I donno why people dont notice Alfa Romeo...Alfa Romeo actually built for the fastest and performance. They focus the car that people can feel one on one with the road and the engine... you never know till u have owned it. Trust me!
The 4c arguably didn't succeed because it was too expensive and had to compete against Porsches and Lotuses that were also offered with manual transmissions and really people that buy such cars want manuals. The base price in 2020 was $67,150 or 63.500 Euros, that's a lot of money. The base Alpine is about 57.000 in 2021.
@@MikeGrattan Extra trips to a shop? Please, feel free to provide me with a reliability history for Alpine as a manufacturer... Regardless at the end of the day none of it matters - the 4C is one of the sexiest cars on the road. The Alpine just looks awkward - the front looks like an attempt to go retro sports car, while the rear just looks like any random generic family car, and the whole things fits together rather awkwardly. The car shows no indication of having any character or soul - just bland from head to toe. You can disagree all you like, but I'd take the Alfa all day, every day.
As a daily i would pick the Alpine A110 or a Cayman GT4, but for the weekend which is realistically when i would use a 2 seater, the 4C is the thing. The 4C sounds savage!
I remember when I was still in training and every day on my way to work I saw a white Alpine A110 because its owner lived there. Every day I turned my head to see as much of it as possible. It was my absolute dream car, I studied it and bought books. When I later saw a sales sign in it (14.000 DM -> 7.000EUR), I was torn up, because I simply could not afford it. Many years have passed since then. A few years ago I happened to see a 4C on the highway and something similar to the A110 happened. It blew me away. In January 2020 the time had come and I bought an Alfa 4C. For me the car has similar genes as the old A110, incredibly raw and beautiful. And it's true, it is like a wild dog that will bite you if you are not careful. Please look for reviews of it, the most common attributes are "...so much character..." . Just what I have always been looking for. If you try to put such a car into a "reasonable" category, it will fail. The interpretation of the old Alpine shocks me. In my eyes it has nothing independent, rebellious, I find that a pity. I wonder what the designers thought while drawing. It seems that they want to implement a little bit of everything what is currently out there (Porsche, Audi, Lotus...). I have no idea. Purely in terms of driving performance there are hardly any differences, the interior of the Alpine is more contemporary, but I don't care about that. I have arrived and I am very happy. Should Alpine publish a similar rebellious incarnation of the old Alpine, I will be the one to find out about it. In my eyes the 4C currently offers more attributes I once saw in an Alpine A110 than its actual successor. Whatever. There is no better car as there is no better girl, no better food or better hobby. We should be happy that different car manufacturers provide us with such nice options.
@@Anttihii Alfa doesn't win in driving. It is very slightly faster but Alpine handles way better, better balance too, and more fun. Also if it were all about performance, then the Cayman eats the 4C alive.
@@Anttihii Alpine was tested faster on Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear... 4C is not faster
Both great cars. But the Alpine is way more practical for road use : light and precise steering , easy to get in and out, narrower and much easier to park , refined interior , valved exhaust so you can actually talk on the phone. Performance whise they pretty on par ( in the video the Alpine drives in 10 c colder temp , less grip ) . The new A110 with 300 hp , especially in the S version, is quite faster than the 4c .
Two of my favorite cars right now and two future classics! Really hard call, i know the Alpine is better in all aspects, but i guess I'll take the Alfa because this is a kind of car that you don't buy with your head but with your heart and the Alfa sounds amazingly raw and brutal.
Alpine is not better in all aspects ,not even close . Alpine has a better sound isolation ,better (softer) suspension for every day driving and regular bumpy roads and a better build inside. On the other hand Alfa is faster ,less hp but more torque ,and almost 200 kg less ,some specs say 200 some say 150 .But it's faster as you can see here .Suspension and chassis are also better for track driving ,alpine is better for everyday but alfa for the track driving ,you can't brat alfas carbon chassis. Also it's a much prettier design ,it's literally like a supercar design ,baby ferrari or mclaren .Alpine is very nice too but 4c just stand out a lot more .And also it sounds better. Guys who designed the ferrari enzo worked on the 4c design a chassis .For me 4c is better because it's faster better for track driving , better sound and design ,all the most important things on a sports car . Alpine is on the other hand better to live with as an everyday car ,and it good to in all other thing but still not as good as 4c.
