You could cover the case of the NonSequitur show. It includes submitting counterfeit evidence to court. It's Steven McRae vs. Kyle Russell Curtis in the North Carolina Business Court.
How about covering the 1960 movie "Inherit the Wind"? It is a fictionalized version of the Scopes "Monkey Trial" about the first schoolteacher convicted for teaching evolution? Lots of historical legal drama, with some wild turns like the defense attorney calling the prosecutor to the stand.
I’m not a parent so I can’t imagine the pain of losing your child and then to constantly have salt being poured on the wound by being told your pain is not real and you’re faking it. It just seems unfathomably cruel.
The Pozner family having to move 7 times and having to live in hiding is so heart breaking. Can those who are harassing them be arrested or put on a restraining order?
What happened to the family is wrong, Alex is wrong, all that. I will say though that the family moving seven times in the years since the event may not be entirely related to Jones. It could be, but it would take more information to be certain because it could also be a host of other factors that would make more sense.
It really is an indictment on our society. Their child was murdered and then other people sent them death threats for it. That is not the sign of a just and righteous society.
@@JohnDoe-gy5dr I get where you are coming from but in this case Alex pushed the narrative in the first place. Are there whackos that came to the same conclusion on their own? Definitely. But with a leader they can feel justified in their belief and escalate.
I used to watch Alex Jones when I was in my teens, he always said "I have the documents" and "Look it up people" funny how when it actually mattered he could not produce the "documents"
He has actually proved a lot of things right. A lot. And he has provided many documents. Actually he even called the epstein pedo island stuff that was not announced anywhere at all until he said it on joe rogan podcast many years ago.
@@billysonlinesurveychannel8247 maybe that’s why Epstein didn’t sue him for defamation. Pedos don’t like the limelight. But Sandy Hook actually did happen so it’s not the same thing. Alex is a liar pretending he’s a psycho-bat who doesn’t understand what he’s saying. He just won’t turn over the discovery because we’ll find out that he knew exactly what he was doing to these parents and relished it.
@@billysonlinesurveychannel8247 then why won’t he produce these “many documents” in a court room and vindicate himself in these Sandy Hook lawsuits? There’s millions of dollars on the line in four lawsuits. Seems to me if he could prove he as right about Sandy Hook he’d have done it by now.
@@itsabovemenow1016 By the way I am not defending alex jones for the sandy hook thing. He screwed up on that one and deserved to be sued and probably a good beating.
Over the course of the past couple years I’ve learned the statements “the evidence is obvious” or “the evidence is everywhere” is code for “I have no evidence.”
Yeah, if you work with the evidence a lot and think it’s clear, it should not be so onerous to provide a few basic examples to someone who might not know where to look.
Can we just stop and appreciate the progression of Jones's defense? It's gone from, "It's purely entertainment and no rational person could ever take me seriously," to, "I've gone completely insane and now I'm just making things up". And to really highlight how ridiculous this world is, neither of these public statements has affected his audience at all.
Even whatever he'll end up paying out in the lawsuit is probably a drop in the bucket compared to what he earns selling snake oil to his followers. Whatever he pays out will just be a "cost of doing business" for him. Truly the free market at its finest.
The more important legal question is, why are the survivors of sandy hook not suing TH-cam for profiteering off the ramblings of a mad man? They are barred from bringing suit against TH-cam by section 230 of the communications decency act. This may very well be the test case to see if the Supreme Court will hear a challenge to the Communications decency act. Alex Jones may be avoiding piling up legal fees because he is banking on the case being moved to a higher court on appeal. The reality is his is the sole legal target for what should be a class action lawsuit against TH-cam and any other Social Media platforms that profited from the situation.
@@adamkrzewinski9466, GoDaddy can’t be sued if someone uses their services to post child porn under section 230. However, as part of GD’s TOS, you are not allowed to use their services to host illegal content. If we didn’t have Section 230 then almost every online service provider would be sued out of business and into bankruptcy for hosting something that offended someone on their servers that was uploaded by one of their members. There wouldn’t be much of an internet if that happened. That’s why section 230 is important and why SCOTUS won’t rule to overturn it. They’ll kick it back saying that’s up to Congress and/or the FCC.
Jones: *“They didn’t give me the opportunity to defend myself!!!”* Courts: you were given 8 years and exhausted every legal avenue while giving an endless stream of evidence against yourself, attempted to make a mockery of the courts and the legal process and literally gave the private information necessary for your listeners to harass and torment and threaten victims’ surviving family members without a second thought You did all of this to yourself over and over again week after week, month after month, year after year for 8 years. Exactly how much longer did you need to put any significant effort into this case? Jones: 😳🤔… 😡🤬😡🥵😡😡😡
@@philiom7724 Im sorry, you're actually defending Alex Jones? The guy is a professional troll. Regardless of your political views, please try to be critycal about everything. Do not believe pundits at face value.
It sounds honestly worse. That he not only dragged his ass in this case but did so in most of the other cases and that's what lead to him being given a default judgment. Oh, and be sure to not listen to any Alex Jones defenders unless they have actual education credentials. I wouldn't trust anything any of them say unless they can prove they went to law school and simply disagree with this outcome.
Something that popped into my mind that's a good question upon you stating, "Call your lawyer" is "How do you find a good, competent lawyer in the area you live and of practice you need?" Would it be possible for you to do a video on good practices in how to find an attorney in the area a person lives? Red flags that maybe you don't want this person to be your attorney and other general advice?
Good suggestion! But it very likely is specific to your needs. I had 2 different lawyers for my child custody case, the first a fairly mediocre one. Not slimy, but a bit of a jerk. The second one was referred to me by another lawyer. He spent a half hour asking me questions before he even took my case (not charging me for that time). When I asked him why he had asked me all of those questions, he told me he wanted to make sure that I was doing this for my sons sake and not out of spite for my Tyrannosaurus EX. Following his advice, the judge eventually awarded me full physical and legal custody of my son even though I was only asking for 50% on each. It allowed me to have a wonderful child grow up to be a wonderful man in my life. I still remember that lawyer with gratitude and respect for his integrity throughout the entire process. He was never afraid to challenge my assumptions or prejudices, and kept the focus where it should be: The health and well being of my son.
Well, you might not want to go with my father's choice for finding a good lawyer. Which was not show up to a child support adjustment hearing (my father had been unemployed for some time, so my mom was trying to get the payments lowered to something he might actually be able to cover) which ends up with a bench warrant being filed for failure to show up, which means he gets arrested and hey, court appointed lawyer shows up, files some paperwork to get him on disability and hashes out a new deal. Bing bang boom, my mom is finally getting some help paying for my brother and sister's upkeep (I was over 18 at the time all this happened so I didn't count for child support).
I've lost friends because of that.. my sisters were THERE and I've had people swearing that it never happened and they are actors.. and I've told them that my sisters were there and they literally called me a liar.. they didn't even live in CT.. they just read "evidence"
Reminds me of the response given by Rabbi Hugo Gryn (a Holocaust survivor) to a Holocaust denier. *"Look into my eyes, then tell me it never happened."*
The man lines his pockets with money by lying about children getting slaughtered. There's no law that's written to truly deal with this because so few people are this horrible.
@@s0lid_sno0ks His poor mind, under the vile influence of a decent sense of right and wrong and a functional moral compass. It's rich you come in here with that. "You are brainwashed," said you to another because they lamented that children's deaths and their families' grief were called lies.
The press and media screw up people's lives all time based on bad information. Except that Jones blew his own defense up. Otherwise he hadn't done anything that hasn't been done a thousand times. Yellow journalism has always been a thing
I'm from Newtown and was there when the shooting happened. It was horrible. And because of Alex Jones, I had to see people I know be called "crisis actors." Made the whole situation much worse. Hope he has to pay dearly
You know the most infuriating part? He can now say to his fans that he never got to plead his case in court; that the courts didn't even hear his side. What he won't tell them is that it's his fault, and has been for the past 5 years.
Clearly Alex Jones knew what would happen if he showed what he was supposed to. Otherwise he would have just complied. It's so hard to lose these kinds of cases
Yeah, his actions meet even fairly strict definitions of terrorism, so he's gotta know it's better to shut up and take the hit to his bank account than provide more evidence.
It's also possible Alex had such contempt for the court that he refused to comply as a pride maneuver. "Your laws don't apply to me." Sometimes people act on feelings instead of logic. Sometimes it's calculating and sometimes it's just a temper tantrum.
@@dynamicworlds1 terrorism is about using violence for political gain. He’s not trying to change laws or reform “the system.” He’s just a nut job who knows that other nut jobs will swallow everything he says. He’s gotten away with it since the 90s.
All morality issues aside, does anyone know why Jones acted this way with the courts? What could he possibly have gained by ignoring their orders? This can't be just mere incompetence can it?
Probably because the documents requested would have proven, in black and white, what the plaintiffs were saying was true. Because he didn't cooperate he can stand by his assertion that he is being railroaded and his gullible followers will believe him. He has nothing if he loses his audience.
This is just a personal theory, but my opinion is that he has a genuine narcissistic personality disorder. People like him are under the belief that because they are "correct" in everything they say/do, especially ones who believe that divinity is on their side, believe that the laws of mere mortals can't touch them, because said laws are "wrong/the works of the Devil", and therefore can't be successfully used against them.
The fact that Jones is too scared to allow discovery indicates clearly that he knows he won't win on the merits. He's the personification of the loudmouth telling his friends to 'hold me back' from the fight, then claiming how he would have whupped somebody if he hadn't been held back. How despicable of him to be so contemptuous. Hopefully the families take him for everything he's got.
He doesn’t have much to take from what I read. Saw a you tube video where he’s been begging for money for months. He’s divorced so you know that was a haircut. His income is selling those wacky protein powders to gamer boys that can’t get laid.
The plaintiffs seem to think that Jones has deep pockets. They are going after him, and I haven't read where of them sued nor pressed charges against the individuals actually making the death threats. Either they believe Jones has money, or he's the low hanging fruit. Since Jones has five lawyers, I'm inclined to think he is not the low hanging fruit.
The @@lordzaboem Alex Jones is worth about $5 million. That’s not going to cover one judgement against him, let alone four. His legal bills must already exceed his net worth. The point is to financially punish Jones for possibly the rest of his life. Alex Jones days as a millionaire are over. And in Texas it’s a criminal offense to sell off, transfer or hide your assets to get out of paying a judgement. He’s going to have to liquidate whatever he’s got to make a dent in his debt and then about 75% of this future income will be forwarded to pay off the lawsuits. He may not even have a platform where he can rant to his fans and beg for money. Ironically the Sandy Hook parents could end up owning Infowars LLC.
@@itsabovemenow1016 perhaps it's just another Gawker waiting to happen. Infowars will shut down and Jones will start his nonsense again under another name.
Alex Jones' approach is essentially: "I do what I want!" Courts: "No, that's illegal; come see me in my office." AJ: "No!" C: "Okay, then we're suing you for not cooperating." AJ: "See this, everyone? The courts are trying to stifle free speech! I'm a victim! I'm ignoring them!" C: "Alright, you're guilty by default for not showing up." AJ: "I'M SUCH A VICTIM!"
It's petty clear he was trying to monetize, "cancel culture." Have you ever noticed that conservatives are often greatly rewarded for being canceled, no mattet how they earned the criticism that they're calling canceling, or how little consequences that criticism actually brings?
@@DogScience It's not even martyrdom. "Cancellation" is mostly hyperbole about getting harassment on social media. The same people making that hyperbole probably reminisce fondly about previous governments that actually cancelled and/or prosecuted artists for saying things they found problematic.
As a Court Officer in Brazil, I've seen this behaviour from time to time. People think it's stupidity, contempt, or lunacy from the defendant. But mostly, is the defendant realizing he was bound to lose, so he tries to postpone the issue as long as he can, in hope - and delusion - that something external to the lawsuit happens and change the outcome (changes in law, political influence, somebody relevant to the case dying, etc.). It's a strategy, one that rarely works, but it's all the defendant has at that point.
Trump is trying to do that too right now. Him and all his associates who set up the capitol riot. They are getting subpoenas like if its Christmas but they are doing what Alex Jones is doing now: which is buying more time for a battle they will lose.
@@Xerclipse I think they're mostly just hoping the former guy, or someone just as sympathetic to their "cause" is elected in '24 and gives them all a sweeping pardon, and/or flipping house and senate in '22 and could shut the whole committee down, but yeah its the same strategy. If he would of been smart and not only in it for himself (laughable I know) he would of issued lots of blanket pardons on the 7th to everyone involved, but then that would of been admitting any wrongdoing, and wouldn't of looked good in Impeachment the sequel. Unfortunately its a strategy I can see working out just fine for everyone ignoring cogressional subpoenas, but the plebs who actually walked into the capitol will be the only ones more than likely facing any reprecussions.
This being somewhat of a high profile case is I think the only reason this strategy didn't work for Jones. I'm sure it works out frequently when the defendant has a ton of money to spend on lawyers/costs and there isn't a public spotlight on it. I don't know the specifics of this case, but its one the plaintiffs wouldn't of had any problem getting a great lawyer for, even if they had to go the pro bono route, I'm sure there were lots of lawyers willing to take this case, not so much to defend Jones especially not for free.
This is why smart people keep their mouths shut when they’re being sued. Technically nothing you say outside of court is strictly binding, but if the judge gets wind of you consistently calling this a “show trial” or trying to dox or threaten the people suing you, they’re probably more likely to see your actions as malicious rather than merely foolish.
@N Fels So far as I know, generally a judge can’t read a negative inference on a thing you don’t say in criminal cases (pleading the 5th). In civil cases, they probably won’t unless the plaintiff makes a motion for negative inference during discovery. Not responding to a question or demand for evidence during discovery *can* be interpreted negatively. You could make a negative inference about a lack of public comments about a case but I can picture a competent lawyer fending that off. This came up with a piracy case I know of (one of the old Malibu Media cases) when the plaintiff demanded the defendant’s hard drive during discovery, only to find it had been formatted and scrubbed clean. The plaintiffs moved for negative inference on the absence of evidence and got it, since it was formatted after the defendant was served, the judge inferred whatever evidence was on the hard drive must have been negative. I do know the standard of actual malice in libel can take more or less any public statement you make into regard. Alex Jones foolishly conceding the point that he didn’t think that what he said about Sandy Hook was true is a good example, pleading “insanity” aside. That admission undermined his defence that he genuinely believed the things he said were true.
@N Fels - You kind of defeated your own argument by showing exactly WHY you should keep your mouth shut about litigation you are involved in outside of court and legal proceedings. You can't "play back" in court things you didn't say.
@N Fels look at the Kyle rittenhouse trial for an example of the 5th amendment not being able to held against you in court the judge ripped into the prosecution for trying to hold his silence against him
@@envysart797 one of my compsci professors told us about this. He said it was a better idea to damage it severely enough that the data couldn't be accessed, because that could be an "accident" and not deliberate destruction of evidence like wiping the drive would be. Like "oh no, my computer with that hard drive in spontaneously combusted!" Is marginally more believable than "oh, I wiped that drive 8 times so absolutely no data could be recovered on ACCIDENT."
I have a simple theory: if he disclosed, it would ruin him as a fraud to his viewers. Showing how much money he made from them would show he is not one of them and is - in fact - milking them for every dollar possible. It is more lucrative to lie and pay out the families than tell the truth and try to prove his innocence. Purely a theory, no solid evidence to the validity of it.
If they were going to get him for being a fraud, they already would have. He used the, "The Alex Jones on the radio is a character," defense during a custody hearing for his children. The people that listen to him don't care that he's a fraud.
@@scottlemiere2024 yeah but people tend to be a lot more motivated for family than money - being willing to risk exposeure for his children, but not taking the same risk about a lawsuit with no criminal charges makes a lot of sense
I doubt that his listeners/viewers care. At this point conservatives believe all journalists/scholars/historians/writers are lying 100% of the time. They don't believe in anything and are effectively conservative nihilists.
