Turtle WoW 2.0 Speculations and Desires

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 69

  • @daniel-yeshua
    @daniel-yeshua 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The best WOW server I ever see.

  • @LightisMyStrength
    @LightisMyStrength 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm interested in seeing what they end up doing. I am enjoying the project a lot.

  • @TaediumVitae5700
    @TaediumVitae5700 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    3.3.5 would be amazing, performance, stability and the ease of modding would be really appreciated

  • @inferno8008
    @inferno8008 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    @01:02 I clicked subscribe and like..then I heard u say "Phasing".....

  • @potatopotato1353
    @potatopotato1353 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I think TWoW 2.0 will include Outland, but in thier vision. Which also means Draenei but from W3 look. How they will made female models, idk.

    • @MalonzeProductionsGaming
      @MalonzeProductionsGaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      AAW has female broken modles

    • @potatopotato1353
      @potatopotato1353 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MalonzeProductionsGaming I know, but Turtle will make it? Who knows. Also i wouldn't mind some AoE for rogues.

    • @javierr5481
      @javierr5481 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      They should do Northrend before Outland.

    • @Horus-89
      @Horus-89 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@javierr5481 yesss.

    • @kyleellis1825
      @kyleellis1825 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or they can just give male draenei and male ogres.

  • @ricardin2498
    @ricardin2498 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    OFC Major classchanges fixes, check x example, they add a lot of new Fist weapons, who are great, but man, arms warriors or survivalist hunters could use some enhance n the talents in order to make some juice with fist weapons, also more custom quest, n regular areas.m sadly they already say there no 3.3.5a server change happening

  • @rvt_h3d
    @rvt_h3d 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Its 2024 and people are still clicking their spells lol.

    • @MalonzeProductionsGaming
      @MalonzeProductionsGaming  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Its 2024 I'll play how I want to. Which is the way I've played for 19 years.

  • @TheRecklessRaccoon
    @TheRecklessRaccoon 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would love to see a custom non battleground pvp area like wintergraps or tol barad. I loved those events that would happen every 3 hours with daily's to do in-between

  • @NiccoH34db4ng
    @NiccoH34db4ng 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Client is a big issue,the current TW client version is too ancient and really cripples the gameplay.
    I didn't liked the overall end game experience,first I tried to get pre raid gear but I rarely found people running those dungeons,then I tried PVP but they still use the old vanilla system and honestly I don't want to waste all that time for a set that is outclassed by PVE raid gear.
    In the end I have just quit the server,the leveling experience was good but a new player doesn't have much to do after reaching 60.

  • @fufu1405
    @fufu1405 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm blown away how people think they might do Outland or Northrend. They wouldn't. It's the two continents and they want to focus on those. That's why we're playing on here. 2.0 will simply be vanilla on the wotlk client.

    • @MalonzeProductionsGaming
      @MalonzeProductionsGaming  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      i never mentioned outland or northrend

    • @fufu1405
      @fufu1405 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MalonzeProductionsGaming Oh no I wasn't talking about you, there were just some people saying that in the comment section.

    • @kyleellis1825
      @kyleellis1825 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd rather see them do smaller max level zones for those places. Instead of Outlands, just give us a version of Hellfire Pennisnsula (isn't the beta one still in the vanilla files, that they could make a small zone out of?). Same with Nothrend, in WC3, it's really just the frozen shore and the glacier.
      Kul Tiras and Zandalar can all get added in as small single town islands like KEzan, like how the lore had described them for decades.

  • @kl4cey
    @kl4cey 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you run this on a tablet?

  • @niledemitri3079
    @niledemitri3079 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Turtle wow 2.0 will be released!!!

  • @Freedom-of-speech4
    @Freedom-of-speech4 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    If they put 3.3.5 client i will defo give it a try again.

  • @pedrusthewarrior
    @pedrusthewarrior 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    all i wish is that my shaman could ghost wolf indoors

  • @viewsbro
    @viewsbro 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thinking of making a toon, is bg pvp ques active?

    • @MalonzeProductionsGaming
      @MalonzeProductionsGaming  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Last I checked really only active at lv 60. And some 50-59. Rarely lower brackets. And no one plays the new bg

  • @RoachieWoW
    @RoachieWoW 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The buggy UI on private servers is what bothers me most. Theres work arounds but after the Gilneas update i didn't want to go through the bother of installing TWoW again

    • @joezar33
      @joezar33 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bot's on that server , last I played seen a few at STV on the Alliance.

    • @delliveromofficielle9551
      @delliveromofficielle9551 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Havent saw them now ​@@joezar33

    • @Redstripe921
      @Redstripe921 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What happened on Gilneas update ? I had zero issues.

