What he’s really saying is what you call your life is made of the exact same substance as your dreams. It’s just a different frequency. All you can ever experience are frequencies 🤷♂️
@@simonfernandes6809 What is a near death experience actually? Either you're dead or you're not. If I told you I had a near Hawaiian experience but never actually went to Hawaii but instead went to Disney Land would you consider the trip to Disney Land as actually going to Hawaii? And why are all so called near death experiences different? Some have a Jesus experience, some have a new age experience, some have a "It's all a simulation and we're all here to learn experience." I'll tell you why. They were all in a dream state brought on by the body releasing DMT.
The whole thing that we have wrong, in our approach to understanding Reality, is where we think it is that Reality is taking place. There is no outside universe from the point of view of the experiencer. This whole thing is us.
This. But personally I think it has to be the case that we (or 99 percent of people) don't see the whole thing. It is designed that way. So we can fully experience this illusion. The people who get it accidentally noticed a mistake in the matrix.
From the highest perspective there is no where and when. There is only "being", "existing". But that's breaks all our schemes which are based on space-time, precisely limited to that environment (space -time) so that we can play the game of life experience
@@yeeeehaaawbuddy I don't agree with you here. It's said that the upper layers (or dimensions) of reality have access and knowledge of the lower layers but not the opposite.
Entheogens re-arrange sensory management systems. Human perceptions, no matter what influences them, are human perceptions. Choosing to congratulate ourselves that we’ve broken the Big Code is merely hubris. Human hubris. We don’t know what we don’t know. We don’t know what the limits of knowing involve. The mirror doesn’t pass its own judgement on the image it reflects.
"That (the Invisible-Absolute) is whole; whole is this (the visible phenomenal); from the Invisible Whole comes forth the visible whole. Though the visible whole has come out from that Invisible Whole, yet the Whole remains unaltered." - Upanishads
Bht the BIG question....what will happen first, will Grand Theft Auto 6 come out first? Or will we discover a unified theory of physics first?.. Personally Im hoping for GTA6 to come out first
This is a dialogue about knowing. Truth is a purity measure, not a matter of understanding. Things can be true that are not accessible to senses. Senses do not measure truth, they measure data. Truth is an idea, data is information. There is no argument to be made that “we need to watch the supercomputer” or not. The theorem that “Truth = Success” is unproven.
The young man asked the wise old monk, "How should I treat other people?" And the monk answered, "There are no 'other' people." There’s a possibility, that my mind is wired up to a “computer interactive simulation.”
Sure, but what the monk probably meant was that we are all unified, not separate, and that we should treat others as if they were ourselves. Not that we all exist in a computer simulation.
Then, that means the simulation is working fine. We are all confused at least partially and it is said that the next step is the awakening (knowing ur essence which controls the interface)
dreams were more real to me as a kids under 6. then you learn to count to 100 and we worship numbers: time, money, etc. Now at 49, my dreams are beginning to feel just as real, if not more real than waking life.
This makes alot of sense. So reality is simulating itself. But what is our purpose. How can we help reality realise and define itself? How do we know if we have reached a point in which we have enough purposeful intent to say we have a free will? Or are there no defined steps/ is there no end to this path?
The purpose is to know Almighty God, He created mankind to test them . the Qur'an explains it. Google/TH-cam the works of Ahmed Hulusi Turkish Sufi Spiritual master .
The purpose is knowing ourselves through experiencing life interactions. But at the end we all are one Thing, the whole, so u and me (and everything existing) are parts of the we hole which is experiencing itself through all this these parts interactions
You have free will from the first moment. Actually free will is the motor which triggered this "simulation". The whole "wants" to know itself so so interacts with itself through its parts (we and any being or thing existing)
I understand. I know we are all part of the whole. Which is magnificent and somehow scary at the same time. What i still do not understand, is for example, if free will is what started this, so it is a "core" part of reality, how is it, that sometimes in my life i knew what i wanted to do, but could not actually do it and gave in to addiction instead. Of course i learned, i became better and became stronger to give up addictions, but in so many moments of my life it felt like i could not actually make a decision. If i act reactive to someone insulting me for example, do i have a free will, if i did not actually decide to get angry or sad?
