What is the accuracy of Iskander missiles

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2024
  • Russia possesses the largest and most diverse nuclear missile force globally, inherited from the Soviet era. Throughout its conflict with Ukraine, Russia has effectively deployed various missile systems, including ballistic and cruise missiles. Among these, the 9K720 Iskander stands out for its speed and accuracy, often proving to be a potent weapon on the battlefield.
    One notable instance of the Iskander missile's effectiveness was seen last year when the Russian military introduced a new tactic. They fired Iskander missiles multiple times at the same target, surprising the Ukrainian forces and causing significant damage. This tactic was possible because Iskander missiles can launch two missiles from a single vehicle, enhancing their firepower considerably.
    Russia's heavy reliance on this missile really shows how much faith they have in its abilities. It leaves us questioning just how accurate it is, and is it truly that formidable?
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 363

  • @jonathanjacob5453
    @jonathanjacob5453 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +291

    I don’t understand why people keep trying to use “the Soviet” era derogatorily. The Abraham’s and F16 both date from the Soviet era.

    • @arandomwalk
      @arandomwalk 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Because Western propagandistic media says everything Soviet was bad quality or poor 🤡

    • @SimbaM2kufu
      @SimbaM2kufu 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +52

      80% of all US weapons were made when the Soviet Union was still a country.

    • @Din.Djarin
      @Din.Djarin 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      👆🏽

    • @user-jz1ft5jp5k
      @user-jz1ft5jp5k 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

      Искандер разработан уже в России в СССР была система Ока которая попала под договор о сокращении вооружения ,а именно ракет средней дальности .

    • @doctorjivago5081
      @doctorjivago5081 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is kind of propaganda - to emphasize and suggest, that the Russians couldn't do anything good by theirself, but they must to lie on Soviet's achievements...

  • @vs9934
    @vs9934 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +246

    I suggest to ask those french soldiers in Slavyansk, how accurate Iskander is. Not sure they would be there to answer though.

    • @wallingnaga6563
      @wallingnaga6563 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +21

      Exactly heard that the survivors ran away 😂

    • @simonneke805
      @simonneke805 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +20

      The survivors are back in France. They dont want that smoke. 😂

    • @user-xt8ty6hr3p
      @user-xt8ty6hr3p 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Отличие французских военных НАТО от других военнослужащих НАТО в том, что американские, британские и польские генералы и офицерский состав умеют красиво "случайно" умереть от сердечного приступа или упасть с велосипеда в Альпах, неудачно прыгнуть с высоты в каньон или разбиться в автомобильной аварии со смертельным исходом...согласно красивым никрологам стран НАТО, а у французкого командования просто нет фантазии придумать красивую историю о их "случайной" смерти, поэтому они говорят правду о том где, как, и при каких обстоятельствах солдаты Франции умирают на украинском полигоне НАТО. Не хватает креативности и денег для того, чтобы заклеить рот родственникам погибших солдат и офицеров, чтоб они не говорили, при каких обстоятельствах погиб их близкий. А так умирают все по одной причине, нет осознания, что восточные славяне это три народа, но Отечество у них одно на всех и поэтому украинские партизаны (70% от всей Украины) будет делать всё, чтобы помочь российской армии уничтожить натовских янычар на земле наших предков.

    • @fredlight
      @fredlight 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +39

      @@wallingnaga6563 Yep, they ran away, their legs one way, their head and body another🤣

    • @iROChakri
      @iROChakri 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      😂😂😂 ​@@wallingnaga6563

  • @robertcuellar4132
    @robertcuellar4132 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +101

    New version has 1000km range when fired with a 500kg war head

    • @Ghosy01
      @Ghosy01 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

      new version with a fab 500 . i like that

    • @robertcuellar4132
      @robertcuellar4132 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @@Ghosy01 yep also use similar tech that's in the old Soviet anti ship missile called ship wreck the missile can communicate with each other in flight to coordinate a attack

    • @steveb890
      @steveb890 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      🤣🤣

    • @user-oq1xg4ml4v
      @user-oq1xg4ml4v 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Ghosy01 and fab 3000

    • @livmurray1958
      @livmurray1958 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Ukraine will have THE NEPTUNE ready by 2025 same distance 1000

  • @BanzLanda86
    @BanzLanda86 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +48

    According to unconfirmed reports, Bugdanov was reportedly killed in a missile strike today. So, the Iskandars are deadly!

