It's amazing how far we came in 60 yrs. of science fiction!! This is so silly it's hard to watch. But can you imagine the little kids on a Saturday afternoon watching this in a big beautiful theater with popcorn, candy and a coke for 15 cents!! Maybe we should go back!!
Rickarama Trama - Get friends to enjoy it with you by having YT movie night: lights out, candles, popcorn, hotdogs, Raisinets and Coke. Make it a pajama party with the big boys for fun, that way, you can spike the punch and have fun with it.
Nothing better sometimes than a good, ol' Buck Rogers movie! I always get a kick out of the sound effects for the space-ships and just enjoy a pleasant change from modern films. One thing that did catch my eye was the image of Planet Earth from their outer -space, it was definitely one of the more realistic portrayals I've seen in an old movie. I often think of how exciting it must have been to be a kid back in those days and let your imagination run wild after seeing one of these movies. :^) Thanks for sharing it ..
“By the year 2000 space travel may be common place.” Yeah .. about that. 2022 here, and we bring you cat videos via Tik-Tok. Space travel to other worlds you say? .. sounds like Science Fiction to me!
Have just begun watching this and, while I thought it would just be a camp, I actually find it to be pretty good. The script moves things along, the characters act intelligently (so far), and the actors, though not all equally competent, seem committed to the story. Thanks for posting.
As a syfy fan , I lov this stuff !!! My father saw this in the movie , I saw this on TV as a kid . as a kid it fueled my imagination , this is the stuff the inspired as a kid George Lucas Steven Spielberg and others . much respect to this ..
For sure! I found it very strange they scored in 1953 .. In 1953 this production would not be a movie with these techniques and quality. (only Edward Davis Wood, Jr. with Plan 9 from Outer Space) kkkk
They just added the narration, with the newspaper headlines, etc. You notice that the newspaper mentions jets, etc., which were not flying in the 1930s.
Clips were added showing a DC6 airliner which definitely didnt exist in the 30s. I do remember watching Buck Rogers,Commander Cody,Capt. Midnight etc on tv in the 50s. Sponsored by Ovaltine and Farfal the dog!
flash Gordon first appeared in about 1934 in weekly chapters, with a cliff hanger that made people come back. hoakey as it was things like the 'televive' was just a figment of some writers imagination, until some kid in the audience turned it into reality years later. the 'disolvo ray' turned into the laser beam. no clue what space travel would be like or how they would take off or land They made it simple and for the audience kinda believable. magnetic trains........ amazing how much of this sci fi is reality 80 years later!
Crash 'in a polar region'? They wanna pick which one ...ha Love the reference to the future.....2000. Oooh a Buck Rogers flick...ah those guys on 'sat-er-run' are crazy.
Mini Jim a hidden gem a look far into the future .. the rocket ships are now a government secret..oh the horror shoud these secrets fall into hands os our enemies. No expense was spared on special effects...technology so advanced its hidden among national security archives. Whole teams of chechoslovakianmiami midgets were mercilessly slaughtered in the making of this jaw dropping example of flawless acting delivered so naturally you forget you're watching a science fiction masterpiece.
You must remember that this was made before World War 2, aimed solely for younger audiences, because science fiction stories was considered infantile. It must have been difficult times,especially for most SF writers, trying to sell their work, and taken seriously by the general public.
Warp Prime 42 *"aimed solely for younger audiences,"* That's because there wasn't, and still isn't, much science fiction at all to speak of. What is called science fiction even today is still 99.9% science FANTASY. Remember that stupid film called Sunshine that people gushed over? That was a stupid slasher film which was rooted entirely in fantasy, and not at all science. One of the first serious science fiction films was 2001 and it still remains unique since that was entirely a science fiction movie, and it's a rarity to this day. Star Trek is fantasy, Star Wars is fantasy - and those are for children.
+fuzzywzhe Perhaps you have never seen a film called "Mysterious Island" adapted from a story by Jules Vern. And then there is "20,000 Leagues Beneath the Sea" also by Vern. These were true science fiction. Both were the origin of Captain Nemo and the submarine Nautilus. If you have not seen these 1950's movies I can recommend both. As for targeting the younger audience, the movie "Forbidden Planet" with Walter Pigeon and a young Leslie Nielson, is widely considered the first serious treatment of a science fiction theme. But I agree with you technically this is a science FANTASY film. Cheers fuzzy
fuzzyidiot you are an idiot. What the fuck are you ranting on about? Science "Fiction" means made up just as Science "Fantasy" does. It's hilarious when the idiots that have a bug up their ass start correcting people thinking they know more and end up sounding like fuzzyidiot does up above!
