Evolution of French Infantry During World War 1 I THE GREAT WAR Special
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
- The French soldier in 1914 was already very different from the one in 1918 if you looked at his uniform or equipment. Also the combat tactics evolved considerably in four years of war. The Battle of Verdun, the Nivelle Offensive or the Battle of La Malmaison were important steps during that evolution in which the Poilu became a modern French soldier.
» HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR CHANNEL?
You can support us by sharing our videos with your friends and spreading the word about our work.You can also support us financially on Patreon: / thegreatwar
You can also buy our merchandise in our online shop: shop.spreadshir...
Patreon is a platform for creators like us, that enables us to get monthly financial support from the community in exchange for cool perks.
» WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WORLD WAR I AND WHERE ELSE CAN I FIND YOU?
We’re offering background knowledge, news, a glimpse behind the scenes and much more on:
reddit: bit.ly/TheGreat...
Facebook: bit.ly/WW1FB
Twitter: bit.ly/WW1Series
Instagram: bit.ly/ZpMYPL
» CAN I EMBED YOUR VIDEOS ON MY WEBSITE?
Of course, you can embed our videos on your website. We are happy if you show our channel to your friends, fellow students, classmates, professors, teachers or neighbours. Or just share our videos on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc.
We are also happy to get your feedback, criticism or ideas in the comments. If you have interesting historical questions, just post them and we will answer in our OUT OF THE TRENCHES videos. You can find a selection of answers to the most frequently asked questions here: bit.ly/OOtrenches
» CAN I SHOW YOUR VIDEOS IN CLASS?
Of course! Tell your teachers or professors about our channel and our videos. We’re happy if we can contribute with our videos. If you are a teacher and have questions about our show, you can get in contact with us on one of our social media presences.
» WHAT ARE YOUR SOURCES?
Videos: British Pathé
Pictures: Mostly Picture Alliance
Background Map: d-maps.com/cart...
Literature (excerpt):
Gilbert, Martin. The First World War. A Complete History, Holt Paperbacks, 2004.
Hart, Peter. The Great War. A Combat History of the First World War, Oxford University Press, 2013.
Hart, Peter. The Great War. 1914-1918, Profile Books, 2013.
Stone, Norman. World War One. A Short History, Penguin, 2008.
Keegan, John. The First World War, Vintage, 2000.
Hastings, Max. Catastrophe 1914. Europe Goes To War, Knopf, 2013.
Hirschfeld, Gerhard. Enzyklopädie Erster Weltkrieg, Schöningh Paderborn, 2004
Michalka, Wolfgang. Der Erste Weltkrieg. Wirkung, Wahrnehmung, Analyse, Seehamer Verlag GmbH, 2000
Leonhard, Jörn. Die Büchse der Pandora: Geschichte des Ersten Weltkrieges, C.H. Beck, 2014
If you want to buy some of the books we use or recommend during our show, check out our Amazon Store: bit.ly/AmazonTGW
NOTE: This store uses affiliate links which grant us a commission if you buy a product there.
» WHAT IS “THE GREAT WAR” PROJECT?
THE GREAT WAR covers the events exactly 100 years ago: The story of World War I in realtime. Featuring: The unique archive material of British Pathé. Indy Neidell takes you on a journey into the past to show you what really happened and how it all could spiral into more than four years of dire war. Subscribe to our channel and don’t miss our new episodes every Thursday.
» WHO IS REPLYING TO MY COMMENTS? AND WHO IS BEHIND THIS PROJECT?
Most of the comments are written by our social media manager Florian. He is posting links, facts and backstage material on our social media channels. But from time to time, Indy reads and answers comments with his personal account, too.
The Team responsible for THE GREAT WAR is even bigger:
CREDITS -
Presented by : Indiana Neidell
Written by: Indiana Neidell
Director: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
Director of Photography: Toni Steller
Sound: Toni Steller
Mixing, Mastering & Sound Design: www.above-zero.com
Editing: Toni Steller
Motion Design: Philipp Appelt
Research by: Indiana Neidell
Fact checking: Markus Linke
The Great War Theme composed by Karim Theilgaard: bit.ly/karimyt
A Mediakraft Networks Original Channel
Based on a concept by Spartacus Olsson
Author: Indiana Neidell
Visual Concept: David van Stephold
Producer: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
Social Media Manager: Florian Wittig
Contains licenced Material by British Pathé
All rights reserved - © Mediakraft Networks GmbH, 2018
6:33 a wheeled field kitchen is probably the most french thing of the war
Steve Kaczynski
...who borrowed the idea from the russians
Fredder 1132 What of an ignorant and stupid person you are . Get educated .
Really hard to tell someone to "Get educated" when you say "What of an ignorant"
vincent Lefebvre take a joke
vincent Lefebvre Dude.... humor
4 years and I still click on your videos the second I see them :D
ditto
US Army veteran and the son of a French Army veteran and I appreciate the sincerity of this video. France entered the war very unprepared and saddled with the wrong doctrine but everyone learned. By 1918, the pre-war French Army was gone. Shout out to France- Even in 1940, the French Army proved that it could hold it's own and even win( if given the chance
France: great soldiers, terrible politicians...