    • @chewpchewp9670
      @chewpchewp9670 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Source please

    • @niggis76
      @niggis76 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Chould be true, after terror attack he is legit target and russia is looking for him. But we need confirmation first, these rumours has been around earlier too

    • @BanzLanda86
      @BanzLanda86 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      @@chewpchewp9670 Remember, I've stated unconfirmed!

  • @BeachCity
    @BeachCity 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +154

    Your intro states Russia has a missile legacy from the USSR. Well OK, but Iskander wasn't put into use until 2006. This means Iskander was put in use under modern Russia not the USSR. Development began in 1988 and first successful launch was in 1996. First use in combat was in 2008. Iskander travels near Mach 6 and is considered ballistic. Kinzhal is non ballistic and travels at mach 10 with greater range than Iskander. Both weapons systems are very fast and difficult to impossible for current western anti aircraft systems to intercept. The Patriot intercept missiles of the U.S. travel at between mach 3 to 5 and are slower than either the Iskander or Kinzhal.

    • @williammurphy-zp6nj
      @williammurphy-zp6nj 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Lmao highly inaccurate… the PAAC 4 SkyCeptor can easily knock those bad boys down though I mean even the older PAC 3 and 2 that Ukraine has is knocking them out of the air. Though I mean Ukrainian capability and the United States capabilities are far different logos the US can knock ANYTHING it wants out of the sky.

    • @seregag1678
      @seregag1678 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +20

      @@williammurphy-zp6njfor your sake I hope you never find out

    • @Drakaris-Og
      @Drakaris-Og 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@williammurphy-zp6njYou mean a lot

    • @ufukpolat3480
      @ufukpolat3480 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      Nobody claims it was deployed under the USSR but the whole military industrial infrastructure of Russia is of Soviet origin. Soviets spent billions of rubles educating scientists, engineers, creating programs and institutions, developing the experience and the know how with which these weapons could be produced. Most people who work in those institutions even today were born and educated in the USSR as well as having inherited the culture and the expertise to design and build these weapons. Iskander is a result of that heritage, end of story.

    • @steveb890
      @steveb890 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Wrong ...Kinzhal is an air launched ballistic missile, and both have around the same range..... yes they can be intercepted in the lower atmosphere where they have to slow down to supersonic speeds in the "thicker" air. US interceptors SM-3 Block 1A/B can do Mach 8.8, the Block IIA can do Mach 13.2 !

  • @pouwakaruwhiu8349
    @pouwakaruwhiu8349 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +15

    Bloody awesome weaponry from Russia 🇷🇺, from Australia 🦘

  • @MikVision
    @MikVision 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +52

    Starts saying, it's effective.
    Then says, is it really that effective??????? XD
    This Chat GPT Content farm is getting pretty ridiculous lately.

  • @user-xt8ty6hr3p
    @user-xt8ty6hr3p 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +63

    Наша детка "Искандер" очень бесстрашный и горячий мальчик. Никогда не дает в обиду девочек России.❤

  • @mrnic3guy305
    @mrnic3guy305 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +34

    Iskander is no joke

  • @seregag1678
    @seregag1678 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +49

    I would consider Ukrainian conflict a world war honestly. It’s collective West vs collective South. Ukraine just got convinced into using their people to test Russia’s defences on NATOs behalf , but the collective West didn’t realise that during all conflicts Russia first gets punched really hard, learns and comes back with a win. Russian military is much stronger now than it was before the war, and it has large scale combat experience (not chasing flip flop wearing beduins) and it knows how to deal with Western weapons now. The West should have been friends with Russia not enemies. Now the world is going to shit thanks to the decision makers the people of the West have elected.

    • @najiv8797
      @najiv8797 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Totally agree..

    • @hansolo1571
      @hansolo1571 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I see this conflict as pointless. West has history of bombing many countries and has accepted illegal separation of Kosovo that belongs to another country. So now we are heading towards ww3 or maybe are in ww3, because Ukraine is bombed and they lost 20% of its territory? War over something that has been accepted as normal by Western standards? That seems detached from reality, and politics and media of both sides are completely opposite from one another. That is dangerous.