This reminds me of a guy who owed a bunch of money on a construction project, that we sued to recover. We hired very expensive lawyers, when it finally came down to the day of Discovery, the guy showed up at this very expensive Law Office downtown with his lawyer. He literally had nothing. We had pages of documents, statements, invoices, etc. His lawyer, stunned, look at all of our evidence, and just said one word, "settle". He had told his lawyer that we had nothing. In the end, he had to pay every dime, and I'll never get back that two years of my life...just like Alex Jones, I realized he was just full of s*** and had nothing.
I would pay to see the surprised Pikachu face that guy was sporting. What did he expect to happen when he told his lawyer that? And what sort of nincompoop lawyer would come up with literally nothing, even if their client said that opposing council had nothing too?
@@KnakuanaRka that happens a lot actually, sometimes clients just don't answer phones, don't provide the documents we ask for and just try to coast by while we try to salvage everything (it comes to a point where we have to go "it's your money" and just see where things go)
@@luiza.limaneves Hey, a 2 hours ago comment I wouldn't feel bad responding to! I'd love to hear more about your experiences with this (if you feel it's more convenient I'd be happy to toss discord info or such your way). Do you ever "fire" a client the way a doctor can "fire" a patient? Has it ever ended up working out in the end of is it always just an obnoxious amount of work that ends up all for nothing?
@@Dabordi sometimes yes, actually, we have sat down with a few and explained that their non compliance meant we couldn't properly do our jobs (and thank God our contracts have that clause, otherwise it could have been difficult) honestly it's probably why Alex Jones had seven different lawyers during this time
I could show it to you but youtube would delete it the second I try. It's a lot like OJ, there will always be people saying he killed her except now imagine OJ is MSM. That's the mothership, the creaters of the race card themselves. How do you take that down?
Doxing like this should be illegal. You shouldn't be allowed to tell a large audience that someone is lying to the country about a school shooting, and then proceed to give their personal information.
Yeah, I suppose the counter argument is that their address..etc. is presumably publicly available somewhere (if Alex Jones was able to find it himself). However, the counter-argument to _that_ is that it ignores the mob psychology of social media - if you bad mouth somebody online, but make no mention of their personal information, the % of people who are likely to seek that person out is far smaller than if you bad mouth somebody and then say 'by the way, they live at x address'.
I've got to agree. Yes though I don't like that it was used in this way, Alex Jones would be protected for making the accusations with the 1st amendment, but spreading the information of non public individuals for the purpose of sending people to hurt them is defiantly crossing the line.
@mandellorian Its because we have a portion of people in the states who would rather pretend their country is the best than actually make their country the best. The same type of people who villainize people who kneel at a sports game. The kneeling person isn't hating their country, they are pointing out that the country can do better, and should strive to actually do what it says it does. The people who villainize those kneeling persons would rather ignore that the country has a problem.
@@Khronogi And this reason exactly leads some people (Trump) saying "the world is laughing at us". As a resident of the world, yes we are. And you are one of the best reasons for it.
Honestly. Regardless of the law. This was the most despicable thing a person could do to. Accusing people, who have gone through trauma, of faking it for a politcal conspiracy is outrageous.
That's not what happened. If it was it is not even close. Now, pull your head out of your ass tough guy/gal, and do something worthwhile. Go after Hillary Clinton, Obama, and Biden. Anything else. ANYTHING ELSE! You are a joke.
I love how we live in a world where something is bad, someone reflects honestly on it, and people's response is "you really have no idea do you?" This place is so distorted and backwards, it's a wonder 8 billion people still live here.
Brain Force Plus. It’s what Doctor Dude from the University of Falling Off a Surfboard recommends. The immigrants carry brain worms and you have to buy his Brain Force X Plus and tactical taint wipes if you want to survive.
So, basically, Jones behaved like such a massive bellend he managed to negate his 1st amendment rights and kill his own defence. I'm actually impressed.
It’s heart wrenching these parents are not permitted to simply grieve in peace. Having to constantly move homes & look over your shoulder for violent lunatics is unfathomable. Jones created that environment. Jones deserves to be in jail.. more restitution than a mere $fine. (One parent even committed suicide because the grief, and assault on his privacy, was too much to bear.)
@@davidmaitland3238it wasn't his opinion though it was just a lie to help further his career which was found during the discovery process when his lawyer accidentally sent a whole copy of his phone to opposing council. You are also fundamentally misunderstanding the first amendment it shall protect your speech from censorship if it is a matter of opinion but what Alex was commenting wasn't an opinion but claiming them as fact which makes you liable to a defamation lawsuit. As with your understanding of the law defamation lawsuits would be near impossible. Tldr: These aren't opinion they are events in history there are only facts it's not a matter of opinion.
wow i didnt know 27 lives were lost at sandy hook now with loss of a father who took his life because he was stalked and harrassed! thank you for this information.
Wow, sheesh. I can't imagine living all the way in Connecticut and having to fly down to Texas to find a licensed attorney in Texas to file a lawsuit. These poor parents and families were already suffering emotionally. The financial impact is just insult to injury.
While I agree, it shouldn't have been a challenge to find a willing attorney for the case, seeing as the odds of winning the case is quite high, (the attorney's office) big bucks that could be easily reaped from the defendant, the fact that thanks to Jones himself, all the physical evidence needed to go after him is really easy to find/get and the good PR boost. All of these factors makes the case seem like a really hard offer to refuse for any good attorney.
@@WT..... Wym? The entire video above explains exactly why and how it's amazing that Alex Jones ever saw any justice to begin with. It was far from an easy case. If Jones had actually defended himself he probably would have gotten away with it.
He wanted to lie about the families, fine, but encouraging people to send those families death threats? How is that allowable? Why aren't threats taken more seriously? If Someone threatens to kill another person, that ought to have consequences.
Dude on January 6th, we literally had a failed cou de ta attempt, just face it *THE LAW NEVER APPLIES TO, ATL-RIGHT Conservatives* They're welcomed to do and say WHATEVER they so please, *NO MATTER WHO IT OFFENDS, ATTACKS, OR DISRESPECTS*
Odd. Here in Australia if you ignore a court orders (yes Australian judges also dislike this and you should also not piss them off) they just throw you in jail for contempt of court. You can stay there until you do decide to follow the direction of the court. I would have thought the Texas court would have done the same. Throw him in jail and he stay there until he decide to follow the court directions. At this point it goes beyond the civil suit. It about sending a message the court authority must be respected.
They do the same in the US too, but it's up to the judges' discretion on how they want to handle it. The court here stated that this default judgement was done INSTEAD of escalating punishments, which would have ended as you said. As for the "sending a message" part - eh, people disrespect the courts all the time, each judge handles it differently, some have no tolerance, some just want BS cases out of their courtroom.
Although had Alex Jones been sued for defamation in Australia, he most likely would have been able to easily avoid any such consequences and get away with most of his reputation basically unaffected. Australia is well known for having some of the most unreasonably terrible defamation laws(recently amended; late last year but still pretty shockingly bad) in the western world. So thankfully that wasn't the case......
@CarlMatt : these are civil cases involving AJ, which are a different category from criminal cases/law. If it were up to me, I would marry the two law sets.
So you lose your kid, and then you have to move 7 times, because you are harassed and threatened for being an ‘actor’. Jones should be jailed, not just pay a fine…
I am willing to bet that he has decided one of two things. 1) He can make more money off of publicity from defying the court than the fines. 2) The discovery information would contain more damaging information than the cost of any fines. Maybe even criminal. Either way, I see a crowdfunding appeal in the future...
The crowdfunding appeals have been an ongoing sideshow for some time already. Jones is passing the point of diminishing returns, as even his most loyal supporters succumb to wingnut welfare fatigue.
At some point there needs to be a disgorgement based on fraud for his attempt to make money off this. Fraud cannot be allowed to be this profitable, or we’re all kinda screwed.
Makes me wonder if it's possible to enact a penality like: $100M + 200% of gross earnings, retirement, donations, and gifts above $15080/yr (full-time minimum wage) for the next 20 years. Though, he'd probably off himself in under 3 months of being poor 🤷.
Aside from the "He actually bought his own grift" possibility, I think he made the choice he did for practicality. He doesn't want to admit he doesn't have the documents he insisted he had, becuase if he did, he would lose credibility from his fans - and his only income is from extremely dedicated fans who truly believe in him. I think he felt like he was going to lose regardless, but this way, he can slow down the penalty in appeals and keep getting more money from his fan base. Without those core followers, he is out of ANY source of income from a long time and isn't going to be getting new ones. I think he made the practical choice, to be honest.
Imagine going to law school for years, paying tens of thousands of dollars and busting your ass on unpaid internships only to end up with a professional obligation to defend a lying conman who refuses to do the things that will let you do your job and fulfill that obligation. I am surprised we dont hear more stories about lawyers snapping and strangling their clients with their own ties.
I just don't understand how can you ignore courts for YEARS and not be arrested? I can only imagine some common, non-rich and famous person getting absolutely destroyed by the justice system if they tried to pull this shit
He filed appeals and asked for exceptions and it took years to go through them all. He didn't ignore the courts, he exhausted all his legal options THEN ignored the courts.
It probably has to do with the fact that this is a civil lawsuit, not a criminal trial. You can't be arrested for ignoring a civil lawsuit because that's not a crime, but it does mean that you'll automatically lose and be forced to pay damages, probably a fair bit more than you might have paid had you defended yourself and still lost. Which is essentially what happened/is happening here, especially given that the judges are clearly fed up with this guy's antics and unlikely to show him any leniency in assessing damages. What WOULD probably be a crime is if Jones then refused to pay those damages, but that's more likely to result in something like wage garnishments than prison time.
@@CidGregor you're in contempt of court, people get arrested for that, there is a video by Legal eagle about Steven Donziger, he's been arrested for 2 years for contempt. Edit: and I am for Donziger's release, but Legal eagle argued for legitimacy of his arrest for contempt
@@PilsnerGrip No. You're not. Contempt of court is different. Donziger was hiding assets related to a damages ruling. Jones was hiding info pre judgement, which is fine. It's just tantamount to a concession.
I used to have to deal with Alex "Jarhead Jones" Jones when he was a bottom feeding producer at Austin Community Television (ACTV). He was the same then as he is now. When he goes on his incoherent tirades, it's not an act. That's his normal way of existing in the world. When he seems calm and reasonable? THAT'S when he's acting. How someone has managed to become so rich with the blood money he's made and that he's become an existential threat to every democracy in the world using only his diminished capacity, his DSM VI afflictions and his insatiable cravings for attention is a bellwether indicator of just how badly critical thinking in education has failed this nation.
@@lordzaboem After a nanosecond of Google search I found this... _"Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5"_ Contextually this makes sense given the OP questions Jones sanity. Quite rightly IMHO. Seeing as OP is referring to past events, it stands to reason he's referring to an earlier edition. Thus he probably mistyped IV as VI.
It's not like he's made all his money off of that. And why don't you talk about the politicians that lie about dead kids? Like when Bush lied is into war and killed thousands of kids? The babies in incubator thing was all a fake PR stunt to drag us into war so actually Alex does have the right to question it because our government has done way worse than that before.
His choice was show his cards and lose the bluff or refuse to show his cards and lose anyway. One way he keeps the bluff, and the deniability, the persecution narrative, and his fans.
Do you think Alex Jone's present business will not collapse under the weight of the pending judgements. The most he can expect to drag out appeals process is four or five years, with multiple teams of lawyers these cases must be costing him a fortune.
@@katiehettinger7857 don’t underestimate how much capital he’s making, he’s selling 1 dollar supplements for 30 bucks or some shit, he could start a gofundme at any time and get a shid ton of money, he advertises a shid ton too. That guy is making stacks, and even if he starts going broke, his followers will be reinforced in their belief that the government is out to get them or some shid
@@katiehettinger7857 So long as he holds fast to his delusions, his audience will support him no matter what. Because it's never about what is true, it's about what you want people to believe is true. Modern incarnations of Jay Jonah Jameson from Spider-Man are inspired by Alex Jones and we all know how full of shit the former is.
I’ve listened to much of the depositions in this case and coverage of Jones’s reactions via the podcast Knowledge Fight (they also have some recent episodes interviewing one of the plaintiff’s lawyers and it’s legitimately hilarious.) I think we shouldn’t dismiss arrogant idiocy and incompetence here. Jones has dealt with MANY defamation suits before and all settled out of court or eventually gave up trying to make him cooperate. Statements made in depositions and in criminal trials he absolutely couldn’t avoid in the past did serious damage to his reputation, and the reality is that Jones is 100% guilty. He was lying in bad faith and relying mostly on 2 sources who were also lying in bad faith, including one highly unwell man who had a personal vendetta against a sandy hook parent. He DOES have a total disregard for the authority of the legal system, AND he believes that complying with discovery will harm him more than losing the money, AND he is an idiot with incompetent staff who does not keep records of anything and therefore cannot produce them, AND has repeatedly fired lawyers for saying things he doesn’t like. All of the above are absolutely true and evident from what he’s said on his show and in the depositions that did happen. He’s a malicious, narcissistic, stupid scammer, and that’s what honest discovery would reveal, so he stonewalled and hoped they’d give up. I hope they bankrupt him.
@@singjazzy6697 Oh shit, then why didn't he provide this in discovery? Seems pretty damning if you ask me. He should have had a plethora of information to put up then. Do tell how him losing everything once he has to pay the damages and go bankrupt is worth him not providing this "evidence" and winning the court cases?
@@20Tresten Hi Tresten,I don't know why he did not have that but it was maybe the property rights of AIRCRASH INVESTAGATION. But I can tell you that since I watched many of his programs and saw the foolery of the government or whoever. I was shocked. I mean, think about this..if this was to be shown in court, many people would be in a world of hurt. I guess better to send 1 guy down the river than a huge amount of conspirator's who pulled this off. At that time he was showing proof that it was faked or staged with actual video of the crimes. I do'nt care for his personality, but he sure opened my eyes and millions of others. You can call him what you want but he was real good at what he did. BTW. all of the people in sandy hook had their homes paid, but I cannot verify that.
That so many of Jones' followers continue to believe the conspiracy and even defend his actions is evidence of his liability, as well as the lasting harm that needs to be addressed in the penalty.
I remember when Sandy Hook happened so vividly because I working as a server at a restaurant in Rhode Island by the highway, so I met many relatives that were flying into Rhode Island to go to the funerals of the children. It was very emotional 😢.
Imagine not only having your young child gunned down, but having to also constantly be on the run to avoid being killed by people who don't believe it even happened. And all because of a couple psychotic men, one with a gun and one with a radio show. I just hope he doesn't wiggle out of this with some bankruptcy BS.
If there's any justice in this world, he'll end up living under a highway overpass. Of course, there isn't, and he'll probably weasel his way out with minimal losses.
I’m kinda starting to wonder if there should be a hefty fine for defamation. The news tells everyday people something false, and when the courts say it isn’t true, most of those people would rather not believe that what the news said to them was false.
@@beluga2342 Alex Jones endorsed the January 6th riots, in which several people died. That was his crowd. That same crowd sent death threats to the families of the Sandy Hook shooting. They were absolutely in danger.
Frankly, it's ridiculous that Alex Jones has been allowed to thumb his nose at the law for this long. Cases like this only remind us that the law moves swiftly against the poor, and slowly against the rich.
You couldn't be more wrong, Mr Wong. Justice is delayed and denied mostly to the poor who often have no choice but to rot in jail for months or years while awaiting trial with nothing but an unsubstantiated accusation by an officer. Their bails are set at several times their annual salary if not outright denied.
@@s1mph0ny Uhhh, that is exactly the same thing I was saying. You apparently don't know how to read. Congratulations for stupidly telling me I'm wrong for saying the exact same thing you're saying.
I'm not sure he realizes he's been lucky, but I had the exact same thought. If you said even a fraction of the vile things he said to folks IN PERSON, that situation likely ends in the ER.
I find it hilarious when you've got someone claiming "i never said that!" When there's literal video evidence of them saying it. I've seen a republican being interviewed with the same claim and was shown a well known clip of them saying exactly that. They turned around and claimed fake news........ dude there's well known video evidence of it!
You see, when it doesn't say what I want it to say it's just out of context. What is the context? Well, I dunno but I am certain that the statement is out of it.
Most people who have things to be sued over will have some sort of lawyer, even if not one that is likely to be able to defend them from being sued. It's very rare for people without much money to get sued, because there isn't much to fight over. Retirement savings are often exempt from any judgement, as are a single personal home, so most people just don't have much to be sued over.
