Thanks for sharing. So were you sending the signal of track 16 to springreverb/fx? If so was that the only channel? or also directly from the individual instruments.
All the instruments except for the bass and percussion were going to 16. The reverb was set up as a normal send for the instruments, but the return of the reverb was also being sent to 16. So I was filtering the instruments and reverb together, in parallel. So I used Aux 1 to send the instruments and reverb return to the filter. The reverb itself was on Aux 3 send. Hope that helps.
No idea. Scientist is the man to ask. I haven’t talked to him since I gat this filter, but when he released his vst filter, he said to run it in as a send, so in parallel. We never got into how he gets the mix sounding good first.
Nice demo. Thanks. So its essentially an additive hp eq as you are still hearing the original sound as well? Also in interested in why you inserted the eq in the parallel channel. Is there a difference than going from the send output to the eq then to a channel?
I’m using the eq from the mixer, it’s not an insert as such. I used it to counteract the effect of the filter at the highest position, 7.5 kHz. So that I could leave the filter on and parked in that position without it affecting the sound too much, to get rid of the resonance and some of the higher frequencies from the parallel path.
Enjoyed this video very nice, thank you
Big thanks!
Thank you!
Nice One Jah Servant , great explanation and dub ! 🔥
Bless up!
Great demo brother! I never thought of a counter EQ move, that's smart, right on !
Thanks bro. Seems to work. Opens up usage for the filter.
Thanks for sharing, I have my HPF inserted on the spring verb channel, but i'm going to try this way so I have it across the board.
It’s worth experimenting with. Pet me know how it turns out. Bless
Another Great presentation. Keep up the good work... Trev
Give thanks for the kind words and steady encouragement, Trevor. Keep good!
Thanks for sharing. So were you sending the signal of track 16 to springreverb/fx? If so was that the only channel? or also directly from the individual instruments.
All the instruments except for the bass and percussion were going to 16. The reverb was set up as a normal send for the instruments, but the return of the reverb was also being sent to 16. So I was filtering the instruments and reverb together, in parallel. So I used Aux 1 to send the instruments and reverb return to the filter. The reverb itself was on Aux 3 send. Hope that helps.
Neat trick! Thanks for sharing.
Sure thing. Thanks.
Good one. Do you know how tubbys etc had it setup to deal with resonance on all the classic dubplates?
No idea. Scientist is the man to ask. I haven’t talked to him since I gat this filter, but when he released his vst filter, he said to run it in as a send, so in parallel. We never got into how he gets the mix sounding good first.
@@JahServant ok thanks for the reply
Nice demo. Thanks. So its essentially an additive hp eq as you are still hearing the original sound as well? Also in interested in why you inserted the eq in the parallel channel. Is there a difference than going from the send output to the eq then to a channel?
I’m using the eq from the mixer, it’s not an insert as such. I used it to counteract the effect of the filter at the highest position, 7.5 kHz. So that I could leave the filter on and parked in that position without it affecting the sound too much, to get rid of the resonance and some of the higher frequencies from the parallel path.
Well done👌🏽
Great great Great!
What do you use to record?
And what kind of filter? Is that a Westfinga one?
Big thanks
Thanks. Yes, Westfinga filter. Not sure what you want to know about recording. I use Cubase for a DAW.
My friend, what is the brand and model of the HPF you use?
It’s made by Westfinga.
www.westfinga.com/product-page/wffilter
great video! thanks