PeterDad60 *"Science "Fiction" means made up just as Science "Fantasy" does."* No, it doesn't. Science fiction is what is conceivably possible, however the technology doesn't exist, however the current known science doesn't invalidate it as a possibility. Science fantasy is what is known to be impossible given the known science. As we learn more and more about the natural world, more and more things fall from the category of fiction to fantasy. Jules Verne wrote a lot of science fiction.
fuzzywzhe, "science fiction" and "science fantasy" ARE the same thing. Both terms refer to science as a basis to tell fantastic stories that are right now, impossible. You say "Star Trek" is a fantasy because it will be impossible. However, there are a number of devices from the series that are becoming reality as we speak. The diagnostic bed, tricorders, the transporter and warp drive are moving from the realm of impossible to possible. Various medical supply companies now sell different versions that were inspired by the original beds. There are handheld scanners that can be aimed at various materials and can determine their composition. CERN and several US tech companies are making headway and have achieved transportation of atomic particles. Professor Alcubierre in Mexico has developed the best possible theory for warp drive so far.
From the Wiki: "In 1953, the 1939 movie serial was edited into a feature film entitled Planet Outlaws, by Sherman Krellberg for release via Goodwill Pictures Inc..[1]"
So the high council of Saturn doesn't think that a ruler with a name like Killer Cain could be just a little suspicious, or sound untrustworthy ?! Also the reward for saving the day is an empty chair 🤣
Buck Rogers Planet Outlaw (1939) I found this on another movie/ "the 1939 movie serial was edited into a feature film entitled Planet Outlaws. Then it was edited again to feature length and titled Destination Saturn for syndication to television, in 1965. Finally, the serial was edited once again into a feature film format in the late 1970s, this version simply entitled Buck Rogers with the theatrical poster advertising, "Star Wars owes it all to Buck Rogers", and later was sold on videotape in the early 1990s by VCI Entertainment under the catalogue title of Planet Outlaws (which title, to make it appear legitimate, was also superimposed onto the first shot of film following the main titles). VCI released all twelve installments on DVD in September 2000. In November 2009, VCI released a special 70th-anniversary edition on DVD, with extras including "The History of Buck Rogers" by Clifford Weimer, a photo gallery and the 1935 Buck Rogers short feature originally shown at the 1933-34 Worlds Fair." ?
But I wouldnt be surprised if it was actually filmed and in the can before wwii. Notice the heroic flyers are wearing wwi daring flyboy outfits, with flared riding pants. The archetype changed by the 50's i think.
Johnny Wewoka old posting but you're right! as one posted, Flash Gordon first appeared in theaters in 1934, with a cliff hanger that made movie goers just have to return the next week to find out what happened!! each was 12 chapters long and were made until 1938, when Buddy got too old to play the brave young boy. this 1953 re release only added a 'modern' beginning. as I posted earlier. nobody had any idea how a rocket ship, able to carry passengers would be like, so audiences of that time were thrilled to see such futuristic serials but the writers imagination DID reach some! the 'televive' is now a reality, on ALL of our smart phones! the 'disolvo ray' is now the laser beam, adjustable to suit the need. I have a 4 box set of Flash Gordon on vcr tapes but saw this and thought I'd 'tune in' to see if there was a remake.. When I watch them,again, I always try to put myself as an audience member during those years and how marveled they must have been, which makes them even more enjoyable!!!
The intro may have been filmed in '53, but this series itself was filmed in the 30's. This should help explain to some the "silly" or "primitive crap" production values. A great deal has been edited out.
Interesting how they thought planetary travel would be in spacious ships, albeit sparsely and uncomfortably furnished in THIS imagination of space travel and the idea that Saturn not only had a breathable atmosphere but a rocky surface.
Maybe the first use of the slang saying “blockheads”. Now I’m going to be looking that up to see where and how long calling people “blockheads” when they do something dumb has been around.