How can someone who likes cars choose between those 2?? I think they are both excellent little sports cars and we should all be thankful we still have them instead of full electric ones
Not to me. The Alfa is so sexy that I can justify spending that type of money - it actually LOOKS like a supercar. The Alpine looks bland, boring and uneventful - liike like it could just as easily be the next generation VW Scirocco - some random economy hatch turned into fake coupe. I couldn't justify spending the entry price for a car so void of character.
@@pete3198 Well it's a matter of taste i suppose. Because, except for the rear, the alfa doesn't look any good for me. The comparison with the sirroco is a bit silly. Ok u might not like the a110 design but what's the point ?
@@pete3198 "Sexy" is subjective, I don't find it sexy at all. And people do care about spending that kind of money, the 4C is not selling very well, contrary to the Alpine. Finally, comparing the Alpine design to any VW... please
stickygaiden You’re totally right about the Scirocco comparison with the Alpine. But you lost your way when you bashed about the 4C. The 4C was released some years ago and its a marvel of engineering for the price it has. Its a carbon fiber monocoque, light, nimble and a blast to drive specially if you have the skills.
The choice between two would give me a nice headache. Alpine - will out-handle Alfa but probably just a tiny bit slower. Alfa - damn sexy looks and can be without roof too. Alpine - nicer interior, usable everyday (in most cases), Alfa - mostly single-purpose car (doubt you can take it on the trip). Reliability - both questionable, but 4C proved to be quite reliable, Alpine is still unknown (apart windshield cracks). Both might be PITA to repair due to engine mounting. I see 4C, I do heavy breathing meme, I see Alpine and I love it's simplicity, lovely interior, nice looks and rarity.
We need that Alpine here in the US. First time I saw it I thought damn that looks pretty different and would be a ton of fun. NOPE. 4C looks good as well. Just looks like a squashed supercar. LOL. Pull that out a few feet and it would look really good.
@@blademanx We have the Civic Type R. Fake vents, over the top style and 3 exhaust tips. Possibly the ugliest car on the road. So yea. I would drive those over the type R.
Lee Ban you can’t compare a regular Clio or Megane to Alpine. People in the US are open minded, not so conservative as europeen can be. As the Alpine is a very specific and different car, that could be sold in the US, for sure.
Alpine was tested faster on Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear...
Anthony Hauser depends on your length. I’m 1.87m/6.1 foot and I fit just fine. I had people in the car who were taller and they struggled: or the footcompartment on the passengerside is too small or their head touched the inner roof...
@@scottstewart5784 No, you misunderstood, im not saying that's a bad idea, it is a good idea. I meant that u can compare the figures in the video because those cars are comparable.
@@xanthuumnihyr5319 OH! I get it now. Thanks for the info on the cars. I just think we focus on the power so much, i lose track with all the 600 hp this or that. Having the weight would help in comparisons, as would kilos per HP or HP per Kilo.
Cayman718 is well done, A110 is medium well, Alfa 4C is raw. I eat my steak medium well but when it comes to cars RAW is better for me. The 4C is more engaging than the Cayman and A110 even if it’s not on manual transmission
Oscar Dominguez how can it be bad when it’s designed by Borg Wagner, Magnetti Marelli, and FPT. It can shift at 100ms when on race mode. Even if it’s framework was used on Dodge Dart and Giuleta and other Fiat products, some of the parts have been upgraded strictly for the 4C. The reason it can shift faster than the one’s on other cars like the Dodge Dart. It’s what you called using a framework that exist and modify other components strictly for a specific product. Any hardware or software can be tweaked for a specific purpose, the wonders of modular design and engineering.
My rational argument not to buy either A110 or 4C is because I don't have time to drive a 2 seater. I consider myself a rational person but when I test drove the A110 I had a grin that lasted the whole day. So since then i have an angel on each shoulder , one says You don't need one ! and the other says : You only live once, buy both !
