This is kind of propaganda - to emphasize and suggest, that the Russians couldn't do anything good by theirself, but they must to lie on Soviet's achievements...
I remember nato countries saying russia would run out of missiles The Islander particularly seems to be growing in trees and it is so deadly it feels wrong
Chould be true, after terror attack he is legit target and russia is looking for him. But we need confirmation first, these rumours has been around earlier too
Отличие французских военных НАТО от других военнослужащих НАТО в том, что американские, британские и польские генералы и офицерский состав умеют красиво "случайно" умереть от сердечного приступа или упасть с велосипеда в Альпах, неудачно прыгнуть с высоты в каньон или разбиться в автомобильной аварии со смертельным исходом...согласно красивым никрологам стран НАТО, а у французкого командования просто нет фантазии придумать красивую историю о их "случайной" смерти, поэтому они говорят правду о том где, как, и при каких обстоятельствах солдаты Франции умирают на украинском полигоне НАТО. Не хватает креативности и денег для того, чтобы заклеить рот родственникам погибших солдат и офицеров, чтоб они не говорили, при каких обстоятельствах погиб их близкий. А так умирают все по одной причине, нет осознания, что восточные славяне это три народа, но Отечество у них одно на всех и поэтому украинские партизаны (70% от всей Украины) будет делать всё, чтобы помочь российской армии уничтожить натовских янычар на земле наших предков.
@@Ghosy01 yep also use similar tech that's in the old Soviet anti ship missile called ship wreck the missile can communicate with each other in flight to coordinate a attack
@user-nv1zh4vk9mв Арктике правит Россия, кто теперь в Африке главный? Кто демилитаризовал блок НАТО? Кто помогает Ирану, Китаю и Северной Кореи оружием (гиперзвуковым) и обучает их офицерский состав? Кто ускоряет дедолларизацию в мире, превращая США в регионального лилипута? Кто создал продовольственный рынок хлеба в мире и держит в руках продовольствие в мире? Кто создал аналог газового ОПЕК? Кто пинком ноги открывает дверь в ОПЕК и решает, кому дать нефть, а кому нет, устанавливая цены? Кто забрал Азовское море и 28% суши Украины? Кто заработал хорошую прибыль и стал пятой экономикой мира, а в этом году станет четвертой экономикой мира, находясь под 16000 санкциями, а? Во истину, дураку не рассказывают весь задуманный план до конца, ибо он и масштаба задуманного не поймёт и сам себе что-нибудь поломает.😅 Игра гроссмейстера в шахматы не для вас, переходите к раскраскам для трёхлетних детей.
exactly! on the top of that patriot is not able to intercept almost any russian missile. maybe drone or aircraft, but russia is using guided bombs far from battle zone and patriots are deep in ukraine defense zone. and they are not able to shoot down migs in 20 km altitute anyway. patriot missiles are quite slow and short range. mig can shoot them down or fly away...
The MSM told us that Russia was running out of bullets and rockets and tanks and soldiers and that Ukraine is winning the war I think you call that propaganda 😂
Russia needed to fight with shovels because they ran out of bullets and drop washing machines from their planes because they ran out of bombs. Russia has a sense of humor.
Told the West more than 10 years ago. That fine. You put missiles in all these border countries will make missiles that your defenses cannot stop and our people laughed at him.. All those people hiding in the bunker who are dead. They ain't laughing
Nothing can. Because it maneuvers in it's terminal phase. The math involved in intercepting a maneuvering target at that speed is just too complex and there just isn't enough time. plus each time the target turns the AD system has to throw out it's last intercept calculation and start again.
Iskander is a variant of the name Alexander in cultures such as Iran (Persia), Arabia and others throughout the Middle East, Caucasus and Central Asia. In Egypt, its bearers are mostly of Christian (Coptic) descent. Originally referring to Alexander the Great. That's why I think it's fantastic that this excellent rocket has that name. Because it mostly refers to a great military leader, one of the greatest in history, and because its name connects a multitude of cultures that live both in Russia itself and in the regions next to Russia. Perhaps the very thought of naming a weapon is foreign and disgusting to some, since weapons are used to kill, on the other hand, we live in a violent world. And in a violent world, we unfortunately still need weapons. P.S. Well, if that's the case, at least it should have a nice name, if it "must" exist..
