Roshen Silva's Deliberate Short Run Incident | Analysis Series
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2018
- Sri Lankan team was slapped with 5 penalty runs for Roshen Silva's short running on the 2nd day of 2nd test match between Sri Lanka and England. Complete analysis of the incident.
Background music : Sorrow by Sappheiros / sappheirosmusic Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/b... Music promoted by Audio Library • Sorrow - Sappheiros (N...
#RoshanSilva #shortrun #cricket - กีฬา
![[Watch Party] RoV APL 2024 Bacon VS Earena](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I5XAoIs-r6o/mqdefault.jpg)
Learn from the legend mahela jayawardane. Once he comes out of the crease, He always used to complete the run even if it is a boundary and the fielders were already given up the chase.
And raina too
raina too
suraish raina also
Is there any difference between signalling 5 penalty runs and giving yourself a shoulder massage at 0:53....?
Lmao
Lol
😂
lol
😂😂😂
That didn’t seem deliberate and seemed unintentional to me
Yeah why would you do it deliberately?
Watch till the end... Its wasnt deliberate in thr sense of being malicious but he batsman didn't make an earnest attempt to complete the run.
@@kaushikprithviraj850 yeah he just walked the second run to keep the strike
@@kaushikprithviraj850 yes I see and I agree - the only "gain" here would be to lose runs! No need to be rude about it.
The only thing that makes me feel umpires are correct is - the batsman know very well that he didn't reached the non striker end and he never made any attempt to ground the bat but still took off deliberately for the second run. Looks fair to me. May be no malicious intent unlike Pollard but clearly he was aware of what he was doing.
Imagine if this rule is applied in gully cricket, many matches will not finish ending in supeerrrrrr fights😂😂😂😂😂😂
I was wandering why England’s total was increased from 285 to 290. Thanks for the video explaining the reason.
@@sidmallya7421 😑🖕
To prevent cases like that of Pollard, the rule should be such that if you run short, you'll only be given one run and the ends will be changed as if only one run was scored
technichally you stop inbetween and you cancel the run so its like it doesn't count
You did put a lot of effort into this :) appreciate it, good work!
Thank you for clearing that up. In 50 years of watching, I've never seen it so clear. Roshen should have at least attempted to ground his bat before running back. As such, I can't see how Erasmus could give anything else. You are always taught as a kid, to complete the run. This is why. Strange, because the rule states "deliberate" which implies malice which was not the case. The deliberation was to not attempt to finish the run, to deliberately return to the strikers end without trying to ground the bat.
The Law requiring the application of penalty runs in the case of a deliberate short run is new.
By the way, deliberateness does not imply malice. Deliberateness is equivalent to 'voluntariness'. It just means the action was not done accidentally, or, in the case of an omission (like this) was done knowingly.
As we have stated in the video, this case doesn't exactly falls in the category of deliberate short run as it looks like Roshen Silva ran back to the crease to avoid run out but not to get the strike back unlike Pollard's case but he had to pay for his mistake of being lazy. Once you are out of the crease you either complete the run or stop when the ball becomes dead. He knew that he had not completed the run but still he ran to the other end and he made no genuine effort to complete the first run. Umpire felt that he ran to the other end in order to get back the strike and he had enough evidence to believe that. Hope this clears your doubt.
@@TheCricketDigest the difference is that Pollard decided (read: deliberated) to run short. This was evidenced by the benefit he gained by doing so, namely, regaining the strike in a limited overs match while batting with a less capable partner.
In the Sri Lankan case, none of that evidence is available and, in fact, contrary evidence - the batsman's obvious confusion - was available to be used.
I think the umpires have convinced themselves that they must apply Law 41 simply because of how far short the batsman was from completing the run. This may be relevant evidence, but they have given it far too much weight, in my opinion.
Roshen Silva was of course batting with the lower order less capable batsman and it was first ball of the over. He wanted to be in strike for sure.
This is of course a debatable topic and the things are not clearly conclusive. We have done our best to analyse the situation. Thank you for your interest in our channel. Keep following the channel for more such contents.
amazing video bro !! loved the analysis
It was good description. Never knew about deliberate short run concept. Thanks for the video. Cheers
'Deliberately ' means wanting to overlook. But having seen the sudden circumstances arising at the boundary, any one would want to go for a another run instead cheating.
Harsh! I wouldn't call it cheating. Massive lack of concentration cost him and his team. He "deliberately" didn't ground his bat showing 0 intentions of making the run giving the umps no other choice.
Perfectly explained..! Thank you..!
Really appreciate the effort you are taking for explaining the things.
Thanks man... Was indeed waiting for the reason...
Thank you for that useful and succinct explanation.
Finally found a good channel on cricket analysis. 🚀
Very gud channel n analysis : subscribed
Very well explained...thank you
The example made things clear. Nice. Thank you.
Good video, please continue to make videos which are useful as you are doing now.
Superb and detailed analysis bro...great
Excellect information.. 👏👏👏
Excellently explained. Well done brother.