Alpine was tested faster on tracks as Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear...
The Alpine is faster is more fun to drive, it's newer, it looks better inside as outside and is practically the same speed, acceleration and sound. This in my opinion, but the common sense says that the Alpine is a better car. It's also a classic.
contrairement aux derniers tests français qui donnent toujours l'alpine devant on vois bien la que la 4c pousse plus fort, après il suffit de regarder son record sur le nurburgring et les vrais tests de zeperfs pour voir que l'alpine annonce un 0 a 100 en 4.5 s comme la 4c alors que c'est plutôt en réel 4.8 s. l'alpine c'est un super retour qui me ravis , mais il faut arrêter de la comparer a la 4c moi qui a la chance de pouvoir conduire les 2 la 4c = plus une lotus en mieux fini et alpine plus confortable plus proche d'une porsche.
The Alfa Romeo is 200kg lighter, less long, larger, smaller, carbon chassis. Can be roadster. It is not a Renault... A future collector, alpine is just an affordable Porsche.
No contest. The Alpine is a wonderfully balanced car entirely enjoyable in all occasion. Stable, composed and comfortable at any speed. Outclass the Alfa in all departments. The is the Alfa, Alfa should have built at the first place. Running costs ? Similar to an average sedan. A supercar in sheep's clothing. Fell in love with it ! My husband has a Porsche but he prefers to drive the Alpine any given day. This car is lovely and quite easy to live with. A lot of fun for the money...
@@dejafastfingersra9661 No way to go for the Alfa. Patchy quality and uncomfortable to drive. Top speed is not the issue. My husband tried both. And came out of the Alpine with a huge smile. He is now using the Alpine as his daily driver. Sometime, less is more...
Less is more? Thats a good reson to buy a skoda...... These cars are made to drive in a sporty way..... To give u shivers down ur spine...... Therefor the alpine has no chance...... As a daily driver...... Ok..... But to thrill.....Nope
@@dejafastfingersra9661 If there is a good reason to buy a Skoda, then buy an Alfa. A Fiat subsidiary. My husband has also a Porsche. He is using it less and less. It gives me the chance to drive it then ! But I prefer the Alpine. More comfy and easy to live with. Fun, fun, fun...that all what matters
🤣🤣🤣Omg.......seems that u like the monolog...... Congrats to your husband for buying these cars....... HE seems to have some money😅😅😅 I think the alpine fits u perfect...... Please dont buy that, full of character, 4c...... Im out✌️✌️✌️
The 4C is so beautiful, that every time you look at it, it makes you forget all its faults.. its curves are art.. and when you drive it, feels like a baby supercar.. the Alpine is nice, especially inside..but 4C is next level. Although the noise of the Alpine from inside, sounds fake to me.
Belle réussite pour l Alpine , jolie look pour l Alfa , dommage de n avoir pas glisser une Audi TTs avec 306 cv au prix comparable , et avec certainement une finition supérieure , en qualité des matériaux, que seul Audi a toujours su faire.
Alpine was tested faster on Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear
Ferrari Got switches from Fiat uno before, where is the Problem? Think about that you get still Parts for that cause that part was sold more than 10000 times
Also 4c is not faster ...Alpine was tested faster on Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear...
I'd take my mildly modified Supercharged Lotus Elise over these two everyday. Manuel gearbox, manuel everything, an event everytime I drive it. These remind me of my daily driven Suzuki Swift Sport Auto.
Hahahahaaaaaa , unusually quiet dude !!! so which one did you prefer ??? I was actively looking for this comparison on TH-cam and I have come across your channel before and knew yours is better quality than hundreds of wannabes..............................................but you said nothing !!!! Hmmmmm !!!!
I am Italian but Alpine did a wonderful job with the A110. Both cars are amazing (unfortunately I am poor 🤣🤣)
I saw a red 4c parked yesterday and they look lovely in person
Same but the I saw was a launch edition with carbon headlights
I donno why people dont notice Alfa Romeo...Alfa Romeo actually built for the fastest and performance. They focus the car that people can feel one on one with the road and the engine... you never know till u have owned it. Trust me!
