The German MKS-180 is perhaps the most impressive overall. Special mention to the C-Sword though for the sexiest looks and intriguing tech. By the way, the French are now giving English names to their ships? Sacrebleu, what has the world come to? ;)
That Type 55 is NO JOKE. It's advanced weapons systems, stealth, and capable radars make it a very formidable foe. Especially when Zumwalt is non-performing as of right now.
Once the US gets the railguns or some other high-tech weaponry on the three Zumwalts, those things are going to be deadly. The Arleigh-Burke flight 3A is another thing to look at
Did anyone spot the mistake ar 5:45, when he said that the type 55 carries 84 vertical launch cells aft, but the caption said 48? (48 was the correct quantity)
@@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 One small Dutch sub sank a US carrier, a cruiser, two destroyers and 3 frigates in one training mission (JTFEX / TMDI99). I'm sure the flying dutchie could deal with a random destroyer.
@@janvanvroonhoven3278 dude, that sub was swedish and was able to do what it did because it was old. Anyway the flying dutchman isn't actually dutch, davy Jones was scottish
i don't know much about the design, but i can say that is not getting built. CMN isn't in a good financial state at all, and nobody ordrered a C SWORD 90 since 2014. I have doubts, maybe an african country bought some for anti piracy purposes, but i can't find any trace of it on the internet. CMN is eating dust right now, and i'm pretty sure the C sword 90 doesn't belong on the list with the others, while it does look cool.
French Corvette sounds very marketable to many other nations which maybe its real purpose not too expensive while promising to do much in compact size Operation
Just to clear this up for anyone wondering, the naval speeds, operational ranges, and even armaments are usually classified information. The numbers and details civilians receive are the previewed and accepted numbers that those countries' governments are willing to share with the public. Meaning with the Chinese and Russian ships, they are likely to have much faster and wider range of operations than publicly available information would say.
Sweden is a dark horse ..They have some very nice stealth ships in the pipe line and their sub managed to " sink " a US Aircraft carrier in a naval exercise it was so quiet
Personally I think the idea of modularity is greatly underestimated. The ability to have a ship which could swap out a damaged module for a working one and be operational again immediately is immense.
Yep, i second that thought. The idea that you can fit that thing with different mission modules,store the ones you not currently need and upgrade them with the newest tech, makes them the most versatile, cost efficient and in the long run, the ones that can be upgraded with the lowest cost to current standards.
The German is extremely underpowered... 0vls !? Check out the South Korean Sejong the great class. It's roughly the same price at 900M and it's a proper multirole platform.
@@jbmpr If memory serves me right, the Korean ship is a missile destroyer. That's not exactly multirole. The MKS is a replacement for the Brandenburg class, it's main function is ASW. And it does have an MK41 VLS that quad packs 64 ESSM. I believe, the Sejong fits twice that number of some US made interceptors.
@@jbmpr There is a dilemma today in every military forces: multirole x specialization. Its almost like JoKenPo hand game. I am trying to be easy to understand. Therefore the issue is not the money but the philosophy of each Military Forces.
"Imagine an 8000 ton frigate that has no anti air missiles or anti sub weaponry... " Germany: "Hold my beer. Here's our Baden-Wuerttemberg class frigate.... "
They have smaller speed boats that can go 45 mph and fire missiles and heavy machine gun fire. These smaller speed boats are armored and one could take out dozens of speed boats. The larger ships also are able to fire massive amounts of heavy gun fire. So it is highly doubtful that a 100 enemy small boats would ever get within range to even fire one missile.
@@effexon Submarines are by far the most deadly instrument of war in existence with the possible exception of stealth bombers. To counter this threat, carrier groups are escorted by submarines. The destroyers in the escorts also are very good and destroying enemy submarines. The sensors and various radars that carrier groups use detect threats several hundred miles away. It is very difficult for an enemy to get close enough to attack an aircraft carrier. The greatest threat are new, ultra long range missiles that are said to have a range of over 800 miles. However, these missiles are at best in development and have not been used successfully in battle. It takes multiple coordinated guidance systems to guide a missile accurately that far away.
