I agree with Your opinion, and Although I was of course Expecting more, I was expecting Toxin to appear and play a big role since he was Teased In Venom 2's ending, and I would like it if Some Spider-Man appeared maybe, I did Enjoy it a lot as a Fun nonsense Movie and I did have a fun time watching It.
The first scene was also shown in the end credits of let their be carnage. However, the end credit showed a tiny piece of venom was in the spiderman universe leading to the possibility of vwnom making an appearance in spiderman 4. ( sorry if my gramner isnt super good im writing this with one hand and im too tired to proofread)
simplest answer to why didn’t Sony tie into marvel’s universe is money, for example Disney a multi million dollar company refuses to use any of George Lucas original characters is because he gets a cut, therefore they keep adding their own made up garbage and spin-offs just out of greed or spite, they have the money to pay the man, they just find it more lucrative to run their own original slop and see what sticks(spoiler none of it does) so Sony is gonna squeeze the life out of their titles till they stop seeing financial returns they don’t care if it’s good or bad,this movie felt like they had a finale trope checklist from the 2000s and stuck with it
it definitely was an enjoyable movie but i agree that as a "final" venom movie it didn't really do the series or characters justice but it's also pretty obvious in the way it ends with eddie moving back to NY that we're going to see this Venom again and it's going to be in a spider-man movie. especially with knull as a looming avengers-level threat. i agree they wasted alot of that movie's potential but i don't think we've seen the last of tom hardy's Venom
I honestly agree. While it wasn't bad, I've honestly always enjoyed the Venom movies, but yeah, this one was quite disappointing... Also Venom has been a hero more than he's been a villain but I get it.
dude, 90 minutes is movie length, in fact for a long ass time most movies where around 1,5 hours and a lot of them still are, it doesn't have to be a 2+ hour movie to be a movie, in fact the average movie takes between 90 and 120 minutes making 2+ hour movies long movies, not the 1,5 hour movie a short film or as you put it ''a youtube essay'' which is quite ironic as essays tend to be short form discutions like the video you just made, in fact unless you are a undergraduate, you won't be making essays that are above 1000 words. So please don't compare a full featrure length films duration to your 6 minute essays length
1. u won't be writing any essays at all cuz ur spelling is abominal 2. not a lot of films are 1,5 hours, most of them are 2 hours or longer!! 3. me bomboclat 4. i wrote 1000000 word essay for me PhD. last year so suck me balls 5. me bomboclat 6. me bomboclat
okay so I haven't watched the new venom yet, and for that reason I will not critizize any critique you have for the movie itself, but saying that venom is just a villain is just plain wrong. idk if you remember but venom started as spidermans suit, where he acted as a hero, then spiderman abandoned him, creating a strong hatred towards spiderman specifically, not some other hero and not the general population. and this is just the groundwork for why stating venom is a villain is wrong. you see in the comics after venom has gone through a few hosts he eventually ends up binding to eddie brock, who would calm down venom, making him the anti-hero main character of his own story with carnage as the main villain, and eddie and venom eventually end up freeing symbiote kind from the tyranic grip of their ruler, by beating the leader of the symbiotes know as knull and even after that venom ends up binding with dylan brock eddies son who doesn't want to be a super hero but ends up becoming one anyway after binding with venom. So no, they aren't portraying venom inacuratly by making him an anti-hero, they wouldn't be wrong to show him as a villain either, they're just not wrong to make him an anti-hero
I agree with Your opinion, and Although I was of course Expecting more, I was expecting Toxin to appear and play a big role since he was Teased In Venom 2's ending, and I would like it if Some Spider-Man appeared maybe, I did Enjoy it a lot as a Fun nonsense Movie and I did have a fun time watching It.
The first scene was also shown in the end credits of let their be carnage. However, the end credit showed a tiny piece of venom was in the spiderman universe leading to the possibility of vwnom making an appearance in spiderman 4. ( sorry if my gramner isnt super good im writing this with one hand and im too tired to proofread)
simplest answer to why didn’t Sony tie into marvel’s universe is money, for example Disney a multi million dollar company refuses to use any of George Lucas original characters is because he gets a cut, therefore they keep adding their own made up garbage and spin-offs just out of greed or spite, they have the money to pay the man, they just find it more lucrative to run their own original slop and see what sticks(spoiler none of it does) so Sony is gonna squeeze the life out of their titles till they stop seeing financial returns they don’t care if it’s good or bad,this movie felt like they had a finale trope checklist from the 2000s and stuck with it
Its venom not Spiderman mate
How is 90 minutes not a film.
it definitely was an enjoyable movie but i agree that as a "final" venom movie it didn't really do the series or characters justice but it's also pretty obvious in the way it ends with eddie moving back to NY that we're going to see this Venom again and it's going to be in a spider-man movie. especially with knull as a looming avengers-level threat. i agree they wasted alot of that movie's potential but i don't think we've seen the last of tom hardy's Venom
I honestly agree. While it wasn't bad, I've honestly always enjoyed the Venom movies, but yeah, this one was quite disappointing...
Also Venom has been a hero more than he's been a villain but I get it.
dude, 90 minutes is movie length, in fact for a long ass time most movies where around 1,5 hours and a lot of them still are, it doesn't have to be a 2+ hour movie to be a movie, in fact the average movie takes between 90 and 120 minutes making 2+ hour movies long movies, not the 1,5 hour movie a short film or as you put it ''a youtube essay'' which is quite ironic as essays tend to be short form discutions like the video you just made, in fact unless you are a undergraduate, you won't be making essays that are above 1000 words. So please don't compare a full featrure length films duration to your 6 minute essays length
judging by your spelling, you may or may not be an undergraduate!
@@TeeWrex4 is that supposed to be an insult? XD
@@m3gduwu560this guys is incredibly insecure
Your voice and argument and reaction says alot about you and your age you are 14-16@@TeeWrex4
1. u won't be writing any essays at all cuz ur spelling is abominal
2. not a lot of films are 1,5 hours, most of them are 2 hours or longer!!
3. me bomboclat
4. i wrote 1000000 word essay for me PhD. last year so suck me balls
5. me bomboclat
6. me bomboclat
okay so I haven't watched the new venom yet, and for that reason I will not critizize any critique you have for the movie itself, but saying that venom is just a villain is just plain wrong. idk if you remember but venom started as spidermans suit, where he acted as a hero, then spiderman abandoned him, creating a strong hatred towards spiderman specifically, not some other hero and not the general population. and this is just the groundwork for why stating venom is a villain is wrong. you see in the comics after venom has gone through a few hosts he eventually ends up binding to eddie brock, who would calm down venom, making him the anti-hero main character of his own story with carnage as the main villain, and eddie and venom eventually end up freeing symbiote kind from the tyranic grip of their ruler, by beating the leader of the symbiotes know as knull and even after that venom ends up binding with dylan brock eddies son who doesn't want to be a super hero but ends up becoming one anyway after binding with venom. So no, they aren't portraying venom inacuratly by making him an anti-hero, they wouldn't be wrong to show him as a villain either, they're just not wrong to make him an anti-hero