Don Shafiq yeah but from what i heard the 4c is very disapointing.
@@vedeved5246
There's always one or another reviewer that didn't like the 4C, go and try one for yourself if you can, it's a proper weapon.
How is this 4C in rain? the car looks awesome and is very fast... but some people complaing about driving hard in rain? anyone?
The 4c arguably didn't succeed because it was too expensive and had to compete against Porsches and Lotuses that were also offered with manual transmissions and really people that buy such cars want manuals. The base price in 2020 was $67,150 or 63.500 Euros, that's a lot of money. The base Alpine is about 57.000 in 2021.
Both cars are wonderful, but the Alfa has that little extra something
...yes; extra road noise, extra wind noise, extra hole in the steering column for the key, extra trips to the shop. Lots of extra somethings!
@@MikeGrattan What a jackwagon. Wow.
@@thomasferrarojr.9772 Excuse me....I was critiquing Alfa, not slinging ad hominem attacks at people like you just did. Chill out.
@@MikeGrattan
Extra trips to a shop? Please, feel free to provide me with a reliability history for Alpine as a manufacturer...
Regardless at the end of the day none of it matters - the 4C is one of the sexiest cars on the road. The Alpine just looks awkward - the front looks like an attempt to go retro sports car, while the rear just looks like any random generic family car, and the whole things fits together rather awkwardly. The car shows no indication of having any character or soul - just bland from head to toe.
You can disagree all you like, but I'd take the Alfa all day, every day.
@ Michael Grattan go sit on daddy’s lap
While I think the Alpine A110 is a veritable triumph, I just love the sweet noises the Alfa 4C makes even more! The 4C is also a beauty to boot!
I think the same.
The Alpine is better, but the Alfa sound so great and raw, and just feels so much special.
As a daily i would pick the Alpine A110 or a Cayman GT4, but for the weekend which is realistically when i would use a 2 seater, the 4C is the thing.
The 4C sounds savage!
I remember when I was still in training and every day on my way to work I saw a white Alpine A110 because its owner lived there. Every day I turned my head to see as much of it as possible. It was my absolute dream car, I studied it and bought books. When I later saw a sales sign in it (14.000 DM -> 7.000EUR), I was torn up, because I simply could not afford it. Many years have passed since then. A few years ago I happened to see a 4C on the highway and something similar to the A110 happened. It blew me away. In January 2020 the time had come and I bought an Alfa 4C. For me the car has similar genes as the old A110, incredibly raw and beautiful. And it's true, it is like a wild dog that will bite you if you are not careful. Please look for reviews of it, the most common attributes are "...so much character..." . Just what I have always been looking for. If you try to put such a car into a "reasonable" category, it will fail. The interpretation of the old Alpine shocks me. In my eyes it has nothing independent, rebellious, I find that a pity. I wonder what the designers thought while drawing. It seems that they want to implement a little bit of everything what is currently out there (Porsche, Audi, Lotus...). I have no idea. Purely in terms of driving performance there are hardly any differences, the interior of the Alpine is more contemporary, but I don't care about that. I have arrived and I am very happy. Should Alpine publish a similar rebellious incarnation of the old Alpine, I will be the one to find out about it. In my eyes the 4C currently offers more attributes I once saw in an Alpine A110 than its actual successor. Whatever. There is no better car as there is no better girl, no better food or better hobby. We should be happy that different car manufacturers provide us with such nice options.
My 4C came with an Alpine Radio so I have that going for me!
lol
Enzo954 haha, indeed.
Both cars are incredible.
Both looks beautiful but the interior of the Alpine looks way better while the alfa sounds better.
Exactly!! IMO The Alpine also looks better from the outside
this isnt about interior this is for driving and performance and Alfa wins.
@@Anttihii Alfa doesn't win in driving. It is very slightly faster but Alpine handles way better, better balance too, and more fun.
Also if it were all about performance, then the Cayman eats the 4C alive.