@@Martin-yv7pr According to some spiritual traditions, the human being is formed by different bodies. The lower (physical , material) body is related or conditioned by the ego (education, cultural environment, traumas, beliefs, etc); upper bodies are free of the ego so more triggered by free will than reactive to conditions. Discovering that ur essence is the upper bodies (consciousness, soul, mental continuum in Buddhism, etc) is what is called awakening or enlightenment and is what makes u free from being reactive and suffering. This usually is a process through study, meditation,..., but some people had radical experiences which made this process instantaneous. The fact that you are aware of this means you took the first steps but , as I said, it's usually a process.
Because you aren’t a simulation, your form and personhood may be but you, your being, your actuality is reality. Reality doesn’t view itself directly because it is itself, it cannot get outside of itself, only virtually, it can only dream itself basically, it imagines and interprets itself, that’s what you are doing. Truth is the concept of what something actually is, unfiltered, yet all senses are filters, there’s only sound because we have ears, taste because we have tongues, you can use a visualiser on your computer to see music, it’s not any more correct to see it rather than hear it, there’s no “what it really sounds like” or “what it really tastes like”. There’s no need to search for truth because you are it, what you’re looking for is not truth, it’s a satisfying dream, a narrative.
Through awakening or enlightenment. We all shall experience this. Also, the simulation is real as well (the interface you use when playing is real): it's only a small part of the truth but it's truth also
Great. The underlying truth is hidden so we can play the game. This corresponds with all of the old spiritual traditions. Also, it doesn't mean the simulation is not truth (the screen, the headset, the hand controller are real...), it's just they sre only a small part of the truth
Not a simulation. The experiencing apparatus is (i.e. the human nervous system) is hierarchical and evolutionary in its design. For most humans the sophistication or refinement of the apparatus is such that its filtering out much of the phenomenal world yielding a dashboard simplification that is necessary adaptive for survival (that’s the hierarchical aspect of the design). Using Vedic technology of consciousness, the nervous system can refine the functioning of the dashboard to be more and more inclusive of both the phenomenal world and the silent all pervading Reality from where it emerges and dissolves into, moment to moment.
The analogy with playing a game on the headset and reality isn’t correct. Of course we don’t see the full spectrum of the electromagnetic radiation and it is because it wasn’t needed for our survival. Some animals and insects see UV and infrared light but it doesn’t mean what we see isn’t a part of reality. We can’t perceive how our reality constructed because of the scale , the individual bits our physical objects are made of are way too small for us to be able to detect by our senses. What we perceive is the result of physical world interacting with our senses and how our physical body is affected by the laws of physics The blind man cannot see the reality around him but it doesn’t mean it’s not there , he is still affected by the same physical laws like everything around
What practical significance does it have in whether we are in a simulation when we hit our finger with a hammer? Only if awareness of this helps those of us who are shadows to begin to make a stronger connection with what Carl Jung called the individual shadow and the collective unconscious. I don't believe we are ready for that level of game or simulation.~
@@tubal1 I understand what you said because I am going through that phase where suffering does not touch me deeply and painfully. Thanks to my research into astral projections from my deep meditation trying not to translate it into human language like many do. I think that awareness has more potential than a pain-reducing pill ~
@@cuvarsnova Great, the process sometimes may seem slow but you can compare yourself with the being you were before engaging in meditation and studying and then realize you are in a better position now (if that meditation and study are correctly done). Another problem we find in this path is discipline specially when talking about meditation (at least in my case) because it's difficult to keep the rational mind silent and doing it in a regular way. For some people, as is my case, it's difficult to even take a few minutes from the ego which is fooled into believing the only real thing is the earthly pleasures, adictions, etc. But it's a process and everyone of us is experiencing a different one.
@@tubal1 The pleasure is to read signs (words) in which I empirically feel sincerity and recognize your truth. For me also, that second projection doesn't last longer than a few minutes, but it has a strong imprint. When you've already managed to open that plane, I would recommend you try another level of projection. It works for me when I'm sleep deprived and I start meditating with external audio preventing me from falling asleep (I usually play a recording of an occasional bell) and then I create the desired projections in my field of vision with my eyes closed. You can only see what you want in those projections more deeply because you also feel the inner structure and consciousness is much stronger than in deep meditation. It's not easy, just as deep meditation is not easy to achieve, but if you don't get upset when you don't succeed and you are persistent, you should open ~
@@cuvarsnova I have to stick to a more simple scheme. My problem is with the discipline required, not with the meditation technique itself. But thanks for sharing.
If reality is a simulation, is the simulation real? Such 'amazing' ideas come out after an AGI consult? Be careful, talking to AGI is life-threatening.