    • @zksstalstawidlo9015
      @zksstalstawidlo9015 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      True

    • @Walrus-ji4qz
      @Walrus-ji4qz 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You don't understand how democracy works. The elected politicians are only actors who do and say what ever they are told to do and say. The decision making process is controlled by the civil servants.

  • @Nolefan1966
    @Nolefan1966 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +82

    It wasn't the first Patriot missile system it was the last Patriot missile system because they're all gone now😂😂

    • @user-zk2hl9ib9u
      @user-zk2hl9ib9u 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      остался один-его вчера передала германия

    • @non9886
      @non9886 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      exactly! on the top of that patriot is not able to intercept almost any russian missile. maybe drone or aircraft, but russia is using guided bombs far from battle zone and patriots are deep in ukraine defense zone. and they are not able to shoot down migs in 20 km altitute anyway. patriot missiles are quite slow and short range. mig can shoot them down or fly away...

    • @kingnorlen
      @kingnorlen 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      According to rumors, a few more arrived in Kyiv, not sure how many tho, and a couple has already been deleted, lol

  • @jayspik6498
    @jayspik6498 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Accuracy being that if your GPS targeted by Iskander, you’re gonna have a really bad day. That being your last day. Period

  • @user-hf4kv3jy5w
    @user-hf4kv3jy5w 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +21

    From the videos showing the Iskander missile strikes, it is very accurate

  • @RandleBeckford
    @RandleBeckford 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    Do you really want to know how accurate the Iskander is?
    Putin would say "f*** around and find out.

  • @vkham9944
    @vkham9944 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +33

    Iskander missile is a military masterpiece. 🤓

  • @caloyskienonoyiii7102
    @caloyskienonoyiii7102 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    Superb capabilities!!!

  • @wisdomguy9837
    @wisdomguy9837 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    Russia has the most advance missile system in the world.

  • @Pinoyslayer8888
    @Pinoyslayer8888 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +19

    Has been almost 3 years and I haven’t seen any of interceptions Ukraine claimed

    • @TacoTomtheBomb
      @TacoTomtheBomb 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @user-nv1zh4vk9m I saw some shovels, but they looked like Soviet era models.

    • @Pinoyslayer8888
      @Pinoyslayer8888 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @user-nv1zh4vk9m Video about Iskander missiles and you talk about decisive victory cope harder

    • @wallingnaga6563
      @wallingnaga6563 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @user-nv1zh4vk9m
      Ukraine also said that they will be having tea on the coast of Crimea by fall 2023 where is it ?

    • @user-xt8ty6hr3p
      @user-xt8ty6hr3p 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@user-nv1zh4vk9mв Арктике правит Россия, кто теперь в Африке главный? Кто демилитаризовал блок НАТО? Кто помогает Ирану, Китаю и Северной Кореи оружием (гиперзвуковым) и обучает их офицерский состав? Кто ускоряет дедолларизацию в мире, превращая США в регионального лилипута? Кто создал продовольственный рынок хлеба в мире и держит в руках продовольствие в мире? Кто создал аналог газового ОПЕК? Кто пинком ноги открывает дверь в ОПЕК и решает, кому дать нефть, а кому нет, устанавливая цены? Кто забрал Азовское море и 28% суши Украины? Кто заработал хорошую прибыль и стал пятой экономикой мира, а в этом году станет четвертой экономикой мира, находясь под 16000 санкциями, а? Во истину, дураку не рассказывают весь задуманный план до конца, ибо он и масштаба задуманного не поймёт и сам себе что-нибудь поломает.😅 Игра гроссмейстера в шахматы не для вас, переходите к раскраскам для трёхлетних детей.

    • @user-yy7ic3dh3y
      @user-yy7ic3dh3y 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      ​@user-nv1zh4vk9m Бро за 30 лет в Афганистане я не видел победы Америки над талибами а они даже не регулярная армия😊...

  • @ivanovfarit
    @ivanovfarit 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Oh those shovels are terrifying.

