Running out the Non-striker | Mankading | Know Cricket Better Series
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2018
- Understand Running out the Non-striker or famously known as 'Mankading' Cricket Law in detail. Subscribe for more such Videos.
Mankading explained in Hindi - • क्या है मंखडींग | Mank...
Background Music: www.bensound.com/royalty-free-... and
Fast+Feel+Banana+Peel+-+320bit by Alexander Nakarada
(www.serpentsoundstudios.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
#mankading #ashwinmankading - กีฬา
Ye video ka hindi version dekhne ke liye ye link click kare.
th-cam.com/video/muTW0zpAExM/w-d-xo.html
Changing the thumbnail 😂
Mankading is legal & IMHO a brilliant move. An excellent video, superb clarity of explanation.
If mancading is unsportsmanlike then then batsman leaving the crease is also illegal. Batmans leaves crease to get the advantage of avoid running out.
Love the way you changed the picture of ur thumbnail😂😂
The last case was mind blowing 🤩🤩
I have a question which is not related to this video.
When A right arm bowler starts his bowling and suddenly changes the ball to his left arm and bowls it. This case umpire might turn it into no ball.
But when a right arm batsman suddenly changes into left arm batsman and this is called a switch hit and this is valid.
WTF is this??
Simple logic behind this is, batting needs much more concentration than bowling. There are a lot of things to be considered while batting unlike bowling. This was much debated when Kevin Pietersen started playing the switch hit regularly.
You can read the below article to get more clarity.
www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10628790
@@TheCricketDigest The term"switch hitting" is one directly from baseball (much like many other terms are) . MLB hitters of elite calibre can hit equally strongly from both sides of home plate. Batting statistics are compiled based on which side the batter hits from. There are scenarios where the field manager will use a (legitimate) pinch hitter also. What is called a pinch hitter in cricket defies the original use of the term given it involves the outright replacement of one of the originally advised batting order.
But there is a significant difference and as a cricketing person I believe it should be brought into cricket to eliminate what I see as a form of cheating by a batsman when he changes as the ball is bowled. Baseball has a batting box on either side of home plate and the batter must take his stance in the box before the pither starts his delivery. Prolem solved for cricket batsman and no advantage is gained.
nice video. ...informatics video....alot of guys do not know about this law, it good for who do not know about cricket laws...
I know evry rules i dnt break any rule in my life when i play evry game like cricket
i think umpiring descision was wrong because when BUTTLER steped out the delivery must have been completed........ashwin waited for buttler to step out......so sad
Well the video clearly mentions that when the ball is being expected to release... And it is when the bowler takes his stride... Ashwin didn't take his stride
Best channel regarding cricket
No doubt butler was out and that within the law..
But if we notice when ashwin stopped Butler's bat was in the crease...
Butler was expecting a normal time delivery.. if ashwin would had bowled that delivery than i don't think there was any problem ( means bat would have been in the crease).
Butler's only fault was that he wasn't watching the bowler..
Here is my question to u sir,
Isn't it unfair to non striker batsman, that he have to watch first bowler and than batsman striking the ball..
Where he gets split second less tilo react to a run or a shot coming towards him...
What's ur view on this and how should a batsman tackle with it ????
Read the definition. 'To the instant when the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball'. When ashwin in between his run up,butler was in the crease. Butler anticipated he would release the ball in a fraction and he moved forward like anyone would. But ashwin stopped and let him cross the crease. That's against cricket law right correct me if I am wrong
@@darthvader3535
Thats a flaw or can say loophole in that law...
And ashwin took advantage of it
Tempers are frayed, allegations are made, motives are assigned, voices are shouted down and everyone is in a tizzy. You would think someone had been assaulted, swindled or waylaid. And, in a manner of speaking, you wouldn't be wrong because we are talking about the spirit of our game, that wonderfully fuzzy, subjective thing that everyone defines differently.
So, should Ashwin have run Buttler out? Should Buttler have been more vigilant? Was Ashwin devious and Buttler robbed? Was Ashwin clever and Buttler defeated? Did Ashwin violate the spirit of the game? Ah, the spirit of the game! It is something so dear to cricket lovers that there is actually a preamble to the laws of cricket that specifically addresses this. It talks about respect, towards teammates and opponents and the umpires; it talks about playing hard and fair and accepting the umpire's decision, about creating a positive atmosphere through each player's conduct. And more on those lines.