So many errors in the commentary, that this has lost all credibility. Shows the NZ flag as the Australian flag. Mistakes 48 as 84, cannot correctly identify helicopters, etc, etc, etc.
AS FAR AS HELICOPTER IS CONCERNED, I ASSUME U ARE AUSTRALIAN AND THE HELICOPTER HE SHOWED WHILE TALKING ABOUT UR COUNTRY IS A MERLIN WHICH IS A BRITISH HELICOPTER. WHICH IS NOT THE ONE YOUR COUNTRY WILL USE, UR COUNTRY WILL USE THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER. BUT GIVEN THAT IT IS A BRITISH PROGRAMME HE SHOWED THE MERLIN MAY BE TO STRESS THAT BOTH COUNTRIES DESIGN HANGAR WILL CARRY A DIFFERENT HELICOPTER.
nowadays you don't need speed, we have missiles for that, unless the ship is build for carrier escort. In the old days, you need speed, so you could catch up with you'r enemy and get your guns in range
@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Actually no. No line of Battle Battleships of WW1 could exceed 26 kts. A few mid/late war 1 Battle crusiers could near enough but not dreadnought/Battleships.
One of the clips you showed when discussing the Australian frigate, you depicted an Australian flag. Trouble is, it wasn't the Australian flag...it was the New Zealand one!!!
Too bad there were so many gross mistakes in this video: to include showing the Merlin helo instead of the Sikorsky MH-60R that the RAN uses or the flag of New Zealand for that of Australia. Also showing ships no longer in service such as retired USN battleships, Iroquois destroyers of the RCN (soon to be phased out completely) to name a few.
What about the Kirov heavy class battle cruiser? There's only 1 in service but 2 more are being modernize for deployment by 2025-2030. NATO did say these ship can project more firepower than the Iowa or any battleship. I think it deserves a spotlight on this list
Old.... if you notice, he say they are talking about the newest ships, that are on the drawing bord.... on side note, a single submarine like for example, the Norwegian Ula class, can easily take out Kirov.... but then Ula class was build for that, to make havoc in a fleet. Kirov's only advantage is it's size... so it can carry many weapons, it is a mobile fortress build to protect home waters with the ability to launch many missiles in a short period of time.... that size is also it biggest weakens.... The reason Kirov class and the other Russian cruisers was build big, was due to Russian (Soviet) missiles during cold war wasn't as good as western missile that could be compact. so to compensate for that, Soviet Navy build ships like the Kirov that could carry enough missiles to overrun a defense system and at least a few of those missile would get trough... But then US-Navy developed Aegis combat system with the SPY-1 radar, that have the capability to detect and track multiple targets (in the hundreds+++), and suddenly Kirov advantage was gone. There is a reason Royal Norwegian Navy use an light version of SPY-1 radar on the frigate's.... for that reason, when you have a small frigate that can detect all your 100+ missile and can engage them all within 10 seconds + - ..... suddenly a big ship like Kirov is ...pointless, and the same frigate can deploy advance stealth anti ship missile in form of NSM/JSM.... and at there are no Navy that have defense against it. When size kills you! There is a reason Russia si building only corvettes and frigates now. And are planing a future Cruiser/destroyer to replace there aging cruiser and destroyers and one day Kirov class!
That german one looked so nice, I'm just so sad that there's so much focus on milatary and we disregard so much the devolopment of tech to aid mankind as a whole....
SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 I’m a fan of naval vessels civilian and military lots of navies used metric for armaments and vessels dimensions. Only the US navy used the imperial measurement sir. Get your facts right.
Type 45: 4.5inch mk8 USS Arleigh burke: 5inch Mark45 Hms vanguard: BL 15 inch gun KMS Bismark:15in SK C/34 USS zumwalt: 6inch advanced gun system Kms Scharnhorst: 11inch sk c/34 These are the official names for the weapons, notice how they're all in imperial?