  • @StraussBR
    @StraussBR 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    I remember nato countries saying russia would run out of missiles
    The Islander particularly seems to be growing in trees and it is so deadly it feels wrong

  • @lorenzolry
    @lorenzolry 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +67

    US fanboys really quiet 😂😂😂

    • @contentinmotion
      @contentinmotion 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Taking out a patriot defense system WHILE BEING TRANSPORTED ISN'T REALLY AN ACHIEVEMENT

    • @TacoTomtheBomb
      @TacoTomtheBomb 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Taking out 2 Patriot missile systems as the video stated, is not the same as taking out two Patriot launchers. Each system is comprised of up to 8 launchers. So while taking out one quarter of a system's replaceable launchers is good for Russia--especially for propaganda--it is no where near as impactful as destroying 2 Systems. Of course destroying any air defenses is important, especially in this new style of warfare. Had the launchers been properly used as intended, further to the rear, set up ready to fire, instead of sitting there at the front for far too long, the outcome likely would have different. The Iskander seems effective at what it does, but is limited by its range.

    • @ahinomas2805
      @ahinomas2805 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      ​@@TacoTomtheBomb😂

    • @Sevastopol91
      @Sevastopol91 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@TacoTomtheBomb
      It's limited by its range only due to the short and medium range missiles agreement between the US and Russia, which now is off the table btw as far as I know. And which means that the range of newly produced missiles isn't necessarily 400-500 km anymore. But even 400-500 km is pretty much enough for Ukraine war theater. For greater ranges there are bigger better toys in Russia's arsenal, Russia can pretty much reach anything anywhere on this planet, and then some more.

    • @TacoTomtheBomb
      @TacoTomtheBomb 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@Sevastopol91 Yeah there are a lot of weapons that haven't been used yet, probably best to keep it that way. I for one don't need to see a successful missile strike from half way around the world. Regional defensive missiles are one thing, long range ones will get us all in trouble because sooner or later someone will launch one.

  • @tomraider099
    @tomraider099 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Damn, i have never seen a shovel that big can fly. 💀

  • @tyalexander8154
    @tyalexander8154 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    The MSM told us that Russia was running out of bullets and rockets and tanks and soldiers and that Ukraine is winning the war I think you call that propaganda 😂

    • @goulddddable
      @goulddddable 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Russia needed to fight with shovels because they ran out of bullets and drop washing machines from their planes because they ran out of bombs. Russia has a sense of humor.

  • @EYEWITNESS.
    @EYEWITNESS. 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    But but but celenskyy said they intercepted one using a targeted building 🤡🤡🤡

    • @veritasliberabitvos454
      @veritasliberabitvos454 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Well that Patriot system took it out, by being hit. So, I agree, it is just a matter of perspective.

  • @user-ft2bt9kw7x
    @user-ft2bt9kw7x 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +100

    America can’t match it with their old missiles

    • @hanshuber1875
      @hanshuber1875 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      less copium ivan, all your lies dont change the reality. Did you learn nothing from the collapse of the USSR?

    • @fajarfaranza4280
      @fajarfaranza4280 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      America has prsm Precision strike missile

    • @YaS-xf5wy
      @YaS-xf5wy 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      that sounds like the biggest myth. They spend 900 BILLION for their military. Dont you think they have that ultra advanced stuff already , keeping it for when shit hits the fan? Russia would be a joke to the US if they fought only with ground troops and without nukes

    • @emjizone
      @emjizone 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      *400km is too short to hit America from the Russian territory* anyways, except in Alaska. And it that case, the launchers would be *vulnerable to air strikes.*
      In fact, none of the 36 nations of the American continent, nor the dependencies of extra-continental nations on the continent of America, really felt the need to develop a weapon specifically to counter the Iskander missile, because *they didn't see it as a real threat on their territory.*
      *The situation in Easter and Central Europe and Asia is very different* and as *diverse* as the economic characteristics of each nation. The case of Ukraine is particularly dire because their budget was a bit small to face such a threat, and this nation never really prepared for war. They had no plans to attack anyone, were trying to have the best international relations possible, and thought that all the other nations around them, including Russia, would had much better things to do than try to destroy them at any cost. Now it's quite late to find clean and safe solutions to this (deterrent, I mean), so I expect to see dirty solutions only.