I would consider Ukrainian conflict a world war honestly. It’s collective West vs collective South. Ukraine just got convinced into using their people to test Russia’s defences on NATOs behalf , but the collective West didn’t realise that during all conflicts Russia first gets punched really hard, learns and comes back with a win. Russian military is much stronger now than it was before the war, and it has large scale combat experience (not chasing flip flop wearing beduins) and it knows how to deal with Western weapons now. The West should have been friends with Russia not enemies. Now the world is going to shit thanks to the decision makers the people of the West have elected.
I see this conflict as pointless. West has history of bombing many countries and has accepted illegal separation of Kosovo that belongs to another country. So now we are heading towards ww3 or maybe are in ww3, because Ukraine is bombed and they lost 20% of its territory? War over something that has been accepted as normal by Western standards? That seems detached from reality, and politics and media of both sides are completely opposite from one another. That is dangerous.
You don't understand how democracy works. The elected politicians are only actors who do and say what ever they are told to do and say. The decision making process is controlled by the civil servants.
The Iskander 9M723 / 9M729 missiles are only used for targets from 200 to 500kms due to its cost and scarcity (even in 2024, only 38units/month are produced). The most heavily used missiles are the smaller M542 and M544 both only 300mm diameter but use the same guidance system as 9M7 series with range of only 70-220kms. Current production is around 120 units of M5 series per month. This is why Ukraine is running low on surface to air missiles. NATO is not keeping up with Russia in supply of Patriot type missiles. Ukraine will soon have huge losses.
I like how people just brush past the fab 3000 glide missiles. They are basically Soviet era missiles. That Russia has an abundance of,with a modern attachment that helps them glide and are extremely accurate. The reason Russia hasn’t used them yet is because they are so destructive. I don’t know if they are comparable to a Moab or something less than nuclear. I know they are powerful
Well being the Russians were the first to get up into space, first to the moon, first to Venus (multiple times), first to mars (multiple times) etc etc. They have always been more than decent at Rockets, and as such made decent missiles. People like to talk shit about how bad Russians are, and yea sure, we have some better stuff, but we also have 10x the defense budget to do so in the US. *Though,* if there wasn't such bad corruption over there back in Soviet times stealing money that could of help with development even more, who knows how great they could of been over there in theses areas of rocket science and such.
Also putin was shown a video (By his own cabinet) proving that the american moon landing was fake. hahahahaha. He thought it was quite funny. It sounds like a joke but its real. I saw a video of putin being shown the proof.
Ты наверно не осведомлён всё ваше новое оружие не работает хорошо а ракеты ваши в основном 70-80-90 годов пора списывать у вас бюджет в 10 раз больше а толку нет, нет конструкторского задела а с программным обеспечением у нас всё развивается да и в системе РЭБ вы отстали лет на 20 так что не пыли по чём зря...
Вы правы , в США разработками занимаются частные компании для которых главное больше денег урвать из бюджета и у них большое лоби в конгрессе ,а в России оборонная промышленность в основном в руках государства и при меньшем бюджете есть результат.
*400km is too short to hit America from the Russian territory* anyways, except in Alaska. And it that case, the launchers would be *vulnerable to air strikes.* In fact, none of the 36 nations of the American continent, nor the dependencies of extra-continental nations on the continent of America, really felt the need to develop a weapon specifically to counter the Iskander missile, because *they didn't see it as a real threat on their territory.* *The situation in Easter and Central Europe and Asia is very different* and as *diverse* as the economic characteristics of each nation. The case of Ukraine is particularly dire because their budget was a bit small to face such a threat, and this nation never really prepared for war. They had no plans to attack anyone, were trying to have the best international relations possible, and thought that all the other nations around them, including Russia, would had much better things to do than try to destroy them at any cost. Now it's quite late to find clean and safe solutions to this (deterrent, I mean), so I expect to see dirty solutions only.
Complimenti alla grande federazione Russa Complimenti alla grande Marina Russa Complimenti alla grande Reonatica Russa Complimenti alla grande popolazione Russa un popolo dei migliori con grande capacità e umiltà vera Complimenti al grande Esercito Rosso Z Complimenti al grande Presidente Putin il numero uno su questa terra il Dio del mondo intero Il grande migliore Presidente e unico su questa terra con grande capacità e umiltà vera Unico sulla terra
was the destroyed Patriot on the move or deployed? Makes a massive difference.... actually Patriot is about as useful as a dead rat in a tampon factory if it's on the move
It's complete idiocracy to have ever thought that Ukraine was going to beat Russia. This is the type of humans that surround us. They even get to vote. Not that voting matters in any way
Taking out 2 Patriot missile systems as the video stated, is not the same as taking out two Patriot launchers. Each system is comprised of up to 8 launchers. So while taking out one quarter of a system's replaceable launchers is good for Russia--especially for propaganda--it is no where near as impactful as destroying 2 Systems. Of course destroying any air defenses is important, especially in this new style of warfare. Had the launchers been properly used as intended, further to the rear, set up ready to fire, instead of sitting there at the front for far too long, the outcome likely would have different. The Iskander seems effective at what it does, but is limited by its range.