Wow... What did I just see? No character development at all. It’s rushed from one scene to the next. It’s like a we’re missing scenes from the movie. How did Buck learn to pilot rockets and when did he become a Colonel? Deering is only a Lt in this series but a Colonel in the 70s series. The Asian Prince of Saturn is the Wise Blind Master if the series Kung Fu, Philson Ahn.
That's because 'Planet Out- laws' (1953) is in truth a Buck Rogers title of chap- ters from the 1930's. You're right, all this movie did was tailor all 13-14 chapters and sew them up into one single movie. I don't know why they did this. I think that the effort was a mistake and resulted in a poor film.
To 21st century viewers this just looks silly. But suppose we do conquer the solar system, the nearby stars and explore the area tens or maybe hundreds of lightyears around us. By that time, do people watching this think that Star Trek, Babylon 5 etc. is just as silly?
Talk about low budget...funny...wonder how those sparks & smoke of the exhaust were created...didn't know that the character's names of Colonel Deering and Dr. Hughes were carried over to the later series with Gil Gerard and Erin Gray...neat,
marbleman52 ,,, the sparks and smoke from the engines is created because that is the way the anti-matter engines operated ,,, LOL ,,,catseye shooter51 ,,,
this version, taken from the original has had at LEAST 50% of the original edited out!!! after watching half SO MUCH was missing that I just couldn't watch more!!!!!
"Calling Professor Smegma! Calling Professor Smegma ! Come in ! Come in ! This is miss Areola at Prejaculatory Command center ! Prepare for fellatial interaction ! "
There are just way too many silly things in this movie Even for 1953. But, I suppose, for the Saturday Matinees at our local hometown theatres, it's perfect for the young children to see such wonders from Hollywood. I wish (and I wished even then in 1954) that Hollywood had made their movies based upon Real Science and less on Hero Worship of fictional cowboys. Had Hollywood payed more attention to Real Science, we would have grown up with a more solid foundation of knowledge rather than crap
I profoundly hope I live long enough to see humanity harness something orders of magnitude better than chemical rockets, enabling us to explore and perhaps even colonize more than this little solar system and planet we are presently stuck with. Also there is this...we've got all our eggs in one basket. NOT an ideal situation for the long term (geologically speaking) survival of the human species.
Well Paul, it may depend on whether you are 15 or 75 years old. But I think that you'll see the beginning of what you hope; the end of chemical propellants. Anyway, I think that the idea of propellants will age like the idea of living in caves. The answer I think will become getting-from-one-place-to-another, not using propellants to get from point A to point B. But as for the colonization of geography which lay out beyond our system, - I'm really sorry Paul, but that task (IF the opportunity presents itself) in-my-own-opinion will not be our lifetime, not in decades, not in a century. Provided we and our Earth both manage to avoid any one of countless and lethal calamities, - and we all do happen to still be here in ~ 2520, that still will probably not be the toughest of hurdles. Should we still be stuck with conventional travel, - time will be one hurdle. This of course presupposes that travel will end this way. I for one, think that our currently held convention about linear travel will be abandoned, Euclid's simplest geometry ("the shortest distance...") cannot even be proved ! I think that this will mean that straight lines of travel, our idea of dimension including time, our whole concept of distances, the limits, parameters, and the behavior of light. Speed and velocity and acceleration will hopefully all change. A hurdle which faces us may well be the need for multi-generational crafts (most probably you will die while in route and no one reaching a target system will not doubt ever return). Another hurdle will be the procurement, the research, and the development, and assembledge of learning and materials, feasability, opportunity, logistics, capability ..., what am I missing ? And I'm omitting the transportation of the sheer amount, the volume, and weight of materials that we will need to take with us of course. The technology, the sciences, the resources, and prodigious advancements in physics; speaking-of-which - I think that both Newton and Einstein's models for our physics may well turn out to be only parts among parts not parts of a whole. The two may even unify (but I think not) but I hope what is more likely is for the discovery of others ! Very esoteric mathematics describing other physical laws and phenomena which will be even far less likely to enjoy a familial relationship with our own. So I personally think that should these things happen, - the year 2520 may well even be too soon ! But Paul, why limit ourselves to a puny goal like just travel to another star ! Our entire system is but a pin-prick out upon one of the spiral arms of our Milky Way; that pin- prick is so small that it can not even be seen on an 8 by 11 glossy print ! Our solar system - our nearest star, maybe Alpha Centuri - just our own Milky Way galaxy - just our own teenie-weenie galaxy cluster - just a single one of our countless super clusters - a tiny one billion square light years of our puny amount of observable sky ! Just the universe we're able to see is only a pathetic ~ 100 billion light years across, - how about just that ! Then of course what we can see is no doubt just another pin-prick in the whole cosmos Well, our physics isn't even there; Philosophy is sure gonna take a beating. Even light is falling behind. It's too slow. We couldn't even reach a perimeter. By the time we got there it would no longer be there; Earth too would be long gone - if we could ever return, - and we couldn't, because if countless other things had not occured by that time, - then once that far out, we would continue to to be carried outward with the expansion of space alone - forever, no chance of ever getting back. But Paul by then we would probably be squished back down into countless more big-bangs - or become a part of new unknown physics and end up becoming our own history. And Paul, that's not even the beginning.