That’s why the American Navy is retiring all those new 6 year old warships, fitted with gasoline turbines and diesel generators. They have shown to host a laundry list of maintenance issues along with issues with the propulsion system
Can't say wich one of them is better. Every ship has it's own capabilititys and it's own purpose in order to fit with any country needs. Other countries need small vessels, fast and flexible while others need large ships in order to carry warheads.
please indicate metric units. I doubt the British navy or the French navy create their ships in feet and pounds. Nowadays it makes more sense to use metrics internationally. Your videos are not only seen in Texas...
When built, we will see if type 26 is a good ship. Until now is only a screen animation. Type 45 were the "best destroyers in the world" until they went to warn waters and its engines failed. Now, we know the type 45 cannot combat using full electrical power. So, we will see.
I worked on Type 26 and trust me, its heading the same way as QE and T45. I served on 2 T45s as well so I know first hand what the quality of those things is. Without the MFR, they would be worthless. Badly built in my opinion. The RNOPVs that I also worked on were beyond anything I had seen before. Falling to bits out of build and dangerous to operate. Very poor shipbuilding standards.
@@JP-xn7si nope, its not because if a missile gets shot down, you just launch another but if a plane gets shot down, you've just lost a pilot and $200million and then have to go thru the process of readying and launching another
This Yatch comes with aerial Combat, Anti Submarine warefare, Modular Payloads, Sleek looks and can Hold Refrigerated Beers and Kitchen as Per international Standards. *Bruce Wayne* : Dose it come in Black? *UAE* : is there a Gold coated module? *Indian* : Whats the Mileage per liter? *China* : We can make it for 90% Lesser price !
If these are the deadliest ships, how many kills do they have? And at what cost were their victories, that is, how many times were they crippled and how many lives were lost?
@@philippesoares1745 Thanks for the info. One example is the carrier Charles DeGualle; awarded the U.S. Navy Meritorious Unit Award for the ISIS campaign.
1 Billion Dollar a piece... Imagine what you could do with "just" the money needed to buy these ships, I'm not even talking about equipping, maintenance etc... Why does all these weapon systems always seem to cost more and more money. And don't tell me now that a Bismarck today would cost at least 3 Billion....
All of those ships have its own advantage and disadvantages unless they come into combat that the only way you could know which is the better battles ship
Is it me or rattling non stop a bunch of technical weapon numbers and names that tells the genera laymen nothing is boring. That and the clickbate with the French fregate on the thumbnail is a cheap trick.
1:12 this guy actually put a glock sound effect over a cannon xD
The .50 cal sound for ak630 and the 76.2mm Auto canon is worse to me
Nah, that sounded like a sig to me.
😂 So misleading.
Shows a newzealand flag while talking about Australia 🤦♂️
the flag was not NZ, we only have 4 stars
@@zeromii3234 im Australian i dont need to Google it... i have one in my shed.
@@zeromii3234
Pretty sure we know what our flag looks like champ, and it doesn't have red stars on it.
I'd love to be able to buy the C Sword 90 and convert it into my own personal yacht. But I still want the guns left on it.
No way, lose those guns and put in a jacuzzi .
@@emanym is it too much to ask for both
Hey brussel639, If you get one let me know. I'll bring some beer and we will go fishing. Plus if I can shoot your guns...I'll buy you dinner. 😶🤗
It is a sexy booger.
The German MKS-180 is perhaps the most impressive overall. Special mention to the C-Sword though for the sexiest looks and intriguing tech. By the way, the French are now giving English names to their ships? Sacrebleu, what has the world come to? ;)
Well the best looking one is the French Corvette; in capability they're all similar...
That Type 55 is NO JOKE. It's advanced weapons systems, stealth, and capable radars make it a very formidable foe.
Especially when Zumwalt is non-performing as of right now.
Once the US gets the railguns or some other high-tech weaponry on the three Zumwalts, those things are going to be deadly. The Arleigh-Burke flight 3A is another thing to look at
@@aintnobodycare6193 we canceled the rail guns, too high maintenance.
@@spartangoku7610 boo
The ship in the thumbnail is the cutest thing i've ever seen
FREM is missing. A lot of images do not match the story telling.