Good analysis. Keep it up bro.
Very well explained👍....good job
Thanks for the information 👍
Quite good, fair and unbiased analysis, quoting rules and technicalities. Liked it!
Unfair?
@@TheCricketDigest Holy cow, I just realized my typo, corrected it now 👀
Thanks... Very well explained
Perfect explanation!
Great explanation, thank you
It was unintentional from my point of view
Delibrate because he not shown intention to complete first run..atleast he should have tried to drag the bat
@@prashantsurani4374 whats ur prob bhai...why u using bad words ? Cool down ok. Talk with some sense and logic. If u don't have that then keep quiet
@@prashantsurani4374
What a totally moronic comment. If you are interested in the video, then comment on it. If not, just go away.
Just see the video and comment.....
1. He thought that this would be a boundary and didn't even turn his head towards to crease.
2. When he knows that this isn't the boundary then he began to run. 3.Not sure how few guys come up with such a stupid thing that's its Intentional😂
yes, mcc should include clauses to some rules, like this incident, that incident between India and RSA when umpires called lunch while India needed only 2 runs!!
Very well explained...cool!
Very insightful and objective explanation
Very good explanation bro..
Lit 🔥 explainatiom
wow, that's a great video!
This was an error, in my view. There is a difference between a deliberate (or voluntary) action and an incidental omission.
It was not exactly deliberate short run, yes but once you start running you should either finish the run or stop when the ball becomes dead (ex : ball reaching the boundary). Once they saw that the ball didn't reach the boundary in this case they could have settled for one run but they didn't do that and Roshen Silva ran towards that striker's end. This prompted the umpire to take action.
@@TheCricketDigest yes, it as a short run, but for it to be deliberate one would habe to establish that a) he knew he was short BEFORE he took off for the next run, and b) made a decision not to make good his ground.
I don't think either could be established here.
@@davidhemsworth4098 If he bothered to atleast ground his bat it would have been considered unintentional. He was just strolling next to the crease thinking it's a 4 and when he realized it's not he instead of trying to ground his bat at non stickers end made a dash to the strikers end.
You might say it's not deliberate but it's definitely not unintentional either. Umpire has the power to decide and in my opinion it is a good decision.
@@nikhilreddy8550 An action, by definition, cannot be done with an intention if it is not also done deliberately
@@davidhemsworth4098 The thing is the player had a brainfade and made an irrational move. I understand your point that it's not deliberate. The law makers did not consider stupidity while drafting the rule.
But end of the day I think he deserved it for his stupidity and laziness. WTF was he seriously doing there.
Appreciable
Keep uploading brother
Good explanation
Good explanation thanks
great video
U r exctly correct..
i think he just forgot because checking the boundary fielder
Looks like admin is a srilankan fan.....Nice video
Nice explanation
awesome explanation
Really nice
Well explain, 👍
Gud xplanation bro
He thought it was a boundary and was returning to the striker's end. On returning he came to know that it was not a boundary and the non-striker had almost completed the 2nd run and it was too late to go back and ground the bat and come back, so he continued to run only to save his wicket not to take an extra run.
Thanks for explaining the rule and the situation so clearly. I feel however that the rule of always awarding five runs can be a bit harsh. Instead, the umpire could award the total number of runs that the batsman attempted to complete.
Agree, have just seen this in BBL Perth v Brisbane, don't understand the 5 run penalty but can see justice in no runs being awarded
It's the right decision. While I'm sure he never meant to not ground his bat and was an honest mistake, there was never any attempt to at least try and ground the bat. It had to be awarded.
Can u upload a video of an unintentional short run? I'm interested to know how they make the decision for intentional vs unintentional
Probably something like grounding his bat on the line instead of behind it
It wasn't deliberate at all. He had all the time in the world to make the 2nd run even if he got back to complete the first run. It was just him not paying attention.
Its awesome
Good information
Thanks
Fair point you have just made
Superb
That IPL Short running you showed us it’s actually quite clever from the batsmen, But against the rules
Nice info
Do you have any content about Bangladesh cricket team?
Nice
Nice video can anyone tell me about d background music name
check out the description.
Thanx
Penalty for fielding team ? So they will be added to their batting card (when they come to bat ? ) Or will be taken off the score board now from SL innings ??
Added to ENG score
Penalty runs are awarded to the fielding side. In Cricket, whenever a team is penalized for any offence then the penalty runs will be awarded to the opposite team. For example in the above case, England's 1st innings score was increased by 5 runs for the Roshen silva's offence. Watch the below video for more clarity.
th-cam.com/video/htajarRKZio/w-d-xo.html
Yes, understood ... It's SL innings going on na, so got doubt how & when penalty will be added to Eng!
👍Got it
@@infobyHethi Glad that you were able to understand it better. Keep following the channel for more such contents.