![The Mad Monster (1942) [Horror] [Drama]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HB81HSHRauo/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Mad Monster (1942) [Horror] [Drama]](/img/tr.png)
It's amazing how far we came in 60 yrs. of science fiction!! This is so silly it's hard to watch. But can you imagine the little kids on a Saturday afternoon watching this in a big beautiful theater with popcorn, candy and a coke for 15 cents!! Maybe we should go back!!
Rickarama Trama - Get friends to enjoy it with you by having YT movie night: lights out, candles, popcorn, hotdogs, Raisinets and Coke. Make it a pajama party with the big boys for fun, that way, you can spike the punch and have fun with it.
@Dr Moriarty Why did you watch this?
@Dr Moriarty Easy to see why Holmes dislikes you.
so cheezy you have to love it..spaceships sound like a big industrial fan..
Nothing better sometimes than a good, ol' Buck Rogers movie! I always get a kick out of the sound effects for the space-ships and just enjoy a pleasant change from modern films. One thing that did catch my eye was the image of Planet Earth from their outer -space, it was definitely one of the more realistic portrayals I've seen in an old movie. I often think of how exciting it must have been to be a kid back in those days and let your imagination run wild after seeing one of these movies. :^) Thanks for sharing it ..
“By the year 2000 space travel may be common place.”
Yeah .. about that. 2022 here, and we bring you cat videos via Tik-Tok. Space travel to other worlds you say? .. sounds like Science Fiction to me!
It's call 'Willfull Ignorance'.
It's like climbing a ladder
with it's own overwhelm-
ing intermittent gravity.
Space travel is commonplace - people go up all the time. Its just only earth orbit, not to the moon or other planets.
Now 2024 and were still deteriorating,
Have just begun watching this and, while I thought it would just be a camp, I actually find it to be pretty good. The script moves things along, the characters act intelligently (so far), and the actors, though not all equally competent, seem committed to the story. Thanks for posting.
I love how the spaceship sound effects is just someone blaring on a fog horn or something 😂🤣
It's the credit card in the desk fan ploy 😁
Actually, it's an old school electric razor held against a microphone.
It could have been a low volume tea kettle.
Is it weird to say I like these condensed movie versions of serials rather than watching a full serial series 4 hours straight?
Watching and enjoying from European Union, Lithuania.
Army parade uniform pants. Definitely worth a watch, unintentionally funny.
Still better than Star Wars 1-3
Buster crabbe buck rodgers...30s depression era cliff hangers at the 10 cent movie on Saturday's.
Condensed version of the 4 hour Buck Roger's serial.
always loved the Buck Rogers series…Thanks for this…Ivette
You don't sign comments.
@@blackburn-ud9dm The past is another country, they do things differently there! Thank you, Ivette!
@@ivettea6358 Wow you really responded after al these years!
As a syfy fan , I lov this stuff !!! My father saw this in the movie , I saw this on TV as a kid . as a kid it fueled my imagination , this is the stuff the inspired as a kid George Lucas Steven Spielberg and others . much respect to this ..
The escape music at 18:00 sounds like a carnival is about to start. Love it! 😁
My guess is that the older Buck Rogers theater serials were sewn together to make a movie released in 53.
Yes.
Wow, that radio works as good as a Hallicrafters but it ain't one. Amazing!
This is a compilation of four chapter episodes from the Buck Rogers serials made in the late 1930s. They must have released it as a movie in the 1953.
