MALLIKARJUN KODAGALI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA (2019, SC) (RIGHT OF THE VICTIM TO FILE AN APPEAL)

[@a.psingh5683]

Excellent

[@sunilvisvkarma]

Very informative ... superb

[@Basicslaw]

Thank you sir. The way you explain each aspect is commendable.

[@sukhirai5077]

Very well explained

[@sanjeevsahu777]

Beautifully explained

[@kushankchhabra3697]

sir can you also explain what changes have occured in rights of victiom after case of jagjeet singh v. ashish mishra

[@rudragupta6131]

Sir when victim appeals when state does not appeal then also case is proceeded by public prosecutor ?

[@rohitjoshi7433]

Thank you so much.....
🙏

[@123arpittyagi2]

Wonderful lecture sir.
You missed whether 378(3) and (4) anomaly in the sense that when an accused is complainant himself and when case in instituted on 173(2) crpc, why in former situations victim needs special leave to appeal but not in latter.
Plz discuss it

[@123arpittyagi2]

Thus it is in violation of Article 14 and logic as law treats victim cumbersumly who takes burden in instituting complaint and thereby benefit of 378proviso not extended to him