Similar taste actually. Both for peeps who like a slightly bright, lively, shimmery sound. The Klipsh are more straightfoward and focused. The M.A.'s are a touch sweeter and more colored in the mids, and the have a larger but slightly blury soundstage. They are both kind of fun to listen to sometimes, but neither sounds extremely natural.
THANK YOU For doing this with heavy, aggressive rock music. That's my primary taste and so many of these types of videos use jazz and acoustic music. Impossible to judge
Preferred the MA's for the first song, but didn't like either for the second. We own a pair of the Bronze 100's, and there are some songs that just don't quite sound right, but others sound amazing.
I find them both irritating to listen to. No need to shout to impress, where I find the Klipsch much more worse being bright and in your face. I get the picture trying to imitate some sort of 'live performance', but projecting raw sound at your eyeballs is, imo, always a lesser idea. Anyway, thank you again E Project for this shootout 💪
Both Rocks!! For their price are excellent!! Klipsh on the fast part of song #2 excells!!! Dynamics are great as well and it doesnt seem to harden the sound …..but that V shape…..anyway for audiophiles might not be the right one…..MA is very detailed clean with better mids (klipsh dont have any)…..bands and singers are in-front of you close and center…….with klipsh music is coming from behind the system…..but its more punchy You should try pairing both with Rotel and Nad……..Cambridge cax81 would be interesting match also!
First song - Monitor Audio win. More wide and natural sound stage. Klipsch is too narrow and straightforward. Second song - Klipsch win. Cons became pros. Straight and intense sound. Very good kick. However, Monitor Audio is too wide and scattered, unorganized. So, pick of taste then.
Both are similar tastes with treble boost, but RP600M is way harsher. There is also a higher-mid dip with RP600M. Bronze 100 is significantly better and more balanced with smoother frequency response.
I never really know how these sound battles show anything, surly the recording and playback systems degrade and alter the sound far too much, they sound completely different through my different headphones. (I don't mean to hate on the creator too much they've obviously put in a lot of effort, but I mean the "sound offs" as a general). I wanna get hold of the klipsch for an audition as they do look pretty cool, would possibly use them for a gaming setup, they are maybe a little expensive in the UK (around 3x the bronze), I got my Monitor audio Gold 100's for the same retail price of the klipsch so would like to compare them.
Many would describe the MA as a warmer sounding speaker. Maybe slightly sweeter. To me it sounds like a curtain is hanging in front of it. Detail and accuracy are muddied up. Klipsch a 1000 times better!!
The Bronze is an upgrade to the 600M for those who wants to take a step nearer towards hi fidelity while still requiring a bright sound. I would personally steer clear of both as I cant stand anything boosted. Not even for movies. Neutrality and balance are king.
Great comparison. Like your channel. Not exactly the best musical themes in my opinion...maybe Blackberry Smoke / Old Shoes , Allan Taylor / Color to the moon. Would be more suitable THANK YOU!!! We are waiting for new videos. Health and good luck!!!
The Bronze is much more realistic, detailed, balanced, and natural sounding, compared to the sucked out midrange and shrill treble of the Klipsch. Klipsch speakers like this are made for newbies who don't know true good sound, and are impressed by pumped up bass and treble, like a V curve on an equalizer. It calls attention to itself in the showroom on a quick audition, but at home it will become tiring very quickly. And, it sounds like you still aren't matching the levels. The Klipsch has higher sensitivity, and so will be louder with the same amp settings, so it will sound better to most listeners just because it's louder
Aparentemente los MA se defienden bastante bien en los rangos altos, pero he notado que muchos bafles de reconocidas marcas tienden a pormenorizar los sonidos de frecuencia alta y centrarse en los medios y/o graves (obviamente en la medida de sus posibilidades), lo que para mí suele ser un error ya que le quita sutileza al sonido, y lo aleja de la realidad. De todos modos los Klipsch no logran acoplar correctamente medios y graves.. bueno eso noto yo. Saludos!!!