But can the spirit of the game be at variance with the laws of the game? Since both are drafted by the same entity, you would assume that playing within the laws of the game would assume you are playing in the spirit of the game. So when Ashwin ran Buttler out, was he within the laws of the game? And within its spirit?
If the two are in conflict, as it seems here in the eyes of many, the laws must take precedence. In recent times, running a player out for backing up too far at the bowler's end has been studied by the law makers. And not a moment too soon. Far too many batsmen were abusing the convention that you don't run a player out by drifting, often intentionally, out of the crease thereby running less than needed to complete a run. Where run-outs, and team fortunes, are decided by millimetres conceding six inches or a foot to the non-striker made no sense.
And so the revised Law 41.16 says that the non-striker must stay within the crease till such time as the bowler is expected to deliver the ball. This is where a lot of the debate has centred. Ashwin says he hadn't loaded up in his action, others say he had crossed the point when he would be expected to release the ball and that, at that point, Buttler was still within the crease. Maybe anticipating that, the law-makers also said that 'If you do not want to risk being run-out, stay within your ground until the bowler has released the ball".
I think that's the right thing to decide what is right...
If the batsman is out and then it is known that he was no ball then why would not it be that the batsman should be given out and giving the batsman the warning and it does not happen when the ball is bowled and the mankads have the right of the bowler. You can not put pressure on him that he will give you Warning. It depends on his desire. We have become so accustomed to seeing the batting of batsmen that no one has thought of it from the bowler. Minister wants is coming I do not know if the rule is true out to be wrong ... Are you agree 👍👍👍
Awesome! Thanks!
I think that's the right thing to decide what is right ...
If the batsman is out and then it is known that he was no ball then why would not it be that the batsman should be given out and giving the batsman the warning and it does not happen when the ball is bowled and the mankads have the right of the bowler. You can not put pressure on him that he will give you Warning. It depends on his desire. We have become so accustomed to seeing the batting of batsmen that no one has thought of it from the bowler. Minister wants is coming I do not know if the rule is true out to be wrong ... Are you agree 👍👍👍
I would like some clarification about the law 41.16, i.e. Mankad. What if the bowler fails to run out the no-striker runner? We have two situations:
A) No-striker manages to be back in touch with his ground and then the bowler drops the wicket, in this case I think this is a no-ball under law 21.6, right?
B) No-striker manages to be back in touch with his ground and then the bowler doesn't drop the wicket, but he stops however because he saw the no-striker came back, what is this?
Ashwin's act was perfect and in fact every cricketer should emulate Ashwin. He faithfully and judiciously executed the provision of the rules of Cricket. Butler's illegal stepping out of the crease to score runs is an absolute violation of the game of cricket. To prevent such action the rule was enacted It has a merit. Ashwin to be complemented and Butler to be condemned. No sense in talking gentlemen vs ungentle men. Hats off Ashwin!!!
I think R.Ashwin watched your video
Very informative. Well done guys. Keep it up.
Great!
today ashwin run out buttler like this in ipl. came to this video after that run-out
Ya ... I came
I think it was case 5 today as ashwin had completed his stride and he waited for buttler to get out of crease. If he had released the ball like a normal case, buttler wouldn't be out of the crease by then.
it is case 2. He came to his stride but didn't complete his action.
When ball is in left hand of the bowler and action was completed by bowler with right hand and hit the non-striker batsmen what is the decision. His out or dot ball.
Also pervious ball already given warning by umpire to the same non-striker bastmen.
Mankading is Fair Play !!!
Good man
Great Idea Of Changing The Thumbnail Quickly 😜
Thank you very much. We too want to survive you see :D
What was in the thumbnail before?
God Bless...!!!
Nicely explained bro. What do you think about buttler getting out in such a disappointing way today in RR vs KXIP?
According to the laws he is out isn't it? This is the 2nd time Buttler getting out in this fashion. Hope he corrects this mistake
Rule is rule but he takes time... And many other countries cricket lover hate this case as ashwin takes time.. Its against sprit ...and i want ashwin in WC and in front of international players if he do so... We will eadily win this world cup
@EASY - TECH bro but he taken time... See his moves in slow motion... U will observe he was inside the crease when adhwin stop his delivery and he took atleast 2 sec but if ashwin continue his ball at that time... Buttler leave crease in right time
Excellent bro
Boweling dalte samay bowl fekne se pehle Agar non sricker bestman ka per line ke uper to kya bowler use out kar sakta hai... Bestman ka bat line k bahar hai but uska ek per line k uper to kya use out diya ja sakta hai????