Warning : Long comment ahead. About ‘information’ - as a phenomenon in its own, as well as the role it fills in mental/mindful phenomena such as ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘cognition’, ‘intelligence’, ‘knowledgze’, ‘learning’, ‘understanding’, ‘sentience’, the ‘self’, ‘consciousness’, & ‘self-consciousness’ (to far less than exhaust the list). ‘Space’ & ‘time’, ‘matter’ & ‘energy’ - ‘information’. Elementary elements of reality ? An only slightly more exacting examination of reality - of the world around us - of our situation in all of its fullness as whatever it is that we are & as to whatever particular ‘realm’ within which we are located (within which we live, & move,& have our being) - enables any serious student thereof recognise that at this precise moment in time - namely 2024 - although ‘information’ is widely believed to be - along with ‘space’ & ‘time’, ‘matter’ & ‘energy’ - a basic, fundamental, elementary, even central component of reality, nevertheless - & however surprisingly - currently its - ‘informations’s’ - ontological identity remains completely unspecified - & totally unknown & wholly misunderstood. Not only has its correct - & fully verifiable - ontological identity not been established, but neither has a full, good, proper & fully verifiable science of the phenomenon also been first recognised, & then (verifiably) established. Put another way, the answers to the following questions remain completely unanswered. Worse. Even the most respected & widely referenced of investigators suggest answers which are manifestly incorrect. What is ‘information’ ? Is it a distinct & ‘stand alone’ phenomenon ? What is its standing in the existential hierarchy ? Is it an elemental phenomenon or does it emerge somewhere above the first few ladder steps of the scala naturale ? What role does it play &/or fulfill here in the Universe ? What is its causal efficacy - if it has any ? How does it come into being ? Is it conserved regardless of the interactions in which it may be involved ? What role, if any, does it fulfill in any mental, or mindful, or sentient phenomena, such as, say, ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘cognition’, ‘intelligence’, ‘knowledge’, ‘learning’, ‘understanding’, ‘sentience’, the ‘self’, ‘consciousness’, & ‘self-consciousness’ (to far less than exhaust the list). Is ‘information’ a strictly physical phenomenon ? Is ‘information’ (quintessentially) ‘digital’, & can (& do) digit-using machines, systems & devices ‘think’, &/or be ‘conscious’, & if so can these devices be ‘intelligent’ ? Are such phenomena as ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘cognition’, ‘intelligence’, ‘knowledge’, ‘learning’, ‘understanding’, ‘sentience’, the ‘self’, ‘consciousness’, & ‘self-consciousness’, digitally/computationally tractable, or is some other significantly different set of handling procedures &/or mechanical operations required by which any (dedicated) information-using machine, entity, system, gadget, contrivance or device can be, & is at least during operational times critically involved in any or all of these mental/mindful/sentient phenomena ? Although I am a rank & raving, aging antipodean amateur, some time ago my own research not too problematically allowed me to recognise - & verify, & establish - not only what ‘information’ is (its ontological identity) - as a phenomenon in its own right (& not just what any of it ‘says’, or means, or does), &, further, in addition, not only determine a full & fully verifiable science of the phenomenon, but also that of all of its closest cousins to boot, no less than such things as ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘intelligence’ & ‘consciousness’ which are manifestly (demonstrably) all information-related phenomena. With these particular (& fully verifiable) accomplishments under my belt, it is not difficult to show that one of the principal (& completely inexcusable) reasons we (er, the current intelligentsia, nor yet ‘the common person’) have not so far come to any good & proper - nor fully verifiable - understanding of these otherwise greatly sought-after yet still highly mysterious phenomena is due in great part to the simple fact that the current intelligentsia does not presently also have a good & proper, fully verifiable understanding, or science, of ‘information’ itself - that is, the contemporary cadre of seriously inquisitive person do not presently also have a clear & fully verifiable definition & understanding of ‘information’ itself - which is to say of ‘information’ as a phenomenon in its own right & not just what any of it ‘says’, or means or does. Let alone any of its closest cousins cousins …. Just saying ….. please be so gracious to reply to this comment if you wish to know more ….
[It will be said], "You were certainly in unmindfulness of this, and We have removed from you your cover, so your sight, this Day, is sharp."Surat Qaf, verse 22 . {Rather, man, against himself, will be a witness }Surat Al-Qiyamah, verse 14 , Holly Qur’an .