They gave him like five chances to provide the stuff they asked him for. The funniest thing is that they chose an employee named Rob Dew to be the corporate representative for InfoWars. A corporate representative is required to provide certain information. Rob Dew was unaware of this in the first deposition he did. He was also unaware of this in the second deposition he did despite being informed of it.
Love to see Alex Jones get slapped, but isn't it far more frustrating and sad that this was the "unicorn" of Texas law as that Lawyer put it? If you listen to the things he said and the effects of what he said on these poor families it's annoying that most of the time somebody like him get away with it. And before somebody uses the freedom of speech excuse, there have always been limitations to that freedom, scholastic terrorism should not be considered free speech.
Scholastic terrorism sounds like a formal term for... what happened st Sandy Hook. Stochastic terrorism is what you're looking for: inciting randomized violence against a group without a direct and personalized call to action.
If Alex's wife is reading this: I'm not saying I'll pay you to beat him up, but if you already have any home movies of a beating that has already transpired...
Freedom of speech is a very broad rule. It certainly has its costs. I don't think you can get around it by stuffing all of the costs into a word like stochastic terrorism and calling it a day. It certainly makes things interesting lol
Alex Jones is a hilarious example to study. If you are arguing or debating with someone and they pull any of his famous lines on proof; "I have the Documents" "Look it up" "Do your own research" "Why should i look it up for you?" It is EXTREMELY likely they have no reputable, or qualified sources.
I had a coworker recently claim she had 1500 documents to prove her view was right. Sure you do!!!!! I have been tempted to ask her if she watches Infowars. She has many similar views.
A idiot that should be avoided ... he spreads panic and fear... nothing more. Glad social media has cut him off. Let him sit in disgrace. Humanity is better without him.
Oh god, I've had one of those arguments, with an anti-vaxxer. He told me with a manic gleam in his eye about how much of his own research he'd done, and how I'd be absolutely convinced if he had time to walk me through it all. I just did the carehome-staff thing of nodding politely and going "mmhm".
@@chrisakaschulbus4903 Eh, six of one, half-a-dozen of the other. Remember, this video _also_ points out Alex Jones _lost_ his motion to dismiss charges for being a SLAPP. That means the appellate court found his speech was NOT protected, allowing the defamation cases to proceed. It's not at all unbelievable to think Jones would have lost on the merits at trial had he cooperated.
I'd B more concerned about the surviving parents & other family members of the slain getting both rest & peace ...given that Jones apparently made it his personal mission 2 ensure that, by cowardly using his audience members as proxies, the ones left 2 pick up the pieces of their shattered lives & families would get *neither* rest nor peace. Right wing nut jobs never cease 2 prove that, no matter how vile & disgusting U already think their thinking & behavior is, they can show U just how much more they R capable of.
I will never forget the first time I (unfortunately) became aware of Ms.Taylor-Green. She was running down a street screaming at a teenager like a crazy person. She was screaming that he was a liar and telling him to admit that the school shooting was fake. I am not positive that this was the case she was referring to (if it wasn't please someone let me know).I have never had any reason to doubt that she is bat-shit-crazy since then.
This event was not regarding the Sandy Hook shooting. Taylor-Greene publicly accosted Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting survivor David Hogg with accusations of faking the shooting. A video of the encounter came out on January 28, 2021.
She was chasing down a survivor of the Parkland high school shooting, which at the time of her harassment had only happened one year prior, so not Sandy Hook but still reprehensible
@@zaplepikachu I gotta wonder what was going through her head at that moment. Any person in sound mind would know that a grown woman chasing a teenager down the street and telling him he wasn’t in a life-changing tragedy isn’t a good look. So I wonder what she thought she was doing.
@@paulmahoney7619 I honestly think she believed she was doing a good patriotic act. She has put herself in a mindset where she is the sole defender of America, and anyone who does something she disagrees with is a vile human being, and since she comes from a fundamentalist christian upbringing, she doesn't believe in good or bad in the same way we do. She believes what determines whether an action is good or bad is whether or not they are "saved by god" or doing it "in accordance with god," so any action she takes is a righteous one. It's absolutely terrifying that not only do people with this mindset exist, it is really common in the U.S.
The sad thing is, I don't think it matters how much Alex Jones will have to pay, the damages will never be enough to make up for the psychological terror he has inflicted upon those families. Even more, I'm afraid that just like with a certain recent 'self-defence' case, he won't even have to pay his own legal fees because he can just start a fundraising campaign to get them paid for him. I may seem overly cynical, but honestly, I don't know what else to be these days. The US has gone collectively insane.
Years of harassment, forced to move multiple times, being told that their baby didn't actually die in a horrific shooting, and not being able to peacefully mourn the death of their young child. No amount of money can make up for that. Money won't bring back their baby. Money won't stop the harassment. Alex Jones deserves more punishment than just losing some money.
@@meadRL i dont think the founding fathers would mind i something changes in order to protect people. besides, its not even about changing the amendment, something should be done about it, anything! instead of just sitting idly by as crazy people call deny deaths of innocent children and harass traumatized parents and other victims. as someone whos not from the US its really strange to see people adamantly defend personal freedoms at the prize of dead kids
@@poweroffriendship2.0 he's a terrorist instigator too, and that's probably the evidence that would be revealed as part of the documents he's refusing to submit.
The unfortunate truth is the guy made a lot of money through his show. The lawsuits will be a drop in the bucket for him compared to the money he made through baseless claims.
There is also a clear pattern with this type of claim, Jones has made the same accusations against the families of the flight passengers who died in the 9/11 attacks. He made a lot of money back then pushing all kinds of nonsense. His comeuppance has been due for quite some time.
Jones has been historically right about much more than he has been wrong about. I'm not saying that Sandy Hook did not happen, but it does not take much investigation to see that everything is not on the up and up.
I can only hope his platform finally burns down completely. Other people will lose their jobs too, of course, but at this point I'm not sure that I care. He's a terrible human being and he _needs_ to be punished.
@@scjohnk everything Alex Jones has ever been right about is already open knowledge and easily researchable. It's just nobody cares because it's usually unimportant. If someone like Alex Jones actually had real truth about anything he'd probably be dead
@@bookfound I didn’t say he was right about sandy hook. I’m just saying there is more to it than we were told. I don’t know what that is though, but lots of things don’t add up.
The best part is how people think jones is always right. They forget he says 1,000 conspiracy theories a day, at least one is bound to be true when you’re guessing at over 50,000 a year. Doesn’t make you smart or right, just means you got lucky
In Spain we have the idiom "un reloj parado da la hora correcta dos veces al día" (even a broken clock gives the hour correctly twice a day) for these people.
Honestly, and don’t take this as condonation or suggestion because it’s not, but I’m truly amazed none of the parents snapped and assaulted or killed Alex Jones. I can’t think of many things that are more guaranteed to push someone into temporary insanity than to be harassed, doxxed, threatened, and made fun of immediately after losing your child.
@@chill-lady-brook whether it’s illegal or not isn’t really what I’m getting at. People have straight up murdered child sexual abusers after they learn their child was abused. The observation I’m making has less to do with legality and more to do with human nature’s propensity for violence when goaded beyond reasonable limits. And whether it would solve anything, it certainly wouldn’t, but you and I make that observation as removed non-passionate third parties. Having been close to murders myself (as in, people I know having been either murdered or attempted murdered, not as in me killing other people), I can say for certain that in the throes of anger or hate, it evidently feels for at least some people like “making this one person disappear will solve my problems” So becuase of that, I am legitimately surprised none of the parents were goaded to violence by the absolutely inhuman treatment Jones subjected them to. People have killed for significantly less. Edit: it’s worth remembering that laws don’t prevent people from committing acts. They just spell out the consequences for doing them. You might refrain from committing an act because of those consequences but that’s because *in that moment* the cost benefit analysis doesn’t pan out for you. But in other circumstances people self evidently do the cost benefit analysis and determine it’s worth it to commit the act.
@@chill-lady-brook educational violence does in fact accomplish things, it would make him reconsider similar actions in the future. Violence has been the most effective method of eliciting change In behaviour in our species history
Hypothetically, if I were one of the parents, I would have killed him long ago. But not before torturing him for days and days, recording of course so it could be shared with whomever wanted to watch.
I genuinely hope Alex Jones faces nothing but misfortune for the rest of his life. Constant, inescapable, borderline comedic (to everyone else but him) misfortune.
Too bad no court would judge to seize everything he owns (and I mean everything - really leaving him with nothing) and a life long ban from any kind of media. It would be the right thing though.
That’s probably exactly why he decided to do this. I’m surprised he convinced his attorneys to go along with it. It doesn’t reflect well on them that they refused to answer any of the interrogatories or provide respond to any of the requests for production.
Hi Legal Eagle. I grew up in Newtown and was in school when the shooting occurred. Needless to say, this is some modicum of justice, for my neighbors and community, but if it isn't still just a bitter experience through and through. Thank you for covering this in your very affable way, with integrity the whole way through. Cheers sir.
Really, home addresses are private information in my mind, and should be illegal to share without consent. That's not a matter of free speach, it's a matter of privacy. Like, you're not allowed to show a child's face in a video without written consent from their parents but you can casually tell everyone where they live?
BTW, if anyone is interested in, at least the Austin side of these lawsuits, then both of the plaintiff's attorneys (Mark Bankston and Bill Ogden) have been on the podcast Knowledge Fight, where they have shared some insights in the case, not to mention what went through their heads during the depositions from the case that was made public. Be warned, the episodes (usually named "Formulaic Objections") are anywhere between 2 and 4 hours long xD
@Leslie thats me that's not what she said though. She said to protest them whenever you see them in public. People like you are the reason American conservatives are considered misinformation spreading idiots to us in the rest of the world. You cant argue substance so you lie and misrepresent what was actually said
@Leslie thats me it was covered in the news for months. Google it. There's going to dozens of videos. But since you obviously don't know how Google works I guess I'll go do the "hard" part for you.
The fact that anyone has to live in hiding from the audience of his show should be grounds for legal liability in itself. He has not only failed to manage the mindset of his audience, he has actively encouraged them to become more delusional and dangerous to the public. Someone will, I'm sure, come along to say it's not illegal to encourage people to be delusional and dangerous as long as you don't direct them to take _specific actions._ I assert that it should be.
Which is why European hate speech laws were established the last time fascism had to be supressed by force of arms. I hope we don't need to do it again but it sure looks inevitable and to be even harder this time as they are more organized AND decentralized.
@@SonsOfLorgar: At the very least, doxxing needs to be considered incitement to commit assault. The only reason to publish someone's home address to a group of people who dislike them is to terrorize that person with the possibility that someone will physically threaten their family.
@@SonsOfLorgar: Terrorism is by definition a crime against the State. You can't commit an act of terrorism against an individual. As for incitement to commit homicide, that would be harder to prove than incitement to commit assault. If people should've learned anything from the Kyle Rittenhouse prosecution, it's to not get overly ambitious with the charges. (unless you're trying to lose, which I honestly believe the prosecutor was doing in that case.)
@@deusexaethera No, the only thing I learned from Rittenhouse is that once you start shooting, you keep shooting until anyone who can argue with you is dead.
I apologize for clicking off early on this one. I like to watch your content all the way through because it is very interesting and watching until the end helps with your TH-cam statistics, but what Jones and his followers have done is so disgusting I can't even bear to see justice served to them. Good on you for covering it though.
I feel similarly, but my understanding is that if I mute the sound and open a new tab, I can let LegalEagle's video play through to the end and he will get the statistical benefits without subjecting myself to Jones's vileness. The algorithm can only detect whether the video plays till the end or not.
@ZomPaul your mom never truly cared for you, and only sees you as a way to further her life, instead of seeing you as a whole human. You aren't a whole human, you are a rotten unthinking husk
Speaking of a cell provider you can't mention, just found out that they're starting to collect user info to sell to advertisers, you can opt out but nothing made me want to switch faster than learning that.
I’m so glad he’s going to lose these lawsuits. What he did to those parents who were already grieving the worst possible loss anyone could imagine was beyond description. If we had a rational legal system he would be spending time behind bars for causing intentional emotional distress to families already suffering a terrible loss with his cruel and sadistic lies.
^ Very Bad Take. There's no reason to completely overhaul freedom of speech in america because a few families had their feelings hurt by a lying man. Do you not comprehend the absolute can of worms that would open?? Suddenly people could not speak openly about their opinion on matters where others' feelings are involved. What a terrible idea, putting people behind bars for using words that dont even incite crime... If that were the case, I could say your comment pushes that our legal system is not rational and that as a rational user of that legal system, your words hurt me. Do you deserve to be behind bars? I guess so. Turn yourself in, Eric Dayne.
As always, US-style free speech is double edged sword. In most of Europe - yeah, he'd be sued to hell and back a long ago and honestly, I'm not sure which system is more just
@@BD-lq4id. "There's no reason to completely overhaul freedom of speech in america because a few families had their feelings hurt by a lying man." Jones went beyond hurting "a few families" feelings. He pushed false narratives against them for years which incited his deranged fans to harass, threaten, and stalk these people. The families who didn't put up with Jones' crap and challenged him publicly were his prime targets. All the while he was raking in profits every time he talked about SH on his show. Jones had a profit motive and he didn't care what happened to the families.
I'm just glad that miserable, dumpy little troll of a man finally got some kind of consequence for the absolute toxic waste he spews from his maw every day. It's not going to undo the damage he's done to those families by a long shot, but it's something.
Yeah. I heard that he actually apologized in the podcast (which he shouldn't be here considering that he's banned from any platform including TH-cam) but even if he apologized that doesn't mean he can undo the damage he caused from 2012. He's too late for that.
Sticks and stones... being offended by even the most ridiculous stuff isn't an argument. It just shows weakness. And "i can't deal with mean words" shouldn't be an argument. Especially not a legal one.
@@chrisakaschulbus4903 Look up the term defamation before using shitty takes. There is a reason the people can sue in civil court on it. Sometimes "mean words" can have serious impacts that affect people's livelihood, life, and wellbeing. A prime example are the death threats the families received. Pretty extreme for some "mean words." When you cause serious backlash that hurts someone outside of their feelings, then you should be held accountable.
Seems as though he took advantage of conspiracy theorists and 2nd amendment enthusiasts to make money off them and instead of admitting he knew he was lying for profit, rode it out so as to have those people believe he’s getting screwed by the courts. Then those people would continue to support him bc he fought for what he believed in and deserves support in the wake of his loss
Whoa whoa whoa not all of us 2nd amendment supporters are Alex Jones fans, he is a big red clown and a stain on the conservatives. we could get more ppl on our side or at the very least listen to us if he shut his mouth. What he’s done is despicable, I feel for the families, even if I don’t agree with them politically.
Appeals court will laugh at him as he was nothing but contemptuous of the court system. The record was very clear that he was crapping on the entire process. I see many millions getting sucked out of his bank account. Loving it!
@@Ant-ym3mw “I know you’ve had to move 7 times to avoid my rabid fanbase I keep sicking on you, but I’m WEAAAAWWY SOWWY 🥺 can I not face legal repercussions now?”
My problem with all this is that he's going to spend another ten years appealing first the judgement, then whatever award is granted. These families will likely die before they see a penny from Jones.
@Talsong Kingslayer Not even sure I'd put that much thought into it. I'd probably just fly into a rage and use whatever was at hand - hands included - to do the business.
@@SergeantSniper It's super easy in America. Just buy a gun at your local shop, find him, and blow him away. Time and again, we see that people can murder several others before anyone can stop them, so if you had your sights set on just one person, you could really make sure they're dead before anyone else draws a gun on you.
@Bender Bending Rodriguez ...Do you think knives are magical objects that can cut through anything? Have you never cooked before? The majority of offenses involving a knife in England involve light injuries or no injuries, because it's much easier to deescalate a situation that involves a knife, and much easier for a doctor to treat it. You're not going to find anyone in hospitals who would rather treat gunshot wounds than knife wounds.