Your dad was french or from the Foreign Legion?
Bolchevik duck French Foreign Legion
In which paralel universe did France have actually chance to win in 1940?
And after ww1 they kinda let go of themselves
"even though the french leadership had realised that firepower kills"
Still much much better than Conrad
Duke of Lorraine can't argue with that, though, you forgot Cadorna.
Duke of Lorraine hows your crusade😅
ivan valenzuela Jerusalem has been taken at the end of last year so I'd say quite well.
Cadorna believed in firepower... the firepower of firing squads. Shoot enough soldiers and they'll be more afraid of you than the enemy!
Maréchal Joffre thought planes and tanks were just "nice toys for ingeneers", and the russian imperial army refused to use armored cars because "horses were afraid of it". No one was prepared, everyone f*cked up during this conflict ! ;)
The French seldom get the credit they deserve for learning from the mistakes of 1914-15. While the German Stosstruppen are well known, the French also developed "fire and maneuver" tactics using small assault units based around Chauchat light machineguns and grenadiers. To some extent these units were also equipped with the RSC Model 1917 semi-automatic rifle.
Unfortunately a recurring issue in most narratives (and not just in relation to the French army - the Austrians, Italians and the like are also woefully under analysed in English). The flashy German tactics and language issues etc play a part.
Michéal Ó hAodha True. People like to gloss over german stormtroopers but forget about French innovations that were much more important: rotary turrets on tanks, assault unit tactics...
To be fair, they also gloss over the fact that the British were also making innovatiuons along the same or similar lines. The modern Mortar for example was a British invention, and is, in essence basically the same as when it was introduced as the Stokes Mortar in 1916. All the nations learned Assault Unit tactics, infiltration by the leading waves, mop up by the followup troops, combined arms, infantry/artillery coordination, the list goes on.
I think why people are so fascinated by the Storm Troopers is because they were formed into their own specialised units, in essence they were treated as Elites. To form these elites the Germans took all their best men and officers from the Line Infantry, seriously degrading the performance of the latter because they just lost their best men, NCO's and company level officers... In contrast the British and French decided to train ALL their infantry in the new tactics, while you could definately argue that the Storm Troopers were better trained in the role, they also suffered disproportionately high casualties during an assault, and these were troops Germany simply could not replace by that period of the war.
You didn't much need to go around Chauchat machine guns. Just wait for some mud to fall on it and jammed for an hour
@@alganhar1 without the British (involvement in World War 1), the French, and the Russians would have been defeated (by Germany, and Austria-Hungary) before the end of spring, 1915!
THANKS Indy !
As a proud Frenchman who have family members that fought in WW1 (like almost all French), I thank you for breaking a myth which sadly is still going on today. France, the French soldiers, and even French officers weren't completly incompetents jerks. Joffre or Nivelle, who are even in today's France, seen as indirect mass murderers did adapt to the war (in some degree).
I have some little facts :
-1,600 artillery guns carried by motorized vehicules in the French army
-French industrial production exceeded Germany's one in 1918 (the myth of Fance as a country which relies on its allies for supplies is false)
-French Air force destroyed 637 ennemy aircrafts, and 125 balloons in 1918 alone.
That's all the facts I could get, it's not many but they are exemples of the strengh of the French army in 1918.
Finally, I would like to pay my respects to the British Army of WW1 : the British assembled a remarkably deadly force, starting from scratch in 1914. This small army became undoubtedly the 2nd most powerful army in the world, and captured in 1918 more ground and Germans than the French ! You should do a video on its evolution, Indy.
Added to the fact that the French covered 400 miles of trenches on the western front out of 480, and took the burden of the war for a long time, waiting for the British to mobilise enough men to catch up
The French lost more soldiers in ww1 than the British Empire (so canada and co comprised) and the US together
France also had more tanks than any other country in 1918, and by very far
You are acting like it's an achievement that France lost more soldiers than the other Entente nations.
Zando Zando! That's silly, he is just saying that the French had to make sacrifices no other country was willing to make, all the while bearing the brunt of the most brutal conflict at the time while most countries in the Entente took too long to participate and help them repel the Germans.
Now, now dont let your logic disrupt his prejudice :)
Djoumine: French army failed at protecting its own citizens and country. Big times.
Will you guys do a video about
planned offensives of the warring nations for 1919?
Or/and prototype of technology like weapons or vechiles that would have been used.
Has that War ever really ended? Or has the ebb and flow of history only given us brief respites from active battle?
I dont know about you, but I think we're going to keep hearing more of those, because I predict after November 11th, the carnage is going to keep raging until the only people left on the Isonzo river are Haig, Cadorna, Hotzendorf, Neville, Enver Pasha, and then the ultimate Rumble will commence!