    • @mrbigberd
      @mrbigberd 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      US missiles are just as good. The problem is that Americans are convinced that nobody else can make decent missiles.

  • @hankogle6858
    @hankogle6858 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    I like how people just brush past the fab 3000 glide missiles. They are basically Soviet era missiles. That Russia has an abundance of,with a modern attachment that helps them glide and are extremely accurate. The reason Russia hasn’t used them yet is because they are so destructive. I don’t know if they are comparable to a Moab or something less than nuclear. I know they are powerful

    • @Samurai___Jack
      @Samurai___Jack 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Бережем для высокопоставленных и уважаемых гостей с "запада"

    • @johnnewman1483
      @johnnewman1483 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What u smoking ?😂

    • @rudociliak6683
      @rudociliak6683 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They are dropping the fab 500 as of recent and that alone is quite a huge bomb

  • @Jess-kg8ge
    @Jess-kg8ge 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    if anyone misheard ..its MACH 6-7 not MACH 67

    • @storyanaksekolah2
      @storyanaksekolah2 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      67 mach could reach the America in minutea 😂

    • @akinci8892
      @akinci8892 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I noticed it too

  • @Wilderness_Tv
    @Wilderness_Tv 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

    NOW this is pointy!
    -what? I don't care if it's pointy, the shape of the missile has nothing to do with payload delivery.
    Are you kidding? This is what I said! You got me executed for that.
    -I always said it!
    cit. The dictator.

    • @ReeksOfLies
      @ReeksOfLies 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Are you OK there, buddy? Do you need me to send you help? *Nod ur head and blink one time for* _Yes!_

    • @afhharmse
      @afhharmse 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ReeksOfLies

    • @VGYugo
      @VGYugo 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@ReeksOfLies Aladeen Efawadh (Sacha Baron Cohen) - The Dictator

    • @iagosevatar4865
      @iagosevatar4865 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      "I don't want my rocket to look like a dildo!"

    • @Wilderness_Tv
      @Wilderness_Tv 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@VGYugo Haffaz aladeen son of Omar aladeen. Efawahad is the double (wink wink) and motzi the little goat.

  • @octaviomartinez2355
    @octaviomartinez2355 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    They call it the Sniper

  • @Jawad-93
    @Jawad-93 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    سلیقه و تکنالوژی موشکی روسیه بینظیر است🔥

  • @ReeksOfLies
    @ReeksOfLies 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +41

    Well being the Russians were the first to get up into space, first to the moon, first to Venus (multiple times), first to mars (multiple times) etc etc.
    They have always been more than decent at Rockets, and as such made decent missiles. People like to talk shit about how bad Russians are, and yea sure, we have some better stuff, but we also have 10x the defense budget to do so in the US.
    *Though,* if there wasn't such bad corruption over there back in Soviet times stealing money that could of help with development even more, who knows how great they could of been over there in theses areas of rocket science and such.

    • @rgw5991
      @rgw5991 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      Also putin was shown a video (By his own cabinet) proving that the american moon landing was fake. hahahahaha. He thought it was quite funny. It sounds like a joke but its real. I saw a video of putin being shown the proof.

    • @user-vd2jl8oh7y
      @user-vd2jl8oh7y 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Ты наверно не осведомлён всё ваше новое оружие не работает хорошо а ракеты ваши в основном 70-80-90 годов пора списывать у вас бюджет в 10 раз больше а толку нет, нет конструкторского задела а с программным обеспечением у нас всё развивается да и в системе РЭБ вы отстали лет на 20 так что не пыли по чём зря...

    • @user-jz1ft5jp5k
      @user-jz1ft5jp5k 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Вы правы , в США разработками занимаются частные компании для которых главное больше денег урвать из бюджета и у них большое лоби в конгрессе ,а в России оборонная промышленность в основном в руках государства и при меньшем бюджете есть результат.

    • @user-jz1ft5jp5k
      @user-jz1ft5jp5k 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      ​@@rgw5991да эту тему мусолят уже давно.

  • @rogersmith8480
    @rogersmith8480 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +17

    ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

  • @storyanaksekolah2
    @storyanaksekolah2 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Himars has been taken down, but no Iskander or even tornado missile taken down 😂

  • @lenedfm499
    @lenedfm499 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +15

    nice

  • @ReShout876
    @ReShout876 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    that ending caught me off-guard

  • @Walrus-ji4qz
    @Walrus-ji4qz 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    The Patriot systems can not stop the Iskander. Period.