@@Anttihii Alpine was tested faster on Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear... 4C is not faster
@@alui92 nothing looks better than 4C outside.Nothing
Both great cars. But the Alpine is way more practical for road use : light and precise steering , easy to get in and out, narrower and much easier to park , refined interior , valved exhaust so you can actually talk on the phone. Performance whise they pretty on par ( in the video the Alpine drives in 10 c colder temp , less grip ) . The new A110 with 300 hp , especially in the S version, is quite faster than the 4c .
Two of my favorite cars right now and two future classics!
Really hard call, i know the Alpine is better in all aspects, but i guess I'll take the Alfa because this is a kind of car that you don't buy with your head but with your heart and the Alfa sounds amazingly raw and brutal.
Alpine is not better in all aspects ,not even close . Alpine has a better sound isolation ,better (softer) suspension for every day driving and regular bumpy roads and a better build inside.
On the other hand Alfa is faster ,less hp but more torque ,and almost 200 kg less ,some specs say 200 some say 150 .But it's faster as you can see here .Suspension and chassis are also better for track driving ,alpine is better for everyday but alfa for the track driving ,you can't brat alfas carbon chassis.
Also it's a much prettier design ,it's literally like a supercar design ,baby ferrari or mclaren .Alpine is very nice too but 4c just stand out a lot more .And also it sounds better.
Guys who designed the ferrari enzo worked on the 4c design a chassis .For me 4c is better because it's faster better for track driving , better sound and design ,all the most important things on a sports car .
Alpine is on the other hand better to live with as an everyday car ,and it good to in all other thing but still not as good as 4c.
The 4C is a lot less insulated you can hear on the autobahn 😅 still would take the Alfa
It has like thinner windows and stuff to make it lighter
Alpine gets my vote. 4C looks beautiful though.
For me alfa romeo please
Two incredible cars. It's a pity they don't sell it in Brazil.
Tamo junto kkkk
The sound of the Alfa is was more brutal than that one of the alpine
but fucking wheelspin in launchcontrol
Savage Mode there was no wheelspin
Alpine, not Alpina
jizz us thx
@@jonastheil9572 you're welcome ! Alpina develops high perf versions of BMW cars
How can someone who likes cars choose between those 2??
I think they are both excellent little sports cars and we should all be thankful we still have them instead of full electric ones
The fact that the 4C is 10 000+ € more expensive is a win for the alpine.
Not to me. The Alfa is so sexy that I can justify spending that type of money - it actually LOOKS like a supercar.
The Alpine looks bland, boring and uneventful - liike like it could just as easily be the next generation VW Scirocco - some random economy hatch turned into fake coupe. I couldn't justify spending the entry price for a car so void of character.
@@pete3198 Well it's a matter of taste i suppose. Because, except for the rear, the alfa doesn't look any good for me.
The comparison with the sirroco is a bit silly. Ok u might not like the a110 design but what's the point ?
@@pete3198 "Sexy" is subjective, I don't find it sexy at all. And people do care about spending that kind of money, the 4C is not selling very well, contrary to the Alpine.
Finally, comparing the Alpine design to any VW... please
stickygaiden You’re totally right about the Scirocco comparison with the Alpine. But you lost your way when you bashed about the 4C. The 4C was released some years ago and its a marvel of engineering for the price it has. Its a carbon fiber monocoque, light, nimble and a blast to drive specially if you have the skills.
@@fernandofragoso4118 Obvious fanboy is obvious. Cut the crap with the scirrocco.
The choice between two would give me a nice headache. Alpine - will out-handle Alfa but probably just a tiny bit slower. Alfa - damn sexy looks and can be without roof too. Alpine - nicer interior, usable everyday (in most cases), Alfa - mostly single-purpose car (doubt you can take it on the trip). Reliability - both questionable, but 4C proved to be quite reliable, Alpine is still unknown (apart windshield cracks). Both might be PITA to repair due to engine mounting. I see 4C, I do heavy breathing meme, I see Alpine and I love it's simplicity, lovely interior, nice looks and rarity.