Imagine having to suffer through the pain of losing your child, only to have an idiot and his followers claim you're "faking it". What a horrible excuse for a human being
Imagine living in a world where they are actually "faking it" but literally everyone around you refuses to accept the obvious truth that they're being lied to and manipulated. You won't.
@@disabledchatzen5276 The man admitted he was lying in court. He took down the original two videos and tried to claim he never said any such thing until presented with those videos in court. At which point he switched over to "So what if I was lying. Freedom of speech." This is all documented. You can't begin to pretend it's not true. All you can do is deflect and distract and hope some idiot mistakes it all for a valid refutation of easily verified facts
@@disabledchatzen5276 I want you to think about the logistics of such a batshit theory. Not just what Alex Jones said or didn’t say. Think about it mathematically. There were in the ballpark of 300-380 kids at sandy hook, with 30 something teachers. To stage something like this that would mean EVERY single student kid is a crisis actor or paid off, it wouldn’t work if even one of them wasn’t in on it. So that’s hundreds of elementary school aged kids (who aren’t exactly known to be good secret keepers) and 30 teachers who are paid or I guess, threatened to keep their mouths shut for years. Not even mafia families can keep their secrets with less people in the organization and the threat of death for those who snitch. So what makes you think 300 kids and 30 teachers are able to keep a massive secret for a decade?
What's so difficult about the difference between free speech and deformation/harassment? Sharing an opinion is one thing, continually spreading misinformation, inciting violence by sharing addresses, and so on, is far from sharing you speech, it's blatant intentional targeting to damage. Is it not?
The Bill of Rights is sadly not taught in complete thoroughness in US public education. They only quiz us on the general details, and rarely are people taught how to interpret legalese. So not many people are privy to the limitations of their legal protections (unless they themselves study it), and quite frankly the US government and corporations benefit from this ignorance.
The Nazis fought misinformation pretty fiercely too. He never shared any addresses. He never called for violence against anyone. Lies, my man. Lies. It's all a big stinking pile of bs.
@@philiom7724 Straight to Godwin, hey? Was Jones lying when he described the families as crisis actors? Is is just a coincidence that the family has received threats such that they had to move several times. Even if Jones didn't directly call for violence, expressing that narrative to the kind of radicalised audience that he has developed was inevitably going to lead to threats, if not violence. You seem pretty-well mired in BS yourself.
I'll have to poke a hole there "Spreading misinformation" can literally just be interpreted as "Sharing a wrong opinion" Free speech does include the right to be wrong about things. The rest is far from free speech, but this first bit is a slippery slope that goes all the way down to hell.
I'm all for free speech, but he caused these people who just lost their kids and loved ones to be harassed to the point they had to move. He put out their private information. That is malicious. Even if a person thought it was a hoax, a decent person wouldn't do this just in case they were wrong.
I believe that everyone should have the right to do whatever they want, as long as they are not hurting any other people through their words or actions. The instant you start harming others, your rights end.
@@scottlemiere2024 according to wikipedia, Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising. Defamation that causes harm to reputation is a tort and also an exception to free speech. So, it protects a lot but there's some it doesn't protect when it cause harm or breaks the law.
Been there. It sucks. I feel even more for these families, though. Losing a child is a life-shattering tragedy. I don't know why or how people come up with these batshit crazy conspiracy theories that people are lying about their children dying in a school shooting. Alex Jones should be facing criminal charges, especially for doxxing a family so much they had to move *seven times* because of *death threats.* That's putting them in real physical harm, as if the emotional damage isn't bad enough. I hope there's more lawsuits and I hope he loses ALL of them.
Maybe Jones wanted this to happen. Hear me out. If he knew he would lose this case either way, he might have calculated it was better to lose this case in an obscure and confusing way that he could later tell his fans was unfair. That would at least protect his reputation with his fan base, even if he was forced to pay out some money.
Yup. Instead of having to go on the stand and admit that he made everything up, now he can claim "They denied me due process because they were terrified when I went on the stand that I would blow the lid off their conspiracy!"
@@aniyn Indeed ... In fact I equally see him rant to his audience that they "cut out my tongue, as they were afraid of what I had to say" ... ... despite the Court issuing the default judgement is in Texas, not exactly a Democrat State, and possibly has the most liberal gun laws out there ... ... in fact, the judge issuing the default judgment likely votes Republican consistently, meaning him (Alex 'Apocalyptica' Jones ...) complaining about the judge being a "Liberal and Progressive" for "what he did to me", is simply not true ... But, above all else, what I can hum doing next is expanding his conspiracy to the US Judicial system. Thus it isn't just the Executive, and the Legislature, but now the Judiciary, all part of the secret cabal to curtail American Citizens of their Constitutional Rights and Freedoms (but saying nothing about the concurrent Responsibilities that come with both ...) ... In fact, I'm pretty sure he will intensify his belief that the Federal Executive, Legislature, and now Judiciary, all created 'False Flag' School, and Mass, Shooting Events, to limit 2A rights, as part of a very long-term conspiracy to finally take over the entire Government, and the United States ...
Alex Jones "I am above the law" Every judge ever "No you're not" I'm getting sick and tired of these sovereign citizens morons. In the end all they do is waste time and annoy anyone who actually respects the law
he posted a persons address, knowing people wanted to harasse them, why isnt he in jail? like this person, jones, is vomit. harassing people is a crime, isnt it ?
I'm willing to fly from CT to Texas specifically to mock him at his home. At some point you get real tired of idiots thinking they can do what ever they want. Commenting about the issues only goes so far, Real change in this country has to happen soon or were all doomed.
And looking at some of the replies to comments on this very video. It worked. It's grotesque and unfortunate cause even if Alex were to completely vanish, there's plenty of other slimy exploitive folks out there ready to take his followers down the next insane rabbit hole.
@@cheese5728 you know...I never see any of you posting your comments directly. I always find you lurking under the comments of other people like roaches. Scattering when exposed to the light of information and knowledge. Your opinions never change from blind ignorance instead of adapting to new information. Jones had every opportunity to provide the evidence he claimed and refused to do so. Now he suffers the consequences
@@3baxcb Yeah. It's even better to see other right-wing reactionary community losing their minds over Alex Jones being locked behind bars. Why? Because they are the ones who gave Alex the platform on TH-cam via podcast. I heard that he actually apologized about the Sandy Hooks shooting in the podcast but I doubt people will ever forgive him. So his apologies is way too late.
Two amazing interviews with one of the families’ attorneys, Mark Bankston, on the Knowledge Fight podcast. I’d highly recommend everyone listen to them- the guy does an excellent job of threading the needle between humor and pathos/anger.
🇺🇸 What should I cover next?
☎ Get $25 off of your first month with Ting Mobile legaleagle.link/ting
Age gap romance?
What are the legal implications of NFT's? I think the answer might be "none," but even that could be interesting.
You could cover the case of the NonSequitur show. It includes submitting counterfeit evidence to court.
It's Steven McRae vs. Kyle Russell Curtis in the North Carolina Business Court.
Have you looked at National Treasure from a legal standpoint? I love the movie, but they break a lot of laws.
How about covering the 1960 movie "Inherit the Wind"? It is a fictionalized version of the Scopes "Monkey Trial" about the first schoolteacher convicted for teaching evolution? Lots of historical legal drama, with some wild turns like the defense attorney calling the prosecutor to the stand.
I’m not a parent so I can’t imagine the pain of losing your child and then to constantly have salt being poured on the wound by being told your pain is not real and you’re faking it. It just seems unfathomably cruel.
I think that's what he wanted though. This way he can claim the court took away his rights, and his supporters will believe him.
@@Will-tn8kq "The court took away my rights!" [because I ignored the court mandates]
Jones' flying monkeys have hounded the Sandy Hook parents with death threats.
it's weird that there's no US law to prosecute that
No no no no no..... it's "Compassionate Conservatism[tm]"
@@lohphat bush2 was criticized by gop for that phrase.
bc it implied conservatism wasn't ALREADY compaassionate.
The Pozner family having to move 7 times and having to live in hiding is so heart breaking. Can those who are harassing them be arrested or put on a restraining order?
What happened to the family is wrong, Alex is wrong, all that. I will say though that the family moving seven times in the years since the event may not be entirely related to Jones. It could be, but it would take more information to be certain because it could also be a host of other factors that would make more sense.
@@JohnDoe-gy5dr you may want evidence before making such claims
It really is an indictment on our society. Their child was murdered and then other people sent them death threats for it. That is not the sign of a just and righteous society.
@@JohnDoe-gy5dr I get where you are coming from but in this case Alex pushed the narrative in the first place. Are there whackos that came to the same conclusion on their own? Definitely. But with a leader they can feel justified in their belief and escalate.
Only the ones that make themselves known
I used to watch Alex Jones when I was in my teens, he always said "I have the documents" and "Look it up people" funny how when it actually mattered he could not produce the "documents"
He has actually proved a lot of things right. A lot. And he has provided many documents. Actually he even called the epstein pedo island stuff that was not announced anywhere at all until he said it on joe rogan podcast many years ago.
@@billysonlinesurveychannel8247 maybe that’s why Epstein didn’t sue him for defamation. Pedos don’t like the limelight. But Sandy Hook actually did happen so it’s not the same thing. Alex is a liar pretending he’s a psycho-bat who doesn’t understand what he’s saying. He just won’t turn over the discovery because we’ll find out that he knew exactly what he was doing to these parents and relished it.
@@billysonlinesurveychannel8247 then why won’t he produce these “many documents” in a court room and vindicate himself in these Sandy Hook lawsuits? There’s millions of dollars on the line in four lawsuits. Seems to me if he could prove he as right about Sandy Hook he’d have done it by now.
@@itsabovemenow1016 By the way I am not defending alex jones for the sandy hook thing. He screwed up on that one and deserved to be sued and probably a good beating.
@@billysonlinesurveychannel8247 being right about something in the past doesn't give you the freedom to spread harmful lies in the future.
Over the course of the past couple years I’ve learned the statements “the evidence is obvious” or “the evidence is everywhere” is code for “I have no evidence.”
Dealing with people enriched with the wisdom of Q? Ha ha ha
Yeah, if you work with the evidence a lot and think it’s clear, it should not be so onerous to provide a few basic examples to someone who might not know where to look.
Got Q but no I.....lmfao !!!
It's easy. In any argument online or offline, ask them about the actual source. If they say anything without providing the actual source: it's a lie.
@vlecxius ohh, sunshine, they have sources .
Can we just stop and appreciate the progression of Jones's defense? It's gone from, "It's purely entertainment and no rational person could ever take me seriously," to, "I've gone completely insane and now I'm just making things up". And to really highlight how ridiculous this world is, neither of these public statements has affected his audience at all.
Even whatever he'll end up paying out in the lawsuit is probably a drop in the bucket compared to what he earns selling snake oil to his followers. Whatever he pays out will just be a "cost of doing business" for him. Truly the free market at its finest.
@@gorak9000 I looked it up, apparently his net worth is 15 million. Being an internet whacko is very lucrative apparently
The more important legal question is, why are the survivors of sandy hook not suing TH-cam for profiteering off the ramblings of a mad man? They are barred from bringing suit against TH-cam by section 230 of the communications decency act. This may very well be the test case to see if the Supreme Court will hear a challenge to the Communications decency act. Alex Jones may be avoiding piling up legal fees because he is banking on the case being moved to a higher court on appeal. The reality is his is the sole legal target for what should be a class action lawsuit against TH-cam and any other Social Media platforms that profited from the situation.
@@adamkrzewinski9466, GoDaddy can’t be sued if someone uses their services to post child porn under section 230.
However, as part of GD’s TOS, you are not allowed to use their services to host illegal content.
If we didn’t have Section 230 then almost every online service provider would be sued out of business and into bankruptcy for hosting something that offended someone on their servers that was uploaded by one of their members.
There wouldn’t be much of an internet if that happened. That’s why section 230 is important and why SCOTUS won’t rule to overturn it. They’ll kick it back saying that’s up to Congress and/or the FCC.
@@NewNormalWorldOrder How's the flat earth working out for you? please step off the edge post haste.
Jones: *“They didn’t give me the opportunity to defend myself!!!”*
Courts: you were given 8 years and exhausted every legal avenue while giving an endless stream of evidence against yourself, attempted to make a mockery of the courts and the legal process and literally gave the private information necessary for your listeners to harass and torment and threaten victims’ surviving family members without a second thought
You did all of this to yourself over and over again week after week, month after month, year after year for 8 years. Exactly how much longer did you need to put any significant effort into this case?
Jones: 😳🤔… 😡🤬😡🥵😡😡😡
None of that is true.
@@philiom7724 No? The part of him doxing the victims, that was made up by LegalEagle here?
@@philiom7724 All of it is true. And I have made a case just as good as yours. Better, because mine does not rely on the word of Alex Jones.
@@philiom7724 Im sorry, you're actually defending Alex Jones? The guy is a professional troll. Regardless of your political views, please try to be critycal about everything. Do not believe pundits at face value.
It sounds honestly worse. That he not only dragged his ass in this case but did so in most of the other cases and that's what lead to him being given a default judgment. Oh, and be sure to not listen to any Alex Jones defenders unless they have actual education credentials. I wouldn't trust anything any of them say unless they can prove they went to law school and simply disagree with this outcome.
Something that popped into my mind that's a good question upon you stating, "Call your lawyer" is "How do you find a good, competent lawyer in the area you live and of practice you need?" Would it be possible for you to do a video on good practices in how to find an attorney in the area a person lives? Red flags that maybe you don't want this person to be your attorney and other general advice?
Good suggestion! But it very likely is specific to your needs. I had 2 different lawyers for my child custody case, the first a fairly mediocre one. Not slimy, but a bit of a jerk. The second one was referred to me by another lawyer. He spent a half hour asking me questions before he even took my case (not charging me for that time). When I asked him why he had asked me all of those questions, he told me he wanted to make sure that I was doing this for my sons sake and not out of spite for my Tyrannosaurus EX. Following his advice, the judge eventually awarded me full physical and legal custody of my son even though I was only asking for 50% on each. It allowed me to have a wonderful child grow up to be a wonderful man in my life. I still remember that lawyer with gratitude and respect for his integrity throughout the entire process. He was never afraid to challenge my assumptions or prejudices, and kept the focus where it should be: The health and well being of my son.
Well, you might not want to go with my father's choice for finding a good lawyer. Which was not show up to a child support adjustment hearing (my father had been unemployed for some time, so my mom was trying to get the payments lowered to something he might actually be able to cover) which ends up with a bench warrant being filed for failure to show up, which means he gets arrested and hey, court appointed lawyer shows up, files some paperwork to get him on disability and hashes out a new deal. Bing bang boom, my mom is finally getting some help paying for my brother and sister's upkeep (I was over 18 at the time all this happened so I didn't count for child support).
Oops, there's a typo there, that should read "No, money down!" - oh and that bar association logo shouldn't be there either.
@@GoCoyote that lawyer sounds like a great person, makes the story pretty wholesome.
@@gorak9000 Lionel Hutz, Attorney at Law!! 🤣🤣
I've lost friends because of that.. my sisters were THERE and I've had people swearing that it never happened and they are actors.. and I've told them that my sisters were there and they literally called me a liar.. they didn't even live in CT.. they just read "evidence"
They are crysis actors.
I’m sorry you went through that
You the most lyinest liar that ever lied, boy.
Reminds me of the response given by Rabbi Hugo Gryn (a Holocaust survivor) to a Holocaust denier. *"Look into my eyes, then tell me it never happened."*
@@PonderingStudentdamn. That goes hard.
The man lines his pockets with money by lying about children getting slaughtered. There's no law that's written to truly deal with this because so few people are this horrible.
You are brainwashed.
@@s0lid_sno0ks His poor mind, under the vile influence of a decent sense of right and wrong and a functional moral compass.
It's rich you come in here with that. "You are brainwashed," said you to another because they lamented that children's deaths and their families' grief were called lies.
@@s0lid_sno0ks You let that kettle know who's black around here
ur so indoctrinated its sad
What confuses me are the people commenting that you're brainwashed....brainwashed by what?
These people lost their CHILDREN and had to move every damn year to escape these depraved creeps it‘s just disgusting
The press and media screw up people's lives all time based on bad information. Except that Jones blew his own defense up. Otherwise he hadn't done anything that hasn't been done a thousand times. Yellow journalism has always been a thing
@@8bitorgy doesn't make it less disgusting though
False Flag.