  • @simon9070
    @simon9070 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    was the destroyed Patriot on the move or deployed? Makes a massive difference.... actually Patriot is about as useful as a dead rat in a tampon factory if it's on the move

    • @schepvogelk5971
      @schepvogelk5971 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      I think they followed the convoy, when they parked, they attacked.

  • @remigiopalamini8378
    @remigiopalamini8378 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    Complimenti alla grande federazione Russa
    Complimenti alla grande Marina Russa
    Complimenti alla grande Reonatica Russa
    Complimenti alla grande popolazione Russa un popolo dei migliori con grande capacità e umiltà vera
    Complimenti al grande Esercito Rosso Z
    Complimenti al grande Presidente Putin il numero uno su questa terra il Dio del mondo intero
    Il grande migliore Presidente e unico su questa terra con grande capacità e umiltà vera
    Unico sulla terra

  • @sid31663
    @sid31663 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Damn i dont want to be on the receiving end of it 😮

  • @ffkll8087
    @ffkll8087 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    i think it's highly accurate,saw a video where two uragan mlrs in kharkiv near a mall which hit by iskander..

  • @usmanladan1515
    @usmanladan1515 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    You want to know what we think about the Iskandar missile? We dont want to think or say anything about it. It is a scary weapon.

  • @Shahbaz-Ali2k2
    @Shahbaz-Ali2k2 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Design is very awsm

  • @calanbennett6817
    @calanbennett6817 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    The Iskander 9M723 / 9M729 missiles are only used for targets from 200 to 500kms due to its cost and scarcity (even in 2024, only 38units/month are produced). The most heavily used missiles are the smaller M542 and M544 both only 300mm diameter but use the same guidance system as 9M7 series with range of only 70-220kms. Current production is around 120 units of M5 series per month. This is why Ukraine is running low on surface to air missiles. NATO is not keeping up with Russia in supply of Patriot type missiles. Ukraine will soon have huge losses.

  • @iktita
    @iktita 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Iskander kick ass

  • @johnnewman1483
    @johnnewman1483 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Also it's accuracy has been proven to be one meter😂

  • @almasseven5665
    @almasseven5665 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Lovely Iskander

  • @ilijaspasojevic7031
    @ilijaspasojevic7031 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Iskander is a variant of the name Alexander in cultures such as Iran (Persia), Arabia and others throughout the Middle East, Caucasus and Central Asia. In Egypt, its bearers are mostly of Christian (Coptic) descent. Originally referring to Alexander the Great. That's why I think it's fantastic that this excellent rocket has that name. Because it mostly refers to a great military leader, one of the greatest in history, and because its name connects a multitude of cultures that live both in Russia itself and in the regions next to Russia. Perhaps the very thought of naming a weapon is foreign and disgusting to some, since weapons are used to kill, on the other hand, we live in a violent world. And in a violent world, we unfortunately still need weapons. P.S. Well, if that's the case, at least it should have a nice name, if it "must" exist..

  • @pierredjoh9941
    @pierredjoh9941 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Magnifique

  • @paulevans4905
    @paulevans4905 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Getting more accurate every day with field testing.

  • @1rumplestiltskin1
    @1rumplestiltskin1 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    the Americans have lost at least 4 PATRIOT SYSTEMS, one of which was given to the UKEs from Sweden at America's instructions.

  • @RomaanDennis-gv7jc
    @RomaanDennis-gv7jc 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +15

    Russia has right to defence its self against terrorism

  • @yie1918
    @yie1918 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +19

    ☠️🔥☠️ uuraa uuuuraaaa

  • @GraditelMacedonia
    @GraditelMacedonia 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    You forgot Tocka - U.

    • @wallingnaga6563
      @wallingnaga6563 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Tocka-U is the older missile system

    • @user-zk2hl9ib9u
      @user-zk2hl9ib9u 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      точка старая система

    • @derraincorporation5586
      @derraincorporation5586 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@wallingnaga6563now it is Tos M-2

    • @wallingnaga6563
      @wallingnaga6563 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@derraincorporation5586
      TOS is a different system mate!!