+Colin Wolf
Marshall Haig, Lady Haig and their Turtoise "Alan"
The 97th Battle of the Isonzo will be a chutes and ladders cage match, I'm pretty sure.
Elan: 20% morale for armies.
Darling!
Ah, a man of EU4 culture!
Scipio Africanus prussia 150% discipline
Scipio Africanus actually I'd say a bit of extra morale/organisation has nothing on a lot of fire damage/hard attack
ger du Prussian ideas +100% chance to lose a World War
The French Army had the coolest uniforms (mid/late war) of WW1 in my humble opinion.
It also made them a big target to the enemy.
Their early uniforms did. I am referring to the mid/late war uniforms.
Italian uniforms, IMO. Similar in design, made of cardboard, but quite cool as well.
Among our chief weapon, Fear, Surprise, Tanks, and nice blue uniforms.
NO ONE expects the French Inquisition!!!!
"War can not be improvised."
A lesson that constantly has to be re-taught to many senior officers and political leaders. Expecting yesterdays superiority to matter next year is folly, yet we keep doing it anyway despite supposedly knowing better.
Much respect for the French Army.
naaaaah...still not really...
French armed forces are and always[*] have been magnificent.
[*]: Against third world countries and states.
They fought Germany valiantly. They sacrificed much but the brittish we're the real fighters and brittish colony troops. The French watched and used altilary well
plumbherhub not really, most of the important victories won by the allies was achieved by the French, both Marnes and Verdun, but the British were also vital, the Somme, while inconclusive, was a key drain of German resources, and the British blockade was the deciding factor.
Rostislav Svoboda Did you ever read a book ?
The strategic and Tactical analysis of this series is outstanding. Not only of great use to any History student but for anyone wishing to understand military technique and development during the 20th century. I hope this series goes on to be shown and recommended at schools and colleges. Fantastic work. Thank you Great War team.
First time I have seen this kind of detailed examination of Frances contribution to WW1. So much of the focus seems to be on Britai8and Germany. I definitely did not know about France having one of the most advanced armies by 1918. Thanks for video.
Respect to the french, even from a german. They fought like lions in ww1, to take their revange of 1871.
Respect to all nations of war. No matter the side, millions of men died to help their people.
Respect to you !
And respect for the valor and the discipline of germans, coming from a french from who his great grandfather fought in he WWI.
Don't you mean avenge?
@@HamSaladtv revenge
4:06 I love how the Frenchman on the left waves
Makes me wonder if he survived the war.
@@batozorange Even if he did survive. I doubt he came back the same man.
Vive la Poilu! Vive la France! Greetings from your friendly rivals, with emphasis on the friend, Britain
resqwec hello of the other side of the 'la manche' Friends. It's 'le' poilus 😉
Thomas Brigliadori Merci for the grammar help
@Tim Kiseljak You can say both "Le poilu" and "Les poilus" to talk about them. But yes the most of the time "les poilus" is better and more used, while "le poilu" can be used to describe them for example.
Sometimes, when i see hard bashing about my country, i feel sad for soldiers who died to defend it. Actually, it's an insult for every man in every army who fought/died in this war.
I would like to see those idiots who lough and joke in same kind of combat . They will change mind in instant.
Every time I see it, I fight it. Greetings from Poland.
Yep, the French stereotypes. "hon hon, baguette croissant oui oui I surrender!" It's bugging me out smh
The French were the Warrior Race of the Continent, and one of the best things about this series is that it tells the story of the grit and determination the French Army during the Great War
@@Nietabs The French army, statistically in the most successful mainland European army
The French are actually pretty badass.
"Their business is war, and they do their business" -Rudyard Kipling
@Сёма Маликов So they do it better
Сёма Маликов to master their craft
and they do their bussines well*
@@fynnoleianson8802 What is 3 Wars compared to 1000 years of history?
@@fynnoleianson8802 which wars? Ok for 2WW, but during 1WW we were the main army standing firm when Russia stopped to fight. England gave a big help, but has never been a continental power, and would have been absolutely unable to beat germany without French Army. Not talking about americans that came when Germany was already beaten. I am sick of ignorants that think 1WW history is the same as 2WW.
France was the decisive army of 1WW
Soviets were the decisive army of 2WW
An American historian who knows detailled topics about the French military History ? I have found gold with your channel, sir., congrats ! Thanks for your video which is very instructive, even for me as a Frenchman. I am about to watch more !
The notion that Americans believe they saved Western Europe in WWI is a European myth.
@@Garrett1240 I invite you to visit all kind of military history videos about France in TH-cam and you'll read the thousands of comments of US teens who strongly believed that "they saved our sorry arses twice". I have to engage in long disputes to explain them.
Well if ever there were a medium to represent a scholarly consensus it'd be TH-cam. American teens commenting on TH-cam videos are about as poor a population sample as you get, so pay no mind to that as it appears it has already colored your perception. American historians are firmly of the view regarding our nation's involvement in WWI as say their British contemporaries are.