@TacoTomtheBomb It's limited by its range only due to the short and medium range missiles agreement between the US and Russia, which now is off the table btw as far as I know. And which means that the range of newly produced missiles isn't necessarily 400-500 km anymore. But even 400-500 km is pretty much enough for Ukraine war theater. For greater ranges there are bigger better toys in Russia's arsenal, Russia can pretty much reach anything anywhere on this planet, and then some more.
@@Sevastopol91 Yeah there are a lot of weapons that haven't been used yet, probably best to keep it that way. I for one don't need to see a successful missile strike from half way around the world. Regional defensive missiles are one thing, long range ones will get us all in trouble because sooner or later someone will launch one.
NOW this is pointy! -what? I don't care if it's pointy, the shape of the missile has nothing to do with payload delivery. Are you kidding? This is what I said! You got me executed for that. -I always said it! cit. The dictator.
The ability of this weapon does not need to be commented, due to the fact that it has been proven so many times in battle that it is unnecessary to add anything more!🙋
First time taken out? Did you forget first Patriot appearance in Kiev? When it fired 32 (!) missiles trying to intercept single Dagger missile and then we saw solid fuel (patriot missiles fuel btw) burning on the ground so bright, half of the Kiev was illuminated with it. All of it on video too
It was not the first time patriot got destroyed but it was the last one they have because the other ones was destroyed by Russia using kinzhal stop the lie my friend 😂😂😁
Фантастика. «Ураган» - система залпового огня. «Искандер»- тактическая баллистическая ракета. Так что «Ураган» никак не может уничтожить «Искандер»…только собой)
Каким образом? Машина с Искандером не подходит близко к ЛБС и время на пуск максимум 5 минут. Ураган за это время даже не успеет целеуказание получить и навестись, а уж достать по расстоянию тем более не сможет!
@@nitrospeedrus why do you think it's the uragan that destroys the iskander ? the iskander destroys 2 uragan mlrs near a mall in kharkiv ,i say iskander highly or very accurate,there is a video of that...the uragan can't even reach the iskander so no way it can destroy it..the google translator are making you think the opposite .
@@starikanleks3198 i know the difference of the two..my statement is the iskander is very/highly accurate(it is a precision guided) and destroy/hit 2 uragan near a mall in kharkiv (there is a video of this)what my statement says? the google translator messing you up..
My thoughts Russia winning competition of development and deployment not to mention production also! I did mention! Ofcourse It's never-ending competition!
I can’t understand. On the video intro it is indicated that the warhead can contain several types of weapons (cluster, nuclear, high-explosive, etc.). Can this be carried out simultaneously in one missile or do you need to choose one type of ammunition?
В каждой ракете своя боеголовка,в зависимости от цели. Термобарическая - для уничтожение живой силы в казармах,ядерная - для уничтожение и живой и неживой силы в местах скопления.
If it has strong counter electronic jamming and MARV capability, then it can be effective, especially if it can be used at night and in adverse weather conditions. It's hard to know how good it is.
Its not that hard... After this conflict ended and if you saw many countries want to buy these big shovels.. That shit legit. Tho I doubt Russia will mass prodice it for other nations.
Iskander systems are effective, but the Russians must produce copies of this system 750km - 1000-1500km. The Short and Medium Missile Treaty greatly harmed Russian missile capabilities.
Bloody awesome weaponry from Russia 🇷🇺, from Australia 🦘
I don’t understand why people keep trying to use “the Soviet” era derogatorily. The Abraham’s and F16 both date from the Soviet era.
Because Western propagandistic media says everything Soviet was bad quality or poor 🤡
80% of all US weapons were made when the Soviet Union was still a country.
👆🏽
Искандер разработан уже в России в СССР была система Ока которая попала под договор о сокращении вооружения ,а именно ракет средней дальности .
This is kind of propaganda - to emphasize and suggest, that the Russians couldn't do anything good by theirself, but they must to lie on Soviet's achievements...