For sure! I found it very strange they scored in 1953 .. In 1953 this production would not be a movie with these techniques and quality. (only Edward Davis Wood, Jr. with Plan 9 from Outer Space) kkkk
One interesting note, the narrator refers to a science fiction author who wrote about an atomic bomb before WWII. The author was Robert A. Heinlein.
They just added the narration, with the newspaper headlines, etc. You notice that the newspaper mentions jets, etc., which were not flying in the 1930s.
I thought 53 was off by a couple of decades :))
Clips were added showing a DC6 airliner which definitely didnt exist in the 30s. I do remember watching Buck Rogers,Commander Cody,Capt. Midnight etc on tv in the 50s. Sponsored by Ovaltine and Farfal the dog!
The best Sf Classics ever, thanks for load.
flash Gordon first appeared in about 1934 in weekly chapters, with a cliff hanger that made people come back. hoakey as it was things like the 'televive' was just a figment of some writers imagination, until some kid in the audience turned it into reality years later. the 'disolvo ray' turned into the laser beam. no clue what space travel would be like or how they would take off or land They made it simple and for the audience kinda believable. magnetic trains........ amazing how much of this sci fi is reality 80 years later!
Was a ray that made ship appear to be invisible.
I love the old bw space movies. Thanks for the upload
Love this stuff! Thank you!
+rahkin rah Wilma & Betty!
Crash 'in a polar region'? They wanna pick which one ...ha
Love the reference to the future.....2000.
Oooh a Buck Rogers flick...ah those guys on 'sat-er-run' are crazy.
Attack formation 9, killer Cain is doomed! hahaha These Corney old matinees are great fun!
I can't stop laughing, I'm in Love with Planet Outlaws, Pure Classic. - JPGold out.
Mini Jim a hidden gem a look far into the future .. the rocket ships are now a government secret..oh the horror shoud these secrets fall into hands os our enemies.
No expense was spared on special effects...technology so advanced its hidden among national security archives.
Whole teams of chechoslovakianmiami midgets were mercilessly slaughtered in the making of this jaw dropping example of flawless acting delivered so naturally you forget you're watching a science fiction masterpiece.
This is bound to have won some awards. They don't make them like this anymore.
Lovin' it. Thanks for the upload!
You must remember that this was made before World War 2, aimed solely for younger audiences, because science fiction stories was considered infantile. It must have been difficult times,especially for most SF writers, trying to sell their work, and taken seriously by the general public.
Warp Prime 42 *"aimed solely for younger audiences,"*
That's because there wasn't, and still isn't, much science fiction at all to speak of. What is called science fiction even today is still 99.9% science FANTASY. Remember that stupid film called Sunshine that people gushed over? That was a stupid slasher film which was rooted entirely in fantasy, and not at all science.
One of the first serious science fiction films was 2001 and it still remains unique since that was entirely a science fiction movie, and it's a rarity to this day. Star Trek is fantasy, Star Wars is fantasy - and those are for children.
+fuzzywzhe Perhaps you have never seen a film called "Mysterious Island" adapted from a story by Jules Vern. And then there is "20,000 Leagues Beneath the Sea" also by Vern. These were true science fiction. Both were the origin of Captain Nemo and the submarine Nautilus. If you have not seen these 1950's movies I can recommend both. As for targeting the younger audience, the movie "Forbidden Planet" with Walter Pigeon and a young Leslie Nielson, is widely considered the first serious treatment of a science fiction theme. But I agree with you technically this is a science FANTASY film. Cheers fuzzy
fuzzyidiot you are an idiot. What the fuck are you ranting on about? Science "Fiction" means made up just as Science "Fantasy" does.
It's hilarious when the idiots that have a bug up their ass start correcting people thinking they know more and end up sounding like fuzzyidiot does up above!
PeterDad60 *"Science "Fiction" means made up just as Science "Fantasy" does."*
No, it doesn't.
Science fiction is what is conceivably possible, however the technology doesn't exist, however the current known science doesn't invalidate it as a possibility.
Science fantasy is what is known to be impossible given the known science.