@@8bitorgy Except no. I would love an example.
@@rotary7372 Richard Jewell
I'm from Newtown and was there when the shooting happened. It was horrible. And because of Alex Jones, I had to see people I know be called "crisis actors." Made the whole situation much worse. Hope he has to pay dearly
i do too, he shouldn't be allowed to have a podcast after this imo
Ya sure?
@@og-ghostblinky6252 Oh look a Q-drop in the comments
The actor that came on the news literally was smiling before he got the mic then he started crying...
@@Rennar3210 what's a Q drop?
You know the most infuriating part? He can now say to his fans that he never got to plead his case in court; that the courts didn't even hear his side. What he won't tell them is that it's his fault, and has been for the past 5 years.
It's very fishy. Probably because they WERE crysis actors...
@@grilleFire Don't know if your comment is serious but XDDDD
@@MorganEdgy same here. I can't tell
No, because the law is very clear. If you don’t show up, they can rule against you by default.
@@easyenetwork2023 but that’s not what he would say, which is their point
Clearly Alex Jones knew what would happen if he showed what he was supposed to. Otherwise he would have just complied. It's so hard to lose these kinds of cases
I think he trying avoid criminal charges from that evidence.
@@Mayurbhedru He deserves to be in prison.
Yeah, his actions meet even fairly strict definitions of terrorism, so he's gotta know it's better to shut up and take the hit to his bank account than provide more evidence.
It's also possible Alex had such contempt for the court that he refused to comply as a pride maneuver. "Your laws don't apply to me." Sometimes people act on feelings instead of logic. Sometimes it's calculating and sometimes it's just a temper tantrum.
@@dynamicworlds1 terrorism is about using violence for political gain.
He’s not trying to change laws or reform “the system.”
He’s just a nut job who knows that other nut jobs will swallow everything he says. He’s gotten away with it since the 90s.
All morality issues aside, does anyone know why Jones acted this way with the courts? What could he possibly have gained by ignoring their orders? This can't be just mere incompetence can it?
It was the frogs
Probably because the documents requested would have proven, in black and white, what the plaintiffs were saying was true. Because he didn't cooperate he can stand by his assertion that he is being railroaded and his gullible followers will believe him. He has nothing if he loses his audience.
This is just a personal theory, but my opinion is that he has a genuine narcissistic personality disorder. People like him are under the belief that because they are "correct" in everything they say/do, especially ones who believe that divinity is on their side, believe that the laws of mere mortals can't touch them, because said laws are "wrong/the works of the Devil", and therefore can't be successfully used against them.
Because it's what his followers want. They don't actually want to see the "proof" they just want to see him "fighting" for them.
the damage the requested documents would inflict would exceed the damage of whatever the courts determine he must pay
The fact that Jones is too scared to allow discovery indicates clearly that he knows he won't win on the merits. He's the personification of the loudmouth telling his friends to 'hold me back' from the fight, then claiming how he would have whupped somebody if he hadn't been held back. How despicable of him to be so contemptuous. Hopefully the families take him for everything he's got.
He doesn’t have much to take from what I read. Saw a you tube video where he’s been begging for money for months. He’s divorced so you know that was a haircut. His income is selling those wacky protein powders to gamer boys that can’t get laid.
The plaintiffs seem to think that Jones has deep pockets. They are going after him, and I haven't read where of them sued nor pressed charges against the individuals actually making the death threats. Either they believe Jones has money, or he's the low hanging fruit. Since Jones has five lawyers, I'm inclined to think he is not the low hanging fruit.
The @@lordzaboem Alex Jones is worth about $5 million. That’s not going to cover one judgement against him, let alone four. His legal bills must already exceed his net worth. The point is to financially punish Jones for possibly the rest of his life. Alex Jones days as a millionaire are over. And in Texas it’s a criminal offense to sell off, transfer or hide your assets to get out of paying a judgement. He’s going to have to liquidate whatever he’s got to make a dent in his debt and then about 75% of this future income will be forwarded to pay off the lawsuits. He may not even have a platform where he can rant to his fans and beg for money. Ironically the Sandy Hook parents could end up owning Infowars LLC.
Alex Jones is basically Charles Manson at this point
@@itsabovemenow1016 perhaps it's just another Gawker waiting to happen. Infowars will shut down and Jones will start his nonsense again under another name.
Alex Jones' approach is essentially:
"I do what I want!"
Courts: "No, that's illegal; come see me in my office."
AJ: "No!"
C: "Okay, then we're suing you for not cooperating."
AJ: "See this, everyone? The courts are trying to stifle free speech! I'm a victim! I'm ignoring them!"
C: "Alright, you're guilty by default for not showing up."
AJ: "I'M SUCH A VICTIM!"
That's the entire understanding of "freedom" that US conservatives have. Alex Jones is just one that took to conspiranoics for profit.
I know where Alex Jones work due to several friends working for him but even I don’t stoop so low to dox. Him
It's petty clear he was trying to monetize, "cancel culture."
Have you ever noticed that conservatives are often greatly rewarded for being canceled, no mattet how they earned the criticism that they're calling canceling, or how little consequences that criticism actually brings?
@@UsenameTakenWasTaken wow like intentional martyrdom? I could see that. Thats wild.
@@DogScience It's not even martyrdom. "Cancellation" is mostly hyperbole about getting harassment on social media. The same people making that hyperbole probably reminisce fondly about previous governments that actually cancelled and/or prosecuted artists for saying things they found problematic.
As a Court Officer in Brazil, I've seen this behaviour from time to time. People think it's stupidity, contempt, or lunacy from the defendant. But mostly, is the defendant realizing he was bound to lose, so he tries to postpone the issue as long as he can, in hope - and delusion - that something external to the lawsuit happens and change the outcome (changes in law, political influence, somebody relevant to the case dying, etc.). It's a strategy, one that rarely works, but it's all the defendant has at that point.
Wow. That makes sense I guess, but it's a real dick move.
@@samvsmedia8680 Being Alex Jones is a real dick move
Trump is trying to do that too right now. Him and all his associates who set up the capitol riot. They are getting subpoenas like if its Christmas but they are doing what Alex Jones is doing now: which is buying more time for a battle they will lose.
@@Xerclipse I think they're mostly just hoping the former guy, or someone just as sympathetic to their "cause" is elected in '24 and gives them all a sweeping pardon, and/or flipping house and senate in '22 and could shut the whole committee down, but yeah its the same strategy. If he would of been smart and not only in it for himself (laughable I know) he would of issued lots of blanket pardons on the 7th to everyone involved, but then that would of been admitting any wrongdoing, and wouldn't of looked good in Impeachment the sequel. Unfortunately its a strategy I can see working out just fine for everyone ignoring cogressional subpoenas, but the plebs who actually walked into the capitol will be the only ones more than likely facing any reprecussions.
This being somewhat of a high profile case is I think the only reason this strategy didn't work for Jones. I'm sure it works out frequently when the defendant has a ton of money to spend on lawyers/costs and there isn't a public spotlight on it. I don't know the specifics of this case, but its one the plaintiffs wouldn't of had any problem getting a great lawyer for, even if they had to go the pro bono route, I'm sure there were lots of lawyers willing to take this case, not so much to defend Jones especially not for free.
This is why smart people keep their mouths shut when they’re being sued.
Technically nothing you say outside of court is strictly binding, but if the judge gets wind of you consistently calling this a “show trial” or trying to dox or threaten the people suing you, they’re probably more likely to see your actions as malicious rather than merely foolish.
@N Fels So far as I know, generally a judge can’t read a negative inference on a thing you don’t say in criminal cases (pleading the 5th). In civil cases, they probably won’t unless the plaintiff makes a motion for negative inference during discovery. Not responding to a question or demand for evidence during discovery *can* be interpreted negatively. You could make a negative inference about a lack of public comments about a case but I can picture a competent lawyer fending that off.
This came up with a piracy case I know of (one of the old Malibu Media cases) when the plaintiff demanded the defendant’s hard drive during discovery, only to find it had been formatted and scrubbed clean. The plaintiffs moved for negative inference on the absence of evidence and got it, since it was formatted after the defendant was served, the judge inferred whatever evidence was on the hard drive must have been negative.
I do know the standard of actual malice in libel can take more or less any public statement you make into regard. Alex Jones foolishly conceding the point that he didn’t think that what he said about Sandy Hook was true is a good example, pleading “insanity” aside. That admission undermined his defence that he genuinely believed the things he said were true.
@N Fels - You kind of defeated your own argument by showing exactly WHY you should keep your mouth shut about litigation you are involved in outside of court and legal proceedings. You can't "play back" in court things you didn't say.
See also Hughes, Akilah.
@N Fels look at the Kyle rittenhouse trial for an example of the 5th amendment not being able to held against you in court the judge ripped into the prosecution for trying to hold his silence against him
@@envysart797 one of my compsci professors told us about this. He said it was a better idea to damage it severely enough that the data couldn't be accessed, because that could be an "accident" and not deliberate destruction of evidence like wiping the drive would be.
Like "oh no, my computer with that hard drive in spontaneously combusted!" Is marginally more believable than "oh, I wiped that drive 8 times so absolutely no data could be recovered on ACCIDENT."
I have a simple theory: if he disclosed, it would ruin him as a fraud to his viewers. Showing how much money he made from them would show he is not one of them and is - in fact - milking them for every dollar possible. It is more lucrative to lie and pay out the families than tell the truth and try to prove his innocence. Purely a theory, no solid evidence to the validity of it.
If they were going to get him for being a fraud, they already would have. He used the, "The Alex Jones on the radio is a character," defense during a custody hearing for his children.
The people that listen to him don't care that he's a fraud.
So he doubled down because he thought keeping his fanbase was more important than siding with relatives of murder victims. Absolute ghoul of a person.
It might not even be that lucrative; it seems very likely that with these trials, this could ruin Jones financially. And I am here for it.
@@scottlemiere2024 yeah but people tend to be a lot more motivated for family than money - being willing to risk exposeure for his children, but not taking the same risk about a lawsuit with no criminal charges makes a lot of sense
I doubt that his listeners/viewers care. At this point conservatives believe all journalists/scholars/historians/writers are lying 100% of the time. They don't believe in anything and are effectively conservative nihilists.
Well I'm sure he'll find a way out of this. It's not like the plaintiffs have access to his entire cell phone.
*Smiles in Perry Mason moment*
Narrator: "In point of fact..."
This reminds me of a guy who owed a bunch of money on a construction project, that we sued to recover. We hired very expensive lawyers, when it finally came down to the day of Discovery, the guy showed up at this very expensive Law Office downtown with his lawyer. He literally had nothing. We had pages of documents, statements, invoices, etc. His lawyer, stunned, look at all of our evidence, and just said one word, "settle". He had told his lawyer that we had nothing. In the end, he had to pay every dime, and I'll never get back that two years of my life...just like Alex Jones, I realized he was just full of s*** and had nothing.
I would pay to see the surprised Pikachu face that guy was sporting. What did he expect to happen when he told his lawyer that? And what sort of nincompoop lawyer would come up with literally nothing, even if their client said that opposing council had nothing too?
@@KnakuanaRka that happens a lot actually, sometimes clients just don't answer phones, don't provide the documents we ask for and just try to coast by while we try to salvage everything (it comes to a point where we have to go "it's your money" and just see where things go)
@@luiza.limaneves Hey, a 2 hours ago comment I wouldn't feel bad responding to!
I'd love to hear more about your experiences with this (if you feel it's more convenient I'd be happy to toss discord info or such your way). Do you ever "fire" a client the way a doctor can "fire" a patient? Has it ever ended up working out in the end of is it always just an obnoxious amount of work that ends up all for nothing?
@@Dabordi sometimes yes, actually, we have sat down with a few and explained that their non compliance meant we couldn't properly do our jobs (and thank God our contracts have that clause, otherwise it could have been difficult) honestly it's probably why Alex Jones had seven different lawyers during this time
Unless that guy was forced to pay punitive damages, it was totally worth it for him to fight and hide his money.
If the evidence was so ‘overwhelming’ like Alex claimed, then why couldn’t he share it? Man he really is crazy
I could show it to you but youtube would delete it the second I try. It's a lot like OJ, there will always be people saying he killed her except now imagine OJ is MSM. That's the mothership, the creaters of the race card themselves. How do you take that down?
@@Flyeaglesfly00 Try.
@@Flyeaglesfly00 So youtube's going to delete documents submitted to court?
@@Flyeaglesfly00 you TOTALLY have the info and aren't bullshitting everything
@@Flyeaglesfly00 so Alex needs to write a book explaining how he got away with a crime and title it "IF I did this"
Doxing like this should be illegal. You shouldn't be allowed to tell a large audience that someone is lying to the country about a school shooting, and then proceed to give their personal information.
Yeah, I suppose the counter argument is that their address..etc. is presumably publicly available somewhere (if Alex Jones was able to find it himself). However, the counter-argument to _that_ is that it ignores the mob psychology of social media - if you bad mouth somebody online, but make no mention of their personal information, the % of people who are likely to seek that person out is far smaller than if you bad mouth somebody and then say 'by the way, they live at x address'.
I've got to agree. Yes though I don't like that it was used in this way, Alex Jones would be protected for making the accusations with the 1st amendment, but spreading the information of non public individuals for the purpose of sending people to hurt them is defiantly crossing the line.
@mandellorian Its because we have a portion of people in the states who would rather pretend their country is the best than actually make their country the best. The same type of people who villainize people who kneel at a sports game. The kneeling person isn't hating their country, they are pointing out that the country can do better, and should strive to actually do what it says it does. The people who villainize those kneeling persons would rather ignore that the country has a problem.
@@Khronogi And this reason exactly leads some people (Trump) saying "the world is laughing at us".
As a resident of the world, yes we are. And you are one of the best reasons for it.
let these people affected alone, they were already p much doxxed by the media, we dont need jalex ones adding to it after all this time
Honestly. Regardless of the law. This was the most despicable thing a person could do to. Accusing people, who have gone through trauma, of faking it for a politcal conspiracy is outrageous.
The Federal Government lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and millions were killed over it. Did you complain about it?
No it isnt
Never heard of stolen valor eh?
That's not what happened. If it was it is not even close.
Now, pull your head out of your ass tough guy/gal, and do something worthwhile. Go after Hillary Clinton, Obama, and Biden.
Anything else. ANYTHING ELSE! You are a joke.
I love how we live in a world where something is bad, someone reflects honestly on it, and people's response is "you really have no idea do you?" This place is so distorted and backwards, it's a wonder 8 billion people still live here.
Sounds like someone’s is going to need a huge sale on Brain Force on their website
Brain Force Plus. It’s what Doctor Dude from the University of Falling Off a Surfboard recommends. The immigrants carry brain worms and you have to buy his Brain Force X Plus and tactical taint wipes if you want to survive.
He's going to need Brain Force to go the way of space force
He's already been begging people to just send him money to cover these costs. He has no shame.
Sounds like someone should have either used more Brain Force, or less if he was already using it.
@@rahulmenon4357 New name for psyops
So, basically, Jones behaved like such a massive bellend he managed to negate his 1st amendment rights and kill his own defence.
I'm actually impressed.
Honestly, that’s how I see it. It’s utterly astonishing to see.
It genuinely is impressive. This shit never happens.
He thought he was above the law like the rest of the cult.
Calling him a bellend is an understatement.
Alex: I hold myself in contempt!
It’s heart wrenching these parents are not permitted to simply grieve in peace. Having to constantly move homes & look over your shoulder for violent lunatics is unfathomable.
Jones created that environment. Jones deserves to be in jail.. more restitution than a mere $fine. (One parent even committed suicide because the grief, and assault on his privacy, was too much to bear.)
Or he killed himself because he was mentally ill - but nah lets blame AJ as it's easier.
@@davidmaitland3238Don’t act stupid, you know exactly how he did it, by actively lying and telling people it’s a hoax and going after the families.