To claim perception and consciousness or vice versa the perception-independent physics would only be an "illusion", is logical nonsense. Just as a lie cannot be itself a lie (otherwise it would be the truth) , an illusion cannot be itself an illusion (otherwise it would be reality). It follows logically that knowledge and perception of reality is either completely correct or at least a adequate representation in suitable icons. The fact that we are limited in our possibilities and can be subject to deception in individual cases does not change this.
Oppps-what of those of us deemed lesser than-due to "deformities," miss shapened heads; what if some have hight I.Q.'s-which to me is ridiculous as a measurement! What of those who would have been euthanized but have actually gone on to have children who are successful? UGH! Akashic records!
Evolution is impossible. In order for an animal to evolve the sequence of nucleotide bases in the genome would have to change. However, randomly changing the nucleotide base sequence will simply destroy the instructions for creating that animal from a zygote. Randomly changing the nucleotide base sequence won't cause some kind of evolution towards a new and different animal. Doing that will only cause disorder, deformities and death. The animal would become extinct because of nonviable nucleotide base sequences long before reaching a viable nucleotide base sequence that creates a new and different animal.
As long as I am in Heaven, infinitely happy for an infinite time, I don't care how God "built" the world!! That is completely irrelevant. And, by the way, who are men to tell God whether He created the world in the right way or not? If He is God, He created the World in the perfect way, like everything that came from His hands!
The entire universe is a containment field for evil. seven lampstands create this reality with Light. Everything is made from that light. The mechanics, the projectors have been seen throughout history. in the West, there are 3.The Menorah, the Tetragrammaton Pentagram and the Silver Latin Cross. To see them, you must become Soul.
Donald constructs a mathematical toy model that displays the behaviour he wants and concludes that this is "a theorem of the theory". This guy is getting more delusional every day.
it seems that this consideration applies to almost all scientists - certainly to all those whose theories have been proven wrong. in fact scientific research cannot give certainties and the best discoveries are born from intuitions. it is possible that the intuitions of this man will prove true in the future.
@@ferdinandocoluccelli9574 It's not difficult to build another mathematical model that displays different behaviour. To select an appropriate model, the model must make predictions that allow it to be falsified. But Donald has never formulated any predictions. It's just pretentious words, no substance.
@@RHindriks-d9d what you are talking about is just a tiny enclosure in a huge land. someone from the enclosure looks over the fence to that magnificent panorama. math and science are that enclosure: they don't exhaust reality, they don't fully understand it, but they claim to describe it without really knowing it ... doesn't it seem absurd to you? anyway, if you want to stay there you may stay, but please avoid to think that the person looking out is wrong. 😊
Selcon hip a lone crime axedt 💯 mad up to cover crime porlise and himatize bran wash so my name in goggle despper was cry lot of avdens that meen ther is no up to good fight lyrs and my loyer agence me is any salutation
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](/img/n.gif)
What he’s really saying is what you call your life is made of the exact same substance as your dreams. It’s just a different frequency. All you can ever experience are frequencies 🤷♂️
Damn my dreams are a gigantic convoluted mess of emotions too !!
I love my dreams, I dislike my waking state.
@@KathiOsbornyou can change it once you recognize you are in a waking dream.
@divineoracle thank you
its not actually a computer simulation, its more a simulation for souls to experience, created by something that is all
Fabulous. Where did you find the evidence for this?
@crippsverse my fully enlightened mind
@@EDINXYWho told you you were fully enlightened? Why did you believe them?
This idea of physical reality existing to improve souls comes from Near Death Experiences and life between lives regression.
@@simonfernandes6809 What is a near death experience actually? Either you're dead or you're not. If I told you I had a near Hawaiian experience but never actually went to Hawaii but instead went to Disney Land would you consider the trip to Disney Land as actually going to Hawaii? And why are all so called near death experiences different? Some have a Jesus experience, some have a new age experience, some have a "It's all a simulation and we're all here to learn experience." I'll tell you why. They were all in a dream state brought on by the body releasing DMT.
The whole thing that we have wrong, in our approach to understanding Reality, is where we think it is that Reality is taking place. There is no outside universe from the point of view of the experiencer. This whole thing is us.
This. But personally I think it has to be the case that we (or 99 percent of people) don't see the whole thing. It is designed that way. So we can fully experience this illusion. The people who get it accidentally noticed a mistake in the matrix.