As we learn more and more about the natural world, more and more things fall from the category of fiction to fantasy. Jules Verne wrote a lot of science fiction.
fuzzywzhe, "science fiction" and "science fantasy" ARE the same thing. Both terms refer to science as a basis to tell fantastic stories that are right now, impossible. You say "Star Trek" is a fantasy because it will be impossible. However, there are a number of devices from the series that are becoming reality as we speak. The diagnostic bed, tricorders, the transporter and warp drive are moving from the realm of impossible to possible. Various medical supply companies now sell different versions that were inspired by the original beds. There are handheld scanners that can be aimed at various materials and can determine their composition. CERN and several US tech companies are making headway and have achieved transportation of atomic particles. Professor Alcubierre in Mexico has developed the best possible theory for warp drive so far.
Sounds good 😊 buster crabby.😀🤗🎄🎄🎄
Those shower caps for space helmets are FAROUT 🌠
greetings from argentine! very good!
From the Wiki:
"In 1953, the 1939 movie serial was edited into a feature film entitled Planet Outlaws, by Sherman Krellberg for release via Goodwill Pictures Inc..[1]"
So the high council of Saturn doesn't think that a ruler with a name like Killer Cain could be just a little suspicious, or sound untrustworthy ?! Also the reward for saving the day is an empty chair 🤣
Sinbad was hero in other stories although both sin and bad are used to mean doing evil.
Great movie 🎬 🎞 🎥 👍
I'm a scifi buff...have been for years....but for some reason never could get into the Buck Rogers Series.
Hoyt Bullock.
am j strange? why i love These b-movies?
Buck Rogers Planet Outlaw (1939) I found this on another movie/
"the 1939 movie serial was edited into a feature film entitled Planet Outlaws. Then it was edited again to feature length and titled Destination Saturn for syndication to television, in 1965. Finally, the serial was edited once again into a feature film format in the late 1970s, this version simply entitled Buck Rogers with the theatrical poster advertising, "Star Wars owes it all to Buck Rogers", and later was sold on videotape in the early 1990s by VCI Entertainment under the catalogue title of Planet Outlaws (which title, to make it appear legitimate, was also superimposed onto the first shot of film following the main titles). VCI released all twelve installments on DVD in September 2000. In November 2009, VCI released a special 70th-anniversary edition on DVD, with extras including "The History of Buck Rogers" by Clifford Weimer, a photo gallery and the 1935 Buck Rogers short feature originally shown at the 1933-34 Worlds Fair." ?
"Buck Rogers in the 25th Century" was pretty campy TV in the 80's. The sexual tension between Buck and Wilma Deering was awesome..
I hope they have those walking Robots
I don't think this movie was made in 1953---it 's style or the way it IS was made seems to be in the 30/s, Am I wrong?? Anybody??
made in 1939
@Dr Moriarty ........ think again.
No. This is postwar (from the atomic bombs.) These yarns were like comic books and intended for children. They were silly but kids didnt care.
But I wouldnt be surprised if it was actually filmed and in the can before wwii. Notice the heroic flyers are wearing wwi daring flyboy outfits, with flared riding pants. The archetype changed by the 50's i think.
Johnny Wewoka old posting but you're right! as one posted, Flash Gordon first appeared in theaters in 1934, with a cliff hanger that made movie goers just have to return the next week to find out what happened!! each was 12 chapters long and were made until 1938, when Buddy got too old to play the brave young boy.
this 1953 re release only added a 'modern' beginning.
as I posted earlier. nobody had any idea how a rocket ship, able to carry passengers would be like, so audiences of that time were thrilled to see such futuristic serials but the writers imagination DID reach some! the 'televive' is now a reality, on ALL of our smart phones! the 'disolvo ray' is now the laser beam, adjustable to suit the need.
I have a 4 box set of Flash Gordon on vcr tapes but saw this and thought I'd 'tune in' to see if there was a remake.. When I watch them,again, I always try to put myself as an audience member during those years and how marveled they must have been, which makes them even more enjoyable!!!
As far as the riff-raff is concerned, this film was very prophetic they do control the world.
You mean USA, yes unfortunately
The intro may have been filmed in '53, but this series itself was filmed in the 30's. This should help explain to some the "silly" or "primitive crap" production values. A great deal has been edited out.
I think the date should be late 30's
Interesting how they thought planetary travel would be in spacious ships, albeit sparsely and uncomfortably furnished in THIS imagination of space travel and the idea that Saturn not only had a breathable atmosphere but a rocky surface.
7:50 pp
how disturbingly prophetic 😳 🖖🏾
really QUALITY 30/40's stuff. 'sbout it.
Like watching current events, but in the 1940's..... Go Buck!