  • @nandanap9225
    @nandanap9225 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    They better make mockups of these weapons and up its range.

  • @jurajkovacik2430
    @jurajkovacik2430 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    but how about difference to kindzal?

  • @gastonsaintpaul5590
    @gastonsaintpaul5590 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very effective & deadly piece weapon.

  • @globalterroil3208
    @globalterroil3208 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Well written script. Congrats.

  • @chiribimchiribom6864
    @chiribimchiribom6864 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You smart preffered to avoid a fact that Isander missiles also can be intercepted, although it is a not simple task, of course.

  • @ivotomicic4471
    @ivotomicic4471 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    korrekt, ein paar auf Berlin !.

  • @saleemkirmani5583
    @saleemkirmani5583 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    If it has strong counter electronic jamming and MARV capability, then it can be effective, especially if it can be used at night and in adverse weather conditions. It's hard to know how good it is.

    • @user-kf9ve2nb5m
      @user-kf9ve2nb5m 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Можешь спросить у польских военных которых вчера накрыли в Харькове. Конечно у тех кто остался жив.

    • @user-zk2hl9ib9u
      @user-zk2hl9ib9u 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      без разницы-их как-раз ночью и запускают

    • @najiv8797
      @najiv8797 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its not that hard... After this conflict ended and if you saw many countries want to buy these big shovels.. That shit legit. Tho I doubt Russia will mass prodice it for other nations.

  • @gino3286
    @gino3286 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    a monthly production of 30 units is not that much
    i wonder if there is a shortage of some components that is slowing down production

  • @vinnievalentine421
    @vinnievalentine421 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Macron is waiting for one

  • @sidiray9269
    @sidiray9269 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    Western propaganda media told us all that Russia did not have any missile left fore years and they still delusional 😊😂😂😂😂😂 Good luck nato

    • @hansolo1571
      @hansolo1571 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      As long as it is Ukranians testing that theory there is no harm for them to say such things.

  • @zksstalstawidlo9015
    @zksstalstawidlo9015 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice

  • @edwardcarberry1095
    @edwardcarberry1095 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It is thus obvious then not to park any equipment near enough that two can be destroyed.

  • @waltertowery3234
    @waltertowery3234 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's a sound weapon system

  • @kadyrov3218
    @kadyrov3218 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    We love the Iskander

  • @pernykvist3442
    @pernykvist3442 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Their is no susch thing as a "Tactical" nukes.

  • @JoseLopez-mc7kw
    @JoseLopez-mc7kw 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    potent iskader communincation intellegence quest but one too intellently complicate it

  • @clippers4me
    @clippers4me 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Here is the thing. I don't care how powerful or destructive any missiles are but the main thing is, can it be shot down. There's no point in having missiles if they can be intercepted and shot down. This should be a priority in every missile development.

    • @macpj12j
      @macpj12j วันที่ผ่านมา

      isklander have not been intercept in the entire war it been pentrating partroits , arrow and other air defenses it can be intercepted but its hard

  • @deshappriyangawijeratne1273
    @deshappriyangawijeratne1273 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    this missile can will make last minit near target engine off and transfer glid bomb then can save missile defence syestem

  • @ciumtangan4935
    @ciumtangan4935 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    ..whoaao..😲😲

  • @mikei7498
    @mikei7498 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Beltway battery

  • @user-sf6bq2gn4h
    @user-sf6bq2gn4h 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

    Russia with the best weapons on planet earth.

    • @itsmoot2879
      @itsmoot2879 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      how would you know, being a keyboard know-it-all. there are tons of weapons that you have no idea the usa owns

  • @7subba
    @7subba 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is one the best weapons of Russia but Russians have a lot of more other weapons.

  • @cokrlicix
    @cokrlicix 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's not true that those Patriots were the first ones taken out. Last year in Kiev first Patriot was taken out with a Kinzhal missile,
    someone recorded a viral video that night of 32 Patriot missiles being fired in 30 seconds.

  • @moderate1452
    @moderate1452 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    lol - Iskander does not comply with current ESG and DEI guidelines - therefore it is superb.