A lovely, well put together video. Love the looks of the cars, and you did a great job capturing that
Alfa 😍
For me the Alfa Romeo please.
Another great idea to compare those beautiful both cars!Nice video and nice perfs!
Great comparison! Thanks👍
We need that Alpine here in the US. First time I saw it I thought damn that looks pretty different and would be a ton of fun. NOPE. 4C looks good as well. Just looks like a squashed supercar. LOL. Pull that out a few feet and it would look really good.
Americans wouldnt drive Renault thats why they arent In America. Can you picture yourself driving a Clio or Megane? Lol
@@blademanx We have the Civic Type R. Fake vents, over the top style and 3 exhaust tips. Possibly the ugliest car on the road. So yea. I would drive those over the type R.
Lee Ban you can’t compare a regular Clio or Megane to Alpine. People in the US are open minded, not so conservative as europeen can be. As the Alpine is a very specific and different car, that could be sold in the US, for sure.
Alpine for the interior
Alpine and 4C has beutiful but the 4C has sport dacia interior😂
The alfa is too fast for only 240hp looks like 300 or more
Alfa is good in weight reduction
@@Reddit_shorts_525 both are
Alpine was tested faster on Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear...
4c faster
4C’s Weight is 895kg (with the carbon fiber chassis)
ALFA ROMEO 4C
4C
Veloce Vlogs is the 4c like super small for a man?
Anthony Hauser depends on your length. I’m 1.87m/6.1 foot and I fit just fine. I had people in the car who were taller and they struggled: or the footcompartment on the passengerside is too small or their head touched the inner roof...
Have you gone on any long trips with it at all? If so, is the trunk space really that bad? Would you be able to fit a couple duffle bags in it?
A Tiwana not any really long trips. But the trunk is really small, perhaps one, maybe 2, shopping bags... it’s really insignificant 😂
Big fan of both of these. It would be a tough choice no doubt!
You really should add weight when you post specs
yes! - especially when two cars with similar power specs are being compared
The difference isn't that great here though
@@xanthuumnihyr5319 and it would have been interesting if we ALL knew that during the video.
@@scottstewart5784 No, you misunderstood, im not saying that's a bad idea, it is a good idea.
I meant that u can compare the figures in the video because those cars are comparable.
@@xanthuumnihyr5319 OH! I get it now. Thanks for the info on the cars. I just think we focus on the power so much, i lose track with all the 600 hp this or that. Having the weight would help in comparisons, as would kilos per HP or HP per Kilo.
Like for Alfa 4C.
Did you really use lauch control on a cold engine??
Being an owner of a 4c, one word; scintillating. The Alpine does sound delicious at high speed though.
Cayman718 is well done, A110 is medium well, Alfa 4C is raw. I eat my steak medium well but when it comes to cars RAW is better for me. The 4C is more engaging than the Cayman and A110 even if it’s not on manual transmission
2 supper gaven wagens moeilijk kiezen lijkt me . Welke heeft jou voorkeur en wow factor??
I love the cars you choose.tanks man
1000000 like
Alpine much more efficient on track than 4C ?
Lekker geluid van die Alpine!
Yeah... The 4C wins because of its carbon structure and maybe its wonderful gearbox
Wold OliviO the 4c gearbox is really bad
@@oscardominguez1680 how can you say that ? It's a ferrari's gearbox...
Wold OliviO no it’s not! No ferrari uses this gearbox. It’s slow, jerky and really unresponsive to the paddle shifters.
Oscar Dominguez how can it be bad when it’s designed by Borg Wagner, Magnetti Marelli, and FPT. It can shift at 100ms when on race mode. Even if it’s framework was used on Dodge Dart and Giuleta and other Fiat products, some of the parts have been upgraded strictly for the 4C. The reason it can shift faster than the one’s on other cars like the Dodge Dart. It’s what you called using a framework that exist and modify other components strictly for a specific product. Any hardware or software can be tweaked for a specific purpose, the wonders of modular design and engineering.
@@curvetrcalinga Because they don't know what they're talking about.