I remember nato countries saying russia would run out of missiles
The Islander particularly seems to be growing in trees and it is so deadly it feels wrong
It is both, funny and disturbing to see how stupid is nato propaganda, and that milions of people still believe in it.
For sure, you run out neuronal cells.
Well I suppose when your defens industry is not solely based on profit margins, some lethal stuff can almost grow on trees?😮
It's just like shovel
Russia has the most advance missile system in the world.
According to unconfirmed reports, Bugdanov was reportedly killed in a missile strike today. So, the Iskandars are deadly!
Source please
Chould be true, after terror attack he is legit target and russia is looking for him. But we need confirmation first, these rumours has been around earlier too
@@chewpchewp9670 Remember, I've stated unconfirmed!
In my country, the word for "fool" is "budala". So we just call him Budalov.
And four f-16s
I suggest to ask those french soldiers in Slavyansk, how accurate Iskander is. Not sure they would be there to answer though.
Exactly heard that the survivors ran away 😂
The survivors are back in France. They dont want that smoke. 😂
Отличие французских военных НАТО от других военнослужащих НАТО в том, что американские, британские и польские генералы и офицерский состав умеют красиво "случайно" умереть от сердечного приступа или упасть с велосипеда в Альпах, неудачно прыгнуть с высоты в каньон или разбиться в автомобильной аварии со смертельным исходом...согласно красивым никрологам стран НАТО, а у французкого командования просто нет фантазии придумать красивую историю о их "случайной" смерти, поэтому они говорят правду о том где, как, и при каких обстоятельствах солдаты Франции умирают на украинском полигоне НАТО. Не хватает креативности и денег для того, чтобы заклеить рот родственникам погибших солдат и офицеров, чтоб они не говорили, при каких обстоятельствах погиб их близкий. А так умирают все по одной причине, нет осознания, что восточные славяне это три народа, но Отечество у них одно на всех и поэтому украинские партизаны (70% от всей Украины) будет делать всё, чтобы помочь российской армии уничтожить натовских янычар на земле наших предков.
@@wallingnaga6563 Yep, they ran away, their legs one way, their head and body another🤣
😂😂😂 @@wallingnaga6563
New version has 1000km range when fired with a 500kg war head
new version with a fab 500 . i like that
@@Ghosy01 yep also use similar tech that's in the old Soviet anti ship missile called ship wreck the missile can communicate with each other in flight to coordinate a attack
🤣🤣
@@Ghosy01 and fab 3000
Ukraine will have THE NEPTUNE ready by 2025 same distance 1000
Damn, i have never seen a shovel that big can fly. 💀
Russian shovel is the best weaponry
Has been almost 3 years and I haven’t seen any of interceptions Ukraine claimed
@user-nv1zh4vk9m I saw some shovels, but they looked like Soviet era models.
@user-nv1zh4vk9m Video about Iskander missiles and you talk about decisive victory cope harder
@user-nv1zh4vk9m
Ukraine also said that they will be having tea on the coast of Crimea by fall 2023 where is it ?
@user-nv1zh4vk9mв Арктике правит Россия, кто теперь в Африке главный? Кто демилитаризовал блок НАТО? Кто помогает Ирану, Китаю и Северной Кореи оружием (гиперзвуковым) и обучает их офицерский состав? Кто ускоряет дедолларизацию в мире, превращая США в регионального лилипута? Кто создал продовольственный рынок хлеба в мире и держит в руках продовольствие в мире? Кто создал аналог газового ОПЕК? Кто пинком ноги открывает дверь в ОПЕК и решает, кому дать нефть, а кому нет, устанавливая цены? Кто забрал Азовское море и 28% суши Украины? Кто заработал хорошую прибыль и стал пятой экономикой мира, а в этом году станет четвертой экономикой мира, находясь под 16000 санкциями, а? Во истину, дураку не рассказывают весь задуманный план до конца, ибо он и масштаба задуманного не поймёт и сам себе что-нибудь поломает.😅 Игра гроссмейстера в шахматы не для вас, переходите к раскраскам для трёхлетних детей.
@user-nv1zh4vk9m Бро за 30 лет в Афганистане я не видел победы Америки над талибами а они даже не регулярная армия😊...
It wasn't the first Patriot missile system it was the last Patriot missile system because they're all gone now😂😂
остался один-его вчера передала германия
exactly! on the top of that patriot is not able to intercept almost any russian missile. maybe drone or aircraft, but russia is using guided bombs far from battle zone and patriots are deep in ukraine defense zone. and they are not able to shoot down migs in 20 km altitute anyway. patriot missiles are quite slow and short range. mig can shoot them down or fly away...
