Not that it matters, but not clear whether he was shooting (looked like an oop). Great call. Great process by the officials. Spot on. Text book. Only blemish is Red yelling at White going to the bench. Rather that that was eliminated.
@@2themoon863 of course he could've been hit with a T and i could almost say that even without knowing what he was yelling he probably should've been hit with a T
@@samuel.carlson flagrant 1 is called when the defending player makes no play whatsoever to the ball and flagrant 2 is called when the defending player makes no play whatsoever and the hit is above the neck
Yes, he got ejected from the game. That is why he was leaving. In high school rules, there is not Flagrant 1 and Flagrant 2 fouls. A Flagrant Foul means you are ejected from the game. A Flagrant 1 in NCAA is like an Intentional Foul in high school.
So here’s a question: Since the Arkansas player #0 who committed a Flagrant-2 (ejection) was apparently talking trash as he was walking past the Kentucky huddle, can he be hit with technical foul(s) while the review is going on, and can he be ejected on T’s while a review for the flagrant-2 is going on?
My guess is that Kentucky was running their mouths. If you click on the next link, the play before this, an Arkansas player lays out another Kentucky player. Stuff like this just doesn't happen
Def a flagrant foul, but come on, this wasn't even a really hard foul. He didn't wind up or anything, just shoved the guy in the face. They acted like this was akin to assault. SMH
At the begining of his act of shooting, he got triped, foul P and sequence, at the end he got banged pretty hard on a U foul (intentional) very close to a D foul . . .two fouls on the score sheet, two FT or count basket and one.
@@1Outis1 I did not see travel, yes, all movements from the held ball by the shooter till his return to th floor or standing position, are act of shooting!
@@gyrowave the travel is a moot point anyway because of the flagrant foul. I'm still not convinced he was shooting though, it looked more like he was passing to me. When you say held ball, does that cover what he does after he picks up his dribble?
Not that it matters, but not clear whether he was shooting (looked like an oop). Great call. Great process by the officials. Spot on. Text book. Only blemish is Red yelling at White going to the bench. Rather that that was eliminated.
Could the red player been hit with T’s for that?
@@2themoon863 of course he could've been hit with a T and i could almost say that even without knowing what he was yelling he probably should've been hit with a T
I agree with the call a flagrant 2. He should have been given a technical for talking or taunting after the play had ended.
Would've been a flagrant 3 if there was such a thing...
Actually it wasn't even a flagrant 2. Check out 2:16. It's a "fragrant 2"...
Absolutely Flagrant 2, no question about it.
Can you give an explanation from the rule book for that one? I’d really appreciate it
@@samuel.carlson flagrant 1 is called when the defending player makes no play whatsoever to the ball and flagrant 2 is called when the defending player makes no play whatsoever and the hit is above the neck
Malik monk, de Aaron fox, bam adebayo, all have turned out pretty good tbh
The graphic that comes up @ 2:12 saying "Fragrant 2"
Yes, he got ejected from the game. That is why he was leaving.
In high school rules, there is not Flagrant 1 and Flagrant 2 fouls. A Flagrant Foul means you are ejected from the game. A Flagrant 1 in NCAA is like an Intentional Foul in high school.
It says Fragrant. Fragrant
But it literally says "fragrant" 2 -- maybe the player was wearing a lot of deoderant.
or not enough
@@kurisu_rpg Maybe not enough.
Common foul.
Flagrant fouls should not even exist.
Flagrant for sure.
I used to find Dickie V funny while my gf thought he was annoying as heck. Now I find him annoying as well.
flagrant 2
So here’s a question: Since the Arkansas player #0 who committed a Flagrant-2 (ejection) was apparently talking trash as he was walking past the Kentucky huddle, can he be hit with technical foul(s) while the review is going on, and can he be ejected on T’s while a review for the flagrant-2 is going on?
Sorry, Arkansas #33, not #0.
De'aaron and bam
Laimbeer level foul!
Dude, really? This was ameteur hour, Laimbeer was an artist. Lol
You asked if the officials got it right yes they did coming from one who officiated for 46 years!
he was falling back words anyway
My guess is that Kentucky was running their mouths. If you click on the next link, the play before this, an Arkansas player lays out another Kentucky player. Stuff like this just doesn't happen
lol mike anderson is a trash coach
Def a flagrant foul, but come on, this wasn't even a really hard foul. He didn't wind up or anything, just shoved the guy in the face. They acted like this was akin to assault. SMH
At the begining of his act of shooting, he got triped, foul P and sequence, at the end he got banged pretty hard on a U foul (intentional) very close to a D foul . . .two fouls on the score sheet, two FT or count basket and one.
So those last two steps, which would normally be a travelling call btw, are part of the act of shooting?
@@1Outis1 I did not see travel, yes, all movements from the held ball by the shooter till his return to th floor or standing position, are act of shooting!
@@gyrowave the travel is a moot point anyway because of the flagrant foul. I'm still not convinced he was shooting though, it looked more like he was passing to me. When you say held ball, does that cover what he does after he picks up his dribble?
only problem was a ref pushing a player back that was standing there with his hands in the air.
Should have been a common foul