AKG K550 Reference Headphones, I just bought 2 pairs of the MA Bronze 100's for £259 a pair UK, will be using as Surround and rear Surround, with my Denon X6700H, powered by an Emotive BasX A4 amp. The saving over the price of the Klipsch (£600+) pays for the Emotiva.
There are practically endless factors that would make these speakers sound totally different in your home. It's nearly impossible to know what they would sound like in your home. the list is too long to list. but thank you for trying.
![SOUND BATTLE - Klipsch RP600M vs Wharfedale EVO 4.2 As Expected?[Sound Comparison] Marantz PM7000N](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/uTwiOCDSWIA/mqdefault.jpg)
Prices in UK: Klipsch RP600M £675 while Monitor Audio Bronze 100 I can get for £275.
Similar taste actually. Both for peeps who like a slightly bright, lively, shimmery sound. The Klipsh are more straightfoward and focused. The M.A.'s are a touch sweeter and more colored in the mids, and the have a larger but slightly blury soundstage. They are both kind of fun to listen to sometimes, but neither sounds extremely natural.
THANK YOU For doing this with heavy, aggressive rock music. That's my primary taste and so many of these types of videos use jazz and acoustic music. Impossible to judge
Io credo che sia proprio il contrario.
As like food we all have our own taste and both these speakers sound great .
Bronze 100 sounds more open and detailed, while the 600m sounds muffeld and thin
Preferred the MA's for the first song, but didn't like either for the second. We own a pair of the Bronze 100's, and there are some songs that just don't quite sound right, but others sound amazing.
I too own bronze 100. The orchestra music with high pitch string sound (violins) is not its strength IMHO.
@Jeremy Belzunces how about the rock music?
@@angelochung9803 how about the rock music?
600m by far go get em
Bronze 100 💪
I find them both irritating to listen to. No need to shout to impress, where I find the Klipsch much more worse being bright and in your face. I get the picture trying to imitate some sort of 'live performance', but projecting raw sound at your eyeballs is, imo, always a lesser idea.
Anyway, thank you again E Project for this shootout 💪
600M all day long.
Both Rocks!! For their price are excellent!! Klipsh on the fast part of song #2 excells!!! Dynamics are great as well and it doesnt seem to harden the sound …..but that V shape…..anyway for audiophiles might not be the right one…..MA is very detailed clean with better mids (klipsh dont have any)…..bands and singers are in-front of you close and center…….with klipsh music is coming from behind the system…..but its more punchy
You should try pairing both with Rotel and Nad……..Cambridge cax81 would be interesting match also!
First song - Monitor Audio win. More wide and natural sound stage. Klipsch is too narrow and straightforward.
Second song - Klipsch win. Cons became pros. Straight and intense sound. Very good kick. However, Monitor Audio is too wide and scattered, unorganized.
So, pick of taste then.
Пожалуй самое точное описание звука MA.... слишком широк и разбросан. 👍🏻💥 вроде-как отлично, но что-то не то....🤷🏿♀️
The MA, just my opinion, is more geared toward HT use... The Klipsch, well, it's Klipsch.
HT?
@@kost_bakalow Home Theatre.
Both are similar tastes with treble boost, but RP600M is way harsher. There is also a higher-mid dip with RP600M. Bronze 100 is significantly better and more balanced with smoother frequency response.
Both bright sounding.Klipsch is less bright.Not for me both......
Bronze 100 much more accurate
Do you have a favorite stand out speaker out of all the ones you have tested?
thanks, there are so many speakers I like.... IMO, KEF's are wonderful with Yamaha amp
@@eprojectEllie And with Denon AVR-S970H or similar?
I never really know how these sound battles show anything, surly the recording and playback systems degrade and alter the sound far too much, they sound completely different through my different headphones. (I don't mean to hate on the creator too much they've obviously put in a lot of effort, but I mean the "sound offs" as a general).
I wanna get hold of the klipsch for an audition as they do look pretty cool, would possibly use them for a gaming setup, they are maybe a little expensive in the UK (around 3x the bronze), I got my Monitor audio Gold 100's for the same retail price of the klipsch so would like to compare them.