Adding to England’s 1st innings score earlier they were 285 after this happens they turned up to 290
Nice one
Who will keep the strike in case of the unintentional short run ?
how to differentiate between deliberate or otherwise is tricky
If that innings is 2nd innings i.e chasing in that will score of batting team will be reduced or in what way penalty will apply
watch the below video to understand it better.
th-cam.com/video/htajarRKZio/w-d-xo.html
Thinking that the ball wd reach the fence de didnt ground the bat but on seeing the other batsman running he ran. So it was not deliberate. Your language is good with clear pronunciation. Kudos!
But he made no attempt to complete the first run. So there was intent to not complete the first run.
where is the example video for unintention short runs
Very well explained✌ but at here it is unfair to decide it as a deliberate short run...roshen didn't run intentionally...it was clearly unintentional...
After you hit the ball as a batsman, you have 1 job lol He didnt even attempt to ground his bat... INTENTIONALLY not grounding his bat made it an intentional short run. He gave the umps no other choice. I wouldn't call it cheating though , just a lack of concentration that happened to go against the rules. Its not like he was caught with sandpaper :) and I bet he wont do it again lol
@@AUSTDOG1 100% this. It was a schoolboy error and an especially idiotic one at that.
On what basis did the umpire determined the batsman ran short 'deliberately'? Shouldn't the third umpire get involved to make an informed decision? The rule does make sense as long as there is a guideline to interpret it.
What is deliberate padding? Plz explain or make video👍💐
Do watch the below video and let me know if you have any doubt.
th-cam.com/video/p6sUGyoH1Us/w-d-xo.html
Please let me know if batsman runs a three runs and 2nd run is short run then how many runs will be scored?
2 runs.
In the case of 3 runs, if 2nd run is short run, will 3rd is considered as count. That is run count is 1 or 2?
Run count wi be 2.
I don't think it was intentional by any chance.
He didn't have anything to gain from that short run unlike Pollard's case.
Is their any scenario of short run when you run for three and you get 2 run
Cricket rules has to remove the word deliberately and add the word intentionally, because Pollard intentionally did the mistake, Silva by mistakenly did the mistake, but Pollard escaped and Silva punished, what's this dirty rules
What does the score board say? Extras- but tagged to what? It cannot be LB, NB.. can anybody tell what will this 5 run be tagged to?
It will be recorded under penalty runs section. A special category which exists for recording penalty runs.
Please upload any vedio for wicket keeper fault or significant movement
It was unintentional short run 🏃
I think his presence of mind was absent their and it wasn't an unfair decision by the Umpire.
I consider it a big mistake.
You should not be allowed to be this much reckless in a test international.
Just like all students know loopholes to cheat in an exam... These tricks are also known to cricketers !!
Break the rules, face the punishment. He intentionally didn't ground his bat, thats all the umpires needed to see to say he intentionally made a short run. Deliberate cheating? Of course not! but did he break the rules? Absolutely! I wouldn't call the guy a cheater though, just a lack of concentration cost him.
What happened in Pollard case
His deliberated short run
Is that help 5 runs to Fielding side?
God cricket is complicated for new people to understand
Bravo bro
Who is next batting
Can a fast bowler bowl both pace and spin bowling in a single match? Is there any possibility for that?
Yes, the bowler is allowed to that.
Still didn't understand why the umpires penalised this? I think it was purely unintentional.
Brother How to download the laws of cricket?
pdf version - www.lords.org/getattachment/MCC/All-Laws/2nd-Edition-of-the-2017-code-2019.pdf?lang=en-US
search for 'laws of cricket' in android App store if you would like to access in phone
well explained brother.. You can be a teacher.. of my teacher could explain like you I would have been the toper of the class
It was a last wicket.
A set batsman at non striker end & last batsman on striker..
Hits the ball n started running crossed each other. Suddenly got to know its a last ball of d over n returns to there original end .
What shuld b the decision?
Runs to b scored?
This is a deliberate short run case. No run shall be scored. 5 run penalty will be imposed. Batsmen will be sent to their original end. Which means the set batsman will get the strike next over.
Deliberate ??? Who is deliberate here umpire or the player
If one batsman does not touch the crease while taking three runs, then how many runs will be counted?
two runs
What happened in that Pollard's case? Any penalty runs for that?
No action was taken. So i guess, umpire didn't notice it at all or he didn't consider that as deliberate.
Seems fair enough to me. Sometimes, you pay a penalty in life, as well as in cricket, for being a careless prat. I'd bet good money that, even if this was an honest mistake, he won't do it again.
If the Short run maid by batsman, why the umpire giving 5 runs penalty for the fielding side ? I couldn't understand
In Cricket, whenever a team is penalized for any offence then the penalty runs will be awarded to the opposite team. For example in the above case, England's 1st innings score was increased by 5 runs for the Roshen silva's offence. Watch the below video for more clarity.
th-cam.com/video/htajarRKZio/w-d-xo.html
How many runs will be scored if the batsmen of both sides take shot runs while taking 2 runs?
One run will be counted.