The French vessel on the thumbnail looks absolutely stunning....
Designed to protect their fishing boats while plundering post Brexit UK waters.
My thought exactly.
@@alfredneuman6488 blame your politicians
The looks is probably the only thing that works.
@@jassimaltoki3580 They don't plunder the waters where I live
"It would be a sitting duck. . .." FIND ME A STOCK PHOTO OF A DAMNED DUCK!
Or simply a photo of the USS Cole with a giant bomb hole in its hull... what, too soon ? :-D
I saw my name on the thumbnail and had to check this video out. Glad I did, there are some really great videos here.
Anything you say, Mr. C[ur]S[e]words
Welcome to the marine nationale
Did anyone spot the mistake ar 5:45, when he said that the type 55 carries 84 vertical launch cells aft, but the caption said 48? (48 was the correct quantity)
You are truly a hero. So glad you pointed this out instead of just watching the video like everyone else, equally as stunning as brave.
Even these ships will be given a run for their money ánd lives when they'll encounter ... The Flying Dutchman!
Technically the dutchman is a frigate, so send a destroyer and its done for
@andy zhang thats a movie, the flying dutchman was a legend for hundreds of years before the movie
@@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 One small Dutch sub sank a US carrier, a cruiser, two destroyers and 3 frigates in one training mission (JTFEX / TMDI99). I'm sure the flying dutchie could deal with a random destroyer.
@andy zhang Djeee, you actually believe in fairytal...oh wait, nvm!
@@janvanvroonhoven3278 dude, that sub was swedish and was able to do what it did because it was old. Anyway the flying dutchman isn't actually dutch, davy Jones was scottish
"Hunter class will be built in Australia" - Shows New Zealand flag.....
'Yeah. I cringed too.
What is New Zealand?
sword c90 looks the most next gen design and very good all round caps for a corvette class
So true it looks the coolest and i like how it's complement is as well as such diverse capabilities but I also like the one from Germany,
i don't know much about the design, but i can say that is not getting built. CMN isn't in a good financial state at all, and nobody ordrered a C SWORD 90 since 2014. I have doubts, maybe an african country bought some for anti piracy purposes, but i can't find any trace of it on the internet. CMN is eating dust right now, and i'm pretty sure the C sword 90 doesn't belong on the list with the others, while it does look cool.
Good sense of humour with edit, "can shoot down helicopters" Marine 1, "can deal with small coastal ships", Cruise Ships
Showing Battleship when you said 21st Century Warship
Me : that's 20th Century Warship to be exact it has been built in 1943
Top marks for comparing it to the type 55 because that ship is the benchmark
I have no idea what's best. They all sound pretty dynamic in their own way in different scenarios
French Corvette sounds very marketable to many other nations which maybe its real purpose not too expensive while promising to do much in compact size Operation
It looks awesome but there are no orders for it and it is doubtfull that shipyard could built them.
It probably will stay as a mere cool render.
Just to clear this up for anyone wondering, the naval speeds, operational ranges, and even armaments are usually classified information. The numbers and details civilians receive are the previewed and accepted numbers that those countries' governments are willing to share with the public. Meaning with the Chinese and Russian ships, they are likely to have much faster and wider range of operations than publicly available information would say.
Incredible deceptive camouflage on these 'Deadly Military Ships'.
Many of them look just like old retired WWII preserved memorials and museum ships.
i'll assume you're just being sarcastic lol.
@@chriswhited Mmmm.... a little bit.
I suspect my cat could do better film editing.
@@agwhitaker then we agree.......not sure what they were thinking past just being lazy.
Good to see the Type 26 getting some respect, it is something of an underrated achievement in the UK.
Once built type 26 will be the best war vessel in the world.
For now that place is occupied by the type 055.
Hahaha, I bet Argentinians would say otherwise.
Sweden is a dark horse ..They have some very nice stealth ships in the pipe line and their sub managed to " sink " a US Aircraft carrier in a naval exercise it was so quiet
Great to see our allies developing badass ships! I’m American btw
You mean vazal states because the US has no real friends any more....