@@Garrett1240 Of course. I am not talking about historians and educated people. I have nothing to teach to American historians, they know certainly even more than I do, I am not crazy.
But still I have been reading many books and watching many documentaries made by US/British TV channels or TH-cam channels and there have been, for the majority of them, downsizing the role of French military in WW1, or have been carrying on spreading stereotypes which have been shown as untrue by Historians.
A friend of mine made a documentary video, which I translated in English, to fight off these stereotypes. Enjoy:
The french fought very brave in this war... best tanks ft 17, even the americans bought our tanks, braveness along 10 month at the battle of verdun, counter attack like lions after retreating 1 month at the marne... holding 720 km / 980 of trenches in 1918...
It is true America had to buy weapons from France, as its industry was not fully developed. We had to buy tanks, those great SPAD airplanes, and of course, artillery pieces-75MM. One advantage being that we did not have to ship all of that gear across the ocean, which was infested with German U-boats.
We also got saddled with the POS Chauchats after the French army realized they were not suited for the rigors of trench warfare. But the tanks and planes and artillery were mostly excellent designs.
Ferveur Patriotique Française et Républicaine The first at time the Americans created a major army which is their army in the 19th century is practically a translation of Napoleons army doctrine into English. Even the uniforms are based off the French
You know I rarely just listen to The Great War, you chaps do such a great job of locating and editing together film and imagery from the period. However this particular special is really a masterpiece. It flows very well and really carries home the subject.
After all the reading I've done on WW1 I've never quite understood where the theory of a "weak' French army came from. All of the entente forces vastly underestimated the German strength at the beginning of the war. All entente forces had to drastically overhaul their practices to last out the war. My only theory is that it's the Americanisation of history yet again - where US forces "saved" the world of the Germans. But then as they say, history is written by the victors (I'd add "with the loudest voices"...)
Sir Monkeyboy French suffered horrendous casualties during the war . Only stupid ignorant idiots insult France . Btw France is politically the oldest nation of Europe .
Sir Monkeyboy The Sammies mostly used French equipment and French doctrine anyways.
Underestimating the strength of the enemy is much worse than being weak. Much much worse.
Vincent: Casualties happen in wars. Quelle surprise!
I would agree with the casualties, 1.3 million French dead speaks for itself.
As for France being politically the oldest country in Europe, no. England was unified under one leader before France was.
"my men are more interested in dying than working." That just feels like a very french statement 😅
All credits to the French armies of the 20th century. They were constantly dealing with a muddled mess of doctrine and logistical nightmares
On the contrary French logistics was the best on the western front, especially in 1918, Ludendorff even called the allied victory of 1918 "the victory of French trucks over German railways”
Thank you very much for this episode, it really helped me create a better understanding of the army and most importantly the allied victory in 1918
A superb, succinct, little short. The French army is so often overlooked. Thank you.
L’Armée Française was the anvil to the BEF’s hammer on which the German army was smashed.
I’m convinced that even without the BEF’s 100 Days offensive or the arrival of the Americans, France would have won in 1919. They would have swarmed the Germans with thousands of FT-Renaults tanks and armoured cars to which the Central Powers had no real answer. We would have seen a reverse Dunkirk with the mass of the German army surrounded and destroyed in Belgium.
Honestly with the Mauser 1918 anti tank rifle I wouldn't really say the central powers had no answer. But regardless even if the Germans hadn't left the Hindenburg line in 1918 to go on the offensive they probably would have collapsed into revolution by early 1919 at the latest anyway. A starving populace is the most surefire way to bring a country to it's knees
Yeah no
I don’t agree with the “French bashing”, but I don’t think that the French could have gone the distance alone. The mutiny’s of 1917 may have proved fatal if the British were not able to apply pressure and keep the Germans busy while the French sorted out their discipline issues. Furthermore; if the attrition that was absorbed over five years by their allies was concentrated on the French army only it would likely have been a spent force by 1919.
@@timebomb45
There were answers to Tanks but these early AT rifles werent it.
@@robertshiell887 If what you say is true, the British would have been overwhelmed, and would have experienced a "Dunkirk" thirty years earlier than expected, since the French hold the majority of the Western Front on land. The Mutinies did not stop the fighting for the French, it did not prevent them from maintaining their positions.
Overall, the soldiers just asked for fewer unnecessary attacks, but never sought to evade the defense of the nation.
In fact, contrary to popular belief, all nations experienced mutinies, but in France they were quickly settled, and before the end of 1917 the French were already ready for the Spring Offensive. This is where the Germans lost the initiative of the offensive, especially from the Second Battle of the Marne. After that, they were only on the defensive.
They bet everything on Artillery and shock troops, but they were never able to catch up with the mass motorization of the French army, as well as its Turn-Over system.
Of course with British support, the Germans would have been well and truly overwhelmed if the war had continued.