@@davidmaitland3238it wasn't his opinion though it was just a lie to help further his career which was found during the discovery process when his lawyer accidentally sent a whole copy of his phone to opposing council. You are also fundamentally misunderstanding the first amendment it shall protect your speech from censorship if it is a matter of opinion but what Alex was commenting wasn't an opinion but claiming them as fact which makes you liable to a defamation lawsuit. As with your understanding of the law defamation lawsuits would be near impossible.
Tldr: These aren't opinion they are events in history there are only facts it's not a matter of opinion.
wow i didnt know 27 lives were lost at sandy hook now with loss of a father who took his life because he was stalked and harrassed! thank you for this information.
“Gruesomely offensive stuff…” And the tragic thing is that this is an understatement. Jones is just heinous and repulsive beyond words.
Wow, sheesh. I can't imagine living all the way in Connecticut and having to fly down to Texas to find a licensed attorney in Texas to file a lawsuit. These poor parents and families were already suffering emotionally. The financial impact is just insult to injury.
While I agree, it shouldn't have been a challenge to find a willing attorney for the case, seeing as the odds of winning the case is quite high, (the attorney's office) big bucks that could be easily reaped from the defendant, the fact that thanks to Jones himself, all the physical evidence needed to go after him is really easy to find/get and the good PR boost. All of these factors makes the case seem like a really hard offer to refuse for any good attorney.
Couldn't they just call an attorney on the phone?
Well, Jones will probably have to pay for all of it and way more
@@WT..... Wym? The entire video above explains exactly why and how it's amazing that Alex Jones ever saw any justice to begin with. It was far from an easy case. If Jones had actually defended himself he probably would have gotten away with it.
Or thet could have, ya know, just not done that and moved on with their lives.
He wanted to lie about the families, fine, but encouraging people to send those families death threats? How is that allowable? Why aren't threats taken more seriously? If Someone threatens to kill another person, that ought to have consequences.
free speech in America, speech has to cause harm with in seconds basically.
Dude on January 6th, we literally had a failed cou de ta attempt, just face it *THE LAW NEVER APPLIES TO, ATL-RIGHT Conservatives*
They're welcomed to do and say WHATEVER they so please, *NO MATTER WHO IT OFFENDS, ATTACKS, OR DISRESPECTS*
@@vashsunglasses people like you believe words are a form of terrorism🤦♂️
Fine? Really? So would it be fine for people to make up stories about you when something tragic happens?
@@grandspringdale1564 Words can be a form of terrorism if they incite terrorism. It's not rocket science kiddo.
Odd. Here in Australia if you ignore a court orders (yes Australian judges also dislike this and you should also not piss them off) they just throw you in jail for contempt of court. You can stay there until you do decide to follow the direction of the court. I would have thought the Texas court would have done the same. Throw him in jail and he stay there until he decide to follow the court directions. At this point it goes beyond the civil suit. It about sending a message the court authority must be respected.
In America you can buy your innocence if you got the money .... The rich do it all the time ....
They do the same in the US too, but it's up to the judges' discretion on how they want to handle it. The court here stated that this default judgement was done INSTEAD of escalating punishments, which would have ended as you said.
As for the "sending a message" part - eh, people disrespect the courts all the time, each judge handles it differently, some have no tolerance, some just want BS cases out of their courtroom.
Although had Alex Jones been sued for defamation in Australia, he most likely would have been able to easily avoid any such consequences and get away with most of his reputation basically unaffected. Australia is well known for having some of the most unreasonably terrible defamation laws(recently amended; late last year but still pretty shockingly bad) in the western world.
So thankfully that wasn't the case......
@CarlMatt : these are civil cases involving AJ, which are a different category from criminal cases/law. If it were up to me, I would marry the two law sets.
This sounds like a worthwhile tradition tbh.
So you lose your kid, and then you have to move 7 times, because you are harassed and threatened for being an ‘actor’. Jones should be jailed, not just pay a fine…
Jailed for LIFE.
I am willing to bet that he has decided one of two things.
1) He can make more money off of publicity from defying the court than the fines.
2) The discovery information would contain more damaging information than the cost of any fines. Maybe even criminal.
Either way, I see a crowdfunding appeal in the future...
The crowdfunding appeals have been an ongoing sideshow for some time already. Jones is passing the point of diminishing returns, as even his most loyal supporters succumb to wingnut welfare fatigue.
At some point there needs to be a disgorgement based on fraud for his attempt to make money off this.
Fraud cannot be allowed to be this profitable, or we’re all kinda screwed.
Makes me wonder if it's possible to enact a penality like: $100M + 200% of gross earnings, retirement, donations, and gifts above $15080/yr (full-time minimum wage) for the next 20 years. Though, he'd probably off himself in under 3 months of being poor 🤷.
Aside from the "He actually bought his own grift" possibility, I think he made the choice he did for practicality. He doesn't want to admit he doesn't have the documents he insisted he had, becuase if he did, he would lose credibility from his fans - and his only income is from extremely dedicated fans who truly believe in him. I think he felt like he was going to lose regardless, but this way, he can slow down the penalty in appeals and keep getting more money from his fan base. Without those core followers, he is out of ANY source of income from a long time and isn't going to be getting new ones. I think he made the practical choice, to be honest.
The guy near the top has copied this comment almost word for word.
Imagine going to law school for years, paying tens of thousands of dollars and busting your ass on unpaid internships only to end up with a professional obligation to defend a lying conman who refuses to do the things that will let you do your job and fulfill that obligation.
I am surprised we dont hear more stories about lawyers snapping and strangling their clients with their own ties.
Should be easy to sleep at night knowing a lying conman is giving you all his money and also screwed himself in front of a judge.
@@thewhitefalcon8539 Providing that the lawyer is still getting paid at this rate.
Some clients definitely need a bit of smacking lol
I just don't understand how can you ignore courts for YEARS and not be arrested? I can only imagine some common, non-rich and famous person getting absolutely destroyed by the justice system if they tried to pull this shit
He filed appeals and asked for exceptions and it took years to go through them all. He didn't ignore the courts, he exhausted all his legal options THEN ignored the courts.
People that aren't rich don't get sued for millions of dollars.
It probably has to do with the fact that this is a civil lawsuit, not a criminal trial. You can't be arrested for ignoring a civil lawsuit because that's not a crime, but it does mean that you'll automatically lose and be forced to pay damages, probably a fair bit more than you might have paid had you defended yourself and still lost. Which is essentially what happened/is happening here, especially given that the judges are clearly fed up with this guy's antics and unlikely to show him any leniency in assessing damages.
What WOULD probably be a crime is if Jones then refused to pay those damages, but that's more likely to result in something like wage garnishments than prison time.
@@CidGregor you're in contempt of court, people get arrested for that, there is a video by Legal eagle about Steven Donziger, he's been arrested for 2 years for contempt. Edit: and I am for Donziger's release, but Legal eagle argued for legitimacy of his arrest for contempt
@@PilsnerGrip No. You're not. Contempt of court is different. Donziger was hiding assets related to a damages ruling. Jones was hiding info pre judgement, which is fine. It's just tantamount to a concession.
And there are still many many people who think Alex Jones is "cool" and "tells it like it is."
I used to have to deal with Alex "Jarhead Jones" Jones when he was a bottom feeding producer at Austin Community Television (ACTV). He was the same then as he is now. When he goes on his incoherent tirades, it's not an act. That's his normal way of existing in the world. When he seems calm and reasonable? THAT'S when he's acting.
How someone has managed to become so rich with the blood money he's made and that he's become an existential threat to every democracy in the world using only his diminished capacity, his DSM VI afflictions and his insatiable cravings for attention is a bellwether indicator of just how badly critical thinking in education has failed this nation.
What is DSM 6?
@@lordzaboem After a nanosecond of Google search I found this...
_"Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5"_
Contextually this makes sense given the OP questions Jones sanity. Quite rightly IMHO.
Seeing as OP is referring to past events, it stands to reason he's referring to an earlier edition. Thus he probably mistyped IV as VI.
It would be fascinating if you made a video presentation on Jones.
@@lordzaboemDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders by the American Psychiatric Association.
It's not like he's made all his money off of that. And why don't you talk about the politicians that lie about dead kids? Like when Bush lied is into war and killed thousands of kids? The babies in incubator thing was all a fake PR stunt to drag us into war so actually Alex does have the right to question it because our government has done way worse than that before.
His choice was show his cards and lose the bluff or refuse to show his cards and lose anyway. One way he keeps the bluff, and the deniability, the persecution narrative, and his fans.
but not his money lol, though he probably has plenty of that
@@cluelessmango768 He needs to be sued until he loses all of it.
Do you think Alex Jone's present business will not collapse under the weight of the pending judgements. The most he can expect to drag out appeals process is four or five years, with multiple teams of lawyers these cases must be costing him a fortune.
@@katiehettinger7857 don’t underestimate how much capital he’s making, he’s selling 1 dollar supplements for 30 bucks or some shit, he could start a gofundme at any time and get a shid ton of money, he advertises a shid ton too. That guy is making stacks, and even if he starts going broke, his followers will be reinforced in their belief that the government is out to get them or some shid
@@katiehettinger7857
So long as he holds fast to his delusions, his audience will support him no matter what. Because it's never about what is true, it's about what you want people to believe is true. Modern incarnations of Jay Jonah Jameson from Spider-Man are inspired by Alex Jones and we all know how full of shit the former is.
I’ve listened to much of the depositions in this case and coverage of Jones’s reactions via the podcast Knowledge Fight (they also have some recent episodes interviewing one of the plaintiff’s lawyers and it’s legitimately hilarious.) I think we shouldn’t dismiss arrogant idiocy and incompetence here. Jones has dealt with MANY defamation suits before and all settled out of court or eventually gave up trying to make him cooperate. Statements made in depositions and in criminal trials he absolutely couldn’t avoid in the past did serious damage to his reputation, and the reality is that Jones is 100% guilty. He was lying in bad faith and relying mostly on 2 sources who were also lying in bad faith, including one highly unwell man who had a personal vendetta against a sandy hook parent. He DOES have a total disregard for the authority of the legal system, AND he believes that complying with discovery will harm him more than losing the money, AND he is an idiot with incompetent staff who does not keep records of anything and therefore cannot produce them, AND has repeatedly fired lawyers for saying things he doesn’t like. All of the above are absolutely true and evident from what he’s said on his show and in the depositions that did happen. He’s a malicious, narcissistic, stupid scammer, and that’s what honest discovery would reveal, so he stonewalled and hoped they’d give up. I hope they bankrupt him.
"I hope they bankrupt him." I couldn't agree more. Jones losing his wealth and platform would be a small ray of sunshine in these last few dark years.
@@coryzilligen790 Right!
@@singjazzy6697 Oh shit, then why didn't he provide this in discovery? Seems pretty damning if you ask me. He should have had a plethora of information to put up then. Do tell how him losing everything once he has to pay the damages and go bankrupt is worth him not providing this "evidence" and winning the court cases?
@@20Tresten Hi Tresten,I don't know why he did not have that but it was maybe the property rights of AIRCRASH INVESTAGATION. But I can tell you that since I watched many of his programs and saw the foolery of the government or whoever. I was shocked. I mean, think about this..if this was to be shown in court, many people would be in a world of hurt. I guess better to send 1 guy down the river than a huge amount of conspirator's who pulled this off. At that time he was showing proof that it was faked or staged with actual video of the crimes. I do'nt care for his personality, but he sure opened my eyes and millions of others. You can call him what you want but he was real good at what he did. BTW. all of the people in sandy hook had their homes paid, but I cannot verify that.
Knowledge Fight is the best.
When the lawyer asked "so how many men would you say you've killed" I lost it.
That so many of Jones' followers continue to believe the conspiracy and even defend his actions is evidence of his liability, as well as the lasting harm that needs to be addressed in the penalty.
Its hilarious that they claim to be "pursuing the truth," while screaming bloody murder that lying apparently has consequences.
Addressed with outright JAIL TIME
I remember when Sandy Hook happened so vividly because I working as a server at a restaurant in Rhode Island by the highway, so I met many relatives that were flying into Rhode Island to go to the funerals of the children. It was very emotional 😢.
Imagine not only having your young child gunned down, but having to also constantly be on the run to avoid being killed by people who don't believe it even happened. And all because of a couple psychotic men, one with a gun and one with a radio show. I just hope he doesn't wiggle out of this with some bankruptcy BS.
If there's any justice in this world, he'll end up living under a highway overpass. Of course, there isn't, and he'll probably weasel his way out with minimal losses.
I’m kinda starting to wonder if there should be a hefty fine for defamation. The news tells everyday people something false, and when the courts say it isn’t true, most of those people would rather not believe that what the news said to them was false.
Alex own a tank BTW not just guns a full scale armoured vehicle
no one is trying to kill them lmao. ur actually delusional
@@beluga2342 Alex Jones endorsed the January 6th riots, in which several people died. That was his crowd. That same crowd sent death threats to the families of the Sandy Hook shooting. They were absolutely in danger.
Frankly, it's ridiculous that Alex Jones has been allowed to thumb his nose at the law for this long. Cases like this only remind us that the law moves swiftly against the poor, and slowly against the rich.
Maybe Donald Trump pays his bills.
You couldn't be more wrong, Mr Wong. Justice is delayed and denied mostly to the poor who often have no choice but to rot in jail for months or years while awaiting trial with nothing but an unsubstantiated accusation by an officer. Their bails are set at several times their annual salary if not outright denied.
@@s1mph0ny Uhhh, that is exactly the same thing I was saying. You apparently don't know how to read. Congratulations for stupidly telling me I'm wrong for saying the exact same thing you're saying.
@@s1mph0ny They said swiftly *against* the poor. You're agreeing with them, despite your first sentence clearly showing you don't realize it.
Justice was constructed to protect the rich. The existence of paying to be bailed is sufficient to prove it.
So he lost because he refused to comply with discovery, and now recently we saw what he was hiding thanks to his lawyer's screwup.
"Lesson is, don't piss off the judge.". I hope they take him for everything. Please release a follow-up the day the financial penalty is annouced
how does that relate to your quote? you know a judge or somethin?
ITs a delay tactic and he doesn't admit to his followers that he's actually a twit. Oh, and its what trumpf does
@@SeaCryptWeave I like the quote
@@SeaCryptWeave Didn't Legal Eagle say this in the video?
The video literally started off with LE explained how Alex angered the court/Judge by constantly refusing to turn over information/evidence
People are a lot more clear minded than I am. Especially if I lost a child. This guy is seriously lucky that he has only been sued.
Right.
I'm not sure he realizes he's been lucky, but I had the exact same thought. If you said even a fraction of the vile things he said to folks IN PERSON, that situation likely ends in the ER.
If this asshat forced me to move SEVEN TIMES to avoid harassment after my small child was slaughtered...I couldn't promise I wouldn't break the law.
Yeah if this was me I couldn’t guarantee I’d have the composure to refrain from trying to choke the life out of him with my bare hands.
Yeah I'd say most people are probably more clear minded than you are. Everyone stay away from this 120 lb badass with the gauged ear rings!
If he doxed the man's address when he knew his viewers are violent how is he not in jail?
We do not have enough legal protections and redress for harassment and assault that starts online! That should definitely be illegal!
If we were as violent as you all make us out to be, you all wouldn't be here.
@@MrRamziaB Hate to break it to you, but that statement is nowhere near as reassuring as I assume you meant it to be
+MrRamziaB They literally had to move 7 times to avoid harrassment
@@MrRamziaB Infowars and their followers were at both Charlottesville marching next to open fascists in 2017 and attacking the capitol on Jan 6.
I find it hilarious when you've got someone claiming "i never said that!" When there's literal video evidence of them saying it.
I've seen a republican being interviewed with the same claim and was shown a well known clip of them saying exactly that. They turned around and claimed fake news........ dude there's well known video evidence of it!
Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?
Edit: don't act like democrats lie as well. Jeez...
What they're doing is literally gaslighting... ugh.
You see, when it doesn't say what I want it to say it's just out of context. What is the context? Well, I dunno but I am certain that the statement is out of it.
It reminds of Alex Jones boyfriend Milo Yiannopoulos openly stating he approves of raping children.
In regards to your notion on that Republican; all politicians do this, every single one of them is a two-faced liar, practically part of their job.
I love how he says "if you get sued, call your lawyer immediately", as if the everyday person has a lawyer on retainer.