@@Triggernlfrl Yes. That, unfortunately.
Type 26 all the way, so many different variants for one Hull..
Swap and change weapon bays for so many different missions.
Yes RN...
Personally I think the idea of modularity is greatly underestimated. The ability to have a ship which could swap out a damaged module for a working one and be operational again immediately is immense.
Wait no metric? I need to know wjat the conversion for 150 sailors is in metric!!!!
multiply by 1.60934
@@andyman8630 thank you!
wait, why, what? 150 sailors is 150 sailors
150 sea men
Zumwalt class destroyers: **am I a joke to you**
Decommissioned!
Very interesting program. The whole world is watching, so it would be nice if the measurements would be done in metric (SI).
The German MKS 180 is the most impressive to me.
A gold mention to impressive design of French C Sword 90 and Swedish MCMV 80.
Yep, i second that thought. The idea that you can fit that thing with different mission modules,store the ones you not currently need and upgrade them with the newest tech, makes them the most versatile, cost efficient and in the long run, the ones that can be upgraded with the lowest cost to current standards.
The German is extremely underpowered... 0vls !? Check out the South Korean Sejong the great class. It's roughly the same price at 900M and it's a proper multirole platform.
@@jbmpr If memory serves me right, the Korean ship is a missile destroyer. That's not exactly multirole. The MKS is a replacement for the Brandenburg class, it's main function is ASW. And it does have an MK41 VLS that quad packs 64 ESSM. I believe, the Sejong fits twice that number of some US made interceptors.
@@jbmpr There is a dilemma today in every military forces: multirole x specialization.
Its almost like JoKenPo hand game.
I am trying to be easy to understand.
Therefore the issue is not the money but the philosophy of each Military Forces.
Packed with deadly armament is a necessity for every battle ship nowadays, so no one want to mess with you in high sea.
warship, battleships are a retired ship class
Battleships are unfortunately gone 😔
"Imagine an 8000 ton frigate that has no anti air missiles or anti sub weaponry... "
Germany: "Hold my beer. Here's our Baden-Wuerttemberg class frigate.... "
Wait for UK ships, the MOD's favourite phrase is "fitted for but not with"
@@tomsmith2209 i heard that the new air carriers were almost defenceless. Did they get rid of some AA defence?
6:35 "and, if needed, to evacuate German citizens..." - shows picture of Munich...
A 100 fast and tiny patrol boats can attack with missiles while avoiding the immense defenses of a modern aircraft carrier.
They have smaller speed boats that can go 45 mph and fire missiles and heavy machine gun fire. These smaller speed boats are armored and one could take out dozens of speed boats. The larger ships also are able to fire massive amounts of heavy gun fire.
So it is highly doubtful that a 100 enemy small boats would ever get within range to even fire one missile.
@@flfl3969 howabout submarines? are they still a thing or are those systems too powerful detecting and destroying subs in modern battlefield?
@@effexon Submarines are by far the most deadly instrument of war in existence with the possible exception of stealth bombers. To counter this threat, carrier groups are escorted by submarines. The destroyers in the escorts also are very good and destroying enemy submarines.
The sensors and various radars that carrier groups use detect threats several hundred miles away. It is very difficult for an enemy to get close enough to attack an aircraft carrier. The greatest threat are new, ultra long range missiles that are said to have a range of over 800 miles. However, these missiles are at best in development and have not been used successfully in battle. It takes multiple coordinated guidance systems to guide a missile accurately that far away.
Les navires français c'est les meilleurs 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵 vive la France
Translation: French ships are the best, long live France
@@pxilant5031 American ships are the best best. But we're always ready to help out France! 🇺🇲🇫🇷
Wow I hate patriotic people stop being proud of something you never helped in creating my god
@@pxilant5031 Maybe you just have nothing to be proud of. What's this about not helping to create America? I'm an American. Nobody else does the job.
The sea sword 90 corvette would be perfect for a small coastal country like Portugal. 👍
Sim!