A magnificent recap of the french army ! Thx for that :)
This was one of the best special episodes. Thanks.
Excellent video, i really enjoyed it
The footage at 10:40 is really cool
France is really cool
PAvel Solochiny Footage combined with music made it majestic
ReAlLy CoOl.
VIVE LE FRANCE! From America! 🇺🇸 🇫🇷
Thanks Brother.
Vive LA France no Le France
VIVE LA FRANCE! also from america :D
La France !!!!!! Compris
Many people often forget the sheer numerical and economic advantage of the Germans during the war. The French themselves were motivated soldiers, however the Germans had more men they could muster with a population nearly twice as large as the French.
That was how they were able to fight a two front war. Though Russia's problem wasn't the size of their army, but how many troops they can transport to the front at a time. Their logistics were terrible. Soviet Union went on a huge modernization program in the 1930's to prevent this from happening again. Saved their lives by The Second World War.
The first phase of The Winter War was a disaster because of that idiot Voroshilov was given command. He disregarded opening the offensive with a massive artillery barrage because he deemed it ""too pessimistic" He was replaced by Timoshenko who reorganized he attacking army and eventually smashed through the Mannerheim Line. The war ended in victory for The Soviet Union.
Wrong. The war wasn't just France vs. Germany. In reality the allies had numerical superiority on all fronts virtually for the duration of the war. Also, the French did a much better job of harnessing their manpower. Draft dodging was much easier in Germany (keyword: Ersatzreserve), meaning that France (pop: 40m) had an army strength of 4 million and Germany (pop: 67m) had a total strength of only 4.5m at the outbreak of the war. Remember, that they were only able to field part of that army in the west as they also had to defend against the Russians in the East.
The material and economic story is a similar one. Germany may have been the second largest economy in the world (behind the USA, which even before joining was mainly producing for the allies), but the blockade meant that Germany lacked the resources (rubber, various metals, food, fuel, etc.) to fully harness it's economy. Also having to spend a lot of resources synthesizing replacements to resources stopped by the blockade (eg. Ammonia Synthesis). Furthermore it had to compromise between keeping men in the factories or sending them to the front (they had to demobilize a significant portion of their army to keep the factories going).
tl;dr: The allies had the industrial and manpower advantage for the duration of the war. In a war of attrition, time was on the side of the entente.
In 1914 the Germans had more heavy artillery but by 1918, French heavy artillery was unmatched.
DawnOfTheDead991 You may want to look at this beauty
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_de_75_mod%C3%A8le_1897
Remarquable analyse. Merci. Je vous conseille la lecture des «Vainqueurs», du colonel Goya (éditions Tallandier), qui exprime à peu près les mêmes idées. On ne peut que regretter la sclérose qui a gagné en très peu de temps, dans l'entre-deux-guerres, le superbe instrument qu'était devenue l'armée française.
And when the french started to enter Germany, the British and the Americans immediatly forced them to stop. They were scared that France, Belgium, Holland and a part of Germany could unify again like 100 years before under Napoléon.
Absolute bollocks
IroV and then u wake up 😂😂😂
True. France wanted to enter Germany which was stopped by the Entente....
Lol how did this post get so many likes, dudes literally lying
It real. French want invade Berlin. British save their germans cousins ...
Isn't incompetent officers sending thousands and thousands of soldier to their grave the thing you always say?
Almost as much as "heavy casulties for little or no gain"
Karl Eriksson "true story"
Karl Eriksson he does say that a lot
They did, however the war still evolved most of the armies beyond the old way of thinking.
But not as much as "this was modern war"
post-1870: overemphasize morale and offense, underemphasize material and defense
post-1918: underemphasize morale and offense, overemphasize defense
3:40 I guess aiming is overrated?
this is why some wars last so long ! think about some african conflicts and middle east ! they still shoot like that !
Who needs aiming when you have Espirit d' Corps and a firm offensive spirit!
Noscope pro
Suppressive fire!
Jokester The Mighty I noticed that too. 😂
You should do a video on the Foreign Legion.
Yyyyyy do people dislike these fantastic, informative videos!!!?????
Indy, how can I get in touch with you. I have some interesting things to add to your coming Gallipoli specials. It might be of interest. My family fought each other in Gallipoli in opposing sides!
That's cool, are you of Turkish and British descent or something?
that does sound interesting, having family on both sides of that fight
+Estellise Well, this was a rather common thing for Poles who have been drafted to both German and Russian armies.
Jacob Gur He said at the end to get in touch with Flo (one of their producers and social media managers) on social media. I hope you manage to get through to them :)
My grandfather and his brother were in the Ottoman 12th infantry division during the August offensive. My Engish great uncle was with the 7th Manchesters. William Edward Horrock died on the early morning of 7th August. His name is on the cape Helles monument as one of the "missing". My Turkish grandfather was in Suvla at the "W" hills while his brother was at the foothills of Cunuckbair on the 9-10 August. The both survided.
Their decedents, my mother on the Turkish side and my father on the British met and married in Turkey in the Late 50s.