Thanks for the video
I believe dont leave the crease before the ball is released so batters shouldnt complain if they get mankaded
Question: If the bowler accidentally/unintentionally breaks the stumps with 1) his hand and 2) his legs or any other part of the body while the non striker is out of his crease and goes on to deliver the ball, what will be the umpire's decision?
1) If the bowler breaks the wicket by the hand in which he is holding the ball then the batsman will be given out on appeal. Whether it is accidental or not doesn't matter. All it matters is if there is an appeal made or not. If there is an appeal made by the bowling team then the batsman will be given out. If there is no appeal has been made then there is no harm and the batsman can continue playing.
2) If the bowler breaks the wicket by any other part of his body and goes on to deliver the ball, then it will be called a no-ball. If breaks the wicket and doesn't deliver the ball then it will be called a dead ball.
What are the rules of Timed Out....why Tendulkar was not given out when he was suppose to reach field in time against South Africa test match?
We will cover this in a separate video.
Can you throw the ball on wickets??or u have touch the wicket with ball?
I think it's fair, even without a warning. The batsman is leaving his crease early to get an advantage, why shouldn't the bowler stop him?
Thanks
Does batsman will be considered out if bowlers throws ball rather than simply touching it to the whales?
Is there any penalty if the bowler mankad invalidly
bhaiya app logo k video ne aaj bhout madad ki 1000rs ka match tha
Maze karo :) and hamara channel subscribe karo.
I've seen this happen in a match I played in the batsman was backing up a lot. The bowler stopped and gave him a warning then the batsman did exactly the same thing on the very next ball
How many of them watch this after ash- butler incident in IPL
I watched after thumbnail.
Tempers are frayed, allegations are made, motives are assigned, voices are shouted down and everyone is in a tizzy. You would think someone had been assaulted, swindled or waylaid. And, in a manner of speaking, you wouldn't be wrong because we are talking about the spirit of our game, that wonderfully fuzzy, subjective thing that everyone defines differently.
So, should Ashwin have run Buttler out? Should Buttler have been more vigilant? Was Ashwin devious and Buttler robbed? Was Ashwin clever and Buttler defeated? Did Ashwin violate the spirit of the game? Ah, the spirit of the game! It is something so dear to cricket lovers that there is actually a preamble to the laws of cricket that specifically addresses this. It talks about respect, towards teammates and opponents and the umpires; it talks about playing hard and fair and accepting the umpire's decision, about creating a positive atmosphere through each player's conduct. And more on those lines.
But can the spirit of the game be at variance with the laws of the game? Since both are drafted by the same entity, you would assume that playing within the laws of the game would assume you are playing in the spirit of the game. So when Ashwin ran Buttler out, was he within the laws of the game? And within its spirit?
If the two are in conflict, as it seems here in the eyes of many, the laws must take precedence. In recent times, running a player out for backing up too far at the bowler's end has been studied by the law makers. And not a moment too soon. Far too many batsmen were abusing the convention that you don't run a player out by drifting, often intentionally, out of the crease thereby running less than needed to complete a run. Where run-outs, and team fortunes, are decided by millimetres conceding six inches or a foot to the non-striker made no sense.
And so the revised Law 41.16 says that the non-striker must stay within the crease till such time as the bowler is expected to deliver the ball. This is where a lot of the debate has centred. Ashwin says he hadn't loaded up in his action, others say he had crossed the point when he would be expected to release the ball and that, at that point, Buttler was still within the crease. Maybe anticipating that, the law-makers also said that 'If you do not want to risk being run-out, stay within your ground until the bowler has released the ball".
Nice
I was having a question.. what if we have to run out a batsman but the stumps have already being hitted and the bells are on the ground??
We will make a seperate video on this.
Can u explain this with Ashwin Buttler incident
Your video is uploaded five month earlier..and you put tonight's incident ie, ashwin-buttler mankading as you cover
Yeah. Though you are making a good content you have to use some tricks to attract the people isn't it?
@@TheCricketDigest Haha very true. Great Content BTW. Helpful for many..
@@TheCricketDigest Am too in your subscribers list now. Will look forward for more interesting content.
Is this can happen 2 warning in a inning ???
There is no warning.