"at Osborn naval shipyard": shows picture of NZ flag
4:33 Arma 3 with mods sequence xD
The Germany design is a great contender
compact in size but dangerous, nice👍👍
Ah... You've got a New Zealand flag with red stars, as the Aussie flag?
Are you guys not the same.
@@Beniamin6665 Ha, ha.
You have the best videos
Sending a warship to help in a disaster makes no sense, it would be better to send disaster protection rather than a warship.
It sends the warship because of the resources and personel it carries
There is so much wrong with this video I had to make sure it wasn't produced by the Verge.
the ship "Poor Richard" # 6 suffered a fire for five days in San Diego Harbour. It is done and will never sail again, entire crew has been reassigned.
So many errors in the commentary, that this has lost all credibility. Shows the NZ flag as the Australian flag. Mistakes 48 as 84, cannot correctly identify helicopters, etc, etc, etc.
OH SHUT UP ARMCHAIR ADMIRAL. WHAT DO U KNOW THAT WE DON'T?
AS FAR AS HELICOPTER IS CONCERNED, I ASSUME U ARE AUSTRALIAN AND THE HELICOPTER HE SHOWED WHILE TALKING ABOUT UR COUNTRY IS A MERLIN WHICH IS A BRITISH HELICOPTER. WHICH IS NOT THE ONE YOUR COUNTRY WILL USE, UR COUNTRY WILL USE THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER. BUT GIVEN THAT IT IS A BRITISH PROGRAMME HE SHOWED THE MERLIN MAY BE TO STRESS THAT BOTH COUNTRIES DESIGN HANGAR WILL CARRY A DIFFERENT HELICOPTER.
(slow clap) Feel better now? Where would we be without your expertise?
Also showed a drawing of Russia's Poseidon autonomous nuclear torpedo and labelled it as a "Anti submarine rocket"
No American aircraft carriers? That's just objectively wrong. There's not even a Zumwalt!
At least show the correct stuff in the videos while talking about it.
There are so many mistakes here :P
“Anti aircraft” *shows images of WWII Japanese aircraft being downed*
I like it when our allies arm up. Good job UK, Aus and Canada.
I think both are great! And what’s more great is the fact that both nations are allies!
🇫🇷🌎😎🌐🌍😊
Vive Le France.
Newest Ship and Deadly.
Arround the World. 🇫🇷🌎😎
26 knots, that's a bit on the slow side, isn't it?
Just a bit... There were 1st world war battleships that could outrun that
@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Dreadnought could've
nowadays you don't need speed, we have missiles for that, unless the ship is build for carrier escort.
In the old days, you need speed, so you could catch up with you'r enemy and get your guns in range
@@davidandmartinealbon3155 Actually no. No line of Battle Battleships of WW1 could exceed 26 kts. A few mid/late war 1 Battle crusiers could near enough but not dreadnought/Battleships.
@@caseylimbert266 Dreadnought had a maximum speed of 21 knots
I’m having a strange feeling like I’ve watched a commercial film...🧐as I want to buy some
One of the clips you showed when discussing the Australian frigate, you depicted an Australian flag. Trouble is, it wasn't the Australian flag...it was the New Zealand one!!!
I sure hope these defense contractors have developed a reliable method to defend against torpedoes!
All those Military Ships are good for bullying only , ICBM is a game changer .
These are fascinating, but also worrying.
The Sea Sword is a bautiful ship. They all look great, though.
The German and French ships look unreaaaal
Too bad there were so many gross mistakes in this video: to include showing the Merlin helo instead of the Sikorsky MH-60R that the RAN uses or the flag of New Zealand for that of Australia. Also showing ships no longer in service such as retired USN battleships, Iroquois destroyers of the RCN (soon to be phased out completely) to name a few.
yes too many basic errors get it right and do your research
What about the Kirov heavy class battle cruiser? There's only 1 in service but 2 more are being modernize for deployment by 2025-2030. NATO did say these ship can project more firepower than the Iowa or any battleship. I think it deserves a spotlight on this list
Old.... if you notice, he say they are talking about the newest ships, that are on the drawing bord....
on side note, a single submarine like for example, the Norwegian Ula class, can easily take out Kirov.... but then Ula class was build for that, to make havoc in a fleet. Kirov's only advantage is it's size... so it can carry many weapons, it is a mobile fortress build to protect home waters with the ability to launch many missiles in a short period of time.... that size is also it biggest weakens....