According to rumors, a few more arrived in Kyiv, not sure how many tho, and a couple has already been deleted, lol
point ..
@@kingnorlen You realize that these AD systems don't grow on trees right. Every one of them we send leaves our airspace that much more vulnerable.
Iskander is no joke
it's a bullshit
Lol
@@Loutchos must be a Ukrainian in denial
@@Loutchos bullshit-These are your Patriots, Abrams and Leopards, just like you!
The MSM told us that Russia was running out of bullets and rockets and tanks and soldiers and that Ukraine is winning the war I think you call that propaganda 😂
Russia needed to fight with shovels because they ran out of bullets and drop washing machines from their planes because they ran out of bombs. Russia has a sense of humor.
@goulddddable very very stupid coment. U must have a frozen brain like joe biden 😅😅😅😅
Наша детка "Искандер" очень бесстрашный и горячий мальчик. Никогда не дает в обиду девочек России.❤
😂 I like that
классно написали
Сестра женщинам тут не место,, почему вы наши женщины суйте свой нос где не надо,,,
Do you really want to know how accurate the Iskander is?
Putin would say "f*** around and find out.
Told the West more than 10 years ago. That fine. You put missiles in all these border countries will make missiles that your defenses cannot stop and our people laughed at him.. All those people hiding in the bunker who are dead. They ain't laughing
The Patriot systems can not stop the Iskander. Period.
Nothing can. Because it maneuvers in it's terminal phase. The math involved in intercepting a maneuvering target at that speed is just too complex and there just isn't enough time. plus each time the target turns the AD system has to throw out it's last intercept calculation and start again.
Starts saying, it's effective.
Then says, is it really that effective??????? XD
This Chat GPT Content farm is getting pretty ridiculous lately.
Iskander is a variant of the name Alexander in cultures such as Iran (Persia), Arabia and others throughout the Middle East, Caucasus and Central Asia. In Egypt, its bearers are mostly of Christian (Coptic) descent. Originally referring to Alexander the Great. That's why I think it's fantastic that this excellent rocket has that name. Because it mostly refers to a great military leader, one of the greatest in history, and because its name connects a multitude of cultures that live both in Russia itself and in the regions next to Russia. Perhaps the very thought of naming a weapon is foreign and disgusting to some, since weapons are used to kill, on the other hand, we live in a violent world. And in a violent world, we unfortunately still need weapons. P.S. Well, if that's the case, at least it should have a nice name, if it "must" exist..
I would consider Ukrainian conflict a world war honestly. It’s collective West vs collective South. Ukraine just got convinced into using their people to test Russia’s defences on NATOs behalf , but the collective West didn’t realise that during all conflicts Russia first gets punched really hard, learns and comes back with a win. Russian military is much stronger now than it was before the war, and it has large scale combat experience (not chasing flip flop wearing beduins) and it knows how to deal with Western weapons now. The West should have been friends with Russia not enemies. Now the world is going to shit thanks to the decision makers the people of the West have elected.
Totally agree..
I see this conflict as pointless. West has history of bombing many countries and has accepted illegal separation of Kosovo that belongs to another country. So now we are heading towards ww3 or maybe are in ww3, because Ukraine is bombed and they lost 20% of its territory? War over something that has been accepted as normal by Western standards? That seems detached from reality, and politics and media of both sides are completely opposite from one another. That is dangerous.
True
You don't understand how democracy works. The elected politicians are only actors who do and say what ever they are told to do and say. The decision making process is controlled by the civil servants.
Agree. The West has chosen corrupt & mentally incapable men to lead their countries.
From the videos showing the Iskander missile strikes, it is very accurate
That was a scary strike though. 500kg warhead is little too overkill.
Putin is an expert in video.
But but but celenskyy said they intercepted one using a targeted building 🤡🤡🤡
Well that Patriot system took it out, by being hit. So, I agree, it is just a matter of perspective.
😂😂😂😂😂 you guys have scary jokes 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@veritasliberabitvos454if you belive in your own Lies iq 12 garbage
Western propaganda media told us all that Russia did not have any missile left fore years and they still delusional 😊😂😂😂😂😂 Good luck nato
As long as it is Ukranians testing that theory there is no harm for them to say such things.