Both cars are wonderful, but the Alpine has the little extra someting :)
👌🙌those cars sounds soo good🙌👌
Alfa👍
Pull the right paddle to get 1st from N. Don't need the 1 button.
Italian!!!!
My rational argument not to buy either A110 or 4C is because I don't have time to drive a 2 seater. I consider myself a rational person but when I test drove the A110 I had a grin that lasted the whole day. So since then i have an angel on each shoulder , one says You don't need one ! and the other says : You only live once, buy both !
Alfa romeo 4c Nice car ❤❤❤
I prefer the Alfa Romeo BAT 9 ^_^,
Both nice Alpine & 4C
Alpine was tested faster on tracks as Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear...
Who gives a shit
Μιχαλης Κολλατος everyone who drives that kind of car. So this can’t be your concern, GTFO and drive your moped. 👋 bye bye
Give me 3 pedals and a gear lever any day . Id love the alfa with a gated shifter and no electronic aids.
The 4C sounds better, looks better and it's faster...I bet you can guess which one I would take...
The Alpine is faster is more fun to drive, it's newer, it looks better inside as outside and is practically the same speed, acceleration and sound. This in my opinion, but the common sense says that the Alpine is a better car. It's also a classic.
The 4c only sounds better
@@juliensenft8083 It's personal, I prefer the Alpine sound.
@@wilsonwise Umm...no it's not faster dude. Did you even watch the video? It pulled way ahead. Lmao
@@thomasferrarojr.9772 Faster on track 😉
contrairement aux derniers tests français qui donnent toujours l'alpine devant on vois bien la que la 4c pousse plus fort, après il suffit de regarder son record sur le nurburgring et les vrais tests de zeperfs pour voir que l'alpine annonce un 0 a 100 en 4.5 s comme la 4c alors que c'est plutôt en réel 4.8 s. l'alpine c'est un super retour qui me ravis , mais il faut arrêter de la comparer a la 4c moi qui a la chance de pouvoir conduire les 2 la 4c = plus une lotus en mieux fini et alpine plus confortable plus proche d'une porsche.
i would take ALPINE every day of the week
Gosh that alpine is beautiful, but the Alfa has always been my dream car. But sadly the only one I can afford is the 4c on Forza. 😂
Alfa..✌✌✌✌
The Alfa Romeo is 200kg lighter, less long, larger, smaller, carbon chassis. Can be roadster.
It is not a Renault...
A future collector, alpine is just an affordable Porsche.
Try the other way around for the collector comment...
Both for the line.
Alpine for the interior.
Alfa for the handling, performance and drive feeling.
PS I don t like the tachometer and display of alpine
Glie pisca ntesta la 4c
4c is to a110 as a110 is to cayman. The 4c seems a little more raw, whereas the a110 is more civilized on a day to day.
I would Choose The Alpine Because The Interior !
But From Outside i think the Alfa Wins it Looks more Like a Supersportscar
4C 🤤🤤
No contest. The Alpine is a wonderfully balanced car entirely enjoyable in all occasion. Stable, composed and comfortable at any speed. Outclass the Alfa in all departments. The is the Alfa, Alfa should have built at the first place. Running costs ? Similar to an average sedan. A supercar in sheep's clothing. Fell in love with it ! My husband has a Porsche but he prefers to drive the Alpine any given day. This car is lovely and quite easy to live with. A lot of fun for the money...
Did u watch the video? 4c was faster 0 to 200.
Could it be that u r a renault dealer with a alfa garage near by? 😂😂😂😂
@@dejafastfingersra9661 No way to go for the Alfa. Patchy quality and uncomfortable to drive. Top speed is not the issue. My husband tried both. And came out of the Alpine with a huge smile. He is now using the Alpine as his daily driver. Sometime, less is more...
Less is more? Thats a good reson to buy a skoda...... These cars are made to drive in a sporty way..... To give u shivers down ur spine...... Therefor the alpine has no chance...... As a daily driver...... Ok..... But to thrill.....Nope
@@dejafastfingersra9661 If there is a good reason to buy a Skoda, then buy an Alfa. A Fiat subsidiary. My husband has also a Porsche. He is using it less and less. It gives me the chance to drive it then ! But I prefer the Alpine. More comfy and easy to live with. Fun, fun, fun...that all what matters
🤣🤣🤣Omg.......seems that u like the monolog......
