Get involved in classes with working actors! Whether virtually or in person. Acting studios love to post when their actors have booked something. Find a studio that has actors who are booking the kind of roles you want to and stay involved. It helps you study acting correctly, network, and learn from others.
I was never a big fan of these movies in the first place, but after seeing this, I can see why people say the MI series just became Tom Cruise's vanity project over time. I've always been more drawn to the more cerebral and realistic spy movies. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy is a perfect example.
@@NoHandleGrr You can draw the genre lines however you want. I was talking about subject matter, not genres. The common through-line is MI is a series about espionage. Hence why I said I'm more drawn to the more cerebral, realistic, and dramatic movies about espionage, rather than over the top action-based espionage movies like this.
The idea of the M:I films until the recent ones, was that each would have a very different director with a dramatically different style. Thus from Brian dePalma to John Woo. (You oddly make no reference to noticing the directors, or being familiar with their work or at least reputations.) The first one was very very dePalma, because dePalma is always very very dePalma, and this one is correspondingly very very Woo, with all his signatures (flowing scarves, birds, etc.). Are you planning on getting to #4 and so on? Or have you just dropped the MI films after #3? (Also, your postings of the thumbnail links is oddly inconsistent.)
I'm only halfway through the reaction, but my primary thought keeps repeating in my head: are you COMPLETELY unfamiliar with John Woo? Because you sure seem to talk about the movie as if you've never seen or even read about a Woo movie before. Which, in fairness, isn't something ever demanded of audiences or watchers in general, but aren't you some kind of film student or professional? I may just not be taking into sufficient account your degree of youth.
MI-2 is made by John Woo which is why it feels so different from all the others.
What a clueless reaction from someone who claims to.know about movie making.but clearly knows virtually nothing.
Yeah she starts off questioning everything. No patience to allow the movie to reveal things. Constant excessive opinions.
My business partner did an exchange trip his teacher wife went on for 1997, in Canberra, so this movie hit close to the heart.
20C: when he learned real grenades, disappointing v movie grenades.
Sherlock's brother is Mycroft Holmes.
I remembered as soon as I stopped filming and was so mad
The 'bad guy in _When a Stranger Calls_' is William Mapother, Tom's 'cousin Billy'
Yes it is actually Tom doing it
Do you have any tips for new actors?
Get involved in classes with working actors! Whether virtually or in person. Acting studios love to post when their actors have booked something. Find a studio that has actors who are booking the kind of roles you want to and stay involved. It helps you study acting correctly, network, and learn from others.
Note the score this time is Hans Zimmer, last time Danny Elfman ICYMI
Ahhhhh. I loooove Danny and Hans but Hans really hit the right note on this one 😉
I was never a big fan of these movies in the first place, but after seeing this, I can see why people say the MI series just became Tom Cruise's vanity project over time. I've always been more drawn to the more cerebral and realistic spy movies. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy is a perfect example.
Action and spying are two different genres, which may overlap, but which does not make them the same.
@@NoHandleGrr You can draw the genre lines however you want. I was talking about subject matter, not genres. The common through-line is MI is a series about espionage. Hence why I said I'm more drawn to the more cerebral, realistic, and dramatic movies about espionage, rather than over the top action-based espionage movies like this.
The idea of the M:I films until the recent ones, was that each would have a very different director with a dramatically different style.
Thus from Brian dePalma to John Woo. (You oddly make no reference to noticing the directors, or being familiar with their work or at least reputations.)
The first one was very very dePalma, because dePalma is always very very dePalma, and this one is correspondingly very very Woo, with all his signatures (flowing scarves, birds, etc.).
Are you planning on getting to #4 and so on? Or have you just dropped the MI films after #3? (Also, your postings of the thumbnail links is oddly inconsistent.)
You mentioned Harry Potter, but did you notice Alastor Moody is in this movie? :)
Climbing up a building..._Ghost Protocol_
I'm only halfway through the reaction, but my primary thought keeps repeating in my head: are you COMPLETELY unfamiliar with John Woo?
Because you sure seem to talk about the movie as if you've never seen or even read about a Woo movie before.
Which, in fairness, isn't something ever demanded of audiences or watchers in general, but aren't you some kind of film student or professional?
I may just not be taking into sufficient account your degree of youth.
Dyson...no... that sucks, cannot remember... Cyberdyne!
This iteration of the framchise is more style over substance.
Benji face wearing Solomon Lane, that's a lot...
Sir Anthony!
3-7 are incredible
I’m excited!
There are and is nothing wrong and bad with how they r talking of and about the women in this
He is not harassing at all r you ok and you r not very good at your job r you