    • @RoachieWoW
      @RoachieWoW 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Redstripe921 when it came out the game wouldnt install for alot of people you had to do a full-reinstall. I havent tried since that day tho tbh

    • @Redstripe921
      @Redstripe921 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RoachieWoW ah ok myself i had it already installed i never heard about the issues

  • @a.f.7650
    @a.f.7650 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Comparing vanilla as it should've been with later expansions isn't really a fruitful endeavour.
    Some ideas and mechanics (if technically possible for the old engine game) might work quite well, alas, the entire PvP zone for pve realm won't work since it's been done before several times.
    I think some new secrets and quest lines will surely take place, however, I wouldn't like to see them "upgrade" to another expansion engine.

  • @GG-jm6gi
    @GG-jm6gi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1.5.1 WAS THE BEST PATCH(PRE WRATH PATCH)

  • @barryblack633
    @barryblack633 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The horse mount not sound in turtle lol

  • @NATEDAWGG79
    @NATEDAWGG79 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This might be an unpopular opinion, but I want TWoW to have a real RDF system, or at least make the summoning stones work. I avoid a lot of dungeons just for the simple fact I don't want to go through the trouble of getting there.

    • @misty6348
      @misty6348 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The trouble getting there is annoying but makes the overall experience more memorable. You rarely will remember a rdf queue compared to how many you'll think about when you travel there and look back at it fondly. Its worse in the short term but long term makes it a lot more enjoyable.

    • @NATEDAWGG79
      @NATEDAWGG79 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@misty6348 Well summoning stones would be the best way then. So the few people like yourself that enjoy traveling still can. The rest of us can wait for the summon. 😂

    • @MalonzeProductionsGaming
      @MalonzeProductionsGaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      While yes that is true, that is not the primary reason why RFD is a terrible system. the main reason is what I like to call the "retail" mentality where there is 0 reason for any member of the group to stay when they can just go find another group and be right back in the dungeon without consequence. By forcing a player to wait a long time for a group. prep. walk there, ect without the QoL of instant teleport for anything, that incentivizes the group to not only come prepared int he first place, but also to not leave because of 1 mistake or "taking to long, gonna find better group" mentality. Yes it still happens but far much less then if RFD was added.. Every private server that has added the full system in has had the "retail mentality" While those who have no RFD or the half one like turtle does, players are far more likely to stay in thier groups and push through if they run a bit slower or they die once or twice.

    • @NATEDAWGG79
      @NATEDAWGG79 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MalonzeProductionsGaming Well the intentions of what you think is commendable, and I can respect that. Ask yourself this, have you ever turned down a warlock summons? No one ever says na, I'm just going to walk. So I think activating the stones would be a good middle ground.

    • @MalonzeProductionsGaming
      @MalonzeProductionsGaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stones and summons are not as big of an issue because it still requires player interaction. As well as going to the start of the dungeon with the group to summon that straggler. While issues can come of it, its still not near the level of "retail mentality" that the instant teleport of RFD has.
      im personally half and half with the stone system by itself. on one hand you have the benefit of helping out players who happen to be in the furthest possible spot from the dungeon to get there quicker. but on the other hand it means you have the lazy mf'ers who let the other players do the walk for them, even if they were in manageable distance from the portal.

  • @alexnas9634
    @alexnas9634 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    honestly, i played both vanilla back in 2004 and classic and twow and had reached 60 with end game gear in most(stopped at turtlewow endgame) and Twows XP progression is VERY quick!

  • @TheMoldyOne
    @TheMoldyOne 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    remake the game in unreal engine 5 and just change nothing other than map size make it bigger.

    • @illeagle666
      @illeagle666 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lol can you imagine the time and energy that would take to develop? Come on, be realistic!

  • @turinhorse
    @turinhorse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    meh, too late. Project Epoch is the future

    • @illeagle666
      @illeagle666 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      After watching the trailers, I really don’t see what’s special about Epoch. Looks pretty rough around the edges, and what we do see is pretty over the top. I might give it a shot, but I love Turtle

    • @turinhorse
      @turinhorse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@illeagle666"rough around the edges"? what does that even mean? how can you tell that from a trailer? theres been multiple open betas.. have you even played it?

    • @MalonzeProductionsGaming
      @MalonzeProductionsGaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @illeagle666 Epoch has some great features that it will have at launch, however I would say the one thing that turtle wow has above it, is time. Turtle has been around for years. built up from launch and built its playerbase higher then even nost i think. only beaten by maybe ascension. Epoch will start off against a tsunami of a server and will have to prove itself with not only the launch but the longevity if it is to grow and possibly surpass turtle.
      Im not against it, im rooting for it as it seems like a very good server. Im just being realistic that it has alot of obstacles to reach its goal

    • @illeagle666
      @illeagle666 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@turinhorse I haven't played it, which is why i'm asking the specifics about what differenciates it from Twow :)

    • @turinhorse
      @turinhorse 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@illeagle666Malonze and many others have covered the differences. or you can read the website? did you ask people in school to do your homework for you as well?

  • @rookie28604
    @rookie28604 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hot take, private servers are trash.

    • @illeagle666
      @illeagle666 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Bad take. But you can keep paying a sub for a lesser product :)

    • @leave0901
      @leave0901 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Blizzard is the trash of trashes now, seriously