< "How can I know who I am, when I am all this?" he said, sweeping the surroundings with a
gesture of his head. > Carlos Castaneda
From the highest perspective there is no where and when. There is only "being", "existing". But that's breaks all our schemes which are based on space-time, precisely limited to that environment (space -time) so that we can play the game of life experience
@@tubal1 From the highest perspective, there's likely no experience.
@@yeeeehaaawbuddy I don't agree with you here. It's said that the upper layers (or dimensions) of reality have access and knowledge of the lower layers but not the opposite.
Interesting. Some people swear reality is not what it seems and one only begins to glimpse reality when in an altered state of mind.
Entheogens re-arrange sensory management systems. Human perceptions, no matter what influences them, are human perceptions.
Choosing to congratulate ourselves that we’ve broken the Big Code is merely hubris. Human hubris.
We don’t know what we don’t know. We don’t know what the limits of knowing involve. The mirror doesn’t pass its own judgement on the image it reflects.
I am one of these people - but it is futile to discuss this subject matter with people who are not 'experienced' themselves sufficiently.
🤯 🤯 Very Interesting Conversation !!
How do we see Rubert’s response to this?
..Or maybe the whole conversation?
Don, keep it up! love your ideas....
"That (the Invisible-Absolute) is whole; whole is this (the visible phenomenal); from the Invisible Whole comes forth the visible whole. Though the visible whole has come out from that Invisible Whole, yet the Whole remains unaltered." - Upanishads
Yes. Thank you!
We’re all just manifestations of the collapse of the wave function…
Bht the BIG question....what will happen first, will Grand Theft Auto 6 come out first? Or will we discover a unified theory of physics first?..
Personally Im hoping for GTA6 to come out first
Awesome 😎
Link to full conversation?
This is a dialogue about knowing. Truth is a purity measure, not a matter of understanding. Things can be true that are not accessible to senses. Senses do not measure truth, they measure data. Truth is an idea, data is information.
There is no argument to be made that “we need to watch the supercomputer” or not. The theorem that “Truth = Success” is unproven.
The young man asked the wise old monk, "How should I treat other people?" And the monk answered, "There are no 'other' people."
There’s a possibility, that my mind is wired up to a “computer interactive simulation.”
There are other beings but not other, "people" meaning their being is it our being as well.
Sure, but what the monk probably meant was that we are all unified, not separate, and that we should treat others as if they were ourselves. Not that we all exist in a computer simulation.
@@CJ-ff1xq 💯
Agent Smith “ alert “ 🚨
These conversations are amazing! Exposing the fundamentally false premise at the root of most scientific investigations, theories and research. 😮
Where can we find the whole conversation?
I'm still confused.
Then, that means the simulation is working fine. We are all confused at least partially and it is said that the next step is the awakening (knowing ur essence which controls the interface)
dreams were more real to me as a kids under 6. then you learn to count to 100 and we worship numbers: time, money, etc. Now at 49, my dreams are beginning to feel just as real, if not more real than waking life.
It's a simulation of stimulation - but not the way you think.
This makes alot of sense. So reality is simulating itself. But what is our purpose. How can we help reality realise and define itself? How do we know if we have reached a point in which we have enough purposeful intent to say we have a free will? Or are there no defined steps/ is there no end to this path?
The purpose is to know Almighty God, He created mankind to test them . the Qur'an explains it. Google/TH-cam the works of Ahmed Hulusi Turkish Sufi Spiritual master .
The purpose is knowing ourselves through experiencing life interactions. But at the end we all are one Thing, the whole, so u and me (and everything existing) are parts of the we hole which is experiencing itself through all this these parts interactions
You have free will from the first moment. Actually free will is the motor which triggered this "simulation". The whole "wants" to know itself so so interacts with itself through its parts (we and any being or thing existing)
I understand. I know we are all part of the whole. Which is magnificent and somehow scary at the same time. What i still do not understand, is for example, if free will is what started this, so it is a "core" part of reality, how is it, that sometimes in my life i knew what i wanted to do, but could not actually do it and gave in to addiction instead. Of course i learned, i became better and became stronger to give up addictions, but in so many moments of my life it felt like i could not actually make a decision. If i act reactive to someone insulting me for example, do i have a free will, if i did not actually decide to get angry or sad?
@@Martin-yv7pr According to some spiritual traditions, the human being is formed by different bodies. The lower (physical , material) body is related or conditioned by the ego (education, cultural environment, traumas, beliefs, etc); upper bodies are free of the ego so more triggered by free will than reactive to conditions.