The reason Kirov class and the other Russian cruisers was build big, was due to Russian (Soviet) missiles during cold war wasn't as good as western missile that could be compact. so to compensate for that, Soviet Navy build ships like the Kirov that could carry enough missiles to overrun a defense system and at least a few of those missile would get trough... But then US-Navy developed Aegis combat system with the SPY-1 radar, that have the capability to detect and track multiple targets (in the hundreds+++), and suddenly Kirov advantage was gone.
There is a reason Royal Norwegian Navy use an light version of SPY-1 radar on the frigate's.... for that reason, when you have a small frigate that can detect all your 100+ missile and can engage them all within 10 seconds + - ..... suddenly a big ship like Kirov is ...pointless, and the same frigate can deploy advance stealth anti ship missile in form of NSM/JSM.... and at there are no Navy that have defense against it.
When size kills you! There is a reason Russia si building only corvettes and frigates now. And are planing a future Cruiser/destroyer to replace there aging cruiser and destroyers and one day Kirov class!
That german one looked so nice, I'm just so sad that there's so much focus on milatary and we disregard so much the devolopment of tech to aid mankind as a whole....
Since the dawn of time mankind has been making technological advances through military development
Far more is spent on tech to aid mankind as a whole.
excellent narration
That where the French taxes went lol
no we can have the best social protection system in the world a good standard of living and be able to have the 6th army in the world 😉😉
at 10.22 loved watching the F 334 NRP Dom Francisco de Almeida firing its guns...a Dutch Karel Doorman-class frigate that Portugal bought...
None of these ships are truly deadly at all. None of them have killed anything to date
Could you use metric as well please. Thanks. Great video by the way.
In navys they tend to use imperial more often than metric
SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 Not in the rest of world navies where they have been using metric since the 20th century.
@@grnm2719 well, in terms of weapon diameter atleast
SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 I’m a fan of naval vessels civilian and military lots of navies used metric for armaments and vessels dimensions. Only the US navy used the imperial measurement sir. Get your facts right.
Type 45: 4.5inch mk8
USS Arleigh burke: 5inch Mark45
Hms vanguard: BL 15 inch gun
KMS Bismark:15in SK C/34
USS zumwalt: 6inch advanced gun system
Kms Scharnhorst: 11inch sk c/34
These are the official names for the weapons, notice how they're all in imperial?
1 billion each? Guess it's a good time to be a landlocked country
That’s why the American Navy is retiring all those new 6 year old warships, fitted with gasoline turbines and diesel generators. They have shown to host a laundry list of maintenance issues along with issues with the propulsion system
Interesting that they didn't include the United States' DDG 1000 series, or even a DDG Type IIA.
Because the DDG 1000 program has been cancelled
I liked the look of that Saab its cool that they still make stuff I wish they made care still GM ruined that 4 everyone 😤
Saab is very much hated in NS they screwed alot of ppls lives when they closed shop and left so I guess ppl should hate GM here too ... Go FORD LOL
Saab still has a role in military development they just quit making cars it was a piss hole
Not the same company.... They split somewhere in the 90s.....
Exactly
Our Swedish army and general is awesome!
During the Falkland war USA did not provide Air support for the RAF,but nedded help in IRAQ.AFghanistan &LIBia,we need to think far ahead
Can't say wich one of them is better. Every ship has it's own capabilititys and it's own purpose in order to fit with any country needs. Other countries need small vessels, fast and flexible while others need large ships in order to carry warheads.
The Indians also have a good destroyer with Brahmos cruise missiles and Barak 8 SAM system 🚀
please indicate metric units. I doubt the British navy or the French navy create their ships in feet and pounds.
Nowadays it makes more sense to use metrics internationally. Your videos are not only seen in Texas...