Congrats to your husband for buying these cars....... HE seems to have some money😅😅😅
I think the alpine fits u perfect...... Please dont buy that, full of character, 4c...... Im out✌️✌️✌️
The 4C is so beautiful, that every time you look at it, it makes you forget all its faults.. its curves are art.. and when you drive it, feels like a baby supercar..
the Alpine is nice, especially inside..but 4C is next level.
Although the noise of the Alpine from inside, sounds fake to me.
4C😍
Belle réussite pour l Alpine , jolie look pour l Alfa , dommage de n avoir pas glisser une Audi TTs avec 306 cv au prix comparable , et avec certainement une finition supérieure , en qualité des matériaux, que seul Audi a toujours su faire.
Rr wraith pov night drive with starlight headliner
For me the Alfa please.
Alfa win ...
Alpine by far for me !
Forza alfa.
Alpine ♡
the noise in the Alfa on the autobahn is horrible
Why is the Alfa so expensive?
Superlightweight carbon chassis and shit like that
@@prickowens9341 carbon fiber transmission, aluminum engine and pay for Maserati to manufacture it
Hand built by Maserati and full carbon tub. Find another car with the same and it will be a Ferrari, Mclaren or similar. It's cheap... Not expensive.
@@wolf250015 All petrol engines are made out of aluminium.
@@Abarthgo For 70 000€, it's expensive.
Alfa > Alpine 😄
70 000€ > 56 000€ pretty logical
On track Alpine > Alfa
Alpine was tested faster on Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear
It ‘s how you get there
alfa 4c !!!!!
Alpine for me
The Alpine is the better car for sure. But i will take the Alfa as it just appeals to you emotionally.
Conclusion 4C faster. But I already knew that lol
ALPINE ❤️❤️❤️
Alpine has Clio Mk 4 Air vents in the interior 😁
Oh really ?
The ones from the alfa come from a punto... It's not better !!
Ferrari Got switches from Fiat uno before, where is the Problem? Think about that you get still Parts for that cause that part was sold more than 10000 times
Per Nielsen
So don’t buy a car , just air vent 🙄
lol 4c low hp a faster nice
Look weight
Way more torque....
Also 4c is not faster ...Alpine was tested faster on Top Gear, Nuburgring, Magny Cours, Contidorm, Le Mans, Sachensring, Auto Zeitung... Also it has better reprise 60-100 and 80-120 and 80-160 in 4, 5, 6 and final gear...
Alpine ! 🇫🇷
Alfa Romeo 4c
🔥
I will keep my 4C and get the Alpine for my girlfriend. Win Win
I would take the alpine π~π
ALPINE ! 💪
Alpine sale 299 car in France for may , Alfa Romeo with 4 models sale 289 cars ....... 😂😂😂
I'd take my mildly modified Supercharged Lotus Elise over these two everyday. Manuel gearbox, manuel everything, an event everytime I drive it. These remind me of my daily driven Suzuki Swift Sport Auto.
alfa need to make e newer version its clear its an old design alpine inside much betterbut i ould stiill buy the alfa lol
4c wins in everyway
Simo C doesn’t win at all.
🍀💪
Hahahahaaaaaa , unusually quiet dude !!! so which one did you prefer ??? I was actively looking for this comparison on TH-cam and I have come across your channel before and knew yours is better quality than hundreds of wannabes..............................................but you said nothing !!!! Hmmmmm !!!!
Alpine
Alfa ❤️
The Alpine in much cheaper but has a simular performance and looks better in my opinion so i would buy the A110
Alfa is better in all
Srsly ??
LOL ... worst in all, except the noise.
But faster
Alfa Romeo 👍
Non c'è proprio paragone , l'Alfa è di ben altra fattura...
I dont understand you, you wrote something and your Pic is an Alfa, so it must be something good about it 😅