The french gas doctrine would have been nice to mention in this episode, too :)
Weapon Z progam on wikipedia
Napoleon (at a time when muskets could fire three shots per minute at a maximum effective range of 70 yards):
"The moral is to the physical as three to one!"
Germany (when machine guns were capable of firing 300 rounds a minute effectively up to 300 yards):
"Come at me, bro!"
#AskIndie Please do a video about the soldiers from the French Empire. I really love this channel. Thank you.
Hon hon hon 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷
Great respect to France!!!!
cemo1999 thank you,we respect you too!
Thank you pal, the se for you
Robert Balding poor Guy who self like him comment
That was a tough war for France, and an impressive turn around. Great respect indeed.
Till WW2 came. France didn't last a year.
It was Australia though that developed the tactic of Combined Arms that was used to breakthrough the German lines to bring on the Armistice. The first battle using combined arms was Hamel in 1918, and it changed everything.
What a nice episode. In the end, it is logistics that wins a war. The same was true for WW2. Germany's invasion of USSR was doomed from the beginning due to total lack of logistical support.
Or you know being outbumbered in every way by enemies all around you
lamo lambda No,in WW1 it wasn’t during most of 1915-16-17 combined Entente had just 30-40 more divisions than the Germans on Western Front,but by 1918 with Russia’s out of the war that advantage was in German hands until Americans were came in large numbers to counterbalance German superiority in divisions and men.
@@lamolambda8349
In the first stage of Barbarossa the Wehrmacht had numerical Superiority.
Whenever I see those caltrops on Indy's desk I get the shivers... Those would ruin your day...
They won WWI thanks to tactical innovation, and yet lost in 1940 due to lack thereof. It's strange, what changed in the French leadership?
The problem was that the french leadership dndn't change. In 1940 most of the french general (De Lattre de Tassigny, Juin, Mangin) were ww1 veterant who didn't saw that war has change. The only french officer who wanted to make tactic evolved was the colonel De Gaulle.
Im so excited for this Friday, my school is hosting a history conference for the 100 year anniversary of the Great War. HYPE!!!
You are, absolutely, the reason I passed my History exam in High School.
2:25 I’d love a video on German infantry evolution during the Great War.
I hate when people call France "weak" France is a great power and in the the Great War the French were up near the top in military powers.
I wouldn't give it any real thought. Seriously, it's more of a meme now more than anything. Anyone who knows anything about history knows that the French have some of the best victories and leaders under their belt.
Thank you I'm 5% French, it's not a huge number but it's still there. I think the family names were labeau and Beauregard.
Steffen Moore probably rather Lebeau .
Being unable to protect its own country and citizens. If this is not a sign of weakness then I don't know...
You Americans are silly sometimes, how did you even came up with that 5% number?
You're just American, sorry pal, we still love you tho. :)
Are you somehow related to the confederate General P.G. Beauregard?
I made it my goal three years ago to watch every single video on this channel. Every few months I come by and binge a ton of videos in a row. One day I will be done hahah
Could you, after July 28, make a summary for the major improvements in weapons and vehicle technology, battles and political events which you consider to be turning points and generally what you think nations did wrong/right in the war?
I would love an opinion piece from you
Great episode, thank you Fabian Theveneaux!
Wait a minute... Entente victory??? WHAT???
SPOILER ALERT !!!!
What have you done Indy ?! You ruined the suspense.
No Spoiler Alert This is history NOT SOME MOVIE. Anybody with even the most basic knowledge of the First World War should know how it turns out!!!!
thx captain obvious........ read the mood.
Spoiler alert 2 it was just a truce for 22 years.
21 years. Yeah i know it's nitpicking XD
I'm going to Cry when this series finally ends. Quality Information about a War that's commonly brushed over. Thank you Indi and your team of dedicated people who have brought five years of the beat, entertaining information on the The Great War!
Rule 1A of war: Don't dress your soldiers in bright colors.
*French Military in the start of the 20th century* "Meh"
I would say the uniforms they replaced them with weren’t any better. I mean they were better then bright red and darker blue but still not the best.
"Le pantalon rouge c'est la France!"
que l'anglais
Rule 1A of *modern* war ... before that bright colors were the norm and widely used. :)
@Robert of Flanders correction, this was the decision of some French politicians and rightists that believed changing uniform was "unpatriotic".
The French military itself was on the process of testing new uniforms in 1911 and they were very satisfied with them... but then Politic came in.
They rejected those uniforms because the "bleack" color looked like the German uniform, the enemy uniform...
forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=51270
www.alternatehistory.com/forum/attachments/reforme-uniforme-3-jpg.313986/
78.media.tumblr.com/2e488592f07d20322471712c7470d768/tumblr_ou3o6eQpRa1tevf1do3_500.jpg
I was not expecting this video to go into as much detail as it did. Amazing work.