I agree with the rule. If the bowler oversteps by a millimeter it is a no ball. So if the batsmen oversteps they should also be penalized. It is basically a no ball for the batsmen
I have done this from birth lol. It is too annoying when the batsman is half way down and the ball is not bowled
once cricket was played by dravid,satchin,gilchrist etc and now here like Ashwin
what is this called in cricket
Rule is rule but he takes time... And many other countries cricket lover hate this case as ashwin takes time.. Its against sprit ...and i want ashwin in WC and in front of international players if he do so... We will eadily win this world cup
Bro if a half swing is done and does not go into the full swing ang goes to hit the stump then the non striker is out or not
It will be out.
@@TheCricketDigest I am asking about half hand swing while bowling if yes plz reply 😃😃😃
@@tushardewani as far as you don't complete the swing, you are allowed to run out the non-striker. Half, quarter everything is allowed.
What happens if the attempted mankad is not out? Is it a no ball or a dead ball?
It will be a dead ball.
this channel soon reach million subs...
Thanks for your wishes @siva rajamani
If the ball made by bowler is uncounted, then how the scored made entry of the wicket ?
Just like how it is recorded in case of batsman getting out on a No-ball.
I say its perfectly legal. To me, its no different than when a runner is caught trying to steal a base in Baseball.
If a Bowler steps even a micrometer over the popping crease, he is penalized with a No-Ball. So why shouldn't the batsman be penalized for leaving the crease early, and trying to get an unfair advantage? I honestly think the only people that complain about this law are people that have been caught by it in the past.
agar bowler running crease ke bahar chla jata h to bina hath ghumaye or fir runnot kare kya out h?
Yes. Hath ghumne se pehle kiya to out hoga.
Make it in hindi also...and make video on no ball according to the over stepping the crease and side line
Our new channel for Hindi is coming soon. Be ready to subscribe ;)
Hello nice video btw. Buttler was lawfully out however its against the spirit.
I am a bowler myself, if we go over the crease by 1cm we get penalised for a free hit and no ball, so when the batsmen goes over the crease why shouldn't he get penalised and be run out?
Yes according to laws it's right to do this but even if we think without getting emotional and beyond spirit of game, It's logically not correct as if all bowlers started trying this. 70 percent of the wickets in match would fall because of this.
There is any warning for runner before out this fashion
As explained in the video, there is no warning.
Who out in real Cricket this type
I want to see the video???
Plz make a video who out this Type???
Are you Bengali?
Before bowler releasing the ball hw can he out its totally wrng decision
Do watch the full video and see what the cricket law tells about this issue.
when the bowlers dont get the wicket by bowling they are given more spirit less ways of getting wickets
U r gr8 u tuber
Is Mankad a dot ball?
No. Ball won't be counted.
Why indian players don't play in big bash so that they can read the pitch conditions , as foreign players play like ipl and what is the number of players can play in a team excluding Australian
BCCI not allowed now-retired players to play foreign T20 league
But, some case BCCI allowed to play charity matches
BCCI make this rule because they force senior cricketers to play domestic cricket. It help our youngsters.
Rest of cricket board can't invest huge money like BCCI that's why in some case they give NOC to play some foreign T20 League.
PCB allowed any of 2 T20 League
ECB allowed when no cricket left before 15 days of international cricket
Max 8 foreigners can includes in every franchise. Doesn't matter they Aussies or not. West Indies and Australia have many T20 players that's why most overseas players are from these WICA & CA
Ashin waited for butler to cross the crease... even commentators said the same....
Opinion:
Mankading is not against Spirite of the Game.
"Mankading" agar out karne ka RULE hai... Toh "Spirite of the Game" / "Khel Bhavna" ke khilaaf hai aisa nahi kehna chaahiye.
Phir bhi agar Mankading Spirite of the Game ke khilaaf lagta hai ...
Toh ball faikne se pahle Non-striking Batsman run ke liye daudta hai yeh bhi to Spirite of the Game ke khilaaf hai....
UNINTENTIONALLY UNDISCUSSED HYPOCRISY.
Fark sirf itna hai ki ek Batsman friendly hai... So we don't even Discuss.
Aur dusra Bowler/Fielder friendly hai...
So we start crying over Spirite of the Game.
Mankading ball is counted or uncounted??
Not counted.
Fun fact Ravi Chandra ashwin is watching this video
In baseball, and of course this is not baseball, running out the non striker is similar to the "balk" and there are penalties, if I am understanding cricket correctly. The issue is when play starts, and at the start of play, both teams should have equal chance.
Which law is is stated in case 4? Say the law number
Appendix A2.6
I did this in my game today and it was given not out but I did it legally
Is mankading allowed in cricket?
Yes, it is allowed.