Their radio is huge.
Star Trek and Star Wars just as silly but higher budget. Funny clothes? Look around today at the sloppy look and hair "don'ts".
And the robot hats too
The rocket motor sounds are similar to pulse jets. Think V1 of ,WW2.
Flying disc might be a Frisbee.
Hydro...this is far more advanced than the Frisbee
Maybe the first use of the slang saying “blockheads”. Now I’m going to be looking that up to see where and how long calling people “blockheads” when they do something dumb has been around.
Hit me with the disolve-o ray Dr. Huer,I'm going into the girls locker room at the Y.
THATS A HOOT!!!
John Crucchiola to funny ...
John Crucchiola or hit me with inviso -Ray lol
Hit me with ur rhythm stick..🎶
Cowboy Doc Hi Doc, it's a fun song!
only 200 likes...? incredible... this is a jowl...ha... joya...
fantastic
Buck Rogers, and his buddy, Buddy..
Ever notice how all these older single heroes from the 30s - 60s all had young boy "buddies" or "wards" as Robin was called in "Batman"? LOL
As Seen on Family Classics with Dean Richards
so funky, fun to watch only if drunk. at 22: had to stop.
I like that they are prisioners
Buster Crabbe also starred in Flash Gordon
It's like watching a Silent Movie that's been dubbed......
Is this a shortened version of the Buck Rogers serial?
I believe so, the choppy cuts are pretty obvious
Watching in 2020
I never cared for the Buck Rogers movies. But I think it had more to do with Buster Crabbe than the stories. He just wasn't much of an actor.
But he's nice to look at.
I get the feeling this is an abbreviated version.
+tenhirankei - like, it took a little while to travel to Saturn and back...
Sound effects for spaceships is hysterical, and extremely annoying.
Killer Kane played by Ernie Kovaks?
So everyone can use radios to communicate with each other except when they are friendlies in enemy ships?
Wow...
What did I just see?
No character development at all.
It’s rushed from one scene to the next.
It’s like a we’re missing scenes from the movie.
How did Buck learn to pilot rockets and when did he become a Colonel?
Deering is only a Lt in this series but a Colonel in the 70s series.
The Asian Prince of Saturn is the Wise Blind Master if the series Kung Fu, Philson Ahn.
That's because 'Planet Out-
laws' (1953) is in truth a Buck Rogers title of chap-
ters from the 1930's. You're right, all this movie
did was tailor all 13-14
chapters and sew them up
into one single movie.
I don't know why they did
this. I think that the effort
was a mistake and resulted in a poor film.
Philip Ahn starred in the t.v. show kung fu.
Buster Crabbe IS Flash Gordon....
If flying disc is a discus made of metal and not a frisbee better to get out of the way.
Sure had funny pants in 1936
Jodphurs. Upper class riding kit.
I can't take it anymore...that's noisiest fucking spaceship I've ever seen!
Aw c'mon, you can make the same sound blowing across the top of a empty soda bottle.
To 21st century viewers this just looks silly. But suppose we do conquer the solar system, the nearby stars and explore the area tens or maybe hundreds of lightyears around us. By that time, do people watching this think that Star Trek, Babylon 5 etc. is just as silly?
I will be a little late to the party Jeanette
How is it that this film is not colorized?
The first science fiction cloaking device impressive.
Such tasty cheese.
Talk about low budget...funny...wonder how those sparks & smoke of the exhaust were created...didn't know that the character's names of Colonel Deering and Dr. Hughes were carried over to the later series with Gil Gerard and Erin Gray...neat,
marbleman52.
marbleman52 ,,, the sparks and smoke from the engines is created because that is the way the anti-matter engines operated ,,, LOL ,,,catseye shooter51 ,,,
Drones over New Jersey???
This is more like a late 1930s movie
this version, taken from the original has had at LEAST 50% of the original edited out!!! after watching half SO MUCH was missing that I just couldn't watch more!!!!!
sweet extra cheezy!
1953 or 1933?
+Kent Stansberry well, it says "jets...." on the head lines so it must be 1953, jets began c1940. but it plays like 1930
+Kent Stansberry - it is now 2016.