Discovering that ur essence is the upper bodies (consciousness, soul, mental continuum in Buddhism, etc) is what is called awakening or enlightenment and is what makes u free from being reactive and suffering. This usually is a process through study, meditation,..., but some people had radical experiences which made this process instantaneous. The fact that you are aware of this means you took the first steps but , as I said, it's usually a process.
So then ignorance is not just bliss, it's profitable. The Kashardians finally makes sense.
And how do we “know truth” if all we experience is a simulation?
Because you aren’t a simulation, your form and personhood may be but you, your being, your actuality is reality. Reality doesn’t view itself directly because it is itself, it cannot get outside of itself, only virtually, it can only dream itself basically, it imagines and interprets itself, that’s what you are doing. Truth is the concept of what something actually is, unfiltered, yet all senses are filters, there’s only sound because we have ears, taste because we have tongues, you can use a visualiser on your computer to see music, it’s not any more correct to see it rather than hear it, there’s no “what it really sounds like” or “what it really tastes like”. There’s no need to search for truth because you are it, what you’re looking for is not truth, it’s a satisfying dream, a narrative.
Through awakening or enlightenment. We all shall experience this. Also, the simulation is real as well (the interface you use when playing is real): it's only a small part of the truth but it's truth also
Great. The underlying truth is hidden so we can play the game. This corresponds with all of the old spiritual traditions. Also, it doesn't mean the simulation is not truth (the screen, the headset, the hand controller are real...), it's just they sre only a small part of the truth
"To be is to be perceived." Berkeley
Not a simulation. The experiencing apparatus is (i.e. the human nervous system) is hierarchical and evolutionary in its design. For most humans the sophistication or refinement of the apparatus is such that its filtering out much of the phenomenal world yielding a dashboard simplification that is necessary adaptive for survival (that’s the hierarchical aspect of the design). Using Vedic technology of consciousness, the nervous system can refine the functioning of the dashboard to be more and more inclusive of both the phenomenal world and the silent all pervading Reality from where it emerges and dissolves into, moment to moment.
How though. What is this Vedic technology
The analogy with playing a game on the headset and reality isn’t correct.
Of course we don’t see the full spectrum of the electromagnetic radiation and it is because it wasn’t needed for our survival.
Some animals and insects see UV and infrared light but it doesn’t mean what we see isn’t a part of reality.
We can’t perceive how our reality constructed because of the scale , the individual bits our physical objects are made of are way too small for us to be able to detect by our senses.
What we perceive is the result of physical world interacting with our senses and how our physical body is affected by the laws of physics
The blind man cannot see the reality around him but it doesn’t mean it’s not there , he is still affected by the same physical laws like everything around
Apple trees must be experiencing a fictional reality too
The interviewer should really stop checking his phone or turn off his camera. It’s borderline disrespectful
I was making notes actually. My phone was nowhere to be seen. 🙏
@ ok my bad Simon. Sorry for the rushed judgement.
@@jespergbh No problem mate!
🙏🙏🙏
What practical significance does it have in whether we are in a simulation when we hit our finger with a hammer? Only if awareness of this helps those of us who are shadows to begin to make a stronger connection with what Carl Jung called the individual shadow and the collective unconscious. I don't believe we are ready for that level of game or simulation.~
The practical significance is that awareness helps you to not suffer. You will still feel the pain but you will not suffer, which are different things
@@tubal1 I understand what you said because I am going through that phase where suffering does not touch me deeply and painfully. Thanks to my research into astral projections from my deep meditation trying not to translate it into human language like many do. I think that awareness has more potential than a pain-reducing pill ~
@@cuvarsnova Great, the process sometimes may seem slow but you can compare yourself with the being you were before engaging in meditation and studying and then realize you are in a better position now (if that meditation and study are correctly done). Another problem we find in this path is discipline specially when talking about meditation (at least in my case) because it's difficult to keep the rational mind silent and doing it in a regular way. For some people, as is my case, it's difficult to even take a few minutes from the ego which is fooled into believing the only real thing is the earthly pleasures, adictions, etc. But it's a process and everyone of us is experiencing a different one.