I really wish you guys would do a similar thing but with WW2. Maybe on a seperate channel. As i think it's the biggest advancement in warfare to date.
Not really, modern warfare was BORN in the mud and blood of the WWI battlefields. WWII was simply using a continuation and refinements of the tactics and doctrines that they learned and first applied during the Great War. The reality is that 1914 - 1918 saw quite possibly the most significant shift in weapons, technology and tactics in the history of warfare.
there are some incredible footage and audio in this episode! really well done :)
Vive la france😃
i find these specials about tactics to some of the most interesting :-)
Funny some of the dichotomies that turn up in history... France ended up preparing for the opposite in both world wars... They trained and believed in a war of movement before 1914, and ended up with the stalemate of the trenches, then relied on the fortifications of the Maginot Line for defense in 1940, and got a war of movement that made entrenched fortifications mostly obsolete... Learned all the wrong lessons from history.
Of course politics and finances and the state of the country had a lot to do with it too, particularly in the run-up to World War 2... But lessons learned and military doctrine and planning could have changed the conclusions and direction of preparations in both cases, had the correct conclusions been drawn beforehand...
Later! OL J R
All doctrines were theorized and well thought by french officers. However the officers that were right didn't win the war of influence among their kind.
at bir hakeim the french were outnumbered 1 to 10 and still held the germans and italians 4 weeks, it was all a question of would they manage to pass through at the beginning...
That was one epic ending! Thanks for the great content!
It's interesting to see how quickly the French adapted in WWI given how they refused to do so during WW2. Truly there is no teacher like defeat.
To be fair, they were catching up in 1940. Most of the French arm industry was developping new weapons and materials on par with other nations of the time and some old doctrines were replaced. But alas it came too late.
If the French had managed to stop the breakthrough at Sedan, History would have been different.
Excellent episode ! Cheers Indy ! Thank you for telling me about it before anybody else during the previous fan meeting in Gallipoli-Turkey hurrayyy !!! ;)
Special on the blue devils!
The information in this video is probably the most important of the series and it moved at breakneck speed. I love this channel but this information should have been conveyed in at least 3 videos of the same amount of time. In any case well done! This was an awesome overview
Echt informatives video
I just can't stop looking at indie's right hand just going from on the newspaper to on the table every sentence
Will there be something similair to this of the Belgian army?
A great special, thank you!
You can't just simply win against the French Army, they will always come back and get their victory
Yeah cause it was france vs germany no other nations involved
Well, except in 1940.
Nah if it War was just between Germany and France,France would be collapse in 1915 due to German Fleet will simply blockade every Side of their ports and then German Army could crush them.
Bruce Tucker İt would be in 1914 too but you know that war was Germany VS The World!German Army in 1914 was pretty strong compare with French one in everything with 2 times more artillery and machine guns but there’s a huge Russian bear and BEF and Royal Navy to help France.
@@lamolambda8349 France did carry the Entente war effort in the West until mid 1916 at least
Excellent episode!
Can you guys do a special or a OOTT on the French Blue Devil's
I'd really like to hear you discuss about the importance of the Franco Prussian war and what would have happened if the Prussians had decided not to return Paris. Great great channel.
Do you have something on the "export" of french military doctrin to the est front ? Like general Berthelot in Romania ?
Excellente vidéo, well documented, well narated, thanks
Vive La France !!!
king oreos that translates to live the France which is horrible grammar you could say viva France which translates to live France
That's actually what we French say: "Vive la France", Viva does not exist
It is this type of old (very old in this case) phrasing when you can't really tell the reason, seems like it is a cut version of a longer sentence (which could be "Que vive la France"--> may France live) but it could be understood as "hurray for France" and is a very common sentence. Our presidents for example always conclude their speeches with it. The thing is that, in French, when you refer to France as a subject, or any country, you use the pronoun "Le" or "La" (France --> feminine).
i love france!!! gonna be in verdun 11 of november this year.
I clicked on a Foster the People video and it brought me to this, I have been looking for a World War one video lately though, so i got an entire series.
Will you guys do a Ethiopia special?
Kind of sad how in multiple wars the French have been absolute badasses and pioneers, but seem to fall into complacency and delusions of grandeur during peacetime and have to relearn how to fight modern warfare every time a new war comes around.
As a Brit, and a proud Englishman, I’m well aware that the French were our enemies for 1000 years. But, up until the second Gulf War, I don’t remember any British calling them cowards. The current stereotype of “cheese-eating surrender monkeys” is so far from the truth as to be laughable, it’s wrong, and I blame America for it.
We fought the wrong enemy 1914. I wish we sided with the Kaiser
@@ShireTommy_1916_Somme-Mametz why? We fought to protect Belgian neutrality and because Germany had been threatening our control of the seas for 10 years.
@@keithorbell8946 700k casualties just save poor belgium. Nah never again will British blood be spilt on european soil
Thanks so much for these amazing post!! Watched all of them several times
France is best 💪🏻 On Né Passé Pas!