Its kinda like how Doctor Mike always says "call an ambulance"
Dude, with what money
@@Benchp300 the Dr. Mike one makes more sense though as most people at least have health insurance ;)
Most people who have things to be sued over will have some sort of lawyer, even if not one that is likely to be able to defend them from being sued. It's very rare for people without much money to get sued, because there isn't much to fight over. Retirement savings are often exempt from any judgement, as are a single personal home, so most people just don't have much to be sued over.
@@Benchp300 respectfully intended, your statement makes me sad for your country. Ambulances are 100% free here, as is hospital stay and treatment.
@@stevenglowacki8576 exactly, nobody sues homeless people.
He's claimed they were trying to deny him due process, while he's actively refusing to engage with the process?
Yes. Exactly.
They gave him like five chances to provide the stuff they asked him for. The funniest thing is that they chose an employee named Rob Dew to be the corporate representative for InfoWars. A corporate representative is required to provide certain information. Rob Dew was unaware of this in the first deposition he did. He was also unaware of this in the second deposition he did despite being informed of it.
It's an advanced political strategy called "lying to safe face".
and his fanbase will eat that up like its the truth sadly. despite the evidence staring them in the face
People who do that usually aren't competent to engage in the process and should be admitted for psychiatric evaluation.
Love to see Alex Jones get slapped, but isn't it far more frustrating and sad that this was the "unicorn" of Texas law as that Lawyer put it? If you listen to the things he said and the effects of what he said on these poor families it's annoying that most of the time somebody like him get away with it.
And before somebody uses the freedom of speech excuse, there have always been limitations to that freedom, scholastic terrorism should not be considered free speech.
Scholastic terrorism sounds like a formal term for... what happened st Sandy Hook. Stochastic terrorism is what you're looking for: inciting randomized violence against a group without a direct and personalized call to action.
If Alex's wife is reading this: I'm not saying I'll pay you to beat him up, but if you already have any home movies of a beating that has already transpired...
Freedom of speech is a very broad rule. It certainly has its costs. I don't think you can get around it by stuffing all of the costs into a word like stochastic terrorism and calling it a day. It certainly makes things interesting lol
It's not a unicorn because he lost. It's because he and his lawyers were so purposefully incompetent that the judge basically said "screw it".
Freedom of speech EXCUSE 🤣
Alex Jones is a hilarious example to study. If you are arguing or debating with someone and they pull any of his famous lines on proof;
"I have the Documents"
"Look it up"
"Do your own research"
"Why should i look it up for you?"
It is EXTREMELY likely they have no reputable, or qualified sources.
I had a coworker recently claim she had 1500 documents to prove her view was right. Sure you do!!!!! I have been tempted to ask her if she watches Infowars. She has many similar views.
A idiot that should be avoided ... he spreads panic and fear... nothing more. Glad social media has cut him off. Let him sit in disgrace. Humanity is better without him.
Oh god, I've had one of those arguments, with an anti-vaxxer. He told me with a manic gleam in his eye about how much of his own research he'd done, and how I'd be absolutely convinced if he had time to walk me through it all. I just did the carehome-staff thing of nodding politely and going "mmhm".
My favorite is when they eventually do share their source... And it's schizo typical ramblings from some guy on Twitter who has a swastika in his pfp
Glad Alex got punished for his lies. Rest in peace to all the children and teachers who died a horrible death.
Why do I get this shitty feeling that this guy could become POTUS one day ?
But he didn't get punished for the lies. He was punished for not cooperating with the court... or did i watch another video than you?
@@chrisakaschulbus4903 Eh, six of one, half-a-dozen of the other.
Remember, this video _also_ points out Alex Jones _lost_ his motion to dismiss charges for being a SLAPP. That means the appellate court found his speech was NOT protected, allowing the defamation cases to proceed. It's not at all unbelievable to think Jones would have lost on the merits at trial had he cooperated.
I'd B more concerned about the surviving parents & other family members of the slain getting both rest & peace
...given that Jones apparently made it his personal mission 2 ensure that, by cowardly using his audience members as proxies, the ones left 2 pick up the pieces of their shattered lives & families would get *neither* rest nor peace.
Right wing nut jobs never cease 2 prove that, no matter how vile & disgusting U already think their thinking & behavior is, they can show U just how much more they R capable of.
@@zenkim6709 You can rub and dip it, if ya know what i'm sayin'
I will never forget the first time I (unfortunately) became aware of Ms.Taylor-Green. She was running down a street screaming at a teenager like a crazy person. She was screaming that he was a liar and telling him to admit that the school shooting was fake. I am not positive that this was the case she was referring to (if it wasn't please someone let me know).I have never had any reason to doubt that she is bat-shit-crazy since then.
This event was not regarding the Sandy Hook shooting.
Taylor-Greene publicly accosted Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting survivor David Hogg with accusations of faking the shooting. A video of the encounter came out on January 28, 2021.
She was chasing down a survivor of the Parkland high school shooting, which at the time of her harassment had only happened one year prior, so not Sandy Hook but still reprehensible
@@zaplepikachu I gotta wonder what was going through her head at that moment. Any person in sound mind would know that a grown woman chasing a teenager down the street and telling him he wasn’t in a life-changing tragedy isn’t a good look. So I wonder what she thought she was doing.
@@paulmahoney7619 I honestly think she believed she was doing a good patriotic act. She has put herself in a mindset where she is the sole defender of America, and anyone who does something she disagrees with is a vile human being, and since she comes from a fundamentalist christian upbringing, she doesn't believe in good or bad in the same way we do. She believes what determines whether an action is good or bad is whether or not they are "saved by god" or doing it "in accordance with god," so any action she takes is a righteous one. It's absolutely terrifying that not only do people with this mindset exist, it is really common in the U.S.
She sounds like a Grade-A Karen if she's an Alex Jones supporter.
The sad thing is, I don't think it matters how much Alex Jones will have to pay, the damages will never be enough to make up for the psychological terror he has inflicted upon those families. Even more, I'm afraid that just like with a certain recent 'self-defence' case, he won't even have to pay his own legal fees because he can just start a fundraising campaign to get them paid for him.
I may seem overly cynical, but honestly, I don't know what else to be these days. The US has gone collectively insane.
Years of harassment, forced to move multiple times, being told that their baby didn't actually die in a horrific shooting, and not being able to peacefully mourn the death of their young child. No amount of money can make up for that. Money won't bring back their baby. Money won't stop the harassment. Alex Jones deserves more punishment than just losing some money.
It's completely insane now, you're right. I don't really feel anything other than pessimism towards our future anymore.
yup, the US is crazy. so many little kids dying violently but they care more for their precious guns.
@@Fowey7 the 2nd amendment is a fundamental part on how this country was created.
@@meadRL i dont think the founding fathers would mind i something changes in order to protect people. besides, its not even about changing the amendment, something should be done about it, anything! instead of just sitting idly by as crazy people call deny deaths of innocent children and harass traumatized parents and other victims. as someone whos not from the US its really strange to see people adamantly defend personal freedoms at the prize of dead kids
“The media hurt my fee-fees so it’s okay for me to abuse grieving families”-Alex Jones probably
Yo dude, feelings
@@blistifiedthey’re making fun of him, that he would say stupid stuff like that.
Protip: Don't mess with parents grieving over their dead children. Their revenge is something that's rarely matched.
Facts!
Absolutely true!
Hope that Alex gets what's coming for him. He's a disgrace.
Honest to goodness, he’s lucky to have his own life right now.
@@poweroffriendship2.0 he's a terrorist instigator too, and that's probably the evidence that would be revealed as part of the documents he's refusing to submit.
The unfortunate truth is the guy made a lot of money through his show. The lawsuits will be a drop in the bucket for him compared to the money he made through baseless claims.
There is also a clear pattern with this type of claim, Jones has made the same accusations against the families of the flight passengers who died in the 9/11 attacks. He made a lot of money back then pushing all kinds of nonsense. His comeuppance has been due for quite some time.
Jones has been historically right about much more than he has been wrong about. I'm not saying that Sandy Hook did not happen, but it does not take much investigation to see that everything is not on the up and up.
I can only hope his platform finally burns down completely. Other people will lose their jobs too, of course, but at this point I'm not sure that I care. He's a terrible human being and he _needs_ to be punished.
@@scjohnk everything Alex Jones has ever been right about is already open knowledge and easily researchable. It's just nobody cares because it's usually unimportant. If someone like Alex Jones actually had real truth about anything he'd probably be dead
@@scjohnk So what did Jones have to hid if he was right?
@@bookfound I didn’t say he was right about sandy hook. I’m just saying there is more to it than we were told. I don’t know what that is though, but lots of things don’t add up.
The best part is how people think jones is always right. They forget he says 1,000 conspiracy theories a day, at least one is bound to be true when you’re guessing at over 50,000 a year. Doesn’t make you smart or right, just means you got lucky
The term is "Confirmation bias"
Even a broken clock is right twice a day
All conspiracies aren't theories.
In Spain we have the idiom "un reloj parado da la hora correcta dos veces al día" (even a broken clock gives the hour correctly twice a day) for these people.
Wait, you're saying he's right sometimes?
I'm just living for his facial expression when the opposing lawyer revealed that he had Jones' phone and Jones' lawyer did nothing, Delicious.
Honestly, and don’t take this as condonation or suggestion because it’s not, but I’m truly amazed none of the parents snapped and assaulted or killed Alex Jones.
I can’t think of many things that are more guaranteed to push someone into temporary insanity than to be harassed, doxxed, threatened, and made fun of immediately after losing your child.
People wouldn’t assault or kill him
A - Because that’s a crazy illegal thing to do
and B - Because that wouldn’t solve anything
@@chill-lady-brook whether it’s illegal or not isn’t really what I’m getting at. People have straight up murdered child sexual abusers after they learn their child was abused. The observation I’m making has less to do with legality and more to do with human nature’s propensity for violence when goaded beyond reasonable limits.
And whether it would solve anything, it certainly wouldn’t, but you and I make that observation as removed non-passionate third parties. Having been close to murders myself (as in, people I know having been either murdered or attempted murdered, not as in me killing other people), I can say for certain that in the throes of anger or hate, it evidently feels for at least some people like “making this one person disappear will solve my problems”
So becuase of that, I am legitimately surprised none of the parents were goaded to violence by the absolutely inhuman treatment Jones subjected them to. People have killed for significantly less.
Edit: it’s worth remembering that laws don’t prevent people from committing acts. They just spell out the consequences for doing them. You might refrain from committing an act because of those consequences but that’s because *in that moment* the cost benefit analysis doesn’t pan out for you. But in other circumstances people self evidently do the cost benefit analysis and determine it’s worth it to commit the act.
@@chill-lady-brook Illegal, yes. Crazy, yes. Understandable, also yes.
@@chill-lady-brook educational violence does in fact accomplish things, it would make him reconsider similar actions in the future.
Violence has been the most effective method of eliciting change In behaviour in our species history
Hypothetically, if I were one of the parents, I would have killed him long ago. But not before torturing him for days and days, recording of course so it could be shared with whomever wanted to watch.
As the mother of a dead child who is still grieving, I was very interested in this video. Thank you
Condolences
So sorry for you loss 💔💔💔💔
So sorry for your loss I to last a child at 3 1/2 never get over it just try to live with it 😪😔
@Brandy Pompeo go away
So sorry for your loss and the continuing pain these people like Jones put you through
"Alleged role in alleged hoax" sums up the depth of Alex Jones' theories pretty well. I am glad his lies caught up with him.
I genuinely hope Alex Jones faces nothing but misfortune for the rest of his life. Constant, inescapable, borderline comedic (to everyone else but him) misfortune.
Don’t forget that he has many supporters. May they suffer just as much as the parents of those children.
Given his recent current legal issues, it appears someone has heard your wish lol
Alex Jones let it default because it would probably be cheaper and he wouldn't have to publicly say he was wrong.
he claims to be correct 99% of the time
Too bad no court would judge to seize everything he owns (and I mean everything - really leaving him with nothing) and a life long ban from any kind of media. It would be the right thing though.
But if he appeals he’s gonna go through the whole thing again. He’ll be asked to provide stuff all over again.
@@rav3style He won't, he'll take the loss and then use that to play victim to sell more merchandise.
That’s probably exactly why he decided to do this. I’m surprised he convinced his attorneys to go along with it. It doesn’t reflect well on them that they refused to answer any of the interrogatories or provide respond to any of the requests for production.
Hi Legal Eagle. I grew up in Newtown and was in school when the shooting occurred. Needless to say, this is some modicum of justice, for my neighbors and community, but if it isn't still just a bitter experience through and through. Thank you for covering this in your very affable way, with integrity the whole way through. Cheers sir.
So … he can give the family’s home address, knowing it would put them in danger … and there’s no law against that?!?!?
@mandellorian Yes, I think sometimes they hold 'freedom of speech' to such high esteem it takes precedence over common sense.
Really, home addresses are private information in my mind, and should be illegal to share without consent. That's not a matter of free speach, it's a matter of privacy. Like, you're not allowed to show a child's face in a video without written consent from their parents but you can casually tell everyone where they live?
BTW, if anyone is interested in, at least the Austin side of these lawsuits, then both of the plaintiff's attorneys (Mark Bankston and Bill Ogden) have been on the podcast Knowledge Fight, where they have shared some insights in the case, not to mention what went through their heads during the depositions from the case that was made public.
Be warned, the episodes (usually named "Formulaic Objections") are anywhere between 2 and 4 hours long xD
Lawsuits don't go far enough with Jones. His words inspire others to do harm. Sometimes the justice system can't provide the justice society needs
@Leslie thats me any attacks against Republican traitors is self defense at this point
@Leslie thats me how are these related to Alex Jones?
@Leslie thats me so you think it was ok when daddy trump said it?
@Leslie thats me that's not what she said though. She said to protest them whenever you see them in public.
People like you are the reason American conservatives are considered misinformation spreading idiots to us in the rest of the world. You cant argue substance so you lie and misrepresent what was actually said
@Leslie thats me it was covered in the news for months. Google it. There's going to dozens of videos. But since you obviously don't know how Google works I guess I'll go do the "hard" part for you.
The fact that anyone has to live in hiding from the audience of his show should be grounds for legal liability in itself. He has not only failed to manage the mindset of his audience, he has actively encouraged them to become more delusional and dangerous to the public.
Someone will, I'm sure, come along to say it's not illegal to encourage people to be delusional and dangerous as long as you don't direct them to take _specific actions._ I assert that it should be.
Which is why European hate speech laws were established the last time fascism had to be supressed by force of arms.
I hope we don't need to do it again but it sure looks inevitable and to be even harder this time as they are more organized AND decentralized.
@@SonsOfLorgar: At the very least, doxxing needs to be considered incitement to commit assault. The only reason to publish someone's home address to a group of people who dislike them is to terrorize that person with the possibility that someone will physically threaten their family.
@@deusexaethera assault or homicide, and classed as an act of terrorism by default.
@@SonsOfLorgar: Terrorism is by definition a crime against the State. You can't commit an act of terrorism against an individual. As for incitement to commit homicide, that would be harder to prove than incitement to commit assault. If people should've learned anything from the Kyle Rittenhouse prosecution, it's to not get overly ambitious with the charges. (unless you're trying to lose, which I honestly believe the prosecutor was doing in that case.)
@@deusexaethera No, the only thing I learned from Rittenhouse is that once you start shooting, you keep shooting until anyone who can argue with you is dead.
I apologize for clicking off early on this one. I like to watch your content all the way through because it is very interesting and watching until the end helps with your TH-cam statistics, but what Jones and his followers have done is so disgusting I can't even bear to see justice served to them. Good on you for covering it though.
I feel similarly, but my understanding is that if I mute the sound and open a new tab, I can let LegalEagle's video play through to the end and he will get the statistical benefits without subjecting myself to Jones's vileness. The algorithm can only detect whether the video plays till the end or not.
@ZomPaul I'm not sure I understand your point, but after watching your "what 'don't talk politics' means" video I'm not sure you understand it either.
@ZomPaul you don't matter to anyone, and nobody will miss you when you finally go through with it
@ZomPaul your mom never truly cared for you, and only sees you as a way to further her life, instead of seeing you as a whole human.