Many would describe the MA as a warmer sounding speaker. Maybe slightly sweeter. To me it sounds like a curtain is hanging in front of it. Detail and accuracy are muddied up. Klipsch a 1000 times better!!
Klipsch! 100%
The Bronze is an upgrade to the 600M for those who wants to take a step nearer towards hi fidelity while still requiring a bright sound. I would personally steer clear of both as I cant stand anything boosted. Not even for movies. Neutrality and balance are king.
Which speakers do you consider to be balanced and neutral?
@@saandroosgobi9402 Wharfedale Diamond 12.2, Polk Reserve R200
Polkr200 is ok and the wharfdales are boring. The most neutral speakers are Revels which I own but Neutral is boring.
@@oldassgamer9138 The statement that neutral is boring shows you know nothing.
@@AbsoluteFidelity bet I know more than you …
600m💪
Great comparison. Like your channel. Not exactly the best musical themes in my opinion...maybe Blackberry Smoke / Old Shoes , Allan Taylor / Color to the moon. Would be more suitable THANK YOU!!! We are waiting for new videos. Health and good luck!!!
Klipsch !
🤔🎧🎶🎶🎶🎶MAB 100✌🏻👍👍👍👍👍👍✌🏻✌🏻🇵🇱
The song remember me, is by which artist ?
Marloe
Monitor Audio Bronze 100 by far...
0:34 author's name?
First song Monitor Audio.
Second song Klipsch.
to me, klipsch won
The Bronze is much more realistic, detailed, balanced, and natural sounding, compared to the sucked out midrange and shrill treble of the Klipsch. Klipsch speakers like this are made for newbies who don't know true good sound, and are impressed by pumped up bass and treble, like a V curve on an equalizer. It calls attention to itself in the showroom on a quick audition, but at home it will become tiring very quickly. And, it sounds like you still aren't matching the levels. The Klipsch has higher sensitivity, and so will be louder with the same amp settings, so it will sound better to most listeners just because it's louder
BINGO, you hit the nail. I'm on this for a a few decades, and have the exact same feeling about it.
Not all Klipsh's sound/measure the same. Ive never owned any but to say they are only for newbies is ignorant, it's subjective.
Aparentemente los MA se defienden bastante bien en los rangos altos, pero he notado que muchos bafles de reconocidas marcas tienden a pormenorizar los sonidos de frecuencia alta y centrarse en los medios y/o graves (obviamente en la medida de sus posibilidades), lo que para mí suele ser un error ya que le quita sutileza al sonido, y lo aleja de la realidad. De todos modos los Klipsch no logran acoplar correctamente medios y graves.. bueno eso noto yo.
Saludos!!!
To me ma sounded a lot worse to be honest less alive
Saying Klipsch RP-600M is a bad speaker because of your short-sighted explanation is typically for newbies who don't know how to use them correctly.
Everyone please list your listening gear.
AKG K550 Reference Headphones, I just bought 2 pairs of the MA Bronze 100's for £259 a pair UK, will be using as Surround and rear Surround, with my Denon X6700H, powered by an Emotive BasX A4 amp. The saving over the price of the Klipsch (£600+) pays for the Emotiva.
There are practically endless factors that would make these speakers sound totally different in your home. It's nearly impossible to know what they would sound like in your home.
the list is too long to list. but thank you for trying.
Klipsh menos palco e mais justa, porém mais definida, MA maior palco e mais solta, porém menos definida...!
Bronze!
MA bronze for me.
Monitor Audio sounds better then Klipsh. This Klipsh is dissapointment.
definitely the Bronze.. dimensions better
The speakers don't move! This is a dummy test!
Klipsh better!
Klipsch better
Bronze!!!
First song Bonze, secundaria song Klipsch. Is no perfect speaker.
But there is perfect English. That was not it.
600Ms trounce the Bronze 100s...
Bronze ....win😅😅
Klipsch has a better sound, the monitors lack a lot in the mids.
totally agreed. and Klipsch has more bass although MA has bigger woofer.