"Calling Professor Smegma! Calling Professor Smegma ! Come in ! Come in ! This is miss Areola at Prejaculatory Command center ! Prepare for fellatial interaction ! "
There are just way too many silly things in this movie Even for 1953. But, I suppose, for the Saturday Matinees at our local hometown theatres, it's perfect for the young children to see such wonders from Hollywood. I wish (and I wished even then in 1954) that Hollywood had made their movies based upon Real Science and less on Hero Worship of fictional cowboys. Had Hollywood payed more attention to Real Science, we would have grown up with a more solid foundation of knowledge rather than crap
I profoundly hope I live long enough to see humanity harness something orders of magnitude better than chemical rockets, enabling us to explore and perhaps even colonize more than this little solar system and planet we are presently stuck with. Also there is this...we've got all our eggs in one basket. NOT an ideal situation for the long term (geologically speaking) survival of the human species.
Well Paul, it may depend on whether you are 15 or 75 years old. But I think that you'll see the beginning of what you hope; the end of chemical propellants. Anyway, I think that the idea of propellants will age like the idea of living in caves. The answer I think will become getting-from-one-place-to-another, not using propellants to get from point A to point B. But as for the colonization of geography which lay out beyond our system, - I'm really sorry Paul, but that task (IF the opportunity presents itself)
in-my-own-opinion will not be our lifetime, not in decades, not in a century.
Provided we and our Earth both manage to avoid any one of countless and lethal calamities, - and we all do happen to still be here in ~
2520, that still will probably not be the toughest of hurdles.
Should we still be stuck with conventional travel, -
time will be one hurdle. This of course presupposes that travel will end this way. I for one, think that our currently held convention about linear travel will be abandoned, Euclid's simplest geometry ("the shortest distance...") cannot even be proved !
I think that this will mean that straight lines of travel, our idea of dimension including time, our whole concept of distances, the limits, parameters, and the behavior of light. Speed and velocity and acceleration will hopefully all change.
A hurdle which faces us may well be the need for multi-generational crafts
(most probably you will die while in route and no one reaching a target system will not doubt ever return).
Another hurdle will be the procurement, the research, and the development, and assembledge of learning and materials, feasability, opportunity, logistics, capability ..., what am I missing ? And I'm omitting the transportation of the sheer amount, the volume, and weight of materials that we will need to take with us of course. The technology, the sciences, the resources, and prodigious advancements in physics;
speaking-of-which - I think that both Newton and Einstein's models for our physics may well turn out to be only parts among parts not parts of a whole. The two may even unify (but I think not) but I hope what is more likely is for the discovery of others ! Very esoteric mathematics describing other physical laws and phenomena which will be even far less likely to enjoy a familial relationship with our own.
So I personally think that should these things happen, - the year 2520 may well even be too soon !
But Paul, why limit ourselves to a puny goal like just travel to another star ! Our entire system
is but a pin-prick out upon one of the spiral arms of our Milky Way; that pin-
prick is so small that it can
not even be seen on an 8
by 11 glossy print !
Our solar system - our nearest star, maybe Alpha Centuri - just our own Milky Way galaxy -
just our own teenie-weenie galaxy cluster - just a single one of our countless super clusters -
a tiny one billion square light years of our puny amount of observable sky !
Just the universe we're able to see is only a pathetic ~ 100 billion light years across, - how about just that ! Then of course what we can see is no doubt just another pin-prick in the whole cosmos
Well, our physics isn't even there; Philosophy is sure gonna take a beating.
Even light is falling behind.
It's too slow. We couldn't even reach a perimeter.
By the time we got there
it would no longer be there;
Earth too would be long gone - if we could ever return, - and we couldn't,
because if countless other things had not occured by that time, - then once that far out, we would continue to to be carried outward with the expansion of space alone -
forever, no chance of ever getting back.
But Paul by then we would probably be squished back down into countless more big-bangs - or become a part of new unknown physics and end up becoming our own history.
And Paul, that's not even the beginning.
రవ్వల సూర్యా
Seth...not watching.
corny bt clean
Oracle movie
This is the shit that people actually watched back then? Un-fucking-believable.
+Vertical Horizon - you need to "go back" and read(!) some early science fiction!
Ah Jesus, the advertisements ruin this film. It is unwatchable and a phuque up.
............2
YEAR IS WRONG
to many adds i gave up on this channel
Am this a true story? Huh? well, am it?
It are, and am be.
unbearable
Yeah, old stuff. Not from the 50's. Rehash from the serials. I'm outta here!