স্টাম্পের আগে কি বল করা যায়? এইটা নিয়ে একটা ভিড়িও চাই প্লিজ
What if we mankad all the batsmens
You can do that if they leave the crease early.
The Funniest Thing About Mankading Is " THE LAW OF CRICKET IS AGAINST THE SPIRIT OF CRICKET".
Then what a player is supposed to follow!! The law or the Spirit!?
Spirit of the game has never told that following the law is wrong. So this action is well within the spirit of the game.
If there’s anything to be blamed then definitely not the player , it is the rule ..... this ain’t any infringement of rules , I’d stand by the bowler ..!!
That's the thing! But we often saw even the analysts also mention it that mankading is against the sporting spirit... It tend to set a negative example for young generation. But from my personal viewpoint, I don't find it that nonsporty... As a batsman leaving the crease prior to release of a delivery is himself violating the law.
@@ranjithjayakumar I too
The Roy .... on the other hand young generation will also learn to not step out of the crease and be cautious 🙂
What is spirit of cricket
It is a very big topic. I suggest you go through the law book to understand it better.
Agr rule hai toh hai, then it's not shameful to out non striker
why warning, didn't the non striker know these cricket laws...
Do this act is in the spirit of the game??
Yes it is. By leaving the crease early, the non-striker is gaining an unfair advantage. If he wants to gain the momentum then he can start from little behind so that he is not out of the crease before the ball is released.
@@TheCricketDigest thanks sir! While Ian Bell incident pls explain where the play would've been unfair
If it's really against the spirit of the sport then why is it a legal move in the sport?
Makes no sense to term ot as "against the spirit of the sport".
But ashwin case they given out for butler
Read the 41.17 Law and then describe.
Hope you have read 41.16.
Deepika Sharma out is valid by the way
Good information
अगर बॉलर overstep कर जाता हैं तो नो बॉल दी जाती है और फ्री हीट दिया जाता हैं बैट्समैन को,
तो बैट्समैन crease से बाहर निकलेगा तो उसे आउट क्यों नही दिया जाएगा।
मेरे समझ से इसमे कोई डिबेट नहीं होनी चाहिए।
Opinion:
Mankading is not against Spirite of the Game.
"Mankading" agar out karne ka RULE hai... Toh "Spirite of the Game" / "Khel Bhavna" ke khilaaf hai aisa nahi kehna chaahiye.
Phir bhi agar Mankading Spirite of the Game ke khilaaf lagta hai ...
Toh ball faikne se pahle Non-striking Batsman run ke liye daudta hai yeh bhi to Spirite of the Game ke khilaaf hai....
UNINTENTIONALLY UNDISCUSSED HYPOCRISY.
Fark sirf itna hai ki ek Batsman friendly hai... So we don't even Discuss.
Aur dusra Bowler/Fielder friendly hai...
So we start crying over Spirite of the Game.
Mankading is when you can't win a match and cry like a baby.
Haar cb match ke baad kon aaya hai
It is rule so it is legal
I think mankadding should remain legal... Think of it logically: if the non striker has the right to leave his crease before the ball is released, then the bowler must have the right to run him out. - my opinion
It is legal. Cricket laws allows a bowler to do it.
@@TheCricketDigest aap ke video achche hain
Jo v rule ho ...aise hmlog out ni lete h
So ashwin didnt cheat
its in the laws of cricket
Not in the spirit of game
Bht spirit of game has difeerent perspecitives
But still
Nthing wrong by ashwin
If baller over steps the line even for an inch its a noball
Then why we shouldnt consdier the samefor batsmab
aswin ne beimani ki..jb tk wo creaze me hi tha jb tk ball ho jani chahiye thi
😭😭😭😭
Kya hua? 😑
Walking before the ball is bowled is obviously a form of cheating - trying to gain an unfair advantage - be strict and batsmen will stop doing it.
Its just a match win or loose will not make a big difference here but what aswin did will remain in history for long time .he should not do that atleast he can gave buttler a warning before trying mankading.
Such a shameful act by the bowler no spirit what's so ever I hope his team will kicked out from ipl badly this year and then they kicked out him from the team such a shame
Bhai hindi
Hindi version
th-cam.com/video/muTW0zpAExM/w-d-xo.html
Why should I trust you? Are you an umpire?
Yes, we are a team of professional cricket umpires.
@@TheCricketDigest Okay, respect from my side! And sorry, new to the channel!!
No problem. Hope you liked our content. Do subscribe and keep watching the videos.