The Iskander 9M723 / 9M729 missiles are only used for targets from 200 to 500kms due to its cost and scarcity (even in 2024, only 38units/month are produced). The most heavily used missiles are the smaller M542 and M544 both only 300mm diameter but use the same guidance system as 9M7 series with range of only 70-220kms. Current production is around 120 units of M5 series per month. This is why Ukraine is running low on surface to air missiles. NATO is not keeping up with Russia in supply of Patriot type missiles. Ukraine will soon have huge losses.
I like how people just brush past the fab 3000 glide missiles. They are basically Soviet era missiles. That Russia has an abundance of,with a modern attachment that helps them glide and are extremely accurate. The reason Russia hasn’t used them yet is because they are so destructive. I don’t know if they are comparable to a Moab or something less than nuclear. I know they are powerful
Бережем для высокопоставленных и уважаемых гостей с "запада"
What u smoking ?😂
They are dropping the fab 500 as of recent and that alone is quite a huge bomb
Oh those shovels are terrifying.
Islander is one of if not the best missile system in the world
Iskander missile is a military masterpiece. 🤓
Well being the Russians were the first to get up into space, first to the moon, first to Venus (multiple times), first to mars (multiple times) etc etc.
They have always been more than decent at Rockets, and as such made decent missiles. People like to talk shit about how bad Russians are, and yea sure, we have some better stuff, but we also have 10x the defense budget to do so in the US.
*Though,* if there wasn't such bad corruption over there back in Soviet times stealing money that could of help with development even more, who knows how great they could of been over there in theses areas of rocket science and such.
Also putin was shown a video (By his own cabinet) proving that the american moon landing was fake. hahahahaha. He thought it was quite funny. It sounds like a joke but its real. I saw a video of putin being shown the proof.
Ты наверно не осведомлён всё ваше новое оружие не работает хорошо а ракеты ваши в основном 70-80-90 годов пора списывать у вас бюджет в 10 раз больше а толку нет, нет конструкторского задела а с программным обеспечением у нас всё развивается да и в системе РЭБ вы отстали лет на 20 так что не пыли по чём зря...
Вы правы , в США разработками занимаются частные компании для которых главное больше денег урвать из бюджета и у них большое лоби в конгрессе ,а в России оборонная промышленность в основном в руках государства и при меньшем бюджете есть результат.
@@rgw5991да эту тему мусолят уже давно.
Just imagine, nobody does it better now
You want to know what we think about the Iskandar missile? We dont want to think or say anything about it. It is a scary weapon.
Superb capabilities!!!
the Americans have lost at least 4 PATRIOT SYSTEMS, one of which was given to the UKEs from Sweden at America's instructions.
if anyone misheard ..its MACH 6-7 not MACH 67
67 mach could reach the America in minutea 😂
I noticed it too
It's 9 mach bro
America can’t match it with their old missiles
less copium ivan, all your lies dont change the reality. Did you learn nothing from the collapse of the USSR?
America has prsm Precision strike missile
*400km is too short to hit America from the Russian territory* anyways, except in Alaska. And it that case, the launchers would be *vulnerable to air strikes.*
In fact, none of the 36 nations of the American continent, nor the dependencies of extra-continental nations on the continent of America, really felt the need to develop a weapon specifically to counter the Iskander missile, because *they didn't see it as a real threat on their territory.*
*The situation in Easter and Central Europe and Asia is very different* and as *diverse* as the economic characteristics of each nation. The case of Ukraine is particularly dire because their budget was a bit small to face such a threat, and this nation never really prepared for war. They had no plans to attack anyone, were trying to have the best international relations possible, and thought that all the other nations around them, including Russia, would had much better things to do than try to destroy them at any cost. Now it's quite late to find clean and safe solutions to this (deterrent, I mean), so I expect to see dirty solutions only.
US missiles are just as good. The problem is that Americans are convinced that nobody else can make decent missiles.
@@mrbigberd They are not as good . All subsonic and the tomahawk is an antique . Production of them is also tiny compared to Russia
Complimenti alla grande federazione Russa
Complimenti alla grande Marina Russa
Complimenti alla grande Reonatica Russa
Complimenti alla grande popolazione Russa un popolo dei migliori con grande capacità e umiltà vera
Complimenti al grande Esercito Rosso Z
Complimenti al grande Presidente Putin il numero uno su questa terra il Dio del mondo intero
Il grande migliore Presidente e unico su questa terra con grande capacità e umiltà vera
Unico sulla terra
was the destroyed Patriot on the move or deployed? Makes a massive difference.... actually Patriot is about as useful as a dead rat in a tampon factory if it's on the move
I think they followed the convoy, when they parked, they attacked.
