speak of morality, but how can one prove there are any moral truths at all? Demonstrate one. Let me see it with my eyes. Of course you think this is but "blathering nonsense." Morals are not to be seen or touched, but intuited through the "mind," or to put it less euphemistically, through the spirit! Morals are themselves spirits. And like all spiritual things they are figments of the imagination - lies, falsehoods, spooks. All morals were invented by particular people and groups to procure their own power. One who's power is secure need not be a "decent human being." Why should he? For fear of going to hell? There's no such thing. For fear of karma? Again, another lie. For fear of conscience? Only if he's possessed by one.
Many "freethinkers" renounce a moral or two, but with great difficulty the conception “morality.” Morality is the “idea” of morals, their intellectual power, their power over the conscience; on the other hand, specific morals are too material to rule the mind, and do not fetter an “intellectual” man, a so-called “freethinker.” How easily they overcome "the sins of the flesh" and "the duty to one's nation." But morality in general rules many of these so-called "atheists"; for it, much like the Nation and the Truth, has been set upon the throne of the dead god.
He who has power has "right."
If you've followed me this far you might now say, "Wait! The morality I espoused, the rights I stood for, they were my means of acquiring power. Even more, they WERE my power! Yet you seek to take these from me." I do, if your empowerment is incompatible with my own, which is the case with those who's interests are secured through humanism and nationalism alike. Further, there exist no moralities which may procure power for myself and those close to me. The left wing manicheisms of today are at best under-powered weapons against the most virulent threats to my interest.
Clint morality is where we leave our caves, become neighbours and farm the land. Is where a community, rather than a tribe, is built. It changes as our communities change. It serves us, we do not serve morality, but we can make excuses adressing morality. Morality was before the Law, and it is possibly stronger. You can look up the play "Antigone" by Sophocles.
The right correctly is a different thing; it is power.
The interest is not a right, but the will behind the acquisition and exercise of a right.
Practically, there are many different ways of getting your right exercised, depending on your status in your community.
Thanks for just putting up with me. Just my thoughts.
Thank you for this!! a really interesting way to explain human rights, well done.
I have heard the human rights laws thousands of time , but this has only become a humanitarian and repetitive slogan! ❤️🙏🏻⭐️💯✌🏼🦅
I just done this for my online class I'm handing it in right now
*When you have this as homework and it says your suppose to do it your self but your not bothered to lol*
you are absolutely right zach
Nice Video Sister जी (teacher ji) आपको प्रणाम 🙏🙏!! आपके Respected Parents के चरणों में कोटि कोटि प्रणाम 🙏🙏ओर आदर सत्कार 🙏🙏!!
Is an international document that states basic rights and fundamental freedoms to which all human beings are entitledand fundamental freedoms to which all human beings are entitled.
And no explanation is ever given as to why people are entitled to basic rights and fundamental freedoms. Human Right's are a meme
In recent events I've had my Human Rights violated in multiple ways including unfair pay, unreasonable actions taken against my freedom, including wrongful imprisonment. Obstruction of peace by "peace officers" aka APD and RPD. Almost as more of a bargaining/extortion strategy to achieve cooperation in personal conduct, that was in no way affecting them directly in accordance with the law. They would follow me home and this got to the point of APD moving across the street from me and taunting me using my schedule and natural movement (my tendency to leave home or go outside) to taunt me. Then progressed to the places (Home Depot, Frontier restaurant) I was visiting as having security profile me and make unfair judgement on my character. This to be summed up by enforcement waiting outside of my workplace and down my street with a red light on and stalking me. Thanks Michelle Lujan. P.S. I was doing nothing in-just.
Ted-Ed Can you please do a video on the freedom of assemble
What I most agree with in this presentation is that "human rights" is (just) an idea. Just because many of us value it doesn't mean it's objectively or universally true. From a survey of history and nations' government systems, it should be obvious human rights ARE privileges and they CAN be revoked. Governments do it all the time--both to their own citizens and to foreign citizens. The reason "it" gets incredibly complicated as soon as anyone tries to put the idea into practice is because, as with many human concepts, the idea is incompatible with the physical nature. Nature is not "just" or "fair" and has no obligation to mold the universe to satisfy human wants. All human beings are NOT born equal in dignity and rights because "dignity" is merely a perspective and rights, if they were naturally occurring and universal, like gravity, wouldn't need laws to enforce them.