When built, we will see if type 26 is a good ship. Until now is only a screen animation.
Type 45 were the "best destroyers in the world" until they went to warn waters and its engines failed. Now, we know the type 45 cannot combat using full electrical power.
So, we will see.
I worked on Type 26 and trust me, its heading the same way as QE and T45. I served on 2 T45s as well so I know first hand what the quality of those things is. Without the MFR, they would be worthless. Badly built in my opinion. The RNOPVs that I also worked on were beyond anything I had seen before. Falling to bits out of build and dangerous to operate. Very poor shipbuilding standards.
Type 45 had shake down issues but all fixed
Nice got to subscribe 💪
I think your numbers are a bit out ..... the cost of the Type 26 / Hunter Class frigates is between 5-7 $billion each. NOT $1billion.
The MKS-180 has had a whole raft of problems.
They arent launched yet. The ship class you are talking about is the f125
You know that when talking about Karakurt you showed the dimensions and speed on Buyan, right? :)
C sword 90 looks awesome😍😍😍
Great animation
Someone should tell the Germans the mission module's we're tried with the American LCS. Doesn't work too well.
David teer The thing is with the yanks there is always plenty more.
It's a weird inclusion anyway. It's specifically designed for asymmetric warfare. Not a strong ship at all... and I say this as a German.
love it talking about ship being made in Australia only to be showing the New Zealand flag
Most deadly ships in the world and not a single aircraft carrier, right
Because its the aircraft and pilots that do the damage not the ship its self
@@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 Aircraft are the weapons of a carrier.
That's like saying it's the missiles doing the damage not the actual ship
@@JP-xn7si nope, its not because if a missile gets shot down, you just launch another but if a plane gets shot down, you've just lost a pilot and $200million and then have to go thru the process of readying and launching another
This Yatch comes with aerial Combat, Anti Submarine warefare, Modular Payloads, Sleek looks and can Hold Refrigerated Beers and Kitchen as Per international Standards.
*Bruce Wayne* : Dose it come in Black?
*UAE* : is there a Gold coated module?
*Indian* : Whats the Mileage per liter?
*China* : We can make it for 90% Lesser price !
The Type-55 looks an awful lot like a Visby class corvette....
If these are the deadliest ships, how many kills do they have? And at what cost were their victories, that is, how many times were they crippled and how many lives were lost?
Huh. Bunch of coastguard vessels talking about DEADLY.
Too many mixed incorrect pictures. For example, a French ship with U.S. service (medals) insignia.
In fact some french ships received some US medals a few years ago.... Can't remenber wich one tho...
@@philippesoares1745
Thanks for the info. One example is the carrier Charles DeGualle; awarded the U.S. Navy Meritorious Unit Award for the ISIS campaign.
5:47 did he say 84? As it shows 48 or am I missing something here? Just confused to what the actual numbers are for the aft tubes. Awsome vid btw!
He accidentally said 84, but the ship only has 48 aft tubes. More in the front than in the back,
@Glenn Bolger No time for retakes, let alone reloads - 48
1 Billion Dollar a piece... Imagine what you could do with "just" the money needed to buy these ships, I'm not even talking about equipping, maintenance etc... Why does all these weapon systems always seem to cost more and more money. And don't tell me now that a Bismarck today would cost at least 3 Billion....
Nothing a DF41 can't solve, or... a dozen
That russian cannon on their ship sounded tough. What about an American ship in this video or did I miss something.
I was thinking the same thing, where are the American War ships?!
really throwing shade to the zumwalt huh
well... as a German I was baffled to see one of our ships on this list. I mean, we our navy is (mostly) satisfied with ships able to move😂
Well you guys lack quantity but not quality.
0:14 "most deadliest"
All of those ships have its own advantage and disadvantages unless they come into combat that the only way you could know which is the better battles ship
Is it me or rattling non stop a bunch of technical weapon numbers and names that tells the genera laymen nothing is boring. That and the clickbate with the French fregate on the thumbnail is a cheap trick.
U missed the Indian Vishakapatnam class destroyer