@@tubal1 The pleasure is to read signs (words) in which I empirically feel sincerity and recognize your truth. For me also, that second projection doesn't last longer than a few minutes, but it has a strong imprint. When you've already managed to open that plane, I would recommend you try another level of projection. It works for me when I'm sleep deprived and I start meditating with external audio preventing me from falling asleep (I usually play a recording of an occasional bell) and then I create the desired projections in my field of vision with my eyes closed. You can only see what you want in those projections more deeply because you also feel the inner structure and consciousness is much stronger than in deep meditation. It's not easy, just as deep meditation is not easy to achieve, but if you don't get upset when you don't succeed and you are persistent, you should open ~
@@cuvarsnova I have to stick to a more simple scheme. My problem is with the discipline required, not with the meditation technique itself. But thanks for sharing.
Meehhh some interesting stuff in there but lots of assumptions and certainty
What he said it may all be wrong.. He's talking a theory based on mathematical outcomes how else can he speak an d make any sense?
If reality is a simulation, is the simulation real? Such 'amazing' ideas come out after an AGI consult? Be careful, talking to AGI is life-threatening.
Warning : Long comment ahead. About ‘information’ - as a phenomenon in its own, as well as the role it fills in mental/mindful phenomena such as ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘cognition’, ‘intelligence’, ‘knowledgze’, ‘learning’, ‘understanding’, ‘sentience’, the ‘self’, ‘consciousness’, & ‘self-consciousness’ (to far less than exhaust the list).
‘Space’ & ‘time’, ‘matter’ & ‘energy’ - ‘information’. Elementary elements of reality ?
An only slightly more exacting examination of reality - of the world around us - of our situation in all of its fullness as whatever it is that we are & as to whatever particular ‘realm’ within which we are located (within which we live, & move,& have our being) - enables any serious student thereof recognise that at this precise moment in time - namely 2024 - although ‘information’ is widely believed to be - along with ‘space’ & ‘time’, ‘matter’ & ‘energy’ - a basic, fundamental, elementary, even central component of reality, nevertheless - & however surprisingly - currently its - ‘informations’s’ - ontological identity remains completely unspecified - & totally unknown & wholly misunderstood.
Not only has its correct - & fully verifiable - ontological identity not been established, but neither has a full, good, proper & fully verifiable science of the phenomenon also been first recognised, & then (verifiably) established. Put another way, the answers to the following questions remain completely unanswered. Worse. Even the most respected & widely referenced of investigators suggest answers which are manifestly incorrect.
What is ‘information’ ? Is it a distinct & ‘stand alone’ phenomenon ? What is its standing in the existential hierarchy ? Is it an elemental phenomenon or does it emerge somewhere above the first few ladder steps of the scala naturale ? What role does it play &/or fulfill here in the Universe ? What is its causal efficacy - if it has any ? How does it come into being ? Is it conserved regardless of the interactions in which it may be involved ? What role, if any, does it fulfill in any mental, or mindful, or sentient phenomena, such as, say, ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘cognition’, ‘intelligence’, ‘knowledge’, ‘learning’, ‘understanding’, ‘sentience’, the ‘self’, ‘consciousness’, & ‘self-consciousness’ (to far less than exhaust the list). Is ‘information’ a strictly physical phenomenon ? Is ‘information’ (quintessentially) ‘digital’, & can (& do) digit-using machines, systems & devices ‘think’, &/or be ‘conscious’, & if so can these devices be ‘intelligent’ ? Are such phenomena as ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘cognition’, ‘intelligence’, ‘knowledge’, ‘learning’, ‘understanding’, ‘sentience’, the ‘self’, ‘consciousness’, & ‘self-consciousness’, digitally/computationally tractable, or is some other significantly different set of handling procedures &/or mechanical operations required by which any (dedicated) information-using machine, entity, system, gadget, contrivance or device can be, & is at least during operational times critically involved in any or all of these mental/mindful/sentient phenomena ?
Although I am a rank & raving, aging antipodean amateur, some time ago my own research not too problematically allowed me to recognise - & verify, & establish - not only what ‘information’ is (its ontological identity) - as a phenomenon in its own right (& not just what any of it ‘says’, or means, or does), &, further, in addition, not only determine a full & fully verifiable science of the phenomenon, but also that of all of its closest cousins to boot, no less than such things as ‘thought’, ‘mind’, ‘intelligence’ & ‘consciousness’ which are manifestly (demonstrably) all information-related phenomena.