It's complete idiocracy to have ever thought that Ukraine was going to beat Russia. This is the type of humans that surround us. They even get to vote. Not that voting matters in any way
They done it again at Poltava 😊😊😊😊
They call it the Sniper
Formidable and pinpoint accurate projectile. NATO obviously tried to discredit it, but failed in their attempts.
Iskander missile: The Himars destroyer.
It destroyed 3 Himars in Sumy recently
The Himars killer, the General sniper. The Iskander has quite a reputation.
WHERE AREY GONE HIMARS 😮😮
US fanboys really quiet 😂😂😂
Taking out a patriot defense system WHILE BEING TRANSPORTED ISN'T REALLY AN ACHIEVEMENT
Taking out 2 Patriot missile systems as the video stated, is not the same as taking out two Patriot launchers. Each system is comprised of up to 8 launchers. So while taking out one quarter of a system's replaceable launchers is good for Russia--especially for propaganda--it is no where near as impactful as destroying 2 Systems. Of course destroying any air defenses is important, especially in this new style of warfare. Had the launchers been properly used as intended, further to the rear, set up ready to fire, instead of sitting there at the front for far too long, the outcome likely would have different. The Iskander seems effective at what it does, but is limited by its range.
@@TacoTomtheBomb😂
@TacoTomtheBomb
It's limited by its range only due to the short and medium range missiles agreement between the US and Russia, which now is off the table btw as far as I know. And which means that the range of newly produced missiles isn't necessarily 400-500 km anymore. But even 400-500 km is pretty much enough for Ukraine war theater. For greater ranges there are bigger better toys in Russia's arsenal, Russia can pretty much reach anything anywhere on this planet, and then some more.
@@Sevastopol91 Yeah there are a lot of weapons that haven't been used yet, probably best to keep it that way. I for one don't need to see a successful missile strike from half way around the world. Regional defensive missiles are one thing, long range ones will get us all in trouble because sooner or later someone will launch one.
Mighty Russians 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🤲🏽🙂↔️
NOW this is pointy!
-what? I don't care if it's pointy, the shape of the missile has nothing to do with payload delivery.
Are you kidding? This is what I said! You got me executed for that.
-I always said it!
cit. The dictator.
Are you OK there, buddy? Do you need me to send you help? *Nod ur head and blink one time for* _Yes!_
@@WhatLiesAwaitUS
@@WhatLiesAwaitUS Aladeen Efawadh (Sacha Baron Cohen) - The Dictator
"I don't want my rocket to look like a dildo!"
@@VGYugo Haffaz aladeen son of Omar aladeen. Efawahad is the double (wink wink) and motzi the little goat.
Lovely Iskander
Russia with the best weapons on planet earth.
ISKANDER also know as "The shovel"
Also it's accuracy has been proven to be one meter😂
Himars has been taken down, but no Iskander or even tornado missile taken down 😂
Some body said and l love it, quote 'this is the shovel era".😂😂😂😂😂😂
The accuracy of Iskander missiles is sufficient. And that's the answer. Thank you.
No Russia
No world 😍
Iskander - peace personified. Double tap - double peace.
Judging by the hits (thermal targets), the accuracy of these missiles is extremely high.
The ability of this weapon does not need to be commented, due to the fact that it has been proven so many times in battle that it is unnecessary to add anything more!🙋
Design is very awsm
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Iskander cannot be intercepted by any western missile defense systems, to date. And likely to remain so in the foreseeable future.
Damn i dont want to be on the receiving end of it 😮
Russia has only shovels, what miisiles are you talking about???
First time taken out?
Did you forget first Patriot appearance in Kiev? When it fired 32 (!) missiles trying to intercept single Dagger missile and then we saw solid fuel (patriot missiles fuel btw) burning on the ground so bright, half of the Kiev was illuminated with it. All of it on video too
nice
We love the Iskander
Iskander been eating up Himars and patriots missiles defense systems like hot cakes
The best weapon,never get destroyed by any weapon.
Iskander kick ass
Bro I haven’t seen an alert on your channel in MONTHS , WTF !!
I know this is your Real reporter !
❤
TH-cam algorithms do this on purpose. they hide that new videos are coming out and do not show these videos to anyone in top search
My thoughts…is that the Russians are fighting smarter and smarter..
You forgot Tocka - U.