Videos, like this one, that argue some abstract human conception is true outside of some people's desires are the main reason I've stopped watching/listening to TED Talks. Please just stick to what the best hard, international evidence shows to be true--not just what feels good or sounds good.
Your half right. The reason human rights are non existence because humans are now non existent!
It's self-defeating for human rights defenders to start off by the premise that it's all just a social invention.
I think that there DEFINITELY should be a right to digital privacy.
Yes. Especially since nowadays we've been on electronics more.
@@quin340
You're so right.
👍
Agreed
"Rights aren’t rights if someone can take ’em away. They’re privileges, that’s all we’ve ever had" GC
WHO can "take your rights away"?
Someone that can imprison you or take your life.
@@yvonnemariane2265 J572,x9りはりぬかxka/7りねX55にやにyJ.9にLa95:55りにかu55仁奈😁りなx9599/り-9りなやりにu/52ねN52わに/なJ5にjbkpj/な j9652,xjj.95552222わらひかなや?wxj:,,9、xj5955りにたあyJ955544ひなやnJ9:リナかななかたかx5-りなja¥99,:りに-xjk,-x,95？るなxl95555りにxk555555にj-なかなmja56/ *にぬk.6525555ぬたあなたなjajb55755な:、,09/558わりねに,xK,9555るぬyjxJ95555るかにy2a9542りkaj55:5るぬかるかyjb9552るにあかりゃxlxk95/5りなかちなx95:るも9955:にがjaJ55もqp5555/5なあきぬかまjaj92なやなにka755555なj525に-woJ05585わりなか-W09950995わらりxaj52なあl552jpk5252なきja/
*まK5/15ななp0
@@OleStephens Hi I just noticed your reply.. yes the strong-arm... But the universal rights are nice because they remind us that we still have the rights,, it's just that they are sometimes *violated*
That is why the only rights you have are inalienable
What a beautiful and meaningful video
Chi qui nel 2021 ?
Chi qui per la lezione del Pose?
Is there a poster available from this animation? I like the way the rights are presented in squares with some illustrations.
Yup, definetely a right ro access the internet
You said it brotha😉
The access to internet: yes, the actual internet package: no
wrong answer
I used to think i had seen all Ted ed videos! This is amazing💜
Rights are what make people's lives so essential as freedom, life, justice among many others and that around the world has become vulnerable because of selfishness and power.
Very good and informative video. Every person should know their rights
The universal declaration of human rights should be within the constitution of all states and should be the enforceable basis for all international law.
That’s just what I think
I also think some of the rights as stated in the current declaration should be edited to remove vague and persisting ambiguities and establish a more focused and concise consensus on what is acceptable and justified under human rights law and human rights protections.
Then I'd assume you're a naive child
Funny. I wrote a 5 page research paper on this exact topic last year.
Funny. 5 years after your comment, I just finished a 5 page assignment on this exact same topic
@@ou6775 Funny. 5 years after this comment, I will have just finished a 5 page assignment after slaughtering 5 pigs in 5 different slaughterhouses on 5 different days. Insane.
Five gives me 50 million billion gazillion that at no point in that essay do you set out a clear definition of either rights or a right, because you cannot possibly even begin to define a right without reference to cognates or synonyms or descriptions, can you?
No shame in that, no more can anyone else even begin to define a right
UN: does nothing about atrocities in Sri Lanka and turns a blind eye, pulls all the stops because someone was criticised on the internet.
I'm here for homework XD
Me 2
At 3:33, What is the difference between these two rights.
note how at 3:28 the red line shows a border between Canada and the US but not between the ~12 European countries. This is how America views the world :)
I wish I could leave my country, Yemen, to a country that makes me feel safe and I can sleep in it without being afraid of the sound of planes and missiles
I wish someone would feel my pain and fear
How afraid I am that all my ambitions will end in ruins
1:45 I don't really understand how does it work "freedom of movement" for countries that have prisons. Can anyone tell me please?
You are thrown in prison when you have commited a felony, thereby making you a felon. Felons have some rights, but not all of them. I don't agree with that, but hey, it's the answer to your question
This right doesn't really apply to those who have committed an inhuman (federal) crime. They ought to specify that.
@@firebow2810 Though does that not defeat the universality of said rights?