Haha almost there, you have to write it "On ne passe pas". But nice reference mate ;-)
america already had experience with trench warfare at the siege of petersburg-richmond virginia during the civil war, which is why pershing insisted on a war of movement with renault tanks, as well as the development of small unit tactics emphasizing infantry mortar fire to break entrenched enemy positions
Please do a vid about Hungarian Prime Minister, Tisza István, please!
Awesome video!
If only the French Army of 1939 still had that aggressive elan things would have ended much more differently for the Allies.
In 1939, for the allies against Germany there are several problems
- There is something that everyone forgets: Demography. France suffers from a shortage of men of fighting age. If it mobilizes all its potential, it is the industry that collapses. In short, we had to make choices taking into account the fragility of the available human potential.
- The French Army does not know how to lead an offensive war. She has plans to counter the German attacks. Not to attack. Contrary to what is said, the officers retained the lesson of the First World War. Fire kills, especially at the attacker. It is therefore better to counter-attack than to attack. Doubled because the trauma of the Great War was still present.
- The British Army is not ready at all during the declaration of war. Moreover the Navy (its major component) has a long-term vision with a naval blockade that will kill the German economy (a repeat of the First World War).
That does not prevent that the French do not have to blush of the defeat, they fought like devils. Especially in Dunkirk to cover the retreat. Only, they did with what they had.
Excellent video, well-researched. People tend to confuse the french armies (and general morale) of the two world wars.
Trully the end of the Napoleonic era and the beggining of modern warfare!!!
great episode!
french trucks against german railways, you used that sentence in istanbul!!
Thanks for making this video. My great grandparents from vietnam joined french colonial forces. I can tell that french army and its colonial units held most of the lines on european continent. British fought valiantly mostly on sea but not on ground. And yes i very much detest how the americans reinvent, if not fabricate history. Anyway a youtube channel called ‘simple history’ is impartial and it’s american! That’s really worth watching too.
I can't wait for the 100 year anniversary of the armistice this year!
Outstanding sir. Thank you.
VIVE LA FRANCE 🇫🇷
Great episode! Thanks indi!!
Seems like André Maginot didn't get the fact that France had the potential to defeat Germany with logistics and intiative, and seems like French high command didn't understand, after the disaster of the beginning of WWI, that basing tactics on the previous war wasn't effective...
Let's not blame it all on the military, the 1940 debacle is more of a political one.
As a matter of fact it's often the case with the french their incompetent politicians put them into deadly corners and they had to fight their way out.
For instance in 1870 the french infantry fought gallantly and in may 1940 too. Lower rank officers and men doing their part. The failure was political in all these cases all had to be changed top down in order to regain some semblance of combat efficiency.
That's the french for you, great soldiers but terrible, terrible politics.
Yeah well, the only reason we find it so obvious is because it's in the past, let's not forget it's the whole of Europe that got invaded not just the French.
The Maginot line was actually there to give the french said initiative.
ZenBallMaster42 I meant the offensive initiative.
The Maginot Line was based on a slowing economy and shrinking population; Germany never attacked it from the front, which should have massively-reduced the space that France needed to defend effectively. However:
1.) France had no major reserves behind Belgium, since Gamelin had seen Joffre pull troops off the front to stop the German advance in 1914 and thought he could do the same thing (not realizing how fast tanks and motorized infantry could push). Pulling back was chaotic at best, since German troops on the Belgian and Dutch borders harassed them the whole way.
2.) France had almost no troops defending the Ardennes, where Germany attacked (being even more confused, since the Germans had actually planned on following the Schieffen Plan again until a copy of their plan ended up in Belgium and Erich von Manstein changed the whole thing). Germany kept up the impression with decoy attacks in the Netherlands.
3.) France lacked substantial mobile units, since most of its trucks were in supply depots in France rather than near the front, and its tanks were scattered across the front with infantry units (with only 3 actual armored divisions established by 1940, versus 10 German). French tanks (other than the large numbers of FT-17s still in service) were actually mostly better than German ones, but Germany massed its own tanks.
4.) France and Britain did not coordinate on the ground well, for a variety of reasons (including poor communications, lack of sufficient radio equipment, and the death of one of the senior French commanders on the ground), which was particularly problematic when they tried to counterattack the German breakthrough (the French attacked well before the British and lost, while the British overran their part of the line then drove back and abandoned their gains).
5.) France had too many poorly-trained reserves, whose officers were transferred active-duty servicemen they didn't know, and many had minimal training prior to 1939; many of these units had terrible morale even without going into combat.
6.) Germany had substantial air superiority, as well as far-better coordinated ground forces, with vastly-more radios on the ground for tank, air, and artillery crews to communicate together.
7.) Belgium demanded that France not extend the Maginot along their own border, for some incomprehensible reason.
Hi. Now I´m writing a book that is set during World War One from the perspective of the French army,and I want to show how did they train,but I haven´t found anything about French,If you could help me,i would thank you.Thanks,anyways.