You aren't a whole human, you are a rotten unthinking husk
@ZomPaul Boo! 👎
Please do a follow up on this! I'm sure you are planning on it, given today's news, but man this story is juicy and I can't look away!
I wish my lawyer 20+ years ago had been this clear and easy to understand.
Speaking of a cell provider you can't mention, just found out that they're starting to collect user info to sell to advertisers, you can opt out but nothing made me want to switch faster than learning that.
I’m so glad he’s going to lose these lawsuits. What he did to those parents who were already grieving the worst possible loss anyone could imagine was beyond description. If we had a rational legal system he would be spending time behind bars for causing intentional emotional distress to families already suffering a terrible loss with his cruel and sadistic lies.
^ Very Bad Take. There's no reason to completely overhaul freedom of speech in america because a few families had their feelings hurt by a lying man. Do you not comprehend the absolute can of worms that would open?? Suddenly people could not speak openly about their opinion on matters where others' feelings are involved. What a terrible idea, putting people behind bars for using words that dont even incite crime... If that were the case, I could say your comment pushes that our legal system is not rational and that as a rational user of that legal system, your words hurt me. Do you deserve to be behind bars? I guess so. Turn yourself in, Eric Dayne.
As always, US-style free speech is double edged sword. In most of Europe - yeah, he'd be sued to hell and back a long ago and honestly, I'm not sure which system is more just
@@BD-lq4id having to move 7 times because of threats isn't exactly "hurt feelings"
@@BD-lq4id it seems that his words did incite potential crimes though. This wasn't just hurt feelings. His words incited actions.
@@BD-lq4id. "There's no reason to completely overhaul freedom of speech in america because a few families had their feelings hurt by a lying man."
Jones went beyond hurting "a few families" feelings. He pushed false narratives against them for years which incited his deranged fans to harass, threaten, and stalk these people. The families who didn't put up with Jones' crap and challenged him publicly were his prime targets. All the while he was raking in profits every time he talked about SH on his show. Jones had a profit motive and he didn't care what happened to the families.
Well this aged like a fine wine.
I'm just glad that miserable, dumpy little troll of a man finally got some kind of consequence for the absolute toxic waste he spews from his maw every day.
It's not going to undo the damage he's done to those families by a long shot, but it's something.
Yeah. I heard that he actually apologized in the podcast (which he shouldn't be here considering that he's banned from any platform including TH-cam) but even if he apologized that doesn't mean he can undo the damage he caused from 2012. He's too late for that.
Thanks for writing that. He's vile for saying what he said.
Sticks and stones... being offended by even the most ridiculous stuff isn't an argument. It just shows weakness.
And "i can't deal with mean words" shouldn't be an argument. Especially not a legal one.
@@chrisakaschulbus4903 Look up the term defamation before using shitty takes. There is a reason the people can sue in civil court on it. Sometimes "mean words" can have serious impacts that affect people's livelihood, life, and wellbeing. A prime example are the death threats the families received. Pretty extreme for some "mean words." When you cause serious backlash that hurts someone outside of their feelings, then you should be held accountable.
@@20Tresten I love the way you twist the tuna... but i need to know if your're using the canned type or something else...
Never forget Alex Jones told parents of children whose jaws were blown off, that they were actors
And did so without even believing any of it. Just saying crazy s___ to stir up and scam crazy people out of their money.
I hope he loses everything.
No, he did not. He talked about the possibility of it.
They were actors
@@moneymitch6790 Please ask your doctor to up your meds, that way you might stop defaming muder victims
Seems as though he took advantage of conspiracy theorists and 2nd amendment enthusiasts to make money off them and instead of admitting he knew he was lying for profit, rode it out so as to have those people believe he’s getting screwed by the courts. Then those people would continue to support him bc he fought for what he believed in and deserves support in the wake of his loss
I think some conspiracy theories could hold weight but Alex Jones is way out there, the guy is a nutjob
Whoa whoa whoa not all of us 2nd amendment supporters are Alex Jones fans, he is a big red clown and a stain on the conservatives. we could get more ppl on our side or at the very least listen to us if he shut his mouth. What he’s done is despicable, I feel for the families, even if I don’t agree with them politically.
Bingo
if he suddenly change his tones, he would probably get sued by his, by then, former supporters for fraud.
@@xlbeanboi2653 Sadly, the group you support includes people like that, Alex jones wont be the last
Appeals court will laugh at him as he was nothing but contemptuous of the court system. The record was very clear that he was crapping on the entire process. I see many millions getting sucked out of his bank account. Loving it!
Because he exploited a tragedy for his own selfish desires and was rightly called out for it?
He also publicly terrorized people who lost their very young children in one of the worst possible ways
He has apologized quite awhile ago
@@Ant-ym3mw that totally makes it ok than? Yeah, right.
@@Ant-ym3mw “I know you’ve had to move 7 times to avoid my rabid fanbase I keep sicking on you, but I’m WEAAAAWWY SOWWY 🥺 can I not face legal repercussions now?”
@@Ant-ym3mw He continued pushing his conspiracy theories after that apology. An apology only works if it's actually meaningful.
My problem with all this is that he's going to spend another ten years appealing first the judgement, then whatever award is granted. These families will likely die before they see a penny from Jones.
Unless he pisses off more of the judges to the point that they just drop everything and immediately make him cough of up money he doesn't have.
Good
Bunch of crisis actors don't deserve a penny !
@@bryanbrett6037 Well, I guess we found a fan of Info Wars…
Given his record of pissing off the court, he might not find anyone willing to hear his appeals.
These sandy hook parents must be incredibly nice people. If I was in their shoes I would react quite poorly.
@Talsong Kingslayer Not even sure I'd put that much thought into it. I'd probably just fly into a rage and use whatever was at hand - hands included - to do the business.
@@SergeantSniper It's super easy in America. Just buy a gun at your local shop, find him, and blow him away. Time and again, we see that people can murder several others before anyone can stop them, so if you had your sights set on just one person, you could really make sure they're dead before anyone else draws a gun on you.
@Bender Bending Rodriguez ...Do you think knives are magical objects that can cut through anything? Have you never cooked before? The majority of offenses involving a knife in England involve light injuries or no injuries, because it's much easier to deescalate a situation that involves a knife, and much easier for a doctor to treat it. You're not going to find anyone in hospitals who would rather treat gunshot wounds than knife wounds.
@Bender Bending Rodriguez with enough force they do. its been scientifically proven. Not that it matters its just yea.
@Bender Bending Rodriguez never said that, you claimed guns don't fire themselves. With enough force a gun can discharge.
Thank you! It's like having a lawyer friend explaining to me why and how certain lawsuits work.
Imagine having to suffer through the pain of losing your child, only to have an idiot and his followers claim you're "faking it". What a horrible excuse for a human being
Imagine living in a world where they are actually "faking it" but literally everyone around you refuses to accept the obvious truth that they're being lied to and manipulated. You won't.
@@disabledchatzen5276 The man admitted he was lying in court. He took down the original two videos and tried to claim he never said any such thing until presented with those videos in court. At which point he switched over to "So what if I was lying. Freedom of speech." This is all documented. You can't begin to pretend it's not true. All you can do is deflect and distract and hope some idiot mistakes it all for a valid refutation of easily verified facts
@@disabledchatzen5276 It sounds like you are claiming the Sandy Hook shooting never happened. Is that what you are claiming?
@@disabledchatzen5276 imagine still being dumb enough to believe Jones ranting when's he's admitted its all shit?
@@disabledchatzen5276 I want you to think about the logistics of such a batshit theory. Not just what Alex Jones said or didn’t say. Think about it mathematically. There were in the ballpark of 300-380 kids at sandy hook, with 30 something teachers. To stage something like this that would mean EVERY single student kid is a crisis actor or paid off, it wouldn’t work if even one of them wasn’t in on it. So that’s hundreds of elementary school aged kids (who aren’t exactly known to be good secret keepers) and 30 teachers who are paid or I guess, threatened to keep their mouths shut for years. Not even mafia families can keep their secrets with less people in the organization and the threat of death for those who snitch. So what makes you think 300 kids and 30 teachers are able to keep a massive secret for a decade?
What's so difficult about the difference between free speech and deformation/harassment?
Sharing an opinion is one thing, continually spreading misinformation, inciting violence by sharing addresses, and so on, is far from sharing you speech, it's blatant intentional targeting to damage.
Is it not?
The Bill of Rights is sadly not taught in complete thoroughness in US public education. They only quiz us on the general details, and rarely are people taught how to interpret legalese. So not many people are privy to the limitations of their legal protections (unless they themselves study it), and quite frankly the US government and corporations benefit from this ignorance.
The Nazis fought misinformation pretty fiercely too. He never shared any addresses. He never called for violence against anyone. Lies, my man. Lies. It's all a big stinking pile of bs.
@@philiom7724 Straight to Godwin, hey?
Was Jones lying when he described the families as crisis actors? Is is just a coincidence that the family has received threats such that they had to move several times. Even if Jones didn't directly call for violence, expressing that narrative to the kind of radicalised audience that he has developed was inevitably going to lead to threats, if not violence. You seem pretty-well mired in BS yourself.
I'll have to poke a hole there "Spreading misinformation" can literally just be interpreted as "Sharing a wrong opinion"
Free speech does include the right to be wrong about things.
The rest is far from free speech, but this first bit is a slippery slope that goes all the way down to hell.
Freedom of speech is more important than anyones life.
I'm all for free speech, but he caused these people who just lost their kids and loved ones to be harassed to the point they had to move. He put out their private information. That is malicious. Even if a person thought it was a hoax, a decent person wouldn't do this just in case they were wrong.
I believe that everyone should have the right to do whatever they want, as long as they are not hurting any other people through their words or actions. The instant you start harming others, your rights end.
@@scottlemiere2024 I could not agree more, you are allowed to do whatever you may, so long as others are not hurt in the process.
Freedom of speech isn’t supposed to mean freedom from consequences.
@@scottlemiere2024 yep. As the saying goes: your right to swing your fist ends were my nose begins
@@scottlemiere2024 according to wikipedia, Categories of speech that are given lesser or no protection by the First Amendment (and therefore may be restricted) include obscenity, fraud, child pornography, speech integral to illegal conduct, speech that incites imminent lawless action, speech that violates intellectual property law, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising. Defamation that causes harm to reputation is a tort and also an exception to free speech. So, it protects a lot but there's some it doesn't protect when it cause harm or breaks the law.
Alex Jones put his own foot forward, tripped over it, and blamed the courts for his fall.
Those poor families. Haven't they been through enough.
I simply can’t imagine going through the most traumatic moment in your life and have crazy people accuse you of faking it.
Been there. It sucks. I feel even more for these families, though. Losing a child is a life-shattering tragedy. I don't know why or how people come up with these batshit crazy conspiracy theories that people are lying about their children dying in a school shooting. Alex Jones should be facing criminal charges, especially for doxxing a family so much they had to move *seven times* because of *death threats.* That's putting them in real physical harm, as if the emotional damage isn't bad enough. I hope there's more lawsuits and I hope he loses ALL of them.
False Flag.
@@WarriorTilTheEnd I hear his wife was arrested for domestic abuse.
@@dpersonal4187 You make me sick.
@@hyliastone286 you've already been infected with the sickness of believing the MSM. false flag.
Maybe Jones wanted this to happen. Hear me out. If he knew he would lose this case either way, he might have calculated it was better to lose this case in an obscure and confusing way that he could later tell his fans was unfair. That would at least protect his reputation with his fan base, even if he was forced to pay out some money.
This isn't an absurd theory at all. It's absolutely what he was doing.
@@nathanrailsback9667 yep. Doing everything he could to avoid saying "I lied to rile people up " out loud
Yup. Instead of having to go on the stand and admit that he made everything up, now he can claim "They denied me due process because they were terrified when I went on the stand that I would blow the lid off their conspiracy!"
@@aniyn
Indeed ...
In fact I equally see him rant to his audience that they "cut out my tongue, as they were afraid of what I had to say" ...
... despite the Court issuing the default judgement is in Texas, not exactly a Democrat State, and possibly has the most liberal gun laws out there ...
... in fact, the judge issuing the default judgment likely votes Republican consistently, meaning him (Alex 'Apocalyptica' Jones ...) complaining about the judge being a "Liberal and Progressive" for "what he did to me", is simply not true ...
But, above all else, what I can hum doing next is expanding his conspiracy to the US Judicial system. Thus it isn't just the Executive, and the Legislature, but now the Judiciary, all part of the secret cabal to curtail American Citizens of their Constitutional Rights and Freedoms (but saying nothing about the concurrent Responsibilities that come with both ...) ...
In fact, I'm pretty sure he will intensify his belief that the Federal Executive, Legislature, and now Judiciary, all created 'False Flag' School, and Mass, Shooting Events, to limit 2A rights, as part of a very long-term conspiracy to finally take over the entire Government, and the United States ...
A compulsive liar can't accept truth when it doesn't align with his ideals.
It's no surprise he'll try to twist it to get out of legal trouble.
Alex Jones "I am above the law"
Every judge ever "No you're not"
I'm getting sick and tired of these sovereign citizens morons. In the end all they do is waste time and annoy anyone who actually respects the law
he posted a persons address, knowing people wanted to harasse them, why isnt he in jail? like this person, jones, is vomit. harassing people is a crime, isnt it ?
I'm willing to fly from CT to Texas specifically to mock him at his home. At some point you get real tired of idiots thinking they can do what ever they want. Commenting about the issues only goes so far, Real change in this country has to happen soon or were all doomed.
@N Fels i literally couldn't attempt to say it better than that
He refused to comply to discovery so he could lose, not have anything damning come out and claim he had been wronged by the courts to his fans
Except he'll be broke.
He should have complied with the discovery process. All he had to say was freedom of speech.
Just let the safe and righteous government search your shit bro, do you have something to hide?
🤡🤡🤡
And looking at some of the replies to comments on this very video. It worked. It's grotesque and unfortunate cause even if Alex were to completely vanish, there's plenty of other slimy exploitive folks out there ready to take his followers down the next insane rabbit hole.
Alex Jones shouldn't pay a huge amount of money to the parents, he should pay ALL of his money and finally close his stupid circus
Not enough. He needs to work for the rest of his life to pay them what he owes.
@@EricGoebelbecker : And by "work" it means he needs to sell more of his bone broth and tactical anal wipes.
Still not enough. He needs to do it while counselling parents who've lost their children to anything
In a chain gang 18 hours a day for punitive reasons.
...and both his testicles.
If there wasn't for the tragic loss of life and the pain of the mourners, I would find this very funny. Hope Jones loses everything.
The guy is despicable, I’m so glad he lost.
Ok CCP shill
@@cheese5728 you know...I never see any of you posting your comments directly. I always find you lurking under the comments of other people like roaches. Scattering when exposed to the light of information and knowledge. Your opinions never change from blind ignorance instead of adapting to new information. Jones had every opportunity to provide the evidence he claimed and refused to do so. Now he suffers the consequences
@@starspangledkiwi7224 and of course he doesnt write these comments under his real account LOL cowards
@@cheese5728 CCP has nothing to do with this.
It always warms my heart to see Alex Jones lose a lawsuit. He's the kind of person that just deserves it.
It would be more relieving to see him in a prison uniform and off the airwaves, internet and anywhere else.
@@3baxcb Or living under a freeway overpass, reaping all the years of bad karma he's sown.
@@coryzilligen790 All that would be missing is three Billy goals which would be outwiting the troll that he decided to become.
@@3baxcb Yeah. It's even better to see other right-wing reactionary community losing their minds over Alex Jones being locked behind bars. Why? Because they are the ones who gave Alex the platform on TH-cam via podcast.
I heard that he actually apologized about the Sandy Hooks shooting in the podcast but I doubt people will ever forgive him. So his apologies is way too late.
Dilate
Two amazing interviews with one of the families’ attorneys, Mark Bankston, on the Knowledge Fight podcast. I’d highly recommend everyone listen to them- the guy does an excellent job of threading the needle between humor and pathos/anger.
I just found out about Knowledge fight. It heard the hosts on Behind the Bastards. I will have to look for those episodes.