@@redchan2571 rights can be denied to people if there's a valid reason. One of those reasons is when someone can be a danger to the community and needs rehabilitation. There are exceptions for everything in the world
@@firebow2810 that is quite a dangerous stand to take if someone believes that such values are important though, governments in many countries has use the threat to their national security to deny some people human rights whether justified or not. More importantly is the fact that there are no international standards on what is "a threat" and should be locked up, thus theoretically this line of reasoning can apply to almost any action.
8 years later and we still use this for school work🤔
The universal human rights are fundamental for people, the las and norms are set for coexistence in a meeting of countries where the fundamental thing is justice and respecto for the differences of customs and religions.
*1:03** That isn't the Spanish flag, it was the national flag between 1843-1873 and 1874-1931 xD*
2019(G) “Respect and dignity.” Furthermore:
0:58 how ironic
Beni Habibi why?
@@agustinmaldonado8938 Because the United Nations makes a mockery of Human rights.
@@snakey934Snakeybakey how?
@@Gadget-Walkmen appointing Saudi Arabia as head of the comitte for international protection of women's rights, allowing countries like China to dictate policy, allowing former Nazis like Kurt Waldheim to pass condemnations against Israel, scheduling dictators like Ghadaffi to win human rights awards, etc.
@@snakey934Snakeybakey to be fair China is it’s own country and unless the UN want war, China wouldn’t just obey any rule from an outside force so of course it’s own policy.
2019(G) “Respect and dignity.” Furthermore:
Which are no more than meaningless generalisations or vague woolly dreams which you cannot even begin to define because they were never in focus in the first place
Group rights vs. individual rights is very relevant during this pandemic.
I wish everyone in the world could watch this video - it’s so important and sometimes we forget that everyone has these rights.. which is so dangerous ⛔️
I don't believe in human rights
@@Mr_Mistahi don't believe you exist
"The idea of human rights..." That is all that it is. It is an idea. It is something that remains inside the mind and when practiced can be apart of a REAL experience. Like a human shooting another human because they didn't have the "right" to do something. There are no differences between believing in human rights and santa claus. You can and will never actually see either of them. The children of course will believe in him when they see presents under the tree, just like we will believe in "rights", when someone threatens our life if we don't properly practice our non existent, imaginary friends we call rights. Please people wake up. We are fighting and killing over things that do not even exist.
Human rights are simple when viewed in the classically liberal context in which they were first recognized. It's only governments who secretly oppose them and try to subvert them that it gets complicated. Rights become applied to groups, even though by definition they must apply only to individuals (and any other way is tyrannical and oppressive). In the 1930s the progressive/fascist movement via FDR championed freedoms "from" things, which were just excuses for immoral and tyrannical control over individuals. Freedom cannot ever be "from" something; freedom can only be "to do" something. Freedom to speak. Freedom to think. Freedom to defend oneself. It's sick and perverse to create false freedoms from hunger, war, etc merely as a flimsy pretext to enslave people in big government tyranny. This is probably the single most hateful thing one human being can ever do to another, in fact.
I need to ask you a question. Do you have the right to have your rights enforced? Do you have the 'freedom from' having your 'freedoms to' violated? If someone is able to stop you from practicing your 'freedom to', do you have the right to be protected from them?
Who else is here in 2020 when school is on during COVID-19 doing this for home work
If you are writing notes from the video chat you can make part of the process shorter by putting it on X2 speed.
7 years later and this still gets sent out to all year 9 students for core test revision
So how exactly is there a general bias in UDHR to favor civil political liberties over social political rights. Aren't they both the same thing?
RE online learning club :)
great work! thank you!
The universal human rights are those that allow us to express freely regardless of religion, status or skin color.
Good Day!! May i use this video for our Final Performance Task in Empowerment Technology (School Related)?
Outstanding,👍
Who's here in 2024 for homework?
Me Georgia new school
Me! I'm concerned for this
I cant be the only one here from the dont stay in school rap video.
I didnt know we had human rights
This is what I really want to learn.
Fun fact: I'm Italian and I was watching a video about the human rights in Italian for online class when I clicked this
Internet access is not a human right. It costs money to lay cable, make computers, and provide service. No one can claim the right to force other people to pay for those things just b/c they want to watch cat videos on TH-cam.
+Kilk Nil I believe education is a right
+Kilk Nil I believe education is a right
+Kilk Nil I believe education is a right
+Kilk Nil I believe education is a right.
+Naveen I think you missed the point slightly. Having internet as a right doesn't necesarrily mean that Governments will have to provide free access to it, but at least not block it, like it happens in some countries. Obviously it depends on how it will be written.