With these particular (& fully verifiable) accomplishments under my belt, it is not difficult to show that one of the principal (& completely inexcusable) reasons we (er, the current intelligentsia, nor yet ‘the common person’) have not so far come to any good & proper - nor fully verifiable - understanding of these otherwise greatly sought-after yet still highly mysterious phenomena is due in great part to the simple fact that the current intelligentsia does not presently also have a good & proper, fully verifiable understanding, or science, of ‘information’ itself - that is, the contemporary cadre of seriously inquisitive person do not presently also have a clear & fully verifiable definition & understanding of ‘information’ itself - which is to say of ‘information’ as a phenomenon in its own right & not just what any of it ‘says’, or means or does. Let alone any of its closest cousins cousins ….
Just saying ….. please be so gracious to reply to this comment if you wish to know more ….
[It will be said], "You were certainly in unmindfulness of this, and We have removed from you your cover, so your sight, this Day, is sharp."Surat Qaf, verse 22 .
{Rather, man, against himself, will be a witness }Surat Al-Qiyamah, verse 14 ,
Holly Qur’an .
* *Holy* Qur’an maybe ?
anyway, good notes. thank you 😊
To claim perception and consciousness or vice versa the perception-independent physics would only be an "illusion", is logical nonsense.
Just as a lie cannot be itself a lie (otherwise it would be the truth) , an illusion cannot be itself an illusion (otherwise it would be reality).
It follows logically that knowledge and perception of reality is either completely correct or at least a adequate representation in suitable icons.
The fact that we are limited in our possibilities and can be subject to deception in individual cases does not change this.
You don't know what I think.
Oppps-what of those of us deemed lesser than-due to "deformities," miss shapened heads; what if some have hight I.Q.'s-which to me is ridiculous as a measurement! What of those who would have been euthanized but have actually gone on to have children who are successful? UGH!
Akashic records!
Anyone can say anything. Prove it. 🧐
please prove that anything should be proved in order to be true 😊
Evolution is impossible. In order for an animal to evolve the sequence of nucleotide bases in the genome would have to change. However, randomly changing the nucleotide base sequence will simply destroy the instructions for creating that animal from a zygote. Randomly changing the nucleotide base sequence won't cause some kind of evolution towards a new and different animal. Doing that will only cause disorder, deformities and death. The animal would become extinct because of nonviable nucleotide base sequences long before reaching a viable nucleotide base sequence that creates a new and different animal.
So how did different breeds of dogs appear after the Wolf?
The different breeds of dogs and wolves were separately created from each other.
As long as I am in Heaven, infinitely happy for an infinite time, I don't care how God "built" the world!! That is completely irrelevant. And, by the way, who are men to tell God whether He created the world in the right way or not? If He is God, He created the World in the perfect way, like everything that came from His hands!
😂okay
Hoffman is a mystic, not a scientist.
perhaps a mystic scientist 🙃😉
I see Hoffman. I subscribe. Now what'll you do next to keep me?
Say hi 👋🏼 thanks for being here 🙏💫
The entire universe is a containment field for evil. seven lampstands create this reality with Light. Everything is made from that light. The mechanics, the projectors have been seen throughout history. in the West, there are 3.The Menorah, the Tetragrammaton Pentagram and the Silver Latin Cross. To see them, you must become Soul.
Donald constructs a mathematical toy model that displays the behaviour he wants and concludes that this is "a theorem of the theory". This guy is getting more delusional every day.
it seems that this consideration applies to almost all scientists - certainly to all those whose theories have been proven wrong. in fact scientific research cannot give certainties and the best discoveries are born from intuitions. it is possible that the intuitions of this man will prove true in the future.
@@ferdinandocoluccelli9574 It's not difficult to build another mathematical model that displays different behaviour. To select an appropriate model, the model must make predictions that allow it to be falsified. But Donald has never formulated any predictions. It's just pretentious words, no substance.
@@RHindriks-d9d what you are talking about is just a tiny enclosure in a huge land. someone from the enclosure looks over the fence to that magnificent panorama.
math and science are that enclosure: they don't exhaust reality, they don't fully understand it, but they claim to describe it without really knowing it ... doesn't it seem absurd to you?
anyway, if you want to stay there you may stay, but please avoid to think that the person looking out is wrong. 😊
@@ferdinandocoluccelli9574 That sounds so deep and mysterious!
@@RHindriks-d9d it's not. just try to get out of the fence and you'll know. good luck! 🥰
Selcon hip a lone crime axedt 💯 mad up to cover crime porlise and himatize bran wash so my name in goggle despper was cry lot of avdens that meen ther is no up to good fight lyrs and my loyer agence me is any salutation
zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
How can such intelligent men talk such rubbish?
Explain why it's rubbish. We'll wait.