Tocka-U is the older missile system
точка старая система
@@wallingnaga6563now it is Tos M-2
@@derraincorporation5586
TOS is a different system mate!!
Attack on train station at Kramatorsk done by the Ukraine, because Ukraine still use Tochka-U missile system...
This is one the best weapons of Russia but Russians have a lot of more other weapons.
It was not the first time patriot got destroyed but it was the last one they have because the other ones was destroyed by Russia using kinzhal stop the lie my friend 😂😂😁
Like my X,It's was my first time!
Again 😅
Bravo Ruussiiaa 🇷🇺 🎖️ 🇷🇺
UUURRRAA 🙏
Why is this Missile so accurate?
Esta arma sera el terror de la OTAN 😅😂😂 pobres franceses.
😂😂😂👍🇷🇺🖖🤣
that ending caught me off-guard
Моего сына зовут Искандер от имени Александра Македонского но я никому не говорю что назвал его в честь ракетной установки 😂😂😂
korrekt, ein paar auf Berlin !.
Macron is waiting for one
Это далеко не первые 2 комплекса "Пэтриот"... Слабый - это тот, кто не может признавать неудачи...
i think it's highly accurate,saw a video where two uragan mlrs in kharkiv near a mall which hit by iskander..
Фантастика. «Ураган» - система залпового огня. «Искандер»- тактическая баллистическая ракета. Так что «Ураган» никак не может уничтожить «Искандер»…только собой)
Каким образом?
Машина с Искандером не подходит близко к ЛБС и время на пуск максимум 5 минут.
Ураган за это время даже не успеет целеуказание получить и навестись, а уж достать по расстоянию тем более не сможет!
@@nitrospeedrus why do you think it's the uragan that destroys the iskander ? the iskander destroys 2 uragan mlrs near a mall in kharkiv ,i say iskander highly or very accurate,there is a video of that...the uragan can't even reach the iskander so no way it can destroy it..the google translator are making you think the opposite .
Ураган,это артилерия бро🤣 искандер это балистичекая ракета,
@@starikanleks3198 i know the difference of the two..my statement is the iskander is very/highly accurate(it is a precision guided) and destroy/hit 2 uragan near a mall in kharkiv (there is a video of this)what my statement says?
the google translator messing you up..
Magnifique
pretty fuckin accurate
Its a TBM with the design spec of a MRBM. You can understand why its powerful.
Vivat Kolomna!!! My litle native town 800 years old. Now it's main product - the threat for whole Nato criminals!!!
Getting more accurate every day with field testing.
this missile can will make last minit near target engine off and transfer glid bomb then can save missile defence syestem
My thoughts Russia winning competition of development and deployment not to mention production also! I did mention! Ofcourse It's never-ending competition!
Flying shovels
☠️🔥☠️ uuraa uuuuraaaa
Still need decoy to fly with main missiles
I can’t understand. On the video intro it is indicated that the warhead can contain several types of weapons (cluster, nuclear, high-explosive, etc.). Can this be carried out simultaneously in one missile or do you need to choose one type of ammunition?
В каждой ракете своя боеголовка,в зависимости от цели. Термобарическая - для уничтожение живой силы в казармах,ядерная - для уничтожение и живой и неживой силы в местах скопления.
the warhead is selected for a specific target. one of these options
If it has strong counter electronic jamming and MARV capability, then it can be effective, especially if it can be used at night and in adverse weather conditions. It's hard to know how good it is.
Можешь спросить у польских военных которых вчера накрыли в Харькове. Конечно у тех кто остался жив.
без разницы-их как-раз ночью и запускают
Its not that hard... After this conflict ended and if you saw many countries want to buy these big shovels.. That shit legit. Tho I doubt Russia will mass prodice it for other nations.
Well written script. Congrats.
They better make mockups of these weapons and up its range.
Iskander systems are effective, but the Russians must produce copies of this system 750km - 1000-1500km. The Short and Medium Missile Treaty greatly harmed Russian missile capabilities.
When launched from Air it does go beyond 1000km. Air launched version of *Iskander* is called *Kinzhal*
Bye bye america patric square pants system 😂😂😂😂😂
Defence is Russian speciality.
Proven always.
In the 1991 Gulf war, Patriot didn't kill a single SCUD.
The M-270s given to Ukraine can also launch 2 theater ballistic missiles. The ATACMS.
Anybody knows the name of the music in 0:30?
Russia wasn't Peace, Zelensky want us to believe that he is winning ☠️
Does the video of top 5 Russia air defense is disappeared?