  • @doctorjivago5081
    @doctorjivago5081 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Красавица!

  • @rockval.1061
    @rockval.1061 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Esta arma sera el terror de la OTAN 😅😂😂 pobres franceses.

  • @joni8090
    @joni8090 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bravo Ruussiiaa 🇷🇺 🎖️ 🇷🇺
    UUURRRAA 🙏

  • @h3w45
    @h3w45 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Flying shovels

  • @rajkumar-qf3fk
    @rajkumar-qf3fk 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    1 meter

  • @tontosilver6578
    @tontosilver6578 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Russia 🇷🇺 💪🏻

  • @tamonniangti2468
    @tamonniangti2468 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why the Russian not used brahmos missili.

  • @sickotwist9802
    @sickotwist9802 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    My thoughts Russia winning competition of development and deployment not to mention production also! I did mention! Ofcourse It's never-ending competition!

  • @danpetrescu4915
    @danpetrescu4915 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    accuracy . then why exist military and official building in kiev ? and why block of flats whit CIVILIAN ar hit?

  • @iliaartemov2748
    @iliaartemov2748 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Vivat Kolomna!!! My litle native town 800 years old. Now it's main product - the threat for whole Nato criminals!!!

  • @samsochi2258
    @samsochi2258 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    And new: Iskander K

  • @davidrickwood5588
    @davidrickwood5588 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Where are the T14 Armata wonder tanks??

    • @dcahodl
      @dcahodl 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They're are still being tested with the latest update that the engine block issues have been resolved. I wouldn't be surprised if we get to see some limited deployment of them in this conflict.

  • @husseinhussein142
    @husseinhussein142 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Iskander systems are effective, but the Russians must produce copies of this system 750km - 1000-1500km. The Short and Medium Missile Treaty greatly harmed Russian missile capabilities.

  • @ganie1961
    @ganie1961 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    It is not scary, needs to be more pointy

  • @shack3609
    @shack3609 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Bye bye america patric square pants system 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @ziauddin7948
    @ziauddin7948 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    if Russia proceeds to advance its Iskandar missile technology & increase its target distance to 10,000 Km then Russia will possess capability to strike at US , UK , France & Germany military tragets # 🇵🇰

    • @user-sh8vv4fj8w
      @user-sh8vv4fj8w 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Нет необходимости, посмотрите ракету Сармат Sarmat. 18 000 km

    • @mikedeutsch7723
      @mikedeutsch7723 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Russia has had ICBMS for decades. They've had that technology for a long time.

    • @user-bd7gv4ff2q
      @user-bd7gv4ff2q 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Я вам открою секрет 😁 посмотрите в ютубе Буревестник ракета она вас сильно удивит 😁 у неё нету дальности она расчитана на месяцы полётов у неё ядерный двигатель

    • @Sevastopol91
      @Sevastopol91 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Lol, Russian Sarmat missile has a 18,000+ km range. When was the last time your brain got updated?

  • @wdonwelton
    @wdonwelton 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Don't ask a Russian about the accuracy of this missile, if you want to get the truth about the missiles capabilities.

  • @ChrisLloyd-zf7nl
    @ChrisLloyd-zf7nl 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Islander m is most

  • @ErictheAss
    @ErictheAss 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Russia is extremely unpredictable....

  • @donduv4332
    @donduv4332 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Why usa can't find oil in Russia 😂😂😂

  • @bigbossmanian1876
    @bigbossmanian1876 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    And they say russia is weak 😂

  • @johnnydoe3603
    @johnnydoe3603 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This Video Stopped making Sense when you said that it Out a Patriot System given how the System is Spread Out with a Launcher, Control System and Radar on Different Vehicles. 🤪

    • @bobbyfresh5415
      @bobbyfresh5415 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yup it did. It wasn't just one iskander

    • @johnnydoe3603
      @johnnydoe3603 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@bobbyfresh5415Yet to See the
      Proof given how much Russians Lie.
      Need to see a Damaged Radar,
      Damaged Launchers and also
      a Damaged Command Center. 😂

  • @VLADDD-THE-SANCTIONS-IMPALER
    @VLADDD-THE-SANCTIONS-IMPALER 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Named after